Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bahia-13.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Bahia-13.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2019 at 01:15:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
- Info created and uploaded by Dlaurini - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 01:15, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry, no detail at full screen. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
OpposeExcessive noise reduction and well visible post processing (black brush strokes, lower left) among other issues. Arion, it doesn't look like you've progressed in your judgment at all after your block because of low-effort nominations exactly like this one ... – Lucas 05:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Had to strike this oppose because the FPX-contested below counts an an oppose as well. – Lucas 11:00, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Looks good as a thumbnail, but at full size the overprocessing is evident.--Peulle (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose Another waste of our time by Arion. Much cloning of the sky as well as other points. Charles (talk) 09:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose As a thumb, this looks stunning, but per Peulle and Lucas there is too much NR at full-size; the image is very lacking in detail, and the lighthouse itself is noisy and blurry. Tough shot, of course, but not up to scratch, I feel. Cmao20 (talk) 12:44, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, low quality per oppose votes, I've reported Arion again at ANU – Lucas 17:31, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Lucasbosch: While you were gone like Arion, we have tightened our rules for FPX so that it no longer applies to images that have a lot of opposes and no support as it is not against the guidelines. --Boothsift 23:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't even like it as a thumb: The top of the light house looks very distorted. --El Grafo (talk) 10:13, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
- Please withdraw this image; with this many opposes you're just, as Charles said, wasting our time. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 09:14, 21 September 2019 (UTC)