Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive/2020-9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammadnijamuddin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Birmingham, AL- Dec 2013 2013-12-06 18-21.jpg, both files are not in use. GFJ (talk) 19:19, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:46, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful: The image shows hardly anything, not even the complete head of the person. Probably out of scope as well. 213.147.160.52 19:35, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: out of scope. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:47, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely low resolution, not useful. GFJ (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, redundant to File:Geni vinnarna igen! = männen!! 2013-12-23 21-41.jpg. GFJ (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not in use. Likely a personal photo from the uploader, since there is a name in the file title. 2001:4BB8:258:14A:E0F9:2F35:AE91:D19B 21:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of sky through trees. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 14:25, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 17:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable band, low quality, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:56, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 01left (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope. Plenty of better alternatives of the celebrities in their respective categories.

P 1 9 9   03:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Starbucks item with writing. Out of scope Malcolma (talk) 09:55, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 16:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a television screen shot by the top right hand corner white bar Mjrmtg (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, blurred, and of indeterminate subject. Likely of little use to anyone and doesn't do Wikimedia any favours. Acabashi (talk) 13:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not educationally helpful. Sole contribution of the uploader. GFJ (talk) 09:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 18:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Filename translates as "16 year old Chinese high school student's penis". World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:44, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mjrmtg: You categorized this 10 days ago, shortly after it was uploaded. Any comments? World's Lamest Critic (talk) 23:48, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know the translation. I'd nominate it for deletion. --Mjrmtg (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. I will also contact Wikimedia Legal and ask them to take action, if necessary. --Ahmadtalk 22:37, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, possibly also out of scope. GFJ (talk) 19:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:51, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without encyclopedic relevance, not in use and out of scope. GFJ (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:40, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without encyclopedic relevance, not in use and out of scope. GFJ (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:41, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie, unlikely to be uploader's work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:49, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Unidentified document. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 09:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 19:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]