Commons:Deletion requests/Images from www.araldicacivica.it

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

These are all claimed to be from [1] and there is no source of permission, so COM:COA#Coat of arms "found on the internet" would appear to apply here. See also the related discussion at en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 27#File:Varapodio-Stemma.gif. --Stefan4 (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Araldicacivica was among the first sites granting Wikipedia permission to reproduce their contents. Of course there is no relevant ticket about it, since there was no OTRS back in 2004. The disclaimer on their site says it's ok to republish their pictures as long as they're credited, although on it.wiki we currently seek for a full authorization by municipalities to use the "real", actual insignia. --Elitre (talk) 21:15, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All drawings from Araldicacivica.it (ie the arms "ridisegnate" [redrawn], such Palmanova ad Cervia in our case) are under cc​​-by-sa 3.0 (see disclameir in italian: «Tutti i contenuti sono sotto licenza Common 3. In pratica le immagini possono essere usate liberamente purché si citi sempre la fonte» [All contents are licensed under the Common 3. In practice, the images may be used freely as long as you always refer to the source]), the situation is naturally different for the coats of arms "official" contained on the site, that may be used only as a fair-use.GJo (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
P.s.: sorry for my bad english.GJo (talk) 22:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It says "Common 3", not "CC-BY-SA 3.0". "Common 3" could mean any of CC-BY 3.0, CC-BY-SA 3.0 or CC-BY.ND 3.0. A non-commercial restriction is unlikely since it is suggested that "le immagini possono essere usate liberamente" without mention any commercial limitation. --Stefan4 (talk) 23:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, the license has been clarified: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0.GJo (talk) 13:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. MBisanz talk 02:10, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

Another set of images has been uploaded:

Stefan4 (talk) 20:42, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

____________
Deleted. As above. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

The visual style suggests that these originally might come from araldicacivica.it or that they alternatively are scans from books or something. At the very least, the attribution requirement is violated since the author isn't indicated. They just refer to deleted pages on enwiki and itwiki.

Stefan4 (talk) 19:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 14:04, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from www.araldicacivica.it

[edit]

Another set has been uploaded:

Stefan2 (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:06, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]