Commons:Deletion requests/File:Srní vrch, polom (01).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Srní vrch, polom (01).jpg

Almost same like File:Srní vrch, polom.jpg. Low quality and overexposure. One picture is enough... --Chmee2 (talk) 09:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Keep The images are not identical, File:Srní vrch, polom (01).jpg has a better composition. There are generally few images of forest windfalls here. --ŠJů (talk) 09:42, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Keep Reason not sufficient for deletion. --Foroa (talk) 10:02, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Delete Duplicate, low quality and overexposed. --Tlusťa (talk) 10:10, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Delete The main reason is no other information value. The quality of the second version is not so bad --Packa (talk) 11:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Keep I agree with ŠJů. No reason for deletion. --Nolanus ✉ (C | E) 11:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Keep Obviously not the same photo. In scope, categorized, described, with location, with a free license and a clear copyright status. No valid reason for deletion. --Dezidor (talk) 13:24, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Delete lower quality duplicate.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 14:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Delete--Mirek 14:45, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Delete very bad quality duplicate -- Mercy (☎|✍) 15:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Delete Duplicate whith miserble quality.--Jagro (talk) 15:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Delete Really low quality. --Ragimiri (talk) 15:28, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

 Keep Not the same image. Can have an encyclopedic value. Yann (talk) 18:23, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

---

Kept. Not a duplicate- Finn Rindahl (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)