Commons:Deletion requests/File:Noah D'castellano.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This obviously not the work of a fandom wiki, not that I can find it under the given licence there anyway. Uploader removed dw-no-source which I added but without providing the proper source info. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 06:25, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Copying over uploaders comments by the uploader, Alisha Yvonne, to the talk page: This is a Own work and contribution with Tabletop Time Wiki, stop saying that we don't have the enough sources to attribute Noah D'castellano File on wikipedia Commons, it's not fair, We just helping without getting pay, thanks to everyone. Alisha Yvonne (talk) 05:44, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- We don't want to hear again people like Cakelot1 talk about my work it's not contribs a derivative work and no source or permission of the original work is provided. How? Everything is there the enough information is there, people need to help instead of being rude and deleting someone work even less when it's for free. Alisha Yvonne (talk) 05:49, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- To the above I'll add that the image was uploaded to "Tabletop Time Wiki" by a Juanadisqueapata, who is not obviously the same person given on the watermark of the image (that seems to be "Hector Pacha photography"?). If the uploader wants to explain how they know that the original photographer is the one who uploaded it to fandom, or has released it under the given licence, that would be a good way to keep the file here. I'd also recommend you read Commons:License laundering Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 07:34, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader has also added Photos taken by Emily Araujo to the image description, but again that isn't the person who uploaded it to fandom, nor are they the person on the watermark, and again hasn't been shown to release the image under a free licence. If the uploader has some information about the actual original photographer (not re-uploaders) it would be much appreciated. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 07:41, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Licensing issues as detailed by the nominator, plus scope issues: there's no evidence of this person's notability. The only usage of the file was on a Wikidata item about someone else, which was hijacked to be about this person. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10 - The uploader's behavior in response to this DR has also warranted a block. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
