Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emma and Kristina byEmma.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 07:59, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 15:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Out of project scope. Only used on one page as an example of pictures that should be deleted: "useless miscellaneous bullshit" kept on Commons, making "this project and its members a joke" Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Still in use in User: namespace, so inside the Project scope. If an admin decided to keep the file, is because he know the Commons policies. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:37, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Delete But I think, that the file is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 17:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)- Delete As per Taivo Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as long as used, per Amitie 10g. The user page they are used at may be in violation of WP:POINT, but that is a different story. --Krd 19:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The user put it in a long series of images that should not be kept on Commons -- therefore its only user specifically agrees that it should be deleted. Keeping images to illustrate things we should not keep seems foolish to me. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
