Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deputati UDAR.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deputati UDAR.jpg

[edit]

Very strong doubts about own work, especially in view of the fact that the file uploader was blocked in the English Wikipedia for destructive editing and extensive sockpuppetry. At least OTRS from a public figure needed. Ymblanter (talk) 11:12, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And EXIF missing of course.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And the user instead of providing the proof that this is indeed his own file engaged into an edit war over the FFD template.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:32, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now- I'd be very careful about deleting this. It's clearly a very sensitive political topic, but that shouldn't get in the way of hosting the file here (i.e., "no censorship" may apply). Whichever side you are on politically, a photo of deputies in the Rada wearing t-shirts saying "Putin F* you" is important information. The EXIF information may have been removed for privacy/personal safety reasons. Nevertheless, if somebody could show that the Rada does not have a balcony where the public can take photos, I'd politely ask the uploader to explain how the photo was obtained, and ask for an OTRS ticket. If that can't be provided, only then would I delete it. Smallbones (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
My concern is not the content of the file, which I have no problem with, but a small size, no EXIF, absence of the public access to the Rada (the uploader can be a registered media reporter though), and the reputation of the uploader. EXIF can be supplied via OTRS for example, and then I would be fine with keeping the file.--Ymblanter (talk) 23:49, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep for now-Це моє власне фото, яке я зробив з мобільного телефону Nokia Lumia 525 в приміщенні Верховної Ради України (під час перерви у пленарному засіданні) з балкону для гостей та преси!!! Будь ласка, досить займатися відкритим вандалізмом! Окремо зазначу, що є ще фото зроблено з дозволу Народного депутата України Матіос Марії Василівни! (https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Файл:Марія_Матіос.jpg) --Jeromjerom (talk) 12:23, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh, I see that you also canvassed people on the English Wikipedia (evading your block there). Very nice of you.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:45, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    And of course since you are lying all around, I have zero trust in what you are saying.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:46, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Авжеж, адже світ повинен знати, хто є насправді Путін! А те, що я прошу інших вікіпедистів розмістити фото на сторінку це Вас не повинно стосуватися! Це вже нагадує переслідування! А з приводу вашого "вірю-невірю" - мені якось байдуже! Я вам відповів і тому прошу Вас невдаватися знову до вандалізма! Живіть з миром!. --Jeromjerom (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    Dat is wel fijn dat je een lang gebruik dat ik geen bal van snap, maar dat is toch moelijk te ontkennen dat je een leugenaar bent. Ik hoop dat de sluitende administrator zal toch een otrs bevestiging eisen.--Ymblanter (talk) 13:59, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete - Very useful image (says a lot about the cultural level of some Ukrainian politicians), but I'm afraid it's stolen from the web and we cannot keep it here. --A.Savin 20:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I found the same photo published in Twitter before Commons (link) and it has note about author ("Kisa Ivanova", the OTRS letter received (2014062110007407) doesn't confirm authorship.  Delete rubin16 (talk) 08:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC) working on the permission rubin16 (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • my small investigation: I looked through publications of this photo through the Net, a lot of them attribute to ("Kisa Ivanova, durdom.in.ua"). I found that post in durdom.in.ua (link) where we see the full version of photo (link) and author "Kisa Ivanova" says that it's a source file. So, it's definitely not the work of Jeromjerom, it's likely to be fake at all (as source photo with full view shows another titles on the T-shirts), it seems that Jeromjerom is intentionally cheating with copyright and image info here: the initial version was mirrored (link), the image itself is cropped and magnified to make it more difficult to check original version of the file; furthermore, EXIF data were inserted but based on the full version of photo (my link above) those EXIF data, from my point of view, are fake. I think that image should be deleted and user blocked for intentional cheating rubin16 (talk) 09:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support. Я думаю, что следует оставить изображение. По крайней мере я вижу наконец-то EXIF-данные, которые вряд ли поддельные. --193.238.39.99 10:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete as fake. This photo is higher quality and looks like base for the photo under investigation, which is lower quality, and seems to be scalled up. It does not look like an original photo from a any camera. Ankry (talk) 12:41, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, that's 100% fake from this one. --A.Savin 13:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted per above. --A.Savin 13:24, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Deputati_UDAR.jpg&oldid=127320935"