Commons:Deletion requests/File:Borovice ožraná od poníků.jpg
Very bad quality, no encyclopedic value, unusable, someting in bottom right-hand corner Jagro (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion, part of campain at Czech Wikipedia. --Dezidor (talk) 15:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, something seems definitely wrong here, it's the third DR against you with the same bad quality argument. You should probably give some links/diffs to the "campain" on cz.wp, if you want an admin to look into it. --Tryphon (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Delete No encyclopedic value. Low resolution... This pictures in some article? Which? Next bad image... --Chmee2 (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2009 (UTC)- Keep No reason for deletion. This image isn't suitable as a title image of any article, but it is neither fatally horrible nor inutile. --ŠJů (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete really bad quality, useless --Daniel Baránek (talk) 08:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete --P.matel (talk) 08:33, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete bad quality (composition: no main object) --Packa (talk) 20:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- KeepPoor quality is not a reason to delete someones image.--Ltshears (talk) 00:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Weak keep. It is poorly lit and poorly composed, but a close crop of the flowers/catkins/seedheads may be useful to some educational project. --InfantGorilla (talk) 08:16, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete just another crap -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Useless image with poor quality. --Milda (talk) 22:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Comment New version of image was uploaded. Deletion request is not actual and it should be closed or restarted. --Dezidor (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]
Link is here what he thoug. But it is not campain against him, it is campain against horrible pictures on Commons. Just the problem that some of Dezidor's photos are bad... --Chmee2 (talk) 16:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link, I cannot understand the discussion there, but now someone who can would now be able to follow the whole story.
As of your campaign against horrible pictures, I'm not sure it is the best way to handle it. In most cases, images can be improved (like cropping for this one) instead of deleted. Also note that DRs are not votes: voting ten times delete with the same low quality reason will be regarded as just one argument when closing the request. --Tryphon (talk) 16:37, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
The campain is about a competition in number of uploads. Chmee2 created such a competition at cs:, but he is injured that he isn't the first. That is why he unleashed this queer fight "for quality". --ŠJů (talk) 02:27, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Chmee2 is nor injured, ŠJů. --Packa (talk) 20:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Kept. It may not be the best photo on Commons but I see no reason to delete on the argument that the photo is poor quality and that is has no encyclopedic value. This image can be used (It is categorised) and it can be improved with Photoshop, IrfanView or any other photo editing software. Also please keep disagreements on other Wiki's at those Wiki's and not here on Commons. Bidgee (talk) 06:59, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
