Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alberto Fujimori (1992).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alberto Fujimori (1992).jpg

Screenshot, COM:LL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:14, 26 December 2019 (UTC)

Patrick Rogel Screenshots can be taken of one's own work. I don't see the reason why this media should be deleted. Additionally, the original source of the photo is from the National Government of Peru. Chapter 5 Article 85 of the National Copyright Law in Peru states that media published by the Government of Peru is not copyrightable. I believe this is where the Flickr user might have derived the public domain license. Please feel free to comment further on this if you need clarification rather than blatantly marking the media I uploaded as copyrighted.

Another thing, Patrick Rogel has been stalking my talk page these past few months and I have asked him repeatedly to back off. By that, I mean he'll attempt to pull down anything I upload on Commons, regardless of the clarified copyright license I have searched meticulously on the image. For instance, he pulled down a couple of images that I cropped from a photo on Wikimedia Commons that already had a CC0 1.0 license AND was verified, and pulled down that image as well. He is welcome to communicate with me on his talk page, but is no longer welcome to publish anything on my talk page. The reason why I say this is because I wish this to be taken into consideration as well in the deletion plea of this file. Thanks, Happy Holidays. DoctorSpeed (talk)

Maybe I'm missing something, but Capitulo V Artículo 85 does not appear to have anything whatsoever to do with works of the Peruvian Government. My Spanish isn't anything to brag about, but it's good enough to spot administracion or gobierno. Article 85 appears to address the right of non-public persons to control the distribution of their likeness. GMG^talk 17:55, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

• I suppose  Delete pending any further clarifying information. Even if article 85 did what is claimed, and it doesn't appear to, we would still need a source for the file on Flickr, since it's pretty clearly not an original work. On Flickr, as it is here, merely claiming that a file is public domain isn't meaningful without information about what the sources is and why the source itself ought to be PD. GMG^talk 13:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

GreenMeansGo What I referred to looking back at Article 85, is the sentence that mentions "Sin embargo, la publicación del retrato es libre cuando se trate de una persona notoria o se relacione con fines científicos, didácticos o culturales en general, o con hechos o acontecimientos de interés público o que se hubieren desarrollado en público."

This translates to "However, the publication of the portrait is in free when it is a notable figure or agency or is related to scientific, didactic or cultural purposes in general, or to facts or events of public interest or that have been developed in the public sphere."

I'll verify with the Indecopi the status of the image. Any image that relates to this one is derivative of a screenshot of the original broadcast of the Peruvian government owned network in 1992.

DoctorSpeed (talk)

@DoctorSpeed: As I said, this does not appear to have anything whatsoever to do with works of the Peruvian government, but rather the rights of non-public figures to control the distribution of their likeness. My Spanish isn't anything to brag about, but I took two years of it in university. If you have a source that interprets this in relation to government works, you should provide it. Otherwise I believe you are simply mistaken in your interpretation of the implications of this law. GMG^talk 22:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination and User:GMG. --Green Giant (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)