Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/08/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 11th, 2024
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VIG4Ever SVG Logo.svg

[edit]

i want to delete my logo VIG4Ever (talk) 01:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: G7, F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:License review needed

[edit]

Possible violation of COM:FOP#Iraq.

MCMLXXXIX 15:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: If you see the Permission part in the these pages, you will find an Explanation about the permission of the Tasnim News Agency which states in its footer, and Per this Discussion "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License" and these cases have nothing to do with COM:FOP#Iraq.Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 12:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I find it very hard to believe that Tasmin News Agency would be the artist of the depicted artwork. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nuevo mapa turístico accesible de Madrid

[edit]

These files include maps, printed works, and software which was made available by the City of Madrid, but was likely produced by a third party with unknown copyright status.

Guanaco (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep No, the material was provided by the City of Madrid (...el Ayuntamiento, a través del Área de Turismo de Madrid Destino), so that the license is, in this case, perfectly valid. --Discasto talk 20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I follow here Discasto. The depicted material was apparently created by the tourist office of Madrid as claimed. Per COM:PRP we need significant doubt which has not been substantiated. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:05, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mercamadrid

[edit]

The City of Madrid is a major shareholder of Mercamadrid, but they are not the same entity, and it's unlikely that the city can simply license Mercamadrid materials without specific permission.

Guanaco (talk) 08:19, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As uploader. --Discasto talk 20:41, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:License review needed

[edit]

No evidence of permission. Original blog post has since been removed, but I couldn't seem to find any evidence of a free license in the archived version.

Yeeno (talk) 22:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FunyPlace on August 7th, 2024.png

[edit]

COM:SCOPE? Günther Frager (talk) 07:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Navid Mowri Bazofti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam files; cross-wiki spam.

SHB2000 (talk) 06:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Algol, Tragödie der Macht (1920) by Hans Werckmeister.webm

[edit]

This film is co-written by Fridel Köhne (1890–1966), so its copyright in Germany would not expire until 2037. hinnk (talk) 08:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Algol 1920.jpg

[edit]

Algol remains under copyright in Germany until 2037, since it is co-written by Fridel Köhne (1890–1966). hinnk (talk) 08:10, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sean Russell miller wearing a black jacket and white adult diaper on a blue background.jpg

[edit]

Should this be here? 50.24.234.11 13:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: LTA vandal. --Эlcobbola talk 13:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

St. Maria Lyskirchen

[edit]

The cat is already named St. Maria Lyskirchen (Köln) with subcats MenkinAlRire (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: This is not a category but a gallery. --Achim55 (talk) 18:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lyon-02.jpg

[edit]

pas de droits Bertrand Leforestier (talk) 11:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sivolc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but most have the actual author's name in exif, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:T20 World Cup 2026 Fanmade Logo.png

[edit]

This might include copyrighted content Sayantanp10 (talk) 13:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gay anal sex in lingerie.webm

[edit]

SD|G7 LucaAsherXX (talk) 20:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pics(1).jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Korom10 (talk) 21:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 21:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wewon Environmental Chambers.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Yann (talk) 21:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was uploaded by a sockpuppet of a blocked account for advertising purposes but maybe I shouldn't have tagged it for speedy deletion considering the file could've been of use, sorry. Delete anyway as a very likely copyright violation: this image appears in the 2016 video https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=03v4rpJugbg whereas this file was uploaded in 2020, same image was also uploaded to the company's Facebook in better quality ([1]) (but in 2022), so an "own work" claim seems dubious. Nutshinou Talk! 21:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fog_Bowl_1988.jpg

[edit]

"Image courtesy of NFL.com" Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:24, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: See the licensing template, which specifically addresses "courtesy of" images hosted on National Weather Service servers, stating in part:
“ "However, the NWS sites also host non-NWS images which have been submitted by individuals: these are generally shown as "Courtesy of ...". Such images have explicitly been released to the public domain by the copyright owner as part of the upload process...The information on government servers are in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise..." ”
Thus, this image became public domain once it was hosted on National Weather Service servers without a specific copyright notice. An example of images hosted on National Weather Service servers that have their copyright held can be found here, with the annotation shown. The page hosting this image has no specific copyright annotation, only the "courtesy of" tag referred to in the licensing template. Ks0stm (T•C•G) 04:45, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Ks0stm. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 21:16, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fog Bowl 1988.jpg

[edit]

The last deletion request of this file in December 2010 was withdrawn on the basis of the wording of the {{PD-NWS}} template, which we now know to be flawed. (See this recent DR for details.)

But this image in particular is credited by the NWS to NFL.com. The original image can be found here (you might need to click/swipe through to image 20/20 to find it.)

Unsurprisingly, the NFL's copyright policy is long, detailed, and restrictive. The version in force at the time this file was uploaded to Commons is archived here and says (among very many other things):

"We own or license all copyright rights in the text, images, photographs, video, audio, graphics, user interface, and other content provided on the Services, and the selection, coordination, and arrangement of such content (whether by us or by you), to the full extent provided under the copyright laws of the United States and other countries. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, you are prohibited from copying, reproducing, modifying, distributing, displaying, performing or transmitting any of the contents of the Services for any purposes, and nothing otherwise stated or implied in the Services confers on you any license or right to do so." (emphasis mine)

Without any evidence of permission where the NFL transferred their copyright of this photo into the public domain, we can't keep this file. Rlandmann (talk) 13:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Neutral I’m acknowledging WeatherWriter’s argument, but the NFL is real touchy about their copyrights, so I can’t give a support to keep or delete. ChessEric (talk) 06:13, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedily deleted by user:Yann for meeting F1 and F6 speedy deletion criteria. Non admin closure. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 23:21, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted my closure. Yann (talk) 19:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then we should assume that this discussion has been reopened. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 20:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment When was this photo published? Did it include a copyright notice or was the copyright renewed? If it was published in 1988 without notice or renewal it could be PD per COM:HIRTLE (specifically {{PD-US-1978-89}}). If published after 1 March 1989 it would still be copyrighted (I agree with commenters above that material from AP or NFL hosted by NWS is not automatically PD). Consigned (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC) Update: added vote delete below Consigned (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The bigger question first would be whether it was registered with the copyright office within five years. Even if it was published prior to March 1, 1989; it would still be non-free if registered by March 1, 1994. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 23:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And to add to @WestVirginiaWX (now @Hurricane Clyde) comment: it is likely to be very difficult to determine whether or not it was published within that three month window and not registered. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 17:43, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Good question, and I've put in a bit of research time to get an answer. Web sources don't help much, so I've tested the hypothesis that this photo appeared in newspaper coverage of the time.
    I checked the top 100 hits for contemporary coverage of this game on newspapers.com. The hits covered 61 separate papers, some of which ran coverage on multiple pages and/or over multiple days. Most of the newspapers I checked ran a photo from the Associated Press (not surprisingly; one example[2]), and a few ran a different one from the UPI newswire.
    But none ran this photo, and it's probably worth keeping in mind that this is possibly the least visually interesting or newsworthy photo taken of that game.
    If anyone wants to keep this photo on the grounds of its copyright not being properly registered, it's now over to you (per COM:ONUS) to show where this photo was published between December 31, 1988 and March 1, 1989. We can then investigate its registration status together. --Rlandmann (talk) 23:27, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment — NOTE: The NWS general disclaimer may be enough to keep the file. A recently closed deletion request for a file under the PD-NWS template was closed as keep with the main keep rational being the NWS general disclaimer. WeatherWriter (talk) 11:38, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    We are talking about the lawsuit-happy NFL though. Just saying. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 05:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    TBH, that shouldn't be relevant. The principle at play is whether we can be sure, beyond significant doubt, that the copyright owner surrendered their rights to the image, not "what can we get away with?"
    That's probably the part that has dismayed me the most about these discussions. Even before I decided to take a close look at this chaos, a doctrine had emerged that "Getty might get mad with us, we'd better respect their copyrights" while at the same time, being quite happy to ignore the rights of less powerful and less aggressive people and organisations, whose images the NWS captioned exactly the same way for the most part.
    It's even more problematic when some of them are small professional or semi-professional photographers trying to make some kind of income out of their images and whom a false public domain assertion here has far greater capacity to harm than the likes of Getty. Legal arguments aside, "can we get away with it?" is a wholly unethical position. (Not directed at you, Hurricane Clyde, but at a way of thinking that has emerged around these images). --Rlandmann (talk) 12:36, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I know it shouldn’t be relevant. But I decided to put that statement about the “lawsuit-happy NFL” because WeatherWriter continues to claim that the general disclaimer is enough; which is clearly and unambiguously not the case. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 20:32, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Furthermore @WeatherWriter; they renominated the file. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 02:03, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete No evidence that this is PD (taken by US Government employee, or published before 1 March 1989 without notice/registration/renewal {{PD-US-1978-89}}). Consigned (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:32, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camping Woman Naked A7h3nas.20110317.180424.000.000001306637.jpg

[edit]

Random nude photo, act as exhibionism, not educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


added all uploads to a single super-nomination: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by A7h3nas Dronebogus (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Julo. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camping Woman Naked A7h3nas.20110317.180406.000.000001235890.jpg

[edit]

Random nude photo, act as exhibionism, not educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


added all uploads to a single super-nomination: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by A7h3nas Dronebogus (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Julo. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camping Woman Naked A7h3nas.20110317.180324.000.000001269919.jpg

[edit]

Random nude photo, act as exhibionism, not educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


@A1Cafel: added all uploads to a single super-nomination: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by A7h3nas Dronebogus (talk) 08:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Julo. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fear Below promotional poster.jpg

[edit]

This is a non-free image which is not allowed on commons Filmforme (talk) 04:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the official promotional poster for the film that has been made available on IMDb and other websites promoting the film. Doctorcolin (talk) 07:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:THE-COST-One-Sheet-Website.jpg

[edit]

This is a non-free image which is not allowed on commons Filmforme (talk) 04:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the official artwork for 'The Cost' that has been made publicly available and permission is granted by Two Tone Pictures to use it. Doctorcolin (talk) 07:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Movie poster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Actress from the 1920s.png

[edit]

The description indicates that this image is from the film Easy Virtue (1928). Because the film is directed by Alfred Hitchcock (1899–1980), it remains copyrighted in its country of origin until 2051. hinnk (talk) 00:37, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:28, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martynbck (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claims, these look like professional shots. Additionally, even if own work, these would be impermissible derivative works of trophies with complex designs.

✗plicit 01:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:24yo Chinese Fully Erect human penis at 0-30° with cock-ring and effect of pde5.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Useless cock, useless exhibitionism. Taylor 49 (talk) 08:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Limp penis.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. CINAPA (Commons is not a penis album.) 186.172.193.153 21:58, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M. Combe.png

[edit]

Likely copyvio. Looks like a screenshot. No exif. C F A 💬 03:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:30, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Laura J. Balcer, MD.jpg

[edit]

Likely not public domain. TJMSmith (talk) 03:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Filiação-de-Axel-Gael.jpg

[edit]

copyrighted by PDT Paladinum2 (talk) 03:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Case 85 South Show Podcast 2024 1.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as no source (No source since) but was found Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:19, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL was updated since I put the nsd template on it. Since the source was updated see no reason to not keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Case 85 South Show Podcast 2024 2.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as no source (No source since) but it was found. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL was updated since I put the nsd template on it. Since the source was updated see no reason to not keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Case 85 South Show Podcast 2024 3.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as no source (No source since)but it has already been found. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL was updated since I put the nsd template on it. Since the source was updated see no reason to not keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Case 85 South Show Podcast 2024 4.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Diddykong1130 as no source (No source since) but it has already been found. Aurelio Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 05:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Source URL was updated since I put the nsd template on it. Since the source was updated see no reason to not keep. Diddykong1130 (talk) 14:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Slav Bakalov-2003-Opere in mostra.jpg

[edit]

Reproduction of copyrighted paintings. The painter died in 2019, these won't be public domain for a long time. IagoQnsi (talk) 06:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The photo is taken from the side and shows three paintings in the same image. Even the light is not real, but artificial light alters the colors. I don't think this photo could be a problem from a copyright point of view--Sampinz (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ROK 5th Infantry Division.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Lee6597 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F8 (Can be replaced with the high-quality vector version). This is not a reason for speedy deletion, so I create a regular request, which lasts a week. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The JPG is not just an JPG version, it is an significantly worse quality version. (Which should have been PNG (non photographic work)). No issues with attrubution, as the work itself is PD anyway. TheImaCow (talk) 15:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closed, file already Deleted and made into a redirect. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ROK 5th Infantry Division.jpg

[edit]

Bad quality dupe of File:ROKA 5th Infantry Division Insignia.svg, unused. Taylor 49 (talk) 07:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Senatni obvody 1 3n.svg

[edit]

Ununsed and apparently botched, redirected to different File:Senátní volební obvody 1. třetina.svg. Taylor 49 (talk) 07:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1 Fen - Russko-Aziatskiy Bank' - Kuldsha, Chuguchak, & Kashgar Branch (1913-1917) 01.jpg

[edit]

Exact dupe of File:1 Gold Candareen. Russo-Asiatic Bank. CINS0479o.jpg, identical pixelmap, just useless metadata (Adoobe Macrosoft) stripped off. Taylor 49 (talk) 07:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AEM alert screenshot 29 Jan 2023.jpg

[edit]

Not the submitter's own work. Copyright would be owned by Auckland Emergency Management, a subsidiary of Auckland Council. No obvious copyright license given for this or any AEM content but Auckland Council's website copyright forbids commercial use. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mena Massoud 2019.png

[edit]

Likely copyright violation. The source video is now private; the video page is archived, but the video itself was not. The description is visible, however, and it reads "mena massoud being himself compilation :)" This description suggests that the uploader compiled clips they found elsewhere, and was not the copyright holder. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:35, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Orchidaceen von Deutsch Neu-Guinea Tafel 180 (1928).jpg

[edit]

Dupe of File:Orchidaceen von Deutsch Neu-Guinea - Tafel 180 (1928).jpg (exept cropping of empty area). Taylor 49 (talk) 07:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kit socks rafaela2024a.png

[edit]

Exact dupe of File:Kit socks rafaela2021a.png, unused (identical pixelmap, differs only in physical size chunk). Taylor 49 (talk) 07:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kavčí Hory.jpg

[edit]

Způsob dokazování povolení autora se mi zdá složitý jak pro mě tak i pro autora. Nebudu tedy nijak dál prokazovat, že mám svolení a budu raději, když bude smazán. Astronaut ambi12 (talk) 08:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:36, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hoie1217 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own worked based on watermark and no exif

Gbawden (talk) 08:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BALINENI SRINIVASA REDDY.jpg

[edit]

The image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.myneta.info/AndhraPradesh2024/candidate.php?candidate_id=370 which may be a violation of copyright. The image lacks a proper free license or permission from the original creator, which is required for media files on Wikipedia. As such, it does not comply with Wikipedia's content policies. Kdslk (talk) 08:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alyssa Aska bowing after a premiere in 2021.webp

[edit]

Found online here https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=422107954057220&set=pb.100087740562760.-2207520000&locale=ur_PK and soundcloud before upload. Needs VRT to keep Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Фото Матвея.jpg

[edit]

Personal photograph of a non-contributor JBW (talk) 09:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:38, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by СЭЗИС (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mix of cameras, some have author info in exif, some watermarked, some from FB per MD. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 07:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 0821dho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source to verify the YT screenshots, the rest are from FB per MD

Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial (777c244c-cb74-4ced-9c29-ab3d06a406da).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 10:11, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed, as uploader. – BMacZero (🗩) 23:05, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bradergian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Film posters and others claimed as own work, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fairy26$bling (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All claimed as own work, PCP

Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Heiða 4 2021.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation. Uploaded as own work when it clearly isn't. Every other file uploaded by this user has been deleted as copyright violation. Bjarki S (talk) 10:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tyrannosaurus rex Coprolite Poozeum.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyright violation. Entry says " Photo courtesy of the Poozeum" and "Own work". These seem unlikely without some real documentation tracing it to the source with proper licensing. RoySmith (talk) 11:03, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This may be uploaded by a worker/owner, the uploader's former username was "Poozeum". The nominated image is also used here from Guinness World Records with a watermark. File:The Poozeum.jpg seems to be the image uploaded to Google maps [3] by Poozeum. File:Precious the Coprolite Courtesy of the Poozeum.jpg is similar to an image on the GWR site that is also used on the Poozeum website, but with different lighting. The file also has a courtesy note in the title and in the Summary section. Other images can be seen at Special:ListFiles/YetiStuff. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 11:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My previous username was Poozeum, and I am the owner of the Poozeum Museum in Williams, Arizona. I also own the copyright to this image and I posted it on Commons for people to use. You can view other images of this specimen on the Poozeum’s website: https://poozeum.com/t-rex-poop
There are no copyright issues with this image. Please remove the deletion request. Poozeum (talk) 13:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So it sounds like what this and the other images mostly need are a clearer statement of the provinance. We get lots of images marked "own work" which clearly aren't. If there was a link to where these images are on poozeum.com with a CC-SA-BY license statement, that would be irrefutable proof that the person who controlled that website was making the images available under that license. But I'll leave it to people who are more up on the details of commons licensing policy than I am to make the final call. RoySmith (talk) 16:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This issue was already raised with the uploader at en:User talk:YetiStuff#Couple of things. The user identified himself as George Frandsen, the owner of the Poozeum, and changed his username from User:Poozeum to User:YetiStuff after I pointed out that it might violate policy. This image and several others of coprolites were uploaded under CC-BY-SA from 2014 to 2000, while no article for the Poozeum existed until this year. gobonobo c 13:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The Poolzeum website gives no indication that its images are CC-BY-SA or any other copyleft licence. In fact, the opposite: [4] notes that Copyright © 2024 Poozeum, LLC - All Rights Reserved. The alleged owner of the site—who may or may not be the editor claiming so above—needs to contact WMF by the agreed channels and officially release the rights if he wants them to be hosted. They cannot host them here on a CC basis and copyright them on the website. In the meantime, and until such contact is made, the image should be deleted as (per COM:DEL) it has an unclear copyright status. Serial Number 54129 (talk) 10:29, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission now OK. --Yann (talk) 10:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Яремчук Назарій Назарович.png

[edit]

wrong date, probably copyright violation, see https://soundcloud.com/musicofindependence/larkjkk62edl?in=vvcsh5kwhs5q/sets/i-1 Xocolatl (talk) 12:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tadeusz Michejda - architekt.jpg

[edit]

No publicator date or publication in source page https://web.archive.org/web/20150628152854/http://nasz-janow.blogspot.com/2014/12/tadeusz-michejda-cenne-dzieo-modernisty.html - we can't use pd-anon ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We follow US case law in the absence of any contradictory EU law, that an image is "made public", when it leaves the custody of the creator. Tineye searched 65 billion images and could not find someone named as the photographer or someone making an active copyright claim, so yes we can say "Anonymous". --RAN (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:46, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michał Waszyński, reżyser, 1934.jpg

[edit]

no publication date, nor publicator, we can't use pd-anon licence ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Polish National Archive NAC claims that this photo was published in 1934 in "Ilustrowany Kuryer Codzienny" and claims that the author is institucion collective: "The Kuyer Ilustrowany Codzienny Team". In Europe, a collective author retains their copyright for 70 years from publication, so since 2005 this photo has been in the public domain in Poland. I don't have time to look through over 700 issues of this daily right now for this particular photograph -- but I have no grounds to dispute the information provided by the Polish National Archive NAC; especially since there have been several cases when I have looked for photographs in the years indicated by the NAC -- and I have always found them. Wieralee (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Michał Waszyński, reżyser, 1931.jpg

[edit]

no publication date, nor publicator, we can't use pd-anon licence ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Polish National Archive NAC claims that this photo was published in 1931 in "Ilustrowany Kuryer Codzienny" and claims that the author is institucion collective: "The Kuyer Ilustrowany Codzienny Team". In Europe, a collective author retains their copyright for 70 years from publication, so since 2002 this photo has been in the public domain in Poland. I don't have time to look through over 700 issues of this daily right now for this particular photograph -- but I have no grounds to dispute the information provided by the Polish National Archive NAC; especially since there have been several cases when I have looked for photographs in the years indicated by the NAC -- and I have always found them. Wieralee (talk) 15:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:49, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maria koterbska.jpg

[edit]

no publication date, nor publicator, we can't use pd-anon or pd-poland licence ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Zygmunt Kęstowicz.jpg

[edit]

no publication date, nor publicator, we can't use pd-anon or pd-poland licence ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Julian Tuwim.jpg

[edit]

no publication date, nor publicator, we can't use pd-anon or pd-poland licence ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We follow US case law in the absence of any contradictory Polish law, that an image is "made public", when it leaves the custody of the creator. Tineye searched 65 billion images and could not find someone named as the photographer or someone making an active copyright claim, so yes we can say "Anonymous". --RAN (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eufemiusz Herman.webp

[edit]

Obvious copyvio. Article is open access, but no evidence that photos is CC. ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:55, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1-F-3114-2-931x.jpg

[edit]

Obvious copyvio - unclear info about licence at fototeka site. ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Magdalena Samozwaniec 20-98.jpg

[edit]

no publication date, nor publicator, we can't use pd-anon or pd-poland licence ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep We follow US case law in the absence of any contradictory Polish law, that an image is "made public", when it leaves the custody of the creator. Tineye searched 65 billion images and could not find someone named as the photographer or someone making an active copyright claim, so yes we can say "Anonymous". --RAN (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:56, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Władysław Szpilman.jpg

[edit]

no publication date, nor publicator, we can't use pd-anon or pd-poland licence ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 12:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Standard publicity image, assumed "made public" at creation. Tineye searched 65 billion images and could not find someone named as the photographer or someone making an active copyright claim. --RAN (talk) 21:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 10:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KYP millstones Coombe Mill.jpg

[edit]

Probable copyright violation. The uploader has specified that this was taken from Bristol City Council's 'Know Your Place' website - here's the original, where there is no obvious indication that it is licensed CC-BY-SA as stated on the Commons page. I can find no evidence that Know Your Place content is routinely CC-BY-SA licensed, but they do state that Any information submitted to Know Your Place by a member of the public remains the property of the individual and is used on the website with their permission. Steinsky (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KYP No 83 Coombe Dale.jpg

[edit]

Same reason given as the nomination for File:KYP millstones Coombe Mill.jpg - suspected copyvio, no evidence provided for CC-BY-SA license. (Here is the original.) Steinsky (talk) 13:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Akihabara (9363669823).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Japan. This photo was taken in Akihabara, Japan, and Tetsujin 28-go is not in the public domain. IDCM (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pachinko parlor dsc04787.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Japan. This photo was taken in Japan and prominently features a poster depicting copyrighted characters. IDCM (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asramam Green Corridor East.jpg

[edit]

Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article PlayTesting (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not a selfie. --Yann (talk) 10:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files from Our Movie Guide

[edit]

Per previous discussion, Our Movie Guide videos are license-laundered: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Deadpool & Wolverine New York World Premiere Cast Arrivals.webm --Di (they-them) (talk) 14:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per above. BarntToust (talk) 12:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:00, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:François Furet.jpg

[edit]

Dubious license: Unlikely to be uploaders own work, impossible to be taken in 2023, given that the subject of the photograph died in 1997. Bujo (talk) 15:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Denis Richet.png

[edit]

Dubious license: Unlikely to be uploaders own work, impossible to be taken in 2023, given that the subject of the photograph died in 1989. Bujo (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ceteris Paribus Overview.png

[edit]

Out of scope (and unused); does not show what it purports to, per [5] Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete confusing Enhancing999 (talk) 21:20, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OldMcDonaldHadAFarm.ogg

[edit]

Undelete in 2028. A sound recording fixed in 1927 is copyrighted for 100 years after fixation. Please see the own license attached to this file. SDudley (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Сигурен погодок.jpg

[edit]

Duplicate of Во напад.jpg Rudermeister (talk) 16:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ericallums2007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jacknjellify and for other file i believe not notable. remove all plz

modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:05, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FC Logo (3).webp

[edit]

Out of com:scope. Jonteemil (talk) 18:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kittelfjäll view 2.jpg

[edit]

The file was accidentally uploaded using the incorrect version of Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike. Viroix (talk) 18:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: license OK, in use. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mumbo sauce.jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING, No evidence that the uploader is the copyright owner of the image on the package(s). ManOfTheArk (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Logo is simple. --Yann (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:God s garage.jpg

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, From Facebook, VRT requested https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nayer Nekkar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

{{No permission since|month=August|day=11|year=2024}}

CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TVC (2024-present).png

[edit]

copyright violation Masti (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: {{PD-textlogo}}, in use. --Yann (talk) 11:09, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Żywiec Zdrój.JPG

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of Halla Tómasdóttir (supposedly)

[edit]

Extremely poor quality. Could be anyone, face is not recognizable. Not usable, out of scope.

Gestumblindi (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:岐阜パルコ 2000年12月.jpg

[edit]

the license ( https://www.minoden.com/link/link-2.html ) is not compatible the CC-by-SA v3 (and / or COM:L). eien20 (talk) 20:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 鶴巻温泉 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

the license ( http://tamagazou.machinami.net/setsumei.htm ) don't permit commercial use.

eien20 (talk) 20:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

このふたつの建築物ですが「岐阜パルコ」はすでに閉店後解体され現存しません。「岐阜メルサ」はビルは残っていますが、すでに閉店しました。資料的価値のある物だと思いますので、残されることを望みます。 鶴巻温泉 (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
「商用利用が許可されていない」ため受け入れできません (参照: COM:L)。 資料的価値は問題ではありません。 --eien20 (talk) 20:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:11, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sinalepa kalmistu.jpg

[edit]

duplicate with smaller file - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sinalepa_kalmistu_2048.jpg Kalle Pihelgas (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: we keep the bigger file. --Yann (talk) 11:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paris2024 2019.svg

[edit]

Copyvio, official Paris Olympics logo which exceeds COM:TOO France. Consigned (talk) 22:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:13, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lothie Profile Photo.jpg

[edit]

Unused personal selfie of non-contributor, out of scope. Nutshinou Talk! 22:32, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamthe2fromBBC2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused imaginary flags, no educational purpose (COM:SCOPE).

Consigned (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Two “Footprints”.jpg

[edit]

The given author (w:Aaron Siskind) died in 1991; no evidence that he actually released this image under CC0 1.0 as claimed by the uploader. Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BitDATA Exchange.png

[edit]

COM:SPAM, promotional image uploaded by company; no usage, out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:53, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Beast 0085.jpg

[edit]

not in scope. Poor quality image. Ooligan (talk) 23:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:19, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street Art in Hongkong691.jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 03:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HK TuenMunCorp SalvationArmy.JPG

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:SaiWanOceanArt.jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Election russia 2007 003.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Campaña Randazzo.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reklama ŝildo de Vladimir Putin dum la prezidenta balotado.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kyjov volby 2018.jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Реклама Тягнибока — 2009 (1) (cropped).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peter Lindsay.jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Australia A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street Scene with Che Guevara Poster - Near Durbar Square - Kathmandu - Nepal (13443431255).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Nepal A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:41, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2012 Bukhara 7519974818.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street Scene with Movie Posters - Thanjavur - India.JPG

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Visitor (Griselda Ramirez) with Banner of Ayatollah Khomeini - Tehran - Iran (7383352872).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Iran A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Talk to Your Children about Sex - Billboard in Kicukiro District - Kigali - Rwanda.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ideas Not Ideology - Radio Flash Billboard - Karongi-Kibuye - Western Rwanda.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hindu Billboard, Valvettithurai.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Young Man outside Hair Salon - By Hazratbal Shrine - Srinagar - Jammu & Kashmir - India (26233670603).jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wind blowing away annoying election signs 0896 (9977664366).jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LEO VARADKAR AND NEOLIBERAL IRELAND (POSTER ON PARNELL STREET)-131324.jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LEO VARADKAR AND NEOLIBERAL IRELAND (POSTER ON PARNELL STREET)-131324 (cropped).jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hugo in the Field of Dreams (15460586859).jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:HUGO FOR MAYOR (15550612995).jpg

[edit]

Similar to UK, there is no FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Links Wählen Gregor Gysi - Wahlplakat October 1994.Wismar, Mecklenburg. (6479180377).jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jürgen Ott SPD Wahlplakat Oberbürgermeister Köln (22058342179).jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Suposed heir to the Presidency Bassel al Assad.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:London March 7 2017 (69) Stopthesilence Brexit (33180171781).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Electronic Advertising (12618854953).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Advertising in Dutchlish. (23575001782).jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Belfast-Irish-mural.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bobby sands mural in belfast320.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cartoon Mural, Belfast, July 2010.JPG

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bucky McCullough mural.JPG

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:51, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:43, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CS Lewis.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CSLewismural.png

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Collusion is not an illusion.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Duke of York, Belfast, July 2010 (10).JPG

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Duke of York, Belfast, July 2010 (11).JPG

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Duke of York, Belfast, July 2010 (12).JPG

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:58, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gedung walikota jakarta barat.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 10:01, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Landmark Centre Jakarta - panoramio.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grand Théâtre de Casablanca (CasArts).jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Morocco A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2019matsuri08.jpg

[edit]

Strictly speaking, source is the band and not the JMSDF. I don't think the {{GJSTU-2.0}} license applies here, as the band's website seems to be administered separately from the JMSDF's. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Salamander Motif on Wall - Vodun Voodoo Shrine - Abomey - Benin.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Benin A1Cafel (talk) 17:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:44, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Never Forget-Never Again - Mural on Facade of Enslavement and Civil War Museum - Selma - Alabama - USA.jpg

[edit]

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:45, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmadnejad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious own-work claim: small size, user upload history (also no FOP in IRAN).

4nn1l2 (talk) 17:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmadnejad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked 3 times for copyright violations, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:53, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by محمد قاسمی طبس (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User with bad history, small files without EXIF, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 12:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Fit India 14:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YcREX (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work as claimed. Mix of cameras with exif indicating author name and some with no exif.

Gbawden (talk) 08:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Max64958 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Needs proper licensing to keep

Gbawden (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Żywiec Zdrój water bottle.png

[edit]

Per COM:PACKAGING. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Ankry (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 04:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Weimar Republic Notgeld of Husum

[edit]

These German Notgeld (emergency money) bills from the 1920s are works of Max Böttcher, who died in 1966. So they are not in the public domain in Germany yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2037.

Rosenzweig τ 18:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:39, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:VSNC Old Temple.jpg

[edit]

Versions of this photo have been previously published elsewhere on the web, e.g. [6] - credited to "Vedanta Society of Northern California", and [7] - a YouTube upload by said society. The Commons uploader (with the original user name "Sfvedanta") asserts that they are the rights holder, but no evidence has been provided (see COM:CONSENT). Regards, HaeB (talk) 22:27, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 13:37, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2018 Venezuelan presidential election billboards.jpg

[edit]

Billboards are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


In Venezuela, government propaganda does not follow the typical rules of commercial advertising that we know. It is not a billboard that is installed temporarily and then taken down. Here, government messages become permanently embedded in the landscape, visible until they literally crumble with the passage of time. This type of propaganda, created by the government {{PD-VenezuelaGov}}, is designed to endure, not to be fleeting. Its continuous and public exposure throughout its useful life does not fit into the category of "temporary billboards". Wilfredor (talk) 03:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per Wilfredor. Electoral billboards in Venezuela stay in place well after the elections, just like murals, and I can attest to billboards from the 2008 regional elections (or the 2008 Summer Olympics, to give another example) still in place. --NoonIcarus (talk) 04:06, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment more examples --Wilfredor (talk) 17:59, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Closed as Kept per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:48, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wahlplakat zur Landratswahl 15. April 2018, Kreis Weimarer Land, Dr.-Ing. Julian Schwark, SPD.jpg

[edit]

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


The text below seems to say that there is no court decision yet but apparently it's fair to assume that it is legally possible to distribute photos of election posters:
"Für das Abfotografieren von Wahlplakaten gibt es ferner mit § 59 UrhG eine Sondervorschrift im Urheberrechtsgesetz. Diese besagt, dass „Werke, die sich bleibend an öffentlichen Wegen, Straßen oder Plätzen befinden“ abgelichtet und weiterverbreitet werden dürfen. Es gibt dabei eine juristische Diskussion um die Frage, was als „bleibend“ gelten kann. Da Wahlplakate in der Regel für mehrere Wochen im öffentlichen Raum aufgehängt werden und der öffentlichen Information dienen, gibt es gute Gründe anzunehmen, dass sie als „bleibend“ zu werten sind."
source: https://irights.info/artikel/urheberrecht-im-wahlkampf/32244
--KaiKemmann (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aren't they also destroyed right after the election? So one could say that they stay in a public place for all the time of their existence. Nakonana (talk) 22:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per COM:POSTER. The political posters are installed temporarily a short amount of time and the the intention of exhibition is strictly limited. They are not displayed after an election. There is a famous case in Germany, the Wrapped Reichstag [8], where the Supreme Court ruled that artworks in temporary exhibitions are not covered by FoP and determined that notion of "permanent" is partially subject to the author intention. Also, they ruled that the physical destruction after the exhibition was not relevant to consider it "permanent". I would add that for the case of posters what are destroyed are copies not the "artwork".
Also, there are plenty of DRs for election posters in Germany, all of them resulted in delete (there are only two ads related DRs in German FOP cases/kept). You can also check Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Election posters for the Bundestagswahl 2021 for a similar DR. If you don't agree with the apparent consensus, it would probably make sense create a discussion in the Village Pump to widen the audience. Günther Frager (talk) 20:56, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Derbent Muharebesi (1922) kronolojisi.jpg

[edit]

“found in a book” is not good enough to show this is out of copyright Chidgk1 (talk) 08:16, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Свјетлопис свјетлописа митрополита Амфилохија у крипти сербског православног храма Хрисовог Васкрсења у Подгорици,код гроба.jpg

[edit]

Derivative work. No permission from the authour of the original photography. Vanjagenije (talk) 09:36, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Niles Park Plaza 1985 tornado.jpg

[edit]

This file is different from other third-party images hosted on NWS servers that are the subjects of recent DRs. In this case, the source is explicitly given on the NWS page as "Unless otherwise noted, pictures courtesy ODOT District 4."

The Ohio Department of Transportation copyright policy states:

"Many, but not all, of the products and material the Ohio Department of Transportation produces are public records and are open for non-commercial reuse or duplication. Some items, such as the Official Transportation Map, are fully copyrighted, and reuse is expressly restricted.

Reuse of any and all material for commercial purposes is generally prohibited. Waivers to reuse material for educational purposes, and/or by non-profit or other governmental entities will be considered on a case-by-case basis depending on the source material and intended reuse. Accreditation to ODOT for appropriated material is requested." (emphasis mine)

Since we don't accept ,materials with non-commercial restrictions, we can't keep this. Rlandmann (talk) 09:39, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per above. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above - with the obvious caveat that ODOT may be willing to release this image into public domain and any editor is free (as always) to ask them to do so. But as of now, no evidence this is sufficiently licensed for Commons. Berchanhimez (talk) 23:42, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: Per the disclaimer linked at the bottom on the webpage, "The information on National Weather Service (NWS) Web pages are in the public domain, unless specifically noted otherwise, and may be used without charge for any lawful purpose...The information on National Weather Service Web servers and Web sites is in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public." Given this disclaimer, several reliable source media outlets use the photograph under a public domain license, even citing NWS or NOAA as the source for the image including: The Philadelphia Inquirer, Cleveland, US Tornadoes, and funny enough, the Ohio State Government uses the photo, citing the source as NWS. If the Ohio State government is using the photograph & says NWS is the source, it is public domain. WeatherWriter (talk) 23:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact others have violated its copyright does not mean we can do that. Commons does not rely on "implicit" evidence of copyright status as you want them to do. Berchanhimez (talk) 23:55, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I will give you a chance to strike and amend your statement, given you have put words in my mouth. Please strike/amend your statement to not attack me by putting words in my mouth. WeatherWriter (talk) 00:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I didn't say you said anything. You are using implicit evidence (such as other sources using the photo) - that is not acceptable on Commons as proof of copyright status. The mere fact other sources have also violated copyright does not mean we do on Commons. It is not an attack to point out that your statement was based solely on implicit evidence, which is not sufficient. Berchanhimez (talk) 00:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact that The Philadelphia Inquirer, Cleveland.com, US Tornadoes,(not a reliable source, but anyway...) and the Ohio State Government incorrectly attribute the image to the NWS should tell us something about the perils of relying on such third-party attributions. If, as you claim, the image was in the public domain, then the correct attribution should be "Public domain", and perhaps the ODOT as a courtesy. If, as I claim, the image is not in the public domain, then the attribution should be "ODOT" or "ODOT via NWS". But either way, "NWS" is demonstrably and obviously wrong and only exemplifies the unreliability of this approach to evaluating the copyright and licensing status of any of these images. --Rlandmann (talk) 00:55, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And plus; those newspapers could have gotten express permission from ODOT. Using that as a rationale would majorly go against the precautionary principle. That amounts to an “I can get away with it because it’s ‘common property’ and found all over the internet” argument. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 18:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    And furthermore @WeatherWriter, ODOT is owned by the Ohio state government. You can’t infringe on your own copyright. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 18:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Clearly we’ve got contradictory statements. Either the federal government is wrong or the state of Ohio is wrong. I think the latter is because it is east to confuse stuff on NWS servers for NWS created stuff (and misrepresent the NWS as the owner rather than ODOT); it clearly underscores the danger of such assumptions. WestVirginiaWX (talk) 18:40, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per WeatherWriter. ChessEric (talk) 06:21, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Niles Park Plaza 1985 tornado.jpg

[edit]

Renominating. I closed a previous listing for this thinking it was resolved, which seems to have been mistaken. [9]. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep For the following reasons:
  1. The image originates from this web site by the National Weather Service (NWS). The NWS noted the photo was, "courtesy ODOT District 4". Per the disclaimer linked at the bottom on the webpage, "The information on National Weather Service Web servers and Web sites is in the public domain, unless specifically annotated otherwise, and may be used freely by the public." We have confirmed evidence this image exists on a web site as well as the web servers of the National Weather Service (weather.gov).
  2. For the clause of “specifically annotated otherwise”, NWS either allows the user to add a copyright “©” watermark to the image {as seen in this image, hosted on this NWS webpage} or by directly adding a copyright statement using “©” {as seen on this NWS webpage: difference between the “Tornado Photos” and “Damage” tabs}. That disclaimer is linked at the bottom of all three of the NWS webpages linked above (this image’s webpage 2 I used as examples). To me, “specifically annotated otherwise” indicates a direct copyright (©) statement or watermark.
  3. The NWS disclaimer also states, "Third-party information and imagery are used under license by the individual third-party provider. [...] Please contact the third-party provider for information on your rights to further use these data/products." See instances of usage below:
To me, all the things above, along with the previous deletion request being closed as "Keep", point to this image being in the public domain. Arguments for possible deletion would have to argue RS media, with editorial reviews, along with the direct Ohio State Government, failed to actually follow the disclaimer and illegally "license laundered". If clear evidence of the aforementioned was presented, then my vote would switch to delete. However, I highly doubt RS media along with a state government would fail to follow the disclaimer in its entirety, which helps provide evidence that this photo is free-to-use. WeatherWriter (talk) 02:40, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete For the following reasons:
  1. Is not under dispute
  2. The idea that "specifically annotated otherwise" necessarily means a formal copyright notice is simply a fabrication, made up out of thin air by some commons contributors years ago. The NWS themselves have never made any such claim, and their actual practice is quite different from the "rules" that a few Commons constributors invented for them.
  3. The third-party provider in this case is the Ohio Department of Transportation. Per COM:ONUS, anyone wishing to keep this file should reach out to them and see if the image was ever released into the Public Domain or under a free license, or whether they would be willing to make such a release now. Without the explicit permission of the owner, it really doesn't matter what any fourth party has to say about the copyright or licensing.
  4. I don't think it's fair to use the closing admin's decision the way you are using it here; it was made on the basis of a different and far more limited set of information than we have available to us now.
Works of the state Government of Ohio are generally eligible for copyright,[10] and we have no explicit evidence from either the ODOT who created the image, or the NWS who published it, that copyright was ever relinquished. Nor do we have evidence that this image was published prior to March 1, 1989 without a copyright notice or registration, which would make it ineligible for other reasons. --Rlandmann (talk) 04:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To throw the question out there since we should cover all basis, what is our evidence ODoT is the photographer? NWS? We have the Ohio State government and RS media saying NWS took the photo. If you are arguing we cannot trust the NWS disclaimer, then why can we trust the NWS’s authorship? Why not trust the Ohio State Government, who says the U.S. federal government is the photographer? In short: Besides NWS’s word (which the deletion request is basically whether or not “their word” can be trusted), what proof do we have that ODot took the photo? WeatherWriter (talk) 04:28, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good question!
  1. The evidence is the NWS website, as the oldest and most independent source of this photo and its attribution, and which predates any of the other sources by at least five, maybe ten, years.
    Bob publishes a photo and says he got it from Anna. Five or ten years later, Carla, Dave, Edith, and Freddy come along, republish the same photo, and say they got it from Bob. The chain of evidence/provenance still points back to Anna as the original source of the image (as far as we can tell).
  2. We very definitely do not have anybody else (reliable or otherwise) saying that the "NWS took the photo". We have a bunch of sources saying that's where they got the photo. I don't see any of them making the claim that they got the image from the original photographer.
  3. I have never said that "we cannot trust the NWS disclaimer". I say we cannot trust one specific interpretation of it which is grossly at odds with observeable reality and which the NWS itself disavows. I have personally reviewed over 1,500 images spread over many hundreds of NWS webpages, and can point to only a handful of times I suspect they've made a mistake in an attribution. They are extraordinarily trustworthy.
  4. It remains possible that ODOT themselves got the image from someone else -- perhaps an EMA or private citizen. For the purposes of this DR, that's a distinction without difference, since it doesn't matter if we delete because we have no evidence that ODOT released the image into the public domain or whether we delete because we have no evidence that someone who gave it to ODOT released it into the public domain. The end result is the same.
Rlandmann (talk) 08:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I must take issue with the allegation against me, "The closing admin admitted that the last DR had been improperly closed by counting !votes instead of applying copyright law and Commons policy." I closed it according the information I had in front of me in the deletion request itself. I was at the time unaware of Commons:Requests for comment/Third-party images published by the National Weather Service and the listing did nothing to make me aware of the existence of such additional discussion elsewhere. As I stated on my talk page [11] "If there are other factors &/or you think my closure was wrong, I have no objection to reopening discussion." If the user has issues with me I suggest they bring it to my talk page, or if they think appropriate start a listing about me at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. Now if you please let's get back to discussing the copyright status of images without personal snark. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:36, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry Infrogmation. No snark was intended, but on a re-read, my words were indeed harsh. I've struck that comment and re-focused it on the actual rebuttal. That's my bad and I hope you can forgive me. --Rlandmann (talk) 20:00, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete. Image is sourced to ODOT and there is no evidence they aren't the creator of the image. It doesn't matter what you think about whether someone else would've violated the copyright intentionally or not. The bottom line is that there is more than enough doubt over its status that the precautionary principle applies. The fact that other people or organizations have not applied a precautionary principle of their own doesn't mean we can fail to do so also. The mere fact that others have failed to confirm the copyright status does not give us the right to do so. All of the arguments in the prior DR apply still and need to be considered by the eventual close of this discussion. Berchanhimez (talk) 07:30, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per WeatherWriter. No idea why this was renominated. Sir MemeGod ._. (talk - contribs) 06:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Because since it was first listed, we know a lot more about how the weather.gov disclaimer operates in practice.
    Examining third-party files on weather.gov that we know to be (or at least can be very confident to be) protected by copyright, we can observe that they are never attributed with formal copyright notices, but are generally credited "Courtesy of..." or "Photo by..." or something very similar.
    We now know that the long-standing belief that "specifically annotated otherwise" necessarily means a formal copyright notice doesn't marry up with what we actually see the NWS doing on weather.gov.
    There are really only two ways to reconcile the words of the disclaimer with what we see in actual practise:
    1. the long-standing belief is correct, but the NWS is incredibly, consistently bad at following their own rules, to the point where they practically never get it right. If this is true, then it's impossible to rely on the style of attributions on the site to tell us whether an image is in the public domain or not. or
    2. the long-standing belief is incorrect and "specifically annotated" just means attribution to a third party. If this is true, then it's impossible to rely on the style of attributions on the site to tell us whether an image is in the public domain or not.
    Rlandmann (talk) 14:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
     Delete per @Rlandmann and @Berchanhimez. Hurricane Clyde 🌀my talk page! 22:50, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More information

[edit]

I emailed ODOT on September 7 about this image. I did get a reply that indicated a willingness to release the image, but when presented with the release template, they stopped responding. (VRT ticket:2024090610010381)

See also

[edit]


Deleted: per discussion and the linkd RfC. --Krd 15:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shin hakodate hokuto 20221230215404 (52656159960).jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Japan. This is a statue of Kenshiro from Fist of the North Star in Japan. Although the statue takes up a small area of ​​the photo, it appears to be the main subject. IDCM (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom RodRabelo7 (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:51, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wappen VDSt zu Bremen.jpg

[edit]

Sehr wahrscheinlich kein eigenes Werk. Gründung 1993 oder 1893? Demnach: Copyright? GerritR (talk) 20:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1993 according to their website[12]. Nakonana (talk) 23:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:52, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vlach Pavel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Through years, the user uploaded many historical images (or their photos) stated as own work. They might be PD-old, but the real authors and sources must be provided correctly.

Gumruch (talk) 22:35, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete A lot of these would clearly be PD in the United States due to age, but it's impossible to know if they would qualify as public domain in the country of origin without the authors and/or dates of publication. --Adamant1 (talk) 05:33, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep to this indiscriminate low effort mass nomination. All photos I checked are in use (so you need strong arguments to delete, not just "some of them might not be PD"), and a large part are of people which died 100-200 years ago, so the photos are defacto obvious PD. Also I can't see any previous discussion with the uploader about this issue "through years". It is very likely that they state "own work", because they scanned/photographed the old PD work themself (as shown by the exif data). ~TheImaCow (talk) 22:09, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TheImaCow: On his talk page, the user was noted 3 times about wrong statement of "own work": 18 November 2020, 15 November 2023 and 23 January 2024 (this was started by an IP and the real author was later revealed). The uploader has been considered an experienced user so he should know the difference between own work and own photo/own scan. Initially I thought that just a few recent files was problematic but later I revealed that there are more than 400 files :( I tried to find dosens of them using Google and Tinyeye but it is very hard to identify the real author and/or date. Some of them are available via stocks such as Alamy etc and stated as copyrighted w/o providing original authors… Many of them are signed (eg 19th-century lithographs) so someone could identify the authors. But remember, if an artist was born in 1855 and was active (painted a picture or took a photograph) in 1873 as an 18-years old person and lived for 100 years, the artwork might not still be PD-old. Even if there is a consensus that I am fully wrong, the templates should be replaced: {{Own}} > {{Own photo}} and license tags {{cc-zero}} > {{PD-old}}. –Gumruch (talk) 00:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At least a few of these have the original creator information in the information field. For example, File:Zámek Třemešek (1).jpg notes that it is a drawing by J. E. Kastner from 1841. —Tcr25 (talk) 02:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I started to fix the licence tags on ~50 files that are clearly PD, went through maybe 80-100 files so far. ~TheImaCow (talk) 09:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Usage on other projects isn't a valid justification to keep images that either have a high chance of being copyrighted or at least we have knowing if they are either way because of bad sourcing. It's on the uploader to properly cite where they got the files from and who created them. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been slowly going through these, fixing the file information and licensing where I feel I can. Many of them should be eligible for {{PD-Austria}} as they are older photos. There are also several that from the information provided are old paintings that qualify for {{PD-art}}, but I haven't been able to fully determine where the painting is held or the other, more specific information. In both cases that many of the images are cropped from larger ones, it does make it difficult to search for them. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nicht löschen, das sind alte Bilder. Da gibt es keine Quellenangaben. Th. Wanka — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2001:16B8:B8C4:1600:F846:481F:9C51:CC21 (talk) 11:44, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus for bulk deletion; a number of licenses seem to have been fixed. No prejudging renomination of problematic individual or selected groups of images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:59, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lamine Yamal.jpg

[edit]

Non-free image, per here. BrazilianDude70 (talk) 14:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Tagged as "no permission" since September 4. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lamine Yamal.jpg

[edit]

No evidence of free license -- YouTube video license does not necessarily extend to thumbnail. Uploader notes that other thumbnails on this channel are indeed copyright violations – we must assume this may also be a copyright violation per COM:PCP. IagoQnsi (talk) 07:47, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Sorry to say but this is not a screenshot from aforementioned video: on the video the embedded red logo is located in the right bottom corner while on the photo the red logo (not the same) can be seen in the right top corner. Consequently, we don't know the copyright owner and the original license. Deleted with all derivative works. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:53, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dieter Matthes 2023.jpg

[edit]

Nicht eigenes Werk. 186.172.231.218 20:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for allegation offered by anon. Looks consistent with other uploads by user. (No prejudging relisting if specific evidence of false license is shown.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dieter Matthes 2023.jpg

[edit]

Photo of a photo. COM:PCP 186.173.86.199 22:26, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file description says that the photo was taken in the Beyond Reality Galerie, which is located at Schlüterstraße 70 in Berlin [13]. The Exif data of the file give the coordinate location of Schlüterstraße 12-16 in Berlin. According to Google Maps the distance between Schlüterstraße 70 and Schlüterstraße 12-16 is six meters (or 19-20 ft)[14]. Why should one take a photo of a photo when the subject of the photo is standing right next to you..?
 Keep The reason for deletion does not sound plausible. Nakonana (talk) 23:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:FC Torpedo Moscow

[edit]

Possibly above COM:TOO Russia#Logos which is unclear. Two of these files are licensed as {{PD-art}} but I think that license too needs to be verified.

Jonteemil (talk) 18:49, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've found an archived page[15] of the given source in File:Logo torpedo.png, but all it seems to say is that the club took on the name "Torpedo" in 1936, but not that it's the time that the logo came to exist or that Вячеслав Орлов (Vyacheslav Orlov) was the author of the logo. This website does state that the logo was created in 1936. And this site names Orlov as the author (however, this source might not qualify as a reliable source). Orlov died in 1995 according to Russian Wikipedia[16]. This doesn't sound like the PD-art license is justified. Nakonana (talk) 22:51, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:30, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kate bush 1978 1 (cropped).png

[edit]

Is a screenshot from a TV interview. Which was released with permission from the interviewers estate but it is unknown who the copyright holder is, and whether they consent to the video being released under Creative Commons Mewhen123 (talk) 20:52, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yaohnanen qəbiləsinin kişiləri Fillip şahzadənin fotoşəkilləri ilə.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Atakhanli as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 07:14, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Художньо-меморіальна дошка на будинку, в якому жив С.П. Людкевич.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 1991. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 10:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alessio Cigliano con Ken il Guerriero nel 2023.jpg

[edit]

Per COM:FOP Italy. This photo was probably taken in Italy. Although the main subject is the actor, the Fist of the North Star illustration also takes up a large part of the photo. IDCM (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Rose window in St. Roch Church in Białystok (interior view)

[edit]

Stained glass project by w:pl:Placyda Bukowska, died in 1974. No FoP in Poland.

ايمو کي ڀڄايو (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Franciscus-Geneva-2018-r.jpg

[edit]

And File:Franciscus-Geneva-2018-v.jpg.

Missing evidence that the uploader is the coin sculptor Daniela Longo. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:30, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kentro-texnis-politismou.jpg

[edit]

Way too recent as a bulding/structure in order to fall out of copyrights, since there's no FOP in Greece. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 06:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:16, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reinhard Stangl 2014.jpg

[edit]

Kunsthaus Koldenhof. Google Lens will help you. 186.173.86.199 22:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sehr geehrtes Kunsthaus Koldenhof
Ich wollte nur kurz fragen, was an der Fotografie von Reinhard Stangl nicht in Ordnung ist? Ich bin der Urheber dieser Fotografie...
Über eine Antwort würde ich mich sehr freuen.
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Christian Schneegaß CS Photo Artist (talk) 08:37, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Das Problem ist, wie auch beim Foto von Wolfgang Petrick, der im Foto zu sehende Teil der urheberrechtlich geschützten Werke der jeweiligen Künstler. Ein solches Foto braucht zwei unabhängig erteilte Lizenzen, um hier veröffentlicht werden zu können: Eine vom Fotografen (die du als Urheber beim Hochladen erteilst) und dazu eine zweite Lizenz der jeweiligen Künstler als Rechteinhaber der Werke für deren Abbildung im Foto. Das Vorgehen zur Erteilung der Erlaubnis durch die Künstler hat dir Rosenzweig oben verlinkt. Vor einem neutralen Hintergrund wären beide Fotos mit nur deiner Lizenzierung als Urheber verwendbar in Wikipedia, so sind sie dies leider nicht. Uschoen (talk) 17:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The background is arguably de minimis, as there isn't very much of it and it's deliberately blurred. It could be blurred a bit more if that's really necessary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Ikan Kekek, the background is clearly COM:DM, as the focus of the image is obviously the artist, not the atwork in the background. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: further cropped background. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Neon Genesis Evangelion.png

[edit]

Japanese logo, likely exceeds COM:TOO Japan. The styling to me has "artistic appearance that is worth artistic appreciation". Consigned (talk) 22:41, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

幾何学的な図形や文字のみで構成されているので、創作性の基準は満たしていないと私は思います。 バケラッタ (talk) 00:27, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since it is composed only of geometric shapes and letters, I believe it does not meet the criteria for creativity.
translator: Google Translate Consigned (talk) 09:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wolfgang Petrick in seinem Atelier 2022.jpg

[edit]

DW. Painting needs permission from the painter. 186.173.86.199 22:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

...da ich der Urheber dieser Fotografie bin, kann es ja eigentlich nur an irgendeiner Richtlinie liegen. Welche Richtlinie habe ich hier denn nicht eingehalten? Der Künstler sitzt vor seinem Werk, muß ich das dazu schreiben? CS Photo Artist (talk) 08:40, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ich kann nicht Deutsch sprechen. The Ol'Achim kann. 186.173.86.199 12:51, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CS Photo Artist: Wir brauchen eine Genehmigung des Künstlers (von ihm selbst, per E-Mail), dass sein sehr prominent im Foto zu sehendes Gemälde unter eine freie Lizenz (wie die des Fotos) gestellt werden darf. Details, Adresse, zu verwendender Text siehe COM:VRT/de. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 09:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Während des Fototermins war das sogar auch Thema, Petrick meinte: Wenn ich als Künstler davor sitze und mich fotografieren lasse, ist automatisch die Freigabe erteilt, dieses auch zu nutzen.
Verzeihen Sie bitte die späte Antwort... CS Photo Artist (talk) 09:50, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CS Photo Artist: Unsere Richtlinien sehen vor, dass wir das explizit schriftlich (bzw. per E-Mail) vom Urheber selbst wollen. Konkludentes Einverständnis und dergleichen reichen nicht. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 09:57, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wolfgang Petrick ist zur Zeit sehr beschäftigt, ich werde ihn damit jetzt nicht belästigen. Der Künstler sitzt vor seinem Werk, wenn es tatsächlich gegen die Richtlinien von Wikipedia verstößt, löschen Sie es einfach. Das letzte was ich möchte ist, gegen irgendwelche Richtlinien zu verstoßen, vielen lieben Dank. CS Photo Artist (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I cropped the image to only include the painter, remaining artwork in the background fall under {{De minimis}}. ~TheImaCow (talk) 13:30, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. Accd. to the very restrictive 2014 decision (see COM:DM Germany) from Germany's highest regular court, the Federal Court of Justice, this is not unwesentliches Beiwerk, which is the German version of de minimis. --Rosenzweig τ 13:56, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 18:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Tux_icons based on Tux-G2.png

[edit]

The license for Tux-G2, which these images are based on, is non-commercial only as indicated in this previous deletion request. A similar request was also filed in 2017. --Anwon (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and previous DRs. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:32, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/08/11&oldid=957190950"