Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/07/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 3rd, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Michaelsandip (talk) 00:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Michaelsandip (talk) 00:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio, definitely not own work Enyavar (talk) 04:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Greenricegoddess (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Greenricegoddess (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Greenricegoddess (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio, the user was removing original background. Origanl image can be here Wiki Farazi (talk) 08:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Иной автор Ил Т (talk) 09:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RitikaPahwa4444 (talk) 09:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RitikaPahwa4444 (talk) 09:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake RitikaPahwa4444 (talk) 09:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, found on internet JohnNewton8 (talk) 13:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 14:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, photo was created by Daniel Domazer: https://www.instagram.com/p/CsHT5nDN-Yg/DerHexer (Talk) 14:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Michaelsandip (talk) 15:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Michaelsandip (talk) 15:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as it's just a back square. --Túrelio (talk) 17:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Regions of the Floridian State.png

Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:1937:8B3C:AC39:60F1:6826:5C01 01:16, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wutsje 03:43, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Regions of the Floridian State.png

Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:1928:4B05:AC39:60F1:50A9:1ECE 14:17, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Uploader's request, vandalism by a known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 14:59, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Regions of the Floridian State.png

Ggggggggggfttttftttttttfttt Bastianmalata (talk) 23:32, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No se cansa nunca de vandalismo?! 191.125.50.26 00:10, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Uploader's request, vandalism by a known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 13:25, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Regions of the Floridian State.png

Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:197D:89A0:AC39:60F1:FDC0:6E30 15:38, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Uploader's request, vandalism by a known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 15:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Regions of the Floridian State.png

Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj 2607:FB91:C1B:1777:AC39:60F1:FACB:8DE4 15:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: as usual. --Achim55 (talk) 17:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:Regions of the Floridian State.png

Jkkkkkkkkkjj 2601:58A:8E81:DBD0:4128:A298:5A21:E65 18:41, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: as usual. --Achim55 (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uuuuuuuu 2607:FB91:19FC:CDC5:AC39:BE31:E281:2E81 17:51, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Vandalism by known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hhhhhhhhhhhhhya 172.56.78.206 17:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Vandalism by known LTA from Florida. --Achim55 (talk) 20:34, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete file Michaelsandip (talk) 13:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 20:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from his social media account Bahnmoeller (talk) 20:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 21:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nguimatsia Alixone (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The embedded maps are taken from Google Maps, which are copyrighted.

Belbury (talk) 12:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvios (also most of these were nominated separately by the uploader shortly after upload). --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 13:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Nguimatsia Alixone (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lizenz fehlt und kann nicht beigebracht werden. Janina Poesch (talk) 17:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of Kim Possible Trade (talk) 12:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — T. 10:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as an unused logo. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|accidental creation}}
Timokpaa (talk) 12:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/hoyte_van_hoytema/pictures Xocolatl (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 16:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copvio -speedy. --Herby talk thyme 13:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 13:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, see source Xocolatl (talk) 17:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:00, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:03, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio - speedy. --Herby talk thyme 14:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This emblem is not a government emblem which be published on the government's document. This one is a foundation emblem which be fully protected by the foundation right. Refer to the link: Foundation website, it reads "© 2019 The Princess Mother’s Medical Volunteer Foundation | All Rights Reserved.". Wutkh (talk) 03:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Wikitanvir. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is likely a copyvio. It appears to be a photograph of a screen. Denniscabrams (talk) 01:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete That is definitely a screen photograph. 20 upper 09:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:07, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Funko Pop toy figures of (mostly) Marvel characters are still subject to copyright per COM:TOYS. Toys themselves are most likely recent. George Ho (talk) 01:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The toys are unquestionably recent; the Funko Pop product line has only existed since 2011. Omphalographer (talk) 02:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sourlemon2103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictional content. (Per uploader: [The subject of the logo] is a fictional party. I uploaded it for worldbuilding purposes. Flag appears to be similar.)

Omphalographer (talk) 02:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:24, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random penis photo, poor composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Terrible image. 20 upper 09:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:25, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 05:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 09:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:12, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Venkyapple1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

book covers, unlike that own work. File:Kasetra.jpg is from Internet, unlike that own work. File:Kastheyom.jpg is collage with images of unknown source/author

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is an obsolete copy of the up-to-date File:Visa requirements for Russian citizens-svg.svg. This map can be safely deleted as nothing links to it and the information in it is very outdated. Maphobbyist (talk) 14:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:05, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We no longer use this file. Lades2222 (talk) 08:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This is not a valid reason to delete the file. Period. Moreover, you (Lades2222) just created a duplicate of the original that has a well-established pattern of usage and a long history of updates (File:Visa requirements for Russian citizens.svg), then replaced a link to it with your newly uploaded image - which goes contrary to both spirit and letter of the rules, as you should have just uploaded a new version of the well-established image if the updates are reasonable. And now you pretend that the original has no more use. I suggest you follow the customary process of incremental updates to the well-established image. Cherkash (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I see. Lades2222 (talk) 13:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It is using in Russian and English Wikipedias. Keep.--Alexander Roumega (talk) 08:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nieaktualna wresja herbu Gminy Cewice, od 2011 obowiązuje nowy herb Promocja2020 (talk) 10:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep That there is a new version of the coat of arms is not a reason to delete the old one. --Rosenzweig τ 11:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:31, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

El archivo no es de mi autoría. Aunque es una fotografía de uso público no es de mi autoría. Reconzco que comití vario errores. Mega809 (talk) 11:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este archivo lo hizo una persona que conozco a petición mía. Aunque la creó para mi hace un tiempo, no es en sí de mi autoría. Pediré una autorización legal para poder volver a subirla acá. Mega809 (talk) 11:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La fotografía la realizó un camarografo para mi. La solicité por correo electrónico a la institución y fue creada especialmente para mi, pero no me convierte en su autor. Más adelante solicitaré un permiso en esa empresa para entrar al set y hacerla ya sea desde mi dispositivo móvil. Mega809 (talk) 11:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No la hice yo, por lo que no es de mi autoría. Mega809 (talk) 11:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es de mi autoría. Mega809 (talk) 11:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La hice yo mismo. Viene de una entrevista, pero no tengo cómo demostrarlo. Mega809 (talk) 11:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es mi autoría. Si algún día coincido en alguna actividad con él le pediré permiso para hacerle una, o que más adelante la suba alguien con más experiencia que yo con el tema de los copyright. Mega809 (talk) 11:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito su eliminación porque no cree yo la fotografía. Mega809 (talk) 11:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 11:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above threshold of originality? Trade (talk) 11:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No hice la fotografía pero el autor me la cedió. Le solicitaré una licencia o que la suba él directamente. Mega809 (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No hice este archivo. Aunque es de uso comercial. Aprenderé a subie archivos con las licencias. Mega809 (talk) 11:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:34, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Se puede eliminar. Es de uso libre pero se puede eliminar y puedo conseguir la licencia del archivo más adelante. Mega809 (talk) 11:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La realizó un periodista que conozco en la Cámara de Diputados en aquella época. No tengo sus derechos. Mega809 (talk) 11:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La realizó un periodista que conozco que trabaja para el congreso nacional, pero no tengo sus derechos aunque haya sido creada para este uso. Mega809 (talk) 11:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despúes de haber creado el artículo le escribí por las redes sociales y personalmente me hizo llegar esta fotografía, pero no es de mi autoría. Mega809 (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No se cómo añadir los derechos de la licencia creative commos. Mega809 (talk) 12:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Question @Mega809: You're nominating many files you have uploaded yourself, claiming them to be own work. Are you saying that they are, in fact, not your own work? Can you give the real source? --PaterMcFly (talk) 15:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Si, puedo, pero no sé hacerlo y ya me la han marcado para su destrucción. Entonces lo mejor que puedo hacer es desistir. Mega809 (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per code in metadata obviously copied from Facebook. Delete --Túrelio (talk) 07:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La solicité a un amigo periodista en el congreso en aquella época, Mega809 (talk) 12:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo cree el artículo porque es un empresario famoso en el país y sus aportes a la economía a través de su entidad. Lo que puedo hacer más adelante es solicitar la licencia creative commos adecuada. En 7 días me es imposible obtenerla. Mega809 (talk) 12:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Queda prohibido reproducir, transmitir, modificar o suprimir la información, contenido u advertencias de esta web sin la previa autorización escrita de BANCO POPULAR DOMINICANO, S.A." = copyvio.  Delete. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by krd as No license since 30 June 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos should be uploaded locally HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free logo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:38, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Interior of a copyrighted 3D artwork. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Song of Forest (2nd nomination) for details. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:04, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:40, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Renominating, see final closure of Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Song of Forest. The structure is meant for aesthetic purposes and not for mere human habitation or shelter. The structure itself does not contain a roof that would have made it suited for human habitation. So all in all this is a 3D artwork that violates sculptural copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Considering the gif was taken directly from the Powerpuff Girls animated series i feel a bit wary about having it on Commons Trade (talk) 14:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if there's a rule or policy applying to this (I was very young when I uploaded this file), but even if it's taken from the TV show, heart shapes can't be claimed as original work. I've seen movie title cards as simple as text over a color background stay on Commons, so my guess is that the same can apply to this. It's just heart shapes on loop. By any means, I'm not against the deletion of this gif. I think it's expendable. JBOOK17 (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - it's not just a simple shape, it's a complex animation of a simple shape. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oscar Seidel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

As before: out of scope; plain text content, primarily self-authored fiction.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete COM:OOS A09 (talk) 14:40, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 05:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and uncategorized file. Promotional. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover. Unlike that own work. VRT-permission from the illustrator is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks not a basic shape Kurmanbek💬 19:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KačkaVelichová (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused files. Easily recreatable. Per COM:NOTUSED.

Estopedist1 (talk) 19:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. VRT-permission from the author is needed. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Given the warning at es:User talk:Sexelislaif, this drawing is probably out of scope anyway. Omphalographer (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, COM:WEBHOST. Out of project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 04:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 04:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Bosnia and Herzegovina A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Sri Lanka A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 05:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for indoor works in Albania A1Cafel (talk) 11:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The redirect is very misleading, because it points to flag of Spain. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The redirect is very misleading, because it points to flag of Spain. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size, low resolution, missing EXIF, can be found on various sites (Google Lens), unlikely to be own work Polarlys (talk) 11:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentifiable blur - can't tell whether it's a gull, or a raptor, or what. No conceivable use, thus out of Commons scope. MPF (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Obras derivadas -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A 1979 photograph would not be public domain yet in Afghanistan, it would become public domain in 2030 if published in 1979. Abzeronow (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1948 photograph from a photographer that died in 1961. Per https://www.christian-claude.com/corsofleuri1949.html "The absence of mention on a photograph, an article does not mean that they can be used freely" (translated from Google Translate to check on my elementary knowledge of French). Won't be public domain in France until 2032, and not in the US until 2044. Abzeronow (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see any indication in the report which is still hosted on a government site or on IHEP's website https://www.ihep.org/ that they license their work as Creative Commons. IHEP is not a government organization. Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Es una fotografía de uso libre pero no se como agregar los derechos. Mega809 (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 06:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal ideas on using technology in education. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal CV/resume. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 14:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

General defination of international treaties. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Student essay about international law. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal resume/CV. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Miss Amin (Owner) does not answer. Therefore no license since June 7, please delete עפרה「Ofra」 14:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Miss Amin (Owner) does not answer. Therefore no license since June 7, please delete עפרה「Ofra」 15:01, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 06:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text content. Omphalographer (talk) 16:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:46, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fallnlllunlnlml7l (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: nonsense. (These images look superficially like Arabic text, but don't appear to convey any meaning.)

Omphalographer (talk) 18:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fallnlllunlnlml7l (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: additional nonsensical images similar to those previously deleted.

Omphalographer (talk) 02:48, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & previous; clear case. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay on learning. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 19:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See wikidata:Q1690405 — Joachim Rieß is still alive. If there are any files that are PD for any other reason (COA-Germany, PD-ineligible, etc.) please cross them out and put a reason.

Als amtliches Werk ist diese Briefmarke nach § 5 Abs. 1 des deutschen Urheberrechtsgesetzes gemeinfrei (das gilt auch für die weiteren amtlichen Briefmarken von J.R.). Keep.--Gordito1869 (talk) 07:51, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hier greift die Panoramafreiheit.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Diese beiden bestehen im Wesentlichen aus der Wiedergabe eines Selbstbildnisses von Caspar David Friedrich, der 1840 starb. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wiedergabe eines Bildnisses von Emil Stumpp (1886–1941). -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wiedergaben alter Briefe ohne bzw. mit abgelaufenem Urheberrecht, ansonsten {{PD-ineligible}}.  Keep. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Fitindia (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright on these maps belongs to the Louisiana DOTD. See COM:CRT/US#Works by the US Government ("This does not include governments of the individual states.").

As an additional note, disclaimers at the DOTD the time made clear commercial reproduction was not granted without express written consent (link).

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 03:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo from 1915 is obviously not own work. We need a proper source — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:19, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its very old Ali Abdulqadr Razany (talk) 00:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Since you're the uploader. 20 upper 09:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: courtesy deletion and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nudity, low quality, limited value, the only upload by user, probable vandalism. Not used on any Wiki. MtBotany (talk) 03:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It has some educational value; it just seems that you dislike it. 20 upper 09:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I disagree that this is low quality. We have much worse. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That means we have much better ones than those you know. When are you planning to propose the deletion of those bad images? 186.172.104.107 23:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep We don't have many photos about vaginal creampie. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep perfectly fine image Dronebogus (talk) 10:27, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Western penis? Is it blond? Hypocrite? Has double standards? Delete. 186.172.104.107 23:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, we have enough penis pics. --Gbawden (talk) 18:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly likely this is a copyrighted file since the metadata points it out as "screenshot". It appears to be a cropped file. Rejoy2003(talk) 05:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was taken from [1] (the source page on April 26, 2016). There is no CC license there, the photos are said to be for press use. So this is a copyvio and should be deleted. Rosenzweig τ 06:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from https://uudb.org/authors/spencerlavan.html. Not own work Estopedist1 (talk) 06:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like not own work, but professional promo photo. Small size, no metadata, probably copyright violation. Estopedist1 (talk) 06:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:42, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

fake diagrams, misleading data. West Bengal assembly has 294 seats

Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own works, no source, wrong license.

Yann (talk) 08:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:46, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marxist Economist (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Meaningless and likely fictitious political diagrams – see previous mass DRs of this user's files.

SHB2000 (talk) 06:05, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also in the same vein:

Enyavar (talk) 10:54, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by The Squirrel Conspiracy. --Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, copied from Livejournal.--Xrtls2 (talk) 09:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keep for now, been on commons since 2011. Unless we can prove it was online before then AGF. --Gbawden (talk) 18:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aiman Zaharuddin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

small file size and resolution, removed background, missing EXIF, unlikely to be own work (user has a history of uploading similar unfree files)

Polarlys (talk) 09:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The Model is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyright violation from the YouTube video given in the source. Antimuonium (talk) 16:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The video displays this license in the description: Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed) Starklinson (talk) 19:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I must have went too fast as I didn't see that (adding a non-freely reusable image on the article fr:Maggie Lindemann already happened). It must be okay then. Antimuonium (talk) 21:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 18:38, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nearly identical with the File:Hochspannung - 01.jpg RandomDuck5000 (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:37, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 200.111.222.163 17:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:36, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Dubious clain of free pic CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The purported author of this photo is also the subject of the photo. It's likely a copyvio. Denniscabrams (talk) 20:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Trade as no permission (No permission since). Self-portrait per claim on COM:UNDEL, converting to DR to discuss COM:SCOPE. King of ♥ 20:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image have been published elsewhere before Commons so VRT is needed Trade (talk) 20:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Now has OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 18:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. The file is not in use since 2016. Per COM:NOTUSED. Estopedist1 (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality Luda.slominska (talk) 20:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately this file, although in widespread use on numerous pages, is not freely licensed; the license on the linked source page at the time of upload in mid 2007 is clearly stated to be non-commercial: 2007 archive. MPF (talk) 21:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're right: let's delete this file. Thank you very much for your attention and I apologise for this error. In my defence, this upload was made in the prehistory of my early contributions. I no longer make these kinds of big mistakes. Regards. --Abalg (talk) 09:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atoms. Replaced by File:2-(Trimethylsilyl)ethanol-2D-structure.svg as high-quality version. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio Fotographer Calebe Simões Lutheraner (talk) 22:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I trust a cyber expert like Hyppönen to know what he's doing giving a free license to a photo. The interface of Flickr just doesn't allow you to put the name of the photographer in the author field. Vera (talk) 22:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, we need the permission from Simoes. --Gbawden (talk) 18:21, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is labelled as being based on File:Dun Baravat - geograph.org.uk - 622831.jpg, but there is no obvious similarity between the pictures. Google Lens, however, finds a very similar photo on https://www.visitscotland.com/info/see-do/bernera-museum-p1424221 (number 13 in the gallery; direct link: https://d138ppwnkc9wzq.cloudfront.net/wsimgs/P5120051_64305507.JPG). That page gives no indication that the file is free, so I think it should be deleted as a non-free file. bjh21 (talk) 22:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:30, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not even sure if this is Rhys. Date stamp says 1 January 2000, 01:00:19. Sam Sailor 22:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Definitively is the assistant coach of the London Broncos, and that camera turned on for the first time in long time gave a very generic time.Fleets (talk) 06:55, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 18:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offensichtliche Fehllizenzierung als "Eigenes Werk" - Bild soll die Hochladerin zeigen, es handelt sich aber ganz offensichtlich nicht um ein Selfie Lutheraner (talk) 22:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, PCP. found elsewhere on the web. --Gbawden (talk) 18:20, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a preface: I do not expect a deletion to be the outcome of this DR. I simply cannot think of another and more suitable editorial quality assurance process.

I came across a renaming request. As it was in a non-latin script, I put the words into Google translate - and ended up quite puzzled. The suggested filename "Подорожник - Заказник Нагольний кряж" gives "Traveler - Customer Nogolny kryaz", the original filename sounds similar (instead of "Nogolny", it has "Nagolny"). Both names look as they do not comply with our file naming guidelines. I will not approve a file renaming that has the appearance of aiming to switch from one nonsensical name to another; I could not make out what the file provider wanted to say.

So, to reach out to a broader population of people that may provide held, I settled on this DR procedure. Of course, a deletion based upon a lack of educational usefulness (COM:EDUSE) stemming from a lack of a meaningful file description is also a fallback option.

Regards. Grand-Duc (talk) 23:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Подорожник is a name of the plant depicted (see here https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Подорожник_(рослина) and the renaming request is simply asking to remove Russian script letter so the file name is in Ukrainian. Original name of the natural site in Ukrainian is "Нагольний кряж". Russian "ы" is a typo. "Заказник" means "natural reserve". 2A02:A31A:C33F:2E80:4D38:241D:8636:E9D9 15:29, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request solved / retracted. Grand-Duc (talk) 17:45, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 08:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:30, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi. I'm going to talk about an issue that's been revolving around Azerbaijani Wiki for quiet some time. As you may know, there's been an issue of inappropriately using historical pictures that's been found by user Ürfan1917. These pictures were posted on Facebook account of the user in question with his name written on it with red fonts. Another user took these pictures, unprofesionally deleted the name (the red marks are still visible), and posted them on here in their respective pages. Fortunately, it's been resolved, however the user in question wants these pictures to be taken down, and to upload their high resolution versions with his name as source below it. I don't personally know this user, but I'm highly sympathetic with him due to him being the right side in this dispute. Even if these pictures won't be taken down, his name still should be noted as source as "Acquired by Urfan Mammadzadeh". -5.191.68.220 03:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If possible, we should clearly get these images without watermark or other manipulations in the image. These images are PD, and the other user is not copyright holder, so a marking is close to copyfraud. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly we can upload high quality original versions of both photos here, but in this case we request that other plagiarized versions be removed. 5.191.69.40 04:45, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly in both photos, in the upper left corner, the red marks left by the removal of the watermark belonging to Urfan Mammadzade are clearly noticeable, you cannot ignore it. 5.191.69.40 04:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The images can be send, there's no problem, as the person who found them wish the higher resolution versions to be on the site, as well. But the name of the person who put extensive effort in searching these images should be noted below.

P.S. The currents ones should be deleted, and be replaced with new ones, with the the name of the person in question noted. Needless to say that the new ones should be uploaded by him, not the one who originally uploaded them. Dazai0 (talk) 12:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

He can just upload the new ones (under a new name or the old) and amend/update the documentation. No need to delete first. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The images are under protection now. There had been a lot of fuss over it, but instead of solving the issue, they swept it under the rag by locking the edit option. It'd be better if the current ones are deleted, and the new ones are uploaded under the same name. Dazai0 (talk) 15:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly in both photos, in the upper left corner, the red marks left by the removal of the watermark belonging to Urfan Mammadzade are clearly noticeable, you cannot ignore it. 5.191.69.184 05:40, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly we can upload high quality original versions of both photos here, but in this case we request that other plagiarized versions be removed. 5.191.69.184 05:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Normally, that's done the other way round: You can upload the new ones (with a new name), and then we can delete the old ones. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly Ok, we will upload the original photos today, please delete the other versions. 188.253.231.251 06:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly One of the photos has already been uploaded to commons with the correct license and inventory numbers. By comparing the original photo with the plagiarized versions, you can clearly pick out the many manipulation attempts in the upper left corner. Please remove other plagiarized photos.
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Əliheydər_Qarayev_və_Mirzə_Davud_Hüseynov._1921-ci_il.tif 5.191.67.100 07:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly The original version of one of the photos has already been uploaded, please remove the plagiarized version. 5.191.67.100 07:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly The difference in quality between the plagiarized photo and the real version, the manipulation attempts in the upper left corner of the plagiarized version are clearly visible. Please remove this version:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Əli_Heydər_Qarayev_və_Mirzə_Davud_Hüseynov.jpg 5.191.67.100 07:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, now a low-res duplicate. An admin must decide, but I think this will now get deleted (may take a few days, though) --PaterMcFly (talk) 08:10, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly Very nice. I would like to mention that the photo of Aliheydar Garayevli Habib Jabiyev is also a plagiarism. After this photo is deleted, I can upload the real version of it as well. 5.191.67.124 08:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly
Did the admins look into the matter? Will this failed plagiarism photo be removed? please let me know. 5.191.67.52 09:34, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly Where did the issue go? Could you please let me know. We also want to upload the original version of the other image on the site, for this the plagiarized versions should be removed. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 11:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just have some patience. Admins will look over this after a few days, but they're very busy, so non-urgent deletions might take a bit of time. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly Well, we kindly ask you to expedite this process as much as possible. I will then upload the original high quality version of the other photo to the site. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 20:36, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly Hello, have a nice time. Tomorrow - on July 9, the protection period of both photos will expire. I strongly request you to take immediate action to remove this plagiarized version. After that, we can upload the original version of the other photo to commons. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 01:19, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly During the elapsed time, no record has been added to the file in question, even if it is a candidate for deletion. I don't want to bore you too much, but this matter is really incomprehensible to me. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 01:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't help you at the moment. I just see that the image is even protected, because somebody started a massive edit-war in the image description. Hence, the image is protected. Because the image is, in fact, PD, I think nothing's going to happen. Even the low-res image is still sufficient for inclusion in articles. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly What's the point of keeping a low-quality and manipulated version of an image when a high-quality version is uploaded to the site? This is photo plagiarism. I would like to mention that the protection period of both pictures will be removed tomorrow. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 07:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly The photo protection expires tomorrow, can't be deleted after that? if so there would be no point in me uploading the original photos here. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 07:59, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly I don't think what you are doing is right. I took your word for it and uploaded the original version of the photo here so that the versions taken without my permission would be removed. And you are talking differently now. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly Finally, I would like to inform you that if the plagiarized version of this photo is not removed, I will not ensure that the original licensed form of File:Ali Heydar Garayev and Habib Jabiyev.jpg is uploaded to Commons. So it all depends on you: I ask you to take a fair and constructive position. Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFlyhello, where did the issue go? Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 12:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly Hello, have a nice time. What was the final decision? Could you please let me know. Thank you Ürfan Məmmədzadə2000 (talk) 07:10, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 18:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, have a nice time. I got these photos for the first time by researching them from the state archives. I posted about this on my personal page on December 30, 2022. On March 11, 2023, a person named Yusif took these photos from my profile and uploaded them to wikimedia commons as his personal product. Despite the fact that I protested in the Azerbaijani language version of Wikipedia, they illegally blocked me. Please help to remove these paintings from commons. -Ürfan1917 (talk) 21:15, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 21:28, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : album cover with no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : album cover with no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : album cover with no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio : site copy with no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : artist logo woth no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo tagged with author's name of the photographer, obviously not the uploader Culex (talk) 14:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo tagged with author's name of the photographer, obviously not the uploader Culex (talk) 14:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : album cover with no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : album cover with no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : artist logo woth no proof of cc-by-sa Culex (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sent to uploader by his uncle (the artist on the photo), thus uploader is not the author (as said by himself on WP:FR here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sujet:Xkn046zwtptx6jo1&fromnotif=1#flow-post-xl79w7u1ybnonuv4) Culex (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map of Jammu & Kashmir is given wrong and states as they are not the part of India but they are 106.214.17.116 15:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, File in use. DR by single purpose IP. -- Ooligan (talk) 21:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The map is in use by other Wikimedia projects (several Wikipedia articles) and therefore in scope. According to commons:scope, "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope." If you feel this map should not be used, you should tell the Wikipedias and try to convince local communities to use another one or not to use any map at all.--Pere prlpz (talk) 10:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a screenshot from TV, not own work BigDom (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:54, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, plus standee model is non-permanent display A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Perhaps I am misunderstanding the objections.
(1) This model is in the United States, not the UK. As the caption says, it is in Wayne, Pennsylvania.
(2) Are not Standee models all non-permanent displays?

Knockanar (talk) 21:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The cut out is a DW of a photo of Charles, and there is no FOP in the US either. --Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If it is a personal image, it is out of scope. If it is a corporate image, it is probably a copyvio      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (not by me) Jcb (talk) 23:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:My image.jpg

screenshot of non-free software Aa1bb2cc3dd4ee5 (talk) 16:55, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete On the one hand, I am not at all sure that there is anything here that is not de minimis or ineligible for copyright, so I don't think copyright is a problem, but that is moot, because I also don't see any educational value to this image. Out of scope -- delete. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 00:15, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User page file (en.wiki), no other edits by this user. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find the image in the source from description, but nothing there supports a compatible license. Uploader has several files that were just pulled from various websites without compatible license, so COM:PCP applies here. Ravensfire (talk) 14:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sent to uploader by his uncle (the artist on the photo), thus uploader is not the author (as said by himself on WP:FR here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sujet:Xkn046zwtptx6jo1&fromnotif=1#flow-post-xl79w7u1ybnonuv4) Culex (talk) 14:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sent to uploader by his uncle (the artist on the photo), thus uploader is not the author (as said by himself on WP:FR here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sujet:Xkn046zwtptx6jo1&fromnotif=1#flow-post-xl79w7u1ybnonuv4) Culex (talk) 14:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sent to uploader by his uncle (the artist on the photo), thus uploader is not the author (as said by himself on WP:FR here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sujet:Xkn046zwtptx6jo1&fromnotif=1#flow-post-xl79w7u1ybnonuv4) Culex (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sent to uploader by his uncle (the artist on the photo), thus uploader is not the author (as said by himself on WP:FR here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sujet:Xkn046zwtptx6jo1&fromnotif=1#flow-post-xl79w7u1ybnonuv4) Culex (talk) 14:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo sent to uploader by his uncle (the artist on the photo), thus uploader is not the author (as said by himself on WP:FR here : https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sujet:Xkn046zwtptx6jo1&fromnotif=1#flow-post-xl79w7u1ybnonuv4) Culex (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the person in the photo, I request deletion for reasons of portrait rights. Also, that picture is assumed to be out of scope. 최광모 (talk) 18:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image. Syrus257 (talk) 14:17, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Syrus257 Hello, that's not a valid point for deletion. If you could give a appealing reason then I will be inclined to delete. Thanks C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 14:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@C1K98V Hi, It's a really poor quality image. There are many higher resolution images are available on the same person. Besides, it's so bad in quality I don't think it could be used for any purpose. Let's see what others have to say about this.Syrus257 (talk) 15:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep@Syrus257 I agree with @C1K98V there is no valid reason for this image to be removed. Aurelio de Sandoval (Mensajes aquí please) 06:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No other sources indicating the coat of arms changed, possibly a hoax. SVG-image-maker (talk) 12:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 05:43, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded from a YouTube CC-BY video. However, that YouTube channel is a clip channel, and the video from which it was clipped is not free. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 05:42, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Montenegro.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no FoP in Montenegro. Ruthven (msg) 14:20, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The doll more likely recent or made in 2000s, i.e. after the law no longer requiring copyright notice for eligible works made after effective date of 1989 Act. Fictional character debuted in 2000s. Subject to copyright per COM:TOYS. George Ho (talk) 01:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:36, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Montenegro.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


@A1Cafel, I'm not sure why you suggested this photo for deletion. I'm not sure what your reason is, but considering the fact that in Montenegro there is currently a political problem with religions and nations, and that some people dispute the existence of the Montenegrin nation, and therefore of this Montenegrin folk dance, I doubt that your motive can be caused by this situation. Especially because someone proposed the article itself to be deleted, despite the fact that this dance has been performed in Montenegro since ancient times, and has been declared an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Montenegro. Especially because photos of this monument can be found in many Montenegrin media, publicly published on the Internetː
antenam.net,
pcnen.com,
portalanalitika.me,
mnemagazin.me, etc... BuhaM (talk) 12:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph violated the copyright of the sculptor, and cannot be hosted on Commons. Freedom of panorama (FOP) is the exemption of the permission from the copyright holder, but Montenegro doesn't have valid FOP. That's totally without political or religion concerns. One point you can argue is the de minimis, but IMO the sculpture is still prominent enough that fails de minimis, as it is in the center of the photograph. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:38, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


@A1Cafel, I'm not sure why you suggested this photo for deletion. I'm not sure what your reason is, but considering the fact that in Montenegro there is currently a political problem with religions and nations, and that some people dispute the existence of the Montenegrin nation, and therefore of this Montenegrin folk dance, I doubt that your motive can be caused by this situation. Especially because someone proposed the article itself to be deleted, despite the fact that this dance has been performed in Montenegro since ancient times, and has been declared an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Montenegro. Especially because photos of this monument can be found in many Montenegrin media, publicly published on the Internetː
antenam.net,
pcnen.com,
portalanalitika.me,
mnemagazin.me, etc... BuhaM (talk) 12:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph violated the copyright of the sculptor, and cannot be hosted on Commons. Freedom of panorama (FOP) is the exemption of the permission from the copyright holder, but Montenegro doesn't have valid FOP. That's totally without political or religion concerns. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@A1Cafel, Yes, I saw the article. The problem is that Montenegro does not have an association that cooperates with the Wikimedia Foundation, so there is no one to initiate any contract. I have already talked to some people in Montenegro who are interested in establishing such an association, but it will be difficult because it was never approved to create a Wikipedia in the Montenegrin language. Which is not strange, because it is the same as Serbian, Croatian, Bosnian, Serbo-Croatian... But Balkan politics is incredible. Anyway, thanks for the reply. Friendly greeting. BuhaM (talk) 06:15, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Permission to create derivative works of this statue, or any other artwork in Montenegro, doesn't have anything to do with setting up an association. The copyright owner (usually the author/creator, but could be the person/company that commissioned the work, depending on contracts) of the original work would have to release it under a free license that allows others to create derivatives. If they are willing to do this, they should contact the Commons Volunteer Response Service who would be able to help. Cheers, BigDom (talk) 13:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Montenegro A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


@A1Cafel, I'm not sure why you suggested this photo for deletion. I'm not sure what your reason is, but considering the fact that in Montenegro there is currently a political problem with religions and nations, and that some people dispute the existence of the Montenegrin nation, and therefore of this Montenegrin folk dance, I doubt that your motive can be caused by this situation. Especially because someone proposed the article itself to be deleted, despite the fact that this dance has been performed in Montenegro since ancient times, and has been declared an Intangible Cultural Heritage of Montenegro. Especially because photos of this monument can be found in many Montenegrin media, publicly published on the Internetː
antenam.net
pcnen.com
portalanalitika.me
mnemagazin.me
... etc... BuhaM (talk) 12:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photograph violated the copyright of the sculptor, and cannot be hosted on Commons. Freedom of panorama (FOP) is the exemption of the permission from the copyright holder, but Montenegro doesn't have valid FOP. That's totally without political or religion concerns. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Montenegro. Architect Predrag Ristić died in 2019

A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No mention of source and author, questionable copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What source? I took picture with my phone. -- Vux33 (talk) 05:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see now what is problem. I upload this in sr wiki, because I didn't menaged quite well in Commons and than someone imported file from sr wiki to Commons. --Vux33 (talk) 05:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:42, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files by KraftwerkGlatzing

[edit]

Many of the files uploaded by this user are more than likely not made by the uploader and were never licensed under a free license. Some files like File:KWGLogo2020.jpg are clearly not the uploaders own work but they are too simple to be copyrighted anyway. Files like File:KWGKonzessionsdekret.jpg are more than likely not even scanned by the author, but show a document from the 1920s. All the uploaders other files could be legit or look very fishy (like File:Photovoltaikanlage Kraftwerk Hart.jpg and File:Photovoltaikanlage am Kraftwerk Hart.jpg) --Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:KWGHart.jpg

Files:
- File:KraftwerkHart.jpg (image of a photograph)
- File:KWGDeutenham.jpg (Copyright holder = "Fotostudio Attersee")
- File:KWGWankham01.jpg (Copyright holder = "Fotostudio Attersee")
- File:KWGMühlwang.tif (Author = "LUFTBILD-SERVICE GMBH")
- File:KWGWankham02.jpg (Copyright holder = "Fotostudio Attersee")


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:43, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the depicted statue is likely still in copyright of the sculptor. Unfortunately, Bulgaria has no freedom-of-panorama exception. So, a permission by the sculptor is needed or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo 95.87.235.200 09:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright? Is this single contribution of the user own work? See here, in more detail here, and here. Wouter (talk) 09:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:44, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very doubtful that this is an own work. This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 10:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @DCB,
This is my own photo, taken in Magdeburg at 25th of June at the Entrance of the GETEC-Arena during the play Germany U21 against Franc U21. I have some more photos of the official Logo with my smartphone. What do you need from me, that you belive this is my own work. Regads, Thomas Balou20 (talk) 08:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, this only solves part of the problem here: This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. Therefore, it is to be considered a derivative work and we would need permission from the rights holder to use the file. In this case, it is the International Handball Federation. Otherwise, unfortunately, we cannot use it under a free licence, because it is a copyright violation. DCB (talk) 08:20, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But in other articles it's the same: Handball-Weltmeisterschaft der Männer 2023. There is also a simple photo of the logo shown and it was accepted.
And my photo doesen't show the official Logo from the IHF. The english wiki article shows the official logo, it's with a white background: 2023 Men's Junior World Handball Championship. My photo shows only an advertising poster in the GETEC handball arena in Magdeburg. Balou20 (talk) 13:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
correction of the links, sorry:
WM in Poland/Sweden
U21-WM english wiki Balou20 (talk) 13:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{delete|Nude:Not educationally useful|day=25|month=June|year=2023}} Hellchive (talk) 11:48, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:19, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|< G1. Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content >}} Hellchive (talk) 11:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

G1 clearly doesn't apply, as this image isn't nonsense nor invalid. It's also not out of focus, blurry or low res, so to delete this per COM:NUDITY, it would need to be shown that we have better alternatives. --PaterMcFly (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How many would satisfy you? 186.172.104.107 23:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't matter. Per COM:NUDITY, such images can be deleted, but only if there are better alternatives. And my main point here was that the speedy-deletion criteria G1 is clearly not applicable. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned post stamp. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 12:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • can you provide any evidence that this is not my own work and this is not a cutted photo? the wikimedia page of this photo clearly states that this photo was taken by a camera El Sergey (talk) 12:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned coin 3d object. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 12:55, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • can you provide any evidence that this is not my own work and this is not a cutted photo? the wikimedia page of this photo clearly states that this photo was taken by a camera El Sergey (talk) 13:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned banknote. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • can you provide any evidence that this is not my own work? And this is not a photo? the wikimedia page of this photo clearly states that this photo was taken by a camera El Sergey (talk) 12:58, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scanned banknote. Derivative, not Own work. Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 12:56, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • can you provide any evidence that this is not my own work, and this is not a cutted photo? the wikimedia page of this photo clearly states that this photo was taken by a camera El Sergey (talk) 12:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You need to first proove that russian bank notes are PD, otherwise this is a derivative work and therefore you cannot claim own work, just because you took the picture of it. --PaterMcFly (talk) 06:44, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:47, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While Milne’s 1926 book is in the public domain, later changes to Winnie-the-Pooh is not. Milne’s Winnie-the-Pooh did not wear a red shirt. The red shirt was by a completely different author. The later version is the one that Disney acquired the rights to in 1961. Thus this image is potentially a derivative work of Disneys Winnie the Pooh Trade (talk) 13:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How ‘Public’ is the Public Domain? Winnie-the-Pooh Illustrates Copyright Limitations of Public Domain Works
@Explodingcreepsr, Mako001, Dronebogus, Ricky81682, Andy Dingley, Yann, Jmabel, 1989, Kinketu, TilmannR, Di (they-them), King of Hearts, Jameslwoodward, Brianjd, Dronebogus, and Mako001: --Trade (talk) 13:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure why I got pinged here, but I have a feeling that I know. So, FWIW, DALL-E just gives you a generic kaiju thing when you ask for "Godzilla", the only specificity being that it is bipedal, reptillian-ish, and a bit spikey, with teeth, being more a derivative work of the 19th century depictions of Megalosaurus than of the Japanese monster. It would be interesting to see how it reacts to prompts which seriously attempt to produce clear derivative works of copyrighted characters, since Godzilla is an easy one to dodge, as the basic body style of the creature is based on 19th century depictions of extinct theropods.
However, I'd agree that this image here seems to be crossing the line into a clear derivative work, with the colours, head shape, and basically everything mirroring the Disney owned character very closely indeed. Evidently, some of these AI algorithms are less copyright-conscious than others. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 14:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So we can simply upload a bw version to get rid of the “red shirt“? A11w1ss3nd (talk) 14:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How much can you change the image before it is no longer AI-generated as indicated by the description? Trade (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why would "AI generated" affect this? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Otherwise we would need to change the description in the wikis that use it since they call the image AI generated Trade (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But that wouldn't affect the DR here. My question is, would its deletion status (which hinges on it being a DW of Disney's Pooh) be affected (either way) by it being AI or not? There is a claim made (on no solid basis) that "copyright no longer applies to anything that AI has touched" (and thus it could be kept). There are also editors here who hold that all AI uploads should be deleted and their uploaders banned (and so, delet). I don't support either of these, but are you suggesting that AI here does imply one of them? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, rules about derivative works apply equally to AI as to human created works if you ask me Trade (talk) 16:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, clearly, the AI used a copyrighted work to produce this. If it didn't, it would resemble the A.A Milne character, and wouldn't have the combination of shirt colour, head shape, body colour etc. I'd say that this image does raise questions about how copyright sensitive Midjourney is. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 10:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW,
A photograph of Paddington Bear giving Batman a marmalade sandwich
this is what DALL-E gives you when you try to force it to produce a DW. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:00, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No. Even in B&W, it's still an obvious derivative. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are probably better caricatures to use if you wanna go fair use Trade (talk) 18:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Read Commons:Fan art; fan art is not automatically banned. The concept of a yellow bear has been done several times before. Animals wearing only a shirt with no pants has been done so many times there are multiple TVTropes pages about it. [2] [3] So is a yellow bear wearing a red shirt copyrighted? According to the policy on fan art, Where the work of fiction makes use of commonplace pre-existing elements, taking one of those elements and imaginatively recreating it as an original work of fan art does not infringe any copyright, even if the recreation would clearly be understood to relate to the fictional universe created by the original author. It's difficult to believe that in a world where cartoon bears only wear shirts and nothing else, that Disney has a copyright on a sixth of rainbow. One could argue the ears, nose, and eyebrows are copyrighted, but the entire reason why Xi Jinping has been memed like this is because his nose and eyebrows are said to be similar to Winnie the Pooh. Chess (User talk:Chess) Please ping when replying. 00:08, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Except that the intent here was explicitly to create a derivative work, by making a Xi-Winnie hybrid. Also, this doesn't just take one element, it takes multiple ones, it is a yellow bear with a red shirt, with the same head shape, ears, and basically everything. The eyebrows and nose aren't even part of it here. If you can recognise that it is based on the Disney WtP then that's enough for it to be a DW, even if the individual components had already been used elsewhere. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:43, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, Chess’s rationale was convicing. RodRabelo7 (talk) 02:28, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I don't think that the rationale by Chess is convincing and rather agree with Andy Dingley. As also indicated by the file name, this is not a random "yellow bear with a red shirt", but specifically based on Disney's copyrighted appearance of Winnie the Pooh; the whole "Xinnie the Pooh" joke/meme wouldn't work otherwise. I think it as an example of fair use, but fair use isn't accepted on Commons. The image can be locally hosted and used in English Wikipedia and other projects that allow fair use. Gestumblindi (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Adding this as a formality. To see my rationale, refer to my comments above. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 07:02, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Derivative work of Disney's Winnie the Pooh, which is not in the public domain. MarioJump83 (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:48, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio : screen copy of Yacast site Culex (talk) 14:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:49, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dinnaspirina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation? I find it very hard to believe that one person has taken all these photos, dating form ±1976 until ± 2010s; some look like photographs taken by a press photographer. Please, send an email to Commons, reveiling your real name (stays a secret at the VRT team) and stating either that you really took these photos or mention the names of the real photographers. If other people than yourself took the photos, you need written permission from them that they agree on publishing these photos on Commons. See Commons:Volunteer Response Team for more information (also available in Portuguese). And please, mention the real dates in the files, these photos are not taken on 2023-05-16, as the date in files say.

JopkeB (talk) 15:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not valid plus individual information 최광모 (talk) 18:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To be replaced with the metawiki userpage RandomDuck5000 (talk) 19:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already done. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:51, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author died in 1969 — 70pma means these files will be PD in 2040 in Germany (there still might be some subsisting US copyrights).

* File:Stamp of Germany (DDR) 1960 MiNr 786.JPG

* File:Stamp of Germany (DDR) 1960 MiNr 787.JPG see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Oswin Volkamer

Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 18:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Die Urheberrechte für die Briefmarken von 1948 sind in Deutschland alle bereits abgelaufen gemäß {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}. Sie dürften allerdings gemäß URAA noch bis 2043 in den USA geschützt sein.
Die Rechte für die Briefmarke von 1959 würden nach denselben Regeln in Deutschland 2029 und in den USA 2054 auslaufen.
Nur auf den Briefmarken von 1960 steht der Name Ilgenfritz, sodass das Urheberrecht in Deutschland noch bis 2039 läuft, in den USA bis 2055. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:54, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Struck two which are also in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Oswin Volkamer, to be restored in 2087. --Rosenzweig τ 06:32, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in various years starting in 2044, see categories. --Rosenzweig τ 11:50, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

قمت بحذف هذا التصميم من كل مكان نهائيا Saif.Omar.Alfarouk (talk) 11:24, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(talk) 11:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright violation. Source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Warnung vor schwebender Last - 01.jpg RandomDuck5000 (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: superseded by File:Warnung vor schwebender Last - 01.jpg. --Emha (talk) 10:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Warnung vor schwebender Last - 01.jpg RandomDuck5000 (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: superseded duplicate. --Emha (talk) 10:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Warnung vor schwebender Last - 01.jpg RandomDuck5000 (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: superseded by File:Warnung vor schwebender Last - 01.jpg. --Emha (talk) 10:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ashturianu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio from webpage www.xxxxxxx.com. That website... doesn't appear to be the place of this file's first publication, and I can't find evidence of publication online prior to the file's upload to Commons. That being said, Special:Diff/779721384 seems to indicate that the uploader admits that this is not own work. I think this makes for significant doubt as to the file's freedom, but I can't speedy it without a source available, so I'm opening a DR. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination by uploading user: "I uploaded this image without permission from the original author. I request its removal for going against the rules of the community.". --Emha (talk) 10:08, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ashturianu as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyvio from webpage https://telecable.es/ Royalbroil 12:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Neutral not obvious speedy candidate so convert to full deletion request. Now whether it has characteristics of "uniqueness, individuality and distinguishability" per COM:TOO Spain is marginal. Royalbroil 12:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Can't you put the request to delete it? I uploaded this file, which does not belong to me, and without permission from the original author. You just have to remove it. Ashturianu (talk) 14:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Quoting COM:SPEEDY "Administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases." This question is: Is this image able to be copyrighted since it has little to no originality? All it has is concentric circles and basic letters which neither show originality so I struck my Neutral and change to  Keep. Royalbroil 02:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    It is a logo of a telecommunications company, most likely it is copyrighted. Ashturianu (talk) 10:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, it's a PD-textlogo. --Emha (talk) 10:06, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No publication date and publicator, it's polish photo, so this licence template doesn't apply. PD-Poland also Polarlys (talk) 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I concur with Polarlys. Varlaam (talk) 00:50, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD-Poland. --Emha (talk) 10:13, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although published as "Own work", the photographic focus here is an excerpt from a copyrighted song's lyrics. Certainly this does not satisfy COM:DM and needs to be removed from Commons. Ippantekina (talk) 09:09, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo tirée du film. L'image n'est pas libre de droit Olivier Tanguy (talk) 14:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:41, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

besoin d'une formation simplement Aboubacarkhoraa (talk) 16:03, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish💬 16:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 19:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:43, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo.\ 37.228.140.93 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:45, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cs-wolves as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2

COM:TOO? King of ♥ 19:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:40, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cs-wolves as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 19:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: changed to pd-textlogo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Cs-wolves as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F2. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 19:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: changed to pd-textlogo. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:47, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 최광모 (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

false license Sand Kastle 17 (talk) 02:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: most likely not uploader's own work, no information on actual author and publication. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has become obsolete, it doesn't make sense to have a french version when it doesn't exist in other languages. Also, it is not included in any article in french at the moment. This file can be confusing. (Redundant/bad quality) Goldsztern (talk) 03:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Obsolete maps can remain in scope as historical documents. This has multiple uploads while retaining stated date of 2013 - clarification of what date is depicted should be made. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QuickQuokka as Speedy (Db-fairuse). This is a very simple logo. Unfortunately, this is the logo of a Welsh supermarket chain. Is this under COM:TOO UK? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:39, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Red-tailed hawk: Wales is a part of the UK, so I would assume so. --QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 06:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that Wales is part of the U.K.; my question was more of whether the image is under or over the TOO UK, rather than if TOO UK governed this. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:30, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. Would probably be OK as simple text for many countries, but TOO UK is very strict. In uncertainty, precaution principle prevails. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 81.41.175.237 as no source (no source) Krd 04:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:27, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 81.41.175.237 as no source (no source) Krd 04:45, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purportedly a fictitious image; could easily be replaced by a real image if photographs exist, freely licensed or otherwise, given the 2.6-year half-life for the common 147Pm isotope. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 05:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Replace with File:Promethium.png or File:Promethium-147 solution.jpg and delete File:Promethium.jpg anyway. Vitaium (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:28, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es mi autoría, pero solicitaré una licencia de la misma para que pueda ser utilizada en Wikipedia y cualquier otro lugar, o que la suba otro usuario con mucha más experiencia. La fotografía no se encuentra en ningun otro medio, fue creada por un tercero que conozco y fue creada a mi solicitud, Mega809 (talk) 11:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No la hice yo. Tampoco tengo sus derechos. Mega809 (talk) 11:49, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No tengo forma de demostrar que fue realizada para mí. Yo no cree el artículo, sólo lo actualicé, pero lpuedo obtener los derechos. Mega809 (talk) 11:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred image — Draceane talkcontrib. 12:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And? It can still be used as illustrative picture when you don't want to have an image with visible faces... --Chmee2 (talk) 10:04, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Chmee2: Photos with intentional motion blur or intentionally taken out of the focus are OK an illustrative. But this photo is just unitentional (and unaligned) motion blur without any added value. It's even difficult to identify the content of the photo. Otherwise, per Aktron... :-). — Draceane talkcontrib. 13:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Badly blurred photo from set of images of event, many others of which are of good quality; not useful. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 최광모 (talk) 18:29, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Archivo personal sin uso 191.125.10.227 22:16, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:16, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the person in the photo, I request deletion for reasons of portrait rights. Also, that picture is assumed to be out of scope. 최광모 (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate request. Miniwark (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep In no way is a photo of a military policeman in uniform "assumed to be out of scope." In addition, you waived all rights under copyright law. We may have to delete your photos of other people under South Korean law if you truly did not get anyone's permission; I don't know whether a personality rights tag would suffice. But I don't see how you can suddenly assert privacy rights of a selfie you uploaded as a public-domain file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:34, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:06, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate request. Miniwark (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Also, The right to be forgotten refers to the right to self-determination and the right for information subjects to request deletion and prevention of spread of all information related to them online. On April 29, 2016, the Korea Communications Commission announced the 'Guidelines for Requesting Exclusion of Access to Internet Posts' to guarantee the right to be forgotten. This guideline allows one to request access exclusion from website administrators (wikimedia commons) and search service providers for posts that one cannot delete onerself. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload and request deletion of this photo. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 20:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine.

A1Cafel (talk) 04:34, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


so , for instance Монумент визволителям Донбасу от Adda82.jpg monument is a minor object, so I'm oppose Albedo (talk) 06:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The monument is in the middle of the photo, the title (Монумент визволителям Донбасу от Adda82, Monument to the liberators of Donbas by Adda82) also indicated that the monument is the purpose of taking this photo, I think it is prominent enough that fails de minimis. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, its a bit unclear as to what law applies here. Russia sees the Donbas as it's own territory now, and Russia does have FOP for buildings. So maybe wait until we know what law will apply in future to this region? --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is a monument (3D artwork), not a building, even Russian FOP is not allowed. --A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These photos related only to building, not related to sculpture:
--Butko (talk) 06:57, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, buildings are not covered by Ukrainian FOP. IMO the star is a distinctive feature and it is complex enough to be copyrighted. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A simple star shape does not achieve a Threshold of originality. See: COM:TOO -- Ooligan (talk) 18:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural close. Too broad DR. Please renominate images individually, or in small batches. --Yann (talk) 13:23, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

individual information 최광모 (talk) 18:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep not a notable person, even if he is/was a wikemedia, he didi not need is own empty caetgory with personal informations Miniwark (talk) 16:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:24, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 최광모 (talk) 18:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the person in the photo, I request deletion for reasons of portrait rights. Also, that picture is assumed to be out of scope. 최광모 (talk) 18:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No publication date and publicator, it's polish photo, so this licence template doesn't apply. PD-Poland also King of ♥ 19:48, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Polish. --Yann (talk) 13:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matlin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No publication date and publicator, it's polish photo, so this licence template doesn't apply. PD-Poland also King of ♥ 19:50, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Polish. --Yann (talk) 13:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal drawing. --Yann (talk) 13:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 37.228.140.93 19:51, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non notable person, unused, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 13:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 19:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Non notable persons, unused, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To Whom It May Concern, I'm going through the photos I've uploaded in the past and applying for removal step by step for those that meet the criteria for deletion. Due to my own negligence, I was ignorant of these standards at the time I posted the photos. I would like to apply for deletion of photos that excessively infringe on the portrait rights of others, including myself, or that do not fit within the operational scope of Wikimedia Commons. Many of the pictures I upload are used in the Wikiproject and I will not apply for removal of these pictures. Best Regards, Choi Kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 19:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Image made during what look like to be a public sport event. (Also good looking Korean firefighters are the bests.) Miniwark (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per comment. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I request deletion to protect my personal portrait rights and personal information. It is true that I agreed to the CC copyright when I uploaded this photo. However, as the photo is continuously exposed in Google search and used on various commercial sites, my portrait right and personal information are being infringed. It is assumed that it is impossible to prevent Wikimedia's photos from being exposed to search engines at the request of the user. Everyone has the right not to be arbitrarily photographed, portrayed, or publicized about their face, and not to be used for profit. This portrait right is constitutionally guaranteed under Article 10 of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, I would like to withdraw my intention to agree to the copyright at the time of upload. Best Regards, Choi kwangmo. 최광모 (talk) 09:08, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate request. Miniwark (talk) 13:23, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete My understanding that this a picture of you. Therefore you could not have possibly taken the photograph. The copyright belongs to the photographer. You claim also to be the Uploader although the User name are different. Assuming the Uploader and you are same person, then the Uploader cannot make a claim of "Own Work" and cannot licence it under a cc-by-sa licence. It is therefore a copyright infringement and should be deleted. Headlock0225 (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Non notable person, unused, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не якісний Любмир (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. No reason provided. --Yann (talk) 13:31, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A user and I have a disagreement over whether this stencil by Banksy would be above the ToO in the UK. (they believe this is definitely not free, I'm unsure) Graffiti should be addressed on a case by case basis, and a website has stated that this stencil has been reproduced in Paris, Sydney and Havana, possibly other cities. https://www.artofthestate.co.uk/archive/banksy-2/banksy_tourist_this_is_not_a_photo_opportunity/ Banksy as an artist has also recently requested that his work only be used non-commercially. https://pestcontroloffice.com/use.asp So I am opening this deletion request to resolve this matter Abzeronow (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As the user concerned, I would be content to tag it with template:non-free graffiti (and had done exactly that, but Abzeronow reverted). I believe that by doing so we acknowledge Banksy's rights (and he does sue for commercial infringement, so we use it on sufferance - but I think it likely that he is content for us to do so). But what I believe we should absolutely not do is attribute the image to the photographer who copied Banksy's work and who had no authority to declare it CC-by-anything. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no issue with fixing how the file attributes the two authors in question (the photographer and Banksy). The photograph does have other elements than the Banksy work, but as you say, the Banksy work is the main focus. Abzeronow (talk) 16:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as above COM:TOO UK. In case the photo is kept, I updated the license/author info. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep having re-read the description of COM:TOO UK, I am surprised you come to the this conclusion. Despite a low threshold in the UK, if seems to me that this still falls below it.
Headlock0225 (talk) 13:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Only a few words. --Yann (talk) 13:32, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie prawa autorskiego. Autorka projektu architektonicznego, tj. Barbara Bielecka żyje. Wolność panoramy nie ma zastosowania w przypadku wnętrz. Teukros (talk) 16:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie prawa autorskiego. Autorka projektu architektonicznego, tj. Barbara Bielecka żyje. Wolność panoramy nie ma zastosowania w przypadku wnętrz. Teukros (talk) 16:12, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie prawa autorskiego. Autorka projektu architektonicznego, tj. Barbara Bielecka żyje. Wolność panoramy nie ma zastosowania w przypadku wnętrz. Teukros (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie prawa autorskiego. Autorka projektu architektonicznego, tj. Barbara Bielecka żyje. Wolność panoramy nie ma zastosowania w przypadku wnętrz. Teukros (talk) 16:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie prawa autorskiego. Autorka projektu architektonicznego, tj. Barbara Bielecka żyje. Wolność panoramy nie ma zastosowania w przypadku wnętrz. Teukros (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie prawa autorskiego. Autorka projektu architektonicznego, tj. Barbara Bielecka żyje. Wolność panoramy nie ma zastosowania w przypadku wnętrz. Teukros (talk) 16:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Naruszenie prawa autorskiego. Autorka projektu architektonicznego, tj. Barbara Bielecka żyje. Wolność panoramy nie ma zastosowania w przypadku wnętrz. Teukros (talk) 16:15, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

just a part of stamp. Non PD-BY-exempt now ShinePhantom (talk) 07:24, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The stamp itself isn't protected, so how would a derivative work of a public domain work lose it? User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 15:15, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Stamp is not protected just when it is stamp. ShinePhantom (talk) 06:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That makes no sense.  Keep The original work is in the public domain due to a clause in the copyright law, so any derivatives can be in the public domain (or under a free license). In this case, the image is licensed correctly. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 07:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
In Belarus law: Закон 258-З «О почтовой связи» от 15 декабря 2003 года the stamp is official symbol only if it is stamp - country name («БЕЛАРУСЬ», «BELARUS»), denomination and year must be represented. Do you see that on this file? Also the author (copyright holder) of stamp art (made especially for stamp or adopted) keeps all his/her copyrights for other usages of work than stamp usage. So, many derivative works with belorussian stamps are impossible.ShinePhantom (talk) 08:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Judging by the photo, it was most likely a Soviet official photo. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 14:28, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunatelly Soviet official photo are protected. ShinePhantom (talk) 17:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I know but it still find it strange the stamp itself is not protected by copyright, then you take something out and it somehow got a protection. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 21:21, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, really, how? -- Makakaaaa (talk) 19:23, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: FASTILY (TALK) 04:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stated license doesn't cover the extracted specific portions from an official document without a state sign. FlorianH76 (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, a crop of a stamp doesn't suddenly gain copyright protection. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stated license doesn't cover the extracted specific portions from an official document without a state sign. FlorianH76 (talk) 11:47, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per King of Hearts. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:10, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Solicito su eliminación. De todas formas ya no pienso crear este artículo. Mega809 (talk) 11:53, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

De veras es su propio trabajo? 186.172.104.107 23:25, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader has a history of copyvio, and it fits the duck test. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obraz autorstwa Olgi Bajkowskiej. Naruszenie praw autorskich, autorka niewątpliwie żyła w 1994 r., tworząc rzeźby i wystrój sanktuarium. Teukros (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ale dziwna wiadomość po 16 latach od wysłania obrazka. To się nie łapie na wolność panoramy? Czy wnętrze kościoła (tego, innych) też jest NPA? pzdr Upior polnocy (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Painting is not public domain and FOP in Poland doesn't extend indoors. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its photo from archive so it can't be published - no publication date nor publicator, so PD-Poland doesn't apply Gintek (talk) 18:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Gintek Zaproponuj inne rozwiązanie niż żądanie usunięcia. Grzes1966 (talk) 18:36, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Gintek Zobacz wnioski z dyskusji Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Elżbieta Kossecka [4]. --Grzes1966 (talk) 08:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Using the precedent of the DR linked to, this seems like it was published in the 1930s. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 최광모 (talk) 18:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the person in the photo, I request deletion for reasons of portrait rights. Also, that picture is assumed to be out of scope. 최광모 (talk) 18:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:15, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cggrosse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I suspect that not own work. Probably photographed from museum/art exhibition. If really own work, then Commons is not a gallery for displaying personal art works. Out of the project scope.

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Apparently these are works of de:Catrin Große, so they would be in scope. User:Cggrosse might be that artist, but we'd need a COM:VRT permission to be sure and host these files. --Rosenzweig τ 06:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosenzweig: if these are works of Catrin G. Grosse, then probably no need for VRT, because the user name implicitly implies to Catrin G. Grosse? Estopedist1 (talk) 17:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Estopedist1: She's the sculptor apparently, but we also have the photographer to consider, who is perhaps someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 17:30, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Rosenzweig, we need VRT permission to be sure the sculptor is the photographer. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не якісне фото Любмир (talk) 20:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Похоже до 1 фото. Любмир (talk) 20:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Подібне фото вже є. Любмир (talk) 20:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of WInnie the Pooh Trade (talk) 21:00, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:17, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page is useless as {{Autotranslate}} is able to retreive languages itself. Also, having this file requires people to manually add their language. MacOS Weed (talk) 23:32, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to be in use. Yann (talk) 13:33, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann. Can be renominated once depreciated. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:28, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:38, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EgorovaSvetlana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False licence, not the own work of EgorovaSvetlana!

Ras67 (talk) 22:42, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67
Hi, I have updated to PD-exempt license, if that appropriate?
Pin collection is my own family collection, as well as my Alma mater University's non official logos created while we were students, also from my own family archive.
Значок Thälmann Pioneers.jpg aslo from my family archive, but I am not sure which license should I use for it?
Regarding NCEI DEM of Newton terrain.jpg and File:Drift supercontinents and ancient oceans from 600 Ma to present at nowadays Newton Massachusetts location.webm I have also created it myself based on website data with link provided, what kind of license should I use? EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 23:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - except for the last, these all infringe on the copyright for the pins. The last is from a copyirhgted site. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:27, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EgorovaSvetlana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False licence, not the own work of EgorovaSvetlana! The images are from MyHeritage and probably copyrighted, COM:PCP.

Ras67 (talk) 23:00, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ras67 all of aforementioned are mine original grayscale photo of my family archive and I did colorized it with on My Heritage, which I have mentioned in tag? If needed I can upload original grayscale images as well. EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 23:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@EgorovaSvetlana: Please do, if you haven't already! Original grayscale images are very useful to have for being an accurate historical record of a building or sculpture, without the MyHeritage AI introducing speculative guesses about the details. Belbury (talk) 14:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury MyHeritage AI tool does not only colorize but also leverage image quality of original faded grayscale images and become more alive, even with not perfectly matching color rendering
nevertheless personal priorities
Should grayscale originals go as an version of first uploaded colorized images, need to see how to do it then, never done it before or as separate upload with link to colorized ? EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@EgorovaSvetlana: Separate uploads would be best.
Linking the files together afterwards is optional - if you want to do so, just edit the file page and update the line that says
|other versions=
to say
|other versions={{Other versions|Volsk.jpg}}
or whatever the filename is. Belbury (talk) 15:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury thx, do you know how to have link with small thumb pic preview, also what particular picture do you need from discussed aforementioned list ? EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 15:57, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@EgorovaSvetlana: You can add a thumbnail by adding gallery=yes, eg. {{Other versions|Volsk.jpg|gallery=yes}}
I'm afraid I don't understand your second question! Belbury (talk) 16:29, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury great, thnk you! never mind, thought you were interested to see black and white originals you have mentioned building or sculpture from my colorized pictures listed in deletion request from @Ras67 EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 17:13, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I see what you mean. No specific requests, they are all useful! Belbury (talk) 17:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, this watermark is added when the MyHeritage AI software is used to upscale a user's image. Belbury (talk) 14:40, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Belbury Thank you ! EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 15:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The AI colorations by MyHeritage are cleared, but unfortunately this is not the only issue with your files. You wrote, that the photos are from your "family archive". Thats nice, but own work means, that you personally took these photos or you have inherited the copyright from your family members, which made the photos. This must be proven via an email to VTRS.
For instance i doubt that you have made the original photo from the Chebaki Ivanitsky Estate backyard. Sure, you have made the photo from the photographic print with your Samsung Galaxy Avant mobile phone but therefore not arise a new copyright for you. The old copyright from the original photographer is still valid. Or you declare, that you have inherited these copyright from your relative. --Ras67 (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
yes my dad took it and sure can sent the email as well, no problem EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 16:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If this wasn't a ironically comment, please change the author to your father and send this circumstance to VTRS. Else, if you inherited the rights, it's the same procedure. Thank you --Ras67 (talk) 12:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@EgorovaSvetlana: , please closely follow the procedure of VRT to show your father is giving permission for publication. I relocated this DR from may to july to give more time. Ellywa (talk) 21:44, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellywa thx EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 13:30, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@EgorovaSvetlana: It has been a month since the last message. What is your progress on this? holly {chat} 18:59, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Holly Cheng my understanding I have time to july to educate my father how to do it? first need to educate myself in required process, sorry did not started yet EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellywa: It seems that EgorovaSvetlana is under the impression that one has a full year to reply to VTRS. I am not familiar with that rule, if it exists. This is already the oldest open deletion request in the backlog, and I'd be surprised if it can just remain open for another 8 months. Renerpho (talk) 23:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Renerpho: I intended to give another month and relocated the DR from the queue created in May 2023 into July. @EgorovaSvetlana: Just ask for an email of your father now per VRT. No need to "educate". I think the file can be deleted now and can be undeleted if permission is received. Sorry if I was unclear. Ellywa (talk) 06:55, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellywa: Agreed. Delete all files (not just the one that was used as an example). We can always undelete when we have received permission. Renerpho (talk) 07:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]