Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/05/22

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 22nd, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Standing Alone as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Given institute or site is not responsible for the copyright of content King of ♥ 01:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Self-requested, recent upload. --King of ♥ 01:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Standing Alone as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Given institute or site is not responsible for the copyright of content King of ♥ 01:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Self-requested, recent upload. --King of ♥ 01:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{speedydelete|<연습하다가 실수로 생성되었습니다. 빠른 삭제 부탁합니다.>}} 2020012028 정다혜 (talk) 08:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I request to delete the image that is no longer available because the picture is broken. The image cannot be used because the file is broken. Simsunman (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: The old version of the file is empty. Ceahjlazco1882's version is a duplicate of Flag of Palau.svg. TilmannR (talk) 13:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I request to delete the image that is no longer available because the picture is broken. The image cannot be used because the file is broken. Simsunman (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is not valid. There seems to be a problem that the image is broken. There seems to be no explanation in the file. Request deletion. Simsunman (talk) 12:54, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, probably out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Qualität nicht brauchbar 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:EC70:D83E:FD81:EE82 16:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Request by known LTA vandal. --Achim55 (talk) 18:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine schöne Darstellung. Wird gebeten zu löschen. 2A02:1210:96E7:4E00:D52E:5AB4:7EC0:9D7B 17:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Known LTA vandal again. --Achim55 (talk) 18:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Schlechte Qualität 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:819C:7D8E:CDF2:D87D 07:31, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Request by known LTA vandal. --Achim55 (talk) 12:12, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hauptsächlich Strassenbelag zu sehen. 2A02:1210:8CDB:E100:10F2:608D:D398:AF9E 13:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason. IP is currently blocked due to vandalism. Günther Frager (talk) 15:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, taken from WhatsApp. Yann (talk) 18:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplication of File:Order of the Niger Nigeria.jpg. Surely we do not need a smaller size produced in this manner? 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from WhatsApp, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 17:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMG-20190825-WA0007.jpg was taken i Wikimedia Workshop and from camara, it comes through whatsap. It is important for documentation of the wiki workshop. Please do not delet it. Mulkh Singh (talk) 17:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mulkh Singh: Could you please upload the original file, or send a permission following the instructions at COM:VRT. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible to produce original photo because old data deleted from mobile camara. Mulkh Singh (talk) 17:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:12, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of various people copied from WhatsApp, unlikely to be own works. Some are also out of scope.

Yann (talk) 12:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
Yann, About File:IMG-20190207-WA0013.jpg. I saw that the file is used in an article about "Atar Dagan" (עטר דגן) in Hebrew Wikipedia. I also saw that he edit the article. I want to try to get OTRS approval from him. He probably sent the picture to the User:Haya831, and she upload it. User:Geagea Can you support my suggestion? Thanks. Hanay (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Hanay: Yes, either a permission via COM:VRT should be sent, or the original image with EXIF data uploaded over this one. Thanks, Yann (talk) 14:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:52, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from WhatsApp. Upload the original image, or send a permission via COM:VRT.

Yann (talk) 21:30, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Triggmoff1214 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely personal files. Not used anywhere. Out of scope.

Hulged (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:41, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a personal photo. Nut used. Out of project scope. Hulged (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimas Asmoro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly personal files, COM:HOST.

Kissa21782 (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos by non-contributors Just Sayori OK? (have a chat) 13:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 13:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  •  Delete – Copyright violation. Metadata information is missing on data source. Probably cropped screenshot (Czech version of The Chase, she is a chaser) or from somewhere on the net. Several user files have already been deleted. Kacir (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Info edit ⁵⁶ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Mixtures of low-quality railroad pictures and train time tables, all claimed as own work but using inconsistent CC licences. Most images lack exif data. Where exif data is present, it is inconsistent with other exif data. A couple of images are watermarked.

IronGargoyle (talk) 06:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   19:55, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Info edit ⁵⁶ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader is not creator of the original image. They created low-resolution photocopies with their mobile phone. Exif data of File:Goodwill_school_2._MANAMADURAI.jpg and File:Goodwill school 3. MANAMADURAI.jpg places the image creation more than a kilometer away from the image subject, the Goodwill Matriculation Higher Secondary School. All images have some defects in the lower right corner, most likely as result of a watermark/timestamp removal. Images should be deleted per COM:PCP.

Njd-de (talk) 01:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Info edit ⁵⁶ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Given their history of uploading copyvios they cannot be trusted. It is doubtful that the the uploader and creator of the collage is the creator of the three individual images. Without better source information and/or the three images uploaded separately on Commons with credible exif data and a valid license, this collage should be deleted per COM:PCP.

Njd-de (talk) 01:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has the sculptural figure of Christ as the important or integral subject (instead of accessory). As this is indoors, this is not covered by the German freedom of panorama. Regrettably, its author, sculptor Karl Hemmeter, is not yet dead for more than 70 years (died in 1986). German freedom of panorama only applies to exteriors of architectures and works of art permanently found in public places, that is, outdoors and not indoors. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quoting from COM:FOP Germany#Public: "Whether a place is "public" for purposes of § 59(1) does not depend on whether it is public or private property. Instead, the question turns on its actual accessibility, which, according to the prevailing view, needs to be such that one can infer a (sufficient) dedication to the public....Buildings such as museums, public collections, churches, or administrative buildings are not "public" within the meaning of the statute, and thus photographs of works exhibited in their interior do not qualify for § 59(1)." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I had to laugh at "Regrettably, its author, sculptor Karl Hemmeter, is not yet dead for more than 70 years (died in 1986)." If only he had died a bit sooner.... But who am I to break the law? Dosseman (talk) 08:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dosseman: the admins can undelete or restore your photo at the 70th anniversary of his death. 1986 70 1 (plus one to complete the calendar) = January 1, 2057. By that time his heirs have no more patrimonial rights to control peoples images of his sculptural work. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did not know this. So there may be a goldmine in undeletable stock? I do not think I'll live to see the day (73 50 1=124 years of age). Is this a general rule, or specific to German law? At any rate, thanks for updating me. I will be back in Berlin in four weeks, and careful. Dosseman (talk) 19:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Dosseman: for your first question yes. Deleted files are not forever deleted from Commons, rather these are just made hidden to non-admins like us regular users, and more so the people (general public). There is always undeletion, either through COM:UNDEL or via arranged method (which I did by adding "Category:Undelete in 2057," which contains deleted files to be restored on January 1, 2057 by future admins).
Restoration/undeletion can be sooner if you can contact the heirs of the sculptor and ask them to permit your image to be released under the free license you choose. This can be achieved through COM:VRTS method.
For the second question, that is part of the German law. It is outlined at Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany. Regards, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:44, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW photo. Original author is not an uploader. Original date? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 07:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chryssa, the sculptor, died in 2013. Yann (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann Tagged originally by myself for Speedy Deletion, per "F1. Clear copyright violation". So, I am for Delete per nomination. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 16:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, fine, but FoP issues should have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 17:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chryssa, the sculptor, died in 2013. Yann (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, tagged originally by myself for Speedy Deletion, per "F1. Clear copyright violation". So, I am for Delete per nomination. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 16:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chryssa, the sculptor, died in 2013. Yann (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yann, tagged originally by myself for Speedy Deletion, per "F1. Clear copyright violation". So, I am for Delete per nomination. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 16:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not relevant to any category, cannot be used in a non-eligible contribution Etienne Mordicus (talk) 08:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private photo, not in Common's scope 220.246.141.82 08:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, wrong author, wrong source Xocolatl (talk) 08:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not "own work", see date and https://www.dykking.no/nyheter/79-nyheter/1258-d-s-wartheland-i-nordfjordeid Xocolatl (talk) 09:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Barkave Balusamy (talk) 10:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SEO-Marketing durch Lucas Jantz "Key-Account-Manager" bei Semtrix GmbH, Full-Service-Agentur für Suchmaschinenmarketing. Geschickter geht es mMn kaum. Jbergner (talk) 11:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Schon allein der Dateiname ist nichts als Werbung, von daher Löschen. Aber immerhin transparenter als die bekannten Abmahnfallen unserer einschlägigen Fotografen und Kosinsky-Buddys. Arabsalam (talk) 20:11, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, low quality, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, uncategorized, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Xocolatl (talk) 12:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly copyvio, see talk page. Also experimental infobox. Encycloon (talk) 12:38, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no quality Xocolatl (talk) 12:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accd. to de:Erika Binz-Blanke, this is a work by Erika Binz-Blanke, who is still alive. So this is still protected by copyright and should be deleted. The file can be restored 70 years pma. Rosenzweig τ 13:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich bitte um Löschung des Fotos, da die Aufnahme ohne Einverständniss der Familie des Verstorbenen online gestellt wurde. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Sebastian Uthoff Magnusfilm HH (talk) 13:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist auch nicht nötig, siehe Amtsgericht Mettmann. NNW 17:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, wollte ich auch gerade hier reinsetzen.--Bernhard Diener (talk) 17:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Scan of a catalog CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accd. to de:Erika Binz-Blanke, this game is a work by Erika Binz-Blanke, who is still alive. So these are still protected by copyright and should be deleted. The files can be restored 70 years pma.

Rosenzweig τ 14:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The city in the background seems to have been used for a profile picture in 2015 according to TinEye https://38.media.tumblr.com/avatar_f0b58116b325_64.png CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Şahriyar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brenton Johnson (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roytheredpanda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:54, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Logo Victuallers (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:53, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Retrieved from subject's Twitter. NFarras (talk) 15:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:52, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was only used for learning purposes and is not neccessary 197.221.254.24 17:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously recent drawing marked as 15th/16th century, without a proper source. Almost certainly a copyvio. Darwin Ahoy! 17:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:51, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be of any use Wouter (talk) 17:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover or so. Unlikely to be own work. COM:OTRS needed. Strakhov (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Annie342 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No source, out of the project scope, promotional.

Edslov (talk) 18:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photograph. Scope seems to be fringe. Minor depicted. Nonsensical caption and description Strakhov (talk) 19:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:49, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not used, should be SVG if useful. Yann (talk) 19:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is an undefined form at the bottom of the logo that reaches the threshold of originality, and it is not a text logo. Taichi (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope EpicPupper (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:ShakiraOralFixation.jpg. Yann (talk) 19:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, depicting a non-notable person. — Yerpo Eh? 20:01, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:TheMopila has previously uploaded several copyvios of personality's pictures. I can't find the source of this one via Google reverse search, but considering the uploader's copyvio tendencies and the fact there's no exif nor context to the pic (where was it taken? at which occasion?), I think "own work" claim is doubtful. Titlutin (talk) 20:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:44, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete The uploader claims that this photo is their own work. But the w:en:Cyprus Military Police were dessolved in 1935; so, did the user shot this photo in the 1930s? ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 20:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Not own work. Copyright violation. "Photo by Manos Botrini from the book: Akamas. Nature, Myth, Man" [1]. Please, note that the uploaded photo is cropped, for the real photographer's watermark not to be shown. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from http://shop5.onlinestoresoutlet.ru/content?c=barocke schlösser&id=20 Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 21:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete Copyright violation [2]; anyway, hard to believe tha this low res (plus no convincing metadata) aerial shot was by the ulpoader (who has a thick record of copyright infringement at Commons, as well). ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitely not own work as falsely stated [3]. This looks like a 1930s photo, and according to the caption the uploader wrote in the el/WP that the file is connected the actual year is 1937. So, probably it's still under copyright. (Please, note that the uploader has a thick record of copyright infringement at Commons.) ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screengrab from presumably copyrighted non-free concert video, easily replaceable by a free version taken from the audience. 94.174.111.230 21:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

agree Sciencefish (talk) 08:52, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Very likely to be copyrighted which would make it a good candidate for deletion. But... (FWIW) not that easily replaced; from 30 years ago ( ) and Fury has hardly performed if at all, in he intervening period. Eagleash (talk) 09:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I clicked on the link to the Youtube video -- the cited source for this photo -- I didn't find the video but instead got a message that the video's blocked for copyright reasons. - Åüñîçńøł (talk) 14:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is still accessible from the UK, so you may be seeing a local block. 94.174.111.230 19:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Allaboutkenya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:36, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a personal file uploaded by an SPA and Commons isn't a personal web host. So this is out of scope. Adamant1 (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shows copyrighted YouTube web page, therefore, it is a derivative of a non-free work I.hate.spam.mail.here (talk) 23:11, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:35, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because it is an old photo. Javia20 (talk) 11:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

because it is an old photo. Javia20 (talk) 08:40, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 11:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The newest version has a transparent background that shows several thumbnails. I think we can delete just the newest version. Lol1VNIO (talk) 19:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete the newest version uploaded 04:42, 3 June 2018 (UTC) per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 19:50, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Update. Keep the newest version uploaded may 2022. Delete old .--EEIM (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: version from 06:42, 3 June 2018 as copyvio/per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Felipe Fidelis Tobias (talk) 22:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you feel the need to bypass the speedy deletion? You left the speedy tag up, BTW. ― Tartan357 Talk 00:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 13:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An identical higher-resolution version is File:Melbourne and Hobson's Bay Railway Company 0-4-0 locomotive of 1854 with workers (NRM ACY 09615).jpg SCHolar44 (talk) 23:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 13:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

被写体となっている人物から使用許可が取り消された。 山本海行 (talk) 12:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accd. to Commons:CUR Germany, these are not free, and accd. to de:Erika Binz-Blanke, they are a work of Erika Binz-Blanke, who is still alive. So they should be deleted. The files can be restored 70 years pma.

Rosenzweig τ 13:12, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains non-free logo of Chongqing SkyShuttle. Wcam (talk) 14:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on. I will delete the logo immediately.@Wcam Aonami toNagoya (talk) 16:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep as the issue has been resolved but  Delete historical versions. —Wcam (talk) 16:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all file versions except last one (from 18:11, 22 May 2022) as copyvio/complex logo. --Wdwd (talk) 15:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Το ανέβασα κατά λάθος Valina Tsikalá (talk) 15:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Το ανέβασα κατά λάθος Valina Tsikalá (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Το ανέβασα κατά λάθος Valina Tsikalá (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Το ανέβασα κατά λάθος Valina Tsikalá (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content/G7. --Wdwd (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I had changed the file name right after uploading the file, but I can't figure out what speedy delete category would apply. So I'm nominating this for deletion. The reason a redirect isn't needed in this case is because I had just uploaded the file and it wasn't being anywhere. Adamant1 (talk) 00:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-res duplicate of File:(Portrait of James Weldon Johnson) (LOC) - Flickr - The Library of Congress.jpg and not used in any articles --- FMSky (talk) 01:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As can be seen from the above gallery, these are not duplicates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:29, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
it is definitey a low-res upscale of this file though

FMSky (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a blurrier duplicate version File:The Soviet Union 1970 lapkin 70-30 cover with stamp CPA 3864 (All Union Philatelic Exhibition).jpg. There's zero point in having both files. Adamant1 (talk) 03:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This file is not blurred. File File:The Soviet Union 1970 lapkin 70-30 cover with stamp CPA 3864 (All Union Philatelic Exhibition).jpg was created from this file. File File:The Soviet Union 1970 lapkin 70-30 cover with stamp CPA 3864 (All Union Philatelic Exhibition).jpg is not blurred. The PNG file image is blurred in the Wiki. See more details: Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in Russian. Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in English..
"Care should be taken when the format is different: For example, it is common and useful to have both a PNG and JPEG of the same image, since (due to a long-standing issue with the thumbnailer), JPEGs thumbnail is better. However, JPEGs aren't lossless images, so progressive editing of a JPEG will destroy the quality, whereas a PNG does not have this problem. Hence, a PNG for (further?) editing and a JPEG for display can be justified." See more details: Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates. Matsievsky (talk) 07:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes it is. Maybe you applied a smoothing filter to the JPG image when you were converting it or something, but there's clearly a difference in quality between the two images and this one is blurry. Even if it wasn't duplicate files can still be evaluated on a case by case bases and I'm getting sick of having to repeat it. Just parroting the guidelines as if they say that's not case is extremely dishonest and not a valid keep rational. In the future it would be great if you could actually take the time next time to compare both images side by side instead of just copying and pasting the same dishonest boilerplate keep reason in every deletion request I make. Seriously dude, it's not that difficult. Load both files side by side, look at them, and give an actual reason why they should both be kept. Otherwise, if your that unwilling to be good faithed and honest about this just don't participate. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:10, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the source video itself is CC-By licensed, it is composed of still images from other sources. The screen capture would thus be a derivative of the presumably copyrighted photo. Paul_012 (talk) 04:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:12, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a bad faith edit of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2019_Moscow_Victory_Day_Parade_04.jpg used in vandalism of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniforms_of_the_Russian_Armed_Forces. This file and the subsequent edit is the only activity of user Steamyou8 indicating that it was a throwaway account. Fcjh (talk) 05:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Adamant1 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F8, this is a scaled down duplicate of File:The Soviet Union 1978 Illustrated stamped envelope Lapkin 78-521(13082)face(Ilya Katunin).png. There's zero reason to have both files.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There's big reason to have both files. File File:The Soviet Union 1970 lapkin 70-30 cover with stamp CPA 3864 (All Union Philatelic Exhibition).jpg was created from this file. See more details: Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in Russian. Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in English..
"Care should be taken when the format is different: For example, it is common and useful to have both a PNG and JPEG of the same image, since (due to a long-standing issue with the thumbnailer), JPEGs thumbnail is better. However, JPEGs aren't lossless images, so progressive editing of a JPEG will destroy the quality, whereas a PNG does not have this problem. Hence, a PNG for (further?) editing and a JPEG for display can be justified." See more details: Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates. Matsievsky (talk) 08:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:16, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I took this picture but someone on the picture told me that he didn't want to appear on Commons. This is why I ask a deletion pour this picture, out of courtesy. Thank you 37.164.46.132 08:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 37.164.46.132 08:35, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not used. --Yann (talk) 16:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Ramil Sitdikov, RIA Novosti, not Kremlin. "The present rules for using materials from this website do not apply to RIA Novosti photographs that MIA Russia Today is the copyright holder of, or to photographs the TASS News Agency is the copyright holder of, when such photographs are posted on the www.kremlin.ru website with an indication of the agency and author." 220.246.141.82 10:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Ramil Sitdikov, RIA Novosti, not Kremlin. "The present rules for using materials from this website do not apply to RIA Novosti photographs that MIA Russia Today is the copyright holder of, or to photographs the TASS News Agency is the copyright holder of, when such photographs are posted on the www.kremlin.ru website with an indication of the agency and author." 220.246.141.82 10:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by RIA Novosti, not Kremlin. "The present rules for using materials from this website do not apply to RIA Novosti photographs that MIA Russia Today is the copyright holder of, or to photographs the TASS News Agency is the copyright holder of, when such photographs are posted on the www.kremlin.ru website with an indication of the agency and author." 220.246.141.82 10:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by RIA Novosti, not Kremlin. "The present rules for using materials from this website do not apply to RIA Novosti photographs that MIA Russia Today is the copyright holder of, or to photographs the TASS News Agency is the copyright holder of, when such photographs are posted on the www.kremlin.ru website with an indication of the agency and author." 220.246.141.82 10:03, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by RIA Novosti, not Kremlin. "The present rules for using materials from this website do not apply to RIA Novosti photographs that MIA Russia Today is the copyright holder of, or to photographs the TASS News Agency is the copyright holder of, when such photographs are posted on the www.kremlin.ru website with an indication of the agency and author." 220.246.141.82 10:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:A5 Aarebruecke02.jpg: For both, there seems to be a problem with credits. See File:A5 Aarebruecke.jpg by another person (uploaded two years before) Enhancing999 (talk) 11:52, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad SVG version of File:Blason-mairie-st-seurin-de-cursac.png. It was accidentally created with badly used vector elements. Heraldrist (talk) 11:57, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Midlyne pierre 200.113.230.175 13:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:22, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EnergyAnalyst1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts and diagrams. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eugene Zelenko, We've identified these International Energy Agency resources as material that we think would add value to energy security and clean energy topics on Wikipedia. For those graphics that haven't yet been used on a specific article, we intend to use them soon. These uploads are part of a special effort by the IEA to provide selected content under a CC BY 4.0 license. We have noticed a lack of up-to-date data and graphics in a lot of related pages, and part of our goal is to make these resources available to any editors who are contributing in the energy/transition space. --EnergyAnalyst1 (talk) 09:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is very well in scope. Sure, they would be better as SVG, but who would create these? Yann (talk) 11:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Indeed in scope. Agree with Yann that there could be more optimal versions (like svg) but it is still very useful. //Tanzania (talk) 14:42, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep a clear educational benefit and use case for these images, some images are already being used. John Cummings (talk) 14:47, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep clearly in scope, like any other materials produced by high-reputation institutions, of high educational use, Sadads (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Very useful images, clearly within the definition of scope and much potential for benefit EriedgenArc (talk) 15:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep in scope and only recently uploaded, need to give editors more time to incorporate them into articles. Zeromonk (talk) 16:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Very useful. Could have a better quality, but no reason to delete those. Nadzik (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Jumping in to say I'm also working on getting higher quality versions of these up. Thanks all. EnergyAnalyst1 (talk) 08:40, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Within scope. Lirazelf (talk) 15:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:08, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 01:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:23, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:04, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:03, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:02, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 02:00, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 01:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 01:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:42, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the permission explanation. The fair use of this image is covered under Paragraph (b). Kj1595 (talk) 01:59, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria is 70 years after the death of the artist and in this case the artist died in 1967. Which isn't 70 years ago. So this image is likely not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & Commons:Stamps#Austria: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria is 70 years after the death of the artist and in this case the artist died in 1957, which isn't 70 years ago. So this image is likely not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & Commons:Stamps#Austria: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria is 70 years after the death of the artist and in this case the artist died in 1957, which isn't 70 years ago. So this image is likely not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & Commons:Stamps#Austria: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria is 70 years after the death of the artist and in this case the artist died in 1957, which isn't 70 years ago. So this image is likely not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & Commons:Stamps#Austria: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria is 70 years after the death of the artist and in this case the artist died in 1957, which isn't 70 years ago. So this image is likely not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & Commons:Stamps#Austria: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria is 70 years after the death of the artist and in this case the artist died in 1957, which isn't 70 years ago. So this image is likely not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & Commons:Stamps#Austria: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria is 70 years after the death of the artist and in this case the artist died in 1957, which isn't 70 years ago. So this image is likely not PD. Adamant1 (talk) 04:41, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & Commons:Stamps#Austria: Missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

新しい写真に再撮影したため。 山本海行 (talk) 19:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "took a new picture" is no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

新しい写真に再撮影したため。 山本海行 (talk) 19:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "took a new picture" is no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

新しい写真に再撮影したため 山本海行 (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "took a new picture" is no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

新しい写真に再撮影したため 山本海行 (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: "took a new picture" is no valid reason for deletion. --Yasu (talk) 15:42, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is results of DNA for the tribe< and it is not true and not showing the whole tribe parts, also it needs correction because it is not an absolute fact Matharish44 (talk) 02:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC) This is a completely fake genealogy presentation and misleading information about Zahran's DNA test results. Its source is an unknown Twitter account. Moreover, the majority of the tribe branches are not included in this file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed A Alzahrani (talk • contribs) 09:34, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, all this can be true, but the file is still used in ar.wiki and the file is in our project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file provides incorrect genetic information of Zahran Tripe, It does not contain information about the test numbers, which DNA laboratory performed the genetic testing, or what study or entity conducted these tests! There is simply no approved source or reference for this file. The only approved source for genetic tests for this tribe is the Twitter account @Zahran_ZS5833, and this official account has never approved this file. Talza92 (talk) 18:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Nothing has changed since the previous nomination; the file is still in use and still in scope. Omphalographer (talk) 00:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your response. So you are okay with providing wrong DNA results information of any society and it’s okay to be published here? Talza92 (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:32, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ceci est une ancienne version, la nouvelle numérisation est de meilleur qualité; Voir File:Rion, le château Poisson 1928.jpg Romacq.40370 (talk) 13:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai réalisé un nouveau scan de cette carte postale, voir File:Rion, le château Poisson 1928.jpg , je souhaite le supprimer afin de ne pas surcharger Wikipedia avec des doublons. Romacq.40370 (talk) 18:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, new scan is File:Rion, le château Poisson 1928.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 18:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ceci est une ancienne version, la nouvelle numérisation est de meilleur qualité; Voir les fichiers affiliés à Rion des Landes Romacq.40370 (talk) 13:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai réalisé un nouveau scan de meilleur qualité de cette CPA, voir File:Rion, le lac 1907.jpg . Je souhaite supprimer ce fichier afin de ne pas surcharger Wikipédia avec des doublons. Romacq.40370 (talk) 18:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, new scan is File:Rion, le lac 1907.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 18:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miguel Andrade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives, COM:PACKAGING.

Xunks (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the deletion of these files. The guidelines about uploading package photos in Wikimedia are clear; I do not agree with these guidelines, but that is not the point here and I am assuming they have been established by people who have thought carefully about the reasons for having them. Sorry for the inconvenience. Miguel Andrade (talk) 08:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright for stamps in Austria/Liechtenstein is 70 years after the death of the artist and engraver. In this case both of them died in the 2000s. Which isn't 70 years ago. So this image, as well as the other ones that I'm nominating along with it, aren't in the public domain.

Adamant1 (talk) 06:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Actually, we have five different artists here, none of whom died over 70 years ago. I'll annotate the files so it is clear which can be restored when. --Rosenzweig τ 13:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The artists are:

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iffybogus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 14:08, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anambra Grand Commander Medal.jpg has been replaced by a new upload just now, and this new upload is being discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anambra Grand Commander Medal.jpg. It would have been preferable in my view had the uploader used am entirely new filename. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:36, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The picture of the medal was deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anambra Grand Commander Medal.jpg. From what I gathered, the uploader herself is one of the persons shown in File:Oyibo Ekwulo Odinamadu and her daughters.png, which apparently was taken at some kind of formal reception, so it's unlikely that it was taken with a self-timer or such, meaning the uploader is not the photographer. The other files appear to be scans taken from a family album, taken by unnamed photographers. Accd. to the biography of the woman they show, they may have been taken in Nigeria or the US or even elsewhere. Some of the older ones might be in the PD in Nigeria if they were published there over 50 years ago, but then they would most likely be still protected in the US per the URAA. As for those perhaps taken in the US, US copyright status would depend upon time and circumstances of publication (if there was a publication). They were apparently not taken by the uploader, who was probably too young to be the photographer when most of these were taken. If she is indeed the photographer, or if the photographer(s) otherwise consent to the images' uploads here under a free license, we should have COM:VRT e-mail permissions to confirm this. As we don't have any such permissions, I'll delete the files. They can still be restored if permissions are sent and accepted. --Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iffybogus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This cannot be a picture taken by the uploader. It is a scan or other reproduction of a picture whose copyright is held elsewhere. COM:PCOP applies. COM:VRT may be used to assert a legitimate right to upload this picture

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a derivat9ve work of File:Anambra Grand Commander Medal.jpg which is being discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Iffybogus 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per rationale at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Anambra Grand Commander Medal.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 13:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. The picture also contains a massive watermark. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:31, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I should have noticed that the editor had uploaded a new version of gthe file discussed for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Iffybogus. However, the new version differs markedly from the old version, so a new deletion discussion is probably warranted. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:34, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Even if the photos themselves were ok (which I haven't looked into closely), they're definitively derivative works of the medal, which is sufficiently creative to be copyrighted. I couldn't find an exception for works of this kind in COM:Nigeria, and the state only exists since 1960, so the medal design can't be PD-old (Nigeria has 70 years pma, or 70 years after publication for government works). --Rosenzweig τ 13:39, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work 78 years ago.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:15, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Most of that title page would be {{PD-text}}, but the two small illustrations would certainly by protected in the UK given the low threshold of originality there. As this magazine was founded in 1926 and the society behind it in 1918, they could not be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}} even if used right from the start. So therefore the file can be restored with PD-old-assumed in 2066, unless someone has evidence of earlier publication of these illustrations. --Rosenzweig τ 14:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Paul Sills, NOT Fred J. Baur. See https://www.paulsills.com/about Cbeak (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per the precautionary principle. Whoever it is, there is not enough information/evidence to confirm the {{PD-US-no notice}} tag it was uploaded with. --Rosenzweig τ 18:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Films copyrights renewed in 1962. (1) Currently copyrighted by Paramount--Bacromisee (talk) 20:32, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Copyright renewed on June 7, 1962, see [4]. The file can be restored in 2030. --Rosenzweig τ 18:16, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DELETE: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minnie the Moocher (1932).webm--Bacromisee (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Bad source link. Actual source was copyrighted & renewed (no matter who or what owns the copyright now.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 22:28, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The copyright was renewed on November 10, 1959, see [5]. The file can be restored in 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

if the date is right, the uploader can't be the author... Xocolatl (talk) 12:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. Appears to be taken from somewhere without naming the source; not necessarily PD-old, could also be more recent. --Rosenzweig τ 09:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's zero point in having a file that's so low quality no one call what it's an image of. In this case the image is so low quality that's it's essentially unreadable. Adamant1 (talk) 02:04, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is visible quite normally. Upload the file better. --Matsievsky (talk) 02:18, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No it's not. You can upload a better file if you think it stay on Commons since your the one that uploaded this one. Otherwise that's on you for uploading an extremely unviewable image when you had better options. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:53, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by FMSky as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: Marie Sklodowska Curie (1867-1934) (cropped).jpg
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Aimarekin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Seems to be a screenshot of a copyrighted map. Watermark down right is of a screenshoot tool. Certainly old enough. Yann (talk) 07:51, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader did not state where this map comes from. This map could really have been made from 1779-1783, in which case it wouldn't be copyrighted. It could however be a recreation, or a map made recently showing data from 1779-1783. Since it's origin isn't clear this is unknown. From my point of view, for this image to be allowed on Commons it's source must be found, especially since there seems to be no artifacts that you'd expect on such an old map. -- Aimarekin (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Probably not from the 18th century, but at least 100 years old. This style of maps is not done since a very long time. Yann (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May not be the style of maps done nowadays, but it could be a recreation of a past map. The title (which I translated using Google) suggests otherwise, but it could be a fantasy one. I'm no map expert - but if you say the map could be 100 years old, that means it could also still be copyrighted depending on the author's death. I don't think we can be sure of this work's copyright status unless we find it's original source. -- Aimarekin (talk) 23:06, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is a part of the First Military Mapping Survey of the Austrian Empire, or de:Josephinische Landesaufnahme, the part for Galizien und Lodomerien. --Rosenzweig τ 13:10, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RenanIL96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RenanIL96: I don't understand, they all have the author/date/country. In fact only the country that maybe is not explicit:

RenanIL96: Well, if you want to delete these files, you can delete them, they are not being used in any article and I will not use them anymore.

But please, not this one, it has the requirements you are asking for and is being used in several articles here on wikipedia


Deleted: four that did not look like own work (more like taken from a web site or similar), per nomination, kept one from 1884 per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamike (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The Thai government maintains copyright over the works create under its control. All of the uploader's uploads have been copyvios.

Paul_012 (talk) 04:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:51, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rameshe999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While the source videos for these images were streamed on YouTube by Thairath with a CC By licence, these streams are re-broadcasts from the parliament's broadcasting service, as can be identified by the TPTV logo. Thairath Online doesn't appear to be the copyright holder, and thus the CC licence is likely invalid.

Paul_012 (talk) 04:33, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:48, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files containing Scratch trademarks

[edit]

According to Scratch's FAQ and TOS, Scratch's own trademarks (which include some of their characters) aren't under a free license. For screenshots, I guess they could have the copyrighted parts censored? File:Tor Hidden Service of Duck Duck Go 24072019.png as example. Also see:

Scratch Cat

[edit]

Giga

[edit]

Gobo

[edit]

Nano

[edit]

Pico

[edit]

i wasn't sure if these counted so i'm not including them for deletion:

--SergioFLS (talk) 04:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ti sbagli se leggi le FAQ di scratch [6] gli screenshot sono rilasciati sotto licenza CC-BY-SA. Ho riportato il link in italiano ma trovi la documentazione anche in inglese. Il rteam di Scratch chiede solo di riportare una attribuzione. Quindi per favore, se hai cancellato, rispristinami le immagini. Sono un insegnante e sto creando molte guide su wikiversità per i miei studenti. Grazie. --Mattruffoni (talk) 07:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, deleted most, contain copyrighted images/logos. Two could be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 22:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Авторство под сомнением, явно студийный снимок из семейного архива -- Tomasina (talk) 08:25, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:08, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, wrong author, wrong source... Xocolatl (talk) 08:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover (Manolo Guerra en el parador). Unlikely own work. COM:VRT needed. Strakhov (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

According to the Wikipedia draft article this image is being used in, the artist is "Manolo Guerra Bermejo", a Spanish singer born in Barcarrota an dead in Miami (1932-1986). According to this source the album was released in 1967, according to the draft article probably outside Spain, since he apparently migrated to the Americas in 1956-1957. Strakhov (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyrighted album cover. --Ellywa (talk) 22:09, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be true image of YouTube uploader Chariez Dela Torre. The YT video itself has this in its description "Credits to the rightful owner for the SLIDE PICTURE,music and clip used in this channel that were found on public post. If you want to remove this clip please contact via email." This indicates the YT uploader just gathered materials including the video clip of Aga Muhlach elsewhere. The said notice also indicates non-perpetuity of the materials in the video, and allows the original owners/holders of the materials to contact her via email if they become dissatisfied with the materials' inclusion in the video. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:14, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Indonesia. According to idhotel in WordPress, the hotel presumably was builded in 2003, and was renovated in 2010. Heraldrist (talk) 12:09, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:49, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails (e) news and press information which have a simple nature of information 220.246.141.82 16:17, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So, your only argument for tens of images that you nominated for deletions is "Fails". Read the law (and similar laws in EU) before doing that, at least. Bes-ARTTalk 18:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Here you have the law "ON THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION" where in "Article 2 - Definitions" states: 2)"Informacion publik" është çdo e dhënë e regjistruar në çfarëdo lloj forme dhe formati, gjatë ushtrimit të funksionit publik, pavarësisht nëse është përpiluar ose jo nga autoriteti publik.. Translated: 2)"Public information" is any data recorded in any form and format, during the exercise of public office, regardless of whether it is compiled or not by public authority.. Thanks Bes-ARTTalk 19:30, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wcam as Logo Yann (talk) 07:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Question Is this kind of emblem copyrighted, with the government of Kedah asking for royalties every time it's used, or is it public and free for anyone to use as long as they don't impersonate the Sultan? 00 Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to lack of information like source, author, publication status and creation date of the original design – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos, drawings, publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep clearly historical materials, that are in scope of the wiki, don't understand the nomination, Sadads (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
License statements must be fixed for that. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:55, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Could you explain what you're trying to do right now? The point is that I am not experienced in the province of uploading files and etc., therefore I cannot repair the so-called license. I am not a lawyer, and, accordingly, I suppose legal aspects to be very unintelligible and obscure. If you want to help with doing away with this problem, with putting an end to this highly appalling, I will be unaffectedly rejoiced, even though my illiteracy in the province of conduct, address and abearance almost passes comprehension, in conformity with my humble opinion.Роман Сергеевич Сидоров (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please read Commons:Copyright rules by territory for relevant country(es) to understand when works become public domain there. To begin you need to find information about author (if known) and his/her dates of life (or at least date of publication) for each file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep A mix of images from the 1800s up to early 1900s. Why was a 1909 UK newspaper page nominated and an engraving from the 1800s? --RAN (talk) 04:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Because of bogus license claims. Problems must be fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, it is blatantly obvious that a set of the so-called problems have been fixed, therefore there is a certain advantage in saving the aforesaid set of problems.Роман Сергеевич Сидоров (talk) 18:06, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's responsibility of uploader to provide proper source and license information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:12, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the files are in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the files have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FoP doesn't apply to text in China. 15:07, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep中国著作权法所保护的是作品中作者具有独创性的表达,本图中所拍摄的对象为设立于公共场所的标识标牌,其中的文字是对此地名(城门)的得名、形制和相关历史事件平铺直叙的交代,缺乏独创性的构思、分析或评论,达不到著作权法所保护的独创性门槛。--猫猫的日记本 (talk) 13:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Original design of the way the text is presented and that is copyrighted imho. --Ellywa (talk) 20:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a scaled down duplicate of File:USSR PCWCS №01 10th anniversary of the world's first human space flight sp.cancellation Moscow.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matsievsky (talk • contribs) 04:14, 22. May 2022 (UTC)

 Keep sp.cancellation Zvyozdny gorodok and sp.cancellation Moscow are different words. Therefore, these are completely different files that have different postmarks on the envelopes. --Matsievsky (talk) 02:13, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image is so blurry there's almost zero way to tell that they are different if they even are. That's on you for uploading it in the first place. There's zero point keeping this when there's essentially no way to tell it from other or read what it says. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:55, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, you did the deletion request wrong when you converted it from a speedy delete nomination and I'd appreciate it if you fixed the issue. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not duplicates. --Rosenzweig τ 09:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]