Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/05/13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 13th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture of this pop singer from Belarus is uploaded by the new contributor whose username is identical with the name of her production firm. It is unclear if the person who did so is legally authorized to use the photograph's work this way. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low Resolution photo. No cameradata. A resized picture from original. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose There is no copyright violation as I'm the copyright owner of the photograph and I'm the one who uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons. The photo was cropped just to include Kaviyoor Sivaprasad and to avoid other identifiable individuals sitting next to him.--Joseph 💬 05:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
We cannot verify the original photographer of this image without camera data in Exif data. Other wise the uploader may not be the original copyright owner. If you are the photographer then you can upload a picture with enough exif data. You can crop a picture by maintaining the original exif data from camera. Otherwise it is a copyright violation.--Ranjithsiji (talk) 19:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - Not a valid reason for deletion. The picture is obviously cropped to give prominence to the subject of the photo. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am taking down the deletion request. Because according to COM:AGF this person may be the copyright holder for this photograph. Sorry for the misunderstanding. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nominator withdrew nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image. No cameradata. Resized picture from original. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking down the deletion request. Because according to COM:AGF this person may be the copyright holder for this photograph. Sorry for the misunderstanding. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nominator withdrew DR. --Sreejith K (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense by vandal Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: U3. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

自分のプライバシーを傷つけると気がつきました 由紀奈 (talk) 01:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Google translated the reason as "I realized that it would hurt my privacy". Actually no privacy is violated, because place is unidentified and no people are depicted. Courtesy deletion due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue image is uploaded on Instagram it is not the users work Roshnikaur123 (talk) 05:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by DMacks as copyvio from Instagram. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near dupe of File:03481jfGapan City Rustica Landmarks Roads Nueva Ecijafvf 06.jpg Minoraxtalk 05:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I agree, file 06 seems slightly better than file 07. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image. No cameradata. Resized picture from original. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking down the deletion request. Because according to COM:AGF this person may be the copyright holder for this photograph. Sorry for the misunderstanding. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description of source as "Own work" contradicts description of identical file on English Wikipedia (by the same uploader) that the file "Was sent to me personally" and "This image is non copyrighted but can be used only for wikipedia purpose". IronGargoyle (talk) 02:32, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely re-upload of previously deleted file. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Not re-uploads, but still copyvio. I'll delete all uploads of MrMawuli (talk · contribs) as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 12:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Operator873

[edit]

Operator873 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Unused personal logos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can speed this process along. I agree they can/should be removed so I'll tag them for author request. Operator873 (talk) 21:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Technically incorrect presentation of the statistical facts. The delimitation of the individual statistical areas in the colored presentation is completely arbitrary and, above all, incoherent. There are sometimes considerable gaps between the individual values. In addition, no sources are given as the basis for the data. All in all, this map is not encyclopedically usable and should be deleted. 2003:D6:C701:2592:E980:4695:23ED:C59D 06:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation: clear copyright message in bottom left corner. Taivo (talk) 14:35, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Technically incorrect presentation of the statistical facts. The delimitation of the individual statistical areas in the colored presentation is completely arbitrary and, above all, incoherent. There are sometimes considerable gaps between the individual values. In addition, no sources are given as the basis for the data. All in all, this map is not encyclopedically usable and should be deleted. 2003:D6:C701:2592:E980:4695:23ED:C59D 06:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation: clear copyright message in bottom left corner. Taivo (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, I uploaded this by mistake. Skytyler99 (talk) 17:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted book cover. Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Professional photo. No EXIF. Smooth O (talk) 07:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, author is Pankaj Jagtapi, not uploader. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no exif, single contribution, likely taken from a widely available photograph copyrighted by the Freud Museum [2], a version of which is sold as a postcard in the Freud Museum shop. — Racconish💬 07:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1 : it doesn't look like a photograph taken by a visitor, --Pierrette13 (talk) 11:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rename the uploaded file name ROvoch (talk) 10:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The PBS logo is non-free Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 13:29, 14 Mai 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Not "own work"; the PBS logo is non-free --Krdbot 20:55, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a blatant copyright violation SSSB (talk) 08:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright message in metadata and bottom right corner. Taivo (talk) 14:17, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture for an article on the French version of Wikipedia but the Raùl75013 (talk) 09:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

and the article was deleted. As this picture comes from personal archives, in this class, I would like to see this picture deleted. Thank you Raùl75013 (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:19, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Single upload, no EXIF, file not in use. Smooth O (talk) 09:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ошибочная загрузка файла 93.73.201.134 15:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ошибочная загрузка файла 93.73.201.134 15:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ошибочная загрузка файла Ptica0791 (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of another photo - see https://www.bursadabugun.com/haber/milletvekili-burhan-cakir-in-covid-19-testi-pozitif-cikti-1350156.html - think we need OTRS as the claim of own work is unlikely Gbawden (talk) 12:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inferior version of File:The Stream in Forest.jpg Anvilaquarius (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double upload of File:Шильдер Андрей Николаевич 2.jpg Anvilaquarius (talk) 13:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dipemo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused files of non-notable person/corporate. Out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   13:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KAMK1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KAMK1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res, no EXIF, uploaded among blatant copyvios of this subject stole from social media, all other user uploads copyvios. PRP issue.

Эlcobbola talk 18:53, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred copy of File:The Arms Production in Britain in the First World War Q27868.jpg giving the wrong author, wrong creation date and wrong licence. The blurred image has been copied from Flickr but the source file and Flikr account appear to have been deleted. From Hill To Shore (talk) 15:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Per nom, low quality and cropped. --Achim (talk) 20:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple forms, not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a personal photo with no useful usage barring disruption on e.g. Karen Bardsley on the English Wikipedia. Iggy the Swan (talk) 15:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important comment: By searching the name "Karen Field", I have managed to find the photo of the person on Facebook who indeed has the same name (and checking the friend list, I have also spotted the photo 'File:HarryKirby2020' that Ron Carlsen12 uploaded as well. Therefore it is unlikely to be own work in addition to disruption. Iggy the Swan (talk) 21:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, source – Facebook. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't qualify as a simple enough logo to be ineligible for copyright. "Simple geometric shapes" means things like an oval around some text, or little decorations / accents / cool fonts on the text, or things like the Olympic Rings. While on the simple side, this is clearly closer to artwork than it is to just some geometric shapes. SnowFire (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, per nomination. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and extremely simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, complex logo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, complex logo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:11, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo Chianti (talk) 16:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 16:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, complex logo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ScienceMan123 as Fair use (non-free) and the most recent rationale was: logo Chianti (talk) 16:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 16:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, changed to PD-textlogo, which I think is appropriate? ScienceMan123 (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, complex logo, OTRS-permission from company representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo Chianti (talk) 16:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 16:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, does not surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain tex and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 17:44, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, scaled-down file:애터미 logo.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 17:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, scaled-down file:애터미 logo.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 17:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 17:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication of File:Flag of Chile.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 20×13 pixels. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agora as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by GAndy as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright. Should be tagged with PD-textlogo.--Chianti (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per ru:Союз марксистов the organization is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No permission required because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, therefore not eligible for copyright. Should be tagged PD-textlogo instead.--Chianti (talk) 18:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as a logo used only on an en WP draft that is going nowhere. The creating editor is indeffed on en WP "(Using Wikipedia for spam or advertising purposes)" and the draft is up for speedy deletion as an advert. No educational value, Out of Scope. Timtrent (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das Logo ist ein reines Textlogo und hat keine Schöpfungshöhe. Ganz klar  Keep. Und Out of Scope ist locker auszulegen, nicht überstreng. Es kann jederzeit sein, dass ein Artikel zu diesem Unternehmen angelegt wird. -- Chaddy (talk) 21:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is textlogo and ineligible for copyright. Deleted as out of project scope: per en:Draft:Hoddle the organization is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creato per sbaglio, copia di un file creato con il template demografia su wikipedia LorenzoCau05 (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused file, uploader's request. Courtesy deletion. This is the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The test was a failure Lewis737a3nthony (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused test file, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted to Tom Honan in the metadata. No relation to the flickr source given at the file page. DrKay (talk) 19:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source link points to different file with NC-ND license. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly cropped from somewhere. Other files at flickr sources doesn't seem to be own work as well Minoraxtalk 02:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 02:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#G10.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amit sarauniya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE.

jdx Re: 02:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom, COM:CSD#G10.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 02:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

insufficiently unidentified person; no clarity to how it is withing scope  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 03:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nileearls (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Gallery of personal photos of non contributor.

Smooth O (talk) 07:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:23, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mc.Bastet

[edit]

Mc.Bastet (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Depicted musician is non-notable, she is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Notability is not a criterion applicable to Commons. --MB-one (talk) 10:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is, please read COM:PARTYPICS. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Matej2017

[edit]

Matej2017 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Text is too small to be readable. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Rename}}. ROvoch (talk) 09:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - That is not a reason to delete -- I renamed it; next time, please ensure that the description is correct, and then use RenameLink or {{Rename}}, and an Admin or File Mover will move the file to the correct name.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of TiaWalkerNYLA

[edit]

Here are all contributions of TiaWalkerNYLA (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The photo contributions of Tia Walker as user TiaWalkerNYLA her own work and not any type of copyright violation. The same photos appear on the Instagram account of THETIAWALKER. Ikon72

All previously published images must have OTRS-permission or other kind of evidence of free license. Also OTRS-permission must be used for showing, that TiaWalkerNYLA is Tia Walker – due to big number of fans and impostors this is not obvious. Taivo (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Joerg Zenner

[edit]

Joerg Zenner (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Different size, metadata is missing. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Olubakers

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of OluBakers (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo devalued by the effect, out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 10:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chef Jaswinder Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Solely self promotional images and so outside our scope

Herby talk thyme 11:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kennytech155 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Hoo man (talk) 13:12, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete used for advertisement only, F10'able. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 01:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:35, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This a photograph by Life Magazine photographer John Phillips, who died in 1996. It is implausible that the "own work" claim by the uploader is valid. Zero0000 (talk) 14:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 05:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:12, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vand collage without educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sachin Kapur Army (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Hoo man (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   14:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people with no evidence of notability. Commons has a specific scope and is not a private photo album. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of an insignificant person, used for self-promotion GAndy (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo of an insignificant person, used for self-promotion. GAndy (talk) 18:38, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Askeuhd (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jonjamespr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SPA for self-promotion, out of project scope. Article es:Jonjamespr has been deleted, no other contributions to wm projects.

Achim (talk) 19:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cdomm17

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Cdomm17 (talk · contribs):

Small photos, mostly without metadata. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:58, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of VALE TV

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of VALE TV (talk · contribs):

Small photos, mostly without metadata. I suspect not own work, but different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 09:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used in spam draft. P 1 9 9   13:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 01:35, 20 Mai 2021 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:BeatrizFranck-Brand1.jpg --Krdbot 08:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deliberate Flickrwashing scam - every image unloaded to Commons the same day as upload to Flickr, and images all appeared elsewhere prior to upload to Flickr (e.g. File:Vietnam UN Blue-beret soldiers.jpg - Flickr 5 April 2021, but here 31. March 2021; File:Vietnam People's Air Force Su-27SK reg. 6002.jpg - Flickr 16 February 2021 , but here 24. October 2019; File:Vietnam Coast Guard TT-120 Class (Tuần tra 120t).jpg - Flickr January 30, 2021, but here 19. May 2014, etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 20:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete License laundering mean misrepresent author information. StayC, Bae173 and music fans [ talk to me ] 01:19, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 10:01, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Galeriadeartebr8

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Galeriadeartebr8 (talk · contribs):

pt:Lucas Lopes Artista was deleted due to non-notability. His art is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sirclaude

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Sirclaude~commonswiki (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos. If camera data exist, then usually different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Salazardaviddd

[edit]

Salazardaviddd (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos, metadata is always missing. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small GIF, replaceable by larger PNG File:Ar050155hf1.png. DMacks (talk) 05:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Chem Sim 2001. The double-bond between the two N is a little hard to see. When I made File:M-Azipropofol.png, ChemDraw wanted to place the "second" line inside the ring, which made it pretty short. Changing the centering of the two lines (the PNG I uploaded) improved it IMO. DMacks (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. I tried to improve its visibility by centering the double bond and I think it's easier to see now. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:58, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. DMacks (talk) 07:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality depiction of chromate ion, not used; three alts in Category:Chromate ion. Wostr (talk) 23:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:31, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite of uncited files, different size of atoms, unrealistic model. Wostr (talk) 23:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:32, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality drawing, alt. image: File:Sodium-chromate.svg. Wostr (talk) 23:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 22:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Js46358

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Js46358 (talk · contribs):

Per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Schloss depicted person is non-notable, out of project scope. I nominated Wikidata item for deletion as well. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept the images and the category per Gymnicus; apparently not notable for English-language Wikipedia, but other projects may have different notability criteria, and File:Sabrina Schloss 2.png is currently in use in Wikidata (COM:INUSE). So not obviously out of scope; there might also be other uses for pictures from this show. Gallery page Sabrina Schloss was already speedily deleted per COM:CSD#GA2, with which I agree. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yilku1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The Legislative Decree 822 cited in the summary does not say anything at all about freely licensing this photograph (i.e. it's not in the public domain): Wdwd (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Эта карта неправилна, и она была изменена искусственно! — Preceding unsigned comment added by VASHGIRD (talk • contribs) 02:26, 12 May 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

The allegations of Mr.VASHGIRD (that the map was incorrect or artificially modified) were done without any proof. The source map of KG-Batken-Batken.svg is osm.org. Nothing was changed or modified manually from the source map (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=9/39.9024/71.0138). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kmaksat (talk • contribs) 09:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. The map is used in multiple projects. It does not matter, how many mistakes does it have, per COM:INUSE if the file is used, then it is automatically in project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Taivo.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per COM:INUSE. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from World of Tanks; not real. DerpGunKV2 (talk) 22:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted screenshot. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:56, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect information, and i want to reupload than to edit breadTalk (talk) 20:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image. No cameradata. Resized picture from original. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking down the deletion request. Because according to COM:AGF this person may be the copyright holder for this photograph. Sorry for the misunderstanding. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ranjithsiji Deletion requests, once started, must run to conclusion Timtrent (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep EXIF is not required for pictures uploaded in Commons. If we suspect the uploader is not the copyright owner, we can ask for COM:OTRS, but here I do not see any reason to doubt the uploader as per COM:Assume good faith. --Sreejith K (talk) 21:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, own work is unlikely. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Netora as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, out of project scope. I cannot categorize it even into "People of X country", because country is unknown. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Netora as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10  — billinghurst sDrewth 03:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, depicted person is non-notable per en:Jordan Dean. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copied off the web, such as http://web.archive.org/web/20170821030107/thegreatoceanliners.com/mauretania2.html . Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image. No cameradata. Resized picture from original. Clear copyright violation of original photographer. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am taking down the deletion request. Because according to COM:AGF this person may be the copyright holder for this photograph. Sorry for the misunderstanding. --Ranjithsiji (talk) 20:25, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ranjithsiji Deletion requests, once started, must run to conclusion Timtrent (talk) 20:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This photo is a selfie and we can see the mobile phone in the sunglass of the subject. We need COM:OTRS --Sreejith K (talk) 21:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, own work is unlikely. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vivo LittleGun (talk) 05:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, no evidence of copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 06:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:13, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 06:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:15, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 06:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtfully own work. Globally used once on an article made a couple of days ago. Very likely a copyright violation. Anarchyte (talkwork) 07:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Leo Roesler.jpg (small unused photo without metadata). These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 07:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 07:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is still protected under copyright and should be deleted.--Ipigott (talk) 08:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 07:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This is still protected under copyright and should be deleted.--Ipigott (talk) 08:08, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:19, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 07:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TherasTaneel: I agree. This and the other two items are still protected under copyright and should be deleted.--Ipigott (talk) 08:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:45, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:22, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights shouldn't have expired yet, unless some strange rule about churches makes it so. TherasTaneel (talk) 07:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Soldier illustration ca 1942, can not be own work Drakosh (talk) 09:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Military phone blueprint ca 1942, can not be own work Drakosh (talk) 09:24, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Данный чертёж выполнен мной лично с использованием бесплатной учебной лицензионной копии программы Компас 3Д. За основу был взят оригинальный телефонный аппарат выпуска 1945 года. Могу перезагрузить данное изображение дополнив поля об авторстве своим ником (внесение имени в рамках правил википедии не имеет смысла). Мне как автору принадлежат все авторские права на это изображение. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kursant504 (talk • contribs) 10:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

На следующей неделю перерисую чертёж и сделаю его с отличием от ранее опубликованных мной на форумах и загружу новую версию. Думаю тогда проблем быть не должно.Kursant504 (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please delete this image. I was thinking that I will use it in wiki, but I can't do this because it will be my own research. Kursant504 (talk) 07:48, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:11, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mistake. More correct description file:K2godun.jpg. Dim Grits (talk) 09:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment But the file is still used. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I replaced the uses and will delete the file as scaled-down duplicate. This is the uploader's only contribution, source is missing. Taivo (talk) 10:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:49, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:50, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:54, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:55, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 09:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:56, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement 94.45.0.106 10:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

source https://genplankorolev.ru/09273452354 94.45.0.106 10:06, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 10:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 10:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 10:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:03, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 10:13, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculpture is copyrighted. {{NoFoP-Russia}}. Clarissy. 19:08, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Monument by Mukhina who died in 1953. No FoP in Russia. A.Savin 23:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -FASTILY 00:50, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree sculpture: this 3D artwork from Russia which does not provide commercial freedom of panorama for non-architectural works was unveiled in 1937 and created by w:Vera Mukhina who died in 1953. Violation of artist's copyright, and this will only fall in public domain on January 1, 2024 (70 1 years after the sculptor's death). But as the country has no FOP for non-architecture, Russian sculptures may face additional restriction on Commons due to COM:URAA (restoration of U.S. copyright on global works). Maybe undelete in 2043 (95 1 years from the date of its publication which was its unveiling date). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Will be undeleted in 2033 (95 1 years from erection). Taivo (talk) 11:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree sculpture: this 3D artwork from Russia which does not provide commercial freedom of panorama for non-architectural works was unveiled in 1937 and created by w:Vera Mukhina who died in 1953. Violation of artist's copyright, and this will only fall in public domain on January 1, 2024 (70 1 years after the sculptor's death). But as the country has no FOP for non-architecture, Russian sculptures may face additional restriction on Commons due to COM:URAA (restoration of U.S. copyright on global works). Maybe undelete in 2043 (95 1 years from the date of its publication which was its unveiling date).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose for these files:

--Kaganer (talk) 12:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaganer: I would agree to the applicability of de minimis to File:Рабочий и колхозница, Москва, - Worker and Kolkhoz Woman, Moscow 3.jpg, File:Рабочий и колхозница, Москва, - Worker and Kolkhoz Woman, Moscow.jpg, and File:Moscow, Worker and Kolkhoz Woman from Central Pavilion (544).jpg, if the lower monumental structure is an architecture. But for the rest in the 1st group, I doubt de minimis applies because removing the sculpture diminishes the value/usability of the images. For the 2nd group, the nationalities of uploaders or the location of the uploading process do not matter. The main issue here is the work itself. Even if the images were by Wikimedians from countries with FOP or uploaded from FOP-compatible countries, these can still be reused by Russians in a way that infringes the sculptor's heirs' copyright over the sculpture. For one example (a Philippine FOP case), the file in question was uploaded by a user from a country with FOP. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This case is badly resolved. Wikimedia Commons is a worldwide site, and restrictive laws in separated countries shouldn't prevent citizens of other countries from publishing and re-using images under free licenses. An analog of this is restrictive "museum law" (including in Russia). For these cases, we could be marking these images with a special warning template. But I consider the removal of such images to be a manifestation of "copyright paranoia".
Therefore, as long as at least one country of the world has "freedom of panorama", the publication of such images on Wikimedia Commons is possible, and their removal from here is unreasonable.
Also, the situation with "No FOP" restrictions applies to further (re-)using, but not to the original publication itself.
There are many different restrictions on (re-)using in different countries. It is the responsibility of users, not publishers, to comply with such restrictions in their home country. --Kaganer (talk) 14:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaganer: maybe you have heard of the 2012 Oldenburg take down notice against WikiCommons, and the 2015 attempt by then French MEP Cavada to eliminate commercial FOP from the EU (with both Wikimedia and Facebook as his special mentions), which fortunately didn't succeed. For this reason Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle has been formulated and constantly upheld. Perhaps such "copyright paranoia" will end if all 200 countries have commercial freedom of panorama, which I doubt will happen soon (some countries even restricted their exceptions, for instance Costa Rica, Honduras, and Nicaragua restricted their FOP-type provisions to personal/noncommercial uses only during the 2000s). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Precautionary principle" is good rule, but my speech was about other topic.
Perhaps, in general, no image is free according to the laws of at least some country. The right of a photographer to publish his own photograph under a free license should in no way be confused with the user's rights in a particular country. In addition, such an exclusive concern for mythical commercial users (personally unknown to me), to the detriment of millions of non-commercial users - I consider it extremely unfair and contrary to the mission of Wikimedia. --Kaganer (talk) 19:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaganer: I'm afraid that I would support  Delete File:Vera Muhhina Tööline ja kolhoositar Moskva VDNH 74.jpg because it only depicts the sculpture, and no building parts are available for this one. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:22, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, but some are  kept. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:44, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Høm died in 1994, so the rights haven't expired yet. TherasTaneel (talk) 11:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very blurry, bad quality, many better files:Pietà in Saint Peter's Basilica Oursana (talk) 11:16, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, we have 88 photos in the category, most of them very similar, so I decide to delete the file, because its quality is really bad. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Mostly a photo of a video recording. sугсго 11:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Mann, Sorgen habt ihr! Sogar ein Akkreditierung hatte ich. -- Bwag (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Du hast überwiegend eine Videoleinwand fotografiert: der Lichtbildner (amtlich in Österreich auch "Hersteller" des auf die Videoleinwand übertragenden Bildes) hat ein Leistungsschutzrecht nach 74 UrhG (Österreich); dessen Freigabe brauchst du für die Lizensierung von Erzeugnissen, die unter Nutzung des Schutzgegenstandes entstehen. sугсго 19:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Jaja, da hat man als Fotograf vom Veranstalter eine Akkreditierung, aber das Podium des Veranstalters mit der Leinwand darf ich nicht ablichten. Für das brauche ich eine eigene Erlaubnis - sagt nicht der Veranstalter, sondern irgendein selbsternannter Syndikus auf Commons. Bwag (talk) 19:57, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wenn du bei einer Pressevorführung eines Kinofilms bist, würdest du auch nicht auf die Idee kommen, dass du abfilmen dürftest. sугсго 17:27, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wer für eine Parteiveranstaltung mit Live-Reden die Aufführung eines Filmwerkes als "Analogie" heranzieht, der hat ziemliche Defizite im Verständnis des Urheberrechts.--Chianti (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hier gibt es aber keinen "Lichtbildner", da kein Bild aufgenommen wurde. Es wurde nur ein Livebild auf die Leinwand projiziert, es wurde kein Lichtbild hergestellt iSd UrhG. Es gibt in diesem Fall kein schutzfähiges "Erzeugnis", die Foto-Akkreditierung umfasst selbstverständlich auch solche rein technische Wiedergaben.--Chianti (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A video with 4.606 × 3.071 resolution? This deletion request ist a joke, if not deliberate disruption.--Chianti (talk) 20:05, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have you considered reading up a bit on copyright law before bothering the rest of us with your nonsense? sугсго 19:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Have you considered understanding a bit on copyright law before bothering us with your fringe theories about pictures and confusing them with public performances?--Chianti (talk) 19:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, per COM:FOP Austria, photos of presentation screenshots are allowed only if they are permanently in public places. But here the presentation is not permanent and not in public place, so OTRS-permission from presentation creator is needed to restore the photo. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

actually it not the photo of gorka rifles ,it is of assam regiment . gorkha brigade wears black spades 117.208.91.49 11:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. We can rename files and change descriptions. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Taivo (talk) 10:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo of 3d object: no author, no source. — Redboston 12:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, still no author and no acceptable source. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nicht mehr benötigt. Lennart Zieger (talk) 12:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, superseded by file:Foto Taufname Tz 102 Jever.jpg. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Möglicher Datenmissbrauch der Lot (Charge) Nummer im ersten noch aufrufbaren Bild bei Wiki. - . Impfpassfälschungen nehmen in erschreckender nach Pressemeldungen Weise zu- Ich Bitte um Logbuchlöschung der ersten Bildversion, damit Chargenummer nicht mehr aufrufbar ist! Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 13:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, unused file. I do not see educational value and delete the file as out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Locksteel888

[edit]

This user is uploading photos first published on Instagram by @_marcelsiebert who travels around the world taking nature photos. Uploader describes him/herself as "a 17 year old kid" (source)

Thuresson (talk) 13:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I am also adding the following photo:


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date of first publication is not given; {{PD-AR-Photo}}} requires that the photo was first published at least 20 years ago in addition to at least 25 years having passed since creation of the photograph. Date "October 2007" in the file description is certainly wrong. Template says "Warning: date and source of any publication prior to 20 year old must be indicated". Gestumblindi (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found online published prior to upload here, copyvio or needs COM:OTRS. P 1 9 9   14:18, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work! Architect Backström & Reinius (dead 1992 and 1995), not free! Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted after copyright expiration in 2066 (70 1 years from death of last author). Taivo (talk) 12:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work! Architect Backström & Reinius (dead 1992 and 1995), not free! Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 12:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted after copyright expiration in 2066 (70 1 years from death of last author). Taivo (talk) 12:30, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work! Architect Backström & Reinius (dead 1992 and 1995), not free! Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 15:05, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, will be undeleted after copyright expiration in 2066 (70 1 years from death of last author). Taivo (talk) 12:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple forms of geometry, not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, I did not find the logo from en.wiki. Out of project scope due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. The logo is ineligible for copyright, but the organization seems non-notable and the logo is likely out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, threshold of originality in Thailand is unknown, but I take courage to decide, that this is simple logo. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. This is textlogo and ineligible for copyright. Out of project scope as logo of non-notable organization (not mentioned in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 14:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text, not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, in my opinion this is complex logo, not only plain text. Taivo (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:55, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and extremely simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, in my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Oesterreicher12 as Logo Chianti (talk) 15:56, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and extremely simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 15:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, it is not a logo. Islamic calligraphy is copyrightable, but I believe here own work. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Little Savage as Logo Chianti (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If so, Let's delete this file and keep File:Sport5 Logo.png, As they are duplicated. OmriTalk 14:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, scaled-down duplicate. Taivo (talk) 13:15, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Little Savage as Logo Chianti (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright.--Chianti (talk) 16:10, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, difficult decision. I consulted COM:TOO Israel and decide, that the logo is simple. Taivo (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for 3D sculptures in the United States. Subject is a 2013 work by en:Gillie and Marc who are both still alive. Publication needs permission from them via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:24, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alen Scuric Purger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Compilation of photos that can be found on-line on different sources (example and example), even on gettyimages. Most photos don't have EXIF. No original authors or permissions.

Smooth O (talk) 16:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:26, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama for 3D sculptures in the United States. Subject is a 2018 work by en:Gillie and Marc who are both still alive. Publication needs permission from them via COM:OTRS. Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:30, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:32, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely not own work: missing meta data and often used in Albanian media before image was uploaded here: e.g. https://tvklan.al/shuhet-guljelm-radoja-artisti-i-merituar-humb-betejen-me-covid/ https://www.radiokosovaelire.com/ne-moshen-75-vjecare-ka-vdekur-aktori-shqiptar-guljem-radoja/ https://gazetasi.al/i-semure-me-covid-19-guljem-radoja-ne-gjendje-te-rende-shendetesore/ Albinfo (talk) 16:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:33, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

most likely a YouTube screenshot Albinfo (talk) 16:32, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says "own work" but https://quthermo.umbc.edu/group-members/sebastian-deffner/ says © University of Maryland, Baltimore County Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:33, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Melllsi

[edit]

All images uploaded by User:Melllsi should be deleted because they are all grabbed from the web:

In addition, they are all low quality and have no meta data. Some of them are quite olf. No reason to belief that they are "own work".

See also:

--Albinfo (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:38, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright 95.239.204.73 18:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:49, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of web page, unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:50, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently copied from a text book, unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:52, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 18:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book title page, unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:56, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book title page, unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently copied from a textbook, unlikely to be own work Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:55, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo itself might be too simple for copyright. But the colored background is probably not. Ruthven (msg) 18:43, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, due to background. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 14:01, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'll AGF and assume this to be "own work" (a photo taken of a person's own identity card), I was unable to find evidence that the card design was licensed under a free license. Not sure if this is under TOO or not, but putting it here for discussion. EpicPupper (talk) 18:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

With the exception of the styled "ISIC" letters there are only standard geometrical objects. But also the "ISIC" letters do not have originality required for copyright: compare here: "not possible". Whgler (talk) 20:31, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, complex design. Taivo (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of math formula that should better be typeset in TeX Jochen Burghardt (talk) 18:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be the subject’s Twitter profile photo, origin unverified: https://www.rasjodoigne.be/news/romain-puttemans-pilier-de-la-defense-des-canaris-prolonge/ Ytoyoda (talk) 23:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Of low resolution and of no real use or purpose anymore. Has been globally replaced by the vectorized File:Blason province fr Artois.svg. Glorious 93 (talk) 20:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some discussion needs to take place about the file. It exists elsewhere online, though that might be using here as a source. See https://networthandsalary.com/siti-nordiana-alias/ for a cropped version and https://www.astroawani.com/berita-hiburan/siti-nordiana-dan-khai-bahar-bakal-kejutkan-peminat-185697 for a full version.

Even so there are no camera details, no extended details at all, which is unusual for a modern picture. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

That the file is widely used ought not to affect the outcome of the discussion, but I have seen it affect it sometimes. Timtrent (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:G2H&A51

[edit]

This requests concerns G2H&A51 (talk · contributions · Move log · Statistics · logs · block log)

This contributor has the same modus operandi as User:Locksteel888 whose files I have nominated for deletion today: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Locksteel888. Both users upload photos from Instagram account @_marcelsiebert. Also, both users have an interest in the article en:Ray Dalio at English Wikipedia and question of multiple accounts have come up there (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:G2H&A51&oldid=1017229104 link]).

Thuresson (talk) 20:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'l delete all his contributions as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All the user's contributions to Wikipedia have been deleted as hoaxes/alternate history. This does not represent a real flag, rather this is fiction created by the user. Fences and windows (talk) 21:19, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also nominating for the same reason:

Fences and windows (talk) 21:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as low quality ms-paint images of hoax flags that are therefore outside of commons scope - there's no possible project use for these. There's also:
from the same uploader, which also appears to be a hoax. 192.76.8.91 13:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

messed up Amberdee18 (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Messed up copyright Amberdee18 (talk) 22:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:57, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chianti as no permission (No permission since) MB-one (talk) 22:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, big photo with EXIF, no evidence of copyvio. Claimed own work – why not? Taivo (talk) 09:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chianti as no permission (No permission since) MB-one (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was ist an diesem Bild nicht korrekt? Nur weil damals die WMF oder wer auch immer beim Übertrag von deWP nach Commons gepfuscht hat, soll das jetzt gelöscht werden? Ich glaube, es hackt. Es ist mit AGF davon auszugehen, dass das alles gepasst hat, und nurt beim Übertrag was nicht übertragen wurde. Ich sehe als Aufgabe der WMF an, solche Sachen gerade zu biegen, unter anderem genau dafür gibt es bezahlte Devs. Wenn nicht dafür wofür sollte die Community sonst Devs beschäftigen? Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 16:37, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Es scheint noch absurder zu sein: Es geht vorgeblich um den Urheberschutz des Pokals (uns vielleicht auch des Autos und des Jackets?), der hier irgendwo mit abgebildet wurde in dem eindeutig der Panoramafreiheit unterliegenden Bild, völlig absurder Unsinn. Kann ich das hier selber wegmachen, oder muss für das Beseitigen von solch offensichtlichen Löschvandalismus unbedingt ein Admin ran? Grüße vom Sänger ♫ (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, no evidence of copyvio. The license was reviewed by a bot. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value beyond File:DSC 0180 (49251300166).jpg (uploader request) Tokfo (talk) 22:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really very similar photos. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken of an image on the PC or TV screen. Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyrighted screenshot. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published prior to upload at https://www.rasjodoigne.be/news/romain-puttemans-pilier-de-la-defense-des-canaris-prolonge/ Ytoyoda (talk) 23:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:50, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of valid license. Uploader set "own-work", but source is "Legislative Assembly of Santa Catarina". Assembly's site doesn't have a CC-BY-SA mark, so the uploader probably copied this image from there without proper license and uploaded to Commons as "own-work" stanglavine msg 23:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same book as File:The vintage; a romance of the Greek war of independence (IA vintageromanceof00bensrich).pdf, but has two pages missing from the scan,so no point retaining it. I have deleted the only instance of its use on enWS. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 23:48, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think it should be here. Marqwezzuh (talk) 23:51, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Monisiolek

[edit]

Monisiolek (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

OTRS-permission from author MikoSnup is needed. No evidence, that uploader is the same person. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Cemil Turan Bazidi

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Cemil Turan Bazidi (talk · contribs):

Book covers need OTRS-permission from copyright holder, presumably from cover artist. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gerg2013

[edit]

Gerg2013 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Bulgaria and the photos violate architects' copyright. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:27, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Peppapig1235q

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Peppapig1235q (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Egrino

[edit]

Egrino (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Richa101091

[edit]

Richa101091 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Different size, metadata is missing (with one exception). I suspect copyright violation.


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:28, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Oliver515

[edit]

Oliver515 (talk · contribs) uploaded a lot of files claimed own work. If we take Apple iPhone 5a as own camera, then these photos remain:

Different resolutions and cameras. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This flag is fictional and original research, which has no educational significance but misleading. Most importantly, this flag is the same as the File:幽燕十字旗.png ("Yuyencia Cross Flag") , which was deleted in 2017. See this page. --Ngguls(UTC) 01:01, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:14, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

名前を間違いました 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 03:52, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We can rename files. What is correct filename? Taivo (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

名前を間違いました。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 03:53, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment We can rename files. What is correct filename? Taivo (talk) 09:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The texture on the letters is not too simple for copyright. It is on the letters but it separate from the letters. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:48, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This does not have a US copyright -- fonts, even fancy fonts, never have a US copyright. However, the creators of the video game are Polish and I don;t know what the standard is there. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It seems that there are two reasons for which a logo may be ineligible for copyright in the United States:
  1. Because it lacks originality, or
  2. Because it consists of lettering.
There is some discussion about the difference between reason #1 and reason #2 in [http://www.ipmall.info/hosted_resources/CopyrightAppeals/2004/Mark Hendricksen.pdf this document], in particular on pp. 7-8, where File:D'ni Letters Vs Numerals.png was ruled to be uncopyrightable. The United States Copyright Office noted that it was not necessary to determine if the material was ineligible for copyright protection under reason #1 as it was already ineligible for copyright protection under reason #2. We should probably use different copyright tags for United States logos depending on whether we used reason #1 or reason #2. The tag {{PD-textlogo}} specifically seems to discuss originality (that is, reason #1) and seems unsuitable for logos which are ineligible for copyright per reason #2. We don't seem to have a suitable copyright tag for reason #2 logos, although {{Useful-object-US}} may be a bit related.
Unfortunately, reason #2 typically doesn't seem to exist in Europe, so you normally only have reason #1 to consider. File:Aalborg Broncestøberi skrifttype A, B og D.png from Denmark is a prime example of this: someone sued someone else for copyright violation of five different fonts. The court ruled that three of the fonts were below the threshold of originality but that the other two fonts were copyrightable. I have no idea how fonts are handled under Polish copyright law, though.
The website ipmall.info, to which I tried to link above, seem to be blocked by a spam filter. No idea why; we have several links to the website at COM:TOO, including the link I provided above. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination COM:PRP. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As previously discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Call of Juarez logo.jpg OhanaUnitedTalk page 04:22, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 04:37, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Source country Switzerland has freedom of panorama. But educational value seems quite weak, maybe the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely PERMANENTLY in public space, FoP does not apply Krd 07:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Netora as no permission (No permission since) Chianti (talk) 17:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio because lacking threshold of originality. Only plain text and simple geometric patterns, therefore not eligible for copyright. Should be tagged with PD-textlogo.--Chianti (talk) 17:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. We have similar logos in category:Outlook.com. I'd like to have another opinion, though. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Asqueladd as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Source (Protocolo.org) states the image cannot be used for commercial purposes, so the license is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. In any case, it is far from clear that "protocolo.org" is entitled to hold any right whatsoever, so a case of license laundering too. Wdwd (talk) 09:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Applies also to file:SM El Rey Don Felipe VI Tierra.jpg

--Wdwd (talk) 09:36, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, both by Missvain on 2nd of June. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Military phone illustration from 1942, can not be own work Drakosh (talk) 09:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Авторство исправлено, дана ссылка на источник. Указана корректная лицензияKursant504 (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - "own work" was not claimed by the uploader. It seems to fit #3 of the given template. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:18, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]