Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2020/02/09
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Offensive 99.61.185.4 03:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion COM:NOTCENSORED. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 08:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
uploaded incorrectly 2.34.208.123 08:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Rotated by Steinsplitterbot. --Achim (talk) 16:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
uploaded incorrectly 2.34.208.123 08:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Rotated by Steinsplitterbot. --Achim (talk) 16:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
per copyright Nino Cocchini (talk) 13:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
copyright Nino Cocchini (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request on day of upload. --Achim (talk) 16:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: Map of a fictional alternate reality with undefeated Austria in WW I Enyavar (talk) 10:33, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
unnecesary Mtnkarasu (talk) 13:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Érico at 14:51, 9 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 02:16, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
possible copyright violation Otrebor Oipset (talk) 17:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Ymblanter at 18:30, 9 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: ©CdT.ch - Riproduzione riservata --Krdbot 02:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Reason : Pas de licence ni d'attribution valable commentaire douteux rassemblant à une mauvaise blague/No license or valid assignment doubtful comment like a bad joke
62.4.138.209 00:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deletion: copyvio http://www.zion924.com/09_dataRoom/LeeLewaeJa/GoodTidings/GoodTidings_71_07_ser_rev07_02.htm. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:36, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Iruka13 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.werbemittel.at/multi-shape-rechteckig.html - In use on de:wp, so not eligible for speedy deletion. Achim (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Domingaufkleber_auf_Schlüsselanhänger_als_Werbeartikel.jpg” under ticket:2020021010002142. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:25, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 16:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
already exists as File:Luxembourg, 2e Porte de Trèves (plan de profil).jpg GilPe (talk) 21:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected as duplicate. --JuTa 18:28, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Deejprince.dj (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted yesterday. --Achim (talk) 21:41, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
The image is not to be found at the source so we cant verify the license. MGA73 (talk) 22:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I don't know why, but it can only be seen by a logged user at Pixabay. Adventurous36 (talk) 00:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Keep Dear MGA73 & Adventurous36 I logged into Pixabay through my Google log in password and can verify that this image is on this link and exists. It was taken in December 2011 and uploaded in April 2017 on Pixabay. I have reviewed the image. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:18, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Comment: As an aside, in this pixabay image File:Two wolf spiders inside a home.jpg I managed to upload the maximum resolution image from Pixabay. I could not do so...unless I was logged into Pixabay to retrieve that image. Now, if someone can delete the tiny FastilyClone upload file image in it. Can Lymantria do this? MGA73 is not an Admin like me. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:32, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- I can, but what could be the reason? Lymantria (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: that is awesome! Thanks a lot. I will go check my google account again. Keep just speedy close this DR! —MGA73 (talk) 12:52, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion, nominator request. --Lymantria (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
No indication of cc-by-4.0 or other free license on the source site Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well-Informed Optimist There is in fact, from the information page: "All materials from the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation website may be used by any mass media, Internet servers or any other medium without any restrictions... Only the link to the original source is required". AveTory (talk) 16:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not free license. This is equivalent of CC BY-ND that is not allowed in Wikimemedia Commons. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- The mkrf-license is old and deprecated klemlin.ru-like license. Such license must have additional permission - via OTRS (like kremlin.ru had mailed later) or via direct and clear mention of CC-BY-3.0/4.0 on site (like kremlin.ru had updated after OTRS-mail). Alex Spade (talk) 23:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Sealle (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
This file either is a copyvio or an advertisement. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 04:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 12:57, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
No permission Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 04:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 12:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Photo of a screen, no source/permission. Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 04:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 12:58, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Very likely a copyright violation of an agency photograph. Per [1], this image is "by Michael Loccisano/Getty Images". Consider also blocking the uploader, whose other uploads are similar. Sandstein (talk) 13:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 14:09, 15 Februar 2020 UTC: Copyright violation: unfree Getty image as per meta, not own work --Krdbot 20:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 12:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gait Training 2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s). Out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:선자세에서균형훈련-발판위에서아래로발닿기.webm
- File:선자세에서균형훈련-발판내려가기.webm
- File:근력강화훈련-발판올라가기.webm
- File:Gait training diagram (2).png
- File:Gait training diagram.png
- File:보행훈련흐름도.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:48, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arnie-sarkar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos by non-contributor
- File:Arnab Sarkar protein meal in El Cerrito, California.jpg
- File:Arnab Sarkar car accident in snow.jpg
- File:Arnie Sarkar in a snowy day.jpg
- File:Arnie Sarkar in Car.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:19, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Its my own cover design, but the image used in the cover is not credited. So please delete for the moment we get the correct copyrights Andrejs Volkovs (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Regasterios at 09:52, 16 Februar 2020 UTC: No permission since 8 February 2020 --Krdbot 20:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
I have no doubt that the captions are the editor’s work, but the original file seems unlikely to be. Larry Hockett (talk) 11:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete This is obviously a promotional photo taken by MLB prior to the w:2018 Major League Baseball All-Star Game (as determined by the patch on the sleeve of his jersey). Jarmusic2 is being disruptive concerning the subject of w:Mookie Betts, and so took a copyrighted photo (though I can't find the source of it) and added that disruptive caption. User deserves a trout slap. Muboshgu (talk) 21:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata. Most probably the uploader is not the author. Bogus license. Микола Василечко (talk) 11:54, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 95.160.159.245 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This is my identity in the photo and I want to remove it from the Internet
Converted by me to regular, as image is in use and to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 17:41, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Support a courtesy-deletion, as the shot doesn't look good and we have a far better image anyway, File:Anastasia Kochetkova.jpg. --Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 11 February 2020 (UTC)- Support subject request OK in this case; photo at original source is hard to find there but may continue to appear through Google anyway. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Info OTRS deletion request arrived from the subject. She confirms that she wants to delete the picture. Regards, Bencemac (talk) 07:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- Support usually I don't approve a request from the subject, but per Turelio, we can delete this image in this particular case. Edoderoo (talk) 13:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, redirected. --Sealle (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 08:18, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Youtube reports that the source video is "not available" and it's also not archived, so the CC-BY license can't be verified. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 13:26, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Нет разрешение автора или издательство на фото из журнала Dogad75 (talk) 23:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Это МОЙ снимок, я его лично снимал и передавал своему коллеге из Японии (музыканту-тубисту) по его просьбе для подготовки статьи о нашем учителе..--Канаев Николай Викторович (talk) 11:04, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Уточнение.. Автор снимков в статье я и в статье это указано..--Канаев Николай Викторович (talk) 12:40, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Scanned image. Bogus license. Frodar (talk) 23:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Only used on the German Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in February 2010 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 00:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational use, per nomination. czar 16:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Only used on the French Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in November 2013 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 00:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational use, per nomination. czar 16:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Only used on the French Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in February 2019 as non-notable. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 01:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational use, per nomination. czar 16:30, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: no educational use, per nomination. czar 16:31, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 09:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 16:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 09:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 16:40, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. czar 16:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Nonfree, low quality file Pic-Sou (talk) 10:45, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot of a copyrighted film (Predators - 2010) Civitas13 (talk) 12:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
A tineye search [2] shows the photo appearing several times on the internet prior to it being uploaded here - with the BBC [3] crediting it to Babcock, and [4] (defesaaereanaval.com.br) crediting it to Team 31 (of which Babcock is a member). No evidence that it is the own work of the uploader as claimed. Nigel Ish (talk) 14:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 01:30, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Apparent recreation of deleted file - alleged source [5] is now dead, which is strange for a file uploaded on 11 February 2022, but looking on Internet archive, there is no evidence that the photo is available under a cc-by-sa-4.0 license. In addition, the same photo [File:Arrowhead-concept-for-Type-31e-Frigate.jpg] has also been uploaded in 2019 on en:wiki as a non-Free file - non-free files are unsuitable for commons. Nigel Ish (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Delete It's not the same file as I deleted in 2020 (this one is a different and smaller photo), but I agree with the reasons for deletion. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 08:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Only uploadings (the other is File:Nat Gold.jpg]]) by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:01, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader tries to cheat by additional uploading a mirrored version
- --Achim (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and from fb per md. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
The unused and uncategorised file. Commons is not the private media repository. Only uploadings (the other is File:Nat Gold 1.jpg) by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
- Uploader tries to cheat by additional uploading a mirrored version
- --Achim (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work due to location (right next to a tv reporter) size of image, quality of image, and so on. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
promotional — Ирука13 22:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; photo of a photo. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
The image was uploaded 1 month ago so it is after they changed the license to one that is not free enough for Commons. MGA73 (talk) 22:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I'm ok for delate it, if the the license isn't allowed for Commons now (I'm the uploader) --Gb89.2 (talk) 15:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 15:25, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 15:29, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:11, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:33, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:32, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 18:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
The crack through the gentleman on the left's head and the white stripes would seem to indicate this is a rephotograph and not an original. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Unused personal image which from size and quality may not be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 20:48, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
File without text already exists on https://www.pnghunt.com/free-png-clipart-rhqub and other pages; hence very likely not "Own work" of the author. Malyacko (talk) 04:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination out of COM:SCOPE. --Ahmadtalk 20:49, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted artwork A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep: According to Copyright Ordinance (Chapter 528) (consolidated version of May 27, 2016), it is not a copyright infringement to take photographs the images of buildings and artwork.--Wpcpey (talk) 04:50, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept HK has FOP for 3D artworks.--Roy17 (talk) 15:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by TheLocomotionWithMe (talk · contribs)
[edit]No COM:FOP in Argentina.
- File:UNAJ Homenaje Diana Sacayán.jpg
- File:Paseo de la memoria estaciones (50).jpg
- File:Paseo de la memoria estaciones (43).jpg
- File:Paseo de la memoria estaciones (11).jpg
- File:Paseo de la memoria estaciones (31).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheLocomotionWithMe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:John Allan, maquinista.jpg
- File:Juan de la Cruz Contreras 02.jpg
- File:Juan de la Cruz Contreras 01.jpg
- File:Antigua Capilla escocesa Saint John.jpg
- File:Casa de Teja.jpg
- File:Antigua Estación Florencio Varela.jpg
- File:Monumento a la Bandera FV.jpg
- File:Dr. Arturo Dalmacio Vatteone.gif
- File:Plaza San Juan Bautista, Florencio Varela en el pasado.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheLocomotionWithMe (talk · contribs)
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Argentina for statues and 2D works.
- File:Pintura Plazoleta San Martín 3.jpg
- File:Pintura Plazoleta San Martín 2.jpg
- File:Pintura Plazoleta San Martín.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín SCROCCI.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín HOMBRE.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín TRABAJADOR 2.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín TRABAJADOR.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín ESCULTURA.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín SARMIENTO 3.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín SARMIENTO 2.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín SARMIENTO.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín PERÓN.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín BOCUZZI.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín MPM.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín MUJER.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín MADRE.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín LECTOR 2.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín LECTOR.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín BUSTO HUDSON 2.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín BICHO CANASTO 2.jpg
- File:Plazoleta central San Martín 03.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheLocomotionWithMe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded photographs from a wide variety of websites with or without copyright notice (the former with all rights reserved), with or without own content, and with the license he/she likes.
- File:Viedma desde el aire.jpg
- File:Gobernación de Neuquén 01.jpg
- File:Gobernación de Neuquén nocturna.jpg
- File:Catedral de Neuquén.jpg
- File:Cruz de Formosa 03.jpg
- File:Cruz de Formosa 02.jpg
- File:Iglesia Conventual Franciscana San Pedro de Alcántara 02.jpg
- File:Iglesia Conventual Franciscana San Pedro de Alcántara 01.jpg
- File:Paraná, Argentina panorama.jpg
- File:San Fernando del Valle de Catamarca panorama.jpg
- File:Formosa capital panorama.jpg
- File:Catedral de La Plata y Plaza Moreno panorama.jpg
- File:La Rioja capital panorama.jpg
- File:Resistencia, Chaco panorama.jpg
- File:Posadas, Misiones panorama.jpg
- File:San Luis Argentina panorama.jpg
- File:Rawson panorama.jpg
Frodar (talk) 08:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:50, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автор снимка, скорее всего неизвестен, фото передано изображённым на снимке лицом К. Б. Соколовым. Dogad75 (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Автор снимка сам себя снимает (со СВОЕГО фотоаппарата) со штатива, либо с помощью случайного помощника..--Канаев Николай Викторович (talk) 11:12, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автор снимка, скорее всего неизвестен, фото передано изображённым на снимке лицом К. Б. Соколовым. Dogad75 (talk) 23:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Автор снимка сам себя снимает (со СВОЕГО фотоаппарата) со штатива, либо с помощью случайного помощника..--Канаев Николай Викторович (talk) 10:58, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автор снимка и изображённая персона-одно лицо. Dogad75 (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Автор снимка сам себя снимает (со СВОЕГО фотоаппарата) со штатива, либо с помощью случайного помощника..--Канаев Николай Викторович (talk) 11:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
File:1977, ЗКР АСО Ленингр. филармонии, афиша-альбом гастрольного тура в Японии фаготист К.Б.Соколов.jpg
[edit]
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: автор снимка, скорее всего неизвестен Dogad75 (talk) 23:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Автор снимка - К.Б.Соколов, был несколько раз с оркестром в Японии и для подготовки нового турне в Японию в 1977 году передал свой снимок (с прежней поездки) для изготовления филармонией афиши-альбома. В те годы у них (в оркестре) это была распространённая практика, когда отбирались лучшие личные снимки..--Канаев Николай Викторович (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:01, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: авторские права на афишу принадлежит, скорее всего филармонии Dogad75 (talk) 23:08, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте! Сама по себе афиша капеллы (обратите внимание, что концерт посвящён 60-летнему юбилею) изготавливалась за счёт собственных средств профессора К.Б.Соколова и его учеников и авторских прав она не имеет,.. была прередана мне К.Б.Соколовым для фотографирования и использования в Википедии для создания статьи о нём..--Канаев Николай Викторович (talk) 11:19, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:02, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Claimed to be own work - but the Metadata states that the photo is the work of John Paul Filo and is copyright - all rights reserved CBS Broadcasting Inc. - No evidence that the uploader is the author or the copyright holder and no evidence that CBS has released the photo with a free license. In the absence of such evidence, the photo should be deleted. Nigel Ish (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:41, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Use COM:OTRS. — Ирука13 17:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
I understand global usage means other WIKI pages where the image may have been used, so I cannot attest to that. However, this image was marked as a possible copyright violation on the basis that it was in use by an existing link. The image is indeed of Juliet Ehimuan and I contacted her directly for the image, hence the large, hi-res file uploaded. SHE made the image available for use for the Guardian. They do not own the image, neither did they take the picture. SHE owns it and sent this directly to me. I will attach several instances of the image being used on her own verified Instagram page, if that helps:
https://www.instagram.com/p/BzLA5VllDCh/ https://www.instagram.com/p/B5lEJ8JlHIP/ https://www.instagram.com/p/B5OQ96nlLyA/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BzveVvsFMbs/ https://www.instagram.com/p/Bw72azqnYar/ https://www.instagram.com/p/BzLAjoBFCZ8/
I look forward to the image being reinstated.
Thank you. RachelOnamusi (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RachelOnamusi (talk • contribs) 17:51, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: File page without file which had been deleted on Feb 9. You can request undeletion @ COM:UDEL. --Achim (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Low-res duplicate of File:Makilala public market - Flickr.jpg. Besides, although one of the Flickr pic's tags is "kidapawan," this is actually the picture of Makilala's public market, very similar if searched online with keyword "Makilala palengke" and "Makilala public market" JWilz12345 (talk) 09:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- My basis for comparison: the subject's similarity with the one depicted in this: https://mapio.net/pic/p-86814331/ --> https://mapio.net/images-p/86814331.jpg (this is not an issue of copyvio, but rather to compare both subjects, despite the freely-licensed Flickr image having tagged "kidapawan."JWilz12345 (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
@P199: for added insight.JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:39, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as low-res duplicate of File:Makilala public market - Flickr.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
No metadata. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaju Maharjan (talk • contribs) 2020-02-06T17:12:48 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Yaju Maharjan. --Sealle (talk) 08:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, some appear to be historical images, others taken from a plane over playing fields. One more has Facebook metadata.
- File:PAS FLORINA LOGO.png
- File:Untitl.jpg
- File:DAK F.jpg
- File:Γηπεδο Πολ.jpg
- File:Dak flv.jpg
- File:Α.π..jpg
- File:Untitledς.jpg
- File:Παλιά ομάδα.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:02, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reed Warbler (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously published (halftoned) but unsourced images. "From a publisher" is not source data.
- File:Stemmer Ödön új üzlete belülről.jpg
- File:Stemmer Ödön új antikváriuma a Fürdő utca 14 szám alatt.jpg
- File:Stemmer Ödön első üzlete a Fürdő utca 9 szám alatt.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader requested. I lack a proper source for this image. I can re-create it if I find one in the future. Fry1989 eh? 00:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Contents appear to be taken from several sources from the internet. Inconsistent metadata ranging from several different camera models, Facebook metadata, lack of metadata, and album covers. Should be deleted per COM:PCP.
- File:The Wings album giáng sinh.jpg
- File:The Wings Phiên Bản Hoàn Hảo.jpg
- File:Mini album Xfactor Collection.jpg
- File:The Wings chung kết Nhân Tố Bí Ẩn.jpg
- File:Duy Ngọc chung ket Sao Mai 2015.jpg
- File:The Wings Band - Thảm đỏ Zing Music Award.jpg
- File:Single Đường Nào Đến Trái Tim Em.jpg
- File:Fanclub The Wings Band tại Hồ Chí Minh.jpg
- File:Fanclub The Wings Band ở Hải Phòng.jpg
- File:Windy - Tên fanclub của The Wings Band.jpg
- File:The Wings Band.jpg
ƏXPLICIT 00:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Loksabha Secretary (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://loksabhaph.nic.in/Copyright.aspx?linkid=1
- File:Sukanta Majumdar.jpg
- File:Deepak Adhikari.jpg
- File:Shatabdi Roy.jpg
- File:Jayanta Kumar Roy MP.jpg
- File:John Barla MP.jpg
- File:Kakoli Dastidar MP.jpg
- File:Khan Soumitra MP.jpg
- File:Khagen Murmu MP.jpg
- File:Nisith Pramanick MP.jpg
- File:Kunar Hembram MP.jpg
- File:Sukanta Majumdar MP.jpg
- File:Subhash Sarkar MP.jpg
- File:Jotirmay Mahato MP.jpg
- File:Jagannath Sarkar MP.jpg
- File:Shantanu Thakur MP.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:36, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 | If you are the copyright holder, please email our permissions verification team (VRT). | →  |
Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR since source does not specify a free license. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:CV https://vk.com/gorod_kch?z=photo-46359936_457241116/album-46359936_00/rev Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:CV https://vk.com/gorod_kch?z=photo-46359936_457240880/album-46359936_00/rev Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 17:25, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:CV https://vk.com/photo5253305_457247952?rev=1 Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:CV https://vk.com/photo5253305_457247955?rev=1 Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:09, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
COV:CV https://vk.com/gorod_kch?z=photo-46359936_457240692/wall-46359936_4411 Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 17:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:10, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
COM:CV https://vk.com/photo5253305_457247474?rev=1 Vyacheslav Bukharov (talk) 17:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:32, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image is a mirror derivative of my image File:Merging Traffic From Left sign (Botswana).svg. Since this file's uploader has been banned for abusing multiple accounts, I believe it is appropriate for me to take over stewardship of this image.
I have now nominated my file for deletion because I lack a proper source. I believe this file should also be deleted for the same reason. Fry1989 eh? 00:19, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:00, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: EXIF - Copyright holder COPYRIGHT, 2010 seems worrying... however to be sent to speedy the evidence has to be unabiguous. I find this copyright data ambiguous, but would point out file size and "quality" also suggest it is borrowed not owned. As a final note, not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: "COPYRIGHT, 2010" is IMO not sufficiant to delete, however, seeing the copyvios already uploaded by the user and the lacks of consistent EXIFS, it is unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:05, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Small image without sufficient EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:06, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Per cited reason at File:Fluvial Parade 2013.jpg - probable copyright violation and non-free Internet photographs.
- File:Surfers Borongan.jpg
- File:Padul-ong1.jpg
- File:Padul-ong2.jpg
- File:Padul-ong.jpg
- File:Fiesta-mass.jpg
- File:Fluvial Parade 2013 (3).jpg
- File:Fluvial Parade 2013 (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Cited reason: Just another non-free image from the Internet. See Commons:Image casebook#Internet images. JWilz12345 (talk) 02:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - small sizes without EXIFs, unlikely to be own works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unauthorized derivative work of a copyrighted board game. See COM:TOYS. Own mistake acknowledged. TaurusEmerald (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:08, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Unauthorized derivative work of a copyrighted board game. See COM:TOYS. Own mistake acknowledged. TaurusEmerald (talk) 02:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
See COM:Toys. Own mistake acknowledged. TaurusEmerald (talk) 03:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:09, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
"White House Photos" is an unverified Twitter account, not at all "official". There is no credible evidence that William Moon is a federal government employee acting in an official capacity: see Snopes and Vox. --Animalparty (talk) 03:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
I'm the owner of the image and I do not want to keep it here for personal reasons — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kousai Doshka (talk • contribs) 2020-02-07T01:33:57 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:12, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Screenshot Minoraxtalk (formerly 大诺史) 04:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:19, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
This drawing exists on the Internet, on the wartsila website -- https://www.wartsila.com/media/news/09-07-2019-wartsila-achieves-new-marine-benchmark-with-hybrid-solution-for-bulk-carriers-2486688 (even larger version, direct image, on another website). However, those do have some extra arrows on it, which this does not, but it's clearly the same drawing. It seems to be signed under the stern of the ship, and that name does not seem to match the uploader. We may need COM:OTRS permission from Wartsila to keep this, presuming the drawing was a work for hire. (The purpose seems to be to show a piece of new equipment Wartsila was installing on the ship, which is also present in this drawing.) Carl Lindberg (talk) 06:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo.--Kai3952 (talk) 06:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep What about the rest of the set, then Category:WMF Education Asia site visit Taiwan 2017? Could see these having potential educational use. czar 16:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Czar: Potential? I don't see where it would be useful. Can you please make it clear why exactly you think that this personal photo having educational use?--Kai3952 (talk) 07:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- (1) As a depiction of the temple (2) As a depiction of the workshop (no different from the rest of the category) czar 11:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Czar: Potential? I don't see where it would be useful. Can you please make it clear why exactly you think that this personal photo having educational use?--Kai3952 (talk) 07:33, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as per czar. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:22, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
unused, small, bad quality. Almost same is File:Vector lliure.svg Estopedist1 (talk) 07:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
The file is an image about City of London Police, in which it is found in this Flickr page, clearly stating the file is all rights reserved. Background check of the account also shows that the Flickr account produces their own original images. The file is therefore very likely to be copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 07:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:24, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Suspicious in terms of source and license. Dr. Coal (talk) 07:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - bogus license, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:27, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Doublon avec le fichier "Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB1" et de moins bonne qualité Kev22 (talk) 16:21, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 17:08, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality, unusable and duplicated with: File:Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB nuit1.jpg. Kev22 (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Doublon avec le fichier "Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB - Intérieur" et de moins bonne qualité Kev22 (talk) 16:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 17:09, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
This is my photo and I want to delete it because it is of poor quality, unusable and duplicated with: File:Heuliez GX 127 L n°280 - TUB - Intérieur nuit.jpg. Kev22 (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader own work but rather a Google Maps Street View photo (see there). Note the not so great quality of the image, the lack of full metadata , the same position of shadows of Google Maps image and the fact that the hedge near the parking sign is blurred as in Google Maps. Civitas13 (talk) 11:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Vera (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Olamide on the set of his "Sitting on The Throne" music video in January 2014 2014-04-21 13-19.jpg
[edit]
I highly doubt that this photo was taken by User:Tensei Johnson. The exact image with the same red frame can be found on other web sites from 2014, e.g. https://kofolyrics.wordpress.com/2014/03/23/lyrics-olamide-sitting-on-the-throne/ Malyacko (talk) 04:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I'm not sure if this is the same file that has been deleted previously, but this time there is no evidence of permission. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:39, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
URV-Verdacht (z.B. http://gartenliege.projetdemoskratos.com/blaue.html) rolf_acker (talk • contributions • log) 10:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hallo. Es ist kein URV-Problem. Ich habe die Leute von der Hauptwebsite der Blauen Wende gefragt, ob ich das Bild verwenden kann. Dem wurde zugestimmt. Zudem ist es auf archive.org auch frei zugänglich und damit ohnehin für alle nutzbar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schellhörnchen (talk • contribs) 17:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Facebook download- FBMD01000abc030000891100003e250000de250000dc26000066300000054a00001e4e0000715000008253000033820000 — Delwar • 10:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:38, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyright violation Solomon Dandy (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Solomon Dandy, es wäre ganz nett wenn du mir erklären würdest warum du einen auf diesen selbst im Englischen Wiki ist das Poster vorhanden wenn du mir nicht glaubst schau selber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_the_Hedgehog_(film) <--- Link zum Artikel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sonic_the_Hedgehog_poster.jpg <--- Link zum Bild Erkläre deine Entscheidung weil in meinen Augen ist die Entscheidung unbegründet.
Gruß Achampnator — Preceding unsigned comment added by Achampnator (talk • contribs) 13:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: by EugeneZelenko. --Didym (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Copyvio - the person who has uploaded the picture is not its author. No permission has been provided. Pawel Niemczuk (talk) 12:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Credited to https://www.df1-nascar.com/df1-racing-with-outstanding-alain-mosqueron-on-title-defending-course-in-the-2020-euronascar-club-challenge/ Ytoyoda (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
The picture has been taken by my smartphone but sent to DF1 Racing to publish some news about the trip of the driver JerichoRossi (talk) 17:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Author cannot be Toporovsky as he is in the photo. Uploaded by a paid editor. Number 57 (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 14:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Previously published at https://m.facebook.com/DF1Nascar/posts/time-for-some-nice-pictures-of-2019/2793881114171577/, requires OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 15:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
And also:
Not own images false own work claim. Scanned images. Bogus license. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Valentin Pepe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small photos with no metadata; unlikely to be own work.
- File:Tito 14.jpg
- File:Tito 5.jpg
- File:Tito16.jpg
- File:Tito 18.jpg
- File:Tito 17.jpg
- File:Tito 11.jpg
- File:Tito 8.jpg
- File:Tito 1.jpg
- File:Donto Motor Company P1.jpg
- File:Top Race 2016 pelotón.jpg
- File:Mitsubishi Racing TC2000 2004.jpg
- File:Renault Clio Turismo Nacional.jpg
- File:Renault Daster Argentina Dakar 2017.jpg
Ahmadtalk 16:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Not educationally helpful, no context. Out of scope. 2001:4BB8:25C:130D:3D27:12A3:52CE:381F 16:38, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I do not see educational value. Maybe the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AsmaAfzal1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:32, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful.
- File:Nicht lineare Regression tabelle.pdf
- File:2019-12-28 11 14 03-Unbenannt 1 - LibreOffice Calc.png
- File:Tabelle verhulst.jpg
- File:Rohdatentabelle.png
- File:Nicht lineare Regression Variabeln.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 11:23, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:2020-02-05 08 56 42-Bevölkerungswachstum.ods - LibreOffice Calc.png
- File:Allefunktionen.png
- File:Poly4 euler.png
- File:Quadrat euler.png
- File:Regr quadratisch.png
- File:Wachstumsratenregression linear3.png
- File:Wachstumsratenregression quadratisch.png
- File:Wachstumsratenregression linear2.png
- File:Wachstumsratenregression linear a(t).png
- File:Wachstumsratenregression linear.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:31, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Neuallesinallem2.png
- File:Neuallesinallem.png
- File:2020-02-04 11 02 52-Unbenannt 1 - LibreOffice Writer.png
- File:2020-02-04 11 02 29-Unbenannt 1 - LibreOffice Writer.png
- File:2020-02-04 10 44 39-Unbenannt 1 - LibreOffice Writer.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Zyklus1 10L.png
- File:Allesineinem neu.jpg
- File:Wachstumsraten alle neu.jpg
- File:Graphpoly4neu.jpg
- File:Wachstumsrate Polynom4.png
- File:2020-02-05 09 04 00-Bevölkerungswachstum.ods - LibreOffice Calc.png
- File:Regr poly4.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 03:16, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation (taken from Shutterstock here), used to illustrate a fake biography. — Yerpo Eh? 19:27, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
File was uploaded to pixabay about 11 months ago so it is AFTER they changed the license to a license that is not free enough for Commons. MGA73 (talk) 22:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 14:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of a copyrighted work. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - Blurred character out, The inside-building is sort of in it so would rather keep based on that. –Davey2010Talk 10:04, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not worth to keep a photo which is blurred main subject. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete What educational use is left for this image if the subject is blurred out? Its surroundings? Best to delete altogether. czar 16:33, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Perhaps we can consider the redacted picture shows the interior of the venue. Although it's not much, Category:Japan_Expo_2016 (surprisingly) doesn't reveal the venue much either. whym (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Czar Please see Whym's comment - This is the precise reason why I've opted for keeping, If there were other images that showed the interior then to be blunt we wouldn't be having this discussion now, We can't read our viewers mind and so whilst some may come here purely to use an image others may want to know other things like the interior of the building etc...... –Davey2010Talk 17:42, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Honestly, the vast majority of the frame is just a wall. I don't see how it edifies anything about the venue or what educational value it would bring in attempting to depict the venue. czar 01:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- We know but as I said it's not being kept because of the wall, If the image has another purpose bar the main one (drawing) then the image is still in scope, There's still some education use for this image, Someone could very easily photoshop their own image on the wall (maybe as a project?), Who knows but imho there's still some scope/educational value left in this image. –Davey2010Talk 10:15, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
- Honestly, the vast majority of the frame is just a wall. I don't see how it edifies anything about the venue or what educational value it would bring in attempting to depict the venue. czar 01:47, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Sorry Davey2010 but the copyright poster was the intended subject. Without it there is not much that could be used educationally. --Green Giant (talk) 22:30, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Subi la foto por error. Apezarra (talk) 11:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 14:02, 22 April 2020 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Apezarra --Krdbot 18:32, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tyg728 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: 请求删除原因：上传错误版本，申请删除后重新上传 Yann (talk) 09:35, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
- 上传错误的版本，请求删除，删除后重新上传。--Tyg728 (talk) 11:20, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 13:13, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
上传错误的版本，请求删除，已重新上传File:Xieqiqu Ruins of Yuanmingyuan, Old Summer Palace, Peking, 1870's.jpg。 Tyg728 (talk) 08:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: They are saying they uploaded another version of the same file File:Xieqiqu Ruins of Yuanmingyuan, Old Summer Palace, Peking, 1870's.jpg. I did not inspect carefully but you might want to merge the 2 files. Thanks much. --Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 12:42, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
上传者请求删除原因：相同的图片File:Xieqiqu Ruins of Yuanmingyuan, Old Summer Palace, Peking, 1870's.jpg，重复上传，删除此版本 Tyg728 (talk) 07:37, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 08:07, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PlanespotterA320 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The first date of publication is unknown.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:36, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Maxinvestigator: Nuh-uh! Pravda September 1945, Moscow State University, and later 1950 obituary.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:08, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. --Vasyatka1 (talk) 18:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per PlanespotterA320. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:38, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PlanespotterA320 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Undeletion request won't work without DR. Also see User talk:JuTa/Archive 42#Undelete requests for future files.
- File:Female veterans at Moscow State University.jpg
- File:Test pilot Amet-Khan Sultan, 1960's.jpg
- File:Statue of Nurkhon Yuldasheva.jpg
- File:Amet-khan Sultan and his family.jpg
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Please delete these four, I nominated them myself! But next time use a different title for this page (ex, Files uploaded by PlanespotterA320 for later undeletion) to prevent writing on an old page.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- @PlanespotterA320: this happens all the time, this is just the default header VFC generates. There is no problem writing to an old page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: next time I'll create a regular deletion request instead of using a speedydelete template and putting with one for each image just so it is less messy, and ping on an admin to it gets deleted as soon as possible.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- @PlanespotterA320: this happens all the time, this is just the default header VFC generates. There is no problem writing to an old page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:02, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Please delete these four, I nominated them myself! But next time use a different title for this page (ex, Files uploaded by PlanespotterA320 for later undeletion) to prevent writing on an old page.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 22:54, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
@JuTa: Since you are an admin can you please delete these? Thanks.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 01:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- This is a regular deletion request which normaly lasts a week. Any admin can proccess it. --JuTa 03:34, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- @JuTa: this one can be speedied per Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#G7, I only created this DR so it could be categorized with the undeletion categories. (which, afaik, is needed for this kind of thing) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you think a speedy is requiired, then start a {{Speedy}} request, which can handle any admin too. --JuTa 07:04, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
- @JuTa: this one can be speedied per Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#G7, I only created this DR so it could be categorized with the undeletion categories. (which, afaik, is needed for this kind of thing) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied, per nomination by uploader. --Túrelio (talk) 14:40, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PlanespotterA320 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence of public domain provided. Some files have no verifiable sources at all, other have no indication of early enough publication (pre-1946) to be PD in US and Russia.
- File:Нина Распопова и Лариса Радчикова.jpg
- File:Lyubov Shevtsova, Young Guard.png
- File:Аршинцев, Борис Никитович.jpg
- File:Громова Ульяна Матвеевна (cropped).jpg
- File:Громова Ульяна Матвеевна.jpg
- File:Yekaterina Zelenko (cropped).jpg
- File:Ye. Nikulina.jpg
- File:Брандыс Анатолий Яковлевич.jpg
- File:Алексей Иванович Калабин.jpg
- File:Vasily Osipov 1945.jpg
- File:Иван Егорович Баранов.jpg
- File:Бадюк Михаил Михайлович.jpg
- File:Mariya Shcherbachenko pre-1943.png
- File:Tatyana Marinenko (cropped).jpg
- File:Татьяна Барамзина (cropped, grayscale).jpg
- File:Татьяна Барамзина.jpg
- File:Irina Rakobolskaya early 1940's.jpg
- File:Nikolai Tokarev.png
- File:Valentin Makarov 1944.png
- File:Valentin Makarov 1943.png
- File:Valentin Makarov.png
- File:Tatyana Makarova (cropped).jpg
- File:Antonina Zubkova photo (cropped).png
- File:Antonina Zubkova.png
- File:Мария Мельникайте.png
- File:Анна Лисицына.png
- File:Ксения Константинова.png
- File:Бабаджанян Амазасп.jpg
- File:Алиев Араз Казимагомедович.jpg
- File:Анджур Пюрбеевич Пюрбеев.jpg
- File:Алексей Иванович Седельников.jpg
- File:Irina Vyatscheslavovna Rakobolskaya.jpg
- File:Yevdokiya Nikulina.jpg
- File:Tatyana Makarova.jpg
- File:Nadezhda Popova portrait.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
VLu (talk) 12:00, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Already deleted by other admins. --Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Antoine Rohal died in 1978. No freedom of panorama in France. 86.249.245.173 14:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Antoine Rohal died in 1978. No freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 2.jpg
- File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 3.jpg
- File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 4.jpg
- File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 5.jpg
- File:Monument Déportés Château Thierry 6.jpg
Chassipress (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Antoine Rohal died in1978. No freedom of panorama in France. 86.249.245.173 14:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I see no reason why this image should be removed. I herewith certify that I am the author of the photograph (thus copyright owner,) taken on the same day as my other pictures shot at the same location and visible in the "Carrière des Fusillés" Wikimedia Commons category. Some of my pictures still contain the original Exif information. I modified some others, including this one with an editor that did not retain Exif, unlike what I have been doing more recently.
- You claim there is no freedom of panorama in France. This argument is neither sourced nor explained. I took my picture in a freely and publicly accessible memorial location, with no photographing prohibition displayed.--Michel Stermann - Paris (talk) 16:24, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- @Micsterm: Please read COM:FOP France Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:04, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Uploads by User:ウロジ
[edit]
Works by Japanese drawing artist Akira Sato (佐藤章, † 1985) [6]. Copyright is still in effect. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
No own work. Painting from Fritz Hildebrandt (1878–1970), so it is not PD. axel (talk) 15:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- File:Official Portrait Matthew Pennycook MP 2019.jpg
- File:Official Portrait Matthew Pennycook MP.jpg
Not in use, highly redundant to File:Official portrait of Matthew Pennycook MP crop 1.jpg and File:Official portrait of Matthew Pennycook MP.jpg (of which it is a crop). 2001:4BB8:254:202B:D1B3:B795:BC80:FE66 15:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. AlbanGeller (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samantajane (talk · contribs)
[edit]https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0134071/mediaindex?refine=publicity&ref_=nm_ov_resph
- File:Gennaro Cannavacciuolo sul set.jpg
- File:Gennaro Cannavacciuolo.jpg
- File:Gennaro cannavacciuolo.jpg
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvargues13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution photos without original exif - doubtful authorship.
- File:Rodrigo Maurício.jpg
- File:Rodrigo Maiurício.jpg
- File:O acordeão de José Ferreiro (Pai).jpg
- File:Plca J Ferreiro Pai.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Art-top (talk) 07:46, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Info There is no law to upload only perfect images. I have a sample of the image of «low resolution photos without original exif». This does not mean anything.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:53, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Delete For example, the second image has been copied from this film. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support Yes, the second image must be deleted then.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:41, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment If the author listed on that image was false, it is reasonable to doubt the authorship claims on the other images. --99of9 (talk) 01:16, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios. Yann (talk) 05:22, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jvargues13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and publications. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Homenagem a José Ferreiro (Pai) em 2002.jpg
- File:CD de Homenagem às Obras de José Ferreiro Pai & Filho.jpg
- File:José Ferreiro (Pai)-O Rei do Corridinho.jpg
- File:Registo de José Ferreiro no Brasil-em 1924.JPG
- File:Eugénia Lima.JPG
- File:José Ferreiro(Filho).JPG
- File:Jose ferreiro-(Pai).png
- File:King of the accordion.jpg
- File:José Ferreiro no Brasil.jpg
- File:Orquestra Típica Algarvia.JPG
- File:Orquestra Típica de Acordeão Algarvia.jpg
- File:José Ferreiro Júnior no Brasil.jpg
- File:José Ferreiro Júnior e José Marum.jpg
- File:José Ferreiro Jr..jpg
_em_2002.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-O_Rei_do_Corridinho.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:03, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:PS — Ирука13 17:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is outside the Commons:Project scope. This is a personal manifesto about trans people, created by the uploader, that was "uploaded for the purpose of...attack" (COM:SPAM) and is not "realistically useful for an educational purpose" (COM:NOTUSED). WanderingWanda (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
copyright violation, requires permission from the copyright holder of the map Verbcatcher (talk) 20:26, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Okay. I didn’t know that. My apologies. Timwi (talk) 13:21, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Likely copyvio. User has a history of uploading copyvios of the same subject and ignoring warnings. This may be simply a re-upload of a previously speedied image, but at any rate is from the same photo session as the images on this page:
https://www.diariodemexico.com/tony-dalton-la-mexicana
The photo credit on the page reads "especial", which presumably means the images were created to accompany this article, which is copyrighted by the Diario de México. The description "FOTO DE BOOK DE TONY DALTON" doesn’t make a great deal of sense, but anyway it doesn’t really jibe with the claim of "own work". The file should be deleted in accordance with the precautionary principle. —Rrburke (talk) 22:52, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete: No evidence of permission. --Kailash29792 (talk) 07:35, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The files are images of Royal Falkland Police, in which they are found in this official Facebook page of Royal Falkland Police dated 2018-06-28. As there are no existing free licenses for Falkland governmental works, these files should be deemed as copyrighted, thus they are likely to be copyrighted and unfree.
廣九直通車 (talk) 07:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:09, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
I cannot find the CC0 license on the source site; only © Copyright 2010-2015 АНО «За жизнь». Maybe a Russian speaking admin can check it. Thanks Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Already available translation at original file, no need to keep another file cuz SVG transaltion is possible. *angys* (talk) 08:40, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete.Sorry I didn't know that there is available translation. So I agree there is no need to keep it now. 34Unionist (talk) 12:14, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The author is Gunnar Widholm (1882-1953). Free in 2024. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 08:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:08, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The movie does not match the movie at the source so we cant verify the license. MGA73 (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep there are four movies at the source link, shown in a selection box under the video player: "Cancer", "Follow Your Bliss", "I <3 My Cat", and "Luv Is..." (this video). The direct link is https://archive.org/details/YeOldeAnimation/Luv Is....mov. clpo13(talk) 18:31, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep yes you are right. I changed the link and reviewed the file. --MGA73 (talk) 19:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 13:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep sufficient de minimis applies as the focus is on the overall structure and ceiling space, not individual posters. The screens are barely readable. --Fæ (talk) 08:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: not DM - the budweiser logos et al are clearly readable. --Gbawden (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Germannoiseunion (talk · contribs)
[edit]Songs. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Noise(Musik)-BendOverBarbie.ogg
- File:WikipediaCircuitBendingArticle-BendOverBarbie.ogg
- File:BendoverBarbie---Step1-Bending.ogg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Meditationlife (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos and sound recordings. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:THE ROAD OF AWE - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS.webm
- File:JUST START - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS.ogg
- File:CHECK YOYRSELF - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS.ogg
- File:THE WORLD IN FLAMES - ALEXIS KARPOUZOS.ogg
- File:Alexis Karpouzos 2.jpg
- File:Alexis Karpouzos.jpg
- File:Alexis karpouzos (Philosopher).jpg
- File:Alexis karpouzos (spiritual teacher).jpg
- File:Alexis karpouzos4.jpg
- File:Alexis karpouzos.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. --Ganímedes (talk) 12:53, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, my first concern is that this person does not appear to claim to be a musician. So where exactly did all this music come from? It might be (?) in scope if we're feeling generous and this person approaches notability or if these files are "good enough" as examples of "meditation stuff", however that is defined. I don't really know that much about "meditation stuff". My wife has a yoga room and I don't really go in there, but that's about as close as it gets. So the media files need to have basic copyright issues dealt with before we even consider scope issues.
- At least according to Q84557583, this person has no page on any project other than WD and Category:Alexis Karpouzos (spiritual teacher) which isn't really a category at all, and appears to instead be an attempt to make a Wikipedia article in category space. It looks an awful lot like an attempt to game WD in order to influence online search results, which is becoming more and more a thing these days. Leaning Delete barring further information. GMGtalk 12:48, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
COM:PRIV (cf. en:Draft:Abdul_Rauf_Chandio) Wutsje 17:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Its my own cover design, but the image used in the cover is not credited. So please delete for the moment we get the copyrights links Andrejs Volkovs (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
Files found with Photo: Peter Schlyter/Stockholm University
[edit]- File:Session pano 1 (10722528333).jpg
- File:Session pano 2 (10722332894).jpg
- File:Session pano 3 (10722338626).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These photos were taken from the US Embassy photostream but the images are credited to Peter Schlyter/Stockholm University. If they weren't taken by a State Dept official they can't be PD-USGov-DOS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbawden (talk • contribs) 2020-02-04T11:55:59 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
porque quiero y porque puedo 47.62.35.66 09:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Evidentemente es un acto de vandalismo. --Nanosanchez (talk) 22:44, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 15:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: изображение на фото и автор-одно и тоже лицо. Необходимо обращение в OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 18:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:05, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Фото из семейного архива, фотограф или правомерное обнародование неизвестны. Dogad75 (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Вручение ордена Ленина и Госпремии Васильеву А.Ф..jpg
- File:Туапсинский порт 1923 г..jpg
- File:Автобиография Васильева А.Ф..pdf
- File:Автобиография Васильева А.Ф,.pdf
- File:Свидетельство о рождении Васильева А.Ф..jpg
- File:За оборону Ленинграда Васильев А.Ф..jpg
- File:Студенческий билет и свидетельство о браке Васильева А.Ф..jpg
- File:Ордена и Премия Совмина.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
Av6746 - I hereby confirm that I am the author and owner of these photos. These are documents and photographs from the archive of my grandfather, who died in 1986. The archive was transferred to me and now I scaning the photos to create a grandfather page on Wikipedia. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Васильев,_Анатолий_Фёдорович_(гидротехник) These documents have never been published anywhere before. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Av6746 (talk • contribs) 19:40, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no photographers' permissions given. --Sealle (talk) 13:56, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Авторство и лицензии сомнительны: авторы и дата обнародование фотографий неизвестны, взяты из семейного архива https://www.flickr.com/photos/186642442@N04/albums/72157712831740422
- File:О. В.Василева (Сергеева) 7.11.1917 г..jpg
File:Василев А.Ф. 1917 г.jpg—
I withdraw my nomination, из переписки OTRS, на обороте фото указана дата июнь 1917 года, Ticket#2020012510004687. --Dogad75 (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)- File:Ольга Васильевна с детьми.jpg
- File:Васильев А.Ф. 1970 гг Хевоскоски ГЭС.jpg
- File:Васильев А.Ф. 1970 гг.jpg
- File:Фото Васильев А.Ф..jpg
_7.11.1917_%D0%B3..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dogad75 (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
This particular file has not been licensed under CCSA 4.0. The uploader also doesn't own the copyright to it. The file can be uploaded under a non-free fair use rationale because it is official cover of an EP by the record label Starboy Entertainment. Versace1608 (talk) 07:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Versace1608, how can the copyright be corrected and be changed to a 'non-free' copyrighted upload? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.210.71.10 (talk) 12:23, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:00, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Can use {{Insignia}}.--Thyj (talk) 04:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
- No. Country-specific license tag is needed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:47, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Unused local newspaper logo, it might be COM:OOS Frodar (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: above the threshold of originality in any case. --ƏXPLICIT 11:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Unused local newspaper logo, it might be COM:OOS Frodar (talk) 21:11, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: above the threshold of originality in any case. --ƏXPLICIT 11:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
Bad version of the logo Yzuriel (talk) 23:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: author request. --ƏXPLICIT 11:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
The subject claims to be the photographer here. It does not look like a selfie -- it looks like it was cropped from a photo of a group -- see both the boutonnière and the blonde hair to the left. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your concern. This is a picture taken of me and my daughter at my son's wedding. It was taken by my wife using my iPhone. I am the owner of this picture (Gregory Henderson.jpg).--Greghenderson2006 (talk) 16:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- The fact that the image was taken with your camera is irrelevant. The copyright is owned by the third party who actually took the photograph and only he or she can license it. In order for the image to be kept on Commons, the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. My wife took the photo and she will send the OTRS.--Greg Henderson 05:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greghenderson2006 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- The fact that the image was taken with your camera is irrelevant. The copyright is owned by the third party who actually took the photograph and only he or she can license it. In order for the image to be kept on Commons, the actual photographer must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Gregory_Henderson.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2020021010001312. --Hamish (talk) 05:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- I note that you originally claimed that the photo was taken by "a third party". After my comment of 19:55, 9 February 2020, you changed that to say "It was taken by my wife using my iPhone." Given both your record of claiming "own work" on images where that was not true and the fact that I doubt very much that you would refer to your wife as "a third party", I strongly suspect that some other person actually took the image. Note that our standard of proof is "beyond a significant doubt" and I don't think you have met that here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- I understand that you are just trying to do your job and I appreciate that. However, in this case, it was my son's wedding and to the best of my knowledge, my wife is the third party that took the picture. I think this is a very edge case and that a picture of me taken on my phone from my wife should be allowed. --Greg Henderson 20:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greghenderson2006 (talk • contribs) 20:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: still no OTRS confirmation. --JuTa 17:16, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Low quality maps with wrong Chinese name *angys* (talk) 10:22, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:40, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Source: internet — Ирука13 17:16, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- image more than 75 years old, not copyrighted
- COM:L — Ирука13 17:33, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 19:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2016-07-07 15-41-51 ILCE-6300 DSC02893 (27671631313).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-41-57 ILCE-6300 DSC02895 (28208764491).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-42-53 ILCE-6300 2904 DxO (29712034425).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-42-53 ILCE-6300 DSC02904 (27671309464).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-25 ILCE-6300 DSC02920 (28183360302).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-30 ILCE-6300 DSC02922 (28183370872).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep:
File:2016-07-07 15-41-51 ILCE-6300 DSC02893 (27671631313).jpgFile:2016-07-07 15-41-57 ILCE-6300 DSC02895 (28208764491).jpg- File:2016-07-07 15-44-25 ILCE-6300 DSC02920 (28183360302).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-30 ILCE-6300 DSC02922 (28183370872).jpg
- as these have been blurred out,
- Delete the other 2 as non-savable. –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- People browsing through these may want to know what the building sort of looked like..... The blurred images still have some scope and value to them, You nominated these due to characters being present however I have obviously resolved that so at this point there's currently no valid reason to delete them. –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, waste of time blurring them, no use now.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've struck 2 images since both of those sort of have the same view in other images, The 2 remaining images don't have that area in it and so for that reason imho those 2 should be kept,
- These images IMHO still have some value to them and regardless of usage readers will want to know what the building inside looks like and the area in both images hasn't been taken in any other images in the main category. –Davey2010Talk 15:02, 13 February 2020
- One image is currently not blurred due to WMF constantly bringing up server errors, Until the WMF get that fixed unfortunately for the time being the image will have to remain unblurred as there's no possible way new versions can be uploaded, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]- File:2016-07-08 10-08-21 ILCE-6300 DSC03667 (27674992474).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 10-08-27 ILCE-6300 DSC03668 (28187139292).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 11-46-09 ILCE-6300 DSC04171 (27677750624).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. –Davey2010Talk 11:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2016-07-08 09-52-55 ILCE-6300 DSC03628 (28186902252).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 09-52-56 ILCE-6300 DSC03629 (28186909032).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails DW and Out of scope anyway. (Not that it needs reiterating but these were all uploaded as part of an album and limitations at Flickr2Commons meant they all had to be uploaded IE couldn't pick and choose). –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The caption does not correspond with the diagram. Newtonian motion also explained the perihelion precession, but the problem was that it measured a slightly lower value than observed, while Einstein's theory predicted the real value. 31.205.251.204 22:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Can we rename it to 'orbital precession' then? Nerd271 (talk) 23:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Do not delete a picture file (which are hard to come by) just because the caption needs to be reworded. Especially since it is used in the important article on General Relativity. JRSpriggs (talk) 01:53, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: if it is something wrong with it, it should be improved rather than deleted. Tgeorgescu (talk) 06:51, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: nothing wrong with the picture. Simple and, for the context, sufficiently accurate illustration of precession. In absence of other planets, there is no Newtonian precession. - 81.83.25.83 13:26, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Note: I clarfied the caption in the General relativity article. - 81.83.25.83 13:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with everyone who voted above. An anonymous editor clarified the caption on the page 'general relativity'. It should be fine. Nerd271 (talk) 03:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Very surprised that this has even been nominated. Things like this should be improved, not deleted. Agree with the other comments, that it serves a valid illustrative purpose. DWeir (talk) 21:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
Keep - No valid reason to delete Gbawden (talk) 13:49, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:08, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This video has a number of copyrighted items within it. Google, Twitter etc to name a few. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:30, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
No indication that it was released under that license at the time, unfortunately. The earliest archive available of the copyright notice is in feb 2016 ([7]) and state that content may not be reused without written permission. Vermont (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep We need good evidence to delete a file hosted here for 13 years. The licensereview template was added on 8 February 2020 by UCinternational for arbitrary reasons. The uploader contributed to this project for 7 years acting in good faith throughout. There is no reason to doubt their direct quoted cut&paste release statement from the source website.
- This would be different were there reasons to suspect license laundering, or if the photographer was raising a complaint that challenged the upload statement given. Consequently falls below the significant doubt needed per precautionary principle. --Fæ (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Uplaoded past the community-agreed cut-off date for Commons:Grandfathered old files. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:19, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
- @Vermont: Oh what a terribly designed early-2000s website. But I found the archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20070415230955/http://www.orenstransitpage.com/orenstransitpage/grndctrl.htm. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 15:17, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
I doubt very much that this document was actually published at any time. Such corporate agreements rarely are published. It almost certainly was stored in a corporate archive, out of sight. I also wonder whether it is within the scope of Commons. Also, the HAGLEY DIGITAL ARCHIVES is certainly not the author. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- User:Jameslwoodward, I changed author to McConnell and Henderson; added Category:Organizational documents; It is an important document that shows the partnership between McConnell and Henderson when the company, now Avon, was just becoming a corporation. --Greghenderson2006 (talk) 16:47, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my unease about whether the document is in scope, but it remains to be proven that it was actually published until recently. Very few corporate documents of this kind are ever published. If its first publication was upon being uploaded here, then it will be under copyright until January 1, 2030 -- 120 years after creation. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- On page 2 of this document, Avon moved this document to their archieve in 1921. This document was a legal agreement of Corporation for the California Perfume Company in the state of New Jersey between McConnell and Henderson; it represents the bill of sale for $220,000.00. It was signed by Henderson and attested by Secretary William Scheele in June 16, 1909. Perhaps it would be better to use the license: PD-US-unpublished. --Greghenderson2006 (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- It is a work made for hire -- any document written be a lawyer or lawyers is. In order for a work made for hire to qualify for {{PD-US-unpublished}}, it must have been created before 1900. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me)
- On page 2 of this document, Avon moved this document to their archieve in 1921. This document was a legal agreement of Corporation for the California Perfume Company in the state of New Jersey between McConnell and Henderson; it represents the bill of sale for $220,000.00. It was signed by Henderson and attested by Secretary William Scheele in June 16, 1909. Perhaps it would be better to use the license: PD-US-unpublished. --Greghenderson2006 (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- I withdraw my unease about whether the document is in scope, but it remains to be proven that it was actually published until recently. Very few corporate documents of this kind are ever published. If its first publication was upon being uploaded here, then it will be under copyright until January 1, 2030 -- 120 years after creation. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:53, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I'll go back to using the licnese PD-US-expired.--Greg Henderson 17:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greghenderson2006 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Just got the release for this PDF from Hagley Museum and Library. Updated permission section. Below is the release: Hi Greg, Thanks for getting in touch. The Agreement of Corporation for the California Perfume Company isn't in copyright so you're welcome to use Hagley's image of it in the Wikipedia article. Best, Angela Schad Reference Archivist and Digital Archives Specialist Hagley Museum and Library.--Greg Henderson 21:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greghenderson2006 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep If discernible copies of the text were distributed before 1962 then it is out of copyright. That is the thing with legal documents, multiple copies are distributed to multiple parties. If this is standard boilerplate legalese it may not be eligible for copyright. To be eligible for a copyright it must meet the threshold of creativity, picking and choosing boilerplate paragraphs and listing assets, does not meet that threshold. The first person to come up with the standard clause for the force majeure paragraph, was eligible to copyright that text. Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: looks OK to me. --JuTa 15:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Bild (ein alter Innenraum) und die Dateibezeichnung )Einfahrt) stimmen nicht überein. Beim Hochladen passierte mir das, weiss nicht wieso. Werde also nochmals mit anderer Dateibezeichnung hochladen. Der File >Thurnhof-Gemeinde-Perg-Einfahrt-vonSüden.jpg< sollte also gelöscht werden, Mfg TREM-RRRR. 7.2.2020 TREM-RRRR (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TREM-RRRR: Can this file be moved to a different title, or does it need to be deleted? --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --JuTa 15:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
