Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/09/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 20th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Syamuと丸山.jpg おほ^~ツク海 (talk) 08:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Finnusertop as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image:Boris_I_of_Bulgaria.jpg deleted as no source Should be a proper DR. I wonder if the deletion of the source image is really proper. Yann (talk) 13:02, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nach Schreibfehler Datei geleert --Dguendel 06:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: Empty, bad name, author's request. --Achim (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Republish with corrrect License JeanDeLaMouche (talk) 23:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied as copyvio and per uploader's request.  JGHowes  talk 02:46, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crosswiki spam, blocked on DE Nolispanmo 12:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly out of scope. --JuTa 07:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crosswiki spam, blocked on DE Nolispanmo 12:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly out of scope. --JuTa 07:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crosswiki spam, blocked on DE Nolispanmo 12:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly out of scope. --JuTa 07:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crosswiki spam, blocked on DE Nolispanmo 12:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly out of scope. --JuTa 07:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

crosswiki spam, blocked on DE Nolispanmo 12:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly out of scope. --JuTa 07:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{duplicate}} Mkolewis (talk) 14:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Duplicate from File:Thorstrand Aerial NW 1948.jpg - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 15:43, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: dupe-processed, but the other way round. --Túrelio (talk) 20:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used,same as File:Ronco logo.svg on English Wikipedia, and low resolution 104.194.218.5 22:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same as File:Ronco logo.svg on English Wikipedia, not used, lower resolution 173.239.197.2 16:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, this is textlogo, ineligible for copyright. In addition, local copy in en.wiki does not replace file in commons. Taivo (talk) 19:44, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used, same as Ronco logo.svg on en:wiki 2605:B100:D0D:9C5E:F175:32C3:973F:C577 15:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 104.194.218.5 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Not used, same as Ronco logo.svg on en:wiki|subpage=File:Ronco Always Innovating logo.png|year=2019|month=November|day=3. Invalid speedy deletion criterium. Previously kept. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no new arguments. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:28, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fails COM:EDUSE. The image adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of BW images we already hold covering the same subject. Inappropriate use of Wikimedia as a web host for Nazi fancruft. The uploader of the colorourised version is "Ruffneck88" which is an obvious neo-Nazi dog whistle, with "88" being understood as "HH" (Heil Hitler) in far-right circles. For a comparative deletion discussion, please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R98683, Reinhard Heydrich Recolored.jpg. No educational value to the project as Wiki Commons already holds an authentic B&W photo from Germany's Bundesarchiv. K.e.coffman (talk) 14:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 07:05, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

text of unclear copyright statut it is likely out of scope as it is a text only image. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, the file is used, that means in scope. The text is written in 1910, so it is likely in public domain due to age (Venezuela demands 60 years from death). Anyway, it is official symbol of Venezuelan state and so in PD. I'll fix the license. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found everywhere like http://www.metrolyrics.com/ninja-sex-party-overview.html, permission needed. IagoQnsi (talk) 00:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep. This file was uploaded to Commons in 2012, six years ago. The uploader, w:User:Bwecht, first started writing an article about Ninja Sex Party in February 2010, when the band was still fairly obscure. If you can find evidence that this photo was uploaded somewhere else before it was uploaded here, then we can talk about whether or not Bwecht is the real Brian Wecht, but otherwise I see no reason to doubt it. The MetroLyrics link you provided says that its images are sourced from Last.fm; I found the image on Last.fm, and it says that it was uploaded on 28 Mar 2014 -- two years after it was uploaded here. --IagoQnsi (talk) 00:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. As stated above. It's likely that all those websites used this image because as their wikipedia picture it was one of the easiest to find on the internet.--Hyliad (d), September 20, 2018, 11:58 (CEST)

Kept: per discussion. --Sealle (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image SecretName101 (talk) 00:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen at 10:06, 27 September 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Kylie Minogue at Bowery Ballroom (June 25, 2018) --Krdbot 13:02, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VDJDinamik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine and no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dadacucu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-res photos, the only uploader's contributions, no EXIF, unlikely to be own work.

Sealle (talk) 05:23, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the German Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted from October 2015 to March 2018 as non-notable. Out of project scope. xplicit 05:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent use on any project since being uploaded in November 2017. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. xplicit 05:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamredaa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in May 2016 as non-notable. Out of project scope.

xplicit 05:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from internet (seen from the watermark shown); no permission given from the original author. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 06:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 06:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: On scope for Sanga Grande.-- Darwin Ahoy! 00:54, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ravi140398 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jen Lus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 10:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 10:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 11:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:28, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Could be wikitext if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not sure about promo, but all of these are copyright violations (metadata and so on). --Sealle (talk) 13:07, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JYOTISHMEHTA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and created by children of the embassy employees

Tyler de Noche (talk) 14:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And likely copyrighted cause the children are not US employees. --JuTa 07:46, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:31, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Rliant1864 (talk) 00:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:40, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this picture, uploaded by me, is not properly licensed. I thought it was at first, but now I'm not sure. José Luiz disc 00:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Lord Leighton has been dead for more than 100 years. {PD-Old-100} Abzeronow (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I thought so at first and that's why I uploaded the image, but the EXIF information claims a copyright. Is that invalid? José Luiz disc 19:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, the National Gallery is claiming copyright on the digitized copy of the painting, which itself is unquestionably public domain. COM:PDARTREUSE says the UK is "inconclusive" as far as whether the digitized copy can have its own copyright. Art Museums tend to claim copyright on public domain works anyway to secure licensing fees, and they even do so in the United States when a faithful reproduction clearly doesn't get its own copyright. Abzeronow (talk) 16:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Architect dead for 100 years; no copyright on a scanned copy of a painting. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 12:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:40, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This logo consists of more than simple geometric figures and text. Editor abcdef (talk) 01:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment agree to the above. Here is the source [1] also on Wikipedia at [2]--DBigXray 11:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Complex shapes. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:40, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be own work; picture of a historical picture. Catrìona (talk) 01:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There's a sign for an OTRS ticket, so it is reasonable the file has been released properly. Ldorfman (talk) 00:07, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: permission/author checked through OTRS. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from www.frankmelbourne.com Hltbrg (talk) 01:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's redundant and poor quality. Poor quality: weird angle, dusty, unfocused, distinctly amateurish. Redundant: There are better photos of the Kinect, this isn't a unique photo or representative. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 02:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: there are not a lot of pictures of a kinect on top of a television. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate uploaded by mistake. Original at: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Igreja_Matriz_de_Nossa_Senhora_de_Nazaré_9153.jpg Prburley (talk) 03:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary; there is another one: File:Vraagcurve totaal4.png JopkeB (talk) 03:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary; there is a better one: File:Vraagcurve totaal4.png JopkeB (talk) 03:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary; there is a better one: File:Vraagcurve totaal4.png JopkeB (talk) 03:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary; there is a better one: File:Vraagcurve totaal4.png JopkeB (talk) 03:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary; there is a better one: File:Inelastische vraagcurve1.png JopkeB (talk) 03:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary; there is a better one: File:Elastische vraagcurve2.png JopkeB (talk) 03:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-encyclopedic: (Self-)Promotional material Andycyca (talk) 04:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non-free, promotional picture. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request: This page is useless. Please remove it. Thank you. -MatthewAnderson707 (talk) 04:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not used, seems a corrupted file. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All these files seem to be newspapers and ads. Unclear if they are 100% in the public domain.

Tyler ser Noche (talk) 16:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seem to be out of scope

Tyler ser Noche (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a lot of use, if any, and out of scope.

Tyler ser Noche (talk) 16:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:33, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Whisky en las rocas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, personal picture(s), out of Project Scope.

Amitie 10g (talk) 22:57, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:22, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Whisky en las rocas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project sopes, more or less self promotion

Pippobuono (talk) 18:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirsalehiii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Hardly own work, promotional

Pippobuono (talk) 20:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashwath Narayana b s (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SELFIE, non-notable subject not active on any project.

GMGtalk 14:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flj123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused QR-code

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS should be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All revisions derived from either File:Dag Hammarskjold.jpg or its derivative File:Dag Hammarskjöld cropped.JPG. Both were deleted as non-free because of [3]. Finnusertop (talk) 21:45, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted album cover —Andrei S. Talk 07:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no fair use on Commons. --Achim (talk) 11:22, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 10:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, full resolution shows unbearably bad quality. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 10:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, that's true. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 10:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, borderline case, but as depicted place isn't identified, I decided to delete. Taivo (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 10:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:56, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 10:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:56, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine and no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Also unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 05:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:27, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

è di mia proprietà e non desidero più condividerlo. Cristiano.piva (talk) 13:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

è di mia proprietà e non desidero più condividerlo. 37.160.102.145 12:09, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: NETCOPYVIO in any case. Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I just uploaded a higher resolution file of this exact image and failed to replace this image Gillfoto 19:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

@Gillfoto: Please link the replacing file! If the file is exact the same you should tag it with {{Duplicate}} instead of a DR. -- User: Perhelion 10:38, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as File:Mass with Ickx ed04.jpg is strong photoshoped. -- User: Perhelion 10:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong diagram. This page should be a file redirect. hueman1 (talk) 11:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This diagram is wrong, and should be redirected to the correct file. hueman1 (talk) 08:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect: to File:Asian Highway 26 PH sign.svg (), the correct file.

Kept: in use. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:29, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright status is not shown on source webpage and therefore seems unverifiable. GeoWriter (talk) 10:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Strakhov (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From non-free paper: [4] 2001:569:782B:7A00:210E:12FE:C7D4:7C1A 06:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Content from open access articles in Phytotaxa is licensed as Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported; see http://www.mapress.com/j/pt/pages/view/forauthors. Image use hence is fine. --Elmidae (talk) 09:39, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1. The license is given at the bottom of the first page of the PDF as CC BY 3.0... --Gretarsson (talk) 12:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-made artwork without obvious educational use. Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture of an Israeli executive. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 07:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There isn't a "Spanglish flag." This is a plain invention of its author, which doesn't even consider the fact that most Spanglish is spoken in America and not Europe (as suggested by the mix of European Spanish and British symbols) Totally inexistent. MaeseLeon (talk) 09:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:45, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence uploader is the copyright holder. Jespinos (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 02:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work - small/middle size witout EXIFs - prior catches with google Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:48, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from facebook "FBMD", no evidence of permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the photo is a derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate. Ketil3 (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, original uploader's request T.Bednarz (talk) 20:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo, personality and potentially copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:50, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yang yu xin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:51, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:31, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 23:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 23:36, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 23:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:52, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:53, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged as {{PD-BrazilGov}}, which requires both being "published or commissioned by a Brazilian government (federal, state, or municipal)" and it being done so "prior to 1983" or it being "text of a treaty, convention, law, decree, regulation, judicial decision, or other official enactment". As logos, they do not fall under the latter. According to the Portuguese Wikipedia, this unit was established in 1993, so the license can not possibly apply. This logo is likely copyrighted. xplicit 23:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader's request. This file is not used anywhere outside of Commons. It is one of 12 photos of the same person from the same ceremony, so nothing is lost. There are more pictures in c:Category:Nahal Ghanbari with her in the same situation holding the same object.File:Fantastika 2018 92.jpg is used in an article, so that is the image that is likely to be used elsewhere. This shouldn't have been uploaded, and it would be very helpful for me to be able to upload images to Commons in the future if it could be deleted. Julle (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:31, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want to have ir online. Jpc2310 (talk) 16:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (courtesy deletion). --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too much camera shake to be of any use Malcolma (talk) 17:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:35, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is widely used on facebook and twitter at least since 2018-08-30. It is believed, in such cases we need an OTSR-Ticket or the image needs to be deleted. Smial (talk) 18:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Uploader seems to be the photographer himself. See also Edit history in german WP with edit summary there for details where the picture was taken. --Migebert (talk) 08:39, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Migebert. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:32, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a scribbled version of the original logo File:THS Logo 2.png. un-encyclopaedic image with no expected usage. --DBigXray 20:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:12, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF data, highly edited … looks like the stereotypical "I found this on Google" image. Based on the highlights and shadows, it's most likely derived from this image. El Grafo (talk) 13:22, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Strakhov (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://www.pinterest.fr/ruizbraulio190/mens-runway/?lp=true, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Of course is a crop from a screenshot copyrighted. Delete please. --Phyrexian ɸ 01:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the requests was about another file. But is seem this one too is not own work, so delete it please. --Phyrexian ɸ 01:38, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juzzywuzzy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused logos with questionable notability, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo with questionable notability, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo with questionable notability, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, and/or potentially personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 22:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:28, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it appears at medium.com: https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*NXVGJ84hXYruW_LYPETlzA.jpeg , and is not the uploader's work, copyright infringement Twopower332.1938 (talk) 23:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:23, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission and certainly not simple shapes! Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 06:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent use on any project since being uploaded in June 2013. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. xplicit 12:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The site does not seem to provide their contents (is this one theirs?) under a free license Discasto talk 13:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I've used this picture of Jean-Luc Nancy for a guest lecture at my university. We sent him a preview of the poster, to which he replied "Non pitié pas cette image que je déteste et qui traîne partout...." - so maybe it would be a good idea to remove it from wikicommons? :) Aventurijn (talk) 13:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . --Didym (talk) 15:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a professional studio image used for advertising the device e.g. here or here. They're probably all derived from the product shot at the manufacturer's website: [5] (direct link). Shadows and reflections are the same; the obvious give-away is the white particle of dirt near the lower right corner of the black rectangle (see image note). El Grafo (talk) 13:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found some similar one, possible copyvio B dash (talk) 13:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:55, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zu klein, ersetzt durch File:Louis-Roland Trinquesse Portrait de l'architecte L. N. Percenet agrandi.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 14:21, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hochlader offensichtlich nicht identisch mit Urheber / Rechteinhaber Lutheraner (talk) 14:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hochlader und Rechteinhaber sind identisch Mci-germany 21:04, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Hochlader offensichtlich nicht Urheber, weiteres per OTRS. --Didym (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce fichier devrait être placé dans Belvoir (Doubs) Espirat (talk) 14:51, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable source claim. Tineye search [6] shows lankasri.com with the same image with a crawl date before this image was uploaded. The page include this image with and without a watermark. Not totally sure on this one, but there's so many copyvio's around Indian actors and actressess that I thought I'd be safe. Ravensfire (talk) 18:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not the user's own work, it was clearly extracted from the internet. Stalin990 (talk) 18:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia is not a family album to be uploading images that have nothing to do with encyclopedic content. Stalin990 (talk) 18:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:49, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload. Poor quality. Please delete it. Ketil3 (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because of the above points, clarification is needed as to license and permission, see COM:L. -- Ariadacapo (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personality and potentially copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 20:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. No authorship information (e.g. no date), unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:43, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small-sized unused upload, potentially personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 21:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:42, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name of the image is not neutral and does not match the characteristics of Wikipedia. The image does not seem to be the author's own work either. Stalin990 (talk) 18:42, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. — Racconish💬 16:37, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image does not have encyclopedic purposes either, nor does it have a neutral name. Stalin990 (talk) 18:43, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. — Racconish💬 16:38, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was accidentally uploaded. It has no particular significance for the Mille Miglia 2012 documentation. Please delete it. Ketil3 (talk) 19:12, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - uploader's reques same day as upload, unused. — Racconish💬 16:44, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload. We have enough Ferrari 360 pictures. Please delete it. Ketil3 (talk) 19:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - uploader's request same day as upload, unused. — Racconish💬 16:43, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload. These are not participants in the race. Please delete it. Ketil3 (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - uploader's request same day as upload, unused. — Racconish💬 16:42, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 23:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. — Racconish💬 16:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

more information Danielhsc (talk) 21:17, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed copyright status seems unverifiable. No evidence that the claimed CC-BY-SA licence is correct - because the image was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from a Panoramio-clone website after copyright details became uncheckable on Panoramio because of the closure of the Panoramio website (copyright details were only on Panoramio not on the Panoramio-clone source website. GeoWriter (talk) 10:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was uploaded as own work and with a Creative Commons license (default settings for a crosswiki upload), but the description says "Courtesy of the National Hellenic Museum, Chicago." Needs proof that the image is licensed properly. kyykaarme (talk) 08:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kyykaarme,

The National Hellenic Museum, unlike other museums/libraries, has begun to digitize, and produce online all their archived documents. This includes the archives on the Doundoulakis brothers. It is in the process of being digitized and placed in online view without copyright infringements. Regards, Bigeez (talk) 01:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bigeez: Are u an employee of the museum? Can u provide us who decided to put the archived pics under a free license? Because then we need to veryfie that with a mail to our com:OTRS Team.--Sanandros (talk) 06:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, no problem will do what is requested. No, I am not an employee; I am an archivist/genealogist. Please allow 72 hrs to do this with the NHM (National Hellenic Museum).Bigeez (talk) 23:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just thought archivists are sometimes empoyed by musemsus ;) .--Sanandros (talk) 05:07, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bigeez: It seems that you upload [7] images by adding them to Wikipedia articles, and the Wikipedia system then brings them here with its default settings. It might be better in the future to use the UploadWizard instead, because it gives you more options. You have uploaded all images as your "own work" (the default setting), which would mean that you took those photographs yourself. And all the images have Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license, which means that anyone can use those images for any purpose, also commercially. We need to know that the copyright owner has indeed released the images with that license. Maybe the museum thinks they can "donate" images to only Wikipedia use, but that's not possible. -kyykaarme (talk) 09:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sure about copyright tag: militar base was built in the 50s and nothing is left now. Picture was certainly not taken in 2013 (Well, not the original at least)... Original picture might have been a photo taken by US government worker (as it was a US base) but I do not think we know that for sure right now... 159.237.12.32 11:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination- the owner of the flickr account is unlikely to be the copyright holder. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Si trova nella sezione sbagliata, cioè Cimitero Maggiore invece che Castello Visconteo. Lordraffy (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Si trova nella sezione sbagliata, cioè Cimitero Maggiore invece che Castello Visconteo. Lordraffy (talk) 12:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The wrong information perhaps Teerinkncd1 (talk) 12:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unless it's taken from a law or similar document, it's not in the public domain Discasto talk 12:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Finnusertop as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derived from copyvio File:Лідер Російської комуністичної партії (більшовиків), 1918.png Should be a proper DR. Yann (talk) 12:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is one that relates to the deleted file: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Pyotr Otsup. -- Deadstar (msg) 17:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not good Musthafa.ak (talk) 13:25, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok - uploader request. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Mkolewis (talk) 14:20, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no duplicates. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate Mkolewis (talk) 14:24, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the other file is smaller, and have a different processing. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was erroneously tagged as public domain, with credit to the search engine Baidu. However, search engines do not have copyright on images found using their technology. I tagged the file PD-China, seemingly also in error. I assumed the photograph was taken in 1949, shortly after the depicted people married, but 1949 50 is 1999, three years after the URAA took place in the PRC. Vycl1994 (talk) 15:05, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality JPEG version with compression artifacts of simple text logo. Replaced with SVG version in all uses. Techtri (talk) 16:33, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a duplicate. Delete this one and keep the duplicate (in the Rodeo Drive category). Ketil3 (talk) 17:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name of the image is not neutral and does not match the characteristics of Wikipedia. Stalin990 (talk) 18:40, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to suggest that the PNP has released their image under the license asserted.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  18:46, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image also has no encyclopedic purposes and is in a category that has nothing to do with the image. Stalin990 (talk) 18:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:05, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have an almost identical picture. Please delete this one. Ketil3 (talk) 19:08, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Question When filing such deletion requests, it would be very helpful to link to the "almost identical picture", so we don't have to search for it... Gestumblindi (talk) 21:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Gestumblindi, I don't see the identical image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally nominated at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Hornet Driver. Split into indivudal DR for independent discussion, if applicable. FastilyClone (talk) 04:50, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: This is a perfectly good photo, well in scope. The only reason to delete it was a serious concern to assume bad faith from the uploader, based on the notion that the disparity of cameras and scanners reported in the EXIF data of his/her uploads implies copyright violation of third parties. That kind of concern cannot be evaluated in separate, isolated DRs such as this one, and indeed, upon exemplary (if seldom) questioning, the uploader proven to satisfaction personal authorship of most (if not all) uploads. No concievable reason to even file a separate DR for this one. -- Tuválkin 22:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn -FastilyClone (talk) 03:58, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Had been published in 2010 https://www.rts.ch/info/sciences-tech/2295405-un-avion-franchit-le-mur-du-son-en-valais.html copyvio Anidaat (talk) 19:27, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - see also https://www.rts.ch/2013/01/23/16/54/2295413.image?w=2000&h=1327. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not part of the Mille Miglia program. Please delete Ketil3 (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion- don't understand the rationale - as per the EXIFs it was taken the same day at the same time - some other image are taken from the same point of view. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permisson and invalid license 1978 50 = 2028 Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:53, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 15:29, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permisson and invalid license ... 1976 50=2026 Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 15:30, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logotype is considered as a copyright protected material under Mexican laws. ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 22:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 04:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Tbhotch as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Escudo de Tigres 2016.jpg Yann (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 240D:1A:F4:1600:FD15:1DA5:EAFF:209B as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: Scan copy of copyrighted book. This looks like PD-ineligible to me. Yann (talk) 12:57, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:36, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Webaugust (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work, probably a scanned paper photograph of unclear copyright status.

Sealle (talk) 07:14, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo was provided to me nearly 20 years ago by widow of Dr. Levitin. If there any copyright violations feel free to delete it. Webaugust (talk) 13:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I refuse the old version uploaded by Watchduck.
  Arthur Baelde (talk) 12:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Arthur Baelde is trying to force his way around following the rules. First by overwriting, now by deleting and reuploading. See this discussion for context. Watchduck (quack) 12:47, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since January 2010, you are the only one who dared to overwrite a new version of an image I created. I hope this page will disappear, because such an attack on an  author appears on the file history, setting a precedent. The following marks of disrespect are analoguous:
  1. File:Academ_Two_stellations_of_a_Platonic_dodecahedron.svg   September 2018
  2. File:Icosidodecahedron_and_dual_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
  3. File:Icosidodecahedron_as_intersection_of_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
  4. File:Icosidodecahedron_from_dual_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
      Arthur Baelde (talk) 09:59, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I refuse the old version uploaded by Watchduck.
  Arthur Baelde (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Arthur Baelde is trying to force his way around following the rules. First by overwriting, now by deleting and reuploading. See this discussion for context. Watchduck (quack) 12:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since January 2010, you are the only one who dared to overwrite a new version of an image I created. I hope this page will disappear, because such an attack on an  author appears on the file history, setting a precedent. The following marks of disrespect are analoguous:
  1. File:Academ_Two_stellations_of_a_Platonic_dodecahedron.svg   September 2018
  2. File:Dual_Platonic_solids_and_icosidodecahedron.svg   September 2018
  3. File:Icosidodecahedron_as_intersection_of_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
  4. File:Icosidodecahedron_from_dual_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
      Arthur Baelde (talk) 10:03, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I refuse the old version uploaded by Watchduck.
  Arthur Baelde (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Arthur Baelde is trying to force his way around following the rules. First by overwriting, now by deleting and reuploading. See this discussion for context. Watchduck (quack) 12:48, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since January 2010, you are the only one who dared to overwrite a new version of an image I created. I hope this page will disappear, because such an attack on an  author appears on the file history, setting a precedent. The following marks of disrespect are analoguous:
  1. File:Academ_Two_stellations_of_a_Platonic_dodecahedron.svg   September 2018
  2. File:Dual_Platonic_solids_and_icosidodecahedron.svg   September 2018
  3. File:Icosidodecahedron_and_dual_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
  4. File:Icosidodecahedron_from_dual_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
      Arthur Baelde (talk) 10:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Denmark. FunkMonk (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have no opinion on that as such as I only barely understand the "FOP concept". However, I can provide additional facts. This picture was taken
-from an outdoor exhibition
-The exhibition was on display in Ålborg (Ålborg Zoo), Denmark, in 2016 - access only by admission (as it was inside the Zoo)
-and later in Århus (Museum of Natural History), Denmark, in 2017 - no admission (it was in a public accesible area)
Hope it may clear up things. --Honymand (talk) 12:37, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:34, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I refuse the old version uploaded by Watchduck.
  Arthur Baelde (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Arthur Baelde is trying to force his way around following the rules. First by overwriting, now by deleting and reuploading. See this discussion for context. Watchduck (quack) 12:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Since January 2010, you are the only one who dared to overwrite a new version of an image I created. I hope this page will disappear, because such an attack on an  author appears on the file history, setting a precedent. The following marks of disrespect are analoguous:
  1. File:Academ_Two_stellations_of_a_Platonic_dodecahedron.svg   September 2018
  2. File:Dual_Platonic_solids_and_icosidodecahedron.svg   September 2018
  3. File:Icosidodecahedron_and_dual_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
  4. File:Icosidodecahedron_as_intersection_of_Platonic_solids.svg   September 2018
      Arthur Baelde (talk) 10:08, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:35, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Movim-logo.svg which is more used. Cypouz (talk) 12:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Movim-logo.svg which is more used. Cypouz (talk) 12:44, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, go for it! I uploaded this one because Movim-logo.svg had a very different layout, but it turned out to be the previous version of the logo. Link Mauve (talk) 17:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded on enwiki with an OTRS permission statement that apparently does not confirm permission. Pinging BU Rob13 who handled the OTRS statement there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:13, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - ticket 2018090810003791 never approved. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opionions are asked : potentially personality right or/and copyright issues, unused file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 19:58, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:42, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement (author of this page is not the author of the logo). Walter Klosse (talk) 20:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement (author of this page is not the author of the picture). Walter Klosse (talk) 20:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:43, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image, EXIF at Flickr states 2008-2018, Copyright, Amirmasoud Agharebparast, All Rights Reserved. Seems COM:LL. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't COM:LL, but I can see how it is suspicious. I'm in contact with the subject of the photo, who is in contact with the photographer, and who requested he upload it under a Wikipedia-compatible license. I am familiar with licensing practices and with wiki policies but I don't know the best way to proceed on demonstrating licensing status. Any suggestions? ParkerHiggins (talk) 22:52, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - All Rights Reserved not in Flickr image any more. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:46, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, potentially personality and/or copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 21:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. I could not track this back to a government website. Jcb (talk) 21:15, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo showing an identifiable individual, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, oubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:00, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment From what I understand, this is digital art, not a real person, so the reasoning is partly wrong. I've not an opinion relating to scope (could it be interesting to illustrate something with people and fire?)-- Darwin Ahoy! 22:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is digital art, but it looks like it's based around a photograph of a real person. I don't think there are any personality rights issues that we need to care about, though, since the subject was clearly aware he was being photographed. However, there may be copyright issues with the background, which doesn't match the style of the rest of the piece and looks like art from a video game. The image does have the potential to illustrate the topic of digital art, but since we already have hundreds of images in Category:Digital art and its subcategories, I don't see any pressing need to keep this one. clpo13(talk) 22:28, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"However, there may be copyright issues with the background"
I can create the same background in less then 5 min, this is not a complex video game background, this is a simple mix of tools built in Photoshop.
We don't limit the amount of files with the same subject.
And Roland should immanently stop this requests based in "personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content" I already told him that is absurd requests and he ignored. And deletion request is not a stage for questions. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personality and/or copyright issues, hence, out of Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Offhand I can't imagine what the personality rights issues would be, beyond the inevitable in any photo of people. This appears to be people speaking at a public forum, which in almost all countries is OK to photograph. Could you elaborate?
  • As for copyright issues, what issue are you claiming? If you have reason to think the uploader didn't take the photo, please say so. Otherwise, the only possible issue I see is what's on the wall behind the people who are the subject of the photo; that can be solved by cropping. - Jmabel ! talk 00:10, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:50, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a particularly bad attempt at creating a svg coat of arms. Not so much the cross, stars and roses, those are fair enough, but the animal in the middle, supposedly an eagle, looks like a cross between a dead chicken and a crab, and definitely NOT how it should look (compare the png file).

The file has been sitting here for 7 years without improvements, effectively showing a wrong coat of arms in a multitude of articles. It should be deleted, perhaps then someone would produce a correct svg version. Rosenzweig τ 22:38, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have included a halfway decent eagle from File:Template - Grand Master of the Teutonic Order.svg. I also turned the stars like in the PNGs. (It seems indeed impossible to create an SVG coat of arms that is so bad it will not be used instead of a good PNG.) Watchduck (quack) 15:31, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the scary animal was replaced by a cute one - file is in use and no copyright issues were stated. --Jcb (talk) 16:59, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo showing identifiable girl, i.e. seriously personality rights isusses and/or 'family album' content, oubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:59, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Seems to me that it's of ethnographic interest (so of educational use). What personality rights issues arise beyond the usual for any photo of a person? Looks like it was taken in a public place, and has a {{Personality rights}} notice; is there some law in the particular country it's from that pertains? And what is the basis for saying there is a copyright issue? I see nothing on that front beyond an assertion. - Jmabel ! talk 00:07, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete maybe in scope, but copyright issues (photo of a photo) --Didym (talk) 15:31, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • What is the actual basis for a deletion request here? I see stuff all over the map, some of it contradicting each other. If it is a photo of a photo by the underlying photo is, as asserted by the uploader, the uploader's own work, certainly a scan would be preferred, but there is no copyright issue. Otherwise, this is completely the opposite claim of the original basis for nomination, that this is a personal photo. - Jmabel ! talk 16:10, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely not own work of the uploader. --JuTa 16:12, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is uncited and grossly factually inaccurate Deku-shrub (talk) 23:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Deku-shrub: Point out the inaccuracy will help to correct it. A statement will not help to do anything. Also Yes it is translated from the other image. But help me to cite this. I don't know how to do that thing. I think it is meaning full. --Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 02:20, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Deku-shrub: OK done cite added. What else? --Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me)
Still not enough reasons for deletion. So request not to delete this file --Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 12:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: its in use. --JuTa 16:14, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PlatonicSolids.info

[edit]
File:IcosahedronDodecahedronDualPolyhedron.GIF

I propose to delete the 17 images of Platonic solids in Set of Platonic solids; PlatonicSolids.info. They are of such poor quality and so unabashedly promotional, that an educational use is unrealistic. (More than enough decent images can be found in Sets of all Platonic solids or Compounds of dual Platonic solids.) Watchduck (quack) 20:01, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Antonsusi: You seem to think that File:CubeOcathedronDualPair.jpg and its SVG derivate should be kept. They are the least bad, and I would not mind excluding them from the deletion request. But I would also not see the point of that. The SVG repeats the sloppiness of the original. Like in the other compounds the edges do not intersect — it is just not as bad as in File:DodecahedronIcosahedronDualPair.jpg.
Anyway, you should express your opinion here, instead of just deleting the notifications on the file description pages. What do you mean by "Illegal request, because there is no nomination page"? This seems like a nomination page to me, and the box you removed linked to it.
Your characterisation of my deletion request as a bad-faith ("Vandalism. Abuse of deletion request only to prevent an including in the German Wikipedia") is absurd and unproductive. The reason I propose these images for deletion is their underwhelming quality and promotional nature — and not our disagreement in de:Kuboktaeder. (And my edit there was clearly about consistent vs. inconsistent colors, and not about "forcing through my images".) Watchduck (quack) 17:26, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Your notifications have since yesterday not been listed here. There was no link to a page for discus the requests. The have been formally incorrect. To the facts:

  • Whish criteria do you use to told this images as "poor quality"? Is there any error visible? No.

There is no neutral criteria, all images are well enough for use. Iti's simply your point of view, that they are poor quality.

  • You added the deletion requests immediately after replacing the SVGs with PNG or JPG images, created by you.

My opinion is, that it is very clear that you want the deletions only to prevent replacing back your images with the SVGs, a case of bad faith.

The given reason to delete is simply not true, therefore: keep the images. Antonsusi (talk) 10:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


"Your notifications have since yesterday not been listed here."   What is that supposed to mean? This page has been here for weeks.
"There was no link to a page for discus the requests."   These were the pages before you removed the infoboxes: JPG, SVG
"Whish criteria do you use to told this images as "poor quality"?"   The edges in the dual compounds do not intersect. This shows that the uploader did not even bother to use the correct coordinates. (The coordinates of the compound of two tetrahedra are just those of a cube. I find it unbelievable that the uploader has managed to screw them up.)
"replacing the SVGs with PNG or JPG images, created by you"   Who made an image is just as irrelevant to me as its file extension. And File:Cuboctahedron.jpg was not created by me. What matters to me is the consistency of colors, and I don't care if this or that image is used.
There is still the promotional aspect. DanRadin has uploaded these images with a single purpose account to serve as free advertisement for his homepage, where he tries to sell merchandise with these images. The watermarks of the animations are probably bigger than acceptable (Commons:Watermarks). Watchduck (quack) 19:24, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Convienence links, List of images:

--JuTa 16:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: nearly unusable due to bis watermarks/advertising. --JuTa 16:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948, or even that the picture would have been taken before 1948. Jcb (talk) 21:03, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is from the collection of the Norwegian Directorate for Cultural Heritage, who claims it is in the public domain. Although they haven't provided a date, this is fairly standard practice for old photos which they own. Vinguru
It may be standard practice by them to assume PD for old pictures, but without more information we cannot take that for granted. A lot of archives make bogus claims about picture in their collection. Jcb (talk) 06:26, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unknown author, unknown date -> unknown copyright status. --JuTa 16:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]