Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 9th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF copyright holder is Raymond Kriel. Uploader = subject and claims "own work". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wiki scienses5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Re-upload of previsouly deleted file.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: personal work, no notable people. - Fma12 (talk) 00:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --matanya talk 19:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Der Buckesfelder as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Seems to be a professional photo. Please provide some form of evidence other than opinion (which I may not disagree with) to use the speedy process! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb. --Achim (talk) 19:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Der Buckesfelder as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Seems to be a professional photo Please provide some form of evidence other than opinion (which I may not disagree with) to use the speedy process! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Jcb. --Achim (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 12:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim (talk) 19:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Der Buckesfelder as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Probably copyvio with multiple images Please provide some form of evidence other than opinion (which I may not disagree with) to use the speedy process! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Probably copyvio with multiple images

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 2 February 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster or advertisement. copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unused images. Little to no encyclopedia or educational value. Out of scope. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Vandalism

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unused images. Little to no encyclopedia or educational value. Out of scope. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Vandalism

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Irum Naqvi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on these portraits, small and without metadata and also some distorted and bordered. No photographer would upload this poor quality images if they were their own pictures.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Irum Naqvi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these pictures, either. User has an open Deletion Nomination, appears to be uploading copyvios after warning/s.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Irum Naqvi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from various sources, not of which have any proof of any licence. Uploader needs to be warned about this issue.

Slangcamms (talk) 04:35, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Simon_B_D_Johansen_(2).jpg#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D Draventhe3 (talk) 23:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Small unused personal photo without metadata, the user's only upload. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content: thumbnail format and missing EXIF data to verify origin - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 12:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment: a thumb-duplicate of File:Kadripark043.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 12:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate. --Pleclown (talk) 19:05, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alif ahmad99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos are out of project scope.Quality is bad.

CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan: Mass deletion of pages added by Alif ahmad99

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fronl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Creation Date of "Stadturkunde": 1950.
  • Creation Date "Partnerschaft": 1964.
Source of Stadturkunde Grevens.jpg: [1]. All content is copyrighted (see page 2 of the document). No written permission yet. --Siwibegewp (talk) 01:55, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Convinced. Therefore, the uploader agrees to the deletion decision. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fronl (talk • contribs)


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roktim polash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 03:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roktim polash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 23:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:46, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mariasmutok (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-res images, no EXIF, likely copyvio.

Яй (talk) 03:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Appears to come from here: http://heraldicaargentina.com.ar/3-Cba-Pasco.htm. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wpsfans

[edit]

Wrong licensing and screenshots of Windows.

Darklanlan (talk) 10:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juancoronado1974 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality drawings. None of them is being used. Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 10:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by A.K.Cyber Cefe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably it will be never used.

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 11:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CecileM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nudge squidfish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/file storage. Not used


Just to let people know that I am "not" using this as a private photo album/music file storage. I will be using these files for my bio page on wiki. The wave file will be used as a sample of my art for visitors to review. The UFO photos will be used for updates or postings as needed. Also, might use them as a "case review" for other contactees to compare their experience of UFO craft and beings. I plan to set up a private web site in conjunction with other folks to share private information about events. Please note that I am a "non-profit artist/contactee". I am still trying to understand the "how to do it" of my bio page on wiki. I plan to delete any unused image or wave files once I get the bio page right. Until then I respectfully request that nothing be deleted.Thanks Nudge Squidfish

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nudge squidfish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 00:32, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as per nomination. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 16:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom SinghIsFxing (talk) 03:23, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Anthony Roll

[edit]

These images were all uploaded by User:Peter_Isotalo. I believe they should be deleted because [These images are not in the public domain. The images are in copyright and have been scanned from a book 'The Anthony Roll of Henry VIII's Navy', Copyright Navy Records Society, 2000.]. Cathsuth (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: 2D reproductions of 2D 16th century works. Printing it in a book or scanning it from a book does not generate new copyright. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Herrytrump (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miasabelly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like TV screenshot.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:39, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jahil Debaets (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There are several situations here: There are photos from two cameras and then a lot of photos with no camera. The ones with camera data are selfies, and personal images out of scope. The ones without meta include a wedding photo in a boat, a series of rephotographs of old black and white images and old color images. Many of these are duplicated; you can see the one on the lined paper, and then the cropped one later. Please read COM:L before making more uploads.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rachun Dunia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images, three logos and five promotional images with text.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tjameye (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs ... Appear to all have been copied from television, see the source lines.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ritikagoenka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs, This group of images was clearly collected from the web and is not user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vandoren60 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images of wind-instrument players and other musicians.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on any of these files: two photos and the rest citations or awards, or books or something.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ValenNewell's (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All images appear to be from 3rd party sources, no evidence that uploader is the copyright owner

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:43, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am new to wikipedia and uploaded this file being unaware that it can be done without access to public. I found an option to update the photo and I would rather do it this way (to be precised the cover art of a game was updated). Justynacigames (talk) 21:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 06:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned user logo (?). Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. — ξxplicit 07:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ByMeForYou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BRJ1990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of scope

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 09:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, user blocked, out of scope. Yann (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete An encyclopedic, freely licensed, photo of the school's wider exterior would be welcome. But this one is a personal photo from a blocked user, only incidentally placed in front of the school gate. Selfies and other personal photos are out of scope. GermanJoe (talk) 12:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 11:58, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as imho rather 'profiling' and 'advertising' (>"Kerala Model"), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia Commons projects, Roland zh (talk) 12:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality and tagged files, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality and tagged files, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 12:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the file in our project scope? Taivo (talk) 13:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark, commentary on the picture, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 14:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, and watermark Pippobuono (talk) 14:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfredito19 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, with insufficient description Pippobuono (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amanbir II (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test images of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal text in PDF file Pippobuono (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:44, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value TimothyJosephWood 16:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value TimothyJosephWood 16:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational value TimothyJosephWood 16:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope, image used for vandalism by now-indef blocked user on enwiki. Acroterion (talk) 17:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; failed blurry image, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:46, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; fuzzy picture, no educational value, unusable. P 1 9 9   17:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, unused, uncategorized and containing works by others on the wall and the screen. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; unusable poor quality pic, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajmohanaushik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not Facebook, nor any form of social media site. These are personal selfies of a non-notable individual and out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, used for vandalism by sockpuppet accounts on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, used for vandalism by sockpuppet accounts on enwiki Acroterion (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yhoury (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal artworks are out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No apparent educational utility on this photograph of four letters on a parapet with background all blurry, no location. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as no permission (No permission since) - may be or may not be PD-signature Jcb (talk) 15:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by PumpkinSky 25 May 2017. --Achim (talk) 16:59, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad Aqdas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized text file in png format. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized text file in png format. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT don't advertise stuff on Commons! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; unusable poor quality pic, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload; unusable poor quality pic, out of scope. P 1 9 9   19:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe not educationally useful due to unclearness. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe no educationally usable. A bit unclear image of a shadow and leaves, I think. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lacks notability Daphne Lantier 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 20:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:03, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's probably an advertisement, the page was deleted on tr.wiki Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, see file desc, out of scope. Achim (talk) 20:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bit blurry private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:18, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, probably private image. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strangecalypso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private photo gallery. Out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   22:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 22:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user Theregulator1978 uploads

[edit]

Stupid uploads of a troll indef blocked on English wikipedia. Staszek Lem (talk) 22:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty list -- previosuly deleted?. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:48, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission, or evidence of it being released under the stated license. -Gage (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per DR (1), DR (2), DR (3) about the same trophy: derivative work of the Jules Rimet Trophy, the rights to which are held by FIFA. - Fma12 (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per similar DR: (1), (2), (3):

Derivative work of CONCACAF Champions League trophy, established in 2008. Still copyrighted by CONCACAF (continental governing football body) . - Fma12 (talk) 00:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR: (1), (2) - Derivative work of a trophy created by Peruvian artist Alberto de Gásperi in about 1960, so is still copyrighted. - See sources here (1), here (2) - Fma12 (talk) 00:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete, please.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per similar DR: (1), (2), (3), among others. Derivative work of FIFA Club World Cup, a trophy copyrighted by FIFA since 2000. - Fma12 (talk) 00:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per similar DR: DR (1), DR (2), DR (3) - Trophy established in 1960 by UEFA and CONMEBOL together, still copyrighted by both bodies. - Fma12 (talk) 00:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:50, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Virtually identical to File:Northcarolinaareacodes.gif, and it's a poor quality .gif map. File:USA telephone area code map - North Carolina.svg is much better, and even if you want the multitude of distracting names everywhere, you can use Northcarolinaareacodes.gif. Nyttend (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, if anything, the other image may be deleted, since it does not contain the overlay code. This one should have been submitted as a new version of the first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbrose (talk • contribs) 23:03, 9 February 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As noted by Kbrose, the other does not have the 336/743 overlay. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are three reasons this image should be deleted. It is against New Mexico Historic Site Policy to photograph this work of art. This also violates the wishes of the Native American cultural stakeholders who wish for this work of art not to be reproduced. It is NOT public domain. These images were painted in 1938, so this has not entered the public domain, because it is NOT 100 years plus the life of the artist. 75.173.113.72 04:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong KEEP
1) These are restorations of 15th-16th c. Art, and so PD by Wikipedia PD:ART/PD:OLD policy.
2) Re: tribal objections. Clearly, NM State Parks disagrees with you. And you are flat wrong about photo restrictions there. --Pete Tillman (talk) 13:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The only one of the restrictions alleged above that we might actually honor is copyright. I suggest you learn about the complexities of US copyright. There is not now and never has been any 100 year rule. The applicable law requires notice; there is none, so that even if the 1938 restoration might have had a copyright, it never did. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small size, no EXIF, all over the net. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 05:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: small size, no EXIF,. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader doesn't want it to be keep uploaded due to copyright issues Syoung3570 (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Second party copyright in file description. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader doesn't want it to be keep uploaded due to copyright issues Syoung3570 (talk) 06:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Second party copyright in file description. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nandikingsuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I have doubt that these files are uploader's own work.

GÆL 07:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sinned 17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo album. Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 07:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in France. See the template {{NoUploads}} in Category:Raoul Dufy. The uploader had obviously been misled by the blanket mention concerning the Fonds Albert de Pomme de Mirimonde at Gallica. Should be moved to WP for use under fair use.— Racconish ☎ 07:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliothèque nationale de France, Gallica, clearly mentions Droits : domaine public (see i for information, top of left tool bar) here: http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8431359v/f1.item Coldcreation (talk) 12:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
As explained, this is a generic mention : "appartient à l’ensemble documentaire : Mirimonde1". This is a frequent issue with Gallica, e.g. art works published in L'Assiette au beurre. Here the matter is very simple as the creation of the original work postdates 1923. — Racconish ☎ 13:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm fairly confident that the notice for public domain is specific for this image, according to the information listed on the Gallica URL posted above. Coldcreation (talk) 15:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pomme de Mirimonde is a famous French iconographer who collected documents on ancient music (see here). He donated his collection to the Réunion des Musées nationaux [2] [3]. In any case, he owned documents, reproductions, not the copyright on the original works if such works had not fallen in the public domain. A reproduction of an artwork by Dufy is an exception in this huge collection of documents pertaining chiefly to music that predates the 2Oth century. This particular document seems to be a black and white photograph of the painting Le Grand Concert (1948) [4], one of Dufy's last works, bequested by his wife to the Musée des Beaux-Arts de Nice and currently in its collection Raoul Dufy. The claimed license, {{PD-1923}}, is not applicable to a 1948 work. — Racconish ☎ 20:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To avoid ambiguity, I've replaced the PD-1923 tag with PD-GallicaScan: "This image from the National Library of France (BnF) is a reproduction by scanning of a bidimensional work that is now in the public domain... For this reason, it is in the public domain." Coldcreation (talk) 11:25, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Claiming PD and CC-SA is not the best way to avoid ambiguity Clin. — Racconish ☎ 22:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: There are two different copyrights here -- the one owned by Dufy's heirs and the one for the photograph. We ignore the latter under Bridgeman and that is the only one that is freely licensed here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image has a copyright claim and it isnt from the uploader WereSpielChequers (talk) 08:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:11, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

propably copied from the internet without permission. Google image search: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiv346v6kFk7ebUsL1gsJQ_1qdlyvgVS2k6OE5SwQ0N-NWs4fW7QS3GuRG3erImswaK6zNhvG1smgwLlp47JBrrWF6EdB1gPBNGV_1GEvedZ17DjeJOJPyWgc3hvUPM-XH6L6TTHac7mLN8iX2mMEzXV8-y6aqGZ73Xwz-p3VPnYaw5dKPuWKdqG3Ot4uhoQ_1fNIBIPSPcK7aQ12IO-XkgPq7EBOhKpPwIapzQCUDKQ_1-QqvXEiLc773qs4NC_1j2F4KEgOHmBf6jixVbXZKwvGQungHB16OVSrNhWs6-W2x1NbyNah_1b4UPG0_1d8Mc6qhyjy9Lq3ZGTkUQQPbxWhiAZHjZz7UJ8bkqtbHv9DcZqiisSlUC-i6zool0gDAF2bShYX57GZegIY8AzsrExMPORw3NPpXvGRJrNIwSfNnwp-oNSafNIL8Nw1DkoPlG0N_1GhNBxKgmghWVAtR4bvbmQivQ9QCcXOXa_1tXPDj6FCytI1N_1FNN0rjM_1wJ9eWBfVdWsMSsohXNpcMJhXZHUqh87_1VFfEOGlDUv2_1_1IgeHqqoegSb22x8zg0wnX-fnSecpr68RKwLr3wi8QUTYoNx_1etkPIeOg_1CVxnczedA3hpU_16pVzQIKqXzARl-x7zwOTBy5q3wK-K01xH-1LfkxFTkPLiCN3YTgHOv-fR4dU5Sal2TOPb9AOyROtmNjpjCt-Re1lNlDmaQJpSKDBc73_1OrPTf8i_1W4j0Vo_1BRSlZAgxeOFlXQVYkUtgdPdQCAqQBoDDKMcdRbqxZp5TWJNuiVt4y2VR0oY4hY7zuDDqmQHo_1K4yoSryShkvKz4z-JSpX9YU4Jx6K7dYLHh3qwTdFLzanPMkJot4wDc-7ft7TLLxfHvSLRrfLgiOmfUmmk51Rr8IBLy71ci4knxQCC9FuVsXns1Nv0uscKNF2hoG5I-DyRmsVeyjlRmnjJMB5wmXCyNEVlRtw9hKO6Du3t8VUsImVdGuKhMAdUEpxMU_1PGLpmVG6bXBLwjKHx49NpUMTLHtj_1PJX5o0yVQBb8R6wwjNr72xVUt8a8KY3AGQLb7geEjaZohkGiROA0duzuRBymQGHiwPyUSrt4eXdpkqgH6YS8CZ569as2B0bf87Y6vFQm4ACzZa0wqmYDietstcdWSo47GCpDkZI7GuUcC_1vx-uogMTG9fyHzJ4ZNC2XqxV0p9zh0xVZcBCAYpWT1dOgv4aIvecB6wcVxAV1FYJDjDTWk5LVHwXZKoEHXOp8XoCqZ3zo48JhTSjM0oopFh35vvL7nsJkJz29nPQH7HTFGYbkMdgmL3g4Tm_1XsA-nLILWSpJbtM0N3Z1yc7d3yFeKf3wQ7VldXxIBK9vuMlY-kG3AfSMRdR9oAqVyK9LLJLwnd4eho1jqtIeOt4oUp2aiYPfTW9DBX2yQry1worsMvzj7_16CRpa9Jo8SimfWCRkmenafGvZ_1V8tNxbnohChIwU_1fQ_1XMBbq90MqZdpZELskinZLczrU0RS63bc9bErDqSCqqPgaV0IEaTV92dM0wgvxHvMQ6hkgxAaZVCUeBojVwJdnAMdu_1bTib9wzBAbkjT_1l6MhdgxFLAs4lfNT68P3MIv1mZ-yuhs5Wx38INhMFH-tOBP9s7_1fVzsfon51BIrW3RRc1_1XVr9fEuKVOvrdPFIXQDSzE0GmBt90fVrlN6UYFnhOVCXvQ&hl=nl-US Elly (talk) 10:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: There are no Google hits that are anything like this size -- this is much larger than any Web images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale. This PD rationale is only valid if more than 15 years have passed since the photographer's death, but professor Knut Erik Tranøj died in 2012,[5] which is less than 15 years ago. (There is also no evidence to support the claim that this photograph, supposedly taken in Cambridge, was first published in Norway. The "source" is a deeplink directly to the image. The actual immediate source appears to be http://pointopoint.blogg.org/ludwig-wittgenstein-parcours-images-a116324916, which does not contain any information about where the image was first published, which is required for this PD rationale.) LX (talk, contribs) 10:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The PD rationale was changed from {{PD-Norway50}} to a nonsensical and unsupported {{PD-URAA-Simul}} claim by Volsav, who also blanked out the notice pointing to this discussion, despite the clear instructions that it is not to be removed before the discussion is closed. LX (talk, contribs) 16:09, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project's scope: either "Self-promotion" or "Not educationally useful" (or both). Googling for "раскладка Фёдорова" returns only this file; other search efforts provide no evidence of existance of the thing DmitTrix (talk) 11:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer in usage. Author self request. JerryofWong (talk) 11:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:16, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wolfang Laib, the artist, is still alive. We need his explicite authorization to release pictures of his work. Léna (talk) 11:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gaetano Pesce is still alive ; we need his explicit authorization to publish pictures of his work. Léna (talk) 11:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bernard Buffet, the artist, died in 1999. We need explicit authorization of his beneficiaries to publish a picture of his work. Undelete in 2070 when his work enters public domain. Léna (talk) 11:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alfred MANESSIER, the artist, died in 1993. We need explicit authorization from his beneficiaries to have the right to publish a picture of his work. Undelete in 2064, when his work enters public domain. Léna (talk) 11:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fernand Léger, the artist, died in 1955. We need explicit authorization of his beneficiaries to publish a picture of his work. Undelete in 2026, when his work enters public domain. Léna (talk) 11:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gaetano Pesce, the artist is still alive ; we need his explicit authorization to publish pictures of his work. see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Chandelier-Gaetano Pesce-1997.jpg Léna (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jean-Paul Riopelle, the artist, died in 2002. We need explicit authorization from his beneficiaries to be able to publish pictures of his work. Undelete in 2073 when his work enters public domain. Léna (talk) 11:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mark Handforth, the artist is still alive : we need his explicit authorization to be able to publish pictures of his work. Léna (talk) 11:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:17, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshats filters are copyrighted. Léna (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshats filters are copyrighted. Léna (talk) 11:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshats filters are copyrighted. Léna (talk) 11:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:18, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a postcard from 1960, unlikely to be available under CC-BY-SA and unlikely to be shot by an Hungarian photographer Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shame as it is a very good 1960s photo. Undelete in 2031 as the photographer is unknown. -- (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 12:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the image appears to have been taken from the cover of a book, it does not appear to be the work of the uploader. AustralianRupert (talk) 12:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, confusing chart of a private concept (it's the same Jopie Coetzee) Sascha GPD (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IIASACAT is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Unused simple textlogo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fernand Léger, the artist, died in 1955. Until his work enters the public domain (2026), we need the explicit authorization of his beneficiaries to publish images of his work. Undelete in 2026. Léna (talk) 12:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fernand Léger, the artist, died in 1955. Until his work enters the public domain (2026), we need the explicit authorization of his beneficiaries to publish images of his work. Undelete in 2026. Léna (talk) 12:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Serge Poliakoff, the artist, died in 1969. Until his work enters the public domain (2040), we need explicit authorization from his beneficiaries to publish a picture of his work. Undelete in 2040. Léna (talk) 12:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject can't be the author, we need permission from the photographer Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neagu Mircea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope.

Yann (talk) 13:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neagu Mircea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of scope

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 14:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 14:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose These images are in scope. They should be renamed and categorized, but they have encyclopedic value (depicts Carpathians, I think). This mass DR is not very helpful to the project, please nominate individual files or smaller batches if you consider they have obvious irremediable problems. --XXN, 15:10, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Yes, a few of these might be useful, but they have no categories, no useful filenames or descriptions, so it would be a massive task to actually go through them and make them useful if someone can identify the locations. I can't imagine that actually happening, so it is best to make it very clear to this uploader that he or she must provide information with files. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neagu Mircea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images - out of scope (Commons is not a social network). I'll inform uploader additionally about this.

--XXN, 15:42, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neagu Mircea (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Use for the projects not clear. User is still mass uploading close pictures.

Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 15:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:00, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not in the public domain. This has been scanned from a book 'The Anthony Roll of Henry VIII's Navy, Copyright Navy Records Society, 2000. Cathsuth (talk) 14:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The work is 16th century. The book's copyright covers only new work, not items that predate the concept of copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not in the public domain. This has been scanned from a book 'The Anthony Roll of Henry VIII's Navy, Copyright Navy Records Society, 2000. Cathsuth (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The work is 16th century. The book's copyright covers only new work, not items that predate the concept of copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbinoGarciaN21 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.fieldoo.com/images/151961/227139.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC) _____________________________________[reply]

Did Mr. EugeneZelenko read and understand the German-Language-File??? This File is an authentic source of church music in Germany. It describes the thinking and resulting leadership of a Director of Music in Baden-Württemberg and his subordinate cantor in their own formal correspondence with artist. All personally data are concealed. So it is no reason to delate this document of contemporary music history.

_____________________________________


Deleted: While I agree with Eugene that these are out of scope, there is also the fact that the copyright to the letters is owned by their authors and there is no evidence that they have given permission. Also, it is not clear how anonymized letters can have any significance. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be a notable organisation, and logo may be copyrighted. --ghouston (talk) 03:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pdf, non-free logo Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 14:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hans0714 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from mascot.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vita500 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://a1.r9cdn.net/rimg/himg/c2/0d/9c/ice-49802-photo.aspx_did=2692_brochureid=49802_publicid=8042693_instanceid=5-image.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AndréBombillá (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should be cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Own work of the user; the art is not the focus of the image, but the exhibition room/situation

Obviously copyvio. Source: [6]. Content of greven.net is copyrighted, see footer of website and [7] --Siwibegewp (talk) 01:22, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Copyright Owner is the author of the photography: me. This is my own work. Unfortunately, further evidence cannot be offered at the moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fronl (talk • contribs) 04:47, 13 February 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Picasso died 1973 so his work will be under copyright for many years. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:01, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo of The Flintstones had copyright violation. Vladimirrizov20 (talk) 16:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Sorry. But it's just a vector version of raster image. You will be not delete this. BOMBA (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No copyright for typography in the USA. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name, will be uploaded again nuder correct ending Bocardodarapti (talk) 17:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Do not upload this again -- it is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images of posters are not "own work" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO Movie posters are not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO Movie posters are not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in meta shows that this image has been in and out of Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in meta shows this image has been in and out of Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Notice the flash artefact lower right corner which shows this was rephotographed, and is not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Halftoning appears to show that this has been duplicated from a previously published source, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, and smaller than Facebook, plus no indication of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, small file size, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copied from prior source, notice white edges and small file size, no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Letterboxing appears to show that this was copied from a media source, like a television or video screen. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If uploader name is same as person in the image, and this is obviously not a selfie, with small file size and white borders, this can't be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller than facebook, no useful meta and no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the iPhone5s was available in 1979, the stated date of this image. Perhaps it was used to rephotograph an older image? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claire Garguier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These three images appear to be copied from an older published source without attribution.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Halftoned, appears to be copied from older published source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper, book & magazine covers are not "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:08, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper, book & magazine covers are not "own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Border at bottom shows this isn't the original, also of low quality and small. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright info on image seems to contradict provided info Ytoyoda (talk) 17:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this tiny image of movie personalities. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image watermarked with Ukraine Olympic committee logo

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perks97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clip art, not the uploader's work

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antonio.mongiello (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duplicated photos of two buildings of modern architecture, but there is no Freedom of Panorama COM:FOP in Italy for architecture even if taken from a public place.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been around the web awhile before being here, see http://www.daz.com.tw/robby-cantarutti/, and other uses. It appears to be cut from a larger image of two people, and likely is from their company's website originally. Even if the uploader were this individual, it's obviously not a selfie. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Spanico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of users own work on any of these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:10, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Each image in a collage (here are four) needs its own source and proper license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Collage of unattributed images, one is clearly labeled "Shutterstock". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bank logo (very small and unusable) is very likely also not user's own work, as it appears on the outside of a bank building on a canopy in a different photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taco Boxes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images are not from the uploader, but copyright violations. E.g. Paul-Barker 100323 9948-.jpg is from Stephane Burlot. COM:PCP!

Ras67 (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sidney Silva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have significant doubt that this image was created by uploader because all their other uploads were copyvios and easily found in reverse Google search, COM:PRP suggests this one is as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would appear that the copyright for the sumbitted image is being questioned.

I was the project architect for the heritage conservation component of the Wellington Building between 2008-2016. I assure you that the photo is one of several taken by a member of EVOQ Architecture staff (namely Philippe Laflèche [email protected], who has since left our firm) for promotional reasons. I myself requested that bird's eye photos be taken from the vantage point of the Confederation Building, where we were also designing a window restoration contract at the time. A series of comparable photos taken from a similar vantage point at different times of the day are available for reference in the following location: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/nejkxb7u0opqjdt/AABGppAoUAX-drnMtM4LZDg_a?dl=0

With this in mind, I request that the photo be reinstated.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Norbert baas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images, if "Norbert Baas" is really in all these images, they're not selfies.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mithila N S (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book and magazine covers are not "own work".

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in the metadata shows this image has been in and out of Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be from a power point presentation, contains derivative work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samantray renuka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious rephotographs, not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, this looks like it was photographed from a CRT tube. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader did not create depicted trophy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook source, no permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata reads "FBMD....." Probably not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FB IMG and size suggest this image is from Facebook and not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, a real creator wouldn't upload this blurry with bad description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful claim of own work on this small image of three people holding a tropy. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Domingo510 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small sizes, no metadata and no indication of user's own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LSP2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment They are used in ru.wiki, but the article is there presented for deletion due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no longer in use. INeverCry 00:15, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LSP2013 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images of "Negd Pul" ... all smaller than facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify copyright issues as sourced "Keraleeyam Magazine", but also, but also personality rights isusses - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Collection privata de familie" is unfortunately not permission from photographer or heirs. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pagriho83 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs... all copied from books / publications including the captions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Art books, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files are on Flickr with the 'Public Domain Mark', which is not a valid license, see Template:Flickr-public domain mark. As long as the license is not changed at source, we cannot keep these files.

Jcb (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: It is well established that the PDM is not a license and threfore not acceptable on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Taken from Flickr with the invalid PDM license, no longer available at source.

Jcb (talk) 21:06, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Admin Fae contacted the copyright owner Jillian Sallaway and she categorically rejected her images being used on Wikimedia Commons in her reply to him in a separate DR of another set of her photos and then deleted them on her flickr account. The images were originally licensed as Public Domain Mark. This means that Commons cannot use these images since they never passed review as I think other Admins such as Josve05a might view this situation. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedily. Per prior discussion of images from this Flickr account, and author's request they not be on Commons. - Reventtalk 06:49, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this, Doug Waite is a retired member of the USN and therefore, {{PD-USGov-Military}} does not apply

Discasto talk 22:40, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He is still a member of the US Naval Reserve, as far as I could gather, and was acting in that capacity when he took these photos. If that is not the case, we will have to find a separate PD categorization for these images. However, they were made public domain. SecretName101 (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The last image you included was not credited to Doug Waite. SecretName101 (talk) 22:57, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment No, he's acting as a member of the Blue and Gold committee. Membership is not restricted to (retired) servicemen and therefore there's no "that capacity" involved. You're right with regard the last image. --Discasto talk 06:42, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am presuming the uploader was not being dishonest in labeling these images. If that is the case, are these images eligible as {{cc-zero}} SecretName101 (talk) 21:46, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'm also presuming good faith. This is not a problem of mallicious license washing (as far as I understand) but a mistake (always IMHO, I can be wrong). Thus, an admin will assess our arguments. Best regards --Discasto talk 14:06, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's sad to say I'm afraid LCS7 Imagers might have made a mistake when he uploaded these images to Flickr: he set Public domain flag only to this album, while other albums are "All rights reserved" including this album (Photo by Doug Waite). --miya (talk) 15:18, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD in the United States.

Mdaniels5757 (talk) 16:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the page on which this is in use, the artist has not been dead 70 years. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork on display without permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork on display without permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork on display without permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork on display without permission from the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some kind of personal image, but unused and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Germany has the PMA 70 rule. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 19:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. User is not a contributor, his only edits consist of creating a user page. Jcb (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mudigonda senapati (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:32, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a video, source not indicated Ytoyoda (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gdirwin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Flash-burned images of some kind of screen, also containing derivative works in some images (including rolling stones logo), and what seems like a navigation map. All Derivative Works.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also no useful filenames, descriptions, or cats. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, very small and low quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits tobias oelgart Ytoyoda (talk) 19:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has sensitive information 122.167.236.199 02:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Wutsje (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Fictional information only is posted. –Juliancolton | Talk 04:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Malik Abdul Aziz (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The 2010 DR was for a very different reason. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mulbah Koquoi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Notoriety ?

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no useful cat, filename, description. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subhajit santra 123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Notoriety ?

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Source: France TV". probably a screenshoot from a tv show. Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extracted from file that is now deleted Dudek1337 (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extracted from file that is now deleted Dudek1337 (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1960 postcard, unlikely to be CC-BY-SA as stated on fortepan Herzi Pinki (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. France has the PMA 70 rule. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author of this 1937 work would have died before 1942. Jcb (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EdgarEditor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright owned by gobierno del de tamaulipas or the professional photographer who took the pictures. Not the uploader's own work as claimed.

Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 22:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Category:Monument by Manaf Halbouni

Copyvio - unfortunately this installation is limited until april 2017, thus not permanent and so not covered by German FoP 2001:A61:3281:5101:21D:60FF:FE54:B8ED 22:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete Freedom of panorama doesn't apply for this case, yes. However the installation appears to simply consist of three upright buses - is this considered copyrightable art in Germany? Gestumblindi (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It was ordered from an accomplished artist and paid for as public art, it gets media cover as public art - under the duck test I think we should treat it as such. --h-stt !? 12:13, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This Sculpture is an independent work of art in public space. It is not inseparable connected to an immovable object, e.g. like the Wrapped Reichstag. This work of art can be moved to another location and re-placed there in the same way. The German freedom of panorama is valid. The German Federal Court of Justice held in 2002, that it does not require the work to remain at its place for the entire duration of its existence (Freedom of panorama - Germany). The temporary setting up of an independent work of art does not violate the freedom of panorama in Germany. It should be emphasized once again that, what matters is not the actual duration of the presentation. --Rilegator (talk) 09:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Plain nonsense. This is a temporary art installation, with very limited duration. It will not be moved to another place for continued exhibition, it will be demolished. Thus German FoP does not apply - and no other permission exists. --h-stt !? 12:11, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep We see three busses from the down side. The three busses are a technical product. The "sculpture" isn't selfmade. This isn't an artist product. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 10:53, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wie wäre es, wenn ihr einfach mal bei Künstler nachfragt, ob der das OK findet, anstatt hier wild rum zu löschen und rum zu spekulieren?

Stimmt. Hier: https://www.manaf-halbouni.com könnte man nachfragen. Wer macht es? --Alchemist-hp (talk) 01:06, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
eine Anfrage dort habe ich am 10. Februar gestellt und bislang keine Antwort erhalten. Aber vielleicht hat er ja stattdessen an permissions-commons-de@... geantwortet. --C.Suthorn (talk) 07:19, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Clearly temporary. In order for a work to qualify for German FOP it must be intended that the work will remain in one place for its entire life. That is clearly not the case here. Equally, it is clearly intended to be art and is certainly described as such in the press. Utilitrain objects can be copyrighted art if used in non-utilitarian ways. Plainly these buses are not going to carry passengers. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value: very small, dark pic: much better pics of her are available, such as File:Sera Gamble.jpg Daphne Lantier 23:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture published by the Twitter account of the Festival in November 2015. No OTRS authorization from the original author. Titlutin (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Germany has the PMA 70 rule. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:49, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:43, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as an icon of non-notable software. (See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAGMA (Molecular Animation, Graphics and Modeling Application framework)). 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams with an enormous watermark (which may removed?), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, many alternatives available. P 1 9 9   17:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams with an enormous watermark (which may removed?), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, many alternatives available. P 1 9 9   17:40, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 16:38, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Tom-L (talk) 10:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 07:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the Soviet Union.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2008 panoramio streams of rather personal interest ('family album'), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2008 panoramio streams of rather personal interest ('family album'), hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
btw: , file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 19:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akrogonac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duplicates of File:Anastasia McQueen.jpg

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 17:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akrogonac (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Watermarking indicates uploader is not the copyright owner

Ytoyoda (talk) 19:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Webmasterfonds (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographe : Yves Lacombe, Montréal 2016

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy vio http://www.freedomnewspaper.com/6796-2/ or http://www.freedomnewspaper.com/gambia-breaking-news-mama-kandeh-finally-cleared-by-the-iec-as-iec-approves-mamas-gdp-party/ Atamari (talk) 19:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of this picture published on multiple websites. No OTRS authorization from the original author. Titlutin (talk) 22:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Theregulator1978 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality, unused images. Little to no encyclopedia or educational value. Out of scope.

EvergreenFir (talk) 19:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Magog the Ogre. --Érico (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#Canada. Pictures of signs are considered derivative works under Canadian copyright law. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:05, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:23, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains the copyrighted logo of Japan Airlines (per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Japan Airlines logos) Moonian (talk) 05:13, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (only copyrighted revisions) per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:24, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably out of scope Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 06:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Der Buckesfelde: we have a permission, see this ticket: Ticket#2017020910007576 --Pallerti (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per OTRS agent, we have permission. --PierreSelim (talk) 19:29, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a halftone, therefore clearly not "own work" as claimed. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not own work per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:52, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Policy does not allow PDFs of text. Any text needed for an article should be set in Wiki markup. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of project scope per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:53, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality copy of File:Gerard_David_-_The_Annunciation_-_WGA6019.jpg Rettinghaus (talk) 08:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the image is used in many places. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hardus Hartzenberg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All other files uploaded by this new user have been blatant copyright violations. These both show "Iconic Management" as the author, not Hardus Hartzenberg, who claims that they are his "own work".

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, e.g. https://plus.google.com/photos/112388638392357163304/albums/profile/6272267204550072994. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:53, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation? Uploader is Miss wiki 2017, Photographer Toni Kretschmer. Derbrauni (talk) 13:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination derivative work of the film on the screen (not DM). Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Treewalks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.consciouslifestylemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Moringa-Oleifera-leaves-blossom-plant-hi-res.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moringa fruit and flower.jpg, shot in 2007 can be found here and here incl EXIF data. --Achim (talk) 20:35, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as duplicate and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|1=File:2099-009 15 Logo InLoox-Name-72DPI-RGB-03.jpg.png. The file is a jpg, so not duplicate, that said the licence does not correct.  — billinghurst sDrewth 10:34, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Creator:Sri Chinmoy died in 2007. A lot of the images in Category:Sri Chinmoy are questionable, too. Many of them are taken from http://srichinmoyphoto.com/ . --тнояsтеn 11:42, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have contacted uploader and picture owner perhaps he write her.--Richard Reinhardt (talk) 19:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

- All published pictures have a proper copyright by myself because I am the photographer and blog editor of http://srichinmoyphoto.com/ Kedar Misani, Zurich, or I have the specific copyright from the Sri Chinmoy Centre New York, if is the question of reproduced artwork. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedarvideo (talk • contribs) 20:01, 9. Feb. 2017 (UTC)

See Commons:Licensing. Do you have the permission by the creator (ie. Sri Chinmoy)? --тнояsтеn 14:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As Sri Chinmoy is no more alive, I have the permission of the Sri Chinmoy Centre in New York. - Kedar Misani— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedarvideo (talk • contribs) 07:51, 12. Feb. 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; licencing at website is CC-by-3.0, no evidence that images are not freely licensed.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Let's speedy the article 209.242.141.26 17:00, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong Keep Maybe an article that's own photo file of spectrum center

Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Der Buckesfelder as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Including multiply unfree images Please provide some form of evidence other than opinion (which I may not disagree with) to use the speedy process! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplication of the original File:Dwornisco_Zicen.JPG j.budissin /- 17:48, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; photo says retouched, and in use by a wiki, within scope.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of basemap Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Chad.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 19:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality, pixelized... Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot, bad quality Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 20:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Sourced to WWE, but zero reason to believe WWE has licensed this under the the license indicated. See WWE's copyright statement. Hammersoft (talk) 21:08, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyright violation.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was published in newspapers in 1979, see https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=pv&GRid=120640356&PIpi=93067469 Vanjagenije (talk) 22:15, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence that able to release image, would requried OTRS permissions.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New version (as png in better quality and in color): File:Landscape Racing By.png Carl Ha (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New version (as png in better quality and in color): File:Landscape Racing By.png Carl Ha (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, use File:Landscape Racing By.png.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate upload of the same file already in category Jasonanaggie (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:1-30-17- White House Press Briefing.webm. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Uzbekistan.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:19, 9 February 2017 (UTC) Yüklediğim dosyanın silinmesini istemiyorum. Teşekkür ederim.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content as per File:Sintheeri rocks vj.png and File:Sintheeri rocks.png, but also personality rights isusses, Roland zh (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Greece and the sculpture is probably modern. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader can't be Avigdor Arikha, because Arikha died in 2010. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The user who uploaded this file is the Museum itself and I suppose they have the rights on such covers. They should add the OTRS proof tomake sure there is no more doubt.--Cbyd (talk) 21:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see User:PBA Lille; PBA Lille should have rights on the book cover. An COM:OTRS shall be preferable. Ruthven (msg) 15:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright is credited to Matt Austin, but the file was uploaded by Studio Sebastian Conran. The permission of the photographer is required. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment from the EXIF it seems a work for hire --Ruthven (msg) 15:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: EXIF also states "copyright Matt Austin", thus COM:OTRSticket needed. Ruthven (msg) 15:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be created by bubble studios, http://www.productionparadise.com/showcase/buenos-aires-issue-262-498/bubble-studios-14649.html# Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. VOA is not the owner of the photo. - Seyit talk 23:07, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: source website clearly indicates "public domain" for the file. Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fehler beim hochladen Mar123ius (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gelbstich, ersetzt durch Datei:Klara Reinhart Johann Samuel Gruner Ausschnitt Brustbild sw.jpg Petermichaelgenner (talk) 09:12, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok, uploader request, replaced by File:Klara Reinhart Johann Samuel Gruner Ausschnitt Brustbild sw.jpg. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:16, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.ibi.es/es/ciudadania/servicios-a-la-ciudadania/horarios-de-atencion-al-publico/horarios_atencion_publico 37.10.153.220 12:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation as the bottom of the site https://novo.org.br states "all rights reserved" ("todos os direitos reservados"). Vixe! (talk) 16:30, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: maybe simple enough but unused logo with questionable notability (out of scope). Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.panoramio.com/photo/112833866?force_desktop_version Ytoyoda (talk) 16:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:40, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Taivo (talk · contribs), yeah text logo is not reason, but it's out of scope (it's advertisement, yeah). Seoul 50 is city project of Seoul(yeah, it's not famous enwiki, it's domestic project. but it's not famous in S. Korea), so i thought it's advertisement files. sorry for my opinion. --책읽는달팽 (User Talk) 23:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
and this product is some transformation(you see 0 is another), so i thought copyright violation. it's under kowiki, i guess --책읽는달팽 (User Talk) 23:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused logo of questionable notability. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely false PD rationale with no supporting evidence. The date of creation is given as the date of upload, the "source" links a deep link without context, and the uploader doesn't know who the author is, so how do they know that the author has been dead for more than 100 years, and how is that possible if it was supposedly created the same day it was uploaded? Very sloppy. http://realhistoryww.com./world_history/ancient/Images_Olmec/Zouave/Zouave_1.jpg from http://realhistoryww.com./world_history/ancient/Images_Olmec/Zouave/Brazil_data.htm says it's a "modern drawing." LX (talk, contribs) 21:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

Extended content

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
  •  Keep any images listed here uploaded by me. This bot mass deletion based on a category makes proper review unnecessarily complex, and is a way of bypassing the normal DR process. -- (talk) 05:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Betty Ages photo. It's worrying that crosswiki photos like this are being unthinkingly deleted out of process. Please stop creating these crazy large automatic DRs for potentially controversial in scope images. -- (talk) 05:37, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Files which are in use on other projects must not be deleted, please remove from this DR before considering any action. An example is the photograph of Arnab Roy Chowdhury. This DR is obviously hastily prepared using automation rather than actually looking at the images nominated. -- (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: You really want to create dozens of thousands single DRs for all personal files, hosted on Commons? /St1995 21:27, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Before talking about the number of DRs, you should check if there is really a need for a deletion. Then, some of these may not be in scope, but that has to be decided on individual basis. A mass DR of hundreds of images is not the right way to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 21:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The files, as this automatic and massive DR of files of different authors, provinances, scopes (or lack of) and sources is itself out of scope. So  Delete this category as out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private playground of someone, wasting other peoples time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm (talk • contribs)
  • The problem is not in this category. @Apocheir: Please do not add files in this category which may be notable for Commons. This cat is only for personal files! /St1995 21:07, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Can someone enlighten me what is a Unused personal file, as i tought it was about out pf scope images of people, but it seems that it includes images of cars, logos (and several others logos by the way). Tm (talk) 18:21, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Speaking as someone who's been adding a lot of files to this category lately... My conception of "personal file" includes not just pictures of the users, but pictures of the user's friends and family, promotional material for the user's musical projects, logos of the user's personal business, or anything else that is really only of interest to the uploader. Basically anything where someone's trying to use Commons as their own personal photo hosting site. There was no definition of "personal file" on the category, so it's up to individual interpretation. That said, as I stated on the Talk page, I was under the impression that there would be some sort of automated review before those files were nominated for deletion. At the very least, someone needs to clean out the files that are in use! -Apocheir (talk) 22:05, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all, for now, and created separate DRs for individual files or groups thereof, based on some actual work. And, per Tm,  delete this useless and nonsensical category. It may be necessary to discuss long to reach an understanding of what a “personal image” is: One’s gut feeling is not enough. -- Tuválkin 21:41, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I think there is nothing wrong with the category in and of itself, but I would ask that someone please delete two files that I uploaded with regards to Alessandro Safina and Laura Maria Calefeteanu. I am very new here and did not read the policy on public domain photos closely enough. Thank you for bringing this issue to my attention. GrammerCracker96 (talk) 12:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment While this discussion is continuing (?) here, the DR template has been removed from the relevant page. If a majority is against these mass deletions, simply close this discussion so we can DR the files (those which are here I mean) individually or for uploader. In this situation the process is stalled and that is not correct. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - note that there are a significant number of copyvios (more than 1/3)- a few are kept (from user who made a few useful contributions, or image in scope). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal images that are of no educational use.

 Keep I think this fits fine under Category:Holi in the United States and other categories. It doesn't need to be a personal file. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This has been cropped so that it's just an image of the sign, not a personal image. In scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 11:26, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:54, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted most per nomination, kept a few which are in use/could be potentially used. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:44, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright holder: Turkish Revenue Administration. Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 13:41, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of any of the 10 pictures in this collage. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that any of the involved photographers would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Wekerletelep 1913 előtt épült. Ez az összeállítás a Pesti Napló 1850-1930-as emlékalbumában jelent meg. Mivel a szerző(k) személye nem állapítható meg, és az első nyilvánosságra hozatal 1930-ban történt, a kép jogszerű. Tambo (talk) 07:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
According Google Translate, uploader claims that publication was in 1930, but of which of the 10 pictures? Probably some or maybe even all involved authors will have been alive in 1947, so that the copyright has not yet expired and the file has to be deleted. Jcb (talk) 22:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ez egy fotómontázs. Nem egy szerző műve. Az sem tisztázott, vajon az eredeti felhasznált képek szerzői, vagy a montázs készítőjének halála a mérvadó? Tambo (talk) 10:04, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In case of a montage of 10 pictures, we need to establish the copyright situation of the 10 source pictures. See also Commons:Collages. Jcb (talk) 10:34, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A Pesti Napló 1930-ban a cenzúra miatt letiltott számainak előfizetőit akarta kárpótolni egy különszámmal. Ebből való a kép is. Nem valószínű, hogy illegális módon használt volna fel ehhez képeket. Ha mégis fontosnak tartja bárki a kép törlését, ám legyen! Tambo (talk) 13:51, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:49, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]