Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/04/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 23rd, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No sign of releasing copyright. EnWiki claims its copyrighted – en:File:ATelesyn Web Logo.png. Piastu (talk) 08:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken by Hugh Edward Richardson, who died in 2000. Wrong license. Yann (talk) 14:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"After India gained its independence from Britain in 1947 he continued in post as the Indian Government representative. … In August 1950, only a few months before the Chinese invasion of Tibet, Richardson left the civil service and Lhasa." [1].
According to { {PD India} } "… government works, and works of corporate authorship or of international organizations enter the public domain 60 years after the date on which they were first published, … Photographs created before 1958 are in the public domain 50 years after creation, as per the Copyright Act 1911. " When Richardson took the photo, he was a representative of Indian Government. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 16:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Ok, fine for me. Yann (talk) 19:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No reason for deletion. Yann (talk) 06:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP#Japan as literary work and drawing work. Vantey (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per nom and as per cleanup russavia (talk) 12:03, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architecture at Ljubljana Castle. Eleassar (t/p) 15:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep it's just stairs. --Sporti (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ok,  I withdraw my nomination. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: As nominator retracted nomination. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© BG Foods, Inc. is probably correct, but they didn't upload it to Flickr.    FDMS  4    19:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: derivative Denniss (talk) 16:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality logo. Jpeg format unsuitable for this type (eg., no transparency). Replaced with SVG (File:Arezzo & Co.svg). OAlexander (talk) 03:16, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPEG format unsuitable for this type of logo (lack of transparency, etc. ...). A replacement SVG has been uploaded (File: BRMalls.svg). OAlexander (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:18, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution and PNG format. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 21:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused user portrait 91.64.241.84 17:39, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Personal work taken from uploader's blog. Argentine Primera División (See official web) has not a logo. - Fma12 (talk) 16:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nude baseball player, at the least, it should be tagged as such. First on the list if you search for GIF. 108.17.129.2 18:59, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is here, no sign of releasing rights. Piastu (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:BookMyRose/Book My Rose). MER-C 11:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good - we have already ten pics of the same subject Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jpef format unsuitable for this type of logo. Replaced with File:Auto Viação ABC (RJ).png. OAlexander (talk) 09:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable for purpose, lack of transparency, etc. Replaced with SVG version (File:bossanovafilms-20.svg). OAlexander (talk) 09:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source/license and author information of 1 image (File:Aerial Photos in the Astara port.jpg, deleted recently per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aerial Photos in the Astara port.jpg) used in this collage is missing or is insufficient, compromising the whole file. Gunnex (talk) 12:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of a non-free photograph of Bled Island. Eleassar (t/p) 21:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped the photograph. --Sporti (talk) 05:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Apperantly fixed Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely unlikely that this is uploader's own work, particularly given how the format matches previously deleted images: 1,2. Looks almost like a screenshot from a video. The claimed datestamp in the file name is obviously bunk, given Akeson would be preparing for an NHL playoff game that night, not appearing in a Halloween skit. Resolute (talk) 00:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable for purpose, lack of transparency, too low res, etc. Replaced with SVG version (File:bossanovafilms-10.svg). OAlexander (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Distinctively low quality, unsuitable for any purpose. Replaced with File:Cetil.png. OAlexander (talk) 10:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete logo of a company that seems to lack notoriety. Out of Scope. OAlexander (talk) 09:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in United Arab Emirates. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: Added source file to this DR:
File:Burj-al-arab.jpg
   FDMS  4    15:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable person, potential personality rights, out of scope. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&curid=523680&diff=122023075&oldid=122008543 Yann (talk) 05:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free content AddisWang (talk) 04:42, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks very personal to me (feliz de la vida means happy life) …    FDMS  4    16:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notorious organisation. Scope EdUse. OAlexander (talk) 17:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion all her other uploads not yet nominated. They are small photos without metadata, quality is bad. Nothing here Commons hasn't tons. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To my understanding of Brazilian interpretation this image is somewhat beyond "simple shapes". I must therefore recommend removal. A replacement has been uploaded where the image was in use. OAlexander (talk) 08:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission not obtained for republishing with downloads enabled. See archived source link at [2]: explicit permission required. — hike395 (talk) 08:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I want removed Bluesilverball (talk) 07:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Distinctively low quality, unsuitable for any purpose. Replaced with File:Cetil.png. OAlexander (talk) 10:11, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

have uploaded this image by mistake, as it was not intended to be on licence CC 3.0, it was uploaded by mistake with a batch of others. I am selling this specific image, so it cannot be here with this licence. Celia Ascenso (talk) 09:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook logo is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

la foto contiene la dirección web de una empresa privada Tarawa1943 (talk) 22:28, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted but not by me Natuur12 (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is not at source provided, small size, low resolution, possible COM:COPYVIO, emphasis on the possible, but definately no source as it presently is stated. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notorious organization. Related article in WP:PT was deleted was deleted as "Spam/Propaganda". OAlexander (talk) 17:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate, correct one with right data and otrs ticket is at File:Kurtoskalacs spit.jpg Teemeah (talk) 12:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because these are my cats I want removed "image and I'm owe this photo Bluesilverball (talk) 07:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete, too low res. Replaced with File:Brasilata.svg. OAlexander (talk) 03:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely improbable for this poorly reproduced photo dated 1936. Jmabel ! talk 04:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unclear source. Leyo 22:43, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely improbable for this poorly reproduced photo; 2012 is certainly the wrong date for the photo itself. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maurice W. Parker, Sr. at home in Cohasset, MA.JPG: same uploader and subject. Jmabel ! talk 04:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure what the purpose of this file could be. Logo subject not identifiable, therefore no potential use. OAlexander (talk) 10:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image Torsch (talk) 14:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely improbable for this poorly reproduced photo dated 1936. Seems to be the same underlying photo as File:Maurice W. Parker, Sr. at home in Cohasset, MA.JPG. Jmabel ! talk 04:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused userpage image. JuTa 19:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too lo res. Lack of transparency. Not really suitable in this form. Replaced with File:Arno SA.svg. OAlexander (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Desinteresse Vocivoci (talk) 11:39, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image. Jespinos (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The idea once was: "Files moved into Category:German stamps review delete will eventually be deleted from Commons." Since this file is not in use in a Wikimedia project apart from Commons, I'm requesting its deletion now. Isn't it about time? The review with result "delete" happened almost two years ago. Werner Tübke died in 2004, so his painting is still copyright protected. It's the same stamp as in File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3270.jpg Miss-Sophie (talk) 14:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete, unusable logo of non-notorious organization (upload by organization). OAlexander (talk) 18:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image contains advertisement text which cannot be removed. Thus no educational value. Torsch (talk) 16:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyviol: gmaps screenshot Ciaurlec (talk) 11:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image, no educational value Torsch (talk) 20:19, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simply a "textlogo" and more than just "simple shapes". Uploaded on local Wikis were applicable. OAlexander (talk) 19:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook logo is on Commons in SVG. Fry1989 eh? 19:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, poor quality, not clear what it shows Torsch (talk) 20:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private "image" Torsch (talk) 14:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation — the image is a scaled-down copy of a graphic of the Herz pipe; one manufacturer-related document also has a larger and crisper image, which seems like the original. See file talk for details. Mardus (talk) 04:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete logo of non-notorious organisation, Upload was by company. OAlexander (talk) 18:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As the main company article was removed years ago, this image should be too (as it is obsolete and would depend on the main company article). What I don't understand, however, is how to determine if a company is or not "notorious", as we have other Brazilian companies with articles here. --Renatoat (talk) 18:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If there is no article to the logo, we wonder about things like stockmarket listing, representations in several locations, turnover, number of employees, broad media coverage, does it belong to close relatives or friends, ... OAlexander (talk) 19:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:08, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Hoo man (talk) 17:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: obvious copyvio Denniss (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of scope / lack of notoriety of company. OAlexander (talk) 09:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture presented is not PD in Italy as its creator died in 1950. The OTRS ticket concerns only the copyright to the picture itself; the uploader did not present any evidence that he has permission from sculpture author descendants. Ankry (talk) 23:05, 23 April 2014 (UTC) Image can be downloaed to Italian Wikipedia, if needed. Transfer commons -> itwiki is not possible. Ankry (talk) 23:15, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted because the sculpture is now out of copyright. De728631 (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why is it within project scope? Eusebius (talk) 21:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not the same image as File:Flag of Turkey.svg, this image has 3D shadow effects. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete--Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: obvious copyvio Denniss (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Most likely cropped from an unknown copyrighted (Panoramio) source as 2-files-uploader Aydcollege0581 (talk · contribs) already did it with File:SRMSAC Bly.01.jpg (uploaded on same day). Gunnex (talk) 14:26, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Thanks for being this hones Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:35, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:04, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this photo when I was an inexperienced Commons contributer. Looking at it again now, it appears to be a copyright violation. (photo of 2D artwork) Rept0n1x (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmontgomery77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Takuusa1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios or out of project scope images.

Jespinos (talk) 14:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a temporarily-installed poster and thereby not covered by FOP-exception of Germany. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lisa denis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-quality nudie pics, very similar to, and no better than, existing images; and Commons is not an amateur porn site. Additionally, in three images, one non-nude, all taken in private places, the subject is identifiable, and there is no evidence of consent to permit them to be published.

Rrburke (talk) 14:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lisa denis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Yesterday deleted images (out of project scope) today uploaded again.

Ies (talk) 08:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


deleted. INeverCry 00:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajaysharma007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusably blurry, out of scope Krd 17:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paco perez333 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-quality personal photos of unidentified subjects with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 08:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NewLoveCommunications (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios or out of project scope images.

Jespinos (talk) 21:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sarahsilverman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuDomini30 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios or out of scope.

Jespinos (talk) 22:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нарушение авторских прав: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/67908634 Zugr (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek046 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded in a row on 26./27.06.2012. Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.


Gunnex (talk) 19:12, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Azerty12211 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is just a lower resolution copy of this file. Both were uploaded by the same user. Zellfaze (talk) 19:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Apparently both were just taken by the same user. The higher resolution one was uploaded by another use using the copy of the photo hosted on Flickr. Zellfaze (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shashank.shirodkar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Shashank.shirodkar and exif-history (4 different digicams used in 11 months = 2x copyvio and File:Tembalai Flyover seen from University road.jpg seems to be real "own work").

Gunnex (talk) 15:58, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work 151.247.172.132 13:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Too small and blurry to be usable. Fry1989 eh? 19:10, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

нарушение авторских прав: http://www.panoramio.com/photo/68935893 Zugr (talk) 20:02, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajacuatro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: promo materials of music school of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:15, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ValerioMoroni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolutions and missing (or invalid) EXIF. The images are likely not own work.

Jespinos (talk) 22:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Охоник (talk · contribs)

[edit]

After today identifying 10 uploads as copyvio (grabbed from different Panoramio accounts, blogs, news sites etc., details at User talk:Охоник) it´s difficult to believe that these remaining files would be own work: IMHO untrusted user uploading a bunch of copyrighted material (small/inconsistent resolutions, missing exif) so these ones (per COM:PRP) can't be believed either.

Gunnex (talk) 18:14, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:10, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Охоник (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously not own works. Please provide a source, and a valid license.

Yann (talk) 06:58, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:55, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unusably blurry, out of scope Krd 17:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 04:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file Jelican9 (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low-res, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:19, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:22, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 04:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nude baseball player, at the least, it should be tagged as such. First on the list if you search for GIF. 108.17.129.2 18:59, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not good - we have already ten pics of the same subject Pierpao.lo (listening) 08:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 04:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 04:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is wrong style. Jelican9 (talk) 21:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Elly (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seal isn't official seal. This version is incorrect example in Presidency website. Kurmanbek (talk) 19:43, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File:Emblem of the Presidency of Turkey.svg is apparently the correct seal. howcheng {chat} 18:18, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion russavia (talk) 04:01, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:23, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:07, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete --Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. Fry1989 eh? 19:05, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I mentioned reasons are still valid. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No valid reason for deletion. russavia (talk) 04:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reproduction of a non-free photograph of Bled Island. Eleassar (t/p) 21:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped the photograph. --Sporti (talk) 05:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Apperantly fixed Natuur12 (talk) 19:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only the category is better (more images) Grashoofd (talk) 20:29, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: practically a single image gallery FASTILY 08:39, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scaled down version of File:Flag of Turkey.svg ~ Fry1989 eh? 18:45, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: files are not the same Jcb (talk) 07:10, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and implausible, or broken redirects. Also, This file has same file. Türk Süvarisi (talk) 08:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Tiny and unusable, Turkish flag is in SVG on Commons. Fry1989 eh? 19:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete In my opinion have to clean this picture Türk Süvarisi (talk) 09:16, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 06:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publicacion falsa Urjc 2014 (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom: useless photoshopping; unused. Lupo 17:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure what this is meant to depict. It's some lowres bitmap scribble embedded in an svg. DieBuche (talk) 09:40, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's supposed to look like "A dove carrying an olive-branch, with a star on its head"[5]. -- Innocent bystander (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry to create a poor SVG. I ask you whether you delete the current SVG, have you created.--今紫 (talk) 13:53, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:21, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you sabotage WP? Can't you at least substitute the old graphic it was made from, rather than turning it into a red link so it gets bot-deleted across all wikis? Come on, folks, if you're not going to do it right, don't do it at all. Leave it to someone who's willing to put in five minutes.

This kind of bureaucratic idiocy is why I never upload a graphic to Commons, and try to make sure that when someone insists on moving one, we keep a duplicate at WP-en where it's reasonably safe. Kwamikagami (talk) 19:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Natuur12. Yann (talk) 06:43, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OAlexander (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The UK threshold of originality is very low and as for example this has been afforded a UK copyright so would the Carcraft logo.

LGA talkedits 11:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It does not get much purer in terms of definition of "Textlogo" - maybe, then Category:Logos of companies of the United Kingdom should be renamed to something like Category:Logos for immediate deletion of the United Kingdom. Cheers, OAlexander (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of universities and colleges in Australia. OAlexander (talk) 17:08, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 06:45, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hey everyone it was wrong file image that i did upload in 2011 for this tunisian artist, would you please delete it Curtis Letterman (talk) 23:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:35, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of these photographs. These photographs were originally uploaded to WikiTravel and later transferred by bot to Commons. As the transferred files were missing appropriate descriptions and categorisation, I have uploaded new version of the photographs directly to Commons with proper descriptions, categorisation and geo-locations. The new version of photographs are as follows: File:Auro 082.jpg File:AgastyaLakeBadami33.JPG File:HutheesingJainTemple79.jpg File:IbrahimRozaBijapur.jpg File:Nehru Centre 11.jpg File:PondicherryFrenchWarMemorial.jpg.

Sanyambahga (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Deleted files were unused duplicates. Lupo 17:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This image would seem to have design elements that would take it beyond simple geometric shapes. It requires review by the community Natuur12 (talk) 09:17, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that doesn't mean a speedy deletion. I restored this file because of ticket:2014032610009091. This is pd-textlogo imo Natuur12 (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader added {{PD-textlogo}}, so I suppose that's what the company thinks. Yann (talk) 09:27, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The logo does qualify as text-logo according to int. trademark laws. This may be open to discussion but it does not address the actual problem: which is the correct licensing tag to be used on wikimedia that ensures fulfillment of Wikimedia rules and appropriate trademark protection? Uploading the company Logo from Apollo-Optik to wikimedia does not infringe any trademark or copyright laws - that's a fact. As Wikimedia makes no commercial use of it and no goods are signed, it is perfectly ok to be used for representation of a well-known brand open to the public domain. Copyright or trademark infringement would be implied by unlicensed commercial use, alteration or modification of the file. Hopefully someone can help along with the use of a correct licensing tag. I welcome any help. Seo411 10:16, 23 April 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as above. Yann (talk) 06:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted TouchWiz software and Twitter app —Mono 00:10, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry (talk) 02:27, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picturecollections need local sources Motopark (talk) 14:56, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand the phrasing of the nomination. Has the image been found elsewhere, or is it a copyvio or derived work of copyright material? -- (talk) 10:35, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A derived work of copyrighted content, obviously. iPhone splash screens are not {{PD-ineligible}}.    FDMS  4    10:43, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It is not that obvious, I recall the kickstarter project to upload high quality photographs of electrical goods to Commons. Defaulting to deletion based on a speculation of bad faith for new uploaders is not the norm for Commons. Could someone supply at least one link, if this nomination is meant to request deletion on the basis of being a copyright violation? -- (talk) 10:46, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So shall we probably ask User:Verduga Andres to confirm that he is the copyright holder of the icons of these four (at least three) mobile operating systems via OTRS?    FDMS  4    11:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't the usage count as de minimus, just like including a tiny, blurry copy of an advertisement in a city scape? The android probably comes under simple geometric shapes, the Blackberry is just text, and the third one from the right is likely simple enough to pass {{PD-font}}. The iPhone icons might have copyright if one could see them, but you can't. Keep. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:48, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Not when the focus lies on the blurry copy of the advertisemnt. There are several guidelines stated on COM:DM:
  • the file is in use to illustrate X →  no, but not in use at all
  • the file is categorised in relation to X →  no, but not categorised at all
  • X is referenced in the filename → yes, in a way (smartphone often rather refers to the software (which is smart) than to the hardware)
  • X is referenced in the description → yes, very clearly (sistemas operativos precisely refers to the copyrighted part)
  • X cannot be removed from the file without making the file useless → yes, because then the comparision would become useless
  • from other contextual clues (eg by comparison with a series of uploads by the same uploader) X is the reason for the creation of the file. → yes, the uploader has written an article about operating systems on his userpage
Also, the Blackberry text has a background as well, which makes the composition above TOO.    FDMS  4    20:12, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Textbook missing verifiable source information/evidence of permission, and a derivatives of non-free content. Will require COM:OTRS permission to be restored. -FASTILY 22:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Oman. This is a contemporary building completed in 2001. See the previous discussion at AN and VPC.

Jee 06:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Tempelhof Panorama.jpg shows a building in Germany and was just in the wrong cat. So I removed the deletion request here--Morray (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unfortunately no FOP in Oman. -- Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The mosque was completed in 2001, there is no freedom of panorama in Oman, thus permission from the architect is needed.

A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no Freedom of Panorama for monuments in Russia . Evil Russian (talk) 09:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator and COM:FOP#Russia. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 05:40, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per discussion Krd 17:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can not belive, that the Uploader from flickr is the oringinal photographer. I think, it is simply flickr whitewashing. Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The original photographer, Ted Potts, did indeed upload this photo on 4/23/14. As the subject's brother, he was a common photographer of the singer.(talk

So you claim to be Ted Potts? In any case, this photo is also published at www.aprilbyron.com. It's unclear to me whether that is indeed her own official site, but at the very least this would need a formal release sent to COM:OTRS. Otherwise we cannot keep it. Lupo 17:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete because although I'm willing to believe that Ted Potts is the photographer, that Flickr user is unlikely to be him unless he had a certain operation. The original Flickr license is invalid unless Ted Potts gets in touch with the OTteRS. Green Giant (talk) 22:39, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio Captain-tucker (talk) 19:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I guess this is {{PD-ineligible}} or {{PD-textlogo}}, but I'm not 100% sure. It's certainly not Own work if it's "official".    FDMS  4    19:45, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep because it is PD-ineligible on its own. The copyright exists when it is part of the album cover, which is hosted as fair-use on en-wiki. The image is certainly not own work though. @Ronayne94: needs to remove that from the summary and replace it with the source. Green Giant supports NonFreeWiki (talk) 05:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Borderline case but I'm goging for pd-ineligideble as well Natuur12 (talk) 15:00, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teemeah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See comments at ticket:2014041810005642 and at COM:UD discussion here. The OTRS ticket is not valid for these images; we do not yet have adequate permission for these images. Reupload was premature/not proper.

Эlcobbola talk 21:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry, you are being unreasonable here. There are two OTRS tickets proving the copyright status. Hantz Péter in the Hungarian language ticket DECLARED he owns copyright to these images, as he ordered and paid for these images, and obtained copyright ownership. What are we going to demand from them? A copy of the contract? The owner of the images declared, in multiple emails, that he owns copyright. On what basis do you say it's not true? Is it our job to assess whether a person, who specifically declares in an email, with full contact data, that he owns the copyright, says the truth or not? Are we an investigative bureu? Are we policemen? To the best of our knowledge this person owns the copyright. If he lies about this, that's HIS liability, we have the written proof of this. Teemeah (talk) 21:55, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you not bother to read my comments at the linked UD? You need to do a better job if you are to continue to be an OTRS agent. Эlcobbola talk 21:57, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. your link doesn't work, 2. that's not an answer to my questions. 3. don't teach me how to be an OTRS agent, have bene doing this long enough to know how to do it. you have not been in contact with this donator, I have. Teemeah (talk) 08:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1. It does work. 2. You didn't answer my question. 3. I'm not teaching you, I'm saying you're doing a rubbish job. Эlcobbola talk 17:01, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh really? While you were lecturing me on my shitty job, as part of the rubbish work I do, I talked to the Élő Erdély Egyesület, and they sent a CLEAR email this time. So could you kindly check ticket:2014011610015382 and close this case once and for all? Thank you in advance for actually doing something about this case other than lecture others on how to work. Maybe you could also take some lessons on how to communicate with donators. Because interestingly enough they had a lot to complain about you and not about me or Andrzej, who actually spent hours on solving this case, while you were graciously only deleting and lecturing from a high horse. Thank you. Teemeah (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS ticket apparently not valid FASTILY 04:12, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]