Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2014/03/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 29th, 2014
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Night photos of the Eiffel Tower are copyrighted Leoboudv (talk) 04:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: LOL withdrawn nom russavia (talk) 04:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 10:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted - copyvio - game screenshot
This file was deleted NOT because it is made of poor quality (that is no reason at all to delete a file) but rather because it's a screenshot of minecraft --D-Kuru (talk) 23:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement NawlinWiki (talk) 19:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by sockpuppet of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 19:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: (c) vio Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely improbable, looks like a bad reproduction of something. Jmabel ! talk 00:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all his uploads are photos of photos, I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion. No indication of notability, no credible educational scope otherwise. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, by Fastily with reason "out of scope". Taivo (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

new upload of flickr file licensed on flickr as CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0 Jarekt (talk) 04:10, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. This is a reason for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New file from flickr licensed there as CC-BY-NC-2.0 Jarekt (talk) 04:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. This is even reason for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely improbable, looks like a bad reproduction of something. Jmabel ! talk 06:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all his uploads are photos of photos, I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely improbable, looks like a bad reproduction of something. Jmabel ! talk 06:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all his uploads are photos of photos, I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" seems extremely improbable, looks like a bad reproduction of something. Jmabel ! talk 06:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all his uploads are photos of photos, I'll delete them all. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 06:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused art of non-notable artist, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, beautiful girl, but small photo (226×323) without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:09, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small strange image, maybe promotional. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, a man in military uniform smokes a cigaret. He claims to be notable, but his name is not given. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry; very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, bad composition. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:48, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotion account contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I do not see promotion, but I do not see notability either. Taivo (talk) 11:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright violation: "© Alejandro Buxo" in lower left corner. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, This can also be copyright violation, because there is no freedom of panorama in Russia. The sculpture is not identified. Taivo (talk) 13:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very poor quality (other photos of this monument in Category:Monument to Nicholas I of Russia, Saint Petersburg) Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:34, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:47, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; low image quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; too low resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; too low resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; too low resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, low quality. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 18:00, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

attack title, unused file NawlinWiki (talk) 19:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

attack title NawlinWiki (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: sorry, copyright violation. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The United States has no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures installed after 1977. Leoboudv (talk) 05:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Agreed.-GrapedApe (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file was used on userpage in en.wiki, but the user had no useful contributions there either. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, quite surprisingly, the "great businessman" and "chairman of 6th biggest company in the world" is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal file of user without other useful contribution. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 07:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is used in en.wiki on user page, but the user has no useful contributions there either. Taivo (talk) 10:57, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Latvia has no COM:FOP for modern 3D monuments and sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 08:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Yes, delete the file please. Monument was erected in 1935, author was died in 1986, so the monument is copyrighted. --Voll (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images quite identical : File:Ab plant 1883.jpg, File:Ab plant 1884.jpg, File:Ab plant 1885.jpg, File:Ab plant 1886.jpg. I plan to keep File:Ab plant 1883.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Yes, they all look quite the same but just because the auhtor should have selected one good image (instead of uploading like all of them) does not mean that you instantly can delete the other images --D-Kuru (talk) 23:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no reason to host almost-duplicates. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images quite identical : File:Ab plant 1883.jpg, File:Ab plant 1884.jpg, File:Ab plant 1885.jpg, File:Ab plant 1886.jpg. I plan to keep File:Ab plant 1883.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Yes, they all look quite the same but just because the auhtor should have selected one good image (instead of uploading like all of them) does not mean that you instantly can delete the other images --D-Kuru (talk) 23:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no reason to host almost-duplicates, but this photo has much worse composition (the plant is partly outside of photo). Taivo (talk) 11:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not properly uplodaed Yousuf johnny (talk) 11:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain why you want your upload deleted. I see no problem. Traumrune (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, nothing wrong with the photo, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images quite identical : File:Ab plant 1883.jpg, File:Ab plant 1884.jpg, File:Ab plant 1885.jpg, File:Ab plant 1886.jpg. I plan to keep File:Ab plant 1883.jpg Tangopaso (talk) 11:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose Yes, they all look quite the same but just because the auhtor should have selected one good image (instead of uploading like all of them) does not mean that you instantly can delete the other images --D-Kuru (talk) 23:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, no reason to host almost-duplicates. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ... an no license at all. JuTa 21:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 12:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Yann due to licensing problems. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; too small to be usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE; too small to be usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, too small to be usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:51, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, too small to be usable. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small picture in a white area, unknown person, see description Motopark (talk) 15:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Hedwig in Washington with reason "Mass deletion of copyrighted or inappropriate content". Taivo (talk) 14:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage picture, unknown pwersons, see description, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 15:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Hedwig in Washington with reason "Mass deletion of copyrighted or inappropriate content". Taivo (talk) 14:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some homepage picture, unknown pwersons, see description, out of project scope Motopark (talk) 15:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Hedwig in Washington with reason "Mass deletion of copyrighted or inappropriate content". Taivo (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Emblema Partido Agrario Laborista.png Sfs90 (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, by Túrelio with reason "Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file". Taivo (talk) 15:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, copyright violation as journal cover, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:23, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:21, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:13, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:11, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:08, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiero borrarla AnaGonzález 16:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the video is shared with a Creative Commons license, towards the end of the video, at minute 5:27, it is observed that is copyrighted by the BBC Studios. Also, the supposed author, hegenesisarchive.co.uk, publishes content protected by copyright; in addition, in the terms and conditions of same page indicates that uses material under Fair Use. That is, the license is unclear and appears not compatible. Gusama Romero (talk) 17:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that.  Support --Araujojoan96 (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, the uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution duplicate of File:Vischer - Topographia Ducatus Stiriae - 492 Wurmberg bei Pettau - Vurberk.jpg. Eleassar (t/p) 17:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by uploader Russavia. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

double image, there was yet File:VisualEditor applica modofiche.png Gabrasca (talk) 17:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. --Ricordisamoa 22:18, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 10:50, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain? Why don't you want it here? (And why did you upload it here?) -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:57, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 13:53, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:03, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Heute ein besseres Foto gemacht. Bin der Fotograf und Hochlader.
neues Foto
Reclus (talk) 21:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request, superseded with better photo. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Heute ein besseres Foto gemacht. Bin der Fotograf und Hochlader.
neues Foto
Reclus (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request, superseded with better photo. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Heute ein besseres Foto gemacht. Bin der Fotograf und Hochlader.
neues Foto
Reclus (talk) 21:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request, superseded with better photo. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: too dark. Eleassar (t/p) 21:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I considered cropping the dark part out, but decided, that the rest is not worth of preserving. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative or is there evidence that the shots on these cards were originally by Eddie? -- Túrelio (talk) 21:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of the image on the cover. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by uploader Russavia. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete per nom, blurry useless personal photo. Infrogmation (talk) 03:02, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, and ugly also. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Message via OTRS Ticket#2014032710022788 - Deletion request by photo's subject on privacy grounds  Ronhjones  (Talk) 22:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment What is the "privacy" problem? Photo taken on sidewalk of street of busy entertainment district, person shown was performing in public. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral: Without any further details, it seems like a courtesy deletion at most. If the subject is going out of his way to request it, then maybe the person has already had some problem involving the photo, but that's not always the case; sometimes the only "problem" is the subject's own opinion about the image. Why has this person, who was openly soliciting business on a public sidewalk in a major city, changed from wanting to be seen to wanting to not be seen? --Closeapple (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, no good reason is given. The depicted person performs in public, so no subject's consent is needed. Nothing strange or embarrassing happens on photo. The photo is big and has camera data. It is unused, but well usable. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt own work claim. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free sculpture; no FOP in Slovenia. Eleassar (t/p) 22:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, the sculpture is not de minimis, but main object. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image SamuelFreli (talk) 13:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

اشتباه در تايپ Nazarimanesh.reza (talk) 06:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BÜNYAMİN KOSOVA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, one of the files are used in tr.wiki in user page, but the user has no useful contributions there either. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David McAlvany (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotion account contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, McAlvany company and Don are not mentioned in en.wiki. David is mentioned once: he gave an interview for a strange documental film. I consider the photos out of project scope as unused photos about non-notable persons. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davidcampiti (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:01, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raptorsrecords (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files of user without other useful contribution except self-promotion.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Undertaker aliyev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans from unknown XX century sources, probably from local museum.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 09:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, they are all unused. Now are all the uploader's contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:11, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lynette christopher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploads of non-notable individual, not in use; see COM:SCOPE.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy, blatant copyright violations, photomontages using [1] [2] and others. Martin H. (talk) 12:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skiervikas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE: commons is not facebook. Personal files of user without other useful contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:DW Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, no metadata, uploader is a sockpuppet of en:User:SEFPRODUCTIONS Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uploader is a sockpuppet of en:User:SEFPRODUCTIONS Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Outside of COM:SCOPE. Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, no metadata, uploader is a sockpuppet of en:User:SEFPRODUCTIONS Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Also, possibly cyberbullying as well as privacy issues. The image was added to Rood haar ('red hair'). ErikvanB (talk) 04:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uploader is a sockpuppet of User:SEFPRODUCTIONS Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uploader is a sockpuppet of en:User:SEFPRODUCTIONS Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 04:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The description says: "looking great". Looks really great, the photo is big, approprietly licensed and has camera data, but ... what is it? Taivo (talk) 10:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted image from the source website with no indication that it is available under any sort of CC licensing. The359 (talk) 08:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the author of these photographs. These photographs were originally uploaded to WikiTravel and later transferred by bot to Commons. As the transferred files were missing appropriate descriptions and categorisation, I have uploaded new version of the photographs directly to Commons with proper descriptions, categorisation and geo-locations. The new version of photographs are as follows: File:Auro 082.jpg File:AgastyaLakeBadami33.JPG File:HutheesingJainTemple79.jpg File:IbrahimRozaBijapur.jpg File:Nehru Centre 11.jpg File:PondicherryFrenchWarMemorial.jpg.

Sanyambahga (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. Deleted files were unused duplicates. Lupo 17:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handcuffed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Problematic copyright issues, as described by Toyntanen, April 21, 2012 in http://chross.blogt.ch/forum/read.php?11,9900

24.134.38.87 08:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handcuffed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Referral to DR, for determination as to applicability of these to "educational" scope given COM:NOPENIS, and the exhibitionist nature of some of the other uploads of this user. It would be nice if Commons had a distinct policy of ONLY accepting images of certain subjects from accredited sources. There isn't an easy mechanism to request wholesale review of a contributors updates, but for this uploader, The expertise of others on Commons in reviewing the "sensitive" areas this uploader's media deals with would be greatly appreciated.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn per subsequent comments in related DR's and demonstrated lack of competence on the part of the nominator. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: Please do not renominate or re-open, without extensive consultation or specfic evidence backed concerns. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC) (Non Admin Closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handcuffed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Delete on privacy grounds (in many images a face is visible), unless uploader (or another experienced contributor) is able to provide further clarification as to documented participant consent for use of this media on Wikimedia Commons.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck out some images , per the disscussions in a related DR on review, an expert view on those remaining would be appreciated ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all.
It is disruptive to raise large mass deletion requests on speculation, then somehow expect other users to sort them out, and if we don't then expect them to be deleted because, maybe, there might be some sort of doubt vaguely related to policy.
With regard to Handcuffed, they have been uploading kinky or sexuality related photographs to Commons for 8 years, they have never been blocked. They are not a troublesome account, even though their chosen speciality of uploads will always feel problematic for some of our contributors; not for others. Because of the apparent controversial nature of their uploads, they have been targeted for deletion many times, looking back on at least one of the deletions, I find the reasoning faulty, and the "evidence" of copyright violations now missing, it is hard not to suspect that DRs on these sexuality related images tend to end up in deletion simply because their subject is sexuality rather than complying with the policies in the way that any other type of photograph would. I am not going to spend time digging deeper, but any allegation of copyright issues, or "privacy" issues needs to be analysed correctly before creating DRs and the evidence clearly included or logically and unambiguously expressed. Variations of "oh my, COM:PENIS" is not adequate, especially when some of these file have been happily hosted here for over 7 years.
With regard to these specific files, including the prior DR which is still open, files like File:This is me - Flickr - stnu.jpg which have been hosted for several years are good quality, useful for illustration or other educational reuse and are stable, they should be kept. Files like File:Red clothespins BDSM.jpg do not fail the PENIS test, as they are well beyond amateur dick pics, have high educational value by showing fringe or unusual sexuality, and in this case is not even sexually graphic or unnecessarily "naked"; I am not even sure Commons has much better illustrations of pegging without distracting backgrounds or focusing on genitals far more than this shot does.
I could do more research, pointing out which files are in use, and similar DRs for Handcuffed's uploads, and make the same explanation that "private" is not the same as "intrusive", but let's save on that volunteer time, please. Thanks -- (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn without prejudice to other contributors who may have different views. If you have a closing script Fæ I think we can apply a SNOWBALL clause here. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: Please do not renominate or re-open, without extensive consultation or specfic evidence backed concerns. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC) (Non Admin Closure)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 13:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope - see w:Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alibabarockz/Lesli Gooch campaign tactics stir voter anger and bewilderment. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abhasbajpai (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ajirdoank (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Also, the photo has no other source than "phone camer". Taivo (talk) 10:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Aagatawasthi (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading 3 photos. 2 of them are now deleted and the last is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abhaykumar295 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:27, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 13:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used by sockpuppets of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: Image was deleted by another admin. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it's not Benjamin Brame. Only the Current version is Benjamin Brame the French Lawyer Gampopa (talk) 15:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: studio portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's legend is messed up. There's a related comment on file talk page. Map itself seems to show Köppen climate classification, but the legend is a mix of bioms and Alisov's classification. Per talk page of a Wikipedia article from where this image was removed years ago, the uploader apparently has no intention to fix this. So there's no educational content and the image is hence out of scope. 90.190.114.172 18:13, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope as unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.nias.knaw.nl/fellows/former-fellows/year-group-1993-94/bourcier-d Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, promotional. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:58, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" 24.134.38.87 09:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is dubious, I suspect copyright violation Taivo (talk) 11:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope as unused personal photo Taivo (talk) 11:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from here. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 14:10, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And File:Goalscorer Bulgaria.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:49, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:34, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo from 1950-s or 1960-s, no date, own work is dubious Taivo (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is a copyrighted marvel character. Crazy runner (talk) 09:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [3]), no evidence for permission HaeB (talk) 19:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope as unused logo of non-notable musician (no mention in en.wiki) Taivo (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, the uploader's last remaining contribution. The uploader Jcstoco is blocked forever for uploading copyvios and as this image is poorly sourced, I do not rule out copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

how to prove the copyright status without a source? 24.134.38.87 10:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Please look, how the people are dressed and how the car looks like. Surely the photo is made before 1955 and so in public domain (look license). Taivo (talk) 11:14, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Source was given on file as "historical society". File dated 1931 in description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:49, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work 24.134.38.87 10:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:25, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope as unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution Taivo (talk) 12:09, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional image ♫♫ Leitoxx ♪♪ 01:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is used in es.wiki. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Not in use anymore. JurgenNL (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [4]), no evidence for permission HaeB (talk) 19:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:01, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source clearly states the image is courtesy of a private citizen and not a work of the LOC. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:02, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, unused low-resolution image of unknown person. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems as scanned of a book, not an own work Ezarateesteban 20:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. -- Túrelio (talk) 22:04, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:scope McZusatz (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of probably copyrighted works Taivo (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not see the point in having two photos of the same object at slightly different angles. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RO_MM_Larga_16.jpg Asaspor (talk) 10:31, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That is exact the point, a three hundred old century portal carved in wood. Important are the details, someone has made the effort to take those photos in places which are very difficult to reach.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 20:16, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image location slightly different, creates different moods between the two images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:21, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work /St1995 20:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:14, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentUploading to Commons granted an irrevocable license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims given the low quality and nature of the photo. LX (talk, contribs) 18:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:57, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is of inferior quality and adds no real value. Asaspor (talk) 10:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been edited and improved. It was dark, that village is difficult to reach, so that the options were limited. That wooden church had no other image on the internet before that photos were taken and loaded.Țetcu Mircea Rareș (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am not for deleting images, but let me note that File:RO MM Larga 219.jpg is taken from the same angle and is lighter. --Oguszt (talk) 20:43, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The lighter image is in use in the project and is better quality. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:18, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work 1930 isn't plausible Be..anyone (talk) 23:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add for deletion due to same reason:

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aetia84 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of fan art. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:52, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Csilber (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:50, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Criss Willoughe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Corey Wagar

[edit]

Corey Wagar (talk · contribs) has not done anything in Wikipedia except self-promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading three pictures (one now deleted), which are used nowhere except on the userpage. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:32, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Byellowbrick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:48, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:52, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:56, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Onefootman

[edit]

Onefootman (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpage in en.wiki and uploading six self-promotional files, which are used nowhere except the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work is not plausible Be..anyone (talk) 23:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[duplicate listing snipped] Listing for deletion once is sufficient, repeat listings of the same thing are not useful. Why don't you want it here? (And why did you upload it here?) -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iryna.marushchak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos and certificates. No evidence of permissions(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:42, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dereli.intsb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Indiatimesnews (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:35, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sheetal joshi72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable or unlikely authorship claims based on the nature of the images, the low/inconsistent resolutions, the missing/inconsistent metadata, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:24, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luiseduardo83 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Reproductions of copyrighted artworks of (as indicated) en:Luis Álvarez de Lugo (1923—), Venezuelan painter and sculptor. Permission needed. Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alvarezdelugo bolivar.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 10:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:26, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zuleikis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monirul2004 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:51, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used by sockpuppet of banned User:SEFPRODUCTIONS on en.wiki NawlinWiki (talk) 01:52, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per discussions at COM:VP#License review for Korean images and User talk:Hym411#Images of http://toto1024.tistory.com/.

Revicomplaint? 07:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My initial vote is to  Delete on a few considerations; first, that there was indeed a CC-BY icon at the bottom of the page possibly indicating a free license (example: ) but that is probably just a feature of the hosting site tistory.com; second, that there was also a "notice" at the bottom, perhaps a copyright license, indicating "COPYRIGHT 2013, TOTO1024 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED." Perhaps the notice however, 간단한 규칙(수정), is what Puramyun31 (talk · contribs) considers "modified", but we would not know on which page the CC-BY or the "modified" ALL RIGHTS RESERVED license came first. Therefore, I am afraid under the precautionary principle they must be deleted. However, I might change to keep if someone presents a compelling argument. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 10:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete When the author said NO definitely and there's doubt about validity of the license, I think there's no reason to keep them. --Leedkmn (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
my understanding of the notice is Toto released his images under CC-BY until June 8, 2013 first, but Changed his licensing to CC-BY-NC-ND since June 11, 2013 with the 'modified' notice (images are OK released until June 8 2013, Not OK released since June 11, 2013). However, maybe I support this deletion if more users support deletion as countesy. --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep - the owner of a website like this won't put…
<license rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-fr/">
	<permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Reproduction"/>
	<permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Distribution"/>
	<requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Notice"/>
	<requires rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/Attribution"/>
	<permits rdf:resource="http://web.resource.org/cc/DerivativeWorks"/>
</License>
…on his pages without knowing what it means. That's as of today, not 2013. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Tistory has feature to add CC license with two clicks, so it is possible to add license on his page without knowing what it means. Revicomplaint? 03:12, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I guess maybe Toto had added CC-BY license on his page with knowing what it means until June 8 2013, but now he have forgotten it. --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:33, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I suggest that we inform Toto the nature of the license and the CC-BY licensing of his images at the bottom of each posted page before June 8, 2013 to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding (I think that's a good idea when Toto find his work(s) in the internet, he could understand that the work(s) is/are legitimately used under CC-BY license without unnecessary dispute, not only used by us but also used by other websites), but once the idea was rejected by Hym411. --Puramyun31 (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment there are a bunch of other files this may affect, too... My Korean is non-existent, but for example File:Park_Hyo-Shin18.jpg comes from here, where the only license information I can find is a <div> called "tistoryCclLayer" that contains this background image. Storkk (talk) 09:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is quite clear to me that the copyrightowner didnnot wanted to release his file under a free license. keeping them sounds like a we got you know you're screwed and I highly doubt that this will held up in court. It is not even clear what he releases he only placed a cc-symbol not syaing that he releases something or anything like that. Could be done in error. So I am deleting this files as a countesy discission and under the com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 14:23, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. It appears User:Nikosgranturismogt and User:Aina2008 (who uploaded File:Hery Rajaonarimampianina.jpg) are both claiming to be official portrait photographers for Madagascar's government. I'm not particularly inclined to believe either of them. LX (talk, contribs) 18:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Netcopyright. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Russia. Lymantria (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This ca. 1916 German image is of course not the uploader's own work as claimed by the license tag. It could be in the public domain because its author (the photographer) is dead for at least 70 years, but just as well he could have lived another 40 years. There is no documented research about who the author is. As long as we don't know that, the image should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Murals are subject to copyright. No FoP in France.
Converted by me to DR, as it might be discussed whether this could fall under de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:23, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment But who is the architect? Maybe he is not 70 years dead yet? Taivo (talk) 11:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Murals are subject to copyright. No FoP in France.
Converted by me to DR, as this might go by de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment But who is architect of the house? Maybe he is not yet 70 years dead? Taivo (talk) 10:42, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [5]), no evidence for permission HaeB (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

says Fuente: www.pilar.gov.ar = Source: www.pilar.gov.ar uploader has multiple copyvios Ezarateesteban 20:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Usually colors are explained on file page, not file itself. Maybe the file is out of project scope. There exists File:Bandera de Córdoba.svg. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Faux logo, in its declaration of principles the party doesn't mention the letters on their symbol Sfs90 (talk) 23:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False claim of ownership, the file appears in a forum post dated 16-05-11 (file name 15x65cg.jpg). Underlying lk (talk) 23:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Coats of arms of municipalities are not own work. Brazilian municipality symbols are in public domain, if published before 1983, but as here is 1985 in coat of arms, this is obviously not the case. {{PD-BrazilGov}} is not applicable. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Msrn1967 as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: No educational value
Converted by me to DR, as image has been on Commons for a while. As it is unused it could be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is big and has EXIF data. The rationale "no educational value" is clearly false. I am a bit worried about unnaturally small penis, but this is not a big mistake. Taivo (talk) 10:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No consensus for deletion Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. It appears User:Aina2008 and User:Nikosgranturismogt (who uploaded File:Hery Rajaonarimampianina BY Nikosgranturismo5.jpg) are both claiming to be official portrait photographers for Madagascar's government. I'm not particularly inclined to believe either of them. LX (talk, contribs) 18:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not a real flag, no educational purpose Ezarateesteban 20:53, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The file is used in multiple times in es.wiki, so it is in project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: okey Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alex Spade as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not 2D-art. Not PD-Art.
Converted by me to DR, as the image already on Commons since 2007, which merits some discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No prove that the uploader is the copyright holder The Banner (talk) 11:26, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The proof that it is my poster (made entirely by me) is here on my website, where the poster is featured digitally and included in a photo of it printed out at my own gallery exhibition. What kind of proof would you like me to submit? Bbrownsomething 8:31, 29 March 2014

You can contact the OTRS-team to take the necessary steps to prove that you and the copyright-holder are identical. They can tell you how to do that. The Banner (talk) 17:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per above Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted artwork (on the cutout) shown Gazebo (talk) 07:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The stated source of the file (Army Times Publishing Company) is a private company and thus the file is not PD as a work of the US Fed Govt as claimed. Mercy11 (talk) 03:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader states: "This is a photo of my great-grandmother with my grandfather as a little boy." That means: this is not own work as claimed. I suspect copyright violation. The photo can nevertheless be free from copyright due to age, but approximate date and photographer's name are needed. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think this logo is still PD. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Murals are subject to copyright. No FoP in France.
Converted by me to DR, as this might go by de minimis. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment But who is architect of the house? Maybe he is not 70 years dead yet? Taivo (talk) 10:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Diogo Sergio as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Critério de eliminação por não estar em uso,desde dezembro de 2007.
Converted by me to DR, as this should go through a regular DR, not a speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

--Diogo Sergio (talk) 19:58, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resuming: Diogo Sergio is not the author. He took the photo from http://saofernando.blogspot.de/2011/11/programacao-dos-3-ultimos-dias-da-festa.html (2011, by "Junior de Pelega") = http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_JTJ5HJFKVeg/TOVF_MQxCUI/AAAAAAAAAYg/sO3hmXnpbIk/s1600/Nossa Senhora do Patrocino02.jpg and uploaded it here on Commons in 2012. Without permission by "Junior de Pelega"  Delete. @Diogo Sergio: Obrigado por ter esclarecido a origem da foto. Gunnex (talk) 10:05, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos of parties are not own work. The logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader gives no proof of that the Dioceses has released the image under a free license; in fact, he states that they retain the copyright. I see no proof this is free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Romania.    FDMS  4    15:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Aj236s

[edit]

Aj236s (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpages in Commons and en.wiki and uploading a self-portrait, which is used nowhere except on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The is claimed as PD as the uploader took the image, but as a two dimensional image his is a derivative image and the rights belong to the original rifhts holder - most likely Gary Davis/The World Service Authority. This is therefore incorrectly licensed and it is not clear that this work has a license compatible with Commons. Spartaz (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Allanmhcr

[edit]

Allanmhcr (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Commons except userpage and uploading a self-portrait, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope.

The file was once presented for deletion by The Photographer and it was kept. This was because nobody realized, that Allanmhcr has no useful edits. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Memorial was opened in August 25, 2006 and author uk:Гайдамака Анатолій Васильович is alive. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Героям бою під Крутами.jpg. Perhaps some of listed could be kept because the monument is little part of image but they are useless unless for illustrating the monument.

BaseSat (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would consider the monument de minimis in File:Rolling stock at the Kruty Heroes Memorial.JPG.    FDMS  4    17:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Меморіал пам'яті героїв Крут. Вандалізм.jpg does not picture the monument, only a vandalized stone — NickK (talk) 19:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't seem to be just some random stones. It's some human made structure which has an author as well. --BaseSat (talk) 14:45, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not everything that has an author is copyrighted, it also has to meet TOO.    FDMS  4    14:50, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And even more: Ukrainian copyright law has an exemption for current events, allowing to reproduce objects pictured during such events (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2013/12#Ukrainian copyright law current events provision). This image definitely falls under such exemption even if we consider this stone as copyrighted — NickK (talk) 23:31, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Only a few images violate those FOP regulations. It would be wrong to delete them all. --High Contrast (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sure the decision must be made per each file. --BaseSat (talk) 14:45, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Save the File:Меморіал пам'яті героїв Крут. Вандалізм.jpg! This file illustrates the act of vandalism, not the monument! --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:09, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But vandalized thing made of bricks seems to be part of the monument as well for me. --BaseSat (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it is visible, but not good (intensively painted). The most important the fact that the monument is not a main object of the illustration. I think it might be saved. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:49, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept some deleted some. If anyone disagrees feel free to nominate them again since those files should have a sepperate DR Natuur12 (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work (crop) of a photograph still under copyright. The original photograph was taken by Jacques Irisson in septembrer 1944 (and not in 1943), according to that source. The photographer Jacques Irisson was still in activity in 1947, see the caption of the photograph of René Char in that other page. No mention of a specific release in the public domain. Myrabella (talk) 13:20, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Yesuky

[edit]

Yesuky (talk · contribs) has not done anything in Wikipedia except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading two photos. One of them is used in the sandbox and the other nowhere. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The own work-claim is doubtful, because the photo is taken 124 years ago. See also the talk page of the uploader, he has a history with these kind of photos. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I suppose, that it is quite safe to tag it {{PD-old}}. This gives the photographer 53 years from photographing to die and the photo is still in public domain due to age. Taivo (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I disagree with Taivo that this file is old enough to assume that this file is pd. There is no proper sourcing either. So I delete this one under the com:PCP Natuur12 (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work as claimed and surpasses threshold of originality Taivo (talk) 12:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dollheart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Adversting account contribution.

Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I do not agree. The files are used in zh.wiki and therefore in scope. The first (QD) is cosplay and so clear keep. The second photo has facebook filename and so maybe copyrighted (Facebook claims copyright to all his files). The doll on photo is copyrighted, but maybe the uploader has right to publish it under free license anyway? The third file – does it surpass threshold of originality? But maybe the uploader has really right to publish it under free license? Only the last file is clearly promotional, but even this file is used. Taivo (talk) 12:38, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: two kept two. Evidence of permission is missing for the second and the fourth file Natuur12 (talk) 17:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Eco ant

[edit]

Eco ant (talk · contribs) made a userpage and uploaded a picture, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. His/her only other edit was reverted. All his/her activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As stated in Ticket#2013072010000246 in the OTRS system, the third-party photographer of this image never authorized it for public display. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:59, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the copyright on this image has expired. Underlying lk (talk) 23:28, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Romania.    FDMS  4    15:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source ( http://wccftech.com/amd-fm2-socket-kaveri-apu-compatible-trinity-richland/ ) says at the very bottom: "This work by WCCF (Pvt) Ltd. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available on the Terms and Conditions page. Read more: http://wccftech.com/amd-fm2-socket-kaveri-apu-compatible-trinity-richland/#ixzz2xL19Pca1"
CC-BY-NC-SA content is not allowed on Commons, but I can't visit the Terms and Conditions page (maybe some images are excluded) and may the licence has been changed over time from a BY-SA to BY-NC-SA. D-Kuru (talk) 08:24, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:46, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected copyright violation: freedom panorama in Brazil applies only for works permanently situated in public place. This work is apparently in public place, but permanent? Taivo (talk) 12:02, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There is no FOP for temporarely instalations in Brazil Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:AadityaBShah

[edit]

AadityaBShah (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia except userpages in Commons and en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere except on the userpages. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Latvia has no Freedom of Panorama for modern sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 08:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Monument was erected in 1896, so the monument in the public domain. It looks so fresh because it is the exact copy of the damaged original. --Voll (talk) 19:28, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Okey Natuur12 (talk) 16:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Romanian has no COM:FOP for modern 3D sculptures. Leoboudv (talk) 05:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 17:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Still under copyright. This photograph was taken by Jacques Irisson in septembrer 1944 (and not in 1943), according to that source. The photographer Jacques Irisson was still in activity in 1947, see the caption of the photograph of René Char in that other page. No mention of a specific release in the public domain. Myrabella (talk) 13:18, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Harrison Lebnan

[edit]

Harrison Lebnan (talk · contribs) has not made anything in Wikipedia except userpages in Commons and en.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used nowhere except the userpages:

All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Romania.    FDMS  4    15:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:55, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Mohamed Warsame Abdi

[edit]

Mohamed Warsame Abdi (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia except two self-promotional userpages (both in en.wiki) and uploading two personal photos, which are used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Banbanner

[edit]

Banbanner (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine, but they are all modern (post-WWII) sculptures and memorials.

I looked all his other uploads also, but they are either too simple for copyright or not enough copyrightable details are seen. Taivo (talk) 13:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:David fth

[edit]

David fth (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Commons except userpage and uploading a file, which is used nowhere except on the userpage. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:BaronBeartooth

[edit]

BaronBeartooth (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Commons except userpage and uploading two personal photos. One of them is used on the userpage and the other nowhere. All his activity in Commons is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 16:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marco valeriani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi my name is Marco Valeriani, i think i can keep the file gianniserra.jpg becouse is a copyright free photo, Mr. Gianni Serra himself gave me the picture to publish on Wikipedia. Best regards --Marco valeriani (talk) 16:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marco valeriani (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos and movie screenshots. No evidence of permission(a).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by User:Ellin Beltz. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 06:10, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the confusion–I sized the image down to what I thought was the correct file size (at 220 pixels across). The image is useful, in that it provides a photo of the article subject.

What can I do correct this situation?

This is the first pic I've uploaded, and I thought I was doing it correctly.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Left Coast Arts (talk • contribs) 19:09, 3. Apr. 2014‎ (UTC 02:00)


Kept: Uploader clarified that it is really his own work. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 06:15, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from http://blogdeheraldica.blogspot.com.es/2008/06/merito-militar.html
Converted by me to DR, as this cannot be the original source, because the image has lower resolution than our version. I have found the image in the same resolution at http://www.josealimia-requete.com/capitan.html, however, the page is undated. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:26, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File was released at http://www.josealimia-requete.com/capitan.html before being uploaded to Commons (2010/08/21). See 2009/01/31 cache at archive.org: [6] LMLM (talk) 07:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely copyright violation. ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 06:08, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images should be evaluated; costumes and cosplay can be unclear as far as copyright goes but actual models or statues of fictional characters or actual persons are likely to be copyrighted.

Note: The File:Bruce_Lee_figure_at_Comic-Con_2010.jpg image may well be a Bruce Lee mannequin of sorts as opposed to a cosplayer; it is not clear as to whether the same applies to the woman in the File:Brian Pulido at SDCC 2010.jpg and File:Brian_Pulido_at_SDCC_2010_2.jpg images.

Gazebo (talk) 08:03, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Question. "but actual models or statues of fictional characters or actual persons are likely to be copyrighted". What is the status of the Madame Tussaud figures, then? There are a lot of photos on Commons that people took in the museums of the wax figures. I think the same should apply for the Bruce Lee wax figure at Comic Con. Otherwise all wax figures should be nominated for deletion as well. Teemeah (talk) 10:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Geoff Peterson.jpg -- does not involve Cosplay of any kind (though CosPlay images are in fact usually allowed on Commons), copyright status does not appear to be different than a photograph of a Roomba... AnonMoos (talk) 17:12, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It's the actual robot "Geoff Peterson" as seen on the show, not a model or statue. Dcxf (talk) 04:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept, per discussion. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:22, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe that the previous DR was closed incorrectly. All of the images listed above and four that I have added show copyrighted characters or creations that have copyrights as sculpture. None of them are utilitarian and therefore they must be treated exactly as if they were sculptures of humans, animals, or abstract objects.

To say that the robot "Geoff Peterson" is the actual robot does not change the fact that it is itself a copyrighted sculpture.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:27, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At least part of these photos show cosplay, and we have tons of it: Category:Cosplay. Do you want to delete all cosplay photos, hah? --Sigwald (talk) 15:15, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would delete any image that shows a copyrighted sculpture or other creation. That includes most masks, but not humans wearing costumes that do not include masks. Note also that it does not matter whether the sculpture is original or a copy of a cartoon or movie character -- either way it has a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of making any sweeping generalizations about Jim's intentions to images not on this list, I worked only with the nominated images. The following are my votes:

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go with you on those I struck out above -- I simply assumed the woman was wax. I might argue about whether the fake chin actually has its own copyright, but I'll pass it for now.
There's no reason why the Bruce Lee figure does not have a copyright -- the license you quote covers only the image, not the sculpture. The Tusken masks are not utilitarian and therefore have a copyright -- perhaps belonging to Star Wars, but also perhaps belonging to the creator of these -- either way they are covered. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:49, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I don't disagree with you on the Bruce Lee statue, merely noting how it was licensed at flickr. The "Tusken" raiders outfits are homemade, there are videos online showing how to do it. Even so, those three in the outfits are human as you can see from the badges. The question was (as I understood it), which of these are statues and which are cosplay. The Tuskens are cosplay because they are real people inside the outfits which they most likely made. 50.45.171.194 15:43, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid you don't understand the rules. Cosplay is not exempt from any copyright rule which might apply. Any mask, whether it is cosplay or not, has a copyright. This is true whether or not it is copied from a copyrighted mask. We know that these are Star Wars' Tuskens, but even if they were created out of the imagination of the three humans inside them, they would have a copyright. Without permission from the copyright holder, we cannot keep them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that's the case. Clothing as being worn by people is almost always "utilitarian" or "functional" under United States copyright law. A copyrighted design (a Picasso painting or whatever) might be printed on the clothing, which is a different thing, but clothing items insofar as they serve their purpose of covering the body are not generally copyrightable. AnonMoos (talk) 23:07, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you read the linked items from this:
"The 1991 policy decision on costumes and masks by the Copyright Office appears to still be in effect, and although it is only advisory, it is a good indication of where courts tend to fall on this issue. It says that masks are definitely copyrightable, and that costumes may be copyrightable in certain circumstances (or at least certain features of the costume might be copyrightable), subject to a complicated legal analysis to determine whether the aesthetic aspects of the costume are "separable" from the costume's role as an article of clothing (the utilitarian aspects). Some information on the separability test can be found at [7]." [from Commons:Image_casebook#Costumes_and_cosplay]
While a mask that protects one from the sun or the cold would certainly be utilitarian, the Tusken masks are far from useful -- in fact, with their narrow range of vision, they are just the opposite. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Geoff Peterson -- Unfortunately, the "delete Geoff Peterson" arguments seem to turn on subtle points of metaphysics or philosophy, rather than what is most directly relevant to United States copyright law... AnonMoos (talk) 17:12, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I see no subtlety at all -- it is a sculpture of a skull. All sculptures have copyrights. Why is this any different from any other sculpture?.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The question "When is a robot not a robot?" seems to me to be on a level with such famous philosophical conundrums as "When is a horse not a horse?"... -- AnonMoos (talk) 23:24, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it is not a robot, as it is entirely manually controlled, but even it were, so what? Since it is not utilitarian, and, in particular, the skull is not utilitarian, the skull has a copyright just like any other sculpture. Robots are not exempt from copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:19, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: except when there is opposition. I am not sure you can get a copyright on a skull. Yann (talk) 12:56, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 15:28, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:28, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]