Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2011/02/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
It is very likely a copyright violation —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 00:29, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Speedily deleted as a copyright violation by User:Martin H. (non-admin closure). Jujutacular talk 13:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Copyvio Sofree 01:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted, Copyright Metrobus. JDavid (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
{{PD-old}} cannot apply if no author is given. –Tryphon☂ 17:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- No signatures are present on the images, which were published by newspapers a hundred years ago. I suppose the author should be called anonymous, rather than unknown, and the images entered PD after 70 years. --Jonund (talk) 19:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- If the author is really unknown, then {{PD-EU-Anonymous}} or {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} are the licenses you're looking for. –Tryphon☂ 22:53, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'll change the licenses. --Jonund (talk) 10:04, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept. Both files now have a valid license. (non-admin closure) –Tryphon☂ 10:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Appears to be professionally taken photo, no proof that uploader is the copyright holder Corvus cornix (talk) 01:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - Likely copyvio: [1]. Jujutacular talk 14:01, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio Julo (talk) 22:13, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
wrong image Everestsh (talk) 16:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Martin H. (talk) 22:50, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Vanity photo. Used in now deleted out of scope article. No foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 01:18, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Seems to be out of scope. Jujutacular talk 14:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale!» 09:01, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Repeat of discussion from December. I deleted file couple of days ago, but is being uploaded time and again. Lukasz Lukomski (talk) 01:31, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: fourth time, warned user not to do it again Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The selected license template is not fulfilled: 1) Not a photo 2) the creator of the film is a living person, therefore the film enjoys the copyright protection of the new law as described in the (wrongly) selected template. Martin H. (talk) 02:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Is there any other license that applies here? I wasn't sure which one fits better. The image is very important for multiple articles. Thanks--Codrin.B (talk) 02:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- The film is not public domain, so no: there is no license tag on Commons for this. --Martin H. (talk) 02:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- I understand. I thought a scene would be ok for academic purposes and as a poster. What about this official movie poster or other posters? Would this be ok? I've seen that other movies have posters, but some (or all?) only host it on Wikipedia instead of Commons?! Thanks.
- In Wikipedia under fair use, not on Commone because we dont have fair use here. --Martin H. (talk) 20:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Thanks!--Codrin.B (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- In Wikipedia under fair use, not on Commone because we dont have fair use here. --Martin H. (talk) 20:37, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
- I understand. I thought a scene would be ok for academic purposes and as a poster. What about this official movie poster or other posters? Would this be ok? I've seen that other movies have posters, but some (or all?) only host it on Wikipedia instead of Commons?! Thanks.
- The film is not public domain, so no: there is no license tag on Commons for this. --Martin H. (talk) 02:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Jujutacular talk 14:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
No license, no source. It dosn't look as a PD-Self Banfield - Amenazas aquí 02:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Unused and out of COM:SCOPE. Non-notable band. Uploader's only contribution. Maybe a copyright violation too. Wknight94 talk 02:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
This was supposed to be deleted with Commons:Deletion requests/Dallas Wylie Rob (talk) 04:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Non free movie poster Kiran Gopi (talk) 04:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
well i took it from a website, well am a newbie could you please elaborate what is a free movie poster. and yeah i want to clarify that poster that we get from any websites will not be listed under free posters--Sandeep.s (talk) 19:10, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: This poster has a copyright, therefore we say that it is "non-free". Most movie posters will have a copyright, but the rules depend on where they were first published. See Licensing Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:21, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
this is property of Texas state, not a Federal image TCO (talk) 06:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- I researched this a little. First, the site the uploader referred to as the source is a state site, not a federal one. Second Texas maintains a strict warning on their copyright. Third, original uploader is not here. Was able to find this image used at two federal sites, one crediting it to Texas, the other with no comment.
- I looked into getting a donation request from Texas, but they want the request in writing (as it's commercial use) and I will not bother. Did find a couple alternate free images that are truly federal. Not as good as this one, but uploading the best illustrative one.TCO (talk) 06:09, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Note File:TCO collage attempt dos (bigger turtle).jpg and File:Cropped TCO collage attempt uno.jpg are derivative works that need to get axed too. TCO (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:22, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Can find no indication this was really Federal image TCO (talk) 06:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- The listed Federal site does not use this image. I also looked at several documents on their site (species preservation plans, Powerpoints, etc. where they would want to use the image, but did not (but did for other species). Only Federal picture of this species is a drawing. A while ago, this image was up on AL state website, but now it is not even there.TCO (talk) 06:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete Sad to say, as the original uploader, it's worse than that even. The details are here in this conversation in my Wikipedia talk page archive. As it's been three weeks since I wrote to them without a reply forthcoming, I regret to say that I have to agree with the deletion. If it turns out to be kosher later, it can always be re-uploaded. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 07:04, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks man. Definitely did not want you to take offense. I'm writing a few people who have pics on the web and will try to get a replacement donated.TCO (talk) 08:33, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment http://www.savetheredbelly.org/ -- Common Good (talk) 20:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep I found the rights holder and got permission and added all details to the image file page.TCO (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep Changing my mind due to TCO's hard leg-work tracking down the rights holder and securing permission. Nice save! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 06:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Keep - OTRS permission received --Sreejith K (talk) 12:09, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Correct file exist Dark Eagle (talk) 10:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The other one does not have a clear superiority over the nominated image. No harm in having more than one version available. —Quibik (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted (show/hide) 14:47, 26 February 2011 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:LVA Ogre COA.svg" (Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Coat of Arms of Ogre.svg) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log) abf «Cabale!» 09:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Correct file exist Dark Eagle (talk) 10:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Keep The other one does not have a clear superiority over the nominated image. No harm in having more than one version available. —Quibik (talk) 15:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted (show/hide) 14:47, 26 February 2011 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:LVA Ogre flag.svg" (Exact or scaled down duplicate: File:Flag of Ogre.svg) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log) abf «Cabale!» 09:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama does not apply to artworks, see Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_States. DrKiernan (talk) 13:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Corporate logo, copyright violation of http://www.iucab.com/en/index.php; cannot be users own work unless the user is the corporation itself Holyoke, mass (talk) 13:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Corporate logo, copyright violation of http://www.iucab.com/en/index.php; cannot be users own work unless the user is the corporation itself Holyoke, mass (talk) 13:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted doll. –Tryphon☂ 13:41, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Unclear context and description. Not useful. Uploader appears to have left. DrKiernan (talk) 13:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Personal photo -- Commons is not Flickr Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:22, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- File:Rektor_lnau.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- File:GERB_LNAU.png (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
All rights reserved. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 15:08, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:32, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, not sure on rule though: being a relief, it is not necessarily a three-dimensional work. Edelseider (talk) 15:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC) Other file concerned:
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: Yes, low relief is 3D, as it requires more creativity that a coin, which we also classify as 3D. The source allows only limited reuse. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:34, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Because the company I haven´t company authorization Mnovella (talk) 16:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted uploader requested deletion of unused file abf «Cabale!» 09:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
and File:Quincy Senior High.jpg. Unlikely to by own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:49, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
C. 1910 photograph by Ferdinand Urbahns (1863-1944) according to BPK. Not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 16:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - unless proof can be found that it was published before 1923, it can't be transferred to en.wiki either. Parsecboy (talk) 11:46, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
C. 1915 photograph by Ferdinand Urbahns (1863-1944) according to PBK. Not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
C. 1915 photograph by Ferdinand Urbahns (1863-1944) according to BPK. Not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 16:40, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
C. 1910 photograph by Ferdinand Urbahns (1863-1944) according to BPK. Not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 16:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - The source (New York Times) said "Photo © by Brown Bros.", but I accept it was wrong. William Avery (talk) 23:45, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
http://www.vesti.az/news.php?id=67968 , http://www.vesti.az/photos/Bakida hebsxana 120211.jpg Dinamik (talk) 16:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:56, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
The claimed author is the write of the book, not the photograher. Comparing the image to this BPK image it was possibly created by Ferdinand Urbahns (1863-1944). We can only keep the image if the author is anonymous, I dont see enough evidence for this. Martin H. (talk) 16:48, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Ferdinand Urbahns, who operated the Atelier für künstlerische Photographie in Kiel, died 1944, this photo is not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, copyvio, Category:Undelete in 2015. MKFI (talk) 21:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Restored. Green Giant (talk) 17:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
Out of scope. –Tryphon☂ 16:54, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Ferdinand Urbahns, photographer from Kiel who made many portraits of navy people, died 1944. This photo is not public domain. Martin H. (talk) 16:55, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:57, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Out of scope. –Tryphon☂ 17:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale!» 09:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Seems eligible for copyright to me, and might be out of scope anyway. –Tryphon☂ 17:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. abf «Cabale!» 09:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
imagen antigua Myole (talk) 13:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
above TOO Basvb (talk) 12:27, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
Artist Ramadan Ramadani (1944–2005), no evidence of permission Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted " (show/hide) 10:06, 23 February 2011 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:Ramadani surealism.jpg" (Fair use is not allowed on Commons) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log)" abf «Cabale!» 09:12, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Used in a now deleted out of scope vanity article. Out of scope, no foreseeable use. FASTILY (TALK) 20:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
bad quality, unusable, not used, probably not own work, not other upload by this user Oxam Hartog 21:49, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
unused low-quailty (pixelated), superceded by File:Trans-2-Buten.svg among others DMacks (talk) 23:17, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom now superceded by other pictures. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Per above. Leyo 13:59, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Low quality illustration, seems to serve no particular purpose Bitmapped (talk) 02:15, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Admrboltz (talk) 02:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom as well. Imzadi 1979 → 02:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Route11 (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - poorly drawn diagram of a simple concept that doesn't need a diagram. A photo of a divided highway - of which the Commons has many - does the job. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 22:23, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I don't think I need to say why. --Rschen7754 (talk) 22:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I've driven well out of my way to take pictures of dual carriageways. Little did I know that I simply could have used MS Paint and made one. –Fredddie™ 22:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Do we need such a diagram? It looks pretty badly drawn as well. --PCB 01:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Route11(talk)(UTC) you may delete this picture if you want
Deleted per discussion. abf «Cabale!» 09:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Seems to be replaced by File:Taxa de aceleracao GRE(2).png by uploader. Leyo 16:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted Ed (Edgar181) 21:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Seems to be replaced by File:Taxa de aceleracao GDE(2).png by uploader. --Leyo 16:19, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted Ed (Edgar181) 21:18, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Due to the low quality of the picture and the small watermark that can seen on the bottom of the picture. I don't think that the User is really the author of the picture. It looks like a miniature saved and uploaded. Duch.seb (talk) 20:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- request admin review. It appears that all uploads by User:Mechnikef fall in the same league - case for a summary deletion. NVO (talk) 00:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: (show/hide) 14:58, 1 March 2011 Jameslwoodward (talk | contribs | block) deleted "File:Li-2 4.jpg" (Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Li-2 4.jpg) (view/restore) (global usage; delinker log) abf «Cabale!» 10:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
EXIF shows photographer which is not the uploader. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:25, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Why are you sure the real name of User:Advancingdemocracy is not Ganbayar Urtnasan? Ask him first before start Deletion Request, he was active few times in English Wikipedia. Julo (talk) 22:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
EXIF photographer is not uploader -- permission? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:27, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nomn russavia (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
EXIF photographer is not uploader Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:30, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
EXIF photographer is not uploader Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 15:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
This is either a copyvio or, if as stated, it is created by the uploader, then it is out of scope as personal art. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: as per nom russavia (talk) 15:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
apparently copy-pasted with no signs of permission from the source ssr (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Нет. На самом деле указанный источник работает по GNU FDL 1.2. Когда я копировал оттуда фотку она выглядела так, затем её там видимо обновили. Что же касается самого сайта-источника — им заведует «начальник управления Интернет-ресурсов администрации губернатора»[2], у него я так понимаю есть доступ к таким фоткам.--const_st 19:42, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted by User:EugeneZelenko (non-admin closure). Jujutacular talk 13:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Artist Ramadan Ramadani (1944–2005), no evidence of permission Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:42, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
I have all the rights James because I am his son and I own the paintings by testament. What proof do you want ? (Jetonr (talk) 15:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC))
- I am inclined to believe Jetonr. OTRS won't help, because short of sending a copy of the probated will, he cannot prove that he is Ramadani's heir. What do others think -- or am I forgetting some other way we have for this situation? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I left a note about COM:OTRS at the uploader's talk page. I think that is still the preferred procedure so that "we" will have something identifying on file in the event of a law suit. (I may have made that up though). Wknight94 talk 01:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted, lacks suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 21:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Artist Ramadan Ramadani (1944–2005), no evidence of permission Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
[copied the following from Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:Albanian elements.jpg]
- I am his son and I am granted the right by his testament to represent all his work. (Jetonr (talk) 08:43, 23 February 2011 (UTC))
- Nobody will read this here (well, except me). You should copy that to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Albanian elements.jpg. As we have no evidence about your identity, you should sent your above claim, including your legal name and some other identification to [email protected]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
[end of copy]
- Comment I left a note about COM:OTRS at the uploader's talk page. Wknight94 talk 01:28, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted, lacks suitable permission. Kameraad Pjotr 20:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
It's a derivative work of the copyright violation at File:Dinosaur_comic_panel.png Enric Naval (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment The original source file (File:Early dinosaur comic.png) is still available. Uploaded by User:Quantz (Ryan North/qwantz.com) in 2004. -- Common Good (talk) 20:07, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment It seems to me quite likely that the original uploader is indeed the author of the webcomic. However, I believe OTRS permission may need to be obtained. Jujutacular talk 00:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Kept: as long as nobody nominates the original comic, there is no need the delete the DW Jcb (talk) 09:22, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Artist Ramadan Ramadani (1944–2005), no evidence of permission Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:43, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I left a note about COM:OTRS at the uploader's talk page. Wknight94 talk 01:30, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted Jcb (talk) 09:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
All images here are probable deletions as COM:DW, so the gallery must also be a problem. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: a gallery itself will not be a problem, but being empty right now it can be deleted as regular upkeep Jcb (talk) 09:25, 2 April 2011 (UTC)