Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2010/08/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Flickr washing, cf. copyright under http://www.swiss-image.ch/index.php?id=121 Fernrohr (talk) 08:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. The World Economic Forum has all necessary contracts to release this under cc-by-sa. I placed the {{WEF}} on the image and corrected the attribution the copyright holder specified on Flickr. The correct term here is not 'flickrwashing' but 'flickrvio' - this is however not a flickrvio as correspondence in the past with the WEF has shown. Martin H. (talk) 09:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
(motivazione per la cancellazione)L'immagine non rispetta i suoi relativi copyright, richiedo di cancellarla. --Silnogard (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Nonsense request to delete Template:Delete/it. --Martin H. (talk) 14:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
unused WiiCommon (talk) 00:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: "Unused" is not sufficient reason to delete. Not that I'm necessarily saying the image is useful, but we need a reason to delete. This is particularly odd because this is a recent upload, and it's the uploader requesting deletion. Was this uploaded by mistake? Or what's the story? - Jmabel ! talk 05:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:ProjWiiAufbau.jpg -- Common Good (talk) 19:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Duplicate with incorrect name. Correct copy exist. It is my mistake. George Chernilevsky talk 08:08, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Butko: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Wikimeetup_in_Vinnytsia_01_08_2009_G1.jpg: Duplicate with incorrect name. Correct copy exist
I was just using this to test on wikipedia. Spiderfart (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 19:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
No picture uploaded Nsaa (talk) 20:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. File page without media -- Common Good (talk) 19:49, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
wrong file name A13ean (talk) 22:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Exact or scaled-down duplicate: File:Boy Surface-animation-small.gif -- Common Good (talk) 19:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Logo is too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}, and there isn't enough evidence to show the uploader was entitled to license it to the Commons. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Clearly not PD-text, license is randomly chosen DieBuche (talk) 01:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
copyvio, the title on flickr says "Expressen webb image. Enhanced", and all of the pictures on Nymans photo stream seem to be screenshots. Prolineserver (talk) 20:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- I hope the rest of the images in Category:Photographs by Bengt Nyman is clean. --Prolineserver (talk) 20:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Well, as I suspected, the photo is too good to be free :( So, this is Bengt Nyman's fault? Surtsicna (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme: Copyright violation
infame 197.0.99.202 00:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Used in several Wikipedias, and a well-made photo. "infame" is not an English word, and without context I can only guess that someone is writing in Italian and making a moral objection to the fact that this is a picture of a penis. Sorry, whoever you are, but a certain number of such pictures are entirely within scope. - Jmabel ! talk 05:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- speedy keep. In use, therefore in scope. "Idontlikeit" and the like are not valid deletion rationales. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:45, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep Educational and useful image. Luispihormiguero (talk) 12:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Out of scope. The Evil IP address (talk) 14:17, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Mbdortmund (talk) 02:03, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
maybe a copyright violation Historischer Hampelmann (talk) 14:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Delete Clearly a copyright violation, http://www.missamericancontinent.com/home/content/view/248/76/. Everything the uploader Kirbyn Joel Berrios (talk · contribs) uploaded so far has wrong "Own work" claims. --Martin H. (talk) 15:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Masur (talk) 16:16, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Only text file with promotional character GeorgHH • talk 12:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Out of COM:SCOPE. SV1XV (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
unused private image - out of scope Santosga (talk) 19:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted' Out of COM:SCOPE. SV1XV (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Is this a notable person? Looks like simple self promotion. GeorgHH • talk 19:55, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Out of COM:SCOPE. SV1XV (talk) 07:23, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
unused personal logo - out of scope Santosga (talk) 20:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted Out of COM:SCOPE. SV1XV (talk) 07:24, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Is this a personality right problem, the flickr album is now hidden from the public, which could mean that someone was concerned about it? DieBuche (talk) 20:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed, besides: out of scope. --Yikrazuul (talk) 15:38, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I really don't see any issue about this picture, please remenber that licences are irrevocable, so if the author after changed idea and hidden the album, that's irrelevant and negligible. About the presumed "out of scope", if this picture is out of scope, are out of scope and/or redundant about one third of the pictures uploaded on Commons. Jacopo Werther (talk) 18:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well, and because we have so many unnecessary pics we should keep everything else? May I then upload my out-of-scope images because we have anyway so many out-of-scope-images? This is no argument! --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- I wrote "if" this picture is out of scope not it's out of scope. Out of scope is your personal opinion, I respect it but I don't share it. This deletion request started about presumed personality right problem (that in my opinion is non-existent) e this is the really argument. What's your opinion about it? Jacopo Werther (talk) 17:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Can you be sure that this woman wants to be seen here on commons and in public? Does she know that someone has taken a pic? I am asking that because we donna know it (just because someone has added it to FlickR prooves nothing). 2nd: If there are no issues concerning the privacy, what should we use the pic for? Illustrating the beach, blond girls? Grosso mode we can delete it. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- This shot was taken in a public place, so i think there aren't issues concerning the privacy. The pic is really nice and beautiful and not vulgar. Why don't you like it? Life is also this! Jacopo Werther (talk) 20:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Can you be sure that this woman wants to be seen here on commons and in public? Does she know that someone has taken a pic? I am asking that because we donna know it (just because someone has added it to FlickR prooves nothing). 2nd: If there are no issues concerning the privacy, what should we use the pic for? Illustrating the beach, blond girls? Grosso mode we can delete it. --Yikrazuul (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- I wrote "if" this picture is out of scope not it's out of scope. Out of scope is your personal opinion, I respect it but I don't share it. This deletion request started about presumed personality right problem (that in my opinion is non-existent) e this is the really argument. What's your opinion about it? Jacopo Werther (talk) 17:43, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- Well, and because we have so many unnecessary pics we should keep everything else? May I then upload my out-of-scope images because we have anyway so many out-of-scope-images? This is no argument! --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Comment Head could be cropped out, it still will be a fine picture. Trycatch (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason(s) for deletion. --FAEP (talk) 23:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Info File:Beautiful Blonde at the beach.jpg shows the same woman. --Leyo 15:16, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Licenses are irrevocable. No other problem with this image. SV1XV (talk) 07:28, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
porno 92.161.48.254 17:57, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- Porno? Are you sure?!? Jacopo Werther (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
speedy kept Julo (talk) 21:37, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Dal tipo di sabbia non credo proprio si tratti della spiaggia di San Remo e mi sentirei ragionevolmente di escludere che la persona fotografata sia una donna. The type of sand do not think this is the beach of San Remo and I feel reasonably rule out that the person photographed is a woman. --Ligabo (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
Empty. Was one entry. We have Category:Video game designers and Category:Video game programmers --Kungfuman (talk) 10:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Common Good (talk) 20:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
The image looks like it was pulled from an official website, and there is insufficient indication that the photograph was taken by the uploader. Also, I'm not sure what is going on, but according to the file history the uploader has uploaded a whole series of different photographs under the same name, all on the same day within a few minutes of each other. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 10:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete you are correct, it is from this webpage [1]. - Theornamentalist (talk) 12:36, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- listed it under SD, as well as the others that appeared on the page it linked to - Theornamentalist (talk) 12:42, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- What's SD? — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 16:16, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion - Theornamentalist (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. I note the image has been deleted. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 20:05, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Speedy deletion - Theornamentalist (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Sv1xv: Copyright violation: internet harvesting
Copyvio, see previous watermark DieBuche (talk) 00:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete unless OTRS is forthcoming. - Jmabel ! talk 05:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. - Theornamentalist (talk) 13:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Derivative works of statues by Emile Gilioli who died in 1977. No COM:FOP#France and not nearly COM:PD#France. Wknight94 talk 02:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Gilioli17.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Gilioli18.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Gilioli19.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Gilioli20.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
I'll hijack Wknight94's nomination as it saves me from some work. The below pictures have a similar problem, same location so no FOP and works of François Stahly (1911-2006) so not PD. Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- File:Stahly28.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stahly29.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Stahly30.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- That's fine. I am going through them all grouped by sculptor. Probably unnecessary but a bit safer. Wknight94 talk 02:51, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- I'll add one more and then I'm off to bed. Works by Isabelle Walberg (1917-1990), again no FOP and not PD. Angus McLellan (Talk) 02:55, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:33, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Also File:Greco11.jpg and File:Greco12.jpg. Derivative works of statues by Emilio Greco who died in 1995. No COM:FOP#France and not nearly COM:PD#France. Wknight94 talk 02:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Also File:Ramseyer09.jpg. Derivative works of statues by André Ramseyer who died in 2007. No COM:FOP#France and not nearly COM:PD#France. Wknight94 talk 02:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Also File:Couturier14.jpg and File:Couturier15.jpg. Derivative works of statues by Robert Couturier who died in 2008 (at age 103!!). No COM:FOP#France and not nearly COM:PD#France. Wknight94 talk 02:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Also File:D'Haëse22.jpg and File:D'Haëse23.jpg. Derivative works of statues by Roel D'Haese who died in 1996. No COM:FOP#France and not nearly COM:PD#France. Wknight94 talk 02:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Also File:Loth25.jpg. Derivative works of statues by Wilhelm Loth who died in 1993. No COM:FOP#France and not nearly COM:PD#France. Wknight94 talk 03:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Derivative work of relief by Emilio Greco who died in 1995. No COM:FOP#Italy and not nearly COM:PD#Italy. Wknight94 talk 03:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Orvieto Central bronze door.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto017.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto029.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto030.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto031.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto032.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto033.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto034.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto035.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto036.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto037.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- File:Orvieto038.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
- Unfortunately, all images are clearly in violation of copyright. JoJan (talk) 16:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Derivative work of statue by Emilio Greco who died in 1995. No COM:FOP#Italy and not nearly COM:PD#Italy. Wknight94 talk 04:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Derivative work of statue by Emilio Greco who died in 1995. No COM:FOP#Italy and not nearly COM:PD#Italy. Wknight94 talk 04:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
seems more appropriate for your average myspace page, not really usable in an educational context DieBuche (talk) 08:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Personal picture, out of scope Gyrostat (talk) 20:15, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. out of project scope -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:51, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
most probably rather uploaded to impress/shock users than for encyclopedic purposes Ben4Wiki (talk) 09:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Not free, model or concept art. --GdGourou - °o° - Talk to me 10:51, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Dieses Bild steht vom Urheber aus nicht mehr zur Verfügung und soll gelöscht werden. 77.4.38.195 10:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep License is irrevocable! -- 194.48.128.75 12:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. It was originally designed by Ingimundur Sveinsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 10:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. It was originally designed by Ingimundur Sveinsson. He lives. --Fingalo (talk) 11:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
In the same line my images from Halgrims church were deleted and I do as well vote against such an insane request. Andreas Tille (talk) 11:08, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --JD554 (talk) 11:47, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Derivative works of artwork by François Stahly who died in 2006. No COM:FOP#France and not nearly COM:PD#France. Wknight94 talk 11:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
No COM:FOP#France and not in COM:PD#France (please check the latter - that section confuses me). Wknight94 talk 12:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Doubtful own work. Even if really own work, the source for the center picture is not given. Wknight94 talk 12:10, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Doubtful own work. Even if really own work, the source for the main focus picture is not given. Wknight94 talk 12:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
The photograph of Mary Baker Eddy on this website page is currently protected by United States Copyright Law, having first been copyrighted in 1929 and registered in the U.S. Copyright Office (registration no. A16151 and renewed in 1957 under no. R189984 relating to the book The Life of Mary Baker Eddy by Sibyl Wilbur). This information comes from the copyright holders themselves, through OTRS ticket number 2010080510004891. I'm going to transfer it to en-Wikipedia and host it under fair use there. --Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 12:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
bad quality (poor size/resolution) Ben4Wiki (talk) 12:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:17, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. It was originally designed by Prof Fritz Höger. He died 1949. --Fingalo (talk) 12:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
nonsense picture used in a vandalism page Timneu22 (talk) 12:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. It was originally designed by Prof Fritz Höger. He died 1949. --Fingalo (talk) 13:01, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. It was originally designed by Prof Fritz Höger. He died 1949. --Fingalo (talk) 13:07, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. It was originally designed by Guðjón Samúelsson. He died 1950. --Fingalo (talk) 13:20, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:35, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Restored, then deleted again as a duplicate of File:Iceland - Black And White - Cross - Akureyri - Akureyrarkirkja - Clock (4890602462).jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:07, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
bad quality (poor size/resolution) Ben4Wiki (talk) 13:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artist's death. It was ca 1940 originally designed by J. Wippel & Co. in Exeter. --Fingalo (talk) 13:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artist's death. It was ca 1940 originally designed by J. Wippel & Co. in Exeter. --Fingalo (talk) 13:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland The organ is from 1992. --Fingalo (talk) 14:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artists's death per COM:FOP#Iceland The organ is from 1992. --Fingalo (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete unless permission from the creator for the free licenses is produced. Hekerui (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the artists's death per COM:FOP#Iceland The organ is from 1992. --Fingalo (talk) 14:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
unused photo of musician with no notability/vanity and possible copyvio as decided here es:Juan Alonso Villalvilla Santosga (talk) 16:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, non-notable and unused. - Theornamentalist (talk) 12:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
redundant, better new floor plan including collegeate. -- by July 28, 2010 Symposiarch
- I reposted this including the file name in the header. Where is the replacement, please? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- File:Liebfrauenkirche Mainz Stiftsgebäude.jpg perhaps --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- correct it is file Liebfrauenkirche Mainz Stiftsgebäude.jpg --Symposiarch (talk) 12:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- File:Liebfrauenkirche Mainz Stiftsgebäude.jpg perhaps --Mbdortmund (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:10, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
there is a cropped version.--27.109.252.117 18:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Nonsense nomination. Not a valid reason for deletion. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
same version --27.109.252.117 18:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Nonsense nomination. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:46, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Original research being used to promote POV in Wikipedia articles Yworo (talk) 19:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Original research is not prohibited on Commons. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:27, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Not relevant to any education article and does not conform to the standards of wikipedia maps. RJEvans (talk) 22:41, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep I think that this image definitely has potential. Although difficult to update every time she travels while in office, when her term ends and the image is appropriately updated, it could certainly be useful. - Theornamentalist (talk) 12:08, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland The church is consecreted 1988. --Fingalo (talk) 18:04, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward: Per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Breidholtskirkja.JPG
Replaced by File:Logo of the National Projects of Russia.svg, the source is the same so attribution path is not broken. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 16:27, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. NEURO ⇌ 17:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Unaesthetic typeface, replaced by File:Selenoxide_pyrolysis.png. Please apologise. PigAndPepper (talk) 18:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep I don't understand this DR. The two images are more or less identical (although I note that the "C" is misplaced in "78°C" in the SVG). Policy is that we prefer the SVG, so why are we asked to delete it? Why not fix the SVG and delete the PNG? Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:17, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Should be easy to fix. Jim is right, SVG generally is better suited for this type of image. If you have questions, you'll find help at Commons:WikiProject Chemistry. --NEURO ⇌ 17:33, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Fake in making and there is nil street like this.--27.109.252.117 18:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. I don't see any reason, why this should be deleted. --NEURO ⇌ 17:36, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Possible flickrwashing. Only 2 files in the flickr user photostream (both uploaded to Commons), flickr account created just a few days before the upload to Commons. While the other file is a certain copyvio (copied from [2]), I could not find the origin of this one. Trycatch (talk) 03:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. ZooFari 04:12, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
request from the uploader: please remove, original can be seen at en.wikipedia which copy I wanted to use Williwaw (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Keep I don't understand this DR. Policy both here and at WP:EN suggests that this image should be hosted here, not at WP:EN. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:04, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Geagea (talk) 22:27, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
Juliet Landau
[edit]Juliet Landau (by way of her agency) has stated her dislike about the current photographs of her in articles. Via OTRS 2010071110010231, she has donated new images and requested the removal of the current images. In my opinion the files:
- File:Juliet Landau 2004 1.jpg
- File:Juliet Landau 2004 2.jpg
- File:Juliet Landau opening water bottle 2004.jpg
as low quality photographs with suitable replacements in for instance File:Juliet Landau 6.jpg are deletable.
is a low quality version and can be replaced by File:091107_snap_02.jpg. Though I don't think the "snap 02" image is deletable, I do suggest that per BLP subjects request the image is replaced in articles by the more recent File:Juliet Landau 6.jpg image.
Regards, TheDJ (talk), assisting User:Ironholds in this matter.
- Keep at least File:091107 snap 02.jpg if there is no copyright problem. Trycatch (talk) 11:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Keep all. If a subject doesn't like free photos that are in use, then this is an example of how one can be proactive in the matter and donate higher quality images. However, this does not mean that we need to delete images that a subject may not like. They are still valid for use on all of our projects, and their potential use is up to editorial discretion. --russavia (talk) 10:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, I have deleted one image, as it is clearly an exact scaled down copy of File:091107_snap_02.jpg. --russavia (talk) 10:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. The first of these is in use in nine places on seven wikis. It is not up to us (or Ms. Landau) to tell the various language editors what photos to use. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 13:41, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The tail is a bit to short. Also, the palms of the hand should face against each other, not backwards. The body may is a bit to small, and the head a bit to large. The neck sholuld be shorter. Conty (talk) 12:59, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Keep in use --Simonxag (talk) 01:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
Kept. In use on the Spanish Wikipedia. --Eusebius (talk) 08:47, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
To short tail, and proportianlly wrong forelmibs, neck and eyes. The eyes should not be pronated. Conty (talk) 13:21, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
This illustration are too inaccurate to be on wikipedia; The tail are too short, and the neck too long. The legs are too straight, and should not have knee caps. Also, the forelimbs are too thin, and the hands dould not be pronated. At last, most scientists would say it should have feathers. Conty (talk) 19:09, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Still in use on WP:ES. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:24, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
No proof of free license. pd-self license at Wikipedia plainly false. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 23:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete sadly. The uploader and the real author are clearly different people here. No permission is evident either. MGA73 is trying to contact the real author though but has not had success thus far. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:22, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Why you so sure that "The uploader and the real author are clearly different people". The same user name in Panoramio and wiki - Sascha Drenth. Geagea (talk) 21:29, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- The user name is en:User:Pafcool2 no proof this user is Sascha Drenth. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 21:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. my mistake. Geagea (talk) 21:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- The user name is en:User:Pafcool2 no proof this user is Sascha Drenth. -Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 21:53, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:58, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Wrong PD-old license. It's published and created 1939. That's surely not the date of death of the unknown author. Saibo (Δ) 14:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- The name and the date of death of the photographer is unknown. Please delete the photo. --Suse (talk) 19:22, 5 August 2010 (UTC) (← uploader of this file --Saibo (Δ) 20:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC))
{{PD-anon-70}} is used now. It should be okay now with this license tag. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 13:27, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
unused WiiCommon (talk) 00:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: "Unused" is not sufficient reason to delete. Not that I'm necessarily saying the image is useful, but we need a reason to delete. This is particularly odd because this is a recent upload, and it's the uploader requesting deletion. Was this uploaded by mistake? Or what's the story? - Jmabel ! talk 05:05, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Image is only free for non-commercial use until 70 years following the architect's death per COM:FOP#Iceland. --Fingalo (talk) 10:26, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Can this image be "saved" for the purposes of illustrating English Wikipedia at least? Can it be uploaded there? --Mareklug talk 21:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes Fingalo (talk) 18:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:24, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Image too large and detailed to create a thumbnail. RJEvans (talk) 22:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Generally images like this are kept for archival purposes (and sometime developers will create support for large TIFFs and PNGs). But why you've converted source JPG to PNG? Trycatch (talk) 11:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Delete: Was a duplicate of this file too, (now modified). Rehman( ) 14:32, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:26, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Images of User:Jose0313188
[edit]Copyvio of the Flint Group text and logo
- File:Excessive.JPG
- File:Color_variations.JPG
- File:Bleed.jpg
- File:Float.JPG
- File:Foaming.JPG
- File:Blushing.JPG
- File:Halo trouble.JPG
This one is a little different, as he/she swapped out the offending image, but the replacement does us little good:
Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Please include File:Dirty.JPG as well. Wknight94 talk 15:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Comment Why you nominating the last one? Alakasam (talk) 23:17, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete, copyviolation and a kind of advertisement for this company Cholo Aleman (talk) 13:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete all except the new version of File:Troubleshoting adhesion.jpg. The old version should go. It seems the user was just using Commons and en.wp as storage space for a work presentation. I deleted the en.wp user page. Wknight94 talk 15:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Deleted all except the new version of File:Troubleshoting adhesion.jpg. Jafeluv (talk) 02:57, 6 December 2010 (UTC)