Commons:Deletion requests/2024/12/22

21 December 2024

23 December 2024

Deletion requests on 22 December 2024

December 22

File:Nur Nobi - Moijdipur Senbag Noakhali - Businessmen Dhaka Karwan Bazar.jpg

Some businessman 186.173.97.160 01:03, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:East Abdullahpur Baytullah Jame Masjid, East Abdullahpur, 12No Kutubpur, 8No Word, Begumganj, Noakhali, Bangladesh.jpg

Collage requires source and license for each and every photo. 186.173.97.160 01:06, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tianmu Lake Landscape Garden Resort.jpg

作者要求删除，上传版本出错颐园居 (talk) 01:34, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rihanna Fenty 2024 02.jpg

copyvio - uploaded to VOGUE Taiwan, other deletion requests with regards to photos from there ended in delete because the videos can also be found without CC license on the main vogue channel and it is unclear whether whoever uploads them to VOGUE Taiwan has permission to release under a different license. link to video see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Emma Watson 2023 head and shoulders 1.jpg TheLoyalOrder (talk) 02:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete concur - it's an ongoing issue with the screen images from the VOGUE Taiwan YouTube account. Would also add the following to this deletion nomination:

Diddykong1130 (talk) 07:27, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fotomosaico Metrô de BH.jpg

Copyright infringement of Estado de Minas/Diários Associados/Larissa Figueiredo https://www.em.com.br/gerais/2024/07/6896586-obras-praticamente-dobram-intervalo-entre-trens-no-metro-de-bh.html Isaac daniel (talk) 03:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Por mais que a imagem do referido link tenha sido usada como "molde" para gerar a imagem da File em discussão por meio de IA, as imagens são claramente diferentes, bastando a comparação visual de uma com a outra. A utilização de imagens como base para geração de outras por meio de IA não infringe direitos autorais, desde que não haja flagrante condição de plágio.

O que pode ter acontecido nesse caso é que algum "resquício" de metadado da imagem piloto tenha sido acidentalmente transferido para a imagem gerada no momento da rodagem do programa. Vou verificar o que ocorreu e caso tenha acontecido de fato, vou providenciar a correção e o upload de uma nova versão da file sem as informações de copyright. Johnnynstein (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is exactly the same image by Larissa Figueiredo, photographer for an important local newspaper, which has only been inverted horizontally and changed the tone. The same image has since been removed for the same reason on 27 November 2024 (UTC) Isaac daniel (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tom Lehrer lyrics, All Is Well.pdf

CV: This song was published in 1935, and French copyright only expired at the end of 2023, so US copyright lasts until 2031. (w:fr:Tout va très bien madame la marquise (chanson)) —CalendulaAsteraceae (talk • contribs) 04:13, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Mad Doctor (1933) colorized closing title.png

Wrong license tags and this flim is a part of 1990's American Film Technologies colorized edition. May I possibly suggest that account should be Indefinite blocks. ConcededBear657 (talk) 01:58, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this image is clearly under the threshold of originality because the extremely simple text shown here cannot be copyrighted and a single color neither. The New Foxy (talk) 05:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@D. Benjamin Miller What about for this Photo?

ConcededBear657 (talk) 01:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RP88 What about for this Photo? ConcededBear657 (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:54, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Mad Doctor (1933) colorized closing title.png

"burlap" style title first known use is 1937 short Hawaiian Holiday, this is reissue title ConcededBear657 (talk) 05:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep The nomination is completely nonsense because the image is made of very simple words with a very simple background, the image is obviously below the threshold of originality and the @ConcededBear657 user's attitude is one of unjustified harassment. The New Foxy (talk) 16:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're sophism! can you see every Night of the Living Dead (1968)[1] [2] colorized version screenshot on Wikimedia Commons? The Mad Doctor (1933) colorized version is released alter 1, March 1989 (early 1990s) [3] ConcededBear657 (talk) 05:10, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're arguments are sophism, nonsense and stupidity, how are the words The End against a simple background copyrightable? The New Foxy (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Letter from Bruce Lee to Taky Kimura.jpg

this web indicate Bruce Lee Enterprises claim this letter copyright https://artsandculture.google.com/asset/a-letter-to-taky-kimura-from-bruce-lee-bruce-lee/XgE0hGkcSCJq-Q?hl=en ConcededBear657 (talk) 06:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takushi Izawa.jpg and File:Takushi Izawa (cropped).jpg

この画像は2022年のQuizKnockの記事^[1]に使用されており、厚生労働省が作者でないことは容易に想像ができます。その上で出典元^[2]になっているページの利用条件を見ると、以下のようになっております。

３）第三者の権利を侵害しないようにしてください
ア　コンテンツの中には、第三者（国以外の者をいいます。以下同じ。）が著作権その他の権利を有している場合があります。第三者が著作権を有しているコンテンツや、第三者が著作権以外の権利（例：写真における肖像権、パブリシティ権等）を有しているコンテンツについては、特に権利処理済であることが明示されているものを除き、利用者の責任で、当該第三者から利用の許諾を得てください。
イ　コンテンツのうち第三者が権利を有しているものについては、出典の表記等によって第三者が権利を有していることを直接的又は間接的に表示・示唆しているものもありますが、明確に第三者が権利を有している部分の特定・明示等を行っていないものもあります。利用する場合は利用者の責任において確認してください。
ウ　第三者が著作権等を有しているコンテンツであっても、著作権法上認められている引用など、著作権者等の許諾なしに利用できる場合があります。
— 厚生労働省, in: 利用規約・リンク・著作権等

これらのことから、権利元に許可を取ってない場合にはこの画像はウィキメディア・コモンズに不適切であると思われます。 -Biáng (talk) 07:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Likely to be a third-party work, not a government work. It doesn't help that the source published a future event, not an event report (meaning less chance for a government employee to take a photo of a participant of the said event). whym (talk) 14:19, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Der Milankovic-Zyklus – Neigung der Erdachse (CC BY 4.0) .webm

This file was initially tagged by ZDF Terra X Redaktion as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Bitte Datei löschen, ich bin der Uploader! Fehler im Video enthalten. Ein korrigiertes Video kann nicht erstellt werden --ZDF Terra X Redaktion (talk) 10:05, 20 December 2024 (UTC) Needs more explanation on what the problem is. GPSLeo (talk) 08:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sehe gerade, wenn die Datei bleibt, müsste vor der Dateiendung das Leerzeichen entfernt werden. Sieht sonst doof aus. Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Einfach als neue Version hochladen. Kein valider Grund. Unklar was mit "Ein korrigiertes Video kann nicht erstellt werden" gemeint ist und das scheint falsch zu sein. Prototyperspective (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo Red LinuxClick full.png

This file was initially tagged by WikiBayer as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: License ? Could be PD-textlogo. GPSLeo (talk) 08:12, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jan Baestaens 1994.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Sjoerddebruin as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Krd 08:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cup Noodle Curry 2024-12.jpg

Because it is Logo Robbie942094 (talk) 09:29, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

~~Speedy keep~~ It's a logo that's specifically cited as uncopyrightable on the COM:TOO Japan page. "Because it is Logo" is not a deletion reason! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep Per Ikan Kekek 茅野ふたば (talk) 14:43, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The image on the lid might be COM:DM, but might not be...see COM:PACKAGING. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I take your point. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:54, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cougar MRAP Romania.jpg

No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 09:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Already on the website under "conditions of use". Alin2808 (talk) 09:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unknown suspect in the Brian Thompson Murder Investigation.webp

COM:Redundant, There are currently four files of this CCTV-tootage in different sizes and qualities, where he is smiling at the hotel reception. This one is the smallest and also has an unpleasant blurring effect. Bad quality. איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 09:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blay Fabrice.png

User with very few edits and photo not own work. 186.173.97.160 12:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:President Obama and his Wicker Park constituents (3216544400).jpg

copyright-protected content (cut-out photo) not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 12:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Charley Rabbit McVeigh.jpg

copyrighted photo like all other uploads from this user RedPatch (talk) 13:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is from when he played for the Blackhawks, which was before 1929 and thus in the public domain in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Browne.Cecil.img582 - Copy (2).jpg

copyrighted photo like all other uploads from this user RedPatch (talk) 13:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This is from when he played for the Blackhawks, which was before 1929 and thus in the public domain in the US. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:41, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baldwin.Doug.jpg

copyrighted photo like all other uploads from this user RedPatch (talk) 13:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Extremist symbol in Russia

Templates to warn people from anti democratic laws in authoritarian countries should not exist. See also the discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Zionist symbol. GPSLeo (talk) 13:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nazi symbols are not allowed in a lot of European countries, including Germany. Calling this an "anti democratic law" sounds quite weird from a European perspective. We have several templates that warn people of potential legal consequences regarding the usage of certain symbols. How is this template different from {{Nazi symbol}} or {{Communist symbol}}? I can see how it would be redundant given that {{Nazi symbol}} exists, but the provided deletion rationale sounds rather wrong to me. Wiki is not censored. Nakonana (talk) 02:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nakonana Полностью поддерживаю Вас на 100 процентов, поскольку необходимо учитывать интересы и российских пользователей, а их немало. Ведь к примеру символика украинских нацбатов и экстремистских организаций находится под запретом в России. Такой же аналогичный шаблон есть для палестинской символики, ограниченной к использованию в Израиле и Германии. В обозримом будущем такой же шаблон планирую и для Беларуси. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:34, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that when we create such templates for laws in every authoritarian country we would end up with a large list of warnings under every file. People from these countries know what could bring them to prison, we do not need to warn them. GPSLeo (talk) 22:32, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then what about the other aforementioned templates? Nazi symbols are seen quite critically in all of Europe; it doesn't matter whether they are used by Third Reich Nazis or by modern neo-Nazis, the symbols are equally illegal. If the Russian law would prohibit some absurd stuff (like unicorn symbols for example), I'd understand the deletion request, but here it seems to concern symbols that are prohibited in dozens of democratic countries. Nakonana (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But for that we have {{Nazi symbol}} for more than one decade. And I think unicorn symbols might be banned in Russia but not as Nazi symbol but as LGBTQ symbol. GPSLeo (talk) 00:59, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even LGBTQ symbols are not banned per se, but only in spaces where they could be seen by minors, as far as I know. In gay bars or private spaces there are no issues with those symbols. But as I said in my initial response, I would agree with your nomination based on redundancy to {{Nazi symbol}}; it's just that redundancy was not your original deletion rationale. Nakonana (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Circolo cea logo definitivo.jpg

unlikely to be own work, used for promotion at Wikidata Martin Urbanec (talk) 13:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen.jpg

This file was initially tagged by CangCot as no permission (No permission since).

Flickr source shows the photograph had a CC-BY-SA license between 2012 and 2014, and Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen at van nghe au chau 2008 Rijswijk (196).jpg

This file was initially tagged by CangCot as no permission (No permission since).

Flickr source shows the photograph had a CC-BY-SA license between 2012 and 2014. Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nguyen Cao Ky Duyen 00.jpg

This file was initially tagged by CangCot as no permission (No permission since).

Flickr source shows the photograph had a CC-BY-SA license between 2012 and 2014. Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:23, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:شعار مؤسسة فيرست.png

Copyrighted NANöR (talk) 16:25, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files found with Special:Search/Coats of arms of families to be classified dessiné

Dessins réalisés par des utilisateurs et inutilisables, du moins dans un contexte enyclopédique. Ce dernier point peut toutefois être discuté ici.

User-made drawings, that are unusable, at least in an encyclopaedic context. However, this last point can be discussed here.

Kontributor 2K (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:План усадьбы Васильевское Повалишиных.jpg

Не собственная работа, скопировано из интернета с чужого сайте. По виду - скан из печатного источника. Igel B TyMaHe (talk) 17:24, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Still Studio Sport Marga van Arnhem.png

The uploaded is not the owner of the material. Tekstman (talk) 18:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viceyoralty of New Granada flag map.png

OOS so called "flag map." Adamant1 (talk) 18:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. The en:Viceroyalty of New Granada was a real territory in South America, but this map doesn't obviously match up with its historical borders. I'm dubious of the value of flag maps in general, and this one certainly seems more confusing than enlightening. Omphalographer (talk) 20:15, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:قبائل العمريه.png

صورة مخالفة من مستخدم ممنوع Mohammed Qays 🗣 19:36, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:FN3011.jpg

Page has new and better picture, there is no link from the FN 30-11 page to this picture Edwin76 (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mother 2 Boxart.png

The user assumes the cover is in the public domain but the logo includes depth and what the O represents is a particular and unique design (possibly a planet with clouds?), so it could reach COM:TOO Japan. Taichi (talk) 19:48, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:World map with arbitrarily red coloured states.png

Non-sensical map. Out of scope. Till (talk) 20:00, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ages of Conflict Map Key.png

I created this file, but it is now superseded by File:Ages_of_Conflict_Map_Key.svg and I don't want anyone to use this version on accident Croomfolk (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Museu Memorial do Cerrado da PUC Goiás

Unsure about the status of COM:TOO Brazil for taxidermies and reconstructions of skeletons. Also possibly not permanently enough for COM:FOP Brazil as the exhibits are movable. If protection applies by being beyond a TOO and against FOP, then a deletion would be in order.

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:08, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Is there a reason to think taxidermies are not "works" under the law quoted at COM:TOO Brazil that states that "Works permanently located in public places may be freely represented by painting, drawing, photography and audiovisual processes"? Unless there is a specific provision or ruling stating that somehow taxidermies are defined as not "works" under Brazilian law, it seems way beyond COM:PCP to posit that they could be. And further: "According to the available jurisprudence, and the ongoing debate about Article 48 in Brazil, "Public places" means "places available to the public", including private property and building interiors.[...]Examples of public places quoted in a 2017 court case include squares, gardens, sidewalks, parks, avenues, streets, museums, cultural entities." As for the question of permanence, taxidermied animals and skeletons put in a fixed position and exhibited in landscaped dioramas with custom painted backgrounds are pretty damn permanent. Drawings, paintings on canvas and sculptures are a lot more likely to be loaned for temporary exhibits than these, and if the potential for such loans were a reason to dispute Brazilian FoP in museums on the basis of a lack of permanence, then logically, they wouldn't have ruled that FoP applies to museums at all or their legislature would have passed legislation to overturn the 2017 court case I quoted above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:36, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Kinoplex Goiânia

The advertisements do not fulfil the requirement of permanent exhibition in a public place that is needed for COM:FOP Brazil, hence they become a copyvio. COM:De Minimis is also not applicable on the nominated files as the protected works depicted on them are not incidentally included.

Additional rationale for Kinoplex Goiânia Shopping 03.jpg: useless, way too much blur.

The "permanent" status of the graphics on "Kinoplex Goiânia Shopping 04.jpg" could be confirmed, though, I included the file in the DR as a precaution.

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:14, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Centro Cultural Marieta Telles Machado

No COM:FOP Brazil for texts, hence they become a copyvio. COM:De Minimis is also not applicable on the nominated files as the protected works depicted on them are not incidentally included. Also: possibly not permanently placed in the public.

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless I missed something, the COM:FOP Brazil section does not mention texts at all. So I would apply COM:PCP to images of possibly copyrightable texts but don't have the information to affirmatively assert that there is no FoP for texts there; do you? The second photo definitely looks permanent, not something likely to be removed lightly, but I would support deleting both photos per COM:PCP, absent any additional information. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:44, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arnaldo Freire files

The live screen image behind the artist is definitely not permanent (cf. COM:FOP Brazil). So, these photos likely become a copyvio of the work by the cameraman at the venue (possible subject of debate: COM:TOO Brazil). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:27, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Cinépolis Estação Cuiabá

The advertisements do not fulfil the requirement of permanent exhibition in a public place that is needed for COM:FOP Brazil, hence they become a copyvio. COM:De Minimis is also not applicable on the nominated files as the protected works depicted on them are not incidentally included.

Grand-Duc (talk) 20:35, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:رضا-مسرور.webp

This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See https://tejaratnews.com/بخش-صنعت-معدن-تجارت-40/938269-رضا-مسرور-دبیر-شورای-عالی-مناطق-آزاد. Google translate has in the footer "the use of news and content is permitted with reference to the source", is that a free license? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that just a requirement for attribution, which is perfectly OK? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily: "use" may not include making of derivative works. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wappen RAV Absolvia Kulmbach von 1899 im FAC.png

Die Verbindung ist von 1899. Aber von wann ist dieses aufwändige Wappen? Greift pd-old? GerritR (talk) 20:57, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Die Wappen, Zirkel wie auch anderes Couleur https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Couleur und ein Comment (Regelwerk) gehören zu den Dingen, die anlässlich der Gründung oder in den ersten Gründungsjahren angeschafft werden.

Siehe auch auf der Website der RAV Absolvia Kulmbach: https://absolvia-kulmbach.de/die-geschichte-der-rav-absolvia/ mit zwei Couleurkarten von 1902 bereits mit dem einfachen Wappen. (es ist üblich, dass verschiedene Wappenformen geführt werden; Unterscheide einfaches Wappen und Vollwappen)

LG Alrael (talk) 22:10, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Relikviář sv. Maura - nalezení.png

I'm unsure, but works by police probably don't fall within the scope of PD-CzechGov it's work of the police of the Czechoslovak Socialistic Republic — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. 121/20 §3 doesn't define any exception for police work nor for investigation files ("Protection under copyright law does not apply to an official work, which is a legal regulation, decision, measure of a general nature, public document, publicly accessible register and collection of its documents, as well as an official draft of an official work and other preparatory official documentation, including an official translation of such work, parliamentary and senate publications, commemorative books of a municipality (municipal chronicles), the state symbol and the symbol of a unit of local self-government and other such works for which there is a public interest in excluding from protection"). Xth-Floor (talk) 11:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Bioparque Pantanal

The posters, murals, paintings, models / sculptures or taxidermies do not fulfil the requirement of permanent exhibition in a public place that is needed for COM:FOP Brazil, hence they become a copyvio. COM:De Minimis is also not applicable on the nominated files as the protected works depicted on them are not incidentally included.

Other rationale only for Bioparque Pantanal 16.jpg: useless / out of scope, bad quality / blur sees for a lack of educational usability.

Grand-Duc (talk) 22:07, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know all of these to have been temporary exhibits? It looks to me like some of the photographs show permanent exhibits and some don't. File:Bioparque Pantanal 08.jpg, File:Bioparque Pantanal 11.jpg, File:Bioparque Pantanal 14.jpg, File:Bioparque Pantanal 16.jpg (albeit blurred) and File:Bioparque Pantanal 29.jpg look permanent, so I'd Keep them except probably not the blurriest one. File:Bioparque Pantanal 30.jpg, File:Bioparque Pantanal 31.jpg and File:Bioparque Pantanal 32.jpg seem to be pretty clearly photographs of a temporary exhibit, so they should presumably be Deleted. I'm not sure about File:Bioparque Pantanal 05.jpg or File:Bioparque Pantanal 06.jpg, so if there's doubt about that exhibit's permanence, they should be deleted per COM:PCP. File:Bioparque Pantanal 07.jpg seems to show a still from a presumably copyrighted film, so should also presumably be Deleted. I would really like to keep File:Bioparque Pantanal 09.jpg; I believe that depends on whether the image in the background is a projected static image or a still from a movie that's played there, but correct me if I'm misunderstanding Brazilian law, as I'm no lawyer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only went for the exhibits' appearances to determine whether something is permanently affixed somewhere or if a temporary exhibition is to be assumed. And, as I am neither experienced in Brazilian copyright law, I used German law standards as far as I know them for the question of permanence (meaning movable exhibits and frames on walls that could be taken into storage, out of public sight = non permanent). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 16:15, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But some of these look like very permanent dioramas. I grew up going to the Natural History Museum in New York often, and as I recall, the dioramas there have been there since the 19th century. Several of these photos are of similar-looking dioramas. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking of another deletion request. This isn't the museum with the taxidermied animals. Anyway, the closing admin will sort things out. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] 【500問耐久クイズ】完走できるのは1人だけ！出場者の意気込みを紹介

[2] こども霞が関見学デー2023

[1]

[2]

Commons:Deletion requests/2024/12/22

December 22

File:Takushi Izawa.jpg and File:Takushi Izawa (cropped).jpg

Files found with Special:Search/Coats of arms of families to be classified dessiné

Files in Category:Museu Memorial do Cerrado da PUC Goiás

Files in Category:Kinoplex Goiânia

Files in Category:Centro Cultural Marieta Telles Machado

Arnaldo Freire files

Files in Category:Cinépolis Estação Cuiabá

Files in Category:Bioparque Pantanal

Navigation menu

Search