Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 8

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
← Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 →

2.86.132.44

Resolved
Not vandalism, just edit warring.
Luxure, you do not 'own' the description, even if you uploaded the file, and you both need to discuss it on the talk page instead of you arbitrarily blanking the IP editors comments there. You should not be trying to have a discussion in edit summaries, especially one where you threaten another editor with blocking. You are both 'wrong' in your behavior, regardless of whose description is correct (and tbh, it should probably be described as the former flag, with the relevant dates, regardless of what else is mentioned). "Vandalism" is when a person is intentionally damaging things, not when they disagree about something but are acting in good faith.
Your claim to the copyright is probably bogus anyhow, since the exact same image was uploaded as a PNG in 2010 (merely changing an image from one format to another is not a creative act and does not create a copyright claim). Revent (talk) 05:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Revent, visit the "Macedonians (ethnic group)" page on wikipedia. The flag is referenced as the ethnic flag for these people, so the description is correct. Luxure Σ 05:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Luxure: Ah, fair enough, I was mixing up that design with this one based on a textual description. Still, the IP's edit aren't really 'vandalism', even if misguided, just a content dispute, and people should be warned on their personal talk pages, not in edit summaries. The drama should be hashed out on the image talk page, not in an edit war, and you were wrong when you blanked the IPs attempt to do so. What is the correct description should be decided by discussion and consensus (you do not own the file page, even if you own the copyright to the image), and if someone is attempting to act in good faith but still causing problems they should be taken to COM:AN/U, not here.... this board is for 'obvious' vandalism (like if they were changing it to 'flag of the penises' or something). Revent (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
It's just adding NPOV info, that's really not needed for an image, better suits an article. I will however undo my edit on the talk page. Luxure Σ 05:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Indeed, but it's not vandalism, it's just a content dispute/edit war. Don't war, talk it out, and ask for other opinions if needed to get consensus...then, if the IP keeps fighting about it, go to ANU. Revent (talk) 06:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
I protected the file File:Ethnic_Macedonian_Flag.svg for a week in hope to avoid an edit war. Macedonia is a hot topic right now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks my favourite owl! Luxure Σ 11:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Owl? Right.... --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: Harry Potter's owl is named Hedwig. INeverCry 23:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
That one. Gotcha. Thanks for waking me up! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Anteatergogy

Resolved
  • User: Anteatergogy (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: Sockpuppet of a banned user, making his habitual threats of violence when his spam is removed. Could someone please visit this person's contributions and do this right thing? It also would be very wise to run a sock check, because he's had many hundreds of sockpuppets since early 2006 at least, and I know he has had several on Commons in the last few months, including "Dempseyfan", "Boxingant", and others. Thanks,

Antandrus (talk) 20:57, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Gaelgouma665

Resolved

Prosfilaes (talk) 15:16, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Both entries hidden. --Túrelio (talk) 15:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
I blocked this account undef. No productive edit expected. Yann (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2015 (UTC)


Delhi Escorts 919999465530

Resolved

AntanO 07:40, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done nuked, blocked, key thrown away. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:24, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

185.10.127.52

Resolved

Pallerti (talk) 16:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

I've protected both your talk and user page to be safe. I've also hidden the IP revisions. I'll keep a watch on your pages. INeverCry 01:26, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
@INeverCry: Thank you for your help! --Pallerti (talk) 08:12, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Cokeystarrzzz

Resolved
FYI: Reverted and blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:14, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
(comment after resolution) FWIW, someone has been creating multiple socks just for the purpose of marking 'WMF banned users' as socks of Russavia... the WMF has been, a bit ironically, locking them as 'WMF banned user'. Revent (talk) 08:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
That's a good one for a change. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

OmarJyuushiS

Pending

Only (talk) 10:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, DR created. Yann (talk) 11:55, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Vicent.Dissident

Pending

Coentor (talk) 12:49, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Jonassés Lucas

Resolved

↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 02:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Deleted, user warned by others. Blocking is not yet necessary. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Rosa Pewter

Resolved

Howicus (...Australians?) (talk) 17:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, vandalism revisions deleted. Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Alexander_R.Karanik

Resolved

Voyagerim (talk) 06:03, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

After reviewing the history of this uploader, I decided to only leave a message (end copyvio or...) on his talk page. If that doesn't do it a block seems in order. Let's wait if he replies to the DR of his last uploads. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Ghunchaali43

Resolved

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:09, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Otávio Leonardo

Resolved

Achim (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

✓ Indef block changes reverted / deleted.

193.190.112.194

Sockpuppet (Biopics), and please protect Biopics's user talk page. /St1995 09:10, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

User:Biopics had expressedly asked for deletion of all his user/talkpages, as he no longer wants to contribute to Commons. As he has formerly contributed a large number of valuable high-quality images (though later has become angered and somewhat gone rogue), IMO he merits to have his wish granted (also per meta:Right to vanish). Of course, that does neither mean a right to have his earlier uploads deleted nor does it make him exempt from getting blocked, in case he would still sock. Therefore, his known user/usertalk pages should be deleted. They can still be tagged as socks, visible for admins. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done I've protected his master acct user page and blocked the above static IP for 1 year. INeverCry 09:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

120.29.65.*

Test edits (example) /St1995 09:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I've soft-blocked 120.29.64.0/22 for 1 month. INeverCry 09:27, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Thomas Deanna Johnson

Resolved

Carl Lindberg (talk) 22:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Can I also add ceiling fan vandalism of File:Fourth of July fireworks behind the Washington Monument, 1986.jpg ? --Hydraton31 (talk) 22:52, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked and revisions deleted. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Fukkyoobich

Resolved

Hydraton31 (talk) 23:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked and revisions deleted. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Fukkubich

Resolved
✓ Done INeverCry 14:06, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Olei

Resolved

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:32, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

AmazingSly

Resolved

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:59, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

I gave him a final warning. Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:28, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
Setting status to Resolved since there was an action taken. If he continues, change the status to {{Pending}} and leave a comment here. — regards, Revi 09:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Image boy jr.

Warned by Yann. No need to block right now. IMHO that is. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: @Hedwig in Washington: Just though I'd bring this to your attention: User:Image uploader sr. - almost certainly the same person, but only 1 edit. INeverCry 15:37, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: The show goes on: same procedure (mirroring, changing colors, cheating at running photo challenge), just using another user account: User:Speedy McQueen. --Achim (talk) 19:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

A.Savin

Resolved

Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 19:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Yeah that's right, I insulted an anonymous IP who harrassed me on COM:Форум including inappropriate personal info. The only thing I don't understand is why Artem K. is calling me a vandal. --A.Savin 20:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
 Not done While we should not insult vandals because some seem to like that there is nothing actionable here. Not the best edit summary ever but that's all there is to say. Natuur12 (talk) 20:18, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Miniwiki-99

Pending

Tartufo (msg) 14:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning added. Yann (talk) 15:49, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Category talk:コモンズ・ヘルプ

Spam, please protect against re-creation. /St1995 19:17, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

43.224.85*

Vandalism /St1995 11:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

I semi-protected Category:Balinese female toplessness. Yann (talk) 11:26, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

105.172.0.0/16

Only vandalism and test edits: 105.172.48.82, 105.172.30.20, 105.172.14.56, 105.172.31.201, previously blocked 2 times. Can someone block this range? See also 105.168.0.0/16 /St1995 20:17, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 6 months (anon only & account creation) because of two previous checkuser blocks. Affected ips 105.172.0.0 --> 105.172.255.255. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:27, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Elfa4lpkerks

Resolved

MaximusM4 (talk) 22:35, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

FCKGW-RHQQ2-YXRKT-8TG6W-2B7Q8

Resolved

194.12.18.244 20:45, 19 July 2015 (UTC) Mike

✓ Done Blocked by Denniss. Yann (talk) 22:24, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Prof adel2458

Pending

Uoaei1 (talk) 22:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. Yann (talk) 22:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Search results

I am looking through pictures I did requests for of bridges landscapes etc and I keep getting Pictures of Penises. I find this annoying and disgusting. Please fix your picture search results so this does not happen thank you. The following is a link to one of the offending pictures that comes up in a search for bridges: File:Skin bridge glans.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:5123:8B00:113A:ED47:9E39:490A (talk • contribs)

This is not a mistake. Search engine works in such way. On the contrary, it would be a mistake, if search for bridges would not find that picture. But you can look category:Bridges with all its subcategories. There you do not find penises. In the future, use categories more than search engines, but this is not search engine's mistake, this is a way to get such results you cannot obtain from categories and this is also useful. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

لشقر

Pending

Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 18:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Reverted and warned. I'll keep an eye on this.Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:16, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Karthikesa

Pending
All his/her contributions are deleted, but sockpuppet investigation request in meta is still going. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

FelipeFingRios

Resolved

Bagumba (talk) 05:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Warned, files deleted. Yann (talk) 08:33, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Repeated Vandalism by USER Magnolia677 to Wiki page "Valatie, New York"

Resolved

Vaaltje (talk) 22:34, 30 July 2015 (UTC) further to earlier vandalism report re USER "Magnolia677" A simple Google Search also reveals the true, accurate historical factual spelling of the original name of Valatie, "Vaaltje" see two examples below:

https://books.google.com/books?id=xvBkAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=vaaltje dutch&source=bl&ots=n5eNaDMMy6&sig=dmicy7T-4iVhQxrYp_meQ4HEA-M&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAGoVChMIxIjgxfKDxwIVTJseCh0YSw9W#v=onepage&q=vaaltje dutch&f=false

http://www.valatievillage.com/#!history/c1se

For the dispute report, please go to COM:AN/U. Thank you. — regards, Revi 02:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

151.228.145.155

Pending

Shakko (talk) 21:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

blocked. -- Geagea (talk) 21:19, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
Reblocked for 1 day in light of continuing vandalism to talk page. Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:29, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

178.65*

Vandalism after warnings (178.65.108.167, 178.65.99.62, 178.65.109.106 and more...) /St1995 17:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Blocked 178.65.96.0/20 for 1 week. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:49, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

95.153.0.0 - 95.153.182.215 would block 65536 users. Hmmm..., better not. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:51, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

1 week block for IP:

  • 187.151.148.114
  • 95.153.182.215
  • 1.187.11.2
  • 197.144.200.20

Do you have more? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:59, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

user:Членябинская сторожевая

Vandal. /St1995 22:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Double whammy treatment by Natuur12 and DerHexer. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:02, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Членябинская сторожевая

Resolved

El-chupanebrej (talk) 22:56, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Jwhalifax

Pending
✓ Done I blocked Jwhalifax for one month, and the sock Peeragegb undef. Yann (talk) 15:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

EnekoEnekonis

Pending
Is there any additional information to be provided to take action here? -- Maxxl² - talk 15:00, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

New Sockpuppet of Jerry Dandridge: Moodrush

Pending

Илья Драконов

Resolved

— cheloVechek / talk 18:15, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done 3 months block for copyvio uploads. --A.Savin 21:48, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Членябинец

Resolved

Matiia (talk) 21:26, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

First block, 1 week, next will be infinite --Ezarateesteban 21:40, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

GFreihalter

Pending

Edelseider (talk) 14:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Added a last warning. Yann (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
  • Vandalism ???

Category:Stained glass windows should be in the category of the building and not in the category Interior of the building. Windows are neither inside nor outside, they are both and they are part of the building. Category:Interiors of churches or other buildings have nothing to do with Category:Stained glass windows. My contributions are not Vandalism, but logical.--GFreihalter (talk) 14:55, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

plz revert vandalism

at File:Blade Solid Gold.jpg. Apparently I "do not have the permission to review images, this edit was therefore disabled", else I would have done it myself. Why can a vandal remove a review template and somebody wanting to revert this vandalism cannot restore it? Should I apply to become a file reviewer? --Vydra (talk) 16:53, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done by Druddigon (talk · contribs). You now have the necessary permissions to review files. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:07, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
@Rodhullandemu I only managed to revert one of the edits but I was met with the same block notice telling me I didn't have permission to edit the page--Druddigon (talk) 18:19, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
@Rodhullandemu: I removed the permission again, never grant this right without dicussion on COM:License review/requests. The "confirmed" group was total nonsense. --Didym (talk) 18:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Sorry guys, I forgot you have to apply for these rights. However, I don't see any issues with either of these editors. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Dr. Brandon Jones

Resolved
✓ Done You warned dr. Brandon Jones. All his contributions are now deleted. I think, that no action is needed now. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

User:Royzeel12

Pending

Druddigon (talk) 14:25, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

for some reason it shows the account as unregistered but a link to it is here. --Druddigon (talk) 14:30, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Undef., all files deleted. Yann (talk) 15:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

68.81.82.97

Resolved

ClandestineSurveillance (talk) 11:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by Denniss for one day due to vandalism. Taivo (talk) 15:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

108.5.64.5

Pending

Achim (talk) 18:53, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Seems to be active here for almost two months under various 108.5 IPs, this unsourced cat spamming in the example would be a BLP violation at en wiki. I vague remember similar IP edits over there. No idea how to properly stop this other than a range block.--Denniss (talk) 23:03, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Annieyaz

Resolved
Note: indef blocked at enwiki. And just to avoid eventual surprises (user is registered in other wiki but has no contribs) I requested also a global lock on meta. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:23, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Blocked indef, uploads nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:58, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

66.37.226.196

spambot /St1995 16:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

178.65.96.14

Continuing vandalism. /St1995 16:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 4 weeks. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:56, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Yasméssica

Resolved

–Davey2010Talk 22:41, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Uploads nuked and two week block. MorganKevinJ(talk) 00:48, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Brilliant thanks :) –Davey2010Talk 21:56, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

my ipad is being hacked

USER/IP

Resolved

72.187.35.168 00:00, 20 August 2015 (UTC) to whom it may concern, i am being hacked and need to resolve this issue as fast as possiable. ive changed my password and user name so many times. i was trying to download a antivirus and fire wall but its blocking me once again. can you please help me

The username is not registered. I am not sure, what kind of help do you need. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Judging from the above, pretty much «beyond help», I think. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:47, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done I marked this as resolved. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Muri 91

Pending

Użytkownik o adresie 31.1.202.74 tworzy błędne i niepotrzebne kategorie. Przykładowo Category:EN57 of SKM musiała zostać przeniesiona do Category:EN57 of SKM Trójmiasto, bo była niedokładnie nazwana (mamy SKM w Trójmieście, ale i w Warszawie), ponadto sortowanie zdjęć pojazdów do kategorii odpowiednich przewoźników często jest przeprowadzane niepoprawnie (przykładowo EN57 w malowaniu Dolnego Śląska według użytkownika od razu kwalifikuje pojazdy jako należące do Kolei Dolnośląskich, podczas gdy są to pojazdy Przewozów Regionalnych, KD mają jedynie kilka sztuk EN57 i to zmodernizowanych) i trzeba po użytkowniku sprzątać. W przypadku kategorii znajdujących się w Category:Rail transport in Poland in the 2010s niemożliwe jest (a przynajmniej bardzo długo będzie to trwać) posortowanie wszystkich kolejowych zdjęć. W związku z powyższym proszę o blokadę tegoż adresu bądź najlepiej szerszego zakresu. Muri (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

EN57 w malowaniu Dolnego Śląska zostały przeniesione do odpowiedniej kategorii.--31.1.202.74 19:35, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Nadal błędnie. W Category:EN57 of Koleje Dolnośląskie są 4 pliki, których być tam nie powinno. Ilostan taboru KD jest na stronie pl:Koleje Dolnośląskie. Nie mamy zdjęć czterech należących do przewoźnika EN57. Kategoria nie ma racji bytu. PS. Skoro masz taki wkład w projekty Wikimedia, nie myślałeś o założeniu konta zamiast tak pisać ciągle spod cyferek? Muri (talk) 23:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Hoshenlevi222

Pending

Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 05:37, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done All his/her uploads are nominated for deletion. I warned him/her. Next copyright violation will result a block. Taivo (talk) 15:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Thank you! --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

178.65*

Pending
Blocked 178.65.96.0/20 for 3 months. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


EndeRock2

Pending

Oscar_. (talk) 22:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ blocked and uploads nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


Buckyconakrynoumea

Pending

KurodaSho (talk) 04:46, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Blocked 1 week. Thibaut120094 (talk) 05:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

5.142.24.171

Block evasion: 178.65.96.0/20. /St1995 11:05, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 3 days. Yann (talk) 11:59, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

Alamdanishnepali

User
Alamdanishnepali (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
Reason for reporting
Repeatedly vandalizes file pages by uploading unrelated images on top of existing ones. An example is this FP: File:F-16 Royal Danish Air Force Diamond Formation at Danish Air Show 2014-06-22.jpg.

-- Slaunger (talk) 06:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done User blocked for a month, vandalism reverted, vandalistic picture versiones deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I had him on my list, was waiting for a reaction after my warning. I'd actually indeffed him as I expect nothing good from this account. --Denniss (talk) 08:05, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for intervening, Taivo . -- Slaunger (talk) 08:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

81.177.254.196

81.177.254.196 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  Long-term abuse. /St1995 11:51, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ blocked 3 mo. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

42.60.8.216 (talk · contribs)

Long-term abuse. /St1995 12:10, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --A.Savin 12:27, 1 September 2015 (UTC)


Runnerleaks

Resolved

189.238.68.68 21:55, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 22:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

USER/IP Fry1989 has stolen my work with Kyle Lockwood's flag alt (Black and Green) and put it under his name and deleted it from my page

Resolved

Kevymtnz (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Apparently you are talking about Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kevymtnz Flag 2014 Green.PNG. Fry did not stole your work, he did not claim to be author of the replacement file. And Fry did not delete "your" file, he nominated it for deletion. INeverCry deleted the file and I think, that the decision is correct. If there are the same flag in .png and .svg version, then .png is usually deleted. Commons users must act nicely towards each other and if you name Fry once more a thief, then you can get blocked. Taivo (talk) 14:25, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
@Kevymtnz: I agree with Taivo. Apart from that i reverted your edits on the flags, the flags are indeed a dw by @Fry1989: . And please remove the false claims from your userpage. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
As far as I unstand the users claim on his user page, he also accuses User:Fry1989 to be a sockpuppet of User:INeverCry ... Not a good idea without evidences. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:39, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
@Kevymtnz: I have nominated another of "your" flags for speedy deletion because I found it at http://www.silverfernflag.org/ marked "© Copyright 2000-2015. All rights reserved." It is actually the work of Kyle Lockwood who runs that site. I also suggest removing the false claim from your user page at your earliest convenience. At Commons COM:AGF "assume good faith" is one of our primary rules. By making unfounded accusations you are not actualizing your AGF for Fry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I propose that we block Kevymtnz because he clearly is incapable of participating in a cummunity project and this is harrasment. I already deleted the user page. And given this page it becomes awfully clear that Kevymtnz is not mature enough. Natuur12 (talk) 16:36, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
This user previously asked me why I "stole" "their" image 2 weeks ago and I provided what I believed to be a reasonable answer. As for disruption, they have used the user email tool to send me a private email again asking why I stole their flag. Thank you everyone for seeing through this silliness in my absence. @Ellin Beltz: , I will address the copyright situation of the flags shortly (about 2 hours) when I'm off work. Fry1989 eh? 21:35, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Certainly nonsense accusation. Fry is not the one who has to answer here.

 Info I changed the Vandal in Question from Fry to Kevymtnz . That's called shooting yourself in the foot. For the harassment on enwiki: That's a problem enwiki-admins have to look at. It paint's a pretty ugly picture of Kevymtnz tho.

✓ Done For calling another user a thief Kevymtnz got a 6 month vacation courtesy of me. Email access removed as well, see above for rationale. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I can not imagine what possible grounds this person has to believe INeverCry and I are the same person, of all users on Commons INC is the one of the last I would expect to be accused of being a sock of. Fry1989 eh? 21:47, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
Instead of requesting his unblock in his Talk page... I think that the user should be permanently blocked, due to the short period of vandalism and Harassment. --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Agreed, though I'd make it an indefinite rather than a infinite block. Also I think that they have proven that they have zero competence to contribute on Commons. Bidgee (talk) 07:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Removing category

User: Silar (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . Removing category: 1, 2. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 05:38, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I reverted and noticed the user. If (s)he continues, then block is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Silar reverted the edit once more and got blocked for a month. This is his/her 3rd block. The category is obviously legitimate. Taivo (talk) 14:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Ceiling fan vandal

Dong ding dong ding dong ding (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  - usual modus operandi (uploading poor-quality picture of a ceiling fan [probably a YouTube screenshot] and adding it to unrelated article). - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:38, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Blocked and nuked Just another David Beals vandalpuppet. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
All three blocked, all four tagged. Taivo (talk) 14:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Vinrese.stewart.48

Resolved
Uploads nuked, scope warning left. No block justified yet. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:58, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Jean11

Pending

darkweasel94 09:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

I've now managed to re-add the category with VisualFileChange. I'm leaving this here for the record. darkweasel94 09:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Yes, can't remove usercats w/o any discussion. Strange. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:15, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Tabdoor Ibians

Resolved

C.Fred (talk) 02:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Thibaut120094 (talk) 03:33, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

SHDJASHDH

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 17:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


Tppppiu5

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, tagged and nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Floureslight

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Blocked & file deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


Muck Rosoft

Resolved

NeilN (talk) 00:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


Leiefngf

Resolved

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:06, 10 September 2015 (UTC) ✓ Done Blocked and nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Lfixtures

Resolved

Fan GB

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. WJBscribe (talk) 15:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


Ceilingtiletastic

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Fnncnfnf

Resolved

BethNaught (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done by Denniss. Ankry (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Thomadjddfdj

Resolved

Saboetage (talk) 15:50, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done by Denniss. Ankry (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

GRTY557699I0

✓ Done by Denniss. Ankry (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Jdsdkfflsj and more

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 00:57, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Blocked'n nuked --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:34, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


OcalaWiki

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 03:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Casablanca S3

Resolved

Ududafggfg

Resolved

Northamerica1000 (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


JoeyDeener

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 15:38, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


Fnfkrf

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 01:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Ffdfdsf

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

790hh

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Blocked. Thanks for reporting. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:16, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

AnonMoos

Resolved

Keφr (keep talk here) 07:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

FFS, really? You were just blocked after repetitive complaints and agreements by multiple users (not just AnonMoos and myself, several admins agreed as well) with your bad nominations, and you're basically giving us the middle finger and saying you won't change one thing about your attitude problem. Fry1989 eh? 16:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Honestly, you are both (AnonMoos and Kephir) just as bad. AnonMoos should not speedy close them and Kephir should stop nominating them. Natuur12 (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Well what would you have AnonMoos (and myself too) do when every nomination made by Kephir so far has been deleted? If no admin is going to do anything, someone has to! Don't blame AnonMoos for admin inaction. Fry1989 eh? 16:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Just remain calm, make a dossier and give the opponent no excuse to make you or AnonMoos part of the problem. You did the right thing by making a post at AN/U. Natuur12 (talk) 22:42, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
No clear case of vandalism. Changing status to {{Resolved}} - this dispute should be discussed on the relevant AN/U teared. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I have mentioned that the behaviour should cease - I'm in agreement with Natuur12 though mainly. --Herby talk thyme 17:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

69.178.195.166

Resolved

Matiia (talk) 01:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

vandalism in French translation - Commons:Pour nous contacter

Resolved
  • User: Unknown - pas connu (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: When I look at the page https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Pour_nous_contacter I see obvious vandalism in the title: "je voudrais vous achetez le [name of a brand of car] ... repondre". I got to this page through a redirect: below the page title I see: "(Redirigé depuis Commons:Pour nous contacter)". I couldn't find out on which page this content comes from - I assume it's a translation page somewhere. I have French as my chosen interface language. I have commons.wikimedia.org javascript disabled at the moment. I am logged in right now (which is obvious anyway, from my signature:). Hope this helps find where the vandalism is.

Boud (talk) 13:40, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Reverted Translations:Commons:Contact us/Page display title/fr. --Achim (talk) 14:46, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

195.9.128.0/17

Long-term abuse, socking. /St1995 11:51, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:44, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Patrick Nese 96

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Dayturd

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Turd flushed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:47, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

Infestus 969

Pending

1970gemini (talk) 08:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)


Freddydead

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Blocked, deleted. Materialscientist (talk) 00:41, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Fhfnnr

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 16:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Blocked. Thanks for reporting! --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)


User:Nashville the joe

Resolved

Acroterion (talk) 01:00, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Done. Materialscientist (talk) 01:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Una Razon Social

Resolved

Jahobr (talk) 11:45, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Warning on talk page left. I don't think he/she will be back. Seems to be a young kid playing Wiki. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:16, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Googler's

Resolved
✓ Done Denniss blocked Googler's indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Πρώτη Σερρών

Resolved
Also affected: User:Γιάννης 4, likely 2nd account of his.

Achim (talk) 07:33, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

I blocked Γιάννης 4 indefinitely as probable sockpuppet. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done I mark the case as resolved. He is blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry and uploading copyvios. Most of his uploads are deleted and rest are nominated for deletion, all socks are indefinitely blocked and their uploads are also deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

69.178.193.165

Resolved

—LX (talk, contribs) 06:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked by Túrelio for a day, vandalism reverted. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

120.29.64.0/22

[8] LTA. /St1995 14:37, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

✓ 6 months. --A.Savin 15:23, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

213.87.126.205

Pending

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:32, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

--Rsmn (talk) 04:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Pending
  • User: [[:User:--[[User:Rsmn|Rsmn]]_([[User_talk:Rsmn|talk]])_04:29,_11_October_2015_(UTC)|--Rsmn (talk) 04:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)]] ([[:User talk:--[[User:Rsmn|Rsmn]]_([[User_talk:Rsmn|talk]])_04:29,_11_October_2015_(UTC)|talk]] · [[:Special:Contributions/--[[User:Rsmn|Rsmn]]_([[User_talk:Rsmn|talk]])_04:29,_11_October_2015_(UTC)|contributions]] · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: Sujibala hot(Tamil film actress).JPG libelous content

surreptitiously posted as jpg. Rsmn (talk) 04:29, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

This report is a bit broken, but the file itself was pending as a copyvio speedy (and I deleted it on that basis). The account that uploaded it (User:Reporter007x24) is long stale. Revent (talk) 07:44, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

85.192.188.14

Resolved

Thanks! Sir James (talk) 08:48, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

DR closed. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:06, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


大西達雄

Resolved

Codename Lisa (talk) 10:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism reverted, out of scope uploads massdeleted, user blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


Notajermboy27sock

Resolved
✓ Done The user is indefinitely blocked and tagged as sockpuppet of Jermboy27, all his contributions are deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:23, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikilover1999567890

Resolved
Indef blocked. Thanks for reporting. Alan (talk) 19:39, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Yelloish875

Resolved

Wcam (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Alan (talk) 22:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Spam in File:Sky_Logo_2004_Transparent.png

Resolved

CDdoma (talk) 06:36, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleted as copyvio,complex logo. Fair use only. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:56, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: FYI, looking at the global contributions of this account, I'm trying to poke a Stew on IRC about giving it a global look. The userpage looks 'normal', but other than creating a userpage on several different wikis there is little that doesn't look like creating some kind of long-term sleeper. Revent (talk)

Callum_Fawsitt

Resolved

Rottenarseboy (talk) 09:04, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done The username is not registered, so no action is needed. Instead, I blocked the nominator indefinitely due to bad username. This complaint is his almost only contribution in Commons. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Fuckthisshit23

Fuckthisshit23 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads)  VOA. INeverCry 20:14, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Both undef. Yann (talk) 21:10, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

TimedText vandalism

TimedText:Russell_brand_bbc_radio4_desert_island_discs_21_07_2013.flac.en.srt. INeverCry 20:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

2A02:C7D:1140:8700:B141:8F3D:E7E8:F786

Resolved

Eddaido (talk) 23:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

One day break. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

94.2.134.70

Resolved

Eddaido (talk) 23:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

One day break --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

2A02:C7D:1140:8700:BC21:8AFE:EFE1:968B

Resolved
One day break. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:31, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

(Apparent) vandal removing sort keys

Resolved

(This heading is left over from a previous report; refer to revision 176639059. The original report is now archived at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 8#2A02:C7D:1140:8700:B141:8F3D:E7E8:F786. Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 03:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC))

Armedola

Pending
Note: on ptwiki he did this edit on pt:Disc golf (using this picture of himself despite an entire category). My suspicion remains... Anyway, I apologize if i was hasty. --Dэя-Бøяg 05:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Lot7000

Resolved
✓ Done I blocked him indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Doomedwiki

Resolved
✓ Done I blocked him indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

KACENINE

Resolved
✓ Done I blocked him indefinitely and tagged him. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

ASSUNÇÃO SANTOS - D'MAS - Canarme

Resolved
Advertising agency, nuked and blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Just a question: the account exists on other Wikis but he/she has no contribs. Apart my report at WP:UAA (ORGNAME), could it be a "case" for stewart requests (global), because it is an advertising agency? Following instructions it seems that is not the case, but I was tempted to report him/her. Btw, I'll watch for eventual cross-wiki spam. Thanks again --Dэя-Бøяg 05:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
My gut tells me it's a local agency and probably won't come back here. Maybe on PTwiki tho. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Geregen29

Resolved

Artem Korzhimanov (talk) 08:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked 3 days. Thanks, Alan (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

79.37.201.235

Resolved
Blocked 1 day by Thibaut120094. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Note: Seeing user's edits, as this nonsense or the vandalisms to this and this other DR, I suspect it could be a SP of Fritella, also known as selfie shoes vandal. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


Finnish Air Force

Resolved
 Comment User is already blocked, and so this one is resolved. --Msaynevirta (talk) 19:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

2602:306:CFBE:D540:592D:F2DA:A261:FC1

Resolved

The Anome (talk) 17:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Created Category:Sockpuppets of Prince-au-Léogâne --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Herusantoeso

Resolved

—Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 18:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Nuked and blocked. Alan (talk) 19:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Cherrycwi

Resolved

McGeddon (talk) 09:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Copyvios deleted and user blocked for a week. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 10:13, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

BaltonSignCompany

Resolved
Indef blocked by Ankry per COM:IU. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
I nominated his/her two more photos for deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Menkantis kante

Resolved
  • Note: I found a sort of blog (1 post) about this "theory" and a FB account about the user (files uploaded here come from FB). Anyway, to block and nuke uploads as soon as possible, IMHO. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
2nd note: All the files have been nominated for deletion: 01, 02, 03. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Nuked and blocked Nonsense only account. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppets of Jermboy27

Pending
I blocked both sockpuppets indefinitely and tagged them. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Eduardobalza01

Resolved

—Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 05:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done 2 weeks block. Ankry (talk) 06:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
Shouldn't the status be changed from "Pending" to "Resolved"? —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 12:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
  • @Ankry: Here's a sock account uploading the same copyvios today: User:Eduardobalza0110. IMO, both accounts should be indef-blocked and the sock uploads nuked. @Skyllfully: If you have time, be on the look-out for further socks of this user: I doubt he'll stop at 2 accounts. If more socks are found I can ping checkusers or file an RFCU. INeverCry 03:19, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Okay, no problem. Just from a quick user list search, only the two user accounts were found under that naming scheme (see here). —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 04:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Nuked & RFCU'ed. Ankry (talk) 08:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Both blocked by Krd. Ankry (talk) 09:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

IndustrialInformationCooperation

Resolved

—Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 01:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 Not done This does not seem to be a company name. User already received a block warning for copyvio uploads. Ankry (talk) 10:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

194.96.17.249

Resolved

Amitie 10g (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Ankry (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


98.215.193.216

Resolved

WayfaringWanderer (talk) 20:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done One week block. Ankry (talk) 21:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Get Tory Ailes out of here!

Resolved

Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done indefed --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 10:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Alan (talk) 16:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Add to it Poop Rosoft (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Add to it 166.170.33.132 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . I suspect that he tried to remove the speedy deletion notice from the file the last user uploaded as it was being deleted. (Judging from my notification log.) - Mike Rosoft (talk) 17:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

LenovoTest01

I have blocked User:LenovoTest01 for one day for putting a {{Delete}} tag on my talk page. Since I am directly involved, I would like another Admin to take whatever action seems appropriate to her or him. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Further warned. Longer block may be later. Yann (talk) 20:19, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Campanhaspoliticas

Resolved
Note: I leave a link to user's CentralAuth. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Promotional users are not totally prohibited in Commons, because sometimes they give away good photos about their products. Campanhaspoliticas uploaded only 2 files, one was speedily deleted and I nominated the other for regular deletion. I do not understand even, what kind of politics (s)he campaigns for. COM:IU does not prohibit such kind of usernames. For now, no action is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Nakinn

Resolved

Almondega (talk) 02:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Nakinn explained, that (s)he did not change Almondega's comments, only organized them. (S)He is right. Please stop now the edit war, both. Every revert in this deletion request made by either of you will result a block. Although organizing comments of other users is not prohibited, some users are sensitive in that respect. Nakinn, please do not organize Almondega's comments anymore. Almondega, Nakinn acted only in good faith. No action is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)


More Beals socks

Pending

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked undef. Yann (talk) 20:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done again. Yann (talk) 21:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

95.106.144.187

Pending

Ahecht (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I removed the speedy tags, and further warned the IP. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

114.121.154.154

Resolved

Hop on Bananas (talk) 12:21, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I reverted the changes from that IP address and left a note directing them to the sandbox if they want to experiment with editing. I've also added the file to my watchlist. —RP88 (talk) 12:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Torqöquat

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Mysalt123

Pending


84.151.129.202

Resolved

1971markus ⇒ Laberkasten ... 00:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Blocked by A.Savin. Materialscientist (talk) 00:57, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Killer Rosoft

Resolved
✓ Done Blocked indefinitely by Herby, the only upload is deleted. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

The user returned as Happy thanksgiving day! (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log)  - harassment on my talk page calling attention to his vandalism at Harry Potter wiki. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Bere2015

Pending
Note: I'll watch in case of other contribs in other WM projects. --Dэя-Бøяg 22:20, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Nothing to do now. Already warned, files deleted. Yann (talk) 13:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Bobyr

Pending

Blutgretchen (talk) 10:35, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Warned. Files reverted. Yann (talk) 13:14, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Seems Bobyr doesn't care. He started to revert the reverts.difflink1 difflink2 --Blutgretchen (talk) 13:26, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. Yann (talk) 13:54, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Kzoron

Resolved
Blocked indef. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

RussianStag

Resolved

Bjarlin (talk) 01:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Blocked indef: attack image upload, crosswiki vandal. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Anidaat

Resolved

MBurch (talk) 13:10, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

 Info From a technical point of view, File:Mirage 2115 exits cavern Buochs.jpg doesn't show the typical halftone dots that one would see in reproductions from a book. So it's very unlikely that it was taken from a book, and it's more likely a reproduction of an analogue slide or photo print. It may indeed come from a personal analogue archive. Previous deletions of Anidaat's pictures were founded on doubts about their origin, but there is no proof that his uploads are abusive. MBurch is the originator of these doubts. MBurch is known to abuse Vandalism reports as a means to fight his personal adversaries, and he has been blocked for this behaviour before on the German Wikipedia. Anidaat is a personal adversary of MBurch. At de.wp, Anidaat has started an arbitration process in order to cope with his harassment by MBurch. Please be careful not to get instrumentalized by MBurch. --Sitacuisses (talk) 08:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 Info Sitacuisses got blocked in the German Wikipedia once and his information here is biased on its own. I reported Anidaat simply because the majority of his pictures are older than digital photography and clearly it was completely illegal at that time in Switzerland to take private pictures of an Air Force installation. So far Anidaat couldn't illustrate that he is truly the owner of those pictures that were suggested for deletion (see this conversation as well).--MBurch (talk) 12:01, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I know what I'm talking about because I'm another of MBurch's victims. At de.wp, my account got blocked twice, both times at his request, and that was after more than seven years with an empty block log. The second time, I was immediately unblocked because his allegations were so obviously wrong that even admins' solidarity wouldn't keep them from seeing the injustice. MBurch started even more block requests against me that eventually failed. At de.wp, MBurch is a regular of admins' talk pages, where he will leave his thank-you notes in order to get their goodwill while he sprays his venom. Now, back on topic, he just pointed to the discussion where Anidaat declared that the images are his own analogue photographs. Although MBurch knew this, he still started the current block request against Anidaat, maliciously insisting that they were stolen from books, an allegation that comes down to slander. Please move on, nothing to be seen here, apart from another one of MBurch's abusive block requests. --Sitacuisses (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
You got blocked once because of insulting me that's true. The second time wasn't because of me I even helped you: [14]. Now that's all off topic and has nothing to do with Anidaat who needs to prove that his pictures are no copy right violation. I came here because he upload one picture on German Wikipedia [15] where it got deleted (and not because of me, that was actually Wdwd), but he uploaded most likely the same [16] here and it got deleted again. Now I only point out to those Swiss Air Force pictures of Anidaat that can have no EXIF data because there was no digital photography at that time and further that it was completely forbidden at that time to make pictures of Air Force installation such as this. Or what makes you so sure that those are no copyright violation Sitacuisses?--MBurch (talk) 13:24, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Your mere suspicion is no reason to block a user. Among Anidaats uploads currently visible, there is only a single file that may be subject to military secrecy. But how do you know that he wasn't in a position where he was entitled to take this picture? Anyway, your original request doesn't include any aspects that are at the same time relevant to commons and convincing. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:17, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
His content got deleted here and in the German wikipedia in the past and he still has various pictures from this epoch and not just one as you say. I assumed that he doesn't had a military position / rank in the Swiss Air Force at that time because otherwise it would have been easily for him to prove it here, but it got deleted from Alan. So please Sitacuisses give us some realistic assumptions that besides the so far deleted pictures of Anidaat I'm completely wrong and I'm more than willing to withdraw this report.--MBurch (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, as ever, you are free to spray venom, and others have to prove that you're wrong. States that work by this principle are called rogue regimes. Actually, there is nothing wrong with having analogue photographs of airshows and uploading them to Commons. Sometimes they get hastily deleted for the slightest reason, but that's no reason to block the uploader. What's the purpose of your current proceeding, to break into Anidaat's privacy? To me it seems that he is concerned about his privacy, and that's why he doesn't react more openly to your attacks of his images. --Sitacuisses (talk) 14:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Those kind of insulting is precisely how you got blocked in the German Wikipedia Sitacuisses. I cannot see how you clarify the possible copyright violation of Anidaat by insulting me.--MBurch (talk) 15:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Actually, you started this thread by insulting Anidaat with your insubstantial copyvio accusations. I am free to edit in the German Wikipedia and not blocked. Your fixation on user blocks, that also led to this current request, needs to be resolved. --Sitacuisses (talk) 17:27, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Yes of course copy right violation is the problem of the one that reports it and not the one that causes it. Your motivation here is clearly personal and not about the copy right issue.--MBurch (talk) 17:35, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Of course my motivation is personal, if some person that has acted conspicuously in the past comes on this stage with unsubstantial accusations to block another person. Nonetheless my analysis of your accusations is fact-bound. --Sitacuisses (talk) 17:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Well fact is that various pictures of Anidaat got deleted in the past which I wouldn't call unsubstantial accusations except you want to insult not just me but the involved administrators as well. And the other only fact that you came with is your guess that he might have a position during the cold war to make legally pictures of secret Swiss Air Force installations. Which I don't want to completely neglect, but doesn't seem to be likely (in that case his airshows pictures would be the same quality, wouldn't it?).--MBurch (talk) 18:06, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Why should his photographs from 1972 be the same quality as the one from 1999? That's 27 years later! Wouldn't you expect someone to gain experience in this time and to work with different equipment? That's exactly what you see when you compare these images. The 1972 photographs show the typical vignetting of cheap lenses from that period. --Sitacuisses (talk) 18:34, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
 Not done Two deleted files isn't enough for a block. Please don't import dewiki drama to commons. If a existing file is violating copyright nominate it for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:25, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag of New Zealand.svg

Twice someone tried to overwrite the current New Zealand flag with a possible new one. Even if the referendum is successful, you can't just replace one file with a completely different one. The second round of the flag referendum will take place in March 2016. Until then, the file should be protected. --Voyager (talk) 21:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Already reported elsewhere. Yann (talk) 23:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

The File:Flag_of_New_Zealand.svg page and templates for sports teams on the English Wikipedia are still showing the wrong flag, e.g. New Zealand at the Rugby World Cup. Is this a cache problem, and if so can the cache please be flushed? -- Ham105 (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Looks like an issue with the creation of the images aren't being overwritten, purging doesn't fix it. May need someone to delete the file and quickly restore it (it may work, it has in the past). Bidgee (talk) 04:42, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. Whether through intervention or just elapse of time, the New Zealand at the Rugby World Cup page on en is now showing the correct flag version. However, the File:Flag_of_New_Zealand.svg page on commons still shows the wrong one. Maybe there's just a backlog queue ... a very long one? I don't know. -- Ham105 (talk) 05:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
This is a major software bug they can't seem to fix for soem weeks now. Some kind of thumbnail cache sync issue, purges stall in some of the cache levels. --Denniss (talk) 14:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Bonoboo4545

Resolved

Austriantraveler (talk) 14:13, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

OK - I've blocked the user for a week, the associated IP address (been reverting the cleanup) however my inclination is for indef blocks. This is behaviour that we simply can't tolerate here however I'd appreciate a native speaker taking a look before the decision. --Herby talk thyme 14:34, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done @Herbythyme: I feel this repeated harassment / vandalism justifies an indefinite block. I apologize for overriding your action, Herby! Hit me over the head on my talk page if you feel it wasn't appropriate. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
I entirely agree - years ago I would have done the same think without thinking but times change. Thanks anyway --Herby talk thyme 08:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Indefinite block was a right decision. This is a vandalism-only account. Taivo (talk) 12:03, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Roopeluhtala

Pending

Hansbaer (talk) 07:26, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I added a last warning. I hope it is sufficient. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
I have provided sources that prove conscription is not enforced in Norway or Lithuania. We all agree there is conscription written in both norwegian and lithuanian law. However some people do not understand that the map color should reflect if the law is enforced or not. They think the map color should reflect if conscription is written in the law, which is irrelevant. --Roopeluhtala (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
A new hop through the ring - how come that apparently nobody agrees with you? Wikipedia is all about consensus and compromise, and you do not seem to be particularly interested in either of them. --Hansbaer (talk) 19:55, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

109.252.7.166

Pending

Austriantraveler (talk) 20:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. Yann (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

SVG examples

The page SVG examples is constantly vandalized since more than 2 years. Please lock the page. The IP changes every time, so blocking is no option.--Kopiersperre (talk) 11:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 13:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Project457

Resolved
 Info: Image from facebook: https://scontent-fra3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xfp1/v/t1.0-9/12249814_451163888404521_815640454789357363_n.jpg?oh=1814eb04517b9def655e267555e15f62&oe=570D9E8B --Achim (talk) 09:20, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done All contributions are deleted. Taivo (talk) 15:38, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

abuse of authority administrator

the participant User:Ле Лой remove the image[18] that conforms to the rules Commons:Flickr files --Arrania89 (talk) 09:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

The image in question was a clear example of COM:LL. — Le Loi (talk) 09:57, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyright violation: [19] [20]. Sealle (talk) 11:18, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
ResolvedNo abuse, as per above. Yann (talk) 11:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

109.252.7.137

Pending

Austriantraveler (talk) 09:31, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. Yann (talk) 09:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Can he do it?!?

Wow, Really??? --Kwasura (talk) 20:33, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

  •  Question: Is PsichoPuzo editing in bad faith? I don't see this edition as bad faith, even, your accusations seems to be in bad faith. Please stop editwar, or the only who will be blocked will be you. (Administrators, please see editions from bot users in conflict very close). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:17, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Reply: @Amitie 10g: Yes, he is editing in bad faith even you don't see it. And no, I am no fighting no war, this is why I am writing here on the Administrator's noticeboard. I am not even reverting anything, have a look who reverted all my editions from everywhere. So who are started the war and why I am the one who will be blocked? No disrespect, I just need to understand. Now and then he are coming across disguised trolls whose editions seems to be all right. But just look what I added and what he removed. Just look. --Kwasura (talk) 22:40, 23 December 2015 (UTC)


182.21.196.29

Pending

Matiia (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. Thank you Matiia for reverting the edits. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:53, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

109.252.7.214

✓ Done

Austriantraveler (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Blocked for 1 month each for racist vandalism:
--Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
I suggest to block 109.252.7.* for some time. Yann (talk) 17:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


Blackwhiteupl

Moved to COM:AN/U#Blackwhiteupl
Techman224Talk 00:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Didym

Resolved
  • User: Didym (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: This user makes categories empty. He is deleting the FOP Germany templates out from masses of pictures informations out of the photos. Mainly about the town of Pirna. He deletes even categories of located plants. He means that a photo may only have one category. Around 50 or more categories which linked to other main category paths are empty and my work is wasted.

Blackwhiteupl (talk) 20:02, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

I am only cleaning up your mess with massive overcategorization by abuse of cat-a-lot. (By the way, I am not deleting anything.) Please also see the section above. --Didym (talk) 20:05, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
He deletes here for example and makes all empty or removes photos out of the right categories, that these are empty or only a few pictures are within: Category:Pirna by year, Category:Abandoned buildings in Pirna, Category:Airfield Pirna, Category:Street signs in Pirna, Category:Milvus milvus from Pirna‎, Category:Kiesgrube Pirna - Pratzschwitz/ Birkwitz, Category:Cottage gardens in Pirna, Category:Falco tinnunculus from Pirna, Category:Malus in Pirna, Category:Hydrangea macrophylla cultivars in Pirna, Category:Abies in Pirna, Category:Prunus avium in Pirna, Category:Prunus domestica subsp. prisca in Pirna, Category:Prunus serrulata in Pirna, Category:Tilia in Pirna, Category:Fraxinus excelsior in Pirna, Category:Ginkgo biloba in Pirna, Category:Gleditsia sinensis in Pirna, Category:Gleditsia triacanthos in Pirna, Category:2009 in Pirna, Category:2008 in Pirna, Category:2015 in Pirna, Category:1888 in Pirna, Category:1950 in Pirna and more. In other towns you have the same categories and pictures inside for the town on other places. He does all delete out of categories. Stop him and revert all please.--Blackwhiteupl (talk) 20:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Please read COM:OVERCAT etc. --A.Savin 20:31, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

AnonMoos

Resolved
  • User: AnonMoos (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: This user has been following me around and illegitimately closing every deletion discussion I open. I admit this annoys me quite a bit. I believe my nominations to be appropriate: most of them have been in fact closed with a "delete" result (will provide a list on request). I also believe they should be allowed to run their course without being interrupted by users who apparently cannot approach them in a mature and dispassionate manner. If this is not the appropriate venue, please point me to somewhere where my concerns will be heard adequately. Thank you. Keφr (keep talk here) 15:05, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done I blocked Kephir. The vandal is obviously not AnonMoos. Yann (talk) 15:39, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Vnguyen518

✓ Done

Pitke (talk) 21:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Uploads (c)vios, banner is © 2012 The Aspen Institute, the other two are all over the web and certainly not own work. Files deleted. I don't thing any admin action is needed. I'll leave a note on the talk page. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

USER/IP

Pending

Kdc67 (talk) 04:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC) Someone posted a nude fake picture in lieu of a real one. It needs to be removed... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Nelson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdc67 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 05 January 2016 (UTC)

Kdc67, next time you see a mistake in a page of the English Wikipedia, correct it there (like I did), or add a request for it in its talk page. Coming to Commons to complain about it is as smart as going to your local fire department to complain about goods too spicy at the bakery down the street. (Also, report your own self for vandalism, even if merely for «REASON», is unsmart.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:05, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Timed Text vandalism

Can someone delete TimedText:Story of the Engine that Thought It Could (8 April 1906).ogg.en.srt? INeverCry 05:20, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Krd 05:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Omar.laag1

Resolved
Note: Indef blocked as spammer at enwiki. --Dэя-Бøяg 16:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
I doubt he'll be back. If he repeats his uploads, we can block him. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


LucadoFundao

Resolved

Bjarlin (talk) 21:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Blocked --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:46, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

DerpMeep

Resolved

Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 04:39, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked indefinitely. Jianhui67 talk★contribs 04:44, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Pinoy News Memories

Resolved

WayKurat (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked and nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:26, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Teddy Santiago

Resolved

WayKurat (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked and nuked. Sad case... --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:24, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done I deleted a lot of empty categories, created by Teddy Santiago. Taivo (talk) 08:48, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

عبد الصمد غوغو

Resolved

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 13:18, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked him/her for a week. Herbythyme deleted the unhelpful file. Taivo (talk) 15:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

USER:Weltverschwöhrung

Pending

Unter Blood "Kati" (Lachatte).jpg wurde von USER:Weltverschwöhrung am 19.01.2016 ein Bild hochgeladen, das gemäß Datum-Print im Bild am selben Tag aufgenommen wurde. Mit dem Hochladen des Bildes wird meines Erachtens gravierend gegen Persönlichkeitsrechte der abgebildeten Dame (und vermutlich auch gegen Urheberrechte) verstoßen. Die Betitelung "Signature of blood of ,Annabelle Lachatte´" ist m.E. geschmacklos, provokant und grenzt an Vandalismus.

Das Bild wurde auch in den Monatswettbewerb "Diagonal" eingebunden und hat dort m.E. ebenfalls nichts zu suchen.

Weltverschwöhrung hat sich zu seinem Tun erst am 19.01.2016 in der de.Wikipedia angemeldet und ist bereits hiermit in der de.wikipedia aufgefallen. Ich hege die Vermutung, dass der Benutzer mit diesem bereits gesperrten de.Benutzer Weltverschwörung identisch ist !!

Wolfgang Pehlemann (talk) 07:05, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Kann gut sein. Den Eintrag im Wettbewerb habe ich entfernt, eine Datei bereits geloescht. Die andere Datei ist in der Loeschdisku. Geschmacklos ist kein Loeschgrund, ein Verstoss gegen das Urhg schon. M.E. ist der Benutzer nicht willens und/oder in der Lage die Regeln auf Commons zu verstehen und zu befolgen. Wenn er/sie mehrfach auffaellt wird der Zugang gesperrt. LG, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:10, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Ras Benjih

Resolved

Techyan（Talk） 10:12, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Only junk and copyvios. This user didn't use probation time wisely. Files deleted. Yann (talk) 10:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Beaflowers

Resolved

Leyo 00:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked Beaflower for a week, also deleted some nonsense talk pages and reverted some other nonsense postings. Taivo (talk) 06:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
@Taivo: Well, I was thinking of an indef block since it's a vandal-only account (same as in en.wikipedia). Could you please keep an eye on the user after this week has ended? --Leyo 22:29, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

TimedText:Star_Spangled_Banner_instrumental.ogg.pl.srt

more than one IP

Pending

Persistent vandalisms from various user, various IP 93.105.182.171 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
150.254.147.32 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
159.205.150.72 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
94.254.129.69 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . Please semi-protect to prevent further IP vandalism. WTM (talk) 01:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 13:34, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Jobas

Pending

He also vandalized - in the same way - another page containing another package of his sock-puppets here using an IP-duck on 11 Feb 2015. This later page contains a package of his sockpuppets that he created in November 2012 several months after his first package of sockpuppets were blocked.

The user has also a history of sockpuppetry and inserting false information on the English Wikipedia: check here. As you can easily notice, this male sock-master has given the majority of his sockpuppets female names. This clearly indicates how sick this sock-master is. I encountered him for the first time on the Arabic Wikipedia where I was trolled by one of his female sockpuppets (he named her Tinaliza as I remember) which was used by him as a strawman sockpuppet in order to get me blocked.92.96.143.80 13:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked and reverted. Yann (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Stas1995

Resolved

Bratwurm (talk) 13:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Bratwurm, this here is wrong place for your complaint! First of all, we have no vandalism here, but good faith edits. So, if you have a problem with Stas1995, you should have reported it on COM:ANU instead. Second, I had a look now on both files and you can see that a) both are different shots (according to EXIF data on 15:31 resp. 15:33, b) both are QI with separate review process. So, even if they are very similar, none should be speedily deleted. Please discuss your issue on File talk:Tubifera ferruginosa - Fischeierschleimpilz - Lachsfarbener Schleimpilz - 03.jpg Stas1995 started for you.  Not done here. --A.Savin 14:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

IP-Vandalism

  • User: 95.49.57.206
  • Reasons for reporting: Vandalism, upload erotic photo in my diskusion

[25]] --31.1.24.78 19:01, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

31.1.24.78

Hi, I am kindly asking to watch this IP 31.1.24.78 (talk · contribs). I have seen that she or he did some obious vandalism (e.g. this and some others, Deutsche Bundesbahn ceased to exist at the end of 1993; and even if: those railcars are from Deutsche Reichsbahn (GDR), before they came into Deutsche Bahn). This IP also did some more edits with creating mixed-name categories such as Category:Nahverkehrswagen of Deutsche Bundesbahn and moving images there (instead of more specific Category:N-class coaches of Deutsche Bahn, which isn't wrong since today). I doubt that the new categories, which the IP creates, are consensual. All in all, those IP activities remind me of a wave of various "IP attacks" in summer 2015 (please check here for more details: User talk:Rodhullandemu/Archive 2#Train categories and Commons:Village pump/Archive/2015/08#August 08), in those days locomotives, this time railway coaches. Thanks a lot in advance, --Kleeblatt187 (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Please see also Commons:Village pump#Harzer Schmalspurbahnen. Kleeblatt187 (talk) 23:31, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

edit war

In picture File:Birth Certificate of Ketevan "Keke" Geladze.jpg seemd to be edit war by some IP's--Motopark (talk) 12:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

176.56.237.2

Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 17:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Никита-Родин-2002. They were busy over here as well. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 19:59, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

178.82.226.136

Pending

Appleincguy (talk) 20:52, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Appleincguy

✓ Done

--178.82.226.136 11:24, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

I'm just saying, this is incorrect. Appleincguy (talk) 14:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
I've requested that this user discuss the issues not simply revert edits. I've warned them that if they continue to simple revert they will be blocked & that calling someone a vandal is not discussion. --Herby talk thyme 15:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Continued to revert so now blocked for a day. To me the removal on categories seemed unexplained and inappropriate without explanation/discussion. --Herby talk thyme 15:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Suomen poliisin miekkatunnus.svg

Requesting file protection. The image uploaded by Fennoscandic is completely different and violates COM:Overwrite. Fry1989 eh? 21:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


Albatalad

212.200.65.113 22:01, 6 February 2016 (UTC) ✓ Done user blocked Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Dklfgjg

Sismarinho (talk) 17:26, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Vividel70

Pending
✓ Done Yann (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Juli m94

Pending
✓ Done User warned, some files deleted. Yann (talk) 18:02, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

Regions

Pending
  • User: Regions (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) 
  • Reasons for reporting: In the Spanish Wikipedia (es.wiki) the User:Regions was advised several times for "upload information with copyright" in a lot of articles, after continue doing the same, he was invited to leave Wikipedia. Now, i'm checking his uploads here in Wikimedia Commons and lot of them are copyright violations (some are easy to discover, other ones not). He poses as the author of the images, but they are actually stolen from internet. I think this is very danger for Wikimedia Commons. I don't know what we can do. If he lied about these images, maybe all of these uploads are fake. I think he should be blocked on here and we have to review all that uploads. Thank you. Loco085 msg 19:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

User removes deletion request tag from pictures

see [27] and [28], please inform--Motopark (talk) 10:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Reverted, notified via template, so it will appear in the correct language on the talk page. Revent (talk) 18:30, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Roi Casilana

✓ Done

✓ Done Last warning sent, files deleted. Yann (talk) 15:56, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Audiovisual Communicators Incorporated

{{Not done|Redundant}} ✓ Done

193.17.232.1

Resolved


Gisela coria

Resolved

Amitie 10g (talk) 04:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. If this account continue doing vandalism, should be blocked indefinitely. For now, I applied a block of one day. Érico (talk) 05:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

181.228.104.10

Pending

Amitie 10g (talk) 03:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

IP was given a 3-day block by Ezarate for 'Intimidation/Harassment' on the 26th. This is the wrong place to ask for a CU, but I don't think that this merits one unless you have an actual 'indication' of socking (actual 'similarity' to a particular account). Revent (talk) 17:04, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

User:Akashseo970

Resolved

genium ⟨✉⟩ 11:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Chaotic Good

Resolved

Alexey Tourbaevsky, — cheloVechek / talk 22:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Removing material from your own talk page is not vandalism, especially when it's over six months old and the conversation is obviously long completed. Revent (talk) 03:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Generally, archiving is preferred over simple deletion, but I think, that such kind of conversation can be deleted also. Taivo (talk) 09:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Rob Urbz

Resolved
✓ Done All uploads are deleted. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Victoria in her natural positon.png

Someone please delete this: this was uploaded and stuck into a vile BLP violation on en-wiki, where I've blocked the user indefinitely. I can't post the content of the article in public. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:30, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done, deleted by Túrelio with reason "content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack". Taivo (talk) 09:07, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Surely this uploader has forfeited their account as well? They got shown the door at English Wikipedia. —LX (talk, contribs) 20:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

User:144.136.88.8

Resolved

Mediatus (talk) 08:27, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Now blocked for a week. Taivo (talk) 22:50, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Copyvio Image

Resolved

Could someone please delete this image? It is a copyvio of this. Thank you. Nepaxt (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. --Túrelio (talk) 21:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


User:Lindaseguin39

Resolved

Mirokado (talk) 00:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

It is clear that neither I nor the previous contributor Mediatus understood how to make a report from the instructions, we both gave the User: prefix to the name we provided. Perhaps using the heading "User name:" rather than "User:" would help. --Mirokado (talk) 00:19, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Rehman deleted both Linda's contributions as spam, but choosed not to block her. At least, I warned her. Taivo (talk) 07:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

User:GodofMediatus = User:Jermboy27

Resolved

Mediatus (talk) 02:03, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked him indefinitely. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

User:98.110.230.39 = User:Jermboy27

Resolved

Look now here: [36]. He is blocked with this IP address at the German Wikipedia for 14 days: [37] Mediatus (talk) 02:15, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked the IP for a week. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

85.84.42.53

Resolved
✓ Done I blocked the IP for 3 days and deleted the talkpage. Taivo (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

128.71.*.* and 128.70.*.* and 95.30.*.*

Resolved

Insider (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

It is no longer necessary. --Insider (talk) 05:33, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Bigboi123456789

Resolved

Grand-Duc (talk) 04:27, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I deleted the photo, but did not block him. I'll warn him instead. Taivo (talk) 07:10, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

193.17.244.2

Resolved

Mazbln (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done. Since this is a static IP, I applied a three-day block. Érico (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed it. It's even from the Bundestag (German parliament) server. Very strange. We will see whether the block will help. --Mazbln (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Might be a coordinated action, as there is similar strange behaviour, especially agressive trash-talk by:

Strangely there seems to be some association to account Perseus1984 (talk · contribs), as he suddenly employs same trash-language[38] and even restored the above mentioned IP's aggressive trash-talk against his own upload[39] and [40]. No idea whether the account has been compromised. --Túrelio (talk) 22:19, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Charlice2784

Resolved

czar 02:12, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Nicking882 just showed up too (diff)—some swift intervention would be useful here... czar 00:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
User:Aarmando444, same pattern. These users did upload free flickr images having added a spam weblink at the file desc of each image. This didn't happen accidentally but was intended. Therefore these can be treated as spam-only accounts. --Achim (talk) 22:09, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Blocked them indef, thanks to Czar. --Achim (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Gohkenytp

Resolved

Mediatus (talk) 12:31, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Dan Stiffy

Resolved

Orwellianist (talk) 20:00, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Blocked indef by Denniss. --Achim (talk) 21:04, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


Shikhaadvocate

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 13:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done All contributions are vandalism. Indefinitely blocked. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Ітті5 Тіттеп 3456

Resolved

Stepro (talk) 16:05, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Didym (talk) 16:14, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiAyuda15

Resolved

Oscar_. (talk) 12:57, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Last warning sent, file deleted. Yann (talk) 12:59, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

69.115.75.25

Resolved

69.115.75.25 (talk · contribs) Mass creation of hoaxes and empty cats, blocked with 3 months in en.wp. /St1995 14:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Empty cats deleted, no more for now. Preventional block is pointless at the moment. Ankry (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
User continues creating empty cats, so blocked for 1 month

✓ Done Ankry (talk) 00:10, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Saul2002

Resolved

Sismarinho (talk) 08:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Uploads have been deleted, user asked Turelio for help. No need for any blocks right now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Venezuelanmaraca

Resolved

Henxter (talk) 10:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

@Henxter: Oh come on, can you please don't report his socks here? Because first of all, he was never a vandal here. Removing "uploaded by Russavia" is not vandalism, he wanted it. Second, it is useless, because his socks will be globally locked by the WMF. Now, his sock is now globally locked, so no further action is needed (and never will be). ★ Poké95 12:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
@Henxter: Hey, just a note, the more you revert, the more I patrol. ;) ★ Poké95 13:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Why are you supporting Russavia and supporting ongoing vandalism? Andy Dingley (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Huh, what vandalism have he done? That replacing his own category with the check categories template? That's not vandalism, he wanted it. ★ Poké95 13:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

I dont't know what preceded al this; and if this is not the right place to report this kind of behaviour I want to apologize. Conclusion: it's just trolling behaviour to attire attention, better to be ignored? Henxter (talk) 13:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, just ignore those (I will handle it by patrolling). ★ Poké95 23:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:45, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Tydero

Pending

Paweł 'pbm' Szubert (talk) 11:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

 Not done If the "sandbox" request fails, the user should be blocked. But I do not think any urgent action is needed as there is no recent activity. Ankry (talk) 12:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

67.215.241.98

Resolved

★ Poké95 12:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for 3 days. Ankry (talk) 12:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


Fagerstrong

Pending

Laberkiste (talk) 02:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Rudolf Sniggleburger

Resolved

Laber□T 13:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

User:DannyLongSCH

Resolved

Laber□T 13:37, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

 Not done Not blatant vandalism, consider reporting to COM:AN/U instead. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Milenpanda

Resolved

Laber□T 14:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done User blocked, some uploads speedy deleted, the others are nominated for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Rayazan

Resolved
I withdraw (partially) my request because user requested deletion of that pages and stopped after warnings (at enwiki). Maybe he confused several tools or else and, by now, I would assume good faith. Btw, I'll watch in case of further promo contribs. Uhm... Anyway, this unused file is useless for project scope, but his portrait may IMHO stay as user page image. Note that the portrait is unused and I don't know if unused UP files may stay on commons. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:11, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
I restore my report: Rayazan, once stopped, created a sockpuppet (DUCK) named Chillax96 (not registered here), to create again the same page (en:Rayazan, en:User:Chillax96 and en:User:Chillax96/sandbox), despite any warning. He used again that couple of files uploaded here, so... I assumed good faith some hours ago, but is now clear that he's only using WP and Commons for his personal spam, in spite of any message or else. I request the indef ban, and the deletion of the files. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
✓ blocked indef for xwiki spam. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:16, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Joachim voss

Resolved

DCB (talk) 19:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Final warning sent, next copyvio will result in a block. --Didym (talk) 21:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Jacques680

Resolved
Left a note on their talk page and added a new Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cjones934 request. Thanks for notifying. --Achim (talk) 16:59, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Hughvic8

Resolved
They're likely connected, as one has edited the other's to move the spam around.
✓ Blocked indef: Belongs to spam gang, see Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Cjones934. --Achim (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Nadia Ettahry

Resolved

DCB (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Upload deleted, user warned. Ankry (talk) 12:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


User:144.136.88.8

Resolved
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:53, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Ragilnih

Resolved
 Not done Most of their uploads seem to be below threshold of originality. I do not think any admin action is needed here. Ankry (talk) 04:54, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Hjkhensinki (NSFW)

Someone might want to show Hjkhensinki (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads)  the door and nuke their copyvio fake celebrity porn uploads. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done After looking his/her contributions, I decided to block him/her indefinitely. At first, the files are almost surely protected with copyright, at second, they are out of scope. All these files are deleted now. Taivo (talk) 13:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Mohamed Rayazan

Resolved
Nobody has done anything during 3 days. That's probably because Mohamed Rayazan has not made any edits in Commons. Rayazan made only 2 edits: he uploaded 2 personal files, which were deleted and he was indefinitely blocked for spamming, although I think, that this was not the case. I personally think, that no action is needed now. If Mohamed Rayazan starts to edit, then maybe block is appropriate. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

SteelGargoyle and Joshua M. Harrell

Resolved

IronGargoyle (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done SteelGargoyle made an unblock request. I declined it, because he was obvious sockpuppet of ceiling fan vandal. Also I reblocked him without right to send e-mail and edit userpage. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I asked a steward to globally lock those two users, because they are sockpuppets of the globally locked user David Beals. ★ Poké95 08:34, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
✓ Globally locked by Bennylin. --★ Poké95 09:27, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

72.93.87.56

Resolved
I requested a steward to globally block the IP. ★ Poké95 01:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. --Dэя-Бøяg 10:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Global block  Not done. Please report again if Jermboy returns. Thanks, ★ Poké95 04:21, 30 April 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Blocked for one month. @Pokéfan95: See my comment below, don't set requests to not done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

ShanksofWessex

Resolved

WayKurat (talk) 02:31, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done The user has not been sent a last warning yet, so I gave them a last warning. One more copyvio, and they will be blocked by an administrator. (At hindi ko pala alam na may ibang pang Pilipino na tumutulong ibura ang mga copyright violations...) Salamat, ★ Poké95 02:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 Info They also removed all the warnings placed on their talk page, so I rollbacked their edits and warned them not to remove warnings. --★ Poké95 03:08, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 Info All files nuked by Benoit Rochon, Thuresson, and Christian Ferrer. --★ Poké95 04:58, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 Comment I tagued a copyvio after your warning but did no block the user because the file was uploaded a bit before the warning. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
@Pokéfan95: This is administrators' noticeboard, please don't set requests as done or not done. Administrators are evaluating if a action is needed or not. The same goes for the other AN/*. I watched this now for a while and i find it quite disruptive - to be honest - especially because your experience in that area is limited and we have to correct you (for example the not done you added above). --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Ninjamasterswordthesamurai

Resolved

Mcpusc (talk) 07:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)


user:Kumiokosock5

✓ Done

He has 61 entries https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kumiokosock5 starting today. I think a complet block would be the best solution. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 21:17, 3 May 2016 (UTC) Jörgens.Mi Talk 21:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

  • And by the way, don't forget to ask a steward to globally lock his sockpuppets. :) But I don't recommend doing it at m:SRG, instead, do it privately at IRC. ★ Poké95 23:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

69.178.194.70

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 08:56, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Pinging Steinsplitter (since they rollback this IP's edits too) ★ Poké95 09:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Blocked by JuTa. JuTa, I recommend extending the block to one month. 2 hours doesn't seem enough. And nuke the pages they created too. Thanks, ★ Poké95 09:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Please revoke talk page access too. They are still vandalizing their own talk page. Thanks, ★ Poké95 09:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
18 hours... Seriously? ★ Poké95 09:39, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
FYI: Globally blocked. café --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:22, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Valeriu ioan12

Completed

jdx Re: 18:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

168.8.249.247

Resolved

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done ~riley (talk) 03:36, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Tusolotusa

Resolved

Amitie 10g (talk) 02:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Poke did the rollback already, I blocked indef. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Ebyabe

Resolved

72.64.9.36 20:50, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Hazen89

Resolved

Nothing but attack images. Ohnoitsjamie (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

All uploads deleted. I planned to block this user indefinitely (obviously a disruptive sockpuppet), but I couldn't figure out how to get {{Blocked}} to format "indefinitely" correctly, so I reduced the block to "only" 100 years. Nyttend (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Lol, 100 years? Well, I think {{Indefblockeduser}} is appropriate in this case (don't forget to substitute the template). ★ Poké95 00:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Actually a little extra; 100 years becomes "1 century and 18 hours". So you'll have to wait most of a day once your block expires in 2116 :-) Thanks for the template link; I've not encountered it before. Nyttend (talk) 02:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

193.219.54.101

Pending

jdx Re: 07:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked the IP for a month, because it vandalizes Commons for long time. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Reinaldo Palencia

Oscar_. (talk) 00:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

I have deleted five images as being copyright violations. It is likely that the remaining files should also be deleted for the same reason. Thuresson (talk) 22:07, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Deleted copyvios, one image is up for deletion request. Thuresson (talk) 15:59, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Amin.amin62

Resolved
✓ Done Only two uploads, both copyvios. I'll delete them both. I warned the user. Taivo (talk) 06:46, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Elidebacianino

Resolved
Update #1: His talk is a long list of copyvio tags, all ignored. For example, the fist file I searched (File:Bolli.jpg) is a copyvio from this website and it was still deleted in december. File:Marscianese.jpg is a copyvio from this website. File:SuperFersinone.jpg is a copyvio from this website. File:Palio Marsciano.jpg is a screenshot of this YouTube video (the shot appears searching for "Palio Marsciano" on Google). File:Fratelli Ceci .jpg is a copyvio from this website. Due to the name of the files deleted in December (listed into his talk), about rivers and some panoramas around the Italian town of Marsciano, I suspect that all the files he uploaded are copyright violations. My search of files, above, was just a survey. I also suspect that, despite any warning, he uploaded this files again and again: File:Morcella.jpeg, File:Mulino-della-morcella.jpg and File:Morcella (1).jpg (deleted in december), have a name related to File:La chiusa di Morcella distrutta.jpg. File:Piena-nestore.jpg, File:Nestore3.jpg and File:Nestore Marsciano.jpeg (del in december) have the same name of File:Fiume Nestore.jpeg and File:Nestore.jpg. File:FERSINONE.jpg has the same name of File:Fersinone.jpg (see also File:Torrente Fersinone.jpeg, File:Cavalloni Fersinone.jpeg, File:MiFersinone.jpg). For the massive copyvio, the constant upload (and re-upload) ignoring any warning and deletion, I recommend the deletion of all the files and, of course, the indef block. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:46, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
Update #2: I found it:Wikipedia:Utenti problematici/Elidebacianino (seems to be the Italian version of en:WP:ANI). For what I've understood the user, on itwiki, has a problem of massive POV-pushing (and other kind of vandalisms, as the removal of sources and info without a reason) despite any warning, also acting as anon IP. At this point, certifying that Elidebacianino is using (last update 5 days ago) Commons to improve his disruptive editing on another WM Project (itwiki), ignore any message (here and there), I'm tempted to ask for the global block on meta as crosswiki vandal. 208 (it.wp) 32 (commons) edits, followed by a long list of warnings are IMHO many, and I don't think he hasn't understood the problmes with his contributions. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:14, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done I deleted some copyvios and blocked him/her for a month. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Fixpol

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked 24 hours to familiarise him/self with COM:NOTCENSORED. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Dr.Koo

Pending

Achim (talk) 19:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

195.194.74.148

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Soft block for one week. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

198.49.31.131

Sting (talk) 17:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Nobody available to get this Troll blocked? Likely somebody bored at a public Library in Birmingham. --Denniss (talk) 21:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked for 1 week. --Achim (talk) 13:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

The pictures used on the page are disturbing, any Picture of the Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) should be removed.

208.87.234.202 18:12, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

 Not done Longstanding consensus is that images of Mohammed will not be deleted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Dangeritem

jdx Re: 07:02, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done: Blocked indef, vandalism only account, also active on en:wp. --Achim (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Godway571

Please block Godway571 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads)  – vandalism only account (here and on English Wikipedia). —LX (talk, contribs) 22:33, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done Forever blocked. Taivo (talk) 22:39, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Szm0001

Resolved

jdx Re: 08:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

His brand new incarnation: Szm1422954669. --jdx Re: 15:13, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
✓ Done The account is globally locked. I'll delete all his/her contributions. Taivo (talk) 16:56, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Miraclemoving

Resolved

jdx Re: 08:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

I warned him and will delete all his contributions. For today that's enough. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Shirlysureshkumar

Resolved

jdx Re: 10:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked her for a week. Jdx and Mabalu reverted all her edits. Taivo (talk) 17:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

158.129.160.66

Pending

jdx Re: 09:07, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Surely this is the same Lithuanian vandal. Taivo (talk) 17:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Next IP number of this guy: 193.219.55.113 --jdx Re: 08:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

69.115.75.25 (talk · contribs)

Mass creation of empty cats and adding hoax categories into pages after many warnings. Blocked in en-wp. Also using sockpuppets 69.115.72.88 (talk · contribs), 69.115.66.43 (talk · contribs). Static IPs. /St1995 13:12, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done I blocked all three and deleted some empty categories. Taivo (talk) 21:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

TRANSSURVEY

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 06:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

龍氚天下

Resolved

578985s (talk) 09:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

DecodeD

Resolved

jdx Re: 14:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Blocked indef. INeverCry 16:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Med2911

Resolved

Choess (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Spammy uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 20:46, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Lukkagrassia

Resolved

Magnus (talk) 08:09, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

User blocked, edits cleaned up. Storkk (talk) 08:56, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

‎Ip80.123

cross wiki heavy vandalism and insulting.

see also notice on Meta about 4 other vandal accounts, editing today since the morning. -jkb- (talk) 09:08, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:14, 1 July 2016 (UTC)


Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive_8&oldid=200743508"