Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Miguelmerida

Resolved

Indeedous (talk) 10:39, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Migue Angel López Merida, Miguel Angel Lopez Merida, and Miguelmerida blocked. INeverCry 17:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

88.131.31.186

Resolved

Jee 15:18, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. See AN/B. --Alan (talk) 15:38, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. Jee 15:40, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

109.3.192.42

Persistent vandal. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 15:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done by Natuur12 --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

108.169.0.223

Came from somewhere, not nowhere. Obviously he has something against Russavia. --(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 07:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. --A.Savin 07:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

17 times vandalism this morning on file:Steck.jpg about 'Hitler and penisses' (and things like that) - Richardkw (talk) 12:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)


Victory is mine again

NawlinWiki (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Uploads nuked, user blocked (indef) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:59, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! Would you mind doing the same for User:LesleybexsCarter and his images? NawlinWiki (talk) 15:31, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

198.110.174.175

Resolved
On NL-Wikipedia it is possible that a moderator hides names and things like that. Is that possible on Commons aswell? (see the file above) - Kind regards, - Richardkw (talk) 14:15, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done by Elcobbola --Alan (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

XxElsanxx

Resolved

Codc (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Kchs

Kchs (talk · contribs), likely a sockpuppet of Ckvin2u (talk · contribs), uploads a copyvio after noticing the same image has been deleted as a copyvio. That's intentionally violating an important Commons policy (after warnings) and should not be tolerated.    FDMS  4    15:07, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Uploads nuked, User blocked indef. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:38, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

spambot, see also [2] /St1995 20:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Tegel globally blocked 94.153.10.122 (expires 20:15, 4 May 2014) with the following comment: Cross-wiki spam: spambot. --Alan (talk) 20:56, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Carlosrycbar

Resolved

ireas (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done - file deleted and user blocked for 1 week. JurgenNL (talk) 11:01, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

108.210.154.192

108.210.154.192 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - unconstructive/test edits; warned. /St1995 14:05, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

78.94.133.60

78.94.133.60 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - repeatedly nonsense and piggish Edits --Trzęsacz (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:39, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

65.254.225.129

Resolved

65.254.225.129 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log Spambot (see also deleted contributions) /St1995 19:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Originally indef blocked by Hedwig in Washington (talk contribs blocks protections deletions moves rights rights changes), and I changed block duration to a year, as we usually don't indef IPs. Revicomplaint? 08:23, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

211.30.211.14

211.30.211.14 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - vandalism /St1995 21:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. --A.Savin 21:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

108.210.154.192

108.210.154.192 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - vandalism-only IP /St1995 21:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. --A.Savin 21:24, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

5.149.212.198

5.149.212.198 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - spambot, previously blocked /St1995 18:12, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 18:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Sexdealer

Resolved

— Cheers, JackLee talk 04:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. --A.Savin 06:00, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

186.108.173.106

Resolved

Maxxl2 - talk 15:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

removes speedy deletion tag and deleted deletion request--Motopark (talk) 14:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Are you sure you have the correct user? Mohammad Muaaz Bin Zaka hasn't edited since 2011. Эlcobbola talk 14:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
Correct right user user:Muhammad Muaaz Bin Zaka--Motopark (talk) 14:52, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
I don't think action is required. You're nominating his user page, which seems perfectly in scope to me, for deletion. Removing a notice from a file nominated for deletion is problematic because potential reusers of the file won't receive a warning, but here there's no real harm, especially since the deletion request is unscathed. Эlcobbola talk 16:02, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
@Elcobbola: Userpage spam is not in scope. page deleted user blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:25, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
@Steinsplitter Indeed, but that's not what this was. You'll also be deleting several admin user pages, then? Эlcobbola talk 16:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:14, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


VÁNDALC0CK

Resolved
Locked globally. Socks as well. Glaisher (talk) 17:42, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done globally by stewards. Alan (talk) 18:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

紫菜汤圆

Pending

Siyuwj (talk) 13:09, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done All files deleted. User warned. Yann (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done User warned, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 13:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

Could somebody add the above template as a preload to the edit link of {{Administrators' noticeboard}}?    FDMS  4    13:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Again Copyright violations: User blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 23:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


2602:306:CD29:AC00:1133:4ED4:B728:26B4

Resolved

Odysseus1479 (talk) 04:56, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

decided all nonsense DRs as keep. Because it too late now it makes no sense to block this (dynamic) IP now. --JuTa 05:17, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

C-perspect-bur4

C-perspect-bur4 (talk · contribs) is uploading files with nonsensical names, nonsensical descriptions and at best categorizes them in nonsensical categories. Files are not used. This seems like vandalism. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:29, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done I will delete all his/her uploads and warn him/her. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

188.25.156.132

188.25.156.132 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log - vandal\spambot /St1995 20:55, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:59, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Dkankeriffic

Resolved

~Kevin Payravi (Talk) 18:13, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)

AdityaNofrianda

BrightRaven (talk) 09:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:28, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Biatorb

Hi. I just examined edits of User:Biatorb which appear to be purely disruptive: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Biatorb

In page "Old maps of Vojvodina" this user removed relevant category "Old maps of Serbia": [4]. After this edit was reverted by me, Biatorb removed it again: [5]. And again after I asked for explanation on talk page: [6]. As you can see there is only my comment on talk page but no answer from Biatorb: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Old_maps_of_Vojvodina

However, after examining edits of this user, I noticed a long term disruption in several pages, such are these:

It appears that this user is involved in long term revert-warring over these same pages in long time period, just check page histories and diffs of user Biatorb there:

For some, reason, Biatorb here continuosly removing category "Old maps of Romania" since February 2013: [9].

See same edit in August 2013: [10]

Same in May 2014: [11].

As I counted, Biatorb edited that page as many as 46 times, always removing category "Old maps of Romania" from it. Biatorb obviously battling there his revert war with few other users, but as this map shows part of present-day Romania, category "Old maps of Romania" is relevant for it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maramures_Josephinische_Landesaufnahme_1782-1785_Background.jpg

Thus, edits of user Biatorb appear to be pure vandalism. PANONIAN (talk) 18:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

✓ blocked and protected Maps protected, User blocked for one month (only). Next time infinite. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:27, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Chicareli

Resolved

Jee 09:50, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

User vandalizing maps of Serbia

Pending
  • User: Nikswerdhond (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: This user is constantly vandalizing maps of Serbia, and according to list of contributions that user's only activity on Wikipedia. User is changing maps to show Kosovo as independent state even though Kosovo is not a member of the United Nations. Nobody can insist that Kosovo is represented as independent state since there are many self-proclaimed states and it would a complete chaos on Wikipedia if their supporters would be allowed to update existing maps in this way. Updating new maps can be tolerated up to some point, but changing existing maps is absolutely unacceptable. This user definitely needs to prevented from making any further changes on Wikipedia. Tresnjevo (talk) 10:26, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
    • Welcome to the reality, I reverted YOUR changes were appropriate. Don't start this edit-warring again, this was deemed settled some months ago. --Denniss (talk) 16:33, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

ːːIf you want to have maps of serbia that you find "reality", upload new ones, Deniss, do not edit war with vandals. Otherwise, you are vandalising same as this user above, as that is not vikipedia rules. Those maps was changed all over the vikipedia, that is not normal, that is vandal. Create new maps, and other vikipedias will use them, if they want. --Anastan (talk) 22:00, 5 May 2014 (UTC) ːːWhere was this "deemed settled"? Post here that for us to see. I have understood that original image cannot be chenged here, and that new must be send to use here. --Anastan (talk) 22:10, 5 May 2014 (UTC) ːːːI talked with people, and now i know you do not can replace this images, Denis. Commons:OVERWRITE If another editor thinks that a change is not an improvement (even if the editor making the change thinks it minor), the change can be reverted. Once a change has been reverted, the new image should be uploaded under a new filename (unless the reverting editor explicitly or implicitly agrees to the contested change). A big number of peoples reverted yur edits, so you cannot edit it anymore! --Anastan (talk) 22:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Denniss, now you are informed about official guideline about overwriting files. Next time you revert any of these images, you will be reported for vandalism as well. Tresnjevo (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Blablurb and threaths, you really need to enter the real word. If you continue to overwrite maps with your fantasy version I'll lock these images. Many images already have alternative (Serb fantasy) versions. Please tell me if there's one missing and I may split it from the existing old ones.--Denniss (talk) 05:57, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Please visit Google maps and tell me if you can see Abkhazia as independent state? No, you cannot see it even though it's de facto independent, and in matter of fact much more independent than Kosovo. Reason for this is that Abkhazia is not member of UN. Period. If you want to create new map for Albanian Wikipedia where Paris is part of Albania, just go ahead and do it. But you cannot promote your nationalist views on maps that other users created. Once again, you are warned (nobody is threatening here) about consequences if you repeat the same thing again. Tresnjevo (talk) 06:34, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

FYI:
Whether Google Maps indicates that a country exists or not can only be additional evidence. Disputed is disputed and has to be treated on Commons as such. Therefore adding Kosovo, Abkhazia, and South Ossetia as such is common sense and a necessity to provide accurate information / maps. This doesn't sanction an edit war. The logical conclusion would be to create two versions: One where the disputed part is indicated as part of another country, and one where it is not. If there's a problem with an admin, one can always file a complaint here. What shall it be? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:22, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Its interesting how none see the problem. We all agree that Kosovo should have ther maps, but Serbia must have them also. So, i will now restore original maps, and all of you are welcome to create new ones with not kosovo situation. Original maps, that are in use all over will stay as they are, and new ones can be uploaded. And i would love to see who will block me for respecting Commons:OVERWRITE!! --Anastan (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

2A02:810D:10C0:6F4:6D77:439C:D035:B13A

Resolved

Steindy (talk) 18:05, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Steindy, du hast beim Wiederherstellen deines Beitrages einen fremden Beitrag überschrieben. Deswegen hat die IP – meiner Meinung nach zurecht – revertiert. // Steindy, you deleted an other post while restoring/adding your post. That’s why the anonymous user reverted your edits (justified, in my opinion). — ireas (talk) 18:11, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
Bullshit. It is vandalism by User:Steindy who is deleting other users' messages as those by Artbuero, Steinsplitter, Victor Lledo, Prosfilaes and Baronfuzz. --2A02:810D:10C0:6F4:6D77:439C:D035:B13A 18:14, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Closed. No vandalism by the IP. --A.Savin 18:16, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Endcunda

Resolved
✓ Done 3 days. Please extend it if you think more block is appropriate. Revicomplaint? 12:34, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Mr Wiki Pro

Resolved
  • User: Mr Wiki Pro (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: User continues to remove categories
  • Examplesː17:44, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Ehrengrab Elisabeth Selbert (Friedhof Niederzwehren).jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124527300 by 91.65.49.45 (talk)) (current)
  • 17:43, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-38)‎ . . File:Elisabeth Selbert (timbre RFA).jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124526806 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet) (current)
  • 17:42, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-30)‎ . . File:DBP 1987 1338 Elisabeth Selbert.jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124526867 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet) (current)
  • 17:42, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Frauen 120 Pf Elisabeth Selbert.png ‎ (Undo revision 124526895 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet) (current)
  • 17:41, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Ehrengrab Elisabeth Selbert (Friedhof Niederzwehren).jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124527116 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not exist yet)
  • 17:40, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Väter Mütter des Grundgesetzes.png ‎ (Undo revision 124527065 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not yet exist) (current)
  • 17:38, 21 May 2014 (diff | hist) . . (-31)‎ . . File:Elisabethselbertgesamtschule.jpg ‎ (Undo revision 124526946 by 91.65.49.45 (talk) Category does not yet exist) (current)
  • Reported by 91.65.49.45 18:06, 21 May 2014 (UTC)


This is a stupid bad faith report. The IP was adding non existent category to articles and I was removing them because we dont want loads of red link categorys!--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
I count 7 vandal actions. Is that not enough to report you? And who should repair your damages if not you? 91.65.49.45 19:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
"Vandal actions" that's a stupid thing to say. It me who spent ages clearing up the crap you left around. It's just a complete waste of my time!--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 20:18, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
The two of you should get a nice little break from Commons for edit warring. A simple question would have done it.


Q: Are you going to create the categories?
A: Yes or No
Simple as pie. But noooo, you guys feel better wasting our time and butt heads. If any of you appear here again with something like this there will be consequences. Grow up and talk to each other! Dear IP: PLEASE! Next time create the categories first.

✓ Categories replaced, no admin-action needed (yet) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

The vandal has claimed, that red links/categories are not allowed. Is that true? 91.65.49.45 20:32, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
What good would a red link do? And for calling the other user a vandal you get a little Commons break to calm down. Drink a cup of tea and figure out how to behave her properly. You may want to get a little stash of teabags since you'll pause for a week now.
✓ Now admin action needed, IP blocked for a week for harassment and obvious lack of tea --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Sexy turds

Resolved

Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:21, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

220.235.129.22

Resolved

Mariofan13 (talk) 06:57, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

200.96.57.12

Resolved

Biólogo 32 What? 21:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Done, blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Antony Kiriakoglou

Resolved

BrightRaven (talk) 09:54, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:00, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons_fair_use_upload_bot

Resolved

Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 06:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

The mayor problem is the missing discussion an documentation of removed pictures. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 06:11, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
No idea what you see as a problem. I (and probably other admin colleagues and users) automatically "invoke" this bot by tagging files with {{Fair use delete}}. I do this for files on Commons which are currently in use on :en Wikipedia, but have been requested for deletion due to copyright/licensing problems. I.e., the files would be deleted from Commons anyway. --Túrelio (talk) 06:42, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Well, these pictures have been in use for long time without any probs. If there in use on EN:WP maybe one issue how the files are handled by commons to make it other projects avail. But the issue is even larger. What if pictures from commons were found in the web without reference. This would change the owner and donator of the picture to a violator of copyright if the external use does not give a reference to commons. A deletion requires to have a discussion log to make the process visible for the owners. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 07:09, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
"for long time" - no, this is not generally true, as the history of the files and the reasons for deletion are quite variable. Though I may repeat myself, these are two rather separate issues: this concerns only files which would be deleted from Commons anyway, because they violate our licensing policy. Whether this is performed via a speedy-deletion or a regular (slow) deletion-request depends on the circumstances (and a bit on the nominator). A blatant or clear copyvio is of course speedy-deleted, even if it has been in use on a project or remained on Commons for some time — thanks to our efforts at recent-upload patroling, this happens not so often. Besides, the deletion-logs are preseved anyway, though for the speedy-deletions they are less visible.
The fair-use-to-:en process is just a service for a subgroup of the above mentioned files which are is use on :en. Of course, if other projects have a similar broad fair-use policy as :en, they might also install a similar process, which would then need to be integrated in our processes. --Túrelio (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
It looks like there's no vandal on this bot. Please contact bot operator if you need bot fix. PS, Image was on Commons without problem != image has no problem. Revicomplaint? 03:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Asiancock

Resolved

Nazeem Hari Suriya

  • disappointed, user with no wiki experience and communication problems. I see no reason for any action if no further problem with the user appear. Ankry (talk) 07:19, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Mr Wiki Pro

Resolved

82.141.126.126 19:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Actually if the IP bothered to read the message i left on his talk page and the edit summaries he would know I have nominated the page for deletion (see Commons:Deletion requests/TimedText:United States Navy Band - Maamme.ogg.en.srt--Mr Wiki Pro (talk) 19:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
Page deleted --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Alvesgaspar

Resolved

Mariofan13 (talk) 19:50, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

 Mariofan13: Check your edits first and don't spam the AN board with nonsense. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:15, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

93.50.115.250

Resolved

Signed by User:$oliton (talk) 14:26, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

 blocked (1 week) Do we need to add a CU? I blocked Pava indef for edit warring after warnings (not the first time), copyvios, and abusing multiple accounts. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:01, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
I ran a CU and did not identify any sleeper accounts. Эlcobbola talk 14:23, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
OK. Done for now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:54, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

SALTI FAN

Resolved

Amitie 10g (talk) 19:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Uploads deleted and user warned. The user has not continued to upload files, so I am not blocking at this time. User should be blocked if uploads resume. Эlcobbola talk 20:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Futbase

Pending

Principal adjoint (talk) 10:05, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

User blocked. Ankry (talk) 10:15, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
@Principal adjoint: A consensus about images edited by Futbase is required. Can you point any? Ankry (talk) 11:03, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
The files changed already exist for most version without logo. Principal adjoint (talk) 11:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

178.183.135.65

Resolved

Abderitestatos (talk) 09:37, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Blocked one week. --Krd 09:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)


AlvaFereday

Resolved

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 17:37, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:51, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Cvbnapple

Resolved

Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:51, 1 July 2014 (UTC) PS: Second time

Blocked --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

Havang(nl) (talk) 12:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

Marking as resolved. Revicomplaint? 08:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

68.190.2.124

Resolved
Marking as resolved. Revicomplaint? 08:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Waisenbube/IP

Resolved

__Simsalabimbam (talk) 14:30, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

I'm failing to see the issue, other than that they are uploading over your uploads. Are these copyright violations, are you reporting an upload war? Please be more specific. Thanks, Tiptoety talk 19:29, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
it's the same behaviour as in this case: [18] (2012). --Simsalabimbam (talk) 05:38, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but everything is Stale. No action taken. Tiptoety talk 02:11, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
[19] 2003:50:AD35:5278:F1A9:AB04:6812:A6E1 07:09, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Devinorte

Resolved
✓ Done blocked and nuked. Thanks for the info! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:46, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hishashanka

Pending

Amartyabag (talk) 16:51, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done User warned, copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Ranj

Resolved
✓ Done I left a warning and some info on his talk page. I don't think a block is needed at this point. For good measure the filename is edit protected as well. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanx a lot. Anyway, I'll watch in case of eventual other edits as this. Greets. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:25, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Strorm

Resolved
  • User: Strorm (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: Repeatedly uploading copyrighted images, ripped from the web, as own work, in spite of multiple warnings on their talk page. In one case uploading the same image again and again, each time having it speedily deleted as a copyvio. The copyvio images uploaded here have been added to articles on en-WP, where he has now been blocked indefinitely for repeated copyvios.

Thomas.W talk 14:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

✓ Blocked for a week. Yann (talk) 16:30, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Patmagno

Resolved

Blakegripling ph (talk) 02:06, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done 1 week block. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:28, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

72.209.215.243

Resolved

HelenOnline 18:00, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Joseso19

Resolved

Amitie 10g (talk) 03:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done All files deleted. He already have a warning, will be blocked if uploading more copyvios. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
This is clearly an account created for vandalize and still uploading vandalical pictures. Please Block him inmediatelly, delete all his uploads and hide all his editions. Already blocked at es:Wikipedia. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked indef, 70 (c) porn pics from the net today. Indef blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Meerta

Resolved
 Support At least one month block, until the drama is over. Yann (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked for 1 month per Yann and Steinsplitter w/ tp access removed. I also looked at this acct's edits on en.wiki, and almost all of them were to 1 ongoing dispute, just as they are here. If any other admin disagrees with this extended block, please feel free to unblock or change it. INeverCry 18:57, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

173.60.192.129

Resolved

Vydra (talk) 11:23, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

I've removed the DR from your userpage, deleted the DR page, and removed it from the daily listing. I also reverted the talkpage notice. The above IP looks to be dynamic, so a block is useless. I'll keep your user page on my watchlist, and protect it if another attack occurs. INeverCry 18:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Eloquence

Resolved

Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:33, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

  •  Not done - Yes he should have made a proper atribution and yes he should have included the right licese tagg. Yes he didnot behave himself elswhere. But all of this no reason to report him for vandalisme when he simply misunderstood Commons policy's. No need to dramatise things even more. Natuur12 (talk) 21:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
This image was uploaded in 2012 (!). I would not block anyone for a two years old copyvio. --A.Savin 22:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Seriously Alchemist, you're trying to get a WMF staffer banned over a single 2 year old copyvio? -mattbuck (Talk) 22:44, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
I answer in german, because my englich is to small: ich habe erst Heute von dem Bild erfahren. Und nun frage ich mich: wofür haben wir denn unsere Lizenzbausteine und die Lizenzbedingungen, wenn diejenigen die es am besten wissen müßten diese einfach ignorieren! Auch ein Eloquence muß sich an die hier aufgestellten Regeln halten. Ich sehe Lizenzverstöße als eine sehr ernste Sache an! Nun könnt ihr machen was ihr wollt/now you can do what you like. Bye, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
I have no tolerance for this. That's cow-cookies. No action to be taken, thread closed. Holy cow! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
That's about I'm thinking about: no more image donation for Commons/Wikipedia. It is only a license ... we can ignore it, unimportant ...
Resolved
. Bye. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Verklage die WMF auf die üblichen Lizenzgebühren da sie wissentlich gegen die vergebene Lizenz verstoßen haben. Keine Gnade bei sowas da man gerade von der WMF eine Einhaltung solcher Lizenzen erwarten kann.--Denniss (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Eher sollte man ihn wegen ignoring communety consensus and abusing staff rights sperren. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Jetzt kommt mal wieder 'runter. Übrigens ist dieses mw.user.isAnon() unnötig, da das Gadget sowieso nur aktiv ist, wenn der Benutzer das "purge"-Recht hat. Das ist z.Z. "the recommended way", ein Gadget nur für angemeldete Benutzer zu aktivieren. Siehe bugzilla:42171. Oder funktioniert dieser Rechte-Hack nicht mehr? Lupo 08:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


NigelHowells

Resolved

Atamari (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Oxyman (talk) 22:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done by Materialscientist --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Trassiorf

Pending

Mithril (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Trassiorf seems to be confused. Edits don't make sense. I asked on his talk page. Maybe it's a harmless hiccup. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:17, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Nickguarino

Resolved
✓ Indef. blocked Upload nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:10, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

5.104.108.125

Resolved
Thanks for the heads-up. I'll let you know if he does anything. Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


I hate Tory Ailes

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 22:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Driigt Hiift and Vvvgcfff

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 17:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


Buckeal Yung and Fatonio Rawlings

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:03, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Requested a global lock for those accounts, the one in the previous request and the one you mentioned at my talk page before they turn up on another project. Natuur12 (talk) 19:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 Question Could you please add the sockpuppet template? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Did so and I will try to find the other socks without the sockpuppet template. Natuur12 (talk) 20:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


John Franklin Square etc

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:04, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


Heelo Grrru

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 01:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. INeverCry 02:28, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Donotenterhere2014

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 20:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Pompommam

Resolved
✓ Done Blocked. INeverCry 22:23, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

USER/IP

Resolved

I have no idea who did this, as the part of the page that's vandalized doesn't show in the edit or history.

But please fix it back. (It's the aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa in the "other versions" part).

88.114.202.195 08:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism at Template:Other versions/Digestive system diagram. Thanks for reporting --Denniss (talk) 09:09, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Calvin Farwell

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, and upload deleted. INeverCry 20:19, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Robin Compdou

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 12:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Nuked and blocked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 14:43, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

DR of :File:Flag map of Greater Vietnam.png opened three times from three differen IPs

Resolved
  • Users:
  • Reasons for reporting: The user(s) under the above IPs (and possibly the same person using a Proxy) opened a DR for the file indicated above. He/she didn't provided any valid reason and refuses to follow the OTRS process to claim the authorship (if he/she really is the copyright holder). In the third nomination, the IP user threatens the uploader, that I considered all of them as a vandalical DR without any basis.

If the file is really inside the project scope, once closed the DR, I suggets to protect the file.

Amitie 10g (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Closed as speedy keep and semi-protected. The issue is that the map contains what are now parts of Cambodia and Laos, and not any copyright violation. INeverCry 03:30, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
Parts? It contains 100% of those 2 countries, a claim for which I found no support, trusting these articles. This image is a good example of what Commons should not be hosting — it is neither in use (not even in a user page, which could excuse contentlessness and bogusity) nor it includes sources or even a suggestion of usability in its description. I voted against an ill-formed DR, but would vote to delete this and many others in a properly worded DR. -- Tuválkin 07:57, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
I closed this because of the continued disruption from the IPs and the lack of a sufficient rationale for deletion. I'm not experienced with fictional maps/flags (if that's what this would be called), so if you or someone else wants to DR this & other images like it, I'll stand back and learn something new. INeverCry 02:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I tagged the map as fictional and disputed. I wonder what would happen here if someone makes a map where the US is part of Mexico or Canada. Or even better: France as a part of Great Britain. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:08, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
There are many such items under fictional flags and fictional maps — the amount and cleverness of protest against them should not be a reason to delete, however. I have nothing against those (indeed you could google that plus my name to know I played that game a lot in the past), but I think Commons’ scope does not include random gratuitous depictions self-created non-notable fictional items, there should at least be a descriptions of what it is and where it comes from. The costumary exemption for use page files, but again that is not a limitless escape clause. (And possibly this discussion should go somewhere else.) -- Tuválkin 07:02, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


ModAppi, Mysticseaport

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 03:23, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

✓ Nuked and blocked --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:44, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Tubin Cohu

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 17:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

✓ Blocked and nuked --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 17:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Nifl99, Mobimaks

Resolved
  • I've full-protected the file temporarily to end any edit-warring. It may be a better idea to upload the map showing Crimea as part of Russia as a seperate file, and let individual wikis decide which to use. If this is done, I would suggest protecting both files long-term to avoid the inevitable edit-warring. INeverCry 23:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
  • INeverCry, I really don't want to have to make another file for this as the current file has been used for a very long time and many people look back to it for historic purposes. As for Crimea, it has already been changed on most files on the page including the counter Daylight Saving Time file, so the choice of individual wikis has pretty much been determined. So if you could please first revert the last edit made by Mobimaks and then full protect the file that would be a lot better. Thank you! --Leftcry (talk) 00:33, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Ahonc

Herrimam

Resolved
  • User: Herrimam (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: As for this deletion request user confused Commons with Facebook. He uploaded lots of unsed and personal images, most of them deleted per project scope. For example this and this other deletion requests are this file, uploaded 2 days after the deletion, noticed onto his talk. I know this because at es:CGRR#Fuentes, the subject of the file "Yoa" has the same name and surname of this deleted file. Anyway, apart this habit to upload again deleted files, despite the notices, he uploaded some unlicensed files, created pages as Campismo el salto (now empty because all files were deleted) and Vida nueva (see first and second rollback), that are out of project scope and promotional about a group based in a town in western Cuba. This file was saved 1 year ago because it was used on eswiki, but in this promotioal edit by Herrimam above the article es:Shekhiná, now removed. Before it was added here (now removed), in the page es:Vida Nueva, that is unrelated (it is a Spanish literary magazine). The only 3 files used on Wikipedia are the ones in the article es:CGRR, edited only by Herrimam. this portraits are used as "sources" (???), this one could be the only one useful for the project scope but, trying to understand what is es:CGRR I've found on this Cuban government website that the CGRR (center for management for risk reduction) is not (as wroten in the lead of eswiki article) based only in Mantua, but in several Cuban cities and towns. I don't know es.wiki policies but is IMHO normal to have a general page about this subject instead of a page about a section of it. Just to remark that user contribs at eswiki look like the same to the ones here (including the speedy deletion of "Campismo el salto"). All this looks like a localist (to Mantua, Cuba) promotional attitude, completely out of project scopes (and in write-only, also using his UP). Anyway, several edits looking like nonsenses. Just to make an example: this file showing a man playing the drums is named "Iglesia Mantua" ("Church Mantua"), picture's subject changed completely 3 times, description says "imagen", picture is unused and (IMHO) unusable and, reading the "Comment" into file history... again "Yoandri" (file's subject of this and this other DR, as said above). Also this file changed subject (but was rollbacked by Palosirkka). For all the reasons shown I request an indef ban: user periodically continues to upload the same kind of files (or the same files) despite all the notices and DR. I suggest, who can, to report this case to the admins of eswiki, just to control the edits.
  • Note #1: Before my investigation I created the Category:Vida Nueva to add that pictures. I'm sorry... Of course, I'm going to request the speedy deletion of that category and files.
  • Note #2: I forgot to mention this DR about "files uploaded by Herrimam".
  • Note #3: I request a speedy deletion for all the files and pages, including this one, also used for his local promo and because, at this point, user contribs are IMHO all untrustable. Anyway, I found also the deleted Category:Grupo Vida Nueva. Anyway, I suspect a self-promotional intention: re-creation of the "Yoandri" files, addition of "Yoandri, Gomez" categories for example here or in this sort of self-vandalism (the one reverted by Motopark), usage of his portrait as source at es.wp is a bit strange
Concluding: I perceive a substantial incompatibility with the project scopes (including WP) that looks like vandalism in write-only. Sorry for my usual length explaining the reported cases and regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 04:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
I've not seen this vandalism still now. --Dэя-Бøяg 14:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Blocked for 5 days and added a informations template about the PS to users talkpage. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. I've seen you deleted this file... Also the other ones (01, 02, 03, 04, 05 and 06. see a previous mass DR), lesser useful for project scope, (and the category created by me before), need to be deleted. Btw, I've also removed that portraits used as sources on eswiki. Thanks again. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:41, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

My User page is vandalized

Resolved

My User page User:Vshustov has been vandalized on September 11 2014 by removing the following two entries: 1. Elderly_fitness_exercise.gif and 2. To-seismic-sustainability-through-earthquake-protector.gif which were immediately deleted by User:INeverCry without any discussion or crying (I mean her User name). However, it's never too late! Let's play by the rules, please... Vshustov (talk) 08:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

No vandalism here , therefore  . Please read COM:L--Steinsplitter (talk) 10:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

Lowdown (talk) 13:29, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

 Not here, User problems please. Revicomplaint? 13:48, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


Inaidfeew and Wapner Ethel

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 02:39, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged, and image & redirect deleted. INeverCry 03:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

93.44.110.225

Pending

刘海梁1986

✓ Done

9shi (talk) 04:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

I warned him/her. Next time (s)he should be blocked. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Alvavargas

ResolvedDeleted all uploads. User is warned, if they resume uploading copyvios, they should be blocked. Materialscientist (talk) 03:24, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
To resume: The only files not tagged for license problems/speedy del/DR (also by the same author) are their duplicates and so, all of them have a copyvio problem and IMHO need to be deleted. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:53, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Note (14 September): After warnings and deletions, today user resume to upload copyvios. File:Vidrieraf.jpg is a dupe of the deleted files Vidrieraigle.jpg and Vidrieraiglesia.png. And (to repeat) the DR for Vidrieraiglesia.png was opened by the same Alvavargas. I don't understand user's behavior: a day he uploads a file, another day he uploads a duplicate of it, after he requests file's deletion and, the day after deletion... he uploads it again. Is it a strange way to make fun of the project? Btw, copyvio after warnings and write-only. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked for two weeks.--Denniss (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

User:Zalo941

Resolved
Uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 01:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Thuy Ho

Pending
  • User: Thuy Ho (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: All recent uploads (mostly scanned portraits of bishops and religious artwork) are tagged as own work, but look to be the same sort of copyvios which were deleted last year. Some of the photos are of people who died long enough ago that it's unlikely the uploader could possibly be the photographer (judging by the self-portrait on his user page, anyway).

Psychonaut (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)


Hunter Marinov

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 16:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

JackTorrance311

Resolved

~Kevin Payravi (talk) 18:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Gone. --Denniss (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

108.194.238.251

Resolved

Jee 03:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. Geagea (talk) 03:24, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

HHubi

Resolved
FYI, he had some rename requests after denied by admin. (i.e.this) — revi^ 12:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
I support this block. People should not request renames over and over again if they disagree with a decline. That is frustrating the system. And DR's like this one are notdone imho. Natuur12 (talk) 15:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
  • HHubi was editing disruptively before his block and not communicating via talk pages. S/he should be encouraged to discuss his/her concerns (in German perhaps, since s/he may not be fluent in English).[26] His/her block may be terminated early if s/he agrees to stop disrupting Commons. Good block, but I would say it is for disruption, not vandalism. Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
He is also removing warnings he received months ago... I setting this as {{Resolved}} because no disagreement. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Inappropriate description on Wikimedia

Resolved

I would like to report an inappropriate description by an unknown user on the page commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Temple_of_Athena_Nike_in_Athens The French reads "This temple is shit, we don't give a shit about it".

Can this be removed? 80.111.227.253 10:07, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Typical vandalism. Reverted to earlier version. --Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

HHubi

Resolved

Steinsplitter (talk) 15:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


46.119.117.255

Resolved

Ajraddatz (talk) 02:40, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 02:43, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Special:Contributions/46.118.159.145 too; same spam. Ajraddatz (talk) 02:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done INeverCry 02:49, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Nuuhgtv

Resolved
✓ Done Yann (talk) 16:44, 29 September 2014 (UTC)


81.210.42.195

Resolved

79.130.38.212 06:39, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Blocked & edit summary hidden. Long-term troll wikinger. --Steinsplitter (talk) 06:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


Endcunda

Resolved
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


Tyler1193

Pending

77.96.249.228 20:04, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Rubbfiri, Yuboktying

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:58, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked, tagged, deleted. INeverCry 22:14, 2 October 2014 (UTC)


DABustersBar

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 01:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Wurpless

Resolved
  • User: Wurpless (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: While I was controlling a theater-related disambiguation category (not empty) I've found two files by the user. To resume: yet another self-promotional account using Commons to stock several pictures to use on Wikipedia. I discovered the article it:Wurpless (an Italian theatre group), tagged for speedy deletion as promo and created by the same Wurpless. Anyway, I've tagged for speedy deletion all the files uploaded here (01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07 and 08). Just to have a confirm, I've searched "Wurpless" on google.it and found quite nothing (a YouTube video, a FB profile). I request the indef ban as self-promo only (and crosswiki) account. Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: The article it:Wurpless has been deleted... Anyway, a reflection: suddenly it happens that somebody uses Wikipedia as a soapbox for self-promo articles, also not matching notability criteria. Same users fill Commons of pictures used only for that articles (until their deletion). Sometimes it happens that while they are discovered and blocked on Wikipedia, their promo uploads are not reported to Commons patrol and go unnoticed. So, sometimes, several files out of project scope remain here for a long time. A rapid block and file deltions could help to counteract this habit by promo-only accounts, IMHO. Thanks. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done Uploads nuked, user blocked indef. INeverCry 21:28, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks a lot for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:30, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Corazo

Pending

jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 22:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

I see only one problematic edit. Yann (talk) 10:07, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
All of his five edits are 100% trolling. -- Tuválkin 12:34, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Both edits to Category:S-Video were vandalism. Seems to have stopped now, I was just being cautious in case it didn't. --jnkyrdsprkl (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Антон патріот

Resolved
File deleted after restoring good version, user warned. --Denniss (talk) 23:44, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
Denniss, The user has just repeated his actions. --Leftcry (talk) 06:28, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done I've blocked the user indef, used GlobalReplace to revert his 75 changes, and deleted the re-uploaded file. INeverCry 07:03, 9 October 2014 (UTC)


Kayatw

Resolved

Wcam (talk) 15:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

TheRedPenOfDoom

Resolved

Kohelet (talk) 00:17, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Bad behaviour by both of you, use the talk page for content disputes. The claims the original source data is not based on 100% facts is valid. I have therefore moved the file to reflect this. --Denniss (talk) 09:18, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

TheRedPenOfDoom just repeated his actions, here. However, I did step in and revert this change promptly. DLindsley (talk) 17:44, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
✓ DoneProtected --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Purlziggy

Resolved

Mike VTalk 01:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done User VOA blocked, overwrites removed. INeverCry 01:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
@INeverCry: Please double check the file history. It's still visible. Mike VTalk 01:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Some kind of bug affecting the thumb display. I have no way of fixing it myself. I VOA blocked another sock and have full upload protected. INeverCry 02:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
@Mike V: @Tutelary: The thumb is back to normal for me. INeverCry 02:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Same for me. :) Thanks for your help in resolving the issue. Mike VTalk 05:59, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

This user keeps uploading a image with clear privacy and copyright violation, overwriting File:Jennifer Lawrence at the 83rd Academy Awards crop.jpg, and keeps deleting the speedy deletion requests of his image. Tm (talk) 01:29, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Case as already been taken care by INeverCry. Tm (talk) 01:32, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Irmagild8920

✓ Done

--64.85.215.152 12:36, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Image (version) deleted and user blocked for 1 week. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

University of Pennsylvania

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 00:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 01:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

141.91.240.163, return of Flow92?

Resolved
  • User: 141.91.240.163 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: This seems to be the return of Hamburg-based Flow92/Invitto/Hamburg73 who used a series of 141.91.240 ip addresses. Useless edits to Nissan pages such as this one and this one matches Flow92's obsession with miscategorizing and confusing various Nissan vehicles. See also earlier investigations. NB, I am totally willing to accept that this may be a coincidence and maybe this is some other user, but at least if Flow92 should return with his previous ferocity we already have a start.

mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked by INeverCry. Green Giant (talk) 13:08, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


Christiannese

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 12:57, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:05, 25 October 2014 (UTC)


GuffElofFriends

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 03:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 04:08, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Legenderfox

Resolved

DLindsley (talk) 01:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

P.S. I've nominated at least some of his uploads for speedy deletion as copyvios, if you want to review those. DLindsley (talk) 01:04, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Uploads nuked. Only 4 uploads and 1 talkpage edit, so not blockable yet. Next step should be an {{End of copyvios}} warning, and after that a short block if necessary. INeverCry 04:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks INeverCry for nuking his uploads. His behavior seems to have ceased. DLindsley (talk) 13:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

USER/IP

Resolved

Why someone removes pictures from wikicommons without contacting the person having uploaded it?! 'Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work' is no argument at all! I obtained the permission from the photographer and uploaded the file (because the photographer is no wiki-person and has other things to do, but you can contact him immediately, as soon as I got the signal that there is a problem). But simply removing is quite arrogant. CorneliusHasselblatt (talk) 17:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

I'm guessing this is about File:Veenker.jpg, which was deleted by Krd. When uploading, you stated that this was your own work and that you were the copyright holder, which is obviously not true. You also linked the author's name to your user page, which is misleading. Regardless of whether you obtained the author's permission to upload the file, those untrue and misleading details on the file description did make it a copyright violation. Such files are eligible for deletion without prior warning (though you should have been notified after the fact). Such deletions are in accordance with policy and do not constitute vandalism. To get the file undeleted, please follow our documented procedure. Do note that permission to upload the file to Commons is not sufficient; you need the author's permission to publish the photo under a license that allows anyone to use it in modified or unmodified form for any purpose, including commercial purposes. LX (talk, contribs) 18:09, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
Closing as resolved: No admin action needed. — revimsg 05:05, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Resolved

[27]- --Gripweed (talk) 21:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

I see that the file (version) has been deleted, so no real worries here. DLindsley (My talk page) 16:43, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done. One version deleted by -revi as a copyright violation. Green Giant (talk) 12:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Mtec

Resolved

HB (talk) 13:34, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done. One file revision deleted. The Tallinn revision was just a lower quality image. User has been warned. Green Giant (talk) 13:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

BrianMalting

Resolved

§FreeRangeFrogcroak 19:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Drmahmadi

Resolved

DLindsley (My talk page) 23:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 16:35, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Xm1702

Resolved

Codc (talk) 07:08, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Yann Has given him a final warning. INeverCry 16:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

FordK500

Resolved
  • User: FordK500 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: Promotion-only account. I nominated a file uploaded by him, which is File:FordEcoBoost300.png, for deletion as being taken from a promotional site, and being out of Commons' scope. He then proceeded to re-upload this file under a different name, which is File:FordEcoboost.png, after JuTa deleted it yesterday. I have nominated the re-uploaded file for deletion, and I hope an administrator sees the nomination page soon. You also might want to consider asking him what he is uploading this file for. Thanks.

DLindsley (My talk page) 22:12, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

The files are slightly different, one being EcoBoost 300, the other 400, but still another obvious copyvio. I've warned the uploader. As for the promo angle, this uploader may just be a fan of Ford. Ford-related logos would very likely be in scope with proper permission, which I doubt would be forthcoming. INeverCry 23:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Timothe8872

Resolved

Milad A380 talk? 21:14, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Taken care of at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_and_protections#Timothe8872. INeverCry 21:40, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Omateus11

Resolved

DLindsley (My talk page) 01:55, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

All images deleted, but leaving block to others.  revimsg 03:48, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Since WikiDiego91 is only on a 1-month block so far, it would probably be better to have a CU look at this new account before we pin it on Diego, and likely increase his block/warn him, etc. @Magog the Ogre: @Krd: @Jameslwoodward: INeverCry 05:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
One doesn't need checkuser privileges to see that sockpuppetry is unlikely. Aside from Commons, Omateus11 has only been active on Portuguese Wikipedia, while WikiDiego91 has primarily edited on Spanish Wikipedia. LX (talk, contribs) 16:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, I didn't think it passed the duck test either, as the sources and descriptions are also different. I would've blocked the account otherwise. A 2nd opinion is more what I was thinking of. I'm just used to talking to other CUs about possible socking. INeverCry 21:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I can definitely see what you are saying, LX. I have some theory that WikiDiego91 could have been hacking this account in question somehow. If that was the case, then an extension of WikiDiego91's block would be necessary if he hacked other people's accounts to re-upload this file. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:35, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Also, I've left Diego a note on his talk page. DLindsley (My talk page) 21:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
There is no reason at all to suspect hacking. Omateus11 continues to edit in Portuguese on Portuguese Wikipedia, a language never used by WikiDiego91. This is simply a case of two people who don't understand or don't care about copyright copying the same non-free image from English Wikipedia to Commons to use on their respective projects. It happens all the time. LX (talk, contribs) 22:06, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I have left a note on Omateus's talk page suggesting to him that he read Commons:Licensing. DLindsley (My talk page) 22:59, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I also just added to my note suggesting for him to read the project's scope as well. DLindsley (My talk page) 23:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

See edits of this user, please block--Motopark (talk) 18:07, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Self promotion only account. Indef.'ed main account and all socks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Cloxy

Resolved

Exonie (talk) 15:55, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Exonie, if a file is used, it is in scope. However, the license issue probably requires a change of license at source or a permission via OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
What if there's an edit war and I cannot remove the files from the wikipedia articles because he's putting them back? --Exonie (talk) 17:36, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, that's an issue you have to deal on Wikipedia, not here. Also if you report someone here, politeness requires that you inform him/her. I did it for you. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
I am capturing education videos on Bulgarian. My videos are with free license. I am talking on the whiteboard - there is no advertisements there. --Cloxy (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
There's a watermark and link to your website in the vids - that's advertisement. Besides, it's not the only issue as I have explained --Exonie (talk) 17:44, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
@Cloxy: Please do not upload files with watermarks. They could be removed by anyone, and it gives more works to us volunteers. As I said above, if your files wee published on YouTube before, could you either change the license at the source or send a permission following the procedure at COM:OTRS. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
OK, I will capture next videos without watermark. YouTube license is "Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". I think it's OK. --Cloxy (talk) 18:02, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
No clear case of vandalism. Scope & copyright issues should be discussed in a DR. Changing status therfore to resolved --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:12, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

42.60.224.22

Resolved
 Info this IP has been globalblocked 12 minutes after this is reported.
Anyway, blocking for a week. Resolved.  revimsg 13:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

180.92.129.217

Resolved

Buxtehude (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Done. Alan (talk) 22:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Orijentolog

Resolved

DLindsley (My talk page) 00:00, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

UPDATE: He just told me what to do, however he is not an administrator. Please have a discussion with him. DLindsley (My talk page) 00:38, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Mmkay. Won't do this in the future (this is a legitimate/serious promise). DLindsley (My talk page) 01:16, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
It may be worthwhile if you ask an administrator or other experienced editor before making a report here for confirmation you're doing the right thing. Many of your reports have been unhelpful and could potentially result in an editor being blocked by accident. Nick (talk) 01:50, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

No admin action required.  revimsg 12:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Rodrigo.Argenton

Resolved

Steinsplitter (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

I've reverted users talk page and left a note there. ~ Nahid Talk 15:16, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:01, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

2602:306:CC2E:EFB0:7009:BED1:CA6C:18E1

Resolved

We hope (talk) 20:14, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done, thanks for reporting! --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:18, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
And thank you for fixing things! We hope (talk) 20:19, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you also for the extra rights! We hope (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

محمد يوسف سليمان

Resolved

DLindsley Need something? 01:29, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Blocked, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 10:57, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Joshddz104

Resolved

DLindsley Need something? 20:48, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

User warned, next time block. --Steinsplitter (talk) 20:55, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Blocked because user is continuing. --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:19, 6 December 2014 (UTC)


Joshddz104

✓ Done Above

EoRdE6 (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Jmdiogo

Resolved
  • User: Jmdiogo (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: She just keeps on uploading copyright violations despite notices. She even ignored the final warning that Krd sent her as a result of the copyright violations. This and the fact, that she has uploaded nothing but copyright violations, including ones with no licenses, makes me feel that she should be blocked for a time.

DLindsley Need something? 18:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

152.26.51.96

Resolved

EoRdE6 (talk) 19:29, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:42, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

2.62.44.243

Resolved

Doalex (talk) 12:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Blocked. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


Vicky4515

Pending

DLindsley Need something? 19:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

FritsHG

Resolved

Jee 15:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Given the user a final warning, next time block. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Krishanseo5

Resolved

NativeForeigner 토론 (talk) 07:04, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

global locked, images deleted. Giving an indef-block for autoblock. — Revi 17:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Chamelle67

Resolved

Jules78120 (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done by Green Giant. Alan (talk) 02:11, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

LykaSanson

Resolved
✓ Done Blocked, files deleted. Yann (talk) 10:32, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

180.253.122.150

Resolved

Sjö (talk) 13:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, file deleted. Yann (talk) 14:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Ebbx

Resolved

Alan Liefting (talk) 05:00, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 05:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)


94.213.150.247

Resolved
Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

AlexanderCamacho14, Rodrigo Cardenas 720...

Hi, I blocked AlexanderCamacho14 (talk · contribs), Rodrigo Cardenas 720 (talk · contribs), and 187.161.65.44 (talk · contribs) for repeated vandalism on File:Jonathan Alexander Manzanares Camacho..jpg. I also semi-protected this page for a month. A CU is certainly in order. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Aside from passing the duck test, the initial blocks of these 2 accounts generated only one autoblock. I've switched to indef blocks for these VOA socks. INeverCry 20:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

2620:0:1000:437C:F966:A6C:E775:7243

Resolved

DLindsley Need something? 20:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Holiday until the new year. ;oD Yann (talk) 20:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

OliverLyden

Resolved

DLindsley Need something? 03:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 04:03, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

70.190.229.97

Resolved

DLindsley Need something? 16:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

IP blocked by Yann, so I'll be marking this as "Resolved". DLindsley Need something? 16:27, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Blocked, closed all DRs. Yann (talk) 16:30, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Lijingliang88926

Resolved

Lanwi1(Talk) 09:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

User warned, all nominated for deletion. Yann (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
I'm not an admin, but Yann appears to have missed three of the user's uploads. I nominated those three uploads for deletion. DLindsley Need something? 16:51, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done All uploads nuked and user blocked. User is also blocked on zhwiki for the same reason. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Silar

Deleting categories: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
See in plWiki: pl:Wikipedysta:Silar = pl:Wikipedysta:46.174.26.245. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:50, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. This was not his first block. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Victorcolon

Resolved
✓ Done by Denniss. Yann (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Asiflfc

Resolved

DLindsley Need something? 13:08, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Actually the original DR was probably not appropriate. Both deleted. Yann (talk) 13:45, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 Comment But maybe the photo should be deleted anyway as out of scope and uploader's request? This is his/her only upload, maybe (s)he does not know, how to behave? Taivo (talk) 14:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

Йайценюк Арсеній Петрович

Resolved

Permjak (talk) 20:54, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

I am not an admin, but the user has been blocked indefinitely by Russavia. Therefore, ✓ Done. DLindsley Need something? 21:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

INeverCry

I cant find same image in google, so looks like flickr user posted his own work. I dont have idea, why User:INeverCry deleted image, he didnt bother to explain his position and solution. Please restore image in subject if its posible. Thank You. Cap1000 (talk) 11:03, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

The subject of that photo seems to be a proprietary user interface with non-free, copyrighted icons which the Flickr user does not have the right to license. As there are thousands of copyright violations uploaded every day that have to be deleted by a handful of administrators, there isn't enough time to explain the rules individually to everyone who doesn't bother to read the existing explanations such as those at Commons:Licensing, Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Screenshots. Is there a particularly good reason why you would assume bad faith and jump to the conclusion that an experienced administrator is engaged in vandalism? LX (talk, contribs) 11:19, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
The photo is derivative work of copyrighted content. INeverCry acted correctly, deleting the photo. Taivo (talk) 14:58, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
You really want us to take action against an administrator over a deletion? Really?? The subject has been asked to take action here. DLindsley Need something? 15:21, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
The problem is not about reporting on an admin. The problem is misusing this page with bogus claims of vandalism. Should an admin actually incurr in vandalism, this is the proper venue, and surely actions are expected to be taken against it. -- Tuválkin 13:54, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 Comment This image was tagged for speedy deletion by a license reviewer, and I deleted it as a copyvio per COM:DW. No vandalism occurred. @Cap1000: In future you should ask the deleting admin on his/her talkpage about any deletions you think may have been mistaken. INeverCry 17:27, 8 January 2015 (UTC)


John Malfoy

Resolved

The Haz talk 02:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

I was putting better images. John Malfoy (talk) 02:49, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

The user seems to be dealing with namely:

The Haz talk 03:40, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

@Hazmat2: blocked indefinitely by Materialscientist now! Holger1959 (talk) 06:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

if someone is interested: this list shows the vandalism effect (all images between 02:36 AM and 05:57 AM!) Holger1959 (talk) 07:23, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Fantastic! The Haz talk 17:35, 10 January 2015 (UTC)


File:Ripon Cathedral Rood Screen, Nth Yorkshire, UK - Diliff.jpg

Unprotect for replace in 2-nd row en to es in description this fie or correct by administrator.-- Володимир Ф (talk) 08:55, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Fixed --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:57, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks!-- Володимир Ф (talk) 09:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Vania11031

Pending

DLindsley Need something? 20:36, 11 January 2015 (UTC)


VorteXLP

Pending

Suspect video

Re: File:Laminoplasty-and-Laminectomy-Hybrid-Decompression-for-the-Treatment-of-Cervical-Spondylotic-pone.0095482.s001.ogv (found with [30]).

The video on this page was blocked the Java security in my computer.

I was searching for "cervical" laminectomy, referring to cervical vertebrae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cramosm (talk • contribs)

No problem for me. Yann (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Some web browsers (e.g. Safari, WebKit) require Java to play ogv/webm videos. It sounds like your Java installation has been misconfigured to block the Wikimedia video plugin. -FASTILY 02:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Suspect video

Re: File:Laminoplasty-and-Laminectomy-Hybrid-Decompression-for-the-Treatment-of-Cervical-Spondylotic-pone.0095482.s001.ogv (found with [31]).

The video on this page was blocked the Java security in my computer.

I was searching for "cervical" laminectomy, referring to cervical vertebrae. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cramosm (talk • contribs)

No problem for me. Yann (talk) 14:25, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
Some web browsers (e.g. Safari, WebKit) require Java to play ogv/webm videos. It sounds like your Java installation has been misconfigured to block the Wikimedia video plugin. -FASTILY 02:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Draco Smith

Resolved
✓ Done Blocked & tagged, all overwrites history cleaned, target images protected. INeverCry 02:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Mondolkiri1

Pending

I haven't broken the 3RR rule in any of those cases. Concerning to the changes in the Map of the Eurasian Union.svg, and I ignore any rule preventing adding different maps in other Wikipedias. I used this source: http://www.worldbulletin.net/economy/152032/eurasian-economic-union-begins-today . I thought it would be more informative, but I won't change the maps further, since I don't consider those changes as such an important issue, given that Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan are only potential members (as Tajikistan is, and this country is already shaded in a different colour, so I used the same logic as it had been used for Tajikistan). I think that if Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan are not shaded in a different (lighter colour), neither should be Tajikistan, in any map, but this particular issue is open to discussion. I don't disagree with this approach concerning to the map, where only current and acceeding members are coloured. Nevertheless, as I said, according to the informations I've consulted, then I guess it makes no sense to display Tajikistan in a different colour either (either in these ones or in other files). Concerning to ESC 2015 Map.svg, I used the same logic as, e.g., Cyprus, where Northern Cyprus is not displayed in a different colour (since both are non-UN members and both have limited recognition). As I learned later, Kosovo has already participated in some Eurovision events, so I think the map is correct now (therefore, I didn't do any further changes on that map, obviously. I admit that I commited the mistake of making the changes without discussing them in the talk pages, but most changes in the maps are done without any discussion, anyway. If I'm allowed, in further map changes, I'll present the sources supporting the changes not only in the articles but also in the explanation of the change. Mondolkiri1 (talk) 22:19, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Concerning to the Nordic Council countries, I only reverted once in the case of Denmark. I haven't reverted anything else, apart from a couple of self-reverts in the case of Sweden. And I didn't edit those maps since then.Mondolkiri1 (talk) 22:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Gripweed

Resolved

DLindsley Need something? 22:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Dbigcargon

Resolved
✓ Done INeverCry 04:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

BarrettProductions

Resolved
✓ Done Uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 23:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for attention :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 23:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)


ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2

Resolved

EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 07:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Blocked for three days (user is indef blocked on arwiki, but i can't read the reason because i don't speak ar. Googe translator don't help.) See also User talk:ديفيد_عادل_وهبة_خليل_2#Stop_redirecting_galleries_to_categories. @EoRdE6: can you please help with cleaning up? --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
Google translates the block reason (كان حساب مؤقت) to "Was a temporary account", presumably of ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل. LX (talk, contribs) 10:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Nikhit96

Resolved

Bazj (talk) 12:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 21:09, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Weaver Lightning

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 16:17, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

kwameghana

Resolved

Thank you Kwameghana (talk) 18:30, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

If you couldn't find Commons:Administrators and couldn't find a better place to ask for directions than the Vandalism noticeboard, you're probably not ready to become an administrator. Far too few contributions and recently deleted uploads are further nails in the coffin. Sorry, LX (talk, contribs) 19:21, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

42.66.239.134

Resolved

4028mdk09 (talk) 12:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked. Yann (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

194.199.37.18

Resolvedblocked for one month. Materialscientist (talk) 00:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Vandal /St1995 22:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

IP :87.17.14.144

Resolved
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Continuation by IP 87.17.14.144. Thank you.--Kacir (talk) 11:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked User:Crasha for two weeks because of this and the ongoing copyvio issues. Clearly identified itself at Kacir's talk page. --Denniss (talk) 13:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

5.56.186.194

Resolved

Leyo 16:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done and i deleted the DR. Looks like a LTA (sock/metapuppetry). --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:44, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Messina from de wiki, he's whining over there that his "properly sourced" files where deleted but those "inappropriately licensed" from Xocolatl were not. Seems to live in his own small world.--Denniss (talk) 17:37, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Tetra_quark

Resolved

Sigwald (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Blocked indef, uploads reverted by me and other admins. Looks like revanche foul for block at en wiki. --Denniss (talk) 17:49, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Thesmokedetector

Resolved

Acroterion (talk) 17:37, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Эlcobbola talk 17:46, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, can you delete the image so that the next sockpuppet will at least have to re-upload it? Acroterion (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

72.15.24.129

Resolved

Thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a week. Taivo (talk) 18:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

197.83.246.10

Resolved

Only vandalism /St1995 19:11, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2015 (UTC)


StefanStern94‎

Resolved
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:06, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Mrbean4200

Resolved
✓ Done Vandalism-only account. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanx. And btw, the user was also blocked at enwiki :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 15:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

TScreen group

Resolved

KAV777 (talk) 15:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

I protected the file for a week and closed all his deletion requests speedily. I did not block him/her yet, but I will, if (s)he continues. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done TScreen group continued uploading copyvios and got blocked for a week, then started socking and using bad language and got blocked forever. Taivo (talk) 18:35, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

72.15.24.129

Resolved

Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

I have just warned him with {{Test2}}. Please report again if he continues vandalising. Thanks. Jianhui67 talkcontribs 15:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
✓ Blocked and hidden to revisions because of grossly insulting. Ip was blocked previously. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

204.28.99.2

Resolved

Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done by Marcus Cyron --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:31, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

This guy seems really not to like us ;). Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Caidin2015

Resolved

Keφr (keep talk here) 11:44, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done VOA blocked, edits reverted, and trash uploads deleted. INeverCry 20:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
What is COM:VOA? Never mind. Keφr (keep talk here) 20:43, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
For the sake of any other readers, 'vandalism only account'. Revent (talk) 13:30, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

微醺2002

Resolved

Lanwi1(Talk) 09:03, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Uploads nuked, user blocked. INeverCry 09:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Dick657Tap

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 21:19, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Blocked along with sleeper User:Davekipps34. INeverCry 22:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Improper use of a private photograph

Pending

I wish to complain that a photograph has been used File:Newmore_Castle_2008.JPG ‎(480 × 360 pixels, file size: 72 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg) This was taken without my permission and from my private garden and is now available for all to use as copyright has been removed. This is a contravention of my rights as owner. How do I obtain its removal as the building is in an unsafe condition and is in a private garden and public access must be avoided. My husband and I have owned this property for very many years. I have issues with the person who thought it was ok to publish as this is clearly not the case without my permission - perhaps you would be kind enough to forward this to him and he would contact me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎81.149.156.56 (talk • contribs)

@QuintusPetillius: Anything to say? Regards, Yann (talk) 12:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
The image is in use on WP:EN illustrating the article on the building. I'm not sure you have grounds to demand the removal of the image. No copyright issues are involved and I don't think that Scottish law gives you, as owner of an ancient building, the right to control images of the building. The law might give you the right in Germany, but not in most common law countries. You may have a case for trespass against the photographer, but that does not affect the use of the image here.
In any event, if it turns out that Scottish law would demand the removal of this image on the owner's request, it is well established WMF policy that the demand cannot be made by an anonymous IP user. It must be made by someone who actually identifies herself (in private) to an OTRS volunteer and establishes her connection with the building to the satisfaction of the volunteer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Sisagester/125.41.136.57

Resolved
  • User: Sisagester (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log and 125.41.136.57 (talk · contribs)
  • Reasons for reporting: He constantly change the information of files I uploaded. I know that common files are free and modifiable. But he puts wrong websites on the "source" in Summary section over and over again, even I undo it so many times. Firstly, the site he wrote is under copyright protection. Secondly, it's not where the picture comes from. He keep on changing the source site, ignoring my "undo" actions. What he trying to do is to prompt his website. I think it's very bad and destructive to wikipedia. And I don't know how many times should I undo the modifications until he stops. Files he changes: Lb-asphalt-plant-structure.jpg, Asphalt plant for construction.jpg etc....

Wikisay (talk) 07:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

OMG, he is doing it again, and I found that he also changes other users' files in the same way. [File:Asfaltinstallatie met paralleltrommel.jpg],[File:Asphaltmischanlage Gesamtansicht.jpg]. Ivyzhang214 is his sockpuppet, also IP: 125.41.79.101. Can you help blocking him?

Wikisay (talk) 02:43, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Now, I found that he changed the licensing information: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Lb-asphalt-plant-structure.jpg&action=history you can see it in the history. Section (int:license-header) I've changed it back "for now". And now I'm sure I can call him vandalism. Wikisay (talk) 03:27, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Warned and all uploads nominated for deletion. I seriously thought about blocking both (Sisagester and Wikisay) for edit warring, so be warned. --Didym ([[User talk:|talk]]) 06:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@Didym: Thanks, man. I'm sorry, I admit that I fight him back and that's not proper. But I was too angry. And he continues doing it, I don't know what else to do. I sincerely accept the warning, like I accpet all good modifies and advises. But now I need to change them to the way before valdal, which is not intending to keep the edit war. Best Regards.----Wikisay (talk) 06:59, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Varsity_Walnut

ResolvedIndeffed, thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


Hsbdfnrndnd

Resolved

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:39, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 02:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Bugdom_Dragonfly

Resolved

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:47, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 02:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)


Sehfhfnfhhrjf

Resolved

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:55, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 03:02, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

Michael_Rosoft

Resolved

Ian.thomson (talk) 02:38, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done INeverCry 03:10, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Sisagester

Resolved

By the way, he also upload pictures with the same source and advertise it on the wikipedia, all the edits is done under his IP addresses. I don't think this user will stop hacking others' file until he is blocked. Best Regards.---- Wikisay (talk) 06:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Now indef blocked for uploading copyvios and vandalizing file description pages after warnings and a previous block. --Didym (talk) 10:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Returnnew and sockpuppets

Resolved
Note: searching for user's career, I discovered this CU request on itwiki (look, Unsulupilus is confirmed), and this page. Final note: the user "Mechagoji75", added some minutes ago by JohnBlackburne at the SPI page, is not registered here. --Dэя-Бøяg 20:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Returnnew, Unsulupilus, and Acus010 are Confirmed as connected to each other. I've blocked them. I've also blocked Charliewolf79 per the cross-wiki blocks, etc, just to be safe. I don't see any other socks/sleepers. INeverCry 22:05, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Note: I've posted this on CU-L so stewards can consider if global locking is needed. INeverCry 22:11, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Note 2: I can sufficiently understant Italian, as Spanish, to see that this text I've removed is pure trolling against JohnBlackburne, along with threats to do something as get angry (!) and contact personally Wikipedia (?) if someone dare to defend him. There are also included other threats to the same user in broken English. In the same text he admits that his cousin Charliewolf is him. Here (as Unsulupilus) he talks about an edit war for strange reasons (lying) at en:Concord Production Inc. about a video file (this one). I discovered that the page is continuously vandalized by anons and sp of the user (still now, at this moment), and was still protected. It's unbelievable that a user ignoring any policy about copyright, any netiquette, trolling, sending legal (and illegal) threats, mockin' and lying to several serious users that tried to follow and help him, using lesser controlled Wikimedia pages to do whatever he wants; continued to vandalize and lie with this impudence, using systematically cyberbullying. Btw, I repat, it could be considerable to think to a global ban. And about the threats to JohnBlackburne, I'll report 'em to it. Due to its nationality (Italian), threats and repeated cyberbullying, i know that it could be the possibility to notice this to a unit named Polizia Postale e delle Comunicazioni (Postal and Communications Police). Thanks a lot for your interventions and for the report to the stewards. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:03, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
Just to add a final note, about this itwp page I linked above, admins added other links to the same kind of threats, repeated also there. Something as how dare you idiots, I put upside-down Wikipedia and similar. Each comment is superfluous, thanks for the rapidity of global ban. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:14, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Caarl 95

Pending

82.50.39.138 20:53, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

MichaelMaggs

Resolved

MichaelMaggs (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log

Vandalism and admin abuse on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:State Emergency Service of Ukraine (MChS) Mil Mi-8MTV picking up water near Nezhin.jpg. Caveat: You cannot actually execute it, it has to be handled on m:Steward requests/Permissions based on a community consensus. –Be..anyone (talk) 01:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Maybe INeverCry and Dschwen also want to comment on this. I personally consider the whole action to be blatant nonsense. --Didym (talk) 01:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
This is the vandalism AN, and this case doesn't look like vandalism. For user problems, there is COM:AN/U, and for requests for de-adminship COM:DEADMIN.    FDMS  4    02:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
And see community opinion here. That page can be simply deleted. Jee 01:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
I closed this as per above comments. Yann (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

79.2.2.146

✓ Done IP and new sock User:Geronimoaug blocked. INeverCry 02:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot :-) . --Dэя-Бøяg 02:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Block evasion: Is it possible to delete this talk and revoke its access to the user? Yet another trolling and delirium: for the user a global ban is a spite between buddies who get angry, or something similar. And again the same script: lies, dramatic excuses (as every time after a ban) with oaths to repair, the wish to start again with the same damages we have seen and partly repaired, and so on. Sincerely, this way to mock the entire foundation project, still now, is unacceptable. Along with the usage of Commons as a "sorting shed" for that files. As said, the IP is static, along with 82.55.165.94. A very long block for both the IPs, or better a global ban, is IMHO the only solution. Thanks for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 15:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:00, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. --Dэя-Бøяg 23:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
ResolvedNo admin action needed

Hi, vandalism on this caregory page (see [35]) by an IP -- Christian Ferrer 06:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for reporting. That was reverted by Jkadavoor. Apparently there is no other measure to be taken as reverting solves the problem for now. Cheers.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 23:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

125.41.29.166

Resolvedblocked, reverted. Materialscientist (talk) 09:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
  • User: 125.41.29.166 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: This is IP of user Sisagester, I reported many of his IPs in wikipedia today because of Disruptive Editing, now his IPs are blocked in wikipedia. However, he continues vandalizing my file description pages in wikimedia again, just as why his account is blocked now. Can you help blocking his IPs, this is really endless....

Wikisay (talk) 09:37, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  •  Comment: Your file description pages? Unless your mean your user page or others under it, you should read COM:OWN again. Also, please note that this is Wikimedia Commons, a Wikimedia project, not just “wikimedia”, and that what you’re refering to as just “wikipedia” is the English Wikipedia (one of many), also a Wikimedia project. (As for the reported vandalism, it is spam and should be reverted and blocked, of course — no qualms there.) -- Tuválkin 12:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
    •  Comment: Meh. Perfectly reasonable to say "my file description pages" rather than "the file description pages of files I have uploaded." - Jmabel ! talk 16:16, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
      •  Comment: Thanks for making it clear for me. I'm always comfused about the relationship between wikimedia commons and wikipedia. However I know that files in commons are public and free to modify in good purpose, and I did use imprecise expression without noticing it:). Anyway, thanks for all the helps.

Posts of inappropriate personal information

Resolved

kahusi (會話) 13:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Blocked, uploads deleted, logs hidden & edit summary rev deleted. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks. This text also request: "File:(hide).JPG" from Commons:Deletion requests/Breach of privacy20150325. --kahusi (會話) 16:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Done. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. --kahusi (會話) 16:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Another IP of user Sisagester

‎123.6.199.250
Resolved

Wikisay (talk) 08:52, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Could you please change the source link as I did in File:DHB-asphalt-drum-mix-plant.jpg, add categories, and ask for license review with a {{LicenseReview}} template? Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

OK, I have listed the direct links for each file, and left the {{LicenseReview}} template. I'm not very familiar with this. Please help me check it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisay (talk • contribs)

125.41.142.0

Resolved

Wikisay (talk) 00:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Reverted and blocked for 1 week. --Didym (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

IP of Sisagester

Resolved

Wikisay (talk) 00:53, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Blocked and reverted. @Wikisay: can you list the usually vandalized files, so we can protect them? --Didym (talk) 00:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
@Didym: Ok, these files are:File:Lb-asphalt-plant-structure.jpg,File:DHB-asphalt-drum-mix-plant.jpg,File:LB asphalt plant.JPG,File:Asphalt plant pic.jpg,File:Asphalt plant for construction.jpg.thank you very much, however these files had been protected before. Once the time is over, he will begin vandalizing them. I don't know if there is a permanent to avoid this. Anyway, thanks again.Wikisay (talk) 01:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
All protected for 3 months. --Didym (talk) 01:32, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
THANK YOU!Wikisay (talk) 02:09, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
What about blacklisting the spamvertized website? Or do they offer anything of use for Commons ? --Denniss (talk) 02:40, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
I've added it to the spam blacklist. The site has an ARR copyright statement at bottom that directly mentions all photos. INeverCry 03:12, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Forecar ford

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Ihggvg

Resolved

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Atvhayward

Resolved

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Marfryd6360

Resolved

Keφr (keep talk here) 18:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

 Comment Looks like a lost newbie. Some explanation in her/his language might help. Reverted and deleted. Yann (talk) 19:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Kagamine Rin 02

Resolved

CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Undef. for spamming. Yann (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

202.176.202.135

Resolved

Odysseus1479 (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done I already blocked 202.176.202.128/28 for a couple weeks after cleaning up the vandalism. INeverCry 08:12, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

God.ta35

Resolved

Slick (talk) 06:05, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Now I have blocked a god! Let us be atheists for 1 week. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Jones771

✓ Done Materialscientist (talk) 00:45, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

NawlinWiki (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Patricspike

Resolved

Stepro (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

149.172.245.24

Resolved

тнояsтеn 08:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

an User:Thgoiter . Die Bilder sind über 100 Jahre alt. /The pictures are 100 years old, like many other pictures (with unknown authors) on commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.172.245.24 (talk • contribs) 08:45, 16. Apr. 2015‎ (UTC)
Die Löschanträge entscheidet ein Admin, nicht du. (DR are decided by an admin, not by you). --тнояsтеn 08:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
siehe File:Burgplatz Essen, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal.jpg Ich habe Ihnen nicht das Du angeboten — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.172.245.24 (talk • contribs) 08:49, 16. Apr. 2015‎ (UTC)
Bitte Beiträge signieren. de:WP:Du. --тнояsтеn 08:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:58, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Also see my comment here: [36]. --тнояsтеn 08:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

& reverted :-) --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:02, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

EMwiki9

Pending

WikiDan61 (talk) 17:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked, file deleted. Yann (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Fake meteorites

Pending

Geogene (talk) 01:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

 Comment And also socking as Lostcitymeteor (talk · contribs). Yann (talk) 08:08, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
I nominated some of her uploads for deletion and closed two DR-s. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Charliewolf's new SP

Resolved
I sent a request for global lock. --Dэя-Бøяg 02:02, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done - Users have been globally blocked on meta by Billinghurst. So the report could be considered resolved. --Dэя-Бøяg 03:41, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Mike B. Rosoft

Resolved

discospinster (talk) 17:48, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

    • Sadly this idiot will not stop vandalizing Commons and other projects. And as usual he's impersonating an existing user. Don't know if we can block similar named new users via filter. --Denniss (talk) 09:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Mat334

Resolved

mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:21, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Could it be this guy? They seem to be having some kind of tiff over in :ja. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 01:24, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Blocked, upload deleted. --Didym (talk) 01:53, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Yadirac9001

Resolved
Just to make an example of what is the kind of text in the descriptions, I report a phrase: We work every day in getting better the quality of our product. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Advertising-only account --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Somedayzzz

Resolved

Bidgee (talk) 09:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked undef. Yann (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Now back using Report2thamist (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log. Bidgee (talk) 09:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Idef blocked by Túrelio (talk · contribs). Bidgee (talk) 09:53, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

103.17.164.185

Pending

Bidgee (talk) 04:39, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

197.76.130.111

Pending

Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:16, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a day. Longer block will be done if vandalism continues. Yann (talk) 19:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


36.253.210.51

Resolved

Bidgee (talk) 01:48, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Blocked for a day. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Trung Brown

Resolved

OkuRaku (talk) 04:09, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, fans of Memorial Day buried under gravestones. Trung Brown (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Trung Brown hereby warned (and also on his talk page) that if he does this one more time he'll be blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 05:01, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
  • I have reverted this and will revert the rest of his vandalism. At this point, I am assuming that all of his uploads over anyone else's image are vandalism. - Jmabel ! talk 05:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

.

Sorry Jmabel, I already blocked this user, it's a reincarnation of our valued ceiling fan vandal. Uploads nuked as well. :-) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:10, 17 May 2015 (UTC)


AdamSchlaung

Resolved
  • User: AdamSchlaung (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
  • Reasons for reporting: Based on his actions at the English Wikipedia, and based on his file uploads here, I think the user is just here to vandalize/disrupt the project. None of the uploads are ever going to be used and all have been nominated for deletion. In fact, he's nominating some of his own files now for deletion further adding to the disruption.

Only (talk) 09:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

KeithBlackD (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log probably needs to go with him. Only (talk) 09:46, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet and master blocked, uploads nuked. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:35, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


Alexander Goldman

Resolved

Apparition11 (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Blocked & file protected. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)


Scott Rowland

Resolved

Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:21, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Blocked and tagged. I've cleaned the file's history and semi-protected it for a while. I also deleted the DR and rolled back the IP edits, as we don't need to give this sockmaster any extra attention. INeverCry 03:45, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Lead Gray

Resolved

   FDMS  4    16:49, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Thibaut120094 (talk) 16:57, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
@Thibaut120094: Please also hide the vandal's revisions.    FDMS  4    17:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
@FDMS4: Done. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Ferling_PR

Resolved

GY Fan 10:18, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

 Not done The images are monothematic and it is likely that we receive an OTRS permission for them, as it was previously. I do not see a reason to block here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankry (talk • contribs) 06:23, May 30, 2015‎ (UTC)

2.86.132.44

Resolved
Not vandalism, just edit warring.
Luxure, you do not 'own' the description, even if you uploaded the file, and you both need to discuss it on the talk page instead of you arbitrarily blanking the IP editors comments there. You should not be trying to have a discussion in edit summaries, especially one where you threaten another editor with blocking. You are both 'wrong' in your behavior, regardless of whose description is correct (and tbh, it should probably be described as the former flag, with the relevant dates, regardless of what else is mentioned). "Vandalism" is when a person is intentionally damaging things, not when they disagree about something but are acting in good faith.
Your claim to the copyright is probably bogus anyhow, since the exact same image was uploaded as a PNG in 2010 (merely changing an image from one format to another is not a creative act and does not create a copyright claim). Revent (talk) 05:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Revent, visit the "Macedonians (ethnic group)" page on wikipedia. The flag is referenced as the ethnic flag for these people, so the description is correct. Luxure Σ 05:42, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Luxure: Ah, fair enough, I was mixing up that design with this one based on a textual description. Still, the IP's edit aren't really 'vandalism', even if misguided, just a content dispute, and people should be warned on their personal talk pages, not in edit summaries. The drama should be hashed out on the image talk page, not in an edit war, and you were wrong when you blanked the IPs attempt to do so. What is the correct description should be decided by discussion and consensus (you do not own the file page, even if you own the copyright to the image), and if someone is attempting to act in good faith but still causing problems they should be taken to COM:AN/U, not here.... this board is for 'obvious' vandalism (like if they were changing it to 'flag of the penises' or something). Revent (talk) 05:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
It's just adding NPOV info, that's really not needed for an image, better suits an article. I will however undo my edit on the talk page. Luxure Σ 05:59, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Indeed, but it's not vandalism, it's just a content dispute/edit war. Don't war, talk it out, and ask for other opinions if needed to get consensus...then, if the IP keeps fighting about it, go to ANU. Revent (talk) 06:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
I protected the file File:Ethnic_Macedonian_Flag.svg for a week in hope to avoid an edit war. Macedonia is a hot topic right now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
Thanks my favourite owl! Luxure Σ 11:50, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Owl? Right.... --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:27, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
@Hedwig in Washington: Harry Potter's owl is named Hedwig. INeverCry 23:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
That one. Gotcha. Thanks for waking me up! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 23:10, 2 June 2015 (UTC)