YanikB

File by user

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour, Tu n'as pas mis de bandeau de licence, il est nécessaire pour spécifier le statut de l’"œuvre" dérivée.

Soit tu considères que tes modifications sont triviales et tu peux alors utiliser la même licence que l’œuvre originale, et il te faudra alors rajouter {{PD-Art|PD-old-100-1923}} dans la zone appropriée.

Soit tu considères que tes modifications ne sont pas triviales et tu devrais utiliser une licence compatible (au choix, WTFPL, CC0 ou bien CC-BY-SA (...)) avec l'hébergement sur Commons.

Esby (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Au niveau de la procédure de suppression, cela devrait être bon.

je te conseille de catégoriser ces fichiers dans une catégorie utilisateur, et de ne pas les catégoriser au niveau des catégories topologiques (cad ne pas les mettre au même niveau que l’œuvre originale, histoire de ne pas induire les ré-utilisateurs en erreur).

Au niveau de la catégorie utilisateur tu peux utiliser un Category:Files by User:YanikB ou bien Category:User:YanikB, selon ton choix, que tu pourras remplir avec le code suivant:

{{user category|YanikB}}

Même remarque concernant l'usage de tels fichiers: tant que c'est au niveau des pages de discussions et de tes pages propres (ici par exemple), l'usage est ok, mais par contre, ne pas utiliser sur l'espace principal d'une quelconque wikipédia, cela pourrait être perçu comme du vandalisme.

Si tu as des questions quelconques, tu n'hésites pas.

Esby (talk) 15:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

J'ai corrigé votre catégorisation, le user category doit être sur une catégorie, pas sur les médias. Si vous préferez un autre nom pour votre catégorie, vous pouvez le changer, j'effacerai au besoin l'ancienne.

Esby (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Hasan-Abad-Téhéran.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Hasan-Abad-Téhéran.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Ichelladhen.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Ichelladhen.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Diouloulou CR.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Diouloulou CR.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:51, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ilytch.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ilytch.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Ilytch.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:58, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Egray-Germond-Rouvre.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Egray-Germond-Rouvre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

—LX (talk, contribs) 11:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Temis CH.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

File:Temis CH.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

—LX (talk, contribs) 12:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

The Owner of this file "Sophie Cléroux" asked me to upload it. Since she is mentionned I don't see any copyright problem. Tell me what to do to restore. thx --YanikB (talk) 15:44, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please respect my request to keep discussions where they started, as this makes conversations easier to follow. I am watching this page, so I will see responses made here.

The photo appears at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10202435777668944 without any mention of the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license. If you do have the copyright holder's permission to publish the photo under that license or any other license allowing anyone to use, modify and redistribute the photo for any purpose, including commercial purposes, please follow these instructions. —LX (talk, contribs) 15:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ok, if she removes the file from her Facebook will it be OK?

I see that Paranomio sources are not valid too. Too bad. --YanikB (talk) 16:28, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

No, that's not what I said. Since it's a photo from a third-party source with no evidence that the copyright holder has agreed to publication under a free license, you'll need to provide such evidence.

The same thing applies to files from Panoramio. For example, File:Dyas Home in Hinsdale, IL - panoramio.jpg is fine, because it's clearly marked "

Attribution-Share Alike by ingawh" with a link to the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 license at its source page. The files you uploaded were marked "© All Rights Reserved" at their original sources. —LX (talk, contribs) 17:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK got it. Is there a way to do the same as Panoramio in FaceBook? — Preceding unsigned comment added by YanikB (talk • contribs) 18:55, 22 March 2015‎ (UTC)Reply

There is no license selection like that on Facebook, but the copyright holder could still mention the license in the description. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

God kväll Alex, det är bra med dig?

What happend if it is me that modified the photo for her [1] ? --YanikB (talk) 20:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

If a work has multiple authors (such as one person creating a photo and one person making significant creative modifications to it), all authors have to agree to release it under a free license (and you'd need to provide evidence of that as well). —LX (talk, contribs) 20:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

OK, She will put the copyright Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 license on her side. Thank you and sorry for the bad translation.

--YanikB (talk) 20:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Julie Saint-Pierre.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Julie Saint-Pierre.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Cohentracht (talk) 14:46, 3 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Food

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Curd Rice

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, we are going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up as a volunteer or sign up on behalf of your affiliate here.--Abhinav619 (talk) 05:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merci

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

La seule chose pour Distribution aux consommateurs, le slogan serait mieux pas en italique, c’est tout.

L’article MATV à la phrase: En 1998, le TCV Vidéotron est renommé..., le mot le est de trop et devrait être effacé.

Aussi finalement, le texte source Ici, ce serait bien si tu sélectionnerais tout le texte source, le copier et le remplacer au texte source de l’article: Le SuperClub Vidéotron français, car se serait à jour pour les logos etc... présentement le résultat n’est pas bon car c’est un texte source adapté pour Wikipédia français, tu va le constater...

C’est quand-même facile et plus rapide ce qu’il reste à corriger!

Merci encore😉👍--185.92.26.127 21:28, 18 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

1 - @The42grabber: a fait le travail.

2 -

Done

3 - Malheureusement je n'ajouterai pas le texte que vous proposez, la source est primaire.

Finalement, pour les demandes concernant WP:fr veuillez passer par ici et idéalement par là. Merci, --YanikB (talk) 13:10, 21 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Manoir Panet.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Manoir Panet.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Edgar Gariépy died in 1956: this is not PD and definitely not CC-BY-SA 4.0. Banq.qc.ca only allows some specific use which is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

AntonierCH ^(d) 12:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merci pour ton soutient

Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Salut,

Désolé d'avoir mis autant de temps à t'écrire. Je suis obligé de t'écrire ici car je suis bloqué sur Wikipédia, justement à cause du « passage en force ». Donc pour Frederick Barrett, je rédigeais un assez bon article s'appuyant sur des sources fiables et différentes, et je ne sais pour quelle raison Pierrette13 supprimait tout systématiquement, sans autre raison que je m'appuyais une source non fiable, alors que Encyclopedia Titanica est assez fiable. Et Frederick Barrett est actuellement un article très minable comme s'il n'y avait quasiment aucune source alors que tu as vu le potentiel qu'il avait dans ma version. Je me doutais bien qu'elle faisait enfait tout ça pour me mettre un bâton dans les roues, car elle me détestait... Surtout que ce sujet me passionnait et j'étais hyper motivé ; ça m'a donc un peu dégoûté de contribuer sur Wikipédia. Je me sentais seul et impuissant face à quelqu'un qui avait pourtant des arguments bidon, tels que Encyclopedia Titanica est un forum, ce qui est complètement faux. Mais heureusement tu es arrivé pour me montrer ton soutient et je t'en remercie infiniment. Tous tes arguments étant du béton, j'espère que Pierrette13 et les autres comprendront. Étant bloqué, je ne peux pas faire grand chose, mais dès que je suis débloqué je te recontacte.

Force à toi,

Schweiz41 (talk) 07:09, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour user:Schweiz41, cette pierrette (ou pierrot) n'est pas très amène avec les contributeurs de biographies. Lorsque ton blocage sera terminer fais moi une demande de parrainage, je serai en mesure de te protéger. Un conseil, lors de ton retour change de pseudo car tu pourrais être stigmatisé en raison de tes blocages. C'est comme ça sur WP on te remet toujours sur le nez tes blocages précédents. Surtout évite de te créer un nouveau compte avant la fin de ton blocage car tu serais vite repéré et rebloqué pour 4 mois. --YanikB (talk) 10:49, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Parfait, c'est noté ! Merci pour ton aide, ton soutient et ta volonté de me prendre sous ton aile. Ça me montre que pas tous les Wikipédiens sont comme Pierrette13. Et merci pour ton conseil de changer mon nom d'utilisateur, je le ferai. Mon absence en raison du blocage risque de durer, mais je te promets que je n'oublie pas et te recontacte le moment venu. Merci et à un bientôt je l'espère. -- Schweiz41 (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Schweiz41: Je t'avais pourtant avertis. --YanikB (talk) 12:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Rebonjour. Depuis que j'ai été bloqué sur Wikipédia en français, je me suis mis à contribuer sur Wikipédia en anglais (mais franchement je préfère largement la version en français que je trouve beaucoup plus attractive (couleurs, mise en forme, etc.), plus claire et mieux en ordre). J'ai fait par exemple cette modification, qui montre que j'ai compris que je perdais tu temps à faire des modifications par exemple uniquement pour modifier les redirections. En effet, elle montre mon implication et le fait que j'ai un réel intérêt à contribuer, car j'ai apporté plein de nouveau contenu (d'ailleurs très sourcé), de nouvelles images, et bien encore ! Ainsi, si mon comportement posait un réel problème et que je continuais ces modifications inutiles, je serais aussi exclu de ce Wikipédia, ce qui n'est pas du tout le cas, et même plus, je n'ai eu aucune remarque négative ou reproche (juste un message pour me dire de sourcer un minimum un article, mais ce n'est pas une remarque grave). Ainsi, si je contribue sans aucun problème Wikipédia en anglais, je ne vois pas la raison pour laquelle je devrais rester bloqué sur Wikipédia français. Qu'en penses-tu ? Bien à toi ! -- Schweiz41 (talk) 11:21, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Schweiz41: Tu as été bloqué indef sur WP:fr pour contournement de blocage [2]. Si tu veux y contribuer de nouveau, il faut que tu te crée un nouveau compte et que tu te tiennes pénard. --YanikB (talk) 11:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Rebonjour après un mois. Peux-je donc faire un nouveau départ en me créant un nouveau compte, en me tenant bien sûr parfaitement ? Et concrètement, si je me tiens bien, et que les administrateurs savent par le suite que je suis l'ex-Schweiz41, sont-ils en droit de me reprocher de contourner mon blocage, même si mon comportement est irréprochable ? Bonne journée. -- Schweiz41 (talk) 09:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Si tu contribue avec un nouveau compte, et comme tu n'est pas banni de WP:fr, ce n'est pas un contournement de blocage. Mais si tu fais des vagues, ce nouveau compte sera vite bloqué indef. --YanikB (talk) 11:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Ericka-Cruz.jpg

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ericka-Cruz.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ericka-Cruz.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ytoyoda (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Deleted content

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ /−

Hello YanikB, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:Ericka-Cruz.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 08:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:François-Legault.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:François-Legault.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:59, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Jean-Jacques-Bertrand.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Jean-Jacques-Bertrand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Webfil (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Midjourney.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonjour, Si ce portrait ne ressemble pas à Michel Audiard, enlever la cravate avec MS Paint est inutile. Yann (talk) 12:44, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Yann: On peut supprimer c'était, évidemment, une blague. --YanikB (talk) 12:49, 9 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic