Wvk
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
Request for High Res Scan of Theatr Shahr
editHello Wvk,
I am writing a book on the architecture of Iran and I have noticed a picture you have uploaded almost 10 years ago.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Shahrtheater.jpg
I would like to ask, do you have the original document? Can you have it scanned at 600 DPI and send it to my email?
Thanks Reza — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.235.161.10 (talk) 20:08, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
This is My Email FYI [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.235.161.10 (talk) 20:10, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Gadget for DRs
editWelcome back as an administrator. (assuming no one will complain anymore about the bureaucracy, I hope.) You might want to use Help:Gadget-DelReqHandler for quicker processing of deletion requests. It will also automatically include in the log entry a link to the corresponding DR page, which will help people to see the background of the deletion. whym (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
File:800px-Iraj afshar.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File tagging File:TudorCageShiraz1971.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:TudorCageShiraz1971.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:TudorCageShiraz1971.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
File:Amini Family.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Copyright status: File:The Russo-British Pact in 1907.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:The Russo-British Pact in 1907.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
I removed {{PD-old-70}}, {{PD-old}} or similar templates from the files whose authors who died less then 70 years ago. Now the files have no license and unless it is fixed will be deleted in a week. If you know of other reason why those files are in public domain please feel free to add a new license template and alert me and I will remove {{No license}} tag. If you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
RE:Forms of government
editI have read your message and I am aware of Iran's case. And you are right. Iran should not be there, also because in encyclopaedias Iran is considered a theocracy and not a republic, despite the name "Islamic Republic of Iran". It would be wise to create a special colour for a such a system. --B.Lameira (talk) 22:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
De-adminship warning
editDear Wvk, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 22:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
File:Rezashahmustafakemal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, INeverCry 21:23, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
- "According to article 13, copyright of the works which produced on order by an employer belongs to the employer for a period of thirty years from the date of production. In cases where the work belongs to a legal personality or rights are transferred to a legal personality, it will go into the public domain after 30 years from the date of publication or public presentation (Article 16)." - The mausoleum was build on order of the goverment of Iran and the rights belong to the Iranian goverment. All rights have been transfered to the government, which means that it is public domain after 30 years of the building has been presentetd to the public. Keep!--Wvk (talk) 07:20, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Kabineyekodeta.jpg
editThis media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kabineyekodeta.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Kabineyekodeta.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Jcb (talk) 23:13, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- This photo has been published widely in Iran since 1921 and is therefor public domain according to the Copyright Law of Iran.--Wvk (talk) 10:46, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
File:Famine and Genocide in Iran.jpg
editThe claim that this picture has been taken in Iran is false, it's actually a photo of holocaust. Just look for it in google. Writing it here as I'm not sure what I have to do in such cases. Thanks. Ms96 (talk) 18:12, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Yeprem Khan tehran.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hallo Wvk,
du hattest diese Datei wiederhergestellt, weil eine Genehmigung vorliege. Es hat aber niemand eine OTRS-Genehmigung eingetragen. Was hat es damit auf sich? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 10:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ich hatte nix von einer OTRS-Genehmigung geschrieben, sondern angegeben, dass der Löschgrund "Keine Quelle" entfallen ist. Der Uploader hatte mich angeschrieben, dass er nun eine Quelle aufgetan habe. Die Autorenschaft ist aber nach wie vor ungeklärt. Ich hatte hier mal "Im Zweifel für den Angeklagten" entschieden, da das Bild schon älteren Datums ist. Grüße --Wvk (talk) 08:10, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hallo Wvk,
- bemängelt wurde von mir ursprünglich nicht die fehlende Quelle, sondern die fehlende Genehmigung bzw. mangelnde Angaben zum Urheber. Dein Wiederherstellungskommentar lautete “Source, permission available”, so dass ich von einer vorliegenden Genehmigung ausging.
- Ich habe Löschantrag auf die Datei gestellt. "Ca. 1930" kann man als älteren Datums ansehen, es ist aber auf keinen Fall alt genug, dass ein Urheber auf jeden Fall schon mindestens 70 Jahre tot ist. Genaueres im Löschantrag. Für Dateien gilt auf Commons übrigens "Im Zweifel gegen den Angeklagten", siehe Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 15:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
- Kein Poblem - habe es so auch dem uploader erklärt. Gruß --Wvk (talk) 16:33, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
- Ich habe Löschantrag auf die Datei gestellt. "Ca. 1930" kann man als älteren Datums ansehen, es ist aber auf keinen Fall alt genug, dass ein Urheber auf jeden Fall schon mindestens 70 Jahre tot ist. Genaueres im Löschantrag. Für Dateien gilt auf Commons übrigens "Im Zweifel gegen den Angeklagten", siehe Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 15:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
File talk:Papamobil EO5P1233-2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file talk, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
De-adminship warning
editDear {{subst:PAGENAME}}. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you --B dash (talk) 02:25, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
File:PB2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:CinemaRexFire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
De-adminship warning (Feb 2020)
editDear Wvk. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2020 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
|
File:Banner of the Sur-e Esrafil newspaper.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
File:Banner of the Sur-e Esrafil newspaper.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:ShahKennedy.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:Carter guadeloupe.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
File:ShahCarter.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:00, 4 September 2023 (UTC)