Wojsyl

Conwy Castle

Hi Wojsyl, and welcome to the Commons! I noticed your photo Image:Wales Conwy castle 2.jpg. It looks like you painted out the sky with some photo-editing software. If you still have the original version, it would be wonderful if you'd upload it (with the same file name). Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 06:44, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image:Wilanow palace.jpg

Witaj, usunalem to zdjecie z kategorii Warsaw, poniewaz zostalo umieszczone w artykule Warszawa w tej kategorii. Poniewaz w drzewie kategorii i artykulow sa one jedno pod drugim, nie ma potrzeby zeby to zdjecie (jak i wszystkie pozostale z artykulu) byly w tych dwoch miejscah naraz.

pozdrawiam Meteor2017 29 June 2005 22:53 (UTC)

A ja na odwrot - uwazam ze umieszczanie w artykule i kategorii (nie mowie o roznoleglych) za szkodliwe. Wyobraz sobie jakby wygladala Kategoria Warszawa nawet obecnie, gdyby wszystkie zdjecia z artykulu by tam obecnie byly ;) Jak bedzie potrzeba to sie rozdzieli na mniejsze artykuly i podlinkuje, albo co innego. Meteor2017 29 June 2005 23:10 (UTC)

Jesli tak na to patrzec, to masz racje. Natomiast nie usuwam po to tylko zeby ladnie wygladalo, ale wlasnie po to zeby latwiej bylo cos konkretnego wyszukac. Jesli wszystko co jest w artykulach kategorii umiescic takze w tej kategorii (a tak trzeba byloby postapic, by zachowac strukture bazy danych), to powstaje chaos w ktorym trudno cokolwiek znalezc (jesli plikow jest duzo - w Warszawie ponad 100) - jako opis sa tylko nazwy plikow nadawane od Sasa do Lasa. Wydaje mi sie, ze taka kategoria jest miejscem na pliki ktorych nie obejmuja bardziej szczegolowe kategorie i artykuly, lub jeszcze nie zakwalifikowane do nich.

Jesli teraz ktos do kategorii Warsaw wrzuci kilka plikow, to beda one widoczne i szybko moga byc znalezione lub umieszczone np. w artykule Warszawa we wlasciwym miejscu. Jesli bedzie tam 100, 200 czy naet wiecej plikow, to kilku nowych najprawdopodobniej nikt nie zauwazy, a malo charakterystyczny budynek z nazwa typu Warsaw_building03_jpg bedzie trudny do znalezienia, nawet jesli ktos go wlasnie szuka.

Bylo jeszcze cos takiego: Commons:Bar#Polskie kategorie, wymienione byly trzy kategorie, ale mysle ze argumenty i apel dotycza wszystkich w ktorych mamy do czynienia z duza iloscia zdjec. Meteor2017 30 June 2005 08:16 (UTC)

Aha, rozumiem :) I jestem sklonny sie zgodzic z ta struktura kategorii. Ale jesli stworzyc kategorie do Warszawy, to chyba rownie dobrze mozna grafiki tam umieszczac z poziomu kategorii jak i artykulu? Meteor2017 30 June 2005 08:43 (UTC)

Kategorie w artykule czy w obrazku?

Witam, Zacząłem niedawno działać na commons i również przerzucałem zdjęcia z kategorii Warsaw do artykułu Warszawa. Przeczytałem wcześniej Pierwsze_kroki, gdzie jest wyraźnie napisane: Utwórz na Commons artykuł zawierający podstawowe informacje, miniaturkę (thumb) grafiki lub link do pliku oraz kategorie (uwaga: kategoria powinna być dodana do artykułu, nie do strony pliku). Z czego wynika, że ładując zdięcie Warszawy powinienem je dodać do art. Warszawa i nie dopisywać Category:Warsaw do pliku. Jeżeli takie postępowanie nie jest właściwe to należy jak najszybciej zmienić instrukcję dla początkujących, bo inaczej wszyscy nowi będą tak postępować co trudno mieć im za złe. Kuba G 30 June 2005 10:48 (UTC)

Vilnius StNicholas Orthodox church vs St. Parasceve Orthodox Church in Vilnius

Pomylka (piekne zreszta zdiecia): Image:Vilnius StNicholas Orthodox church.jpg w rzeczywistosci to St. Parasceve Orthodox Church i vice versa. -- Alma Pater 6 July 2005 23:45 (UTC)

Image:Scotland Urquhart castle.jpg

Hi there! Looks like you forgot to give the castle photo a license tag. Did you take the photo yourself, and if so, what {{Commons:Copyright tags|copyright license]] is it under? -- Ranveig 09:20, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

Image:Scotland Glenelg broch.jpg

Nice picture of one of the Glenelg brochs. As you'll probably know, there are two: Dun Telve is the first you reach going east up Glen Beag, and is on the floor of the glen near the river. and Dun Troddan is a few hundred metres further east up on the hillside, both quite near the road. From the not very good photos I have in books it looks like Dun Troddan: can you confirm this? ...Dave souza 14:24, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I'm almost sure that's the second (the higher) one. Thanks. Wojsyl 15:20, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Kategorie dla gatunków

Czy jest jakieś zalecenie, żeby tworzyć kategorie dla pojedynczych gatunków? Bo właśnie jedną usunęłem... A.J. 10:24, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Poland Warsaw Wilanow.jpg

Ups! Sorry! I saw it is actually a duplicate of Image:Wilanow min.jpg... --Dodo 17:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:MiG-23.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MiG-23.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{Cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Nilfanion 20:20, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

synagoga w Kownie

Zupełnie nie rozumiem powodu zgłoszenia do likwidacji grafiki, używanej w dwóch projektach (pl.wikipedia.org: Synagoga w Kownie oraz nn.wikipedia.org: Bilete av synagogar) na korzyść drugiej, niemal nieodróżnialnej od pierwotnej (domyślam się, że jest jej czterokrotnie skompresowaną wersją). Nie ma moim zdaniem żadnego uzasadnienia, aby ją kasować tym bardziej, że zlikwidowane grafiki i tak pozostają w odchłani serwerów jako skasowane wersje, zatem nie ma w tym śladu oszczędności dysków serwerów wiki.

Julo 19:05, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Wydaje mi się, że przez pomyłkę wrzuciłem dwa razy to samo zdjęcie pod różnymi nazwami ... Wojsyl 19:38, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

PS. Poprawiłem linki w pl.wikipedia.org i nn.wikipedia.org

Userpage

I suggest you not redirect your userpage to a category, if you do, people won't have a page about you. - Patricksheridan|^TALK|HISTORY 12:42, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks but this was intended. My contributions should speak about me, hence the redirect. Wojsyl 18:51, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lithuania Vilnius TV Tower Soviet attack plans.jpg

Greetings. Could you provide some information regarding the origin of this image? Is this a photo of the actual plans? Where did you find the plans that you could photograph them? Where may the original be seen? All of this is and would be useful information for inclusion on this photograph. This is especially important as it is used in a Wikipedia article. A source is important information to have. Thank you. --205.157.110.11 19:30, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Aka Lendorien [1] on Wikipedia.

Indeed. I took it at an exhibition about the January 1991 events in Vilnius. Wojsyl 19:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Temporary delay with new image

Just wanted to let you know that the renamed UPA image was deleted by Sieband. I inquired regarding this here. This adds extra work in that new descriptions will have to be reinserted back again, once the image is back up.--Riurik 23:34, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Am going to re-upload with the same name, but original resolution. Should be up in a sec. --Riurik 18:17, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

Source missing?

Wojsyl, excuse my language but what the hell kind of time to bring this up?!! This is the same darn picture, which I initially nominated for deletion here and it was discussed by us. You raised an objection and I agreed with you to rename it. Why did you not point out this "essential information" at that point to save both of our time? Now, after the image has been renamed, deleted, and reuploaded again you tag it as missing "essential info?" For all I care, the file can go down the memory hole, but I am puzzled as to the timing of your actions.--Riurik 21:00, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

You are right, but I missed this earlier, I'm sorry. I thought the photo could be useful even if it was uploaded in bad faith, and as you know I've relinked a couple of the articles to the newly named image on pl.wiki, but do you have any idea of who the supposed author of this picture "watacha" is ? The authorship may be as fake as the original image caption, don't you think ? Wojsyl 18:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright then. I agree. The authorship is definitely suspect, and I have no clue as to the identity of "watacha." Oh well, see you around.--Riurik 20:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:MR 1932 small.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MR 1932 small.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ([email protected]).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 10:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Geocoding

Hello Wojsyl, at the Geocoding project we have noticed that you uploaded a number of pictures from one of the less covered regions on earth. Maybe you could consider adding coordinates to some of your images. They will show up on the WikiMiniAtlas and the Google Earth Commons-layer. You can find instructions on how to add coordinates to your images at Commons:Geocoding. Thank you in advance! The Geocoding team --EugeneZelenko 15:02, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi, which region specifically did you have in mind ? Pls take a look at Category:User:Wojsyl. Thanks. Wojsyl 15:52, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Ideally all of them :-) However, from own experience it's much easer to add coordinates for places which I knows :-) And of cource, it's depends on avaliability of hi-res satellite images...

If you will take a look on Google Earth layer, Poland, Lithuania, Ukraine, Slovakia, Hungary, Greece are not covered too much (or not covered at all). I personally would like to see geocoded images Poland and Lithuania, but you could ignore my preferences :-)

EugeneZelenko 16:00, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Is this the location of the object or the camera that should be used for geocoding ? Wojsyl 12:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Camera location. Thank you for your efforts! --EugeneZelenko 14:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Sometimes I'm using rather large zoom when taking photos, and I'm afraid that marking a camera location could yield unexpected results then. Wojsyl 15:53, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

In any case camera position is approximation, so small errors are unavoidable :-(. I think Commons talk:Geocoding is good place to discuss this issue in details. --EugeneZelenko 13:44, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! OM Storr 2004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Image:Lithuania Centre of Europe.jpg

For your information: This image is used by the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet, see http://www.dagbladet.no/magasinet/2007/09/13/511966.html. Cheers, --Kjetil r 13:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks for the notice. Wojsyl 06:12, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lithuania Kaunas Devlis Museum.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Lithuania Kaunas Devlis Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--A.J. (talk) 14:35, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Deletion discussion

Hello, looking at a previous deletion nomination of File:Historisches deutsches Sprachgebiet.PNG I saw you voted for deletion. I renominated that image; it would be of great help if you'd again list your opposition to it. Thank you.HP1740-B (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Wojsyl!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Berlin Reichstag 2005.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Pioneers Project

Hello,

I am a Canadian video producer and social worker (located in Edmonton, Alberta) making this request on behalf of the Alberta College of Social Workers (www.acsw.ca) for your permission to use the following photo:

800px-Slovakia_Oravsky#22A0

For the program on Ernie Schlesinger, A Canadian Social Worker who is originally from Slovakia.

With your permission we would use this photo/grab to visually enhance the context in our ’pioneers of social work in Alberta’ video project on the history of social work in Alberta. This documenting of Alberta’s social work pioneers is to be used for educational and archival purposes; also, the College will be placing selected footage on their website.

I would be happy to answer any questions you may have with respect to obtaining your permission. And I would like to thank you for your time and attention to this request.

Sincerely,

Duane Bodard Burton, BSW, RSW, M.Ed. Project Producer

email: [email protected]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Klaipeda Annchen.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Lithuania Vilnius TV Tower Soviet attack plans.jpg

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Lithuania Vilnius TV Tower Soviet attack plans.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Sealle (talk) 23:57, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Frederic_Chopin

Frederic Chopin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:35, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Lithuania Vilnius TV Tower.jpg

And also:

• File:Vilnius TV tower.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

User licence

Dear Wojsyl, I would like to use your Noszvaj photo in a study. How can I licence it? Thanks

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Vilnius Mindaugas monument.jpg

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:32, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Lithuania Kierniów Vytautas Monument.jpg

File:Lithuania Kierniów Vytautas Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)