Wojciech Pędzich
Please note that as a rule I do not usually follow other users' talk pages. I might take a peek or three, but please, do not take following the threads for granted (it's an old habit, very hard to root out, although I am trying).
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
M@rcin Suwalczan [talk•dyskusja] 10:57, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Deleted Socrates on Trial playbill image
editHi. May I ask why the colour poster image was deleted from the Socrates on Trial page? (The copyright holder gave permission for it to be moved into the public domain.) Thanks.
Uploading pictures from other Wikipedias
editPlease, when uploading images from other Wikipedias, use: http://tools.wikimedia.de/~magnus/commonshelper.php . And please, put a warning on the original image in order to eliminate it afterwards. Dantadd✉ 00:38, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Twój głos
editDziękuję. Takich odpowiedzialnych ludzi oby więcej. Nie wiem co wg Ciebie ma moja praca na commons do tego co zrobiłem i za co odebrano mi uprawnienia na plWiki. Widać masz mierne pojęcie o mojej działalności a głos Twego pokroju jest postrzegany przez niektórych zadufanych w sobie użytkowników commons za dobry omen.
Dla wytłumaczenia Twego odpowiedzialnego głosu wstawiam Tobie zgodę otrzymaną od WKU na wykorzystywanie ich materiałów. Ale nie wiem, czy będziesz na tyle chętny aby przejrzeć do jakich wstawionych zdjęć kilku mądrali się z tego projektu czepia: File:Zgoda Komendanta WKU Gdynia - Wikipedia.jpeg oraz File:BiuroHydrograficzneMarynarkiWojennej - zgoda.JPG. Tak się składa, ze tego typu zgody, trzeba wychodzić i być upierdliwym do bólu. Działania GeorgeHH, Siebranda, którzy nawet nie pofatygowali się aby wysłać maila w języku angielskim do ww. instytucji (są na stronach internetowych) a zarzucają mi łamanie praw autorskich są nikczemne. Nikczemny był również Twój głos, bo nawet nie spojrzałeś o co chodzi. Doprawdy przestaje mnie dziwić opinia o Polakach na świecie... Joymaster 18:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Wikipstryk
editProszę o przetłumaczenie tego i tego --Wyksztalcioch (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
OTRS ticket check
editHello Wpedzich,
Could you please check this tcket concerning this and this image? If everything is oké, could you replace the {{OTRS pending}} with {{ticketnumber}} and otherwise give your opinion in the DR? Thank you! Cheers, Ciell (talk) 11:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Polish speaking OTRS agent requested
editSee this thread. I'm not sure how urgent it really is.--Chaser (talk) 01:06, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
- Image:Mieczysław Ostojski.jpg was uncategorized on 13 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
Fotopolska
editTak, jeszcze nawet nie zacząłem importu :). Zresztą: Commons:Bots/Requests/YarluFileBot. Yarl ✉ 20:15, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, we Fixed installed the required license for public documents Template:PD-RU-exempt -(CPI-RUS) 13:15, 22 February 2012
Your RfA
editHey. Just wanted to let you know that your RfA has been closed as successful and you are now a local administrator at Commons. Nice work! Please feel free to ask me if you have any questions, but I'm sure you know how all this works. Have fun. :) –Juliancolton | Talk 21:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- Welcome to the team. You may find User:Jameslwoodward/Commons notes for administrators useful. Feel free to edit or add to it. Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:59, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Józef Pławski
editCześć! Zdjęcie zostało wykonane przed 1939 rokiem na terenie woj. nowogródzkiego (miejsce nieznane) i od początku jest rękach rodziny. Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 12:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Gdzie mogę to zmienić? Przepraszam za kłopot, ale jestem nowicjuszem na wiki. Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 12:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Cześć! Zastosowałem się do Twojej wskazówki, ale pojawiło się pytania: "To uploader: Please provide where and when the image was first published." To zdjęcie w żadnej oficjalnej publikacji nie było opublikowane. Było wydane mojemu dziadkowi w 1939 roku. Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 12:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Cześć! Mam nadzieję, że to będzie juz ostatnie pytanie, gdzie i w jaki sposób wstawić "private archive"? Z góry dziękuję :) --Marzej (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Bardzo serdecznie dziękuję za Twoją pomoc :) Rozumiem, że już nic więcej nie muszę robić/akceptować etc, czy tak? Miło mieć pomocną osobę, która chce pomóc :) Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 12:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Cześć! Mam nadzieję, że to będzie juz ostatnie pytanie, gdzie i w jaki sposób wstawić "private archive"? Z góry dziękuję :) --Marzej (talk) 12:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
- Cześć! Zastosowałem się do Twojej wskazówki, ale pojawiło się pytania: "To uploader: Please provide where and when the image was first published." To zdjęcie w żadnej oficjalnej publikacji nie było opublikowane. Było wydane mojemu dziadkowi w 1939 roku. Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 12:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Józef Pławski
editDodałem kolejne zdjęcie :) Zerknij, jezeli masz czas i ochotę na dwa hasła:
Józef Pławski Aleksander Zejdler
Będę zobowiązany za wszelkie uwagi :) Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 12:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Józef Pławski
editDodałem zdjęcie Aleksander_Zejdler_2.jpg, do którego pojawił się dziwny komentarz. O co może tym razem chodzić? Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 13:08, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Józef Pławski
editPo wpisaniu PD-Polish jest chyba ok. Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 13:21, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
OTRS
editHi, Wpedzich. I suspect the status of copyright of some image uploaded by Cretanforever. But I don't know OTRS system well. When you have time, could you control whether OTRS tickets on these images are valid or not. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
RE: Bilet ulgowy
editTo w końcu chodzi tutaj o prawa do projektu biletu czy prawa do pliku? MrSpectre (talk) 08:48, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Bilet ulgowy
editPopatrzyłem tutaj i zrobiłem tak, jak zrobił tak użytkownik. Myślałem, że jest dobrze. Ale skoro nie jest to proszę o podanie mi wskazówek, jak powinienem to zrobić. MrSpectre (talk) 09:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Dowiedziałeś się już czegoś na ten temat? MrSpectre (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Bardzo dziękuję za pomoc. :) MrSpectre (talk) 20:53, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Dowiedziałeś się już czegoś na ten temat? MrSpectre (talk) 17:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyrighted material
editOK, I understand. However, on reading the extant template on en:Wiki for this logo[[w:en:File:Jewish_Relief_Agency.jpg],|I understood it could be used in accordance with the terms specified thereby (which I did, by repeating them on the respective page). At any rate, as you say, the resolution is poor and I'll let it go... Ciao.--Monozigote] (talk) 12:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- Right. So what should I have done instead? Or could not do anything?... I wasn't too clear about how to re-state the copyrighted template. If you explain to me what to do, I'll do it next time, as I'm seeing many logos on en:Wikipedia with a USA only permission (for a specific Wikipedia article), but which could be otherwise used if properly categorised with the right template etc. Then I might use them some other time, when need arises. Let me know, if you can. Thanx.--Monozigote (talk) 14:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
Curious
editon why you are deleting from from the Category:Images from FilmiTadka. I see a lot of deleted files in my watchlist and I am failing to understand the reason.
(Deletion log); 16:27 . . Wpedzich (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Model posing her back in a ghagra choli at Dazzle Bash Show, Dubai, 2008.jpg (Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing)
--Sreejith K (talk) 11:08, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Have you read the first statement in the page Category:Images from FilmiTadka? If not, please do now. --Sreejith K (talk) 11:35, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
I am very concerned about your block here, and speedy deletion of images. The user, as best I can see, has had 1 warning for out of scope, and that was over a year ago. Suddenly indefing them, as best I can see for no good reason, is not good practice. I have unblocked them. I don't doubt the user was a bit annoying, but they really did nothing particularly wrong, certainly not indef-worthy. I accept most of the images are hardly brilliant quality, but when they had been on Commons for more than a year, and the subject is within scope, they should have been sent to DR rather then speedied. I request you undelete File:Erigierter Penis mit Ring.jpg and File:Samenerguss.JPG, the others are admittedly pretty awful. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, and when you block someone, always leave a message on their talk page, preferably one from Commons:Message_templates#Blocked. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:38, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hate to do it, but OK... Commons is not yer amateur pornsite and it is rather hard fo r me to see the scope of the project reflected in the files. Hard to extract meaningful purpose. Wpedzich (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Out of scope is not really suitable as a speedy reason for images which have been around a long time. Use them on newly uploaded spam sure, or things which are clearly just adverts, but images which are within the educational scope of the project (which includes sexuality), just bad quality etc, should be handled by DR. -mattbuck (Talk) 16:48, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hate to do it, but OK... Commons is not yer amateur pornsite and it is rather hard fo r me to see the scope of the project reflected in the files. Hard to extract meaningful purpose. Wpedzich (talk) 16:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Deleting Minecraft logo screeenshot
editHello. Why did you do that deletion? http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Minecraft&diff=42675513&oldid=42674715 Its ok with license: «You're free to do whatever you want with screenshots and videos of the game». http://www.minecraft.net/terms --Ohar (talk) 19:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Copyright images
editWell I wasn't done yet putting the copyrights stuff so you have to wait first. PatrickA.Tagle35 (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Logo
editWitam, reprezentuję firmę PANEK S.A. która posiada pełną licencję do używania Logo, jeśli takie zaświadczenie jest potrzebne do zatwierdzenia go mogę je przesłać na podany przez Pana adres mailowy.
Rotations
edit"All of the images uploaded had been previously rotated but were seemingly returned to their original aspect on upload.--SM1 (talk) 09:17, 10 April 2012 (UTC)"
The above is an extract from my talk page in response to your comment - in other words it is appreciated that there is work involved in rotating the images, but this does not mean that uers have not rotated them previously only to discover once uploaded to Wikimedia that they need to be rotated again. Of course with so many different graphics software packages on the market, this issue is unlikely to be resolved unless the Rotatebot software can be made freely available to all users, or accessible to all users via Wikimedia. In the meantime, as I now have had images sitting for several days without implementation of the requested rotations, what needs to be done to complete these requests? Thanks for your help and advice.--SM1 (talk) 10:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
all right you can delete this file, i maked a new one where google gis inst visible so sory for disturb
spoko rozumie usunalem juz elementy google, prawde mowiac sluzyly mi one jedynie jako punkt odniesienia
Błędne kategorie i lansowanie swojej wersji historii
editDzień dobry. Zgłosiłem właśnie dwa poniższe zagadnienia do admina "Sfu", wiem że nikt nie przebywa tu "non-stop" i dlatego proszę o zwrócenie na poniższe także innych polskojęzycznych adminów. pozdr
Category:Personifications of Poland
editW tej kategorii jako 3 i 4 plik znajdują się plakat niemieckich nazistowskich władz okupacyjnych w Polsce i propagandowy plakat niemiecki z okresu plebiscytu na G. Śląsku - żaden z nich nie jest ani personifikacją ani też symbolem Polski tylko propagandystycznym narzędziem twórcy plakatu. Pliki 6,7,8,9 są znaczkami pocztowymi Generalnej Gubernii - wymowa ideologiczna tych znaczków to "Goralenvolk - Germanie" i blonwłosi Polacy to potomkowie "Germanów". Przypisujący te pliki do owej kategorii (jako użytkownik zalogowany wielonickowiec z pacynkami i IP) wielokrotnie sprawił już sporo kłopotów na wiki.pl, wiki.en i wiki.de stosując własne "prawdy" oparte na "źródłach" pseudonaukowych. Zwróciłem mu kilka razy uwagę, niestety spotkałem się z agresją i obrazą. Bardzo proszę o zwrócenie uwagi na przytoczone przeze mnie przykłady.
Category:Polish areas annexed by Soviet Union
editDotyczy tego samego użytkownika co wyżej. [1], [2] i [3] dokonał kolejnego revertu wg własnej wizji historii. Obszary te po ataku na ZSRR nigdy nie zostały zaanektowane przez III Rzeszę, zawsze miały status obszarów zajętych (po niemiecku Besetzte Gebiete). Użytkownik nie widzi różnicy pomiędzy "okupacją a aneksją", "Besetzung a Annexion", "Military occupation a Annexation" i świadomie wprowadza sfoją wersję historii opartą na fałszu. Obawiam się, że niestety jest to czubek przysłowiowej góry lodowej i pod swoimi wieloma nickami "zasiał" na commonsie więcej takich "kwiatków". 77.187.26.183 11:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Upload company logo
editHi, how can I upload a company logo to wikimedia (I would like to add it to this article: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberty_Direct). We work for Liberty Direct, but actually they don't know who is the original author of this logo. Can I just put "Liberty Direct" as author?
Logo
editDziękuję za informację. Logo jest własnością firmy - czy może Pan podać informacje w jaki sposób jeszcze raz załączyć plik przypisując do niego odpowiednie uprawnienia licencyjne, które posiadamy.
Logo
editbardzo dziękuję za rzetelną informację, po przeczytaniu wskazanych przez Pana artykułów wiemy już jak działać z wpisem, natomiast co do logo musimy to rzeczywiście rozważyć, przepraszam za zamieszanie, ale rozpoznanie tych wszystkich zawiłości prawnych i wymagań edycji haseł wbrew pozorom wymaga trochę czasu.
Hello Wpedzich,
I had kept this logo as below the threshold of originality in a proper deletion request, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:MTS-2010.gif. Now you speedy delete it as copyvio. Why? In such as case, at the very least another deletion request seems to be indicated, not a speedy deletion. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 12:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I have undeleted this. SCOPE should not generally be used for speedy deletions, as such arguments are often contested. I suggest a DR if you still feel it should be deleted. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Pytanko
editWobec wątpliwości proszę o odpowiedź na pytanie czy właściwie użyto licencji PD-Polish publikując ilustracje z książki wydanej w Białymstoku : AM, w 1975 r "XXV lat Akademii Medycznej im. J. Marchlewskiego w Białymstoku / [aut. Jan Rafał Olbromski i Jachia Ledziński]" (File:Sztandar AMB.jpg, File:1975 Pałac Branickich w Białymstoku.jpg, File:Konstanty Wiśniewski.jpg i inne? Tomasz Wachowski (talk) 12:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi Wpedzich, would you like to have the attack-vandal's edit-summaries removed or hidden from your talkpage-history? --Túrelio (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Túrelio; I'm fine with this, does not bother me much, so it can stay. Wpedzich (talk) 19:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
File:Aleksandrowicz Waclaw.jpg
editNie wątp :) To z samych początków działalności, nie wiedziałem jak z tym sobie radzić. Stare zdjęcia publikowane w polskich albumach z lat 80-tych oraz początku 90-tych PD-PRL. Ale jestem away i najwcześniej dam radę coś zrobić w weekend, jak odnajdę zdjęcia w książkach o ile mnie pamięć po 4 latach nie zawiedzie. Pozdrawiam --Pablo000 (talk) 21:14, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Bartkowiak Wladyslaw.jpg
editProszę poczekaj, większość zdjęć z albumu Ku czci Poległych Lotników z 1933 roku była publikowana w pracach z lat 80-tych w bibliotece Skrzydlatej polski. --Pablo000 (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
Zdjęcia użytkownika
editCześć!
Mógłbyś przejrzeć zdjęcia użytkownika I.Blu? Wydaje mi się, że są żywcem skopiowane ze strony Solarisa, wątpliwe, żeby miał prawa autorskie do nich. Poza tym nie mają kategorii i odpowiedniej licencji. Flyz1 (talk) 12:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
- Wrzucił je ponownie, ale zostały usunięte. Okazuje się jednak, że User:I.Blu legitymuje się zgodą od Solarisa na publikację zdjęć. Nie wiem teraz co z tym zrobić, więc wysyłam do admina Commons. Może faktycznie uda się wykorzystać zdjęcia ze strony Solarisa bez naruszania licencji. Flyz1 (talk) 11:45, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
This topic expect the prompt response from your side. This video is for Wikinews and it becomes obsolete with time. --sasha (krassotkin) 09:30, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
Usunięcie zdjec, i logo firmy PTAK
editPo raz kolejny skasował Pan moje zdjęcia i loga. Proszę o informację jak mam je zamieścić żeby był Pan ukontentowany. W Wikipedii funkcjonuje cała masa log, zdjęć firm, wizerunków prezesów i tak dalej. I jakoś ich Pan nie usuwa. Na czym to polega ?
HELP ME WITH IMAGES
editHi there thanks for unblock , now i want to place a logo for the mlp page i have the logo and its metadata in both my name and the label can i do this ? thanks
About "Black Heaven" picture
editHello, i would like to know if that doesn't represent a fair use of an image, i couldn't find the manga anywhere i search :/ so i could take a picture of it.
I'm sure this picture is under Fair use since i took it from Myanimelist which is a CC protection for images, please help me with that.
Please can i give you a link of the file, and then you upload the picture to wikipedia ? when i try to use the wikipedia uploader, they say i need 10 edits, but i really want this picture uploaded in a hurry, please can you help me, i saw that wikipedia has a fair use for official book covers, this is the link of the picture http://static1.minitokyo.net/view/45/03/147695.jpg
Thank you.
Sorry, here's the full website view of the picture http://gallery.minitokyo.net/view/147695, or you can google it to find similar images :) thank you very much, i can wait then, so please when you finish message me with infos :)
Copyright issue for screenshots from US films released before 1964
editHello again. While transferring some of the film poster files from en.wikipedia , I did discover some screenshots on commons from films before 1964 that I think are incorrectly tagged, and may need to be deleted. See Category:Written on the Wind (film) for examples. The tag on the individual images claims that the artist failed to provide a copyright notice. Before 1964, an artist needed to show a copyright notice to preserve copyright. It is true that each individual frame of a film does not have a copyright notice. However, essentially all the US films from this era had copyright notices, have had their copyrights renewed, and are thus not in the public domain yet. I think that screenshots are probably covered by these copyrights. This is a messy issue, and potentially a lot of work if mis-tagging is common. Cheers, Easchiff (talk) 12:24, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
magazine covers are copylefted
editGateavisa / Psykose is a free anarchist publication that encourages duplication and distribution of works published by them. They do not copyright my art! It is public domain via Copyleft!
Thanks Christian
Problem z Logotypami
editPrzepraszam, że niepokoję jeszcze raz w podobnym temacie, ale jest dla mnie niezrozumiałą sytuacją jedna rzecz i byłbym ogromnie wdzięczny za wyjaśnienie. Chcę do zaakceptowanego i przejrzanego wpisu na wikipedii dodać grafikę przedstawiającą logo, lub flagowy produkt danej marki (nie chodzi o reklamę, a po prostu uatrakcyjnienie wpisu). Jestem autorem grafiki, którą staram się dodać do wikimedia, mam zgodę firmy na wykorzystanie grafik (bo specjalnie dla nich została stworzona), prawo do działania w jej imieniu i mogę pozyskać nawet pisemną zgodę jeśli zajdzie taka potrzeba. W tej sytuacji - w jaki sposób dodać logo marki, lub zdjęcie flagowego produktu, aby nie zostało odrzucone? Sądząc po wielu zdjęciach znajdujących się w wikimedii/pedii tego typu zakładam, że samo występowanie logo na zdjęciu nie powinno być podstawą do zarzucania braku posiadania praw autorskich, ale może się mylę?
Wartburgi
editO to ciekawe. Nie zauważyłem tego przed uploadem, spróbuję jakoś poprawić. Aparat zdziczał, w podglądzie na powiększeniu też to widać. Pitak (talk) 10:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Problem z Logotypami - kontynuacja
editDzięki za długą i merytoryczną odpowiedź. Teraz w takim razie nie do końca rozumiem. Użytkownik INeverCry usunął wszystkie wrzucone przeze mnie zdjęcia mimo iż to nie były logotypy - to były zdjęcia/grafiki przygotowywane przez nas, na zlecenie obsługiwanej marki do wykorzystania których jestem uprawniony. Na jakiej więc zasadzie dane zdjęcie jest usuwane, a ja jestem oskarżany o łamanie praw autorskich - rozumiem, że ma to związek z tym, że grafika pojawiła się również poza zasobami wiki? Piszesz: Problem tylko, jesli ta grafika była już gdzies opublikowana, dajmy na to w materiałach na WWW firmy, wtedy konieczne jest pozwolenie. - w jaki sposób mam dostarczyć pozwolenie na wykorzystanie materiałów? Rozumiem, że należy wtedy skorzystać z OTRS i podanego przez Ciebie szablonu, ale generalnie sprawa tyczy się wielu brandów, które należą do jednej globalnej korporacji - na stronie nie ma danych kontaktowych, bo jest to strona wizerunkowa, wszystkie maile pracowników są korporacyjne, czyli nie np [email protected] tylko [email protected] (brand należy do korpo) - czy mail z takiej skrzynki wystarczy? Oczywiście nie chodzi o udostępnianie na wolnej licencji logo producenta, ale co najwyżej najbardziej rozpoznawalnego produktu (np butelka) - nie mamy wtedy żadnych przeciwwskazań, żeby ktoś sobie drukował to nawet na koszulkach. W formatce emaila do OTRS trzeba również podać link do pliku w wikimedia, skoro wszystkie pliki zostały usunięte, to do czego powinienem odnosić w celu weryfikacji praw autorskich? Wrzuciłbym je jeszcze raz, ale pewnie by się to skończyło tym razem banem, więc proszę o pomoc.
Please reinstate the video you deleted
editHi. I've left a message for you on my talk page. Thanks. Llywelyn2000 (talk) 14:56, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Quick question
editI saw you deleted a couple files from the commons for copyvio on the 15th, uploaded by Ketchuplegs13. My question is are these the same files that you already deleted once? If so they should probably be deleted again, since it seems the user just re-uploaded them under a different license. Nicoli Maege (talk) 15:11, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- Not a problem, glad to help out. Nicoli Maege (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
hello. This pic from http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=3815&picture=santa-claus-girl. As per the description, "Royalty free stock photos. All pictures are free for commercial and personal use." Therefore, please restore the deleted image. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 11:00, 2 April 2013 (UTC).
No probs. & Thanks for the speedy restoration. Hindustanilanguage (talk) 11:04, 2 April 2013 (UTC).
Quinoa logo
editHi, Thanks for your message. the Logo is created by FAO and available for all to use. See: http://www.fao.org/quinoa-2013/press-room/resources/en/. The page says "The International Year of Quinua logo is available for download. You can choose to download a zip file with all versions, or simply select one from the following list:"
Please let me know what I can do. The logo is cleared already on the English version of Quinoa page. I would appreciate if you can restore the logo.
Talk Back about my 21 images
editHello, Wojciech Pędzich. You have new messages at Nooruddin2020's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
File Permission
editCould you please undelete this file? Permission has been received by the copyright owner to release it under cc-by-sa-3.0. Ticket # 2013041210016572 Thanks! Mike V • Talk 06:33, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Purps_(Producer)
editI was given permission by the owner of this picture to upload it to his Wikipedia page: File:Purps Beats.jpg. If you could possibly tell me exactly what to do so that I may re upload the picture it would be helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guerilla323 (talk • contribs)
Hi Wpedzich, I've semi-protected your talkpage for 2 weeks. --Túrelio (talk) 22:17, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Copyright violation?
editWitam,
Proszę o wyjaśnienie masowego usunięcia przesłanych i opisanych plików mojego autorstwa. Pliki są zrzutami ekranu z aplikacji której Gistraxx B.V. jest bezpośrednim twórcą. Proszę o przywrócenie plików, których opisanie kosztowało jednak dużo cennego czasu.
File:Georychus_capensis.jpg w OTRS i pokrewne sprawy
editCześć. Mam prośbę o przyjrzenie się procedurze OTRS przesłanego przeze mnie pliku File:Georychus_capensis.jpg. Autorem zdjęcia kretoszczura jest profesor zoologii z Uniwersytetu Kapsztadzkiego. Prof. Bennett przesłał do mnie zdjęcie i wyraził w nim zgodę na CC-BY-SA. Zgoda została uznana przez członka OTRS za niewystarczającą. Otóż prof Bennett na moje zapytanie czy wyraża zgodę na włączenie przesłanego zdjęcia do repozytorium wikicommons na licencji CC-BY-SA, odpisał że tak, "wyraża zgodę na na używanie zdjęcia w wiki". Poprosiłem więc autora ponownie, by w zwięzłym zdaniu określił precyzyjniej, że wyraża zgodę na włączenie tego konkretnego zdjęcia zdjęcia do wikicommons na licencji Crative Commons CC-BY-SA. Maila takiego otrzymałem ponad tydzień temu i odbiłem do permission. Brak jednak reakcji. Czy możesz sprawdzić , czy ta zgoda jest uznana za wystarczającą? Oczywiście zdaję sobie sprawę z faktu, że zgody muszą być jasne i czytelne. W tego typu sytuacjach ma miejsce pewna niezręczność, gdy naukowiec jest po kilka razy proszony o potwierdzanie tego samego faktu. Niezręcznie mi takie osoby zmuszać po kikakroć do odpisana w konkretny sposób, podczas, gdy oni odzisują zwięźle.... "zgadzam się".
Oprócz tej sprawy, a może raczej w związku z tym plikiem, przyszła mi do głowy myśl, że tego typu sprawy są stałym problemem OTRS. Może więc dobrze byłoby zmontować w commons szablon, który byłby automatycznie wysyłany pod adres mailowy autora i zawierałby pełne wyjaśnienie licencji i dedykowany link który miałby kliknąć by autoryzować zgodę. Wówczas mielibyśmy załatwioną sprawę precyzji i wiarygodności. No i pozbylibyśmy się niezręczości nękania po kilkakroć autorów. Jacek555 (talk) 14:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
- Dziękuję. Muszę Ci powiedzieć, że z punktu widzenia osoby której zadowloenie życiowe rośnie po sprokurowaniu jakiegoś kompletnego artykułu na wiki z włączeniem grafiki, którą wcześniej musi wydębić od autorów, OTRS-team jawi się jako biurokratyczny twór, który ma za zadanie to zadowolenie skasować. Część zespołu czepia się spraw formy potwierdzenia, tak jak to zresztą było w przypadku mojego kretoszczura. Z Twoich wyjaśnień wynika, że są to dość indywidualne sprawy i podejście poszczególnych OTRSów może być skrajnie różne. Kilkukrotnie napotykałem na takie utrudnienia, więc zakładałem że są one jakimś uzgodnionym kanonem. Stąd pomysł autoamtu.
- Nie chodziło mi o wysyłanie potwierdzeń pod adresem importującym pliki i przysyłającym zgłoszenia na permission, ale - przy założeniu, że twarde upieranie się by autor zdjęcia jasno wykrztusił formułkę "CC-BY-SA...." - można by wysyłać do niego mailem (na adres z którego przysłał wcześniej "niejasną" zgodę) link dedykowany, po kliknięciu którego potwierdzałby przygotowaną precyzyjną formułkę. Ale skoro ortodoksyjność lub zdroworozsądkowe podejście zależy od poszczególnych OTRSów, to pewnie nie ma takiej potrzeby. Ale jak będę miał tego typu problem, to znów się zgłoszę :)) Jacek555 (talk) 16:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Zdjęcie innego autora
editCześć!
Chciałbym zapytać co muszę zrobić, jakie zgody uzyskać, żeby móc zamieścić zdjęcie autora niezwiązanego z Wikipedią. Chodzi o zdjęcie EL2. Autor w mailu do mnie wyraził zgodę na użycie jej w Wikipedii z zastrzeżeniem podania źródła i autora czyli coś jakby CC-BY-SA. Co muszę zrobić, żeby licencji zadość uczynić? Flyz1 (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
- Napisałem jeszcze raz do autora, by zgodził się na CC-BY-SA. Wcześniej nie pytałem dokładnie o CC-BY-SA, a i on nie wpisał, że na tej licencji chce udostępnić. Napisał jedynie, by podać źródło pliku i autora. Mimo wszystko poczekam na potwierdzenie CC-BY-SA. Dzięki za pomoc z tymi licencyjnymi zawiłościami, następnym razem będę wiedział jak to wszystko załatwić :) Flyz1 (talk) 14:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Cześć. Mam prośbę o zweryfikowanie przesłanych przeze mnie plików. Zgłoszenia OTRS na Permission zostały wysłane: 2013-08-19: File:Cricetus cricetus skull 1.jpg, File:Cricetus cricetus skull 2.jpg, File:Cricetus cricetus front foot.jpg, File:Cricetus cricetus hind paw.jpg, 2013-08-20: File:C.cricetus Lublin1.jpg, File:C.cricetus Lublin2.jpg, File:C.cricetus Lublin3.jpg, File:C.cricetus Lublin4.jpg, Pozdrawiam, Jacek555 (talk) 16:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Cześć, to znów ja z prośbą o weryfikację OTRS File:Reithrodontomys_bakeri.jpeg . Miłego wieczoru :) Jacek555 (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Witam, czy ww. plik można by przenieść do Wikimedia Commons? Plik nie ma podanego autora zdjęcia, ale jest tak stary, że chyba nie powinno być problemów z licencją, (jakaś pomoc z dobrym opisem jak przenieść?), plik jest oznaczony przez robota jako kandydat do przeniesienia do Wikimedia Commons, pzdr -- C12 (talk) 08:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
- Re: User_talk:C12#Re: Grand Fleet sails dzięki za szybką odpowiedź, pozdrawiam serdecznie -- C12 (talk) 09:13, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
Party logo: File:Logo-twoj-ruch2013.png
editDear Wojciech, please, delete this file. Designer, who created this logo for party Twój Ruch, after I published file made by me self (with CorelDraw - actually version), started concerns about it. Now he declared, he and party Twój Ruch does not wish, this logo remains in public domain. Please, do it for me to avoid further problems, court trials included! Thank you in advance for help! Zboralski (talk) 23:56, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Cześć Wpedzich,
Wiem, że może się to wydawać dziwne, ale ten plik to nie copyvio. Musiałeś nie przeczytać opisu pliku, to pochodna pliku File:Microsoft Windows 1.0 pages2 3.jpg (a tu DR), jest on w domenie publicznej. Wiedziałem, że ten plik zrobi lekkie zamieszanie :) --Rezonansowy (talk) 22:47, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
editHappy Holidays! | |
G'day, just a quick greeting wishing you and your family happy holidays and all the best for 2014. And of course, a big thank you for putting a leg up by doing what you do on Commons, and helping to make it the fantastic project that it is. Greetings from a warm west coast of Aussie. russavia (talk) 01:53, 24 December 2013 (UTC) |
Antekbojar
editKilka moich nominacji do usunięcia cofnięto. Pan Antek Bojar ładuje zdjęcia pojedyńczych domów i piszę że to ulica ta a ta. Spoko jak zabytkowe, stare, wyjątkowe ale jak "dom jak każdy inny" to ile ma być tych ilustracji domów na commons? Poza tym to czyjaś prywatna posesja a w opisie pisze że to ulica? Albo to wiosna na Giszowcu a ja widzę rower i parę krzaczorów bloki. Czy to coś sensownego wnosi? Albo to Dworzec w Ustce a ja widzę przystanek i kilka autobusów nie wiadomo gdzie? Grzegorznadolski (talk) 14:41, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- No i dlaczego jeden z adminów mnie zablokował. W dodatku bez ostrzeżenia o możliwości blokady? Grzegorznadolski (talk) 17:24, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
- Dziękuję że mu tam skrobnąłeś wyjaśnienie, żeby moich działań nie brał za szkodliwe. Ten Pan powstawiał masę fajnych fotek, ale jest jednak kilka których lepiej się pozbyć. Mniejsza o blokadę, ale powiedz co zrobić z tymi fotami domów z opisem ulica ta a ta. Przepraszam za słowa, ale do cholery co mnie obchodzi pojedyńcza chałupa w mieście iks na ulicy iks. Nie każda ulica ma hasło na wiki. A ta co by miała przecież nie będę ją ilustrował wizerunkiem prywatnego domu kogoś kto być nie życzyłby sobie tego. Uważam, że te foty prywatnych domów które każdy może odnaleźć w realu (znamy miasto i ulicę) to pewien problem. Co z tym zrobić? Grzegorznadolski (talk) 12:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Albo to wyraźnie widoczne tablice rejestracyjne? Moim zdaniem takie grafiki naruszają prawo do prywatności, ale nie wiem kto i jak miałby to posprzątać? Uważam że wkład tego Pana trzeba solidnie przetrzepać. Powtorzę dodał dużo wartościowych grafik, ale kilka z nich moim zdaniem nie powinno być na commons. Grzegorznadolski (talk) 13:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
- Dziękuję że mu tam skrobnąłeś wyjaśnienie, żeby moich działań nie brał za szkodliwe. Ten Pan powstawiał masę fajnych fotek, ale jest jednak kilka których lepiej się pozbyć. Mniejsza o blokadę, ale powiedz co zrobić z tymi fotami domów z opisem ulica ta a ta. Przepraszam za słowa, ale do cholery co mnie obchodzi pojedyńcza chałupa w mieście iks na ulicy iks. Nie każda ulica ma hasło na wiki. A ta co by miała przecież nie będę ją ilustrował wizerunkiem prywatnego domu kogoś kto być nie życzyłby sobie tego. Uważam, że te foty prywatnych domów które każdy może odnaleźć w realu (znamy miasto i ulicę) to pewien problem. Co z tym zrobić? Grzegorznadolski (talk) 12:38, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi, you deleted a lot of files uploaded by this user, even if they were too simple to be eligible for copyright and were in use. Some of them had just been kept after a copyvio nomination, others even after a regular DR (as indicated at the talk pages). Please don't do that. If you disagree with the decision of a colleague, please explain why, in a regular DR. Jcb (talk) 01:00, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- I've renominated a number of these for deletion. Jcb, please familiarize yourself with COM:DM and COM:TOO. As has been decided in DR over and over again, gradients and complex shapes are not pd-shape/pd-ineligible. -FASTILY 01:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Fastily, I found File:Puls 3.png unclear. That's why I started a DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Puls 3.png, which you closed as kept. Jcb (talk) 01:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- Correct, I closed it as keep because there was no consensus to delete the file. As you hopefully have learned from being de-admined, it is the duty of the closing admin to read the consensus of a DR (where there are no glaring copyright issues) without introducing his or her own opinion into the mix. Unless you've changed your mind about File:Puls 3.png, it's pretty obvious from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Puls 3.png that you have arbitrarily, and egregiously assigned pd-shape status to said file. That said, please don't put words in my mouth, and assume that my closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Puls 3.png is an accurate representation of my opinion on this matter. It's not. -FASTILY 09:40, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Fastily, I found File:Puls 3.png unclear. That's why I started a DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Puls 3.png, which you closed as kept. Jcb (talk) 01:30, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Wojtku, mam prośbę o weryfikację u autora (lee Thompson?) jego zdjęcia file:Holy Sepulchre-stone.JPG opisanego jako "Holy Sepulchre". Tę samą sugestię zawiera nazwa pliku. Obie nazwy sugerują, że jest to rzekomo "Grób święty", czyli jak można rozumieć - tzw kokh (czyli skalna półka grobowa) z wnętrza grobowca w bazylice Grobu Świętego w Jerozolimie. Otóż miejsce pochówku Jezusa jest przykryte marmurową płytą, która nie była zdejmowana co najmniej do 1810 roku i nikt nie mógł zrobić zdjęcia wnętrza pod płytą w 2012 roku. Przygotowują w tej chwili dość solidną przebudowę artykułu na temat bazyliki Grobu Świętego i wiem, że takie zdjęcie jest niemożliwe do uzyskania. Być może jest tylko przykładowy grób typu kokh z takiego okresu, albo grobowiec w kaplicy Syryjczyków tej bazyliki (który jest przypisywany biblijnemu Józefowi z Arymatei). Na pewno nie jest to "Holy Sepulchre". Prosiłem o wyjaśnienie usera (i admina) Matanya, który wstawił zdjęcie rok temu: [4], ale jak widzisz nie jest w stanie odpowiedzieć. Trzeba by pewnie sięgnąć w OTRS do kontaktu z autorem. Jacek555 (talk) 10:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
editThe Original Barnstar | |
Before the entry of the Chinese New Year, I bestow upon thee this Star of Hope. Cheers. Ramon FVelasquez (talk) 02:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC) |
Cześć, w marcu 2012 zostało usunięte zdjęcie (pomagałeś mi w sprawach licencyjnych). Szczerze mówiąc nie wiem dlaczego, ponieważ wówczas wszystko zostało poprawione zgodnie z twoimi sugestiami (a przynajmniej tak to pamietam). Chcę ponownie dodać to samo zdjęcie, ale cały czas mam komunikat, że takie zdjęcie zostało "moved or deleted". Próba załadowania zdjęcia pod inną nazwą też kończy się niepowodzenie. Mógłbyś mi wytłumaczyć dlaczego tak się dzieje i pomóc w załadowaniu zdjęcia do istniejącego hasła? Pozdrawiam, --Marzej (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Tauron_Basket_Liga_-_donated_photos
editHello, Wojciech Pędzich. You have new messages at Jarekt#Tauron_Basket_Liga_-_donated_photos's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
De-adminship warning
editDear Wojciech Pędzich, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 20:01, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Whoops… sorry about that! odder (talk) 20:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Sunreef Shipyard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Hej! Fotka wycięta z tego, ale nie mam siły ani ochoty się przebijać przez te wszystkie licencje, których szczęśliwie nie znam :) Potrzebowałem na SG na pl wiki, pewnie trzeba tę przyciętą fotkę jakoś podpiąć do dużej... Wybacz zamieszanie i działanie wbrew zwyczajom :) Pzdr! Nedops (talk) 22:30, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
- Dzięki :) Nedops (talk) 07:43, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- Zerknij jeszcze proszę na File:Kazan 2015 - Hosszú Katinka cropped.jpg (sytuacja jak wyżej, coś tam wypełniłem śladowo...). Nedops (talk) 18:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Tym razem jeszcze inaczej wyszło :/ File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-77364-0002, Czepanski, Martsch 2.jpg Nedops (talk) 18:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Zerknij jeszcze proszę na File:Kazan 2015 - Hosszú Katinka cropped.jpg (sytuacja jak wyżej, coś tam wypełniłem śladowo...). Nedops (talk) 18:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Living people
editHi Wojcech, I saw you uploaded few photos, which have a very interesting motiv an are very nice. But perhaps it would be nice, if you can add on photo with living peoples the template {{personality right}} so the peoples are a little bit protected --ragrds from AT K@rl (talk) 21:54, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Tagging copyvios
editHi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Could you please fix your requests? Thanks, Yann (talk) 12:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Sądząc po nazwach i opisach zdjęć, które załadowałeś, na trzeci dzień konferencji przenieśliście się do Lublina, czemu mnie nie uprzedziliście, dołączyłabym do was... :D Salicyna (talk) 05:40, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Konferencja Wikimedia Polska 2018 - 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
editDear Wojciech Pędzich,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Ktoś się tutaj nieładnie bawi
edit[5]. Pzdr! Nedops (talk) 09:25, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers
editA community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect
user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect
user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.
edit
Dear Wojciech Pędzich,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 12:33, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Wojciech, a deletion-request has been filed for this image. But it is in use on 3 :pl pages. Personally, I wonder why this image hasn't been deleted earlier, as to me it looks sort of insulting and a personality-rights violation. What is your opinion? --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hello @Túrelio: and sorry for replying with a delay. This was a sort of a joke among many Polish Wikipedians at the time - many of us had our photos altered for a humorous "Wikipedians' self-potrait" page. I did not mind at the time, although now the wiki-mood and permissibility of certain things in terms of personal image are somewhat different. So, I am OK with having the image removed. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 08:12, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)
edit
Dear Wojciech Pędzich,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.
You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.
To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.
Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Konkurs fotograficzny Wiki Lubi Zabytki 2020 Wszystkiego najlepszego :)
editDrogi Wojtku,
piszę do Ciebie, ponieważ dzięki Twojemu zeszłorocznemu udziałowi w konkursie Wiki Lubi Zabytki Wikipedia zyskała cenne zdjęcia polskiego dziedzictwa kultury. Miło mi poinformować, że właśnie trwa kolejna edycja tego konkursu!
Zachęcam do wzięcia w nim udziału po raz kolejny – więcej informacji znajdziesz pod adresem www.zabytki.wikimedia.pl. Czekamy na Twoje fotografie do 30 września :)
Przy okazji wiem, że dzisiaj są Twoje urodziny - życzę Ci wszystkiego najlepszego :)
Pozdrawiam Cię serdecznie - Paulina Studniczka (WMPL) (talk) 09:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Problem with your custom signature
editYour account has an invalid custom signature set in the account preferences.
A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software. You can see your custom signature settings at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal-signature. You can check your signature at https://signatures.toolforge.org
There are multiple possible errors. This message is being sent to people who have the "Mismatch between link and username" error.
The problem: Your signature links to a different user account. This often happens when you set a custom signature and then change your username.
The solutions: There are two ways to fix this problem. You can reset your signature to the default, or you can modify your signature.
- Modify your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences. (You need to do this step on the wiki where the error is, which is probably the one where you're reading this message.)
- Look in the Signature: text box for your custom signature code. This contains the name of an account, but it's not your account. It's probably the name of another account that you used.
- Change the wrong account name to your current account name.
- If you have more than one account, and you are trying to link to the other account, then change at least one of the links to your current account name. For example, change
[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]])
to:[[User:Username2|Username2]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]])
(one link to the current account's userpage, and one link to your other account's talk page), or to[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Username2|contributions]])
(two links to your other account and one link to[[Special:Contributions]]
for your current account).
- If you have more than one account, and you are trying to link to the other account, then change at least one of the links to your current account name. For example, change
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
After you have done this, the error will be fixed. If the error is not fixed, then clicking the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page will produce an error.
If you need help, please read mw:Special:MyLanguage/New requirements for user signatures/Help. Thank you. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)
Problem with your custom signature
editYour account has an invalid custom signature set in the account preferences.
A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software. You can see your custom signature settings at Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-personal-signature. You can check your signature at https://signatures.toolforge.org
There are multiple possible errors. This message is being sent to people who have the "Mismatch between link and username" error.
The problem: Your signature links to a different user account. This often happens when you set a custom signature and then change your username.
The solutions: There are two ways to fix this problem. You can reset your signature to the default, or you can modify your signature.
- Modify your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences. (You need to do this step on the wiki where the error is, which is probably the one where you're reading this message.)
- Look in the Signature: text box for your custom signature code. This contains the name of an account, but it's not your account. It's probably the name of another account that you used.
- Change the wrong account name to your current account name.
- If you have more than one account, and you are trying to link to the other account, then change at least one of the links to your current account name. For example, change
[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]])
to:[[User:Username2|Username2]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]])
(one link to the current account's userpage, and one link to your other account's talk page), or to[[User:Username|Username]] ([[User talk:Username|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Username2|contributions]])
(two links to your other account and one link to[[Special:Contributions]]
for your current account).
- If you have more than one account, and you are trying to link to the other account, then change at least one of the links to your current account name. For example, change
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
After you have done this, the error will be fixed. If the error is not fixed, then clicking the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page will produce an error.
If you need help, please read mw:Special:MyLanguage/New requirements for user signatures/Help. Thank you. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)
Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started
editDear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015, Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.
If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".
If you had already uploaded a file this year, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--06:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023
editDear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
in preparation of the 2023 board election of our group, we invite you to take a look at the following page:
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023
and provide feedback.
The timeline for the 2023 election will be
- September 15 – September 30: Applications for the election committee
- October 1 – October 9: Vote for election committee (ideally comprised of three members)
- October 10: Election committee starts work
- October 20 – November 9: Nomination phase for candidacies
- November 10 – December 10: Elections
- December 15: Results announced
In the first step we ask you to be part of the election committe. Please add your name on the Election Page.
We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.
All the best
Commons Photographers User Group: Board Elections 2023 - Nomination Phase
editDear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
the 2023 board election of our group is run at
Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2023.
The next steps in the timeline for the 2023 election are
- October 20 – November 16: Nomination phase for candidacies
- November 17 – December 10: Elections
- December 16: Results announced
If you are interested in being a member of the board, please nominate yourself on the Election Page.
We are very much looking forward to hearing from you. Please use this talk page for your thoughts.
All the best
Wiki Science Competition 2023
editDear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.
If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.
If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.
If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.
Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.
Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list
Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023
Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--20:17, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Nintendo 64 w zasobach muzeum Gry i Komputery Minionej Ery we Wrocławiu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Flickypedia soft launch and a huge thank you
editDear fellow Commons photographer,
I hope this message finds you well. As you might already know, the Flickr Foundation has been busy creating a new Flickr-to-Commons bridge (“Flickypedia”) this year. After a successful demo at the GLAM Wiki Conference in Montevideo, the Flickr Foundation team is now inviting all members of the Commons Photographers User Group to be the first to review their alpha, reporting any technical issues or other feedback via the Flickypedia project talk page.
At the same time, this message is an opportunity for me to thank you for your trust and support over the past couple of years. Since 2017, we've grown into being one of the largest user groups in the Wikimedia universe. I've tremendously enjoyed interacting with all of our members when it came to joint photowalks at Wikimanias, virtual Zoom meetings where we covered a wide variety of photography topics, as well as our annual “Most memorable shot of the year”, among many other events. As I'm not running for an official position in our current board election, this will be my last message on behalf of the user group to you. Thanks for all the happy moments we shared together over the years! I hope you'll continue creating free images for the millions of people we serve through Wikipedia and Commons.
All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:36, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
Wesołych Świąt!
editWesołych Świąt i zdrowego, szczęśliwego Nowego Roku 2024! |
Cześć! Twój wniosek o wikigrant został przyjęty. Pstrykaj, wgrywaj i umieszczaj! Powodzenia! Wiktoryn (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Deadline Approaching for Most Memorable Shot Submission!
editHello Wojciech Pędzich !,
Just a quick reminder that the deadline for submitting your most memorable shot of 2023 is swiftly approaching! As tradition holds, since 2018, we've been sharing our favorite captures from the past year with each other. This year marks the sixth iteration of our beloved "Most Memorable Shot" tradition, and we're excited to see what everyone has to share.
Whether you're a member of the Commons Photographers User Group or not, you're warmly invited to participate. Your unique perspective adds to the richness of our community, and we'd love to see the world through your lens.
So, if you haven't already, take a moment to pick out your most cherished picture of 2023 and share it with us on the designated page. The deadline is February 29th, so don't let time slip away!
Let's keep this wonderful tradition alive and celebrate the beauty and diversity of our collective experiences through photography.
Looking forward to seeing your memorable shots!
Best regards,
Cześć! Komisja Wikigrantów postanowiła przyznać Ci dofinansowanie. Udanego wyjazdu. Tony świetnych zdjęć :). Pozdrawiam, Wiktoryn (talk) 21:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Commons photographers: next virtual meeting on April 13, 2024
editDear member of the Commons Photographers User Group,
I'm inviting you to our next virtual meeting on Saturday, April 13, 2024 at 9.00 UTC ( start time in your timezone (via zoneStamp!) (expected duration for 2 hrs). The primary agenda of this gathering will revolve around discussions regarding the Movement Charter. Your valuable input and participation in these discussions would be highly appreciated. If you're interested in attending, please sign up on this page: Virtual Meeting on April 13, 2024.
I hope you're having a great time taking photos and I'm looking forward to seeing you.
All the best, -- Suyash Dwivedi (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Pytanie
editHej, niesamowite zdjęcie z Eurowizji 2024ǃ Masz możę zdjęcia Fahree? Kwintesencjax (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hej. Będę mieć komplet z półfinałów i finału. Ściślej z prób generalnych bo akredytowane media mogą wtedy robić zdjęcia. Pozdrowienia z drugiej próby generalnej, zaraz zaczynam fotografowanie. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 13:43, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Alyona Alyona and Jerry Heil, final, Eurovision 2024
editHi! Thanks for the wonderful photos from Eurovision 2024. Can I ask what these photos are from since the final just started and these photos are from long before it started. A dress rehearsal for the final? - Yupik (talk) 19:22, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Accredited media are allowed to photograph the first dress rehearsal for semi-finals and the final. So yes, these are from the dress rehearsal of the final performance, yesterday afternoon. Working on all the others, and as you will see they are always a day before their respective (semi)final. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 19:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the answer! I was captioning the photo in a Wikipedia article, but was unsure since the title didn't say it was from the dress rehearsal. Now I can fix it :) Can't wait to see the rest of the photos! - Yupik (talk) 12:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Cześć! Komisja Wikigrantów przyznała dofinansowanie na przedłużenie licencji. Przyjemności z pracy z wybranym pakietem :). I kolejnych tysięcy świetnych zdjęć :). Pozdrawiam, Wiktoryn (talk) 09:46, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 08.jpg
editCopyright status: File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 08.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 08.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 01.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 09.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 02.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 10.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 03.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 11.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 04.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 12.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 05.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 13.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 06.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 14.jpg
- File:Megara, Eurovision 2024, 2nd semi-final rehearsal 07.jpg
This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:18, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
Wesołych Świąt!
editWesołych Świąt i zdrowego, szczęśliwego Nowego Roku 2025! |