Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

edit

Reversion of File:Chicago Board Of Trade Building.jpg

edit

Hi,

Thank you for your change to File:Chicago Board Of Trade Building.jpg. However, I've reverted this to the version that had been previously assessed as a "Quality Image".

The guidelines note that new versions should not be uploaded (except for minor, non-controversial changes by the creator) on "Files that have been awarded a special status like Commons Featured Picture, Commons Quality Image, or similar status on another Wikimedia project."

Please upload the altered version under a new filename if you want to keep it.

Thanks,

Ubcule (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

On second thoughts, no need to re-upload this yourself, I have uploaded the altered version here. All the best, Ubcule (talk) 14:59, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apple Mac Mini (March 2009) 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:20, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Nikon d4x 04082009.jpg

edit
 
File:Nikon d4x 04082009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply