Velopilger

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Velopilger!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

File:Werden2.jpg

Hallo Velopilger, da ich hierzu rund 50 weitere Fotos hochladen will, habe ich das Durcheinander im Category:Kloster Werden schon mal etwas aufgeräumt. Mit diesem einen Bild komme ich allerdings nicht weiter. Wo ist dieses Fresco? In der Basilika? Die Farbe ist mir auch nicht geheuer, ist das wirklich so orange? Ich kann mich nicht erinnern, sowas im Kloster gesehen zu haben. Gruß -- Ies (talk) 06:15, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Hallo les! Fresko ist in der Basilika. In Vorhalle. Ja, orange, aber nicht so. --Velopilger (talk) 17:00, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Denis Menschov.jpg

File:Denis Menschov.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

--TarzanASG (talk) 01:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Доброе утро. Я, собственно говоря в сомнении насчёт этого файла. С одной стороны я его снял фотоаппаратом с экрана телевизора. То есть это как бы моя фоторабота. Это копирайт? А если я сделаю этот файл, включив в него и сам телевизор? это антиправно? Прошу растолковать. С уважением, --Velopilger (talk) 05:11, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Waldklassenzimmer22.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Waldklassenzimmer22.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

--Dodo (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Waldklassenzimmer16.jpg

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Waldklassenzimmer16.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

--Dodo (talk) 13:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Velopilger!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 07:02, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Sobytie.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2009.
• Image:Xanten Tempel2.jpg was uncategorized on 3 October 2009.
• Image:Kloster Marienborn.jpg was uncategorized on 8 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 23:07, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Ufimskaya.jpg

Не грузите, пожалуйста, такие вещи, если вы не сфотографировали их сами: икона это pd-art, а вот оклад иконы - 3d объект и его фото принадлежит автору, а не кому угодно. Боюсь, начнут удалять иконы в окладах, и труд ваш пропадет зря. --Shakko (talk) 19:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Хорошо. Да уже я практически прекратил грузить то, что не фотографирую. Спасибо за предупреждение. С уважением, --Velopilger (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Soest-Dom-IMG 5254-Patroklus.png

Bitte die Falschschreibung in Deiner neuen Cat korrigieren. mfg --Mbdortmund (talk) 23:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Velopilger, wär schön, wenn du bei File:St. Elisabeth Bergkamen 3.jpg noch eine Information über den Bildhauer und das Entstehungsdatum (Jahr) hinzufügen könntest. --Túrelio (talk) 11:00, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Jetzt neu Information.--Velopilger (talk) 19:34, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Weststrasse Benrath Karte.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hinweis

[1] Die Bilder in diesem Ordner sind nicht alle aus 2011. In diesem Fall kannst du die neuen Bilder je mit "2011 in Benrath" kategorisieren, da du ja bereits den Ordner angelegt hast. Gruß, --BlackIceNRW (talk) 06:51, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

• http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:2011_in_BenrathVielen Dank, alles ist fertig.--Velopilger (talk) 11:42, 7 January 2011 (UTC)

Tipp zum Kategorisieren

Hallo Velopilger. Um mir und anderen zeitaufwändige Korrektur-Arbeiten bezüglich deiner Fotos zu ersparen, ein Tipp: Wenn du so umfangreiche Fotoserien, wie die vom Aachener Platz, hochlädst, dann solltest du einen eigenen Ordner - möglichst mit Jahresangabe - anlegen. Das habe ich hier nachgeholt. Denn sonst lassen sich die übrigen Fotos in den Hauptordnern (in diesem Fall der Ordner "Aachener Platz (Düsseldorf)") für den Suchenden nur sehr schwer auffinden. Zudem erspart es dir Arbeit, wenn du je die einzelnen Fotos kategorisierst, da du die Anzahl der Kategorien auf ein Minimum beschränken kannst. Viel Spaß beim Fotografieren und Gruß, --BlackIceNRW (talk) 09:39, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Ähh - und bitte englischsprachige Lemmatas. --BlackIceNRW (talk) 10:09, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Hier, hier, hier und hier dasselbe. --BlackIceNRW (talk) 11:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Ohne Worte --BlackIceNRW (talk) 11:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

und nochmals ... (überflüssig und falsche Sprache) --BlackIceNRW (talk) 12:02, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Unzulässige Kategoriebezeichnungen

Hallo Velopilger, erstelle bitte keine unzulässigen Kategorien wie etwa Category:Die Buchgeschäfte in Benrath und Category:Der Handel in Benrath. Wegen des internationalen Publikums sind hier bei Commons nur Kategoriebezeichnungen in englischer Sprache zulässig. Ausnahmen bilden lediglich Eigennamen und einige wenige Dinge, für die es keine englischen Bezeichnungen gibt. Nähere Hinweise findest Du bei Commons:Categories. Auf diese Seite bist Du übrigens schon mehrfach hingewiesen worden. Berücksichtige doch bitte, was dort steht und für alle Benutzer gilt . -- Ies (talk) 18:05, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Jakobspilgrim_book.jpg

File:Jakobspilgrim_book.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RE rillke questions? 17:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Bierbörse 2011 in Benrath

Hallo Velopilger, weitere Bilder bitte dort hinein: Category:Bierbörse 2011 in Benrath. Ich war übrigens auf der 1. Hückeswagener Bierbörse. Den einen oder anderen Stand wirst Du wiedererkennen. Gruß -- Ies (talk) 16:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Hallo, Ies, Ich erkenne das wieder! Gruß --Velopilger (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Das-Forstrevier-Sued.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Das-Forstrevier-Sued.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work. If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 ■ MMXX  ^talk 18:46, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Category:Teiche

Category:Teiche has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 12:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Potupin.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Potupin.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Potupin.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Denniss (talk) 19:52, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Lambertus 1.jpg

File:Lambertus 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 12:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Januar 2017 in Düsseldorf

Hallo Velopilger, können wir uns darauf verständigen, dass wir es es bei de Kategorie 2017 in Düsseldorf belassen? So viele Bilder sind es in der Regel nicht, es gibt zudem diverse Unterkategorien nach Themen- und Sachgebieten. Wenn man sie in Monate verpackt, findet man sie kaum mehr wieder. Das wäre ganz prima! -- Kürschner (talk) 17:19, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, Kirschner, Ich liquidierte die Kategorie "Januar 2017 in Düsseldorf". Aber die übrigen Themen wenn auch bleiben, da ich denke, etwas Tausende Fotografien Düsseldof in diesem Jahr zu schaffen und es ist die strenge Ordnung nötig. Danke für das Verständnis. --Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 07:14, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Wunderbar. Alles andere sehe ich auch so. Gutes Schaffen und danke! -- Kürschner (talk) 21:25, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

???

File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg

File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Alinea (talk) 09:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I ask to specify a source from which I have copied. --84.63.172.185 10:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC) (Velopilger)/

The church of Dortmund has to send permission to the publication to what address: wash or Wikipedias?

Permission in a free form or in a certain form? Velopilger, 14:04, 5 April 2017/ Охренеть, как строго и буквоедски. А оно мне надо? За деньги работаем, или бесплатно, как я сам это много лет делаю? Чус.

File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg

File:Aljoscha, installation Dortmund 2015.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I am not an OTRS editor

Velopilger: I have deleted the email you sent me without reading it as it may contain personal information. I am not a COM:OTRS editor, and cannot read/accept what you sent. Please follow the instructions at the page COM:OTRS. Thank you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Wikimedia's fund has got all necessary permissions. The photo is kept.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:23, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Hanau (V-1007-2017).jpg

File:Hanau (V-1007-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:43, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:30, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Hanau (V-1000-2017).jpg

File:Hanau (V-1000-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Hanau (V-0999-2017).jpg

File:Hanau (V-0999-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Hanau (V-1002-2017).jpg

File:Hanau (V-1002-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.251.133.235 18:52, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

It is not the personal photo, but the report on an action of the largest official integration organization in Düsseldorf - Kin-Top. The event is held for group of teenage foreigners. Photos are planned to be used for writing of article about Kin-Top in Wikipedia and a number of articles for Wikinews. It is necessary to leave as the photo of a socially useful action.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0394).jpg

File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0394).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Till (talk) 07:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0387).jpg

File:Museum Ludwig Koln (V-0387).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Till (talk) 07:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Tour 1903 5.jpg

File:Tour 1903 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Курмухская Георгиевская церковь. Географ.jpg

Copyright status: File:Курмухская Георгиевская церковь. Географ.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Курмухская Георгиевская церковь. Географ.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:User:Velopilger-Tram

Hallo, was ist der Zweck dieser Kategorie und ihrer Unterkategorien? Wir haben bereits sinnvoller benannte Unterkategorien von Category:Tram transport by year. Tokfo (talk) 06:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Ja, Sie haben recht, Sie müssen meine Kategorien entfernen und Bilder nach Jahren und Ländern zerlegen. Entschuldigung.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 08:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

OK, werde sie zur Schnelllöschung vorschlagen. Tokfo (talk) 07:47, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Monheim am Rhein ist nicht in Düsseldorf

Hallo Velopilger, bei einigen Deiner Bilder ist die Kategorisierung falsch. Z.B. kann File:Monheim am Rhein, 14. Februar 2019. The Geographer-4.jpg nicht gleichzeitig in Category:Monheim am Rhein und Category:Februar 2019 bicycle in Düsseldorf und Category:2019 in Düsseldorf Februar sein, denn Monheim am Rhein liegt nicht in Düsseldorf.

• Was bezweckst Du mit der seltsamen Category:Februar 2019 bicycle in Düsseldorf? Es gibt keine andere Kategorie vom Typ [[:Category:Monat Jahr bicycle in Ort]]. Warum dann von Düsseldorf?
• Was bezweckst Du mit der seltsamen Category:2019 in Düsseldorf Februar? Es gibt keine andere Kategorie vom Typ [[:Category:Jahr in Ort Monat]]. Warum dann von Düsseldorf?
• Warum stellst Du "Februar" einmal nach vorne und einmal nach hinten im Kategorienamen? Und warum das deutsche Wort "Februar"? Du weißt doch, dass Kategorienamen (mit Ausnahme von Eigennamen) in englischer Sprache zu erstellen sind. Warum der Singular "bicycle"? Du weißt doch, dass Kategorienamen im Plural zu erstellen sind.

Warum also so ein nicht nachvollziehbares Kategorisierungschaos? -- Ies (talk) 16:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Denn der Radfahrer kommt aus Düsseldorf und vertritt die Düsseldorfer Radfahrer.--Алексей Потупин (старший) (talk) 16:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Герасим Болдинский. Чтец.jpg

Copyright status: File:Герасим Болдинский. Чтец.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Герасим Болдинский. Чтец.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jcb (talk) 23:39, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Template:Hilden photographs taken on navbox

I see that you created Template:Hilden photographs taken on navbox but it seems like the template itself is for photographs by year. Please recheck it. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Maerz

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Maerz has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Februar

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Februar has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:Pflanzen_und_Blumen_in_Benrath

Category:Pflanzen_und_Blumen_in_Benrath has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 20:58, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Mai

Category:2019_in_Benrath_Mai has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Category:2019_Januar_in_Benrath

Category:2019_Januar_in_Benrath has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ies (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Bilderwunsch, 2 x Garath

Hallo Velopilger, die beiden letzten Objekte habe ich vorhin verpasst. Kannst du das übernehmen?

https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Baudenkmäler_in_Garath

Schönen Tag! -- Kürschner (talk) 11:58, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Medals of Sergius of Radonezh. Reader-1.png

And also:

• File:Madals of Sergius of Radonezh. Reader-3.png
• File:Madals of Sergius of Radonezh. Reader-2.png

Yours sincerely, Maxinvestigator (talk) 12:31, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Velopilger,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Velopilger,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Velopilger,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Image corruption detected in File:20200207 Tram line "V" (Benrath-Hilden-Haan-Vohwinkel) 14.jpg

---

Hello Velopilger, it appears that the version of File:20200207 Tram line "V" (Benrath-Hilden-Haan-Vohwinkel) 14.jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-07T22:40:40Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 18:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

Name of place / Ortsname

Hi, Velopilger. Browsing your uploads it strikes me that the names you give to the files often include a streetname but not the name of city or the village the street is to be found, so I have to open the file page to find out. May I suggest that, in future uploads, you add the place name also? I think it will add to the convenience and to the quality. It's your game, of course, but I thought I'd just suggest it. Best greetings, Eissink (talk) 20:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC).

File:Edelstein. Reader.jpg

File:Edelstein. Reader.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

File:Geoclub named after Jacob Edelstein in Dusseldorf. Reader.jpg. Maxinvestigator (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:1866 The construction of the Second Jerusalem Temple.png

File:1866 The construction of the Second Jerusalem Temple.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gunnar (💬) 13:52, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Wanderung 4 Maerz 2017 Duesseldorf (V-0859-2017).jpg

File:Wanderung 4 Maerz 2017 Duesseldorf (V-0859-2017).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 19:11, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-9.jpg

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-9.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-10.png

File:2021-02-04-Dreikönigenpförtchen-Köln-10.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Marien Gnadenbild2 Neviges.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 07:32, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo1.jpg

And also:

• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo10.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo2.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo3.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo4.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo5.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo6.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo7.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo8.jpg
• File:2021-06-18-Bert-Gerresheim-Stadtmuseum-Düsseldorf-photo9.jpg

Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 12:20, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Church of St. Anthony the Great September 29, 2019. Reader-10.jpg

File:Church of St. Anthony the Great September 29, 2019. Reader-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Brianjd (talk) 01:12, 30 October 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 25.jpg

And also:

• File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 27.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 17:10, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 27.jpg

File:20200523 Pigrimage to Cologne 27.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellywa (talk) 22:50, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-11.jpg

And also:

• File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-3.jpg
• File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-5.jpg
• File:St. Maria Empfaengniskirche in Düsseldorf. The Geographer-9.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 09:25, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Bulgarian Orthodox Church of Saints Cyril and Methodius (Budapest)

Привет! Позвольте мне порекомендовать вам эту категорию. Продолжайте хорошую работу! --Sir Morosus (talk) 16:48, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Jüdischer Friedhof Velbert-Neviges

Hallo, Velopilger,

die Kategorisierung Deiner Fotos vom Jüdischen Friedhof in Neviges war nicht falsch, allerdings leicht zu übersehen, da Neviges ja zu Velbert gehört. Ich habe deshalb eine Umleitung eingerichtet. Außerdem hast Du Deine schönen Fotos gar nicht in die Liste der Baudenkmäler in Velbert verlinkt. Daher war ich davon ausgegangen, dass es vom Friedhof noch keine Commons-Fotos gibt und hatte mich im Februar, um die Lücke zu schließen, auf den gar nicht so leicht zu findenden Weg dorthin gemacht. Das war ein schöner kleiner Spaziergang (den ich sonst gar nicht unternommen hätte), allerdings hätte ich, hätte ich Deine Fotos nicht erst jetzt durch Zufall entdeckt, mindestens die Hälfte meiner Fotos gar nicht erst hochgeladen.

Daher Gratulation zu Deinen Aufnahmen verbunden mit der Bitte, sie, wenn sie Bau- oder Bodendenkmäler zeigen, doch in die Wiki-Listen einzutragen.

Gruß --Im Fokus (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für Ihre Arbeit, (Velopilger), oder Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 19:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Baumberger Straße 13 in Langenfeld

Hallo Velopilger, nur eine kleine Anmerkung zu den Kategorie-Namen in Langenfeld:

offiziell heißt der Ort ja Langenfeld (Rheinland) und das ist normalerweise kein Problem. Schwierig wird es nur, wenn der Ortsname als Klammer-Lemma benötigt wird, hauptsächlich bei den Straßennamen. So könnte es z.B. aussehen: Category:Baumberger Straße (Langenfeld (Rheinland)). So machen es Frankfurt (Oder) und Hof (Saale). Systemisch unsauber aber ist Category:Baumberger Straße (Langenfeld (Rheinland), denn da fehlt entweder eine )-Klammer oder die zweite (-Klammer ist zuviel, deshalb habe ich es in Category:Baumberger Straße (Langenfeld) geändert. Den Zusatz (Eifel) und (Middle Franconia) lassen die anderen beiden Langenfelds nämlich bei ihren paar Straßennamen auch weg. Das sind aber Käffer von 657 und 1066 Einwohnern, während unser Langenberg hier fast 60.000 Einwohner hat. Ich bin der Meinung, da kann hier wohl am ehesten der Zusatz weggelassen werden, wo er unpraktisch ist.

Und bitte daran denken: nur in der Schweiz hat man schon lange das ß abgeschafft, daher werden die Straßen dort tatsächlich Strassen geschrieben, hier aber Straßen.

Gruß --Im Fokus (talk) 14:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

ok danke, ich stimme zu. Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 17:07, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Kategorisierung

Hallo Velopilger,

kleine Erinnerung: Doppelkategorisierungen sollten vermieden werden. Wenn Du also bei einem Bild wie File:2022-08-04 Altenbau (Solingen) photo-01.jpg die Category:Solingen photographs taken on 2022-08-04 benutzt, die in der Category:August 2022 Solingen photographs steckt, welche wiederum in der Category:August 2022 in Solingen steckt, dann musst und solltest Du letztere für das Bild selbst nicht auch noch vergeben, denn die erstgenannte, die Du dem Bild zugewisen hast, impliziert die beiden anderen. Das gilt generell bei den photographs taken on-Kategorien.

Auf der anderen Seite wäre es hilfreich, wenn Du beispielsweise bei diesem Bild außer der Kategorie Altenbau noch die Straße als Kategorie und die Hausnummer dazu zumindest in der Beschreibung angeben würdest, damit man weiß, um welches Haus es sich handelt. Commons ist ja nicht dafür gedacht, hübsche Ferien-Fotos oder Schnappschüsse von seinen Hobbies online zu stellen, sondern die Bebilderung von Wikipedia-Artikeln zu ermöglichen. Dazu dient vor allem die Kategorisierung. Wie soll man bitte Deine Aufnahme eines Brandmelders finden, wenn diese nur über Aufnahmedatum und Standort-Bezirk, nicht aber über ihre allerwichtigste Eigenschaft Brandmelder kategorisiert ist? Ich habe das in diesem Falle mit der Category:Fire alarm pull stations in Germany nachgeholt. Wäre schön, wenn Du das bei Deinen Bildern in Zukunft entsprechend handhaben würdest.

Wie gesagt: hier werden möglichst funktionale Fotos mit einer möglichst funktionalen Einordnung erwartet. Deinen Kategorien kann ich meistens nur entnehmen, an welchem Tag Du in welchem Ortsteil fotografiert hast, aber selten, welche Objekte Du fotografiert hast. Das aber ist wesentlich: WAS hast Du denn da fotografiert? Haus? Baum? Auto? Kann doch nicht so schwer sein zu begreifen. Es geht ja in einer ganzen Menge von Abschnitten hier um Deine Kategorisierungen. Ich verstehe nicht, wieso jemand, der durchaus einen intelligenten Eindruck macht, sich trotz der Kritik so wenig zu bemühen scheint, die Kriterien dieses Portals anständig zu erfüllen. Verzeih meine offenen Worte, musste mal sein. Gruß Im Fokus (talk) 22:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Kritik, ich werde sie berücksichtigen, wenn ich mich wieder an der Arbeit von Wikipedia beteilige. Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 11:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Ahe (Halver)

Hallo Velopilger,

danke für Deine Bilder von Ahe in Halver. Bis heute fehlten dem Artikel jegliche Bildinformationen über Gebäude in der Hofschaft. Gruß --Asio 19:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Медаль Спас Нерукотворный. Чтец.png
• File:Медаль Далмата Исетского. Чтец-1.jpg
• File:Медаль Далмата Исетского. Чтец-2.jpg
• File:Медаль Далмата Исетского. Чтец-3.jpg

Yours sincerely, Xunks (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-13.jpg

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Im Fokus (talk) 23:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-12.jpg

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Im Fokus (talk) 23:36, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-11.jpg

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Im Fokus (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-10.jpg

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Im Fokus (talk) 23:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-09.jpg

File:2022-07-30 Pilgrimage to Remagen foto-09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Im Fokus (talk) 23:38, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Löschungen in der Kategorie Russian Orthodox pilgrimage to Remagen

Hallo Velopilger,

bei den Bildbeschreibungen der Dateien in der oben genannten Kategorie verlegst Du die Stadt Remagen nach Nordrhein-Westfalen, obwohl sie in Rheinland-Pfalz liegt. Dann schreibst Du von orthodoxen Heiligtümern, obwohl es Heiligtümer der katholischen Kirche sind. Bitte diese massiven Fehler beheben!

Bei Bild 1 habe ich es schon getan, außerdem bei den drei Aufnahmen des Rheins. Dort habe ich zudem die entsprechenden Rheinblick-Kategorien zugeordnet sowie bei allen Innenaufnahmen die Kategorie Interior of Apollinariskirche.

Da wir uns hier nicht bei Facebook befinden, haben Fotos von Privatpersonen hier nichts zu suchen! Ich habe deshalb fünf Löschanträge gestellt, wie Du an den vorangehenden Abschnitten sehen kannst.

Davon unabhängig ist diese Aufnahme sowieso fotografischer Schrott! Alle vier Personen im Vordergrund schauen zu Boden, dem Jungen wird vom Sonnenschirm das Gesicht zerschnitten, die Dame rechts fuchtelt sich mit der Hand vor dem Gesicht herum: so will doch niemand gezeigt werden. So ein Foto hättest Du schon aus Gründen der Höflichkeit gar nicht hochladen dürfen. Bitte beim nächsten Mal auch auf ein Mindestmaß an fotografischer Qualität achten (Leider sind da eine ganze Menge User sehr nachlässig).

Gruß Im Fokus (talk) 01:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo, Im Fokus!

Ich freue mich sehr, dass Sie sich für die russisch-orthodoxe Wallfahrt interessieren, auch wenn Sie offensichtlich kein sehr religiöser Mensch sind. Im Allgemeinen bin ich froh. Glückwünsche annehmen. Was das Land Rheinland-Pfalz betrifft, so ist dies absolut korrekt, anscheinend habe ich einfach automatisch unser Land, unser Bundesland - Nordrhein-Westfalen eingestellt. Bitte akzeptieren Sie meine aufrichtige Entschuldigung. Es war nur ein Tippfehler. Aber was die Wallfahrt angeht ... Dies ist wirklich eine Wallfahrt der russisch-orthodoxen Kirche, da der Heilige Hieromartyr Apollinaris seit jeher der offizielle Heilige der russisch-orthodoxen Kirche und der katholischen Kirche als einer der Zweige der christlichen Kirchen ist , kann sich nicht das Recht anmaßen, den heiligen Apollinaris von Ravensky ausschließlich als seinen eigenen Heiligen zu betrachten, und seine in Remagen aufbewahrten Reliquien sind uns heilig. Er ist ein gewöhnlicher Heiliger. Interessant an dieser Pilgerreise ist auch, dass fast alle Teilnehmer orthodoxe Flüchtlinge aus der Ukraine waren, die derzeit (vorübergehend?) Gemeindemitglieder der Russisch-Orthodoxen Kirche in Köln sind, wo ich offizieller Lektor bin, aber hauptsächlich unentgeltlich arbeite. Wir wurden in diesen wenigen Monaten sehr gute Freunde und ich (mit einem ukrainischen Pass) als langjähriger Anwohner (fast 20 Jahre alt) nehme sie als kostenlosen Führer zu allen lokalen orthodoxen Schreinen mit, das heißt zu jenen Schreinen, die entstand vor der Kirchenteilung 1054 . So war und bleibt unsere Wallfahrt nach Remagen eine wahre Wallfahrt der Russisch-Orthodoxen Kirche. Wir betreiben keine Politik und betrachten das Himmelreich als unsere wahre Heimat, wo es keine Russen, Ukrainer, Deutschen usw. gibt, sondern nur Brüder und Schwestern in Christus.

И ещё. Я совершенно спокойно отнесусь к тому факту, если фотографии будут удалены. Без проблем. Всем низкий христианский поклон и пожелания крепкого здоровья, мира и... стать святыми! Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Hallo, Herr Potupin,

da Sie anscheinend besonderen Wert darauf legen, sich zu siezen, werde ich dies hier auch tun.

Wie Sie zu Ihrem Urteil gelangten, ich sei offensichtlich kein sehr religiöser Mensch, müssten Sie schon genauer darlegen. Zumindest wenn man das "sehr" weglässt, stimmt es definitiv nicht.

Was zudem meine Religiosität mit meiner Kritik an Ihrer Beschreibung Ihrer Fotos zu tun haben sollte, ist logisch ebenfalls nicht erkennbar.

Diese Kritik hätte genauso zutreffend ein Atheist wie ein Priester vorbringen können.

Obwohl Ihr Deutsch hervorragend zu sein scheint, haben sich in Ihren obigen Text einige unerklärliche Patzer eingeschlichen. Worüber sind Sie im Allgemeinen froh? Welche Glückwünsche sollen von wem angenommen werden? "Anwohner" statt Einwohner, fast 20 Jahre "alt" statt 20 Jahre (lang), "entstand" statt des Plurals entstanden. Der Satz über die katholische Kirche ist von der Satzstruktur her völlig entgleist. Ich mache Ihnen das nicht zum Vorwurf, sondern bin unsicher, ob Sie nicht eine Übersetzungs-App verwendet haben, weil Ihr Deutsch vielleicht doch nicht ganz so gut ist. Das könnte auch erklären, dass Sie abschließend ins Russische gewechselt sind. Nur mit Hilfe einer Übersetzungs-App weiß ich jetzt, dass Sie die Löschungen akzeptieren. Da es hier um Fotos aus Deutschland geht, bleiben Sie bitte beim nächsten Mal beim Deutschen oder verwenden Sie die für dieses Portal gültige Standardsprache Englisch. Dies ist auch eine Frage der Höflichkeit und Sie sind doch ansonsten ein sehr höflicher Mensch.

Vielleicht wissen Sie, dass die Bezeichnung katholisch der römischen Kirche aus dem Altgriechischen stammt und "das Ganze betreffend", "allumfassend" bedeutet, weshalb ich als Katholik Ihrer Bewertung als "einer der Zweige" der christlichen Kirche energisch widersprechen muss. Sie ist der Stamm, von dem sich dann die anderen chistlichen Kirchen wie die Anglikaner, Lutheraner, Calvinisten etc. abgespalten haben, und zuvor schon die Orthodoxen beim Großen Schisma von 1054. Darüber hinaus ist die Katholische Kirche etwa doppelt so alt und hat fast zehnmal so viele Mitglieder wie die Russische Orthodoxe Kirche. Soviel zur Klarstellung bezüglich Ihrer Zweige-Theorie.

Natürlich ist es Ihnen sowie der ganzen russisch-orthodoxen Kirche unbenommen, den Heiligen Apollinaris als Heiligen auch Ihrer Kirche zu verehren. Selbst die Lutheraner verehren -natürlich auf andere Weise als Sie- einige herausgehobene Heilige wie z. B. den Heiligen Petrus, dessen Gebeine sich bekanntlich im Vatikan befinden, als Glaubenszeugen. Wenn Sie nun mit einer Schar russisch-orthodoxer Gläubigen eine Pilgerfahrt zum Heiligen Apollinaris unternehmen, kann man das als eine russisch-orthodoxe Wallfahrt bezeichnen. Die Schreine mit den verehrten Reliquien werden deshalb aber nicht zu orthodoxen Heiligtümern! Wo kämen wir da denn hin! Verstehen Sie diese Differenzierung?

Hätten Sie die Wikipedia genutzt und sich mal den Artikel Apollinariskirche zu Gemüte geführt, hätten Sie erfahren, dass der Schrein des Heiligen Apollinaris vermutlich erst im 14. Jahrhundert errichtet wurde. Wie könnte es auch anders sein, wenn der Heilige erst im späten 13. Jahrhundert aus Ravenna transloziert wurde. Also nichts da mit "vor 1054" entstanden!

Jedenfalls erachte ich es als unglaubliche Tollheit, alle vor dem Schisma entstandenen Schreine zu lokalen "orthodoxen" Schreinen zu erklären! Sie sind und bleiben selbstverständlich Schreine der römisch-katholischen Kirche, wenn sie in einer solchen stehen.

Sie mögen ein unpolitischer Mensch sein, die Russische Orthodoxe Kirche ist es zumindest an Ihrer Spitze für alle Welt offensichtlich nicht! Patriarch Kyrill hat sich in dem verbrecherischen Angriffskrieg Russlands gegen die Ukraine auf die Seite des mörderischen russischen Regimes geschlagen. Verzeihen Sie mir, wenn ich daher Parallelen zum russischen Vorgehen in den völkerrechtswidrig besetzten ukrainischen Gebieten ziehe, die nach russischer Lesart quasi über Nacht russisch geworden waren. Jemandem wie diesem Patriarchen wäre glatt zuzutrauen, dass er diese lokalen "orthodoxen" Schreine ganz unvermittelt nach Russland "repatriieren" ließe, wenn er es denn könnte.

Ihnen unterstelle ich explizit solche bösen Absichten nicht. Aber Ihre unhaltbaren Aussagen zu lokalen orthodoxen Heiligtümern können so nicht stehen bleiben. Sie sind sowohl theologisch wie juristisch unhaltbar. Ich habe daher die Beschreibung zu "russisch-orthodoxe Wallfahrt zur Kopfreliquie des heiligen Apollinaris in der Apollinariskirche zu Remagen" geändert. Die Formulierungen "Orthodoxe Wallfahrt zu den Heiligtümern der Düsseldorfer Altstadt" und "Orthodoxe Wallfahrt zum Haupt der rechtschaffenen Anna in der Stadt Düren" sind o.k. "Wallfahrt zu den orthodoxen Heiligtümern der deutschen Stadt Aachen" stimmt für die Fotos aus der orthodoxen Kirche St. Michael. Für die drei Bilder aus dem Aachener Rathaus natürlich nicht, deshalb habe ich es auch da geändert. Leider fehl(t)en überall die Kategorien der entsprechenden Gebäude

Ihren weiteren Pilgerfahrten wünsche ich alles Gute. Nur bitte keine falschen oder missverständlichen Beschreibungen mehr.

--Im Fokus (talk) 06:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

File:2022-07-09 Pilgrimage to Aachen foto-1.jpg

File:2022-07-09 Pilgrimage to Aachen foto-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Im Fokus (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Steinhauerpfad-Skulpturen

Hallo Velopilger, könntest du bitte noch die Namen der Urheber (Bildhauer) der von dir fotografierten Skulpturen File:Steinhauerpfad Lindlar photo-01.jpg, File:2022-08-11 Steinhauerpfad photo-15.jpg, File:Steinhauerpfad Lindlar photo-05.jpg, File:2022-08-11 Steinhauerpfad photo-16.jpg, File:2022-08-11 Steinhauerpfad photo-01.jpg und File:2022-08-11 Steinhauerpfad photo-14.jpg zur Beschreibung hinzufügen. --Túrelio (talk) 20:13, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

• Gute Zeit, Kollege, leider wird in den mir vorliegenden Informationsquellen nichts über die Urheber der Skulpturen gesagt. Und ich stimme zu, dass es nicht sehr gut ist. Gesundheit!Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 20:44, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Lev Kazarnowsky (4).jpg

File:Lev Kazarnowsky (4).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leokand (talk) 06:03, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Obrutschev-Edelschtein.jpg

Copyright status: File:Obrutschev-Edelschtein.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Obrutschev-Edelschtein.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Please delete, file uploaded by mistake. Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Duesseldorfer Kirchen 1 (Book).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Duesseldorfer Kirchen 1 (Book).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Duesseldorfer Kirchen 1 (Book).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Raymond (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Duesseldorfer Kirchen 2 (Book).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Duesseldorfer Kirchen 2 (Book).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Duesseldorfer Kirchen 2 (Book).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Raymond (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Bitte, lieber Wikimedia Commons-Administrator. Löschen, kein Problem. Алексей Потупин дипломированный географ 1974 (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Neuer Ansatz für Jahreskategorien

Hallo Velopilger! Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass du kürzlich neue Vorlagen für Jahreskategorien angelegt hast. Ich möchte dich in diesem Zusammenhang mal auf diese Diskussion verweisen und würde mich auch über deine Rückmeldung dazu freuen. Viele Grüße --Reinhard Müller (talk) 22:51, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Category:Aalshokker (Düsseldorf)

Category:Aalshokker (Düsseldorf) is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

English · español · français

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with either:

{{SD|C2}} ("unuseful empty category") if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available

{{SD|C1}} ("improperly named category") if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused (e.g. typos).

"C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion. You could also use of the following:

{{badname|current category name}}

{{speedy|empty, misspelled category name}}

The above templates (SD, speedy, Badname) expand to full speedy deletion requests.

In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page. Blanked categories end up on Special:UncategorizedCategories, which is largely handled by non-admins who cannot delete the categories in question.

Thank you. (This is a standardized talk page message)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

---

Prototyperspective (talk) 16:52, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Warning

Hi Velopilger. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request: omitting reason and transclusion and including a delete tag on the subpage. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion or Nominate category for discussion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar provided by the AjaxQuickDelete gadget per COM:DR#Starting requests and COM:CFD#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy or the "By hand" portion of COM:CFD#Starting requests, normally collapsed), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people. Warning: such edits are not tolerated and have led to account blocks, as "We cannot work here with people who are not willing to follow our procedures, in particular for deletion requests."   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 17:53, 15 October 2024 (UTC)