Valdavia

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Valdavia!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Sz-iwbot 12:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Bandera de Villasila de Valdavia.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bandera de Villasila de Valdavia.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 12:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Escudo Villasila y Villamelendro de Valdavia.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Escudo Villasila y Villamelendro de Valdavia.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 13:21, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:IglesiaVillamelendro001.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by ABFbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --abf /talk to me/ (using a bot) 11:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:RioValdaviaEnVillamelendro001.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by ABFbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --abf /talk to me/ (using a bot) 11:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image with unknown source, license or permission

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi! There is still one or more of your Images in this Category. If you do not do the relevant changes, the Image will be deleted on 6th of may. COM:L may help you to find out how your Image would be correct.
Best regards, abf /talk to me/ (using a bot) 12:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC) This message was added by a bot in a test-run. Please feedback this notice at User talk:ABF/Bottemplate. Thanks in advance.Reply

Image:IglesiaSanJuanMoarves.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 19:49, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:CastilloRebolledoDeLaTorre.JPG

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 20:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Posicion animales

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, efectivamente por defecto no solo aguilas sino cualquier figura animal mira hacia la izquierda del observador, o dicho en el lenguaje heraldico, a diestra. Otra cosa se especifica con el adjetivo retornado, contornado,etc. No obstante he estado mirando el armorial de Piferrer de 1870 y pico creo, y pinta el aguila retornada en Aguilar de Campoo. No sé, habra que seguir investigando. Saludos, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 16:29, 19 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Banderas

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Pues estaré al tanto, por ahora no logro descubrir la causa. Sí que he visto en algún caso, ya alguien lo había comentado, que si un objeto queda visible a medias (entre el espacio de trabajo y exterior a este), pues no funciona su representación en Wikipedia. Sin embargo, hay casos en los que solucionando esto no se soluciona. Para las banderas vizcaínas, al final del Atlas correspondiente hay un vínculo a la web de la Diputación, debes acceder e "iniciar sesión" clicando al botón correspondiente. Una vez hecho, reaccede a la página con el vínculo original. Ahí encontrarás PDFs de cada municipio, con info de los escudos y si tienen, también info sobre las banderas. Pero la documentación es antigua de hace algunos años, y si algunos municipios han registrado posteriormente sus enseñas, ahí no estarán. En tal caso, puedes probar con el buscador del BOP de Vizcaya, aunque su buscador no es muy cómodo. Saludos! --HansenBCN (talk) 13:44, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Castrillo

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

El tema es de ortografía. Si al final de la descripción del segundo cuartel viene bordura con mayuscula es que se refiere a todo el escudo. Si se refiere al segundo, debe ir en minusculas precedida de punto y coma o coma. Revisa entonces lo que has puesto como descripcion. La de esa web tampoco sirve de arreglo.--SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 12:48, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Aclarado, ya lo arreglo yo. Por otra parte, preguntas que sentido tiene separar dos campos de igual color. La razón es que en heráldica cada campo es representativo y por tanto, no se puede hace ninguna fusión: pongamos que unimos en un partido las armas de castilla (castillo de oro en campo de gules) con las de navarra (cadenas de oro en campo de gules)...el resultado NO es un escudo en campo de gules, con una cadena de oro a diestra acostada de un castillo de lo mismo a siniestra. Sobre tu "lio", chico, lo siento pero yo como los otros compañeros, tampoco entiendo tu problema y lo que es más inquietante, has usado la plantilla de borrado de manera un poco irresponsable. La proxima vez, pregunta a alguien como Rastrojo que creo que es administrador por estos lares. Saludos, --SanchoPanzaXXI (talk) 17:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

imagenes duplicadas

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Por las imagenes duplicadas, puedes poner {{duplicate|Image:otraimagen}} en la que quieres borrar. Es mas rapido y no es necesario ponerlos en la lista de borradas. Asi no haces tanto trabajo para ti y los otros. :) -Nard the Bard 12:04, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Para mi, [1] se ve completamente bien, que hace para ti? El otro, no se, a lo mejor tienes una imagen no svg encajada. Mediawiki no las renderiza bien. -Nard the Bard 16:33, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

NoEscudo

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Buenas! No, creo que no hay. Pero tener uno puede ser cómodo y útil, así que buena idea. Sin embargo, tendremos que ir bien con lupa antes de ir poniéndola en los armoriales. Saludos! --HansenBCN (talk) 20:26, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:Bandera_de_Velilla_del_Rio_Carrion.svg

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Bandera_de_Velilla_del_Rio_Carrion.svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Sterkebaktalk 12:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 13 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ /−

Hello, Valdavia!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Casa blasonada Barajores de la Peña 002.jpg is uncategorized since 11 March 2009. BotMultichillT 06:30, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Image:Bandera Autilla del Pino.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Ancient Roman Mosaics West Gallery La Olmeda Pedrosa De La Vega - Saldaña (Palencia).jpg was uncategorized on 2 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 09:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Villanuño de Valdavia 005 Fountain.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Villanuño de Valdavia 004 Fountain.jpg was uncategorized on 28 November 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Castles in Castile and León

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Lo tendré en cuenta a partir de ahora. Muchas gracias y buena jornada. --C3PO (talk) 11:39, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seguiré la convención del título de las fotografías de ahora en adelante (Espero acordarme!). Muchas gracias por dejarme compartir tu página. Feliz jornada.--C3PO (talk) 13:04, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. A ver si tengo tiempo para desenredar la madeja. Feliz jornada.--C3PO (talk) 08:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey Valdavia, buena labor categorizando, pero Pociague y Pociaguillo son ruinas de iglesias, no de castillos ;) Salu2 Rastrojo _(D•ES) 16:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Taking over a category

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Did you notice what was in this category? It was for insects. See the taxonomy navigation at the top? You must of since you remove it. Oh well, I'll disambiguate one of them for you. Also, don't over-categorize. Rocket000 (talk) 08:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Already taken care. I wasn't sure if you knew what you did. Cheers, Rocket000 (talk) 08:57, 29 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Escudo Herrera de Pisuerga 001.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Escudo Saldaña 003 PlazaVieja.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Villavega de Castrillo 001.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

in province of ---> in the province of

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments1 person in discussion

Hello Valdavia. People who apply hotcat, using in the province of, miss categories containg in province of. I have put a request about this problem, which is of interest for you, see [2]. Greetings, --Havang(nl) (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for yout quick response. May I invite you to add interwikis to the categories of those spanish municipalities I am actually creating and filling? I have done Category:municipalities of Badajoz without interwikis and Category:Municipalities of Cáceres with only spanish interwiki; I haave planned for this week doing Category:Municipalities of Ávila with only spanish interwiki, see my progress at User:Havang(nl)/List 1. Greetings --Havang(nl) (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

For categories it is not done by a bot. You open two windows, one at commons category, and one at the spanish wikipage. You start at the spanish wikipage, you click Editar, you go down the page and you find below the categories a block with interwikis (without the spanish interwiki of course, you are in the spanish wiki yet). You copy that block, you go to the commons window at the corresponding category, you edit that category and you paste the interwiki list, taking care that the spanish pagetitle es:spanish pagetitle is there also. Try a few, i'll look at it tomorrow. Good night. --Havang(nl) (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oke so, for the interwikis. And over 600 cats are moving. Don't forget to log in. --Havang(nl) (talk) 20:21, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Maps of Pontevedra

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Category:Maps of municipalities of Pontevedra and Category:Maps of Pontevedra are mixed up. You know Spain better than I do. Can you clean a bit by putting all maps of municipalities in the first category, and all other maps in the second? Greetings, --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:08, 19 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please don't blank pages

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Valdavia,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Category:Castles of Bacares on Commons. If you meant for the page to be deleted, blanking the page is not the right way to do this. A simple real-world comparison to illustrate: You removed the entire text of a page from a thick folder, but the then empty, useless page itself remained in the folder.

Please use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regularly for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed.

For redirects use #REDIRECT[[Target]] or {{category redirect|Targetcategoryname}}. For more information please read Blanking. Thanks again. –Krinkle^talk 20:50, 1 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

duplicate tag

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Valdavia, please do not tag original images from reworked versions as duplicates. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Orujo_de_hierbas.jpg&diff=50907447&oldid=44812817 They are no duplicates and are still needed. A reworked version does not supersede a orig version. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 15:59, 27 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Mil gracias

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Por dedicarme un artículo :) Y respecto a lo de La Olmeda, sintiéndolo mucho no va a poder ser. Estoy liadísimo y apenas tengo tiempo para sacar la basura de mi lista de seguimiento. Mil gracias por el ofrecimiento y por la dedicatoria. Un abrazo Rastrojo _(D•ES) 22:17, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

La Olmeda

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, compañero, cuánto tiempo. Pues verás, la verdad es que el proyecto del artículo me gusta, pero últimamente apenas estoy editando, pues casi no dispongo de tiempo excepto algunas madrugadas. No obstante, colaboraré en lo que pueda y dentro de mis posibilidades. Por cierto, en el wikiproyecto ya tenemos un artículo con estrella (jeje), que precisamente aparecerá en portada los próximos días. Saludos y ánimos. --Goldorak (talk) 01:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Carrión de Los Condes 008 Saint Zoilo Capital.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Lista de monumentos de Palencia

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, he visto tus modificaciones a la Lista de monumentos de Palencia y sólo te comento que estamos centralizando el trabajo en las listas que hay en la wikipedia en castellano, es:Categoría:Anexos:Bienes_de_interés_cultural_en_España. Si te parece bien, tus aportaciones allí nos serían de gran ayuda. Saludos, --Elisardojm (talk) 23:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Plantilla y categoría

Latest comment: 13 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Buenas. He visto ediciones tuyas como esta quitando una categoría y una plantilla. Retirar la primera supongo que atiende a evitar redundancias de categorización, utilizando una categoría concreta del monumento que ya esté categorizada a su vez como bienes de interés cultural de la provincia de Palencia. Sin embargo no entiendo lo de retirar la plantilla {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011|es}} ¿Es un error? Saludos. Montgomery (talk) 08:03, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ná tranqui. Al principio pensé que tenías envidia de mis grandiosas fotos tiradas en modo automático :P, pero luego caí en lo mismo que dices. Lo de la plantilla más que nada es para que quede constancia de que entran dentro del concurso WLM 2011, para hacer bulto porque hay usuarios que están subiendo muchas y de mucha calidad. Montgomery (talk) 12:31, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Se explica aquí en donde también se indican los pasos a seguir y un asistente de subidas. Básicamente lo de concurso es una excusa para intentar colaboración de la gente para fotografiar todos los bienes de interés de tipo monumental. En la provincia de Palencia son casi 200 (su código debe empezar por 51, los monumentos) y aunque se pueden subir fotografías tomadas en cualquier momento del pasado, para entrar en el concurso deben ser subidas exclusivamente durante este mes. Así que si quieres participar date prisa, me extraña que no lo hayas visto antes (ha estado apareciendo un banner en Wikipedia anunciándolo todo este mes). Montgomery (talk) 12:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

La plantilla {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2011|es}} indica que pertenece al concurso, edición española y {{BIC|RI-51-0000066}} que es el monumento con identificador RI-51-0000066. Verás seguramente las ediciones de Wiki-Bot categorizando dentro de la categoría de cada provincia, a partir del monumento (y unos pocos monumentos, para los que tengo introducidas las categorías específicas). Platonides (talk) 13:56, 27 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cuidado al categorizar, no elimines la plantilla {{BIC}} [3] [4] Platonides (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Es correcto poner la plantilla BIC en la categoría (cuando toda la categoría se refiere a ese monumento). Pero tiene que mantenerse igualmente en la página de la imagen. Platonides (talk) 14:22, 10 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Some help about Spanish naming standard

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, could you explain the to User talk:Tres1416 about the naming standard in the provinces of Spain. Thank you.

And could you have a look in the (mostly) uncategorised files in Category:Monumento mainly from Special:Contributions/AmebaEnSalsa and the contribitions of Special:Contributions/DanielRiveroSuárez. Thank you. --Foroa (talk) 11:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Villarcayo 001 Los Leones Potato chips.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Villarcayo 001 Los Leones Potato chips.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Acather96 (talk) 14:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Aqueduct of Abánades (Canal of Castile in Osorno la Mayor) 018.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Aqueduct of Abánades (Canal of Castile in Osorno la Mayor) 018.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Acather96 (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Aqueduct of Abánades (Canal of Castile in Osorno la Mayor) 017.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Aqueduct of Abánades (Canal of Castile in Osorno la Mayor) 017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Acather96 (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

	Hello, Valdavia. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ /−

Category:Domingo_de_Guzmán

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Domingo_de_Guzmán has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

GFreihalter (talk) 07:43, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Novelas Teresa Prado - Serpiente 001.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Novelas Teresa Prado - Serpiente 001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Novelas Teresa Prado - Serpiente 001.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lobo (howl?) 19:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Novelas Teresa Prado - Aldán y las Rosas de la Noche 001.jpg

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Novelas Teresa Prado - Aldán y las Rosas de la Noche 001.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Novelas Teresa Prado - Aldán y las Rosas de la Noche 001.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Lobo (howl?) 19:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Santos Justo y Pastor

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

He solicitado el borrado de las categorías que creaste con el nombre de los santos Just y Pasteur (en francés) y las he reemplazado por una traducción inglesa más correcta —Justus y Pastor—. Gracias por tu comprensión. --DPC (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Manzaneda de[l] Torío

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hola, He solicitado que se borre la categoría "Manzaneda del Torío" porque el nombre del lugar va sin el artículo, es Manzaneda de Torío. No sé si he seguido bien el procedimiento, porque esto de Commons es un poco lioso para mí. Un saludo cordial. Macarrones (talk) 16:16, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Template:WorksSpainCat

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Template:WorksSpainCat has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Sreejith K (talk) 19:20, 11 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Osorno 001 Chopitos de Osorno 001.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Osorno 001 Chopitos de Osorno 001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Lobo (howl?) 21:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

foto de la Olmeda

Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

He visto una foto en la que apareces como autor pero que me resulta extraño, te explico: es una foto tomada en 1968 según dices en la descripción, pero los metadatos son de 2010. ¿Es una foto de una fotografía? De ser así creo que incurriría en violación de copyright, pues esta foto aparece en libros como perteneciente al archivo de la Diputación de Palencia. --DPC (talk) 07:07, 7 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Pues tal cual me lo cuentas incurre en violación de copyright. Para que sea admisible debe haber un permiso de OTRS en el que el autor, el autor o poseedor de los derechos de autor, ceda los derechos.
La foto File:Javier Cortes Álvarez de Miranda.jpg ¿está en la misma situación? --DPC (talk) 10:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vaya, una pena. ¿No podrías contactar con los autores para que dieran permiso? Yo no puedo borrarlas, así que las marco, pero no te pondré aquí las plantillas correspondientes, porque ya lo sabes. --DPC (talk) 10:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

¿No decías que la del 68 la tomó Luis Saldaña? Si te pones en contacto con él recuerda que el permiso debe seguir las normas OTRS. --DPC (talk) 10:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nono, arriba te aclaro que te lo había dicho al reves, la del 68 está sacada del libro de mosaicos editado por la Olmeda, es una foto de una foto. La que sale Don Javier paseando por Saldaña es la que es de Luis, él se puso ya en contacto conmigo porque no sabía quien era, y me dijo que la foto era suya, (me la pasó un familiar de Javier que trabaja en el Ayto de Saldaña de hecho), y a partir de ahí me dejó hacer. Si hay que borrarlas no es problema. Saludos Valdavia (talk) 10:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Cómo sabes que es un botón

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hola, me gustaría saber que sabes de esta imagen. Gracias --Parair (talk) 21:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Gracias --Parair (talk) 21:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Escudo de Cisneros (Palencia)

Buenas tardes Sr. Valdavia. He visto en el armorial de Palencia el escudo de Cisneros que realizó en su día. Quería comentarle que el jaquelado, como se indica en el segundo cuartel, debe tener sus particiones al estilo del tablero del ajedrez por lo que si en vez de utilizar 5 filas x 3 columnas dibuja 3 filas x 5 columnas se aproximará mas a la realidad, y eso si, siempre empezando por oro como el blasón indica y está dibujado Reciba un cordial saludo Fernando

Move requests

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Valdavia. You used number 3 instead of a real reason in {{Move}} template, at least twice ([5], [6]).

When we check Rename a category, there is nothing like "reason 3". The section "Type of renames" mentions "Controversial fixes" as the third type. However, it is not a reason.

If you meant Commons:File renaming (which is not intendes for category renames)), the reason 3 is "Correct misleading names into accurate ones". I can see nothing misleading on bracket disambiguation, even though coma dismbiguation is preferred in some cases. --ŠJů (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Global account

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Valdavia! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:29, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Food of Biscay Leche Beyena 001.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Food of Biscay Leche Beyena 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

🎂CAKE🎂 09:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Food of Zamora province Leche Gaza 001.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Food of Zamora province Leche Gaza 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

🎂CAKE🎂 09:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Queso De Burgos 001.JPG

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Queso De Burgos 001.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

🎂CAKE🎂 12:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

a heads-up

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As I noted here you should have been contacted when another contributor nominated Category:Miranda_extermination_camp for deletion. Geo Swan (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Mariano de La Mata Aparico 002 BarrioDelaPuebla.JPG

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Mariano de La Mata Aparico 002 BarrioDelaPuebla.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Andy Mabbett (talk) 19:05, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Antonio y Miguel de Oquendo

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Buenas, Valdavia. Te escribo con referencia a una categoría de commons que creaste hace ya unos años. En concreto la de "Antonio de Oquendo". En ella figura una fotografía que no corresponde a Antonio de Oquendo sino a su padre, el también marino Miguel de Oquendo, lo que puede crear algo de confusión. Se trata de la foto "JohnPine TheBurningAndCaptureOfTheSanSalvador.jpg". Es en la categoría de Miguel de Oquendo (que también tu creaste) en la que debe estar esta foto, y no en la de Antonio. Saludos. --Zumalabe (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:Black_pudding_by_country

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Black pudding by country has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Themightyquill (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:TELLO TÉLLEZ INSTITUCIÓN EMBLEMA.tif

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:TELLO TÉLLEZ INSTITUCIÓN EMBLEMA.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Discasto _talk 08:14, 4 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Reinosa 018 Orujo El Coterón.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Reinosa 018 Orujo El Coterón.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Discasto _talk 22:41, 28 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Saludos y ofertas

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

¡Hola! Veo que estás catalogando estaciones del Vía Crucis. Te recomiendo la categoría Category:Stations of the Cross in the Land of Valencia donde encontrarás un puñado de ellas. Si te aburres puedes darte un paseo también por "Decorated tiles in the Land of Valencia" y sus subcategorías, que también son de mucho vicio. Estoy construyendo un catálogo en Wikidata de monumentos de la Comunidad Valenciana y estos enanos salen por todas partes, son de mucho vicio, ya te digo.

Como tienes un cierto aspecto palentino, te diré que en otro de los líos en que ando metido, es:wiki:Wikiproyecto:Ningún municipio español sin fotografía, nos faltan fotos de Amayuelas de Arriba. Puedes acercarte, echarle fotos y probablemente los frikis del asunto -somos bastantes- te hagamos hijo predilecto. A Palencia sólo le falta ese municipio, pero también hay huecos en Burgos, Salamanca y otras provincias.

Gracias

B25es (talk) 10:55, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:Galleta_María

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Galleta María has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

JopkeB (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Same target for category move

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

You requested a move on Category:Church of San Bartolomé (Bustillo de Santullán) but the target is the same as the current name. Could you indicate the name you actually want?

Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic