User talk:Spurzem/Archive 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotus 87B (2007-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2006-06-17 10 Imperia 500 H Sport, Bj. 1929 (kl).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Mattbuck 15:11, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-17 96 Porsche 550 Replica ( retusch).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 12:19, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Artefakte

Zu deiner Frage Where do you see many artifacts or what do you mean with artifacts? – lies mal Wikipedia unter Blockartefakt. Das fragliche Bild vom Fahrwerk einer 747 ist voll davon, sämtliche Kanten sind von Artefakten gesäumt, dazu ist die Farbtiefe einzelner Flächen (z.B. der blanke Teil des Hydraulikzylinders) so weit reduziert, daß es schon mehr wie Malen-nach-Zahlen aussieht als nach Fotografie. Gestalterisch schönes Bild, aber durch aggressive JPG-Kompression verdorben. Schade, aber leider typisch für ein fotografierendes Telefon (und was anderees will der Autor ja anscheinend nicht benutzen). Das als Erklärung, falls du wirklich nicht weißt, was man in der digitalen Bildverarbeitung unter Artefakten versteht. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 06:47, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Bildkritik

Ich versuche es jetzt ein allerletztes Mal.

Wenn du auf die ehrlich vorgebrachte Ansicht anderer zu einem deiner Bilder mit solchem Sarkasmus wie hier reagierst, wird schon sehr bald sich kaum noch jemand deine Bilder überhaupt ansehen wollen. Ich persönlich habe mir auch schon überlegt, ob ich deine Bilder nicht künftig einfach ignoriere und mir damit den Streß erspare, für jede negative Aussage Erklärungen zu schulden oder Sarkasmen einzustecken. Wenn ich äußere, daß mir ein Bild nicht gefällt, dann ist es niemals meine Absicht, den Autor zu kränken oder ihm die fotografische Kompetenz abzusprechen. Es ist eine Anregung für den Autor, sich zu überlegen, wie es vielleicht noch besser geht. Das dürfte auch für andere Kritiker auf QI gelten.

Wenn du ein Bild zur Kritik stellst, dann lebe damit, daß es anderen nicht so gefällt wie dir. Und wenn das jemand äußert, dann heißt das nicht, daß das gesamte Bild absolut schlecht ist (wie du Lmbuga in deinem Kommentar unterstellst), sondern es heißt, daß es diesem einen nicht gefällt. Beleidigte Tiefschläge wie „natürlich, du bist der einzige, der Recht hat, und das Bild ist scheiße“ sind absoluter Mist, denn sie sprechen dem anderen das Recht ab, seine Meinung über dein Bild zu äußern. Und mehr hat Lmbuga ja nicht getan, oder? Es ist sein gutes Recht, dein Bild schlecht zu finden und dir das auch zu sagen – zumindest in einem Kontext, in dem es darum geht, Bilder zu beurteilen.

Du hast ihm vorgeworfen, er verstehe deine Intention nicht. Aber: Es ist nicht Aufgabe des Betrachters, erst mal beim Fotografen nachzufragen, was er denn mit dem Bild gewollt hat, bevor er seinen Eindruck davon äußert. Es ist die Aufgabe des Bildes, dem Betrachter diese Intention mitzuteilen! Wenn aus dem Bild die Intention nicht klar wird, dann ist das ein Mangel des Bildes – und nicht ein Fehler des Betrachters! Sei froh, wenn du spontane Äußerungen wie die von Lmbuga überhaupt bekommst, denn das gibt dir eine Vorstellung davon, wie dein Bild bei anderen ankommt, und daß deine Intention vielleicht doch nicht so klar aus dem Bild hervorgeht. Das kannst du selbst nämlich überhaupt nicht wissen. Deshalb stellt man ja Bilder zur Kritik: um ehrliche Meinungen anderer zu bekommen. Ich habe jedoch generell den Eindruck, daß du überhaupt nicht Kritik (also aufrichtige Stellungnahme), sondern Bestätigung (also nur Lob) suchst.

Klick an dieser Stelle bitte mal hier drauf. Die Gedanken dieses Mannes sind pures Gold. Hat mir sehr weitergeholfen, mit Bildkritiken umzugehen. Und vor allem, sie auf das Bild zu beziehen und nicht persönlich auf mich oder mein fotografisches Gesamtwerk :-)

Deine Intention bei dem hier zur Diskussion stehenden Bild ist mir persönlich klar, aber ich finde die technische Ausführung nicht gut. Es wirkt auf mich ähnlich, als hättest du das Auto ausgeschnitten und komplett auf einen altrosa Hintergrund gestellt. Oder den Hintergrund einfach geschwärzt. Das Bild ist für mich kein Ganzes mehr, es wirkt nicht natürlich. Das Auto an sich, wie gesagt, ist schön fotografiert, aber das gesamte Bild, die Komposition, ist durch die unnatürlich scharf-unscharfe Umgebung für mich verdorben.

Wenn du mehr solcher Rückmeldungen bekommst, weißt du, daß du auf diese Art von Bearbeitung künftig besser verzichtest, und wirst (in meinen Augen) anhand dieser Erkenntnis schönere Bilder abliefern. Aber diese Erkenntnis kannst du nur dann haben, wenn du negative, aber aufrichtige (und damit konstruktive!) Kritiken als Ansporn nimmst – und nicht sofort um dich schlägst, als habe man dich angegriffen.

--Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:51, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Kreuzschnabel, für die Mühe, die Du Dir mit mir machst, danke ich Dir. Zustimmen kann ich Dir trotzdem nicht in jedem Punkt. Und dass meine Bilder inzwischen ignoriert werden, habe ich bereits bemerkt. Ich habe deshalb in den letzten Tagen auch keine mehr nominiert. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 356 B race (2008-06-28) rear.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Schärfe, Belichtung, Farben - alles ok. --Berthold Werner 10:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen!

Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Liebe_r Spurzem,

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Dein Bild ist eines der besten hundert Fotos von Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Deutschland!

Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei [email protected] melden.

Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Atamari (talk) 20:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Atamari, vielen Dank für die anerkennenden Worte und für die Einladung, die ich aber aus verschiedenen Gründen nicht annehmen kann oder möchte. Ich bin überrascht, dass dieses Bild vom Hambacher Schloss der Jury gefiel. Denn als Qualitätsfoto der Commons hatte es keine Chance. Die Experten ignorierten es einfach (es erscheint auch bei der Dateiverwendung merkwürdigerweise nicht); es war ihnen offensichtlich des Anschauens nicht wert. Ob ich es noch mal vorstellen sollte, ist die Frage. Aber wahrscheinlich würde das Urteil dann „Decline“ lauten. Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:42, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Nur Mut! Unter den 37xx Fotos, die ich auswählen durfte, war deines neben File:Rpn006-3.JPG und File:LWL-Industriemuseum-HenrichshütteR119955.jpg unter meinen ersten Dreien. Es gibt übrigens den Publikumspreis. Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:51, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Spurzem, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 09:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU 251 OSL, Bj. 1941 (2012-06-10 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If you have a look at the background, the picture seems tilted to the right. Apart from that, a really good and impressive picture, IMO no doubt QI --DKrieger 22:29, 31 October 2012 Done. Look now please. -- Lothar Spurzem 10:22 1 November 2012 (UTC)  Support after correction now good quality --THWZ 10:44, 1 November 2012 (UTC)  Comment good image, but slightly some chromatic aberration in helmets and lighthouse for me --Rjcastillo 15:40, 1 November 2012 (UTC) QI to me now --DKrieger 17:14, 1 November 2012 ) CA corrected. O. K.? -- Lothar Spurzem 18:29 1 November 2012 (UTC

Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list#Wie stelle ich ein Bild zur Wahl?

Ich habe es mal übersetzt, weiß aber nicht, wie man es am besten in die Seite einfügt. --Kersti (talk) 23:08, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 1000 TC, Bj. 1969 (2008-06-28 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sharpness ok, but needs noise reduction and could be a little bit brighter. --THWZ 01:31, 2 November 2012 Done. Please look now. -- Lothar Spurzem 12:00 2 November 2012 (UTC) I felt free to help you a little bit, now I think it's ok! --THWZ 00:01, 3 November 2012 (UTC) Thank you very much! -- Lothar Spurzem 08:18 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Bild M-B 220 Cabriolet A

File:2007-07-08 Mercedes-Benz 220 S, Cabriolet A (kl) reduced-Shadow.jpg

Ich habe gerade eine neu "Verfassung" aus deine Bild hergestellt. Ich hoffe du bist nicht gar dagegen. Ich bin selbst nicht 100% ueberzeugt das Bild verbessert zu haben. Ich mag schon sehr das Original. Aber ich dachte es war ein bissel dunkel am Heck-portion des Autos, vor allem wann durch eine kleine Bildschirm beobachtet.

Vielen Dank (nocheinmal) fuer so viel tolle Beitraege.

MfG Charles01 (talk) 20:46, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Charles, ich bin nicht begeistert; denn Deine Bearbeitung des Bildes ist sehr schlecht. Vor allem die Front des Wagens ist viel zu hell. Sei bitte so nett und lass diese neue Version schnell löschen.

… I become not enthusiastic for your revise of the photo because it is very bad. Mostly the front of the car is much too bright. Please let delete this new version. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:12, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zündapp Bella R 154 (2008-05-21) Seitenansicht ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JDP90 04:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Prima III K (2011-08-06 Foto Sp) Ausschn.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you lighten it a bit up? Poco a poco 11:23, 16 November 2012 (UTC) Done. But only a little bit so that it is not too bright. -- Lothar Spurzem 13:55 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kurfürstl Palais Trier Nordflügel (2012-10-09 Sp C).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:12, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward P 100 (2007-09-08).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:45, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lok 41 360 (2009-05-31) 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:35, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kesselheim, Kirche St. Martin (2009-04-04)-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2007-06-16 Auto Union 1000 (Frontpartie).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:40, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arabella de Luxe 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2005-08-27 Isabella Coupé Cabrio (bearb).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vincent C Rapide, Bj. 1952 (2009-08-07 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW 335 Cabriolet, Bj. 1939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:02, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto Union 1000 Sp (2008-07-12) ret.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MB 190 SL am 2006-07-16 (ret kl).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auto Union 1000 S (2012-08-19 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 22:55, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 180 D (2012-08-19 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality (and a quiet background this time :) --Selbymay 19:14, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 170 S Cabriolet B, Bj. 1950 (ret kl).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok, trotz der Leute, die kann man nicht wegzaubern --Ralf Roletschek 11:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cooper Bristol T40, Bj. 1955 (2011-08-13 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment very good, but chromatic aberration needs to be fixed. See notes --Rjcastillo 00:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC) Done. Thank you for the review. -- Lothar Spurzem 11:00, 9 December 2012 (UTC) Comment better.OK for QI imo --Rjcastillo 19:57, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!!

   Merry Christmas !!!...Best regards, --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Dear Rjcastillo, thank you very much for your greetings. I wish you a merry Christmas too. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Hallo Lothar! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Georgij -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Dank und ebenfalls alle guten Wünsche für Dich! -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:53, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

QI candidates of dec.26

I may play this ridiculous little game with you too.--Jebulon (talk) 02:14, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

It is not a play. Why should it? You are very critical of other but obviously you do not like that you are critized. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:46, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

OK, let's see how you will be ridiculous in CR.--Jebulon (talk) 11:23, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

And notice that I don't criticize "you" or anybody, but pictures (that's the difference...).--Jebulon (talk) 11:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

You may be interested by this.--Jebulon (talk) 15:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Lothar, it would be good if you drop a line in the thread initiated by Jebulon and so try to close this topic Poco a poco (talk) 09:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. But I can't do more than apologize. Further I should try to take not part at QI any longer. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:10, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for apologize, that's enough for me. No need to leave QI, which needs your pictures.--Jebulon (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you and kind regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Jo Siffert

Excuse me, still in english... I'm writing an article about Jo Siffert in french wikipedia and I have already use all your pictures uploaded on Commons. Did you have, in your old pictures, more to upload on Commons ? Thanx for your work (and happy new year.)-cobra bubbles (talk) 18:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo, I don't think that I have more useful photos of Jo Siffert. Sorry. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 18:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

POTY Wahl

Hallo Lothar, ich sehe dass Du Schwierigkeiten hattest Deine Stimme zur Liste hinzuzufügen. Bitte nutze exakt:

# [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]]

so dass es dann vor dem Speichern so aussieht:

# [[User:ErsterWähler|ErsterWähler]]
# [[User:Abc|Abc]]
# [[User:UndSoWeiter|UndSoWeiter]]
# [[User:LetzterWähler|LetzterWähler]]
# [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|]]

Damit sollte es funktionieren. Zur Erinnerung: das war das Foto, für das Du versuchtest zu stimmen.

Wenn Du JavaScript in Deinem Browser aktivierst, funktioniert das Wählen auch viel einfacher.

Der Grund für diese restriktive Gestaltung ist die automatische Überwachung der Wahlseiten durch den Missbrauchsfilter.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Rillke^(q?) 21:59, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Rillke, vielen Dank für Deine Hilfe. Vermutlich wird aber meine Stimmabgabe nicht funktionieren; denn JavaScript ist auf meinem Rechner installiert – soweit ich es als Laie beurteilen kann –, aber der Benutzername (vier Tilden) wird an verschiedenen Stellen in den Commons nicht erkannt. Das ist aber weiter nicht schlimm; die Wahl wird auch ohne meine Stimme zu einem Ergebnis führen. ;-) Ich will mich ohnehin bei den Qualitätsbildern usw. wie auch bei KEB zunehmend zurückhalten und vor allem keine Bilder mehr vorstellen. Dir trotzdem noch mal herzlichen Dank! Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 22:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Die vier Tilden werden schon erkannt, aber nicht bei POTY akzeptiert. Und bei QIC funktionieren sie nicht, weil es innerhalb einer Galerie generell nicht funktioniert. Übrigens brauchst Du JavaScript nicht zu installieren. Installieren kann man nur Java (das jetzt von Oracle und vorher von Sun hergegestellt wurde). Java brauchst Du aber gar nicht. JavaScript kann Dein Browser (also das Programm, dass die aktuelle Seite anzeigt; z.B. Mozilla Firefox oder Microsoft Internet Explorer, Google Chrome oder Apple Safari). In diesem Programm kannst Du auch einstellen, ob JavaScript aktiviert ist oder nicht. So wird's gemacht. Allerdings solltest Du beachten, dass der Browser dadurch angreifbarer und langsamer wird. -- Rillke^(q?) 11:06, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Jo Siffert

As you can see here, http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Siffert, we've made a quite good article about Jo Siffert. I wanted, once again, to thank you for your vintage pictures. cobra bubbles (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

I am glad to see that you like my photos. Kindest regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Opel Admiral bei Vox

Hallo Spurzem,

Gerade lief auf VOX in der Sendung "Auto Motor Sport" kurz dein Bild vom Opel Admiral (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Opel_Admiral_Cabriolet,_Bauzeit_1937-1939_(08.07.2007).jpg durch. Dabei hieß es nur "Quelle: Wikipedia". Ich gehe davon aus, dass das gegen die CC-SA-Lizenz verstößt. Das Bild kam direkt am Anfang der Sendung.

Nur als Hinweis, falls hier eine uunerlaubte Nutzung vorliegt.

Danke! Mal sehen, ob ich mit den Leuten Verbindung aufnehmen kann. Gruß -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 853, Bj. 1936 (2013-05-04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 21:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 853 Cabriolet, Bj. 1936 (2013-05-04).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 21:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi TT Heck (Sp 2013-04-30 B).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK Support --Rjcastillo 17:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Horex-Logo.JPG

File:Horex-Logo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

79.237.152.65 12:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 356 B, Bj. 1960 (2013-05-04 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr schön. --Frank Schulenburg 05:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 911 T, Bj. 1972, ADAC Mittelrhein Classic 2013.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI  Support --Rjcastillo 22:43, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glas 1204 Cabrio, Bj. 1964 (2013-05-04 ret).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ganz klar, super Aufnahme, trotz ungünstigem Licht und hellem Hintergrund --Ralf Roletschek 08:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-04 (9591b) Citroën SM, Bj. 1973.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 17:10, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2013-05-04 (9603b) Mercedes-Benz 280 SL (W 113), Bj. 1969.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --Kreuzschnabel 06:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU-Fiat Jagst Riviera Vignale Cabrio.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rudge Brumm Special, 350 ccm, Bj. 1937 (2008-06-28).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:16, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferrari 308 quattrovalvole (Spu 2013-09-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:53, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Laß Dir die Freude

an der Mitarbeit hier nicht trüben, nur weil eine IP einen LA gestellt hat. Hier einen absichtlich ausgeloggten Benutzer, der nur zur feig ist, zu vermuten - mag sein, dass dies so war, aber von zu bequem zum Einloggen über unbemerkt vom System aus ungeklärten Gründen ausgeloggt (ist mir auch schon passiert, warum auch immer) ist vieles denkbar. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 03:54, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 356 A Speedster (2013-09-15 Spu).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Kreuzschnabel 20:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat Abarth 695 (2013-09-15 Spu).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Why have you exactly downscaled to 2 MP? --Tuxyso 22:45, 26 September 2013 (UTC) I did not downscale it. But I took this photo on a great distance and cropped it to see mainly the car. -- Spurzem 17:55, 27 September 2013 (UTC) Nonetheless QI for me. Welch ein Zufall, dass du beim Crop genau auf 2 MPs kamst :) --Tuxyso 11:24, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Autokritiken bei QI

Hallo Spurzem,
danke für deine Kritiken bei den Fahrzeugen auf den QIC. Bei den technischen Problemen, die du mit den Bildern hast (tw. überbelichtet, zu starke Kontraste etc.) kann ich die Kritik auch nachvollziehen (auch wenn ich sie nicht zwingend teile). Auch der störende Zettel ist o.k. - fallen halt 80% der potenziell hochladbaren Bilder weg (incl. eines Proton-Rennwagens). Bauchschmerzen habe ich jedoch mit den folgenden Aussagen:

• Das Auto sollte ins Bild hineinfahren, d. h. links etwas mehr Abstand zum Rand, rechts weniger. - Imho ist das eine reine Ermessenssache und extrem subjektiv; in diesem speziellen Fall ist es auch kaum realisierbar ohne das daneben stehende Fahrzeug anzuschneiden und dann entfernen zu müssen - es handelt sich ja um ein stehende und nicht um ein fahrendes Auto. Oder übersehe ich da eine Grundregel der Komposition der Fahrzeugfotografie?
• Further I don't like the decorations at the car. ... ähm, hätte ich sie vorher abbauen sollen? Abgebildet ist ein aufgemotzter Käfer, auch wenn dir ein Käfer im Ursprungszustand lieber wäre ....

Nicht falsch verstehe - ich erkenne an, dass ich dir in Erfahrung bei Fahrzeugen und Fahrzeugfotografie auch in 3 Jahren noch nicht das Wasser reichen kann (und will), aber ich würde erwarten, dass alle angesetzten Kriterien objektiv sind; dann bin ich auch gern lernfähig ... Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 10:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Als Qualitätsbild abgelehnt!

Lieber Achim, wenn wir Bilder in die Commons hochladen, müssen wir uns meines Erachtens fragen, ob sie hochwertig, eventuell Qualitätsbilder sind oder ob sie Seltenheitswert haben, dass wir sie deswegen den Commons anbieten. Letzteres trifft bei einer Reihe meiner Rennsportfotos zu, die ich für wertvoll halte, wegen unzureichender Schärfe aber hier nicht vorstellen würde. In einem Fall hatte ich es versucht - das war eine Aufnahme von Josef Siffert im BMW-Formel-2, die aber prompt zurückgewiesen wurde.

Was die Informationsblätter in den Windschutzscheiben betrifft, weiß ich, dass sie bei Oldtimerveranstaltungen meistens vorhanden sind. Hier und da ist es mir gelungen, sie wegzuretuschieren. Ein Foto mit einem solchen weißen Zettel ist für mich kein Qualitätsbild. Allerdings weiß ich, dass die meisten Juroren anders denken, und so wundere ich mich denn auch, was alles als QI durchgeht - nicht nur trotz der Zettel -, andererseits aber auch, was alles wegen kleinster Mängel abgeschmettert wird.

Bei dem Käfer-Bild könnte man fragen, was dargestellt werden soll: ein historisches Fahrzeug oder der schlechte Geschmack seines Besitzers. Mich stören insbesondere die makabren Strichlisten auf dem Seitenteil des Autos; für diese Art von Humor habe ich keinen Sinn.

Schließlich zu dem Porsche: Ich weiß nicht, ob es irgendwo eine Anleitung gibt, dass Fahrzeuge ins Bild hineinfahren sollen; aber vom Gefühl her scheint sich diese "Regel" zu ergeben. Technisch ware es einfach zu lösen. Du müsstest nur rechts etwas wegschneiden, und es passt.

Herzliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:40, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW Schnelllaster, Bj. 1950 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 07:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AU 1000 Sp Roadster (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW Junior, vorn (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horch 8, Typ 303, Bj. 1927 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW F91 Cabrio, Bj. 1953, Karmann.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 08:48, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Audi R8 LMP, Le Mans 2000 (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 19:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Selection WikiCon

Hallo Spurzem,
in den nächsten Tagen werde ich eine Zusammenstellung von Bildern auf commons machen, die bei der diesjährigen WikiCon in Karlsruhe gezeigt werden sollen - ich habe dabei auch bereits ein paar IAA-Bilder vom Wolf im Wald ergänzt. Da du in dem Bereich deutlich mehr Einblick hast würde ich mich freuen, wenn du mir hilfst: Ist es dir möglich, einen Satz sehr guter Bilder aus dem letzten Jahr /- - Menge erstmal egal, da ich eine Randomschleife anstrebe - aus dem Fahrzeugbereich (Schwerpunkt Oldies, gern auch aus anderen Bereichen - Ausnahme WLM, da dort eine eigene Show geplant ist) in die Category:Selection WikiCon 2013 zu ergänzen. WiW habe ich ebenfalls bereits angefragt. Gruß, -- Achim Raschka (talk) 06:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Achim, ich verstehe nicht ganz, worum es geht. Soll ich Bilder von Oldtimerveranstaltungen dieses Jahres in die angegebene Liste einfügen, zum Beispiel von der ADAC-Mittelrhein-Klassik? Wenn ja, müssen die Bilder als Qualitätsbilder ausgewiesen sein oder wird alles angenommen, was gefällt? Und was ist die WikiCon überhaupt bzw. wie läuft sie ab? Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW F91 Cabrio, Bj. 1953, vorn v. oben (museum mobile 2013-09-03).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW ZSW 500, Bj. 1929 (back).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DKW SS 250 - Seite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 05:28, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

QI persecution

I'm sorry you feel I'm persecuting you at QI, I'm honestly not. As anyone who's been there a while will know, I have high standards. I do not generally look at the authors - I just open the image, make a judgment, and then maybe then see the author when I'm writing the review. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

OK, I must only see your photos to recognize your high standards. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 19:26, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

By the way, you might want to archive this talk page - 110 sections is rather a lot. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:32, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Abgeordnetenhaus

Also, [1] Ihre bereits wiederholt zu lesenden Kommentare, die sinngemäß lauten, dass die Bilder zu langweilig sind um QI zu sein, oder gar, dass ich irgendwelche Extrawürste bei den Reviews bekomme, ignoriere ich mal, da mir dies einfach zu dumm ist. Aber zur Frage, wie die abgebildeten Personen zum Foto stehen, wiederhole ich mich auch jetzt gerne. Beim de:WP:Landtagsprojekt werden allen fotografierten Abgeordneten die Ergebnisse gezeigt und nur das behalten bzw. hochgeladen, was auch von denen freigegeben wurde. Wenn Sie mir nicht glauben, gbt es drei Zeugen, die Sie gerne befragen können: Olaf Kosinsky, Ralf Roletschek, Martin Rulsch. Von meiner Seite EOD. --A.Savin 00:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Interessant. Ich hätte nicht geglaubt, dass diese Leute hinsichtlich ihres Porträts so anspruchslos seien. Aber trotzdem: Gut sind die von mir kritisierten Fotos nicht. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:27, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Vote deleted

Sorry, I did not notice I was deleting your vote. I was just adding a nomination... --Velvet (talk) 08:17, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Bildupdates

Hallo! Ich habe deinen Disput wg. der langweiligen Bilder bei den QIs gelesen und kam auf dem Weg auch auf deine Benutzerseite. So bin ich auf deine spannenden Bemerkungen bzgl. der so genannten Bildverbessungen gestoßen. Das ist ehrlich gesagt aus meiner Sicht eine spannende Frage, denn ich sehe es ebenso nicht gerne, wenn andere meine Bilder - vor allem ohne Rückfrage - verändern. Man hat ja doch viele hundert Seiten unter Beobachtung. Aber nun der Grund meines Eintrags: Angeregt duch deinen Hinweis auf die Bildveränderungen habe ich mir erlaubt, im Forum von Commons eine Frage dazu zu stellen, die dich dann wahrscheinlich auch interessiert. Meiner Meinung nach wird da die Lizenz CC BY-SA 3.0 eher gebeugt und ist so auch nicht gemeint. Veränderte Bilder dürfen das Original des Urhebers nicht als aktuelles Bild überschreiben, sondern sollten unter einem anderen Namen aufgenommen werden.--XRay ^talk 16:18, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hallo XRay, danke für die Information. Gängige Meinung ist wohl, dass jeder ohne zu fragen Bilder unter freier Lizenz verändern darf, was mir auch sehr merkwürdig erschien. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hallo! Das Ändern ist (bei CC BY-SA) erlaubt, ja das stimmt. Aber der Bezug zum Originalbild muss meiner Meinung nach erhalten bleiben und genau das sehe ich als schwierig an. In der Beschreibung steht mein Name und nur aus der Versionshistorie erkenne ich, dass die letzten Änderungen gar nicht von mir sind. Der im Forum zitierte Text bezieht sich auf die Problematik. Die Definition "kleinere Änderungen" und die dortige Beschreibung finde ich schwammig, denn sie zeigt auch nicht die Intention des Urhebers. Ich werde auf jeden Fall meinen Genehmigungstext daraufhin noch einmal ändern und bemerken, dass bei Änderungen zumindest gefragt wird.--XRay ^talk 18:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

File:MG PA 6 Race, 1300 cm³, Bj. 1936 (2008-06-28 Sp).jpg

This car should not be associated with any Wikipedia article on MG cars. The car in the image is assembled from components of various models. Displaying this picture in Wikipedia is very bad for Wikipedia's reputation for reliability. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 07:08, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

It is not unusual that racing cars contain additional parts and that they are not identical with the series. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

This seems to be a mongrel of various modified parts of MG and other manufacturers' cars. It is a "race car" just because someone, not MG, gave it that name maybe 70 years after its components were made. It cannot appear here as a real MG, to my mind it can appear here as a special if it has an adequate explanation as to exactly what it is.

What is it? It is most certainly not what you have been claiming it to be (making MG people laugh at Wikipedia!) Eddaido (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

I did not claim anything but I gave back what the owner of this car and the organizer of the historical race at Nürburgring in 2008 said. If you will now more please look at www.damc05.de. There you probably will find an address for your questions or to submit your great knowledge about MG. I am not interested to discuss with you any longer. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 23:14, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Bilder Fahrerlager Nürburgring

Lieber Lothar Spurzem, ich war so frei, zwei Bilder der m.E. schlichtweg phänomenalen Nürburgring-Auswahl für die Dokumentation des alten Fahrerlagers in KuLaDig unter http://www.kuladig.de/Objektansicht.aspx?extid=O-83857-20140121-2 zu verwenden (ohne weitere Bearbeitung o.ä.). Ganz herzlichen Dank dafür, diese zeitgeschichtlich wertvollen Dokumente hier anzubieten! Eifeljanes (talk) 08:12, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, es freut mich, dass Dir die Bilder gefallen. Viele Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:59, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive 2⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Spurzem,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Standard, Bj. 1971 (Sp 2014-06-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 8 (Sp 2014-06-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support DoF may be better, but IMO still QI. --XRay 17:14, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault Sport Spider (Sp 2014-06-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 04:41, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Scirocco GTX, Bj. 1984 (Sp 2014-06-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph 1800 Roadster, Bj. 1947 (2014-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW 1302 (Sp 2014-06-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 21:14, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 200 D, Bj. 1967 (W 110).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 20:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unimog S 404 (Sp 2014-06-15).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Rekord P 1, Bj. 1958 (2014-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality, even considering the moving subject. --Livioandronico2013 18:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Karmann Ghia, Typ 34, Bj. 1969, Heck (Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergkapelle Kärlich (2006-04-28 Spu).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please, add more specific categories --Poco a poco 14:58, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Olympia Rekord, Bj. 1955 (2014-06-15 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 10:37, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fiat 500 Cabrio, Bj. 2009 (2009-07-23) ret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:17, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph TR 4A (Sp 2014-06-15 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lok 01 118 in Karden (2010-04-03 92).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pity it’s so noisy. Can you do anything about that? --Kreuzschnabel 19:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)  Weak support Noise is not an issue for me. There is lack of some fine detail, probably because of the lenses. Nevertheless it's good enough for me. --Iifar 17:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lok 01 1066 in Koblenz (2010-04-03 74).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Noisy, and perspective correction needed (see buildings on the edges in background) --Kreuzschnabel 19:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC) Done. -- Spurzem 16:36, 15 August 2014 (UTC)  Support For me is ok. --Livioandronico2013 19:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG TF, 1500 cm³, 55 PS, Bj. 1954 (2008-07-12 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice car. Please add an english description. --XRay 13:18, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 220, 1951-1954 (2008-07-12) kl.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heinkel Tourist A0 (2008-05-21) 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the fine magenta fringes (see note) --Cccefalon 10:07, 22 August 2014 (UTC) Done. Will say: I tried to do so. -- Spurzem 10:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel Kadett A, Bj. 1964 (2014-06-15 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:24, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goliath GP 1100 (2007-09-08 2616).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Case International 1056 XL 2006-07-20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 17:26, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goliath GD 750 (2014-08-29 6607).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 04:07, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isab Cabrio (2014-08-29 6584).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Livioandronico2013 17:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella 4-tür (2014-08-29 6621).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Severe CA in the background but main object well depicted --Kreuzschnabel 02:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgw Isabella, B'Neuenahr (2014-08-29 6674).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 02:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgw Isabella, Bj. 1959, Bad Neuenahr (2014-08-29 6701).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 02:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgw Isabella Kombi (2014-08-29 6570).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:53, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lloyd Alexander TS (2014-08-29 6671).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Dnalor 01 06:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella, Bj. vor 1957 (2014-08-31 6865).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some visible overexposure at the buffer bar (unavoidable here), nonetheless QI imho. Einige überbelichtete Teile an der Stoßstange, ist hier aber kaum zu vermeiden. --Tuxyso 21:51, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lloyd LP 400, Bj. 1955 (2014-08-31 6837 b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:08, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella Coupé (2014-08-29 6645).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward B 1500 1954-1960 (2014-08-31 6870).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 21:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Hansa 2400 II (2014-08-31 6816).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:00, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lloyd LS 600 (2014-08-31 6797).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI--Lmbuga 09:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella, Bj. 1957-58 (2014-08-31 6793).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:38, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella (2014-08-31 6851).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now. --JLPC 21:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella (2014-08-31 6799).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isab Coupé Cabrio, Bj. 1957 (2014-08-31 6784).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward P 100 (2014-08-31 6852).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Review

Hellow

Please, could you check (review) the upper right corner of the photo File:Borgward Isabella Coupé (2014-08-29 6638).JPG promoved by me to QI? I think that it needs a crop.

Nice picture, nice pictures. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 08:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

See also File:Borgward Isab Coupé Cabrio (2014-08-29 6592).JPG. I have said in QIC that the photo has a white border--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 08:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. The Coupé … 2014-08-29 6592 is tighter cropped now so that the white border ist deleted. But at the file … 6638 I can not a lack. Kindest regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lloyd Alexander TS (2014 -08-29 6663).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella Coupé (2014-08-29 6638).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 22:25, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella Coupé (2014-08-29 6646).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but please have a look to my note, and add the {retouched} template in the file page...--Jebulon 15:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC) Sorry, but it would not be good for the photo to add the retouched stout lady. ;-) -- Spurzem 12:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC) Retouching is revised now. -- Spurzem 15:31, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella, Bj. 1959 (2014-08-29 6571).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:40, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goliath Goli (2014-08-29 6605).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella (2014-08-29 6580) Bandtacho ab 1957 .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella TS, Bj. 1959 (2014-08-29 6642).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 18:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isab Coupé Cabrio (2014-08-29 6592).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Done.It should be better now. -- Spurzem 10:48, 7 September 2014 (UTC) Better, but I just saw another problem: small white border on the top and left side of the photo. Please, crop it out--Lmbuga 08:24, 8 September 2014 (UTC) Done. -- Spurzem 16:12, 8 September 2014 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:53, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isabella Coupé (2014-08-29 6613).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bad Neuenahr, Thermal-Badehaus (2014-08-30 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not leveled, should be easily fixable --MB-one 19:13, 3 September 2014 (UTC) Done. -- Spurzem 21:33, 3 September 2014 (UTC) Now QI --MB-one 15:52, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Unbekannter Oldtimer - lohnt ein Upload?

Hallo Lothar! Als bekannter Autospezialist wende ich mich einfach mal direkt an dich: Ich habe kürzlich einen unbekannten Oldtimer in Holland fotografiert. Nun meine Frage an dich: Um was für ein Auto handelt es sich genau? Lohnt ein Upload oder gibt es genug Fotos vom dem Wagen? Preisverdächtig ist das Foto sicher nicht, aber wenn es nützlich ist würde ich es hochladen. Es muss sich wohl um einen Ford handeln. Danke schon mal für deine Hilfe:

• Zwei Fotos eines unbekannten Ford-Oldtimer

Hallo, mit amerikanischen Autos kenne ich mich so gut wie überhaupt nicht aus. Am besten lädst Du die Bilder hoch und fragst hier, ob jemand den Wagen kennt. Freundliche Grüße -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:53, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Danke Lothar, ich habe es mal an die passende Stelle eingestellt. Danke schon mal für deine Hilfe. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borgward Isab Cabrio (2014-08-29 6592).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 16:55, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph Spitfire IV (2014-09-13 7035).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 22:57, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurner RS (2014-09-13 6992 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 17:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Sport-Prinz (2014-09-13 6980).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Lewis Hulbert 17:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Sport-Prinz, Prinz-IV-Basis (2014-09-13 7023 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 356 A (2014-09-13 7068 Sp).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MG A Roadster (2014-09-13 7150).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Austin-Healey 3000 (2014-09-13 7196).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:45, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Opel 1,2 Liter, Bj. 1932 (2014-09-13 7091).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK --JLPC 18:15, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Karmann Ghia Cabrio (2014-09-13 7155).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thurner RS (2014-09-13 7033 Sp) Front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:34, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Typ DA 4, Bj. 1931 (2014-09-13 6985 Sp) Heck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Typ DA 4, Bj. 1931 (2014-09-13 7088 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU Max, Bj. 1956 (2014-09-13 7015).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Done. -- Spurzem 15:45, 15 September 2014 (UTC) Support Thank you.--ArildV 21:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 75-5 (2014-09-13 7126b).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:41, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 220 W 180 (2014-09-13 7000).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Renault 4 CV (2014-09-13 7057) Front.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but composition: Lower left corner should be cropped IMO--Lmbuga 23:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Done. -- Spurzem 07:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC) Thanks. Much better. Good quality--Lmbuga 22:27, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goggomobil Coupé (2014-09-03 7051) Seite.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment CAs (see note). QI for me if you fix them--Lmbuga 23:36, 14 September 2014 (UTC) Done. -- Spurzem 07:21, 15 September 2014 (UTC)  Support Much better. Good for me--Lmbuga 22:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! VW Karmann Ghia (2014-09-13 7139).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:41, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU-Fiat Jagst, Bj. 1958 (2014-09-13 7157).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:41, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goggomobil Coupé (2014-09-13 7181).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:41, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porsche 914 (2014-09-13 7130).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good but you should remove the part indicated in the note --Livioandronico2013 19:53, 16 September 2014 (UTC) This are flowers at the border of the road. Perhaps it would be good to have more of them. -- Spurzem 06:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Ok --Livioandronico2013 11:49, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Triumph Spitfire IV (2014-09-13 7041) Heck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW Typ DA 4, Bj. 1931 (2014-09-13 7097 Sp).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Yellow at the right is a little bit disturbing.) --XRay 19:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hansa 1100, Bj. 1959 (2014-08-31 6769).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NSU 201 OSL, Bj. 1936 (2014-09-13 7077).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz 220 W 187 (2014-09-13 6986).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality but the magenta channel needs to be reduced. I will add some notes where I see too much magenta yet. --Cccefalon 15:45, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Done. Thank you. Please look now. -- Spurzem 16:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC) That's it. Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:00, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BMW R 60-2 (2014-09-13 7063) Motor.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)