Sismarinho

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sismarinho!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 07:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

File:CurtHennigScottHall.png

File:CurtHennigScottHall.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

4ing (talk) 18:53, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of properly tagged images

Hello. Ad [1]: Please don't tag properly tagged images for speedy deletion. File File:Juraj Kemka Zuzana Sebova 2016-01 Kristalove kridlo 2015 a.jpg is (successfully confirmed!) CC-BY image from Flickr [2] and file File:Juraj Kemka 2016-01 Kristalove kridlo 2015 a.jpg is cropped version of the first... --Teslaton (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Demande de suppression d'une image

Cher Sismarinho,

Tout d'abord je te remercie de veiller à la qualité de Commons. Ce qui t'a amené à demander la suppression de cette image : File:Diffusion de tracts pour le Carnaval de Paris 2016 - Photo prise le 31 janvier 2016.jpg au motif qu'elle serait une photo souvenir personnelle et n'aurait donc pas sa place sur la base Commons.

Elle en donne l'impression si on n'est pas spécialiste de l'histoire du Carnaval de Paris. Celui-ci a disparu durant une cinquantaine d'années et a débuté sa renaissance en 1993. Sur la photo figurent trois personnes qui jouent un rôle significatif dans cette renaissance. A gauche Isabelle est un des photographes les plus importants du Carnaval, à droite Etiennise est une des pionnière de la renaissance du Carnaval de Paris auquel elle participe régulièrement depuis 1998. Et au centre il s'agit de Basile Pachkoff, responsable du Carnaval de Paris, initiateur de sa renaissance et historien de cette fête. La photo illustre un moment de la préparation du Carnaval de Paris 2016. Elle ne montre pas la réunion de simples participants, mais celle d'acteurs importants engagés dans la renaissance du Carnaval de Paris. C'est pourquoi je suis d'avis de la conserver sur la base Commons et ne pas la supprimer.

Voilà, je t'ai donné mes raisons. A présent, à toi de décider si cette photo doit disparaître ou non de la base Commons.

Bien cordialement.

--Basilou (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Perro jr.jpg

Ouai je sais comment ça marche. Les photos sont déjà sur commons et utiliséés sur les pages wikipedia anglaises.

Bonne soirée --Cpc02 (talk) 22:11, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

License reviewer

Bonjour, je ne sais pas à quoi se réfère ta remarque sur des copyvios, je ne cherchais pas à te fustiger publiquement, et te prie de croire que je suis navré que tu aies pu imaginer que tel n'était pas le cas. Cordialement, — Racconish^☎ 11:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear Sismarinho,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:43, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

En nombre de PHOTOMAN

Hola: Escribo en nombre de PHOTOMAN ya que es relativamente nuevo y fui yo el que le convenció para subir fotos a a Commons. No suele mirar su página de discusión, sobre todo porque desconoce el inglés y lo que le dicen. Solo se dedica a sacar fotos y subirlas a Commons. Me pidió que preguntara el motivo del borrado de una serie de fotos "Kedada Urrez Campagnolo 2012" el 24 February 2016. Ha pasado tiempo pero te agradecería me dijeras algo a mi para trasladárselo a él. Me parece importante saber el porqué ya que si ha hacho algo incorrecto, cosa que desconoce, se lo diga yo para que no vuelva a tropezar en la misma piedra. Muchas gracias. Saludos.Adolfobrigido (talk) 21:10, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

@Adolfobrigido and PHOTOMAN: Lo siento Google Translate : Hola , he considerado que una parte de las importaciones de Photoman han identificado los bienes comunes de la regla Commons:PORN.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 04:49, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour à nouveau: Désolé, Google est également. Il doit y avoir une erreur parce que Photoman n'a soulevé que des images du cyclisme. Il est une personne très sérieuse et très responsable. Je pouvais voir les images? Avez-vous pu vérifier votre nouveau?. Il est qu'il semble tout à fait impossible. Il doit être une erreur. J'attends de tes nouvelles. Salutations.Adolfobrigido (talk) 15:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

@Adolfobrigido and PHOTOMAN: Es la cantidad de imágenes que problema. Creo que tenemos suficientes fotos para ilustrar el ciclismo.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 05:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Soa Amin with Abdullah The Butcher.jpg

---

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Soa Amin with Abdullah The Butcher.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:48, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

@Magog the Ogre: I wish to use it for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SantanaGarrettEntrance.png but this doesn't work.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:57, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Uncheck the box that says "directly transfer." That is broken even if the text generator isn't. Unfortunately, the tool maintainer isn't active enough to fix it. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Sismarinho, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Cropping images

I had to review your cropped image File:Road Warrior Animal cropped.jpg. By way of information for the future, when you want to crop an image I suggest you use the CropTool that can be activated in your commons Preferences, under Gadgets. The CropTool will then appears in the left side of your screen. It saves everyone a lot of time because it transfers all the correct and appropriate information into the cropped image, such as source, license, author, etc. It even leaves a backlink to the original and visa versa so long as the original has been positively reviewed. That way all the proper information is there and does not need to be manually reviewed again. If you are just cropping a small bit of the image like a frame, you can decide to overwrite the original image but for more major crops, like the one you did, you should upload the copped version as a separate new image, but you have a choice. I hope you can see how everyone can save time and frustration by using CropTool. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 15:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Sismarinho,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Gilbert Meet&Greet.jpg

---

Thank you for uploading images from Wikipedia to Commons. However, the file you uploaded, File:Gilbert Meet&Greet.jpg appears to be a scaled down version of the version on Wikipedia. Please reupload the full version of the image. You can then tag the scaled down version with {{duplicate}} to have it deleted. Consider using CommonsHelper to provide the correct image description and licensing tags. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:David Flair with Paul Billets (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:David Flair with Paul Billets (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:David Flair with Paul Billets (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

BevinKacon (talk) 11:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Permission Granted

I did get permission. Not my problem you don't see that. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!}

File:'Free Concerts' Radio Dealer poster (1922).jpg]

Your inital speedy nomination was declined and a subsequent DR, in which you curiously did not particulate, found no valid reason for deletion. Nevertheless, you have again added an identical, spurious speedy request. I also note you have been warned about inappropriate speedy tagging before. Please discontinue adding inappropriate speedy requests, as it is disruptive and may result in a block. Эlcobbola _talk 20:55, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

(Sorry french) Pouvez vous penser une seconde que j'ai juste oublié que j'ai auparavant fait cela ?--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 21:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sandra Reehs

Bonjour, Merci de ne pas créer de demande de suppression sans raison valable. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 05:14, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

@Yann: Alors :

1. L'erreur est humaine. Tu fais et tu feras des erreurs que ce soit dans la vie ou sur Commons.
2. Si avoir fait une demande de suppression sans raison valable t'emmerde (ce qui semble être le cas) tu n'a qu'à demander mon blocage.

Bisous.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Andregiantmugshot.jpg

File:Andregiantmugshot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GMG^talk 18:16, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Madusa Monster truck 2009.jpg

File:Madusa Monster truck 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TaurusEmerald (talk) 22:11, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

grizzled young veterans

hi i received a message this morning that i violated a copyright use for the james drake.jpg and zack gibson.jpg because it wasn't a "free use". when i came across the jpg's online i asked the owner(alice) who takes great photos. if i could use the photos under her consent and she said yes it would be a pleasure to use one of her pictures. i don't know why the pictures would be taken down when i also gave a link to where the pictures came from cause it wasn't my picture but someone else's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatprowrestlingnovaig (talk • contribs) 16:22, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

My images

I’m not trying to illegally take copywrited images off the internet. I just found them on Flickr with the appropriate Creative Commons license LaDanian1000000 (talk) 22:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, but there were uploaded to flickr from some malicious third party (see the spam link next to each upload). --Polarlys (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Obvious copyrights violations

Please report them as such ({{Copyvio}}) instead of regular deletion requests, so they will be removed faster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: my bad. I was too quick with perform back task.--Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Please don't worry, it was not big problem. Deletion requests pages may be long and such cases had less chances to be discovered. In this particular case I watched deletion requests because of previous problematic files I nominated for deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wanchan2020 (talk) 20:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RadioKAOS (talk) 01:54, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

~~~~ RadioKAOS (talk) 13:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Removing messages in talk pages

We aren't suppost to remove our messages on talk pages. If you want to "remove" your statement you should use <s>*text*</s> and then write under why you don't agree with that statement anymore. :) // Kakan spelar (talk) 17:41, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

(Sorry french)  Done et c'est ma dernière contribution ici avant un bon moment. Allez bonne soirée quand même. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 18:50, 9 October 2024 (UTC)