Lion de Belfort

edit

Bravo pour la photo : j'ai modifié l'illustration de La Sculpture française du XIXe siècle en la découvrant. Merci. PRA 07:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:MuseeDOrsay.jpg, which was nominated by Benh at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MuseeDOrsay.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Simonizer 23:01, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:PanoMontBlancHDR.jpg

edit

I have nominated your image in Quality image candidates. It is a remarkable work, congratulations. J'espère bien que vous soyez un peu moins honteux pour pouvoir participer avec plein droit à COM:FPC et COM:QIC. Salut, Alvesgaspar 22:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PanoMontBlancHDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:MontBlanc2c.jpg, which was nominated by Benh at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MontBlanc2c.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Simonizer 22:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:AiguilleDuMidiTM.jpg

edit

Your photo Image:AiguilleDuMidiTM.jpg's category Creatde with Hugin is red. Can you fix it? Thanks --Beyond silence   08:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:PanoMontBlancHDR edit 1.jpg, which was nominated by Alvesgaspar at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:PanoMontBlancHDR edit 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Simonizer 22:03, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

FP promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Palais Luxembourg Sunset Edit.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Palais Luxembourg Sunset Edit.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Simonizer 23:07, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

FP promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:AiguilleDuMidiTM.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:AiguilleDuMidiTM.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Benchat 09:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Rogers Center-restitched.jpg

edit

Hey would you mind if I cloned out the cable in Rogers Center-restitched.jpg? I'm never sure what proper etiquette is. Great work on that BTW. JaGa 05:48, 8 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CathedraleBeziers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Rogers Center-restitched.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rogers Center-restitched.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

--Simonizer 10:01, 20 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CygneVaires.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NotreDameDeParis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP nomination Female_Mallard_Duck_Rest.jpg

edit

Hi, I just wanted you to know I've followed some advice I got and uploaded a new version of the image that is much better. I dont want to botter you with that, but maybe it will make you reconsider your choise. Good day. ;) Acarpentier 17:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CopalmeDAmerique.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! LionDeBelfort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:CygneVaires.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:CygneVaires.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Benh 22:14, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007

edit

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:27, 14 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

FP promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:ColapteryxVirgo.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ColapteryxVirgo.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Alvesgaspar 23:36, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BrehatE.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great --Simonizer 16:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ChateauDeRentilly.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very well done --Massimo Catarinella 16:07, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CathedraleEtVieuxPontBeziers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments good details & composition --Ianare 04:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Le problème

edit

Salut Nicolas.

Dans ce cas, je crois, la seule chose qu'on peut faire est de demander un checkuser. You should list the suspected users and ask Herby (or Lar or SB Johnny). He'll know what to do. Lycaon (talk) 22:02, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Guano

edit

Superb image. Would you like to sign? Durova (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 


 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:DefecatingSeagull.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DefecatingSeagull.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

Lycaon (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

À propos du goéland

edit

J'avais vu que ce n'était pas toi qui avais fait la deuxième nomination, la remarque ne visait pas à t'accuser de quoi que ce soit, c'était juste pour informer de l'état de fait ! --Eusebius (talk) 19:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Picture of the Year/2008/Preparation

edit

We are starting the discussion on POTY 2008. Would you like to join? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:CopalmeDAmerique.jpg

edit

Dear Sanchezn

I have seen your picture

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:CopalmeDAmerique.jpg

It is such a beautiful autumn tree! Therefore I would like to ask you permission to print this picture in our Paracelsus magazine. Paracelsus magazine is a product of global cooperation, with people from Europe, North and South America, and India volunteering their time and working without pay. The objective of the magazine is to blend ancient and modern wisdom of medicine and holistic healing. The magazine is published monthly in three different languages: German, Spanish, and English; it is read all on every continent of the world. It reaches physicians, alternative practitioners and ordinary people. C Although we sell the magazine, we are a non profit organisation and the printing coasts are hardly covered. Would you be so generous and give us your permission to print this photograph? We thank you in advance for your consideration and reply and send you our very best wishes. Anna Beutler [email protected] PS: For more information please visit our homepage: www.paracelsus-center.ch

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FortDuGuesclin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Richard Bartz 13:31, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Photographers Blackbelt

edit
 
 
THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
J'ai l'honneur de vous décerner la Photographers Blackbelt (ceinture noire des photographes) pour vos photos remarquables et excellentes.
--ComputerHotline (talk) 07:39, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg

edit
 
File:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−

Sreejith K (talk) 13:23, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

The website you're talking about (http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/samoylovsw/view/331580/?page=0) is obviously the copyright violator. Not the contrary. sanchezn (talk) 13:39, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I totally agree with you, but since the website was not in English, I wanted to cross check with some other user. No offence meant. --Sreejith K (talk) 13:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:ChateauDeRentilly.jpg

edit

We wanted to let you know that we've used one of your pictures in a project of ours: http://litpics.tumblr.com/post/14425284315/lit-the-mirror-of-literature-amusement-and

We created a computer program to generate random pairings of sentences from public domain texts and public domain / creative commons images. Some of the pictures we've selected come from the Wikipedia Commons. All the pictures we select ourselves, but the pairings and the text are random. Of these pairings that are generated, we only post the most interesting combinations.

We welcome any feedback about our site.

Thanks for sharing your pictures,
Samantha and Patrick

blog: http://litpics.tumblr.com/
email: litpicsblog gmail.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/litpics

Litpics (talk) 23:20, 20 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Colouring_pencils_crop.jpg

edit
 
File:Colouring_pencils_crop.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Japs 88 (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Photo usage

edit

Hi, I've been working on a small game built around animal quizzes and I wanted to let you know I've used one of your pictures.

I found your picture here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:CygneVaires.jpg

And I attributed the picture like this: Sanchezn with this link: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Sanchezn and also added a link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en

I hope you're happy with it, please let me know if this is not the case. You can find the game here: http://apps.facebook.com/animalalbum Or through here: http://www.facebook.com/pages/AnimalAlbum/156339584490672

Kind regards, Garfunkel Jansen (talk) 11:13, 7 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Thanks for taking the picture and making it available.

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neuschwanstein-c1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:26, 5 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

edit
 
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Swallow flying drinking.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Swallow flying drinking.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

 

/FPCBot (talk) 06:06, 14 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Signpost inquiry

edit

Nicolas, fairly urgent emailed Signpost inquiry sent yesterday. If you responded (by email, please), we could quote you. Tony1 Tony (talk) 13:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

edit
 
Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

  #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

  Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:43, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swallow flying drinking.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. But why do you nominate FPs to QI? --Podzemnik 21:19, 13 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Support Good quality. --Chenspec 09:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I do not have any specific reason -- Eatcha 19:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

edit
 
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North side of Orsay Museum building, 4 August 2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
  Support Good quality. Maybe a bit too much sharpening, but IMHO really good for a 2007 photo. --Aristeas 18:34, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your fotos

edit

hello,

i used one of your fotos in one of my art-projects. you find it here:

deadline bis übermorgen - LmaA

Feel free to listen to my playlist. :)

Thank you for your very good foto.

Best regards Hilmar — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2A02:8108:9640:1ED4:C9DD:3FC2:44A1:8DF3 (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2022 (UTC)Reply