SPUI~commonswiki

Please comment on my English Wikipedia talk page.

Mapping Help? Image:Amtrak California map.svg

I'm looking to do some mapping like this in the near future. What program did you use to make this map? Would you recommend it? Thanks! --24.24.178.167 18:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:US1.svg images

Could you please mark these images as redundant to your Image:US 1.svg images? --EugeneZelenko 04:02, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

I asked bot operators help in Commons:Village pump#Bot help needed. If you'll do this manually please remove this topic for Village pump. Thank you. --EugeneZelenko 04:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, if I hurt your feelings. I simply misunderstood your first sentence (Sorry, I can't do it.). --EugeneZelenko 15:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

deleted, restored, deleted.

You didn't provide a reason for deletion, but because it was you, I deleted it anyway. After I saw your page at English I thought you were simply "packing up your toys and going home" so I restored it for you. Now I know better, and it's been deleted again. Bas ^parler _voir 00:42, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

California highway shields

Please note that there is already other series of SVG images. See Image:CA 3.svg and other. Please mark one of the series as redundant. --EugeneZelenko 16:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, also, some shields haven't been created yet, but they're not typical shields. 305, 395, 399, 405, 466, 505, 580, 780, 805, 880 and 980 do not have CA SR shields, while for example 6, 80, 280 and etc., do. After that spectacle with Image:I-80 Chadbourne.jpg, even if that was a mistake, maybe creating those shields would be okay. --Geopgeop 01:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Your tags

Hi SPUI. Sorry, yesterday I changed your tag, for don't appear your images in the category on All right released. Now are sub category of PD-self. I made this because I think that it is your will, but if not, change it like you want, but don't put another tag into your tag. Bye --RED DEVIL 666 17:56, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Well, it's not like there's any difference, but it doesn't matter to me. --SPUI 18:03, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image:RI 195 special.svg

Is that what the route used to look like? WOW! Are there any real pictures that have these shields? --Ltljltlj 00:31, 03 April 2006 (UTC)

Florida County Roads

I see you have started a Florida County Roads category already. You want to merge it with my Florida County Routes category which I have no problem with since I plan on switching the shields with the ones that you have uploaded. I just have one question, is there a difference between a county route and a county road cause a see that you uploaded some county road shields without a county name on them. --Ltljltlj 23:35, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Clearview fonts

Have you been able to insert the Clearview fonts onto an SVG? Because I have no idea how to do it. --Ltljltlj 00:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Nevada shields

SPUI, before you make the Nevada shields and upload them here, might I try one upload myself? I tried figuring out Inkscape, and I guess I'm okay with it. So I'm uploading Image:Nevada 444.svg, the example route from the PDF I emailed you. Let me see what you think about it. --Geopgeop 13:07, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Ehh, it's obvious as to what I forgot to do in the SVG... --Geopgeop 13:11, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes! Third times the charm. --Geopgeop 13:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

You know what? I think I got the hang of this. I know I asked you to make the shields, but now I want to do them, please. You can go ahead with the request for the other states' shields, but I want to do Nevada. --Geopgeop 06:35, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Image deletion warning

Template:RIGIS has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion on its entry.

Thuresson 18:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Template:RIGIS

Hi - it seems to me that the license given by RIGIS is non-free. You said at Template:Deletion_requests#Template:RIGIS that maps derived from the original data are covered by a separate license... well, which one, then? Everything I find on the website has the "no unauthorized distribution" clause. I believe it's necessary to get an explicite statements from RIGIS disclaiming all rights to maps derived from their data (even SVG maps?!), if we want to keep the images.

If there's need for discussion, let's do that at COM:DEL - I just post here because the deletion request has been inactive for some time now. -- Duesentrieb^(?!) 13:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Image Modification Request

See Image_talk:I-75_US_224_interchange.png. Thanks! --Thisisbossi 21:46, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:1888 OCRR.gif

Pay attention to copyright

Image:1888 OCRR.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Patricia.fidi 14:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup tag

Hi I saw that you added a {{Cleanup}} tag to Image:LA 611.PNG, you did however not specify what the problem with the image was. /Lokal_Profil 03:25, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Meat cleavers.svg

Please rename. The name is incorrect and misleading. --AtonX 14:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Amtrak schematic

I re-downloaded your file Amtrak_schematic.png at half resolution and this allowed the thumbnails to be generated correctly. The new download is Amtrak_schematic3.png and the thumbnail is now used on Amtrak and Amtrak routes Wikipages. I hope this is OK with you. Ralphbk 19:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:NYC subway simplified map.png

Pay attention to copyright

Image:NYC subway simplified map.png has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sea Beach Line 1.gif

Pay attention to copyright

Image:Sea Beach Line 1.gif has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs|Flickr review status nom) 19:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Sea Beach Line 1.gif

Image deletion warning

Image:Sea Beach Line 1.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 09:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Corrupt images

I came across Image:New Jersey railroad map.png and Image:Amtrak schematic.png and noticed they are corrupt and will not display, so I tagged them for speedy deletion. But after clicking on the maps, I see that they are very detailed and should be kept on commons. I removed the speedy deletion tag, and was hoping that you could fix the images so they can be properly displayed here and not deleted. There may be other corrupt images out there, so I'd check and make sure those don't get deleted as well. –Dream out loud 17:41, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

As per Commons:First steps/Quality and description#Images, "As of October 19th, 2005 the MediaWiki software can’t handle PNGs larger than exactly 12,500,000 pixels (12,500.000 kilopixels, 12.500000 megapixels, 12,207.031 kibipixels, or 11.920929 mebipixels)—3535×3536 pixels square, 4082×3061 pixels in the 4:3 ratio, or 4497×2779 pixels in the golden ratio—but otherwise images in such high resolutions are fine."   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 20:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cleveland Rapid map.svg

Image deletion warning

Image:Cleveland Rapid map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Wizardman 15:30, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

• I’ve fixed it – and BTW subservient plea for mercy that I’ve had changed your code without your previous approval... TNX! --FSHL 20:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:C-D road.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:C-D road.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 12:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Putnam Division map.png

Image deletion warning

Image:Putnam Division map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from DRBot. (Stop bugging me!) 02:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

I relisted it because it is no longer in use, and the replacement now actually exists on Commons.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Interstate_10_(California).svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Interstate_10_(California).svg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 14:52, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Federal Forest Highway 13

Any chance you can create and upload a shield for FFH-13? I'd like to add it to my M-28 junction list. --Imzadi1979 21:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Springfield,_Massachusetts_1955_Yellow_Book.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Springfield,_Massachusetts_1955_Yellow_Book.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Mrmariokartguy (talk) 02:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Image:Springfield, Massachusetts 1955 Yellow Book.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Springfield, Massachusetts 1955 Yellow Book.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Mrmariokartguy (talk) 02:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Please link images

---

Hello SPUI~commonswiki!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

• Image:Bristol.png is uncategorized since 27 November 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 10:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 19.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 61 close.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:No image tall.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 7.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Roxbury Parting Stone right.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 4 close.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Roxbury Parting Stone left.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 61.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Lower Post Road MP 3.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Lower Post Road MP 5.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 59.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Watertown Path sign.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Loony.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Roxbury Parting Stone top.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 4.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Framingham Alternate MP 24.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Lower Post Road MP 5 close.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Framingham Alternate MP 23.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 62.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Framingham Alternate MP 24 close.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Framingham Alternate MP 28.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:No image wide.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Roxbury Parting Stone.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Lower Post Road MP 3 close.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 59 top.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Framingham Alternate MP 18.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Framingham Alternate MP 21.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Framingham Alternate MP 27.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Upper Post Road MP 5.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Eisenhower Interstate System.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

File:BMT map.png

Hello SPUI, please load up a smaller version of this picture. With more than 12,5 mio. px it's too big for direct showing or rendering. greeting -- Ra'ike T C 09:52, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

• File:Pawtucket1961.jpg
• File:New York to Stratford page 1.jpg
• File:New York to Stratford page 3.jpg
• File:Harvard Branch Railroad.jpg
• File:New York to Stratford page 5.jpg
• File:New York to Stratford page 7.jpg
• File:New York to Stratford page 2.jpg
• File:Rhode Island turnpikes.jpg
• File:New York to Stratford page 4.jpg
• File:G&CU depot.jpg
• File:New York to Stratford page 6.jpg

BotMultichillT 21:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bristol.png

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bristol.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

malo (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Map of current Interstates.svg

I noticed that Interstate 69 in Indiana isn't on it. Construction on the Southern Indiana extension began on June 15, 2008 and is now more than a mile into the new route. Rhatsa26X (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

File:US_17-1.svg

File:US_17-1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Imzadi 1979 → 00:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

File:US_17-1.svg

File:US_17-1.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Imzadi 1979 → 00:03, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Toll Texas 183A.svg

According to the Texas Highway Designation Files, Highway 183A is not actually a Texas state highway. It was given that number by the Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, and therefore has a different shield.

File:Yield sign.svg

File:Yield sign.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 21:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Stop sign MUTCD.svg

File:Stop sign MUTCD.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 21:18, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Eisenhower Interstate System.png

File:Eisenhower Interstate System.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 22:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Eisenhower Interstate System.png

File:Eisenhower Interstate System.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Imzadi 1979 → 23:43, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Dothan.png

File:Dothan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

moogsi (blah) 03:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Bays

Bays has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Skinsmoke (talk) 09:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Boston and Worcester side.png

File:Boston and Worcester side.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Suspension_bridges

Suspension bridges has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

62.178.125.252 21:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

File:MA Route 0.svg

File:MA Route 0.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

80.5.67.21 13:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

File:1948 Allegheny Portage Railroad.jpg

File:1948 Allegheny Portage Railroad.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

File:BwyWalk0505 Station7thAve.jpg

File:BwyWalk0505 Station7thAve.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 20:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called SPUI. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name SPUI~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

22:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

05:17, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

U.S. Route shields

U.S. Route shields has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

216.220.90.98 18:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Oklahoma 74B.svg

File:Oklahoma 74B.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rschen7754 07:24, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Chicago top down view.png

This is an awesome map but some updates for 2016.

• The streets (S. Water, N. Westshore, E. Benton, N. Park) around Lake Shore East park is one-way counter-clock-wise, not clock-wise as it is currently marked in the graphic.
• The fence between Lower-Lower Wacker and N. Field from Lake Shore East park is now replaced by an impound lot. It may or may not be navigable depending on the city's use of the open area.

HTH --Pandaflex (talk) 03:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

File:No image tall.svg

File:No image tall.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Brobra694 (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

File:I-10 at Garfield Avenue.jpg

File:I-10 at Garfield Avenue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:16, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Michigan lefts.jpg

File:Michigan lefts.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 14:26, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Road_signs

Road signs has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Вадзім Медзяноўскі (talk) 15:27, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:Piers

Piers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 09:52, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:College_life

College life has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 09:26, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Category:Traffic_circles

Traffic circles has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

File:South Water Street.png

File:South Water Street.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 17:25, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Lechmere station original track diagram.png

File:Lechmere station original track diagram.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:12, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Category:Rapid_transit

Rapid transit has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Sbb1413 (he) (talk • contribs) 03:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

File:I-35.svg

File:I-35.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

RandomGamer6029 (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Orlando's Closest Beach.jpg

File:Orlando's Closest Beach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

File:BwyWalk0505 Station34thBroadway.jpg

File:BwyWalk0505 Station34thBroadway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:28, 25 September 2024 (UTC)