RhinoMind

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RhinoMind!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Kategorier

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hej. Hvorfor alle de mærkelige kategorier på dine uploadede billeder. Bemærk venligst kategori strukturen, ligesom dette ikke er en dansk side. Mvh. --Pixi Uno (talk) 17:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hej. Tak for kommentaren. Hvor "bemærker jeg kategori strukturen" henne? Jeg har givet mine uploadede billeder kategorier på både dansk og engelsk fordi jeg er aktiv begge steder og at de så kan bruges af begge steder. At du synes de er "mærkelige" er din personlige mening. Jeg vil gerne lære mere om de forskellige kategorier, hvor kan jeg lære om det? RhinoMind (talk) 19:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrol given

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 01:26, 26 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Deletion requests

Latest comment: 1 year ago18 comments9 people in discussion

File:Sølystgade 2.jpg

File:Sølystgade 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Túrelio (talk) 10:50, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Royal Casino 4.JPG

File:Royal Casino 4.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Túrelio (talk) 12:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Konen med Hønen.JPG Sculptor Aage Bruun Jespersen (b. 1929) seems to be still living. If you want to try to get a permission from him, please leave a notice. --Túrelio (talk) 13:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Bernhardt Jensen.JPG Sculptor Jan Balling seems to be still living.[1] If you want to try to get a permission from him, please leave a notice. --Túrelio (talk) 13:00, 9 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Vand Dragen 1.JPG

File:Vand Dragen 1.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

--Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 8 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Peter Sabroe.jpg

File:Peter Sabroe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Urbandweller (talk) 19:30, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Atomkraft? Nej tak.JPG

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Skole-kridt (slik).jpg

File:Skole-kridt (slik).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Josve05a (talk) 14:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Rød metal kunst.JPG

File:Rød metal kunst.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Fnielsen (talk) 11:01, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Strandbaren 1.JPG

File:Strandbaren 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Fnielsen (talk) 11:02, 24 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Øllebrød 2.jpg

File:Øllebrød 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

(t) Josve05a (c) 13:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Cobbled square and path..jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 03:27, 14 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Anettes Sandwich.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 15:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Døbefont (Ravnsbjergkirken).jpg

File:Døbefont (Ravnsbjergkirken).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Erik Heide is still alive, so the rights haven't expired yet.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

TherasTaneel (talk) 10:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Konen med Hønen.JPG

File:Konen med Hønen.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Aage Bruun Jespersen died in 2001, so not free from copyright yet.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

TherasTaneel (talk) 15:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Flodhest i sten (Aarhus).JPG

File:Flodhest i sten (Aarhus).JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Aage Bruun Jespersen died in 2001, so not free from copyright yet.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

TherasTaneel (talk) 15:36, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Christian X (Aarhus) 01.JPG

And also:

File:Christian X (Aarhus) 02.JPG

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Sømanden.jpg

File:Sømanden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Atomium

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

There is no non commercial use clause in Belgian copyright law so CC-BY-NC would make no difference.Geni (talk) 13:36, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is really true, it would make it easier to allow for one, if Wiki Commons allowed for non-commercial licenses in the first place. By the way, the possible Belgian prohibition of non-commercial publishing, has nothing to do with the FOPs of that country. RhinoMind (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

The prohibition of non-commercial publishing is just standard bern convention stuff. Even Napoleonic code countries tend not to produce copyright wavies outs that wide (the closest I'm aware of is South korea which had/has a very board opt out for educational use. Caused issues with text books). Commons and the wider wikimedia movement has very little influence on how countries chose to run their copyright system and allowing NC material would provide little incentive for reform.

Worse still "non-commercial" is legaly a very poorly defined concept. See for example the recent German ruling that basically decided that all forms of publication were commercial. While I expect that ruling to be appealed I can't predict which way the appeal will go and there are many many other grey areas around the term.Geni (talk) 15:37, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

FONA

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Er FONA ikke en pladebutik i Danmark? tsca (talk) 09:35, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Tsca: Hej. Nej det er en teknik- og multimedie-kæde. "Records" betyder de gammeldags vinyl-plader. De sælges ikke i FONA. Der er desværre ikke nogen shop-kategorier for FONA, men du kan lave en? Check deres hjemmeside først. RhinoMind (talk) 23:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Photo challenge/2014 - April - Food and drinks worldwide/Voting

Latest comment: 10 years ago12 comments3 people in discussion

In your voting here you have two images 3 points and one 2 points. This isn't a valid vote. Can you change to 3/2/1 points. I can't guess which you meant. Can you change your vote quicky as otherwise I may have to exclude all your votes from that theme. -- Colin (talk) 15:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Colin: Done. Thanks for your notice! RhinoMind (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

RhinoMind, I reverted your edit as it deleted a lot of content and undid updates. Please try again. Helen Online 09:22, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@HelenOnline: Strange. I didn't edit that page at all. Anyway, I have corrected my voting on this page also now, as originally encouraged by User:Colin RhinoMind (talk) 09:55, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I think it is ok now. You may have edited an earlier version dated when you first voted via Colin's link above, in which case it should have warned you: "You are editing a prior version of this page. If you save it, any changes made since this version will be removed." Helen Online 10:59, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oops sorry, I see you have now allocated one 3 star rating and two 2 star ratings. You need to allocate one 3 star rating, one 2 star rating and one 1 star rating. Helen Online 11:04, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@HelenOnline: Corrected. Hope it was the right page? Sorry for my errors. RhinoMind (talk) 13:49, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

RhinoMind, I'm still waiting for you to fix your vote per above. Please could you do it soon, otherwise I'll have to eliminate your votes from the count and just go with the others. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 11:32, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Colin: Well it would definitely help if you told me what page I am to edit! The links you provided was bullsh... RhinoMind (talk) 13:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I told you want page to edit, in the link that makes the header of this section. What is wrong with it? -- Colin (talk) 14:30, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Colin: I don't know, but something went wrong apparently. Maybe not your fault, I dont know. Anyway hope everything is ok now. RhinoMind (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks RhinoMind, I think it is fine now. You have to be careful not to edit an older version than the current version (assuming that is what happened here). Colin's link was a diff to show your historical edit but you need to open the current page to edit the current version. Helen Online 08:15, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

House of culture

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Even stranger, we have Category:Palaces of culture and Category:Houses of culture, which appear to be the same thing. in the US, we have "cultural centers" which are much more informally structured than in the communiist bloc. I think we need to merge the cats as you suggested, and further merge these two, and create a parallel "cultural center" for all the buildings around the world not part of the communist concept.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Mercurywoodrose: Hi and thanks for your thoughts on this! I really endorse a meta-category so to speak, a bit like what you are talking about. Just for the sake of simplicity, usefulness and an overview. However, I see no reason why various forms of cultural centers in different cultures, should be omitted from such a meta-category? Actually, I believe every kind of cultural center should be gathered and contained in such a category. The specific everyday structure of the centers, will be explained on the specific pages. Or perhaps in sub-categories if needed. Is this something you have thought deeply about? Do you have good explanations, as to why the cultural centres of the former Soviet Union, should not be contained in any meta-category?

I think "Cultural center" is a good name-choice for a meta-category, as it does not specify the type of the specific centers. The usual problem is, if we should use the British "centres" instead of the American "centers" if you know what I mean? :-) I am not aware of Wikipedias policies on this.

Hope to hear from you.

Btw. I think we should discourage the use of the word "communist", as this is a word with different meanings to different people.

RhinoMind (talk) 21:06, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

yes, we need a metacategory for all of them, "commie" or not, with definitions of each subgroup. "Cultural center" is a great neutral choice. as to whether it should be the british spelling: if we have many more such sites in either america or the british spelling world, choose that spelling for the category. it doesnt really matter though, for a culturally neutral term. policy is mostly around culturally specific articles, such as "oscar wilde" or "ernest hemingway" using their versions of english in their articles.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Great, thats something to progress from there.

I would have really liked to discuss the meaning and structure of various centers in different cultures. Because I personally needs some clarifications and because it will also ease the categorization further down the road. I am however taking a break from on-line activities, as I am getting really busy elsewhere at the moment. I just state these intentions so I/we can catch up on this issue later on. That is one of the comforting aspects of on-line editing; time is not your master to the same extent :-) RhinoMind (talk) 21:34, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I agree the word communist is completely inappropriate. just used for shorthand in this discussion. "second world", which is never used, would be more neutral. or just "soviet bloc" and "china".Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ole

Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Well, all i know is a search shows no works into english aside from "otto is a rhino: stories and drawings" ([2]), which is out of print and expensive. maybe someone would like to translate them? Rightscenter.com used to promote translation, but its long gone. getting publishing companies to move on an older childrens author is going to be very hard. you would need to make friends with a childrens book sales rep who is bilingual in danish, and get them to fall in love with his work. or an editor. I suspect the editors in new york like white wine-ship a scholastic editor a case of wine, perhaps?Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Mercurywoodrose: Great info! I have had big trouble finding proper databases to search for Danish-English translations in general. Another author was "Ebbe Kløvedal Reich", but there are plenty. My "best" solution turned out to be just Google, which is really not a very good solution after all.

I dont know how you did it Mercurywoodrose, but you guessed somehow, that I would personally like to translate some works! :-) It is true. First of all though, I was simply looking for already translated works, to fill in on Wikipedia articles and as a first-order investigation on which author was noteworthy and had notability. In the long run, I might get into some publishing also, as I am translating works into both English and Danish (back and forth) as a hobby of mine. I am working on translating "Lafacadio Hearn" into Danish fx. I think with todays technology I might be able publish them myself, if it ever gets to that. I use LaTeX, if you know that program? I dont think this will ever be a way to earn money for me - unfortunately -, so I have little aspirations to engage in the proper editing business. The future might turn out different of course, so thanks a lot for the advice, I didn't knew white-wine was such a treat in NY ... lol Cheers. RhinoMind (talk) 12:11, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

i used to know some people in the publishing business, but no longer do. I do remember that 2 canadian childrens book publishers seemed to be open to quirky, nonmainstream books, of which an old danish work would possibly fit their lists: firefly books [3][4] and Annick press[5], which has a Wikipedia article. I agree this might be a good time to self publish such a work, but getting the rights to translate would be tricky, as publishers hold onto them fiercely. you would have to write to the copyright holders of his works and find out if they are open to this. Its possible that they might be willing to look at a translation if done for free, and then decide if they wanted to pay you. thats speculation on my part, and i dont know enough about the copyright status of such a work to say if thats a risk.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I guess the copyright issue is a whole chapter of its own and even though it is probably the most important one, I haven't wrestled much with it yet. At the moment, I am just translating stuff occasionally for my own enjoyment and I am not even sure, if the quality of it will be acceptable for markets abroad. I much appreciate your input on relevant publishers and I will definitely look into it. I am not sure I will ever get to the business side of things, as it has never been a die hard goal for me to get there in the first place, but it is surely interesting to play with the thought of it, so who knows what might happen? If I was only to translate and publishers handled all the copyright issues, marketing and printing stuff it wouldn't be so hard... an interesting thought.

Besides, we dont make much white wine here in Denmark (or Scandinavia for that matter), but we happen to produce excellent cherry-wines.[6] It is not so well-known for some reason, and the quirkiness of it all might perhaps suit a few Canadian publishers...?RhinoMind (talk) 21:21, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Folkets_Hus,_Aarhus

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:Folkets_Hus,_Aarhus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Rudolph Buch (talk) 15:56, 6 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deletion frenzy

Latest comment: 10 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Where was the discussion about the deletion of this photo?

I know it was mentioned on File:Søystgade 2.jpg, but in the deleting-frenzy initiated there, there has never been given any reasons why this specific photo was or should be deleted.

The graffiti was (does not exist any more) painted in a place where graffiti is officially allowed. It can be debated if it is considered an artwork. I dont think so and would like to see the WP-police present good arguments that is was.

RhinoMind (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Above moved from File:Graffiti (wall peace).jpg by Jarekt (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

The discussion took place at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sølystgade 2.jpg --Jarekt (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Jarekt:

No.

Please read the discussion that you (and I myself!) are referring to. The files was never discussed prior to deletion.

To spell it out in capitals: The discussion was about the specific File:Sølystgade 2.jpg. The other 8 (!) files that User:Túrelio mentioned there, has never ever been discussed prior to their deletion and no arguments or reasons for their deletion was ever given or documented. Túrelio hints that they all fall in the same category as File:Sølystgade 2.jpg, but this is complete bullocks. Complete bullocks. I am not saying that all 8 files should be restored, I am first and foremost complaining about the complete lack of arguments and discussion prior to deletion. At least 2 of the files on Túrelios random black list, should indeed never have been deleted for quite clear reasons. I have now spend time putting these reasons up here: File talk:Graffiti (wall peace).jpg and here: File talk:Grundfos Kollegiet (detalje 1).JPG. Again.

I would like to discuss specific file-related details on the specific files own talk-pages, not here. Here on my talk page, we can discuss the violation of proper procedures in general, a very important issue.

If the sad procedures I have experienced here is becoming standard on WP, we have a very serious problem! I would certainly like to call attention to this problem.

RhinoMind (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

As if all this mess was not enough, you (Jarekt) completely deleted my complaints on File talk:Grundfos Kollegiet (detalje 1).JPG, which was an even worse example of the disturbing Deletion Frenzy. This specific photo was not showing any kind of Art. It was a photo of a construction of which there is very clearly FOP. Túrelio even points it out specifically to me. I have re-created my post on the files talk page now, and hopefully someone could reassure me that it was indeed a violation of procedures, a mistake and perhaps write an apology?

RhinoMind (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

RhinoMind, we do not keep pages in file namespace which do not have files, so do not be surprised if they are deleted. As for the discussion it is quite common to have deletion requests with multiple files, when the reason for the deletion is exactly the same. If you do not agree with the deletion, or with the indirect claim that reason for the deletion is exactly the same, than please discuss it at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests instead of on the file namespace pages, which will just get deleted. --Jarekt (talk) 18:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ok then, I will have a look at the page you mention and perhaps post there later. I would like deletion procedures to be taken seriously, I would like some kind of professional communication to be enforced as well. Its important. If some things needs to be explained over and over again, make a template or something for it. Bots do that, so human editors can just as well. Thanks for the info Jarekt. RhinoMind (talk) 19:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rückzug aus dem Danewerk 5-6. Februar 1864.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

File:Rückzug aus dem Danewerk 5-6. Februar 1864.jpg is a grisaille and not a painting in full color in the original, see here http://360-foto.dk/krigen-1864/ in room one. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:29, 21 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Villy Fink Isaksen: I have checked up, and I remembered the original painting as being full colour, but it seems that you are right: The original was a grisaille (black-and-white monochrome). See here fx: Krigen i 1864 (danmarkshistorien.dk). However, is the painting on display, that you photographed not a reproduction of Niels Simonsens iconic and famous original or is it really the original itself? RhinoMind (talk) 18:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am not the photografer. The source and the photografer is mentioned in the file's data/artwork. The source is http://1864.dk/wp/wp-content/themes/1864/1864tidende.ajax.php?object_id=177&img=177.jpg and copy of that. It must be a copy of the original itself. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 18:33, 21 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Veje og motorveje

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hej RhinoMind

Jeg er bange for, at du blander nogle ting sammen med dine kategoriseringer af danske veje og motorveje. Category:Roads in Denmark er den overordnede kategori for alle slags danske veje. Almindelige landeveje vil typisk blive placeret her. Category:Motorways in Denmark er derimod en underkategori specielt for motorveje. En almindelig vej som Gammel Køge Landevej har intet at gøre i den kategori.

Derudover er Ring 3 og Motorring 3 ved København to forskellige ting. Ring 3 er en almindelig ringvej bestående af bla.a. Nordre Ringvej, mens Motorring 3 er en motorvej, der ligger parallelt med den. --Dannebrog Spy (talk) 14:37, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Tak for besked. Nu ved jeg besked. Mit engagement var primært at få kategoriseret veje i og omkring København. Af en eller anden grund, er mange emner fra og omkring København ikke indlagt i de gængse kategorier. Og nej, jeg er ikke helt stærk i hvad der definerer en motorvej, så tak for hjælpen.

Mht. Ring 3 og Motorring 3, så troede jeg at det var én og samme ringvej. Jeg havde oprettet kategorien Ring 3 og ville egentligt nedlægge den igen, men den genopliver jeg så lige. Tak for inputs. RhinoMind (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Gastromé i Aarhus

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hejsa. Jeg kan se du har taget mange billeder i Aarhus. Flot arbejde. Du var vel ikke et liggende af denne Michelin-restaurant i Rosensgade - da:Gastromé. hilsen Royal Export (talk) 13:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hej og tak for interessen. Nej jeg har ikke nogen, men kan måske snuppe ét ved lejlighed. Facaden er dog ikke videre interessant.

PS. Hvis du er interesseret i mad i Aarhus og mangler lidt inspiration eller et kort overblik, så har jeg skrevet en mindre guide på Wikivoyage. RhinoMind (talk) 05:40, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Royal Export: Tilbage igen. Jeg har fornyligt uploadet et billede af Gastromé (File:Gastromé.jpg). Det er taget tilbage i marts. Det er ikke vildt godt, men kan måske bruges? RhinoMind (talk) 16:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Det er meget fornemt. 👍🏼👍🏼 Jeg har nu indsat det i artiklen om Gastromé. Hilsen --Royal Export (talk) 17:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Mulnæs / Mols

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hej RhinoMind, jeg undrer mig over at du har døbt kategorien Mols Mulnæs et totalt ukendt navn både i Danmark, på Google, på en.wiki og på commons. Jeg er ikke så fortrolig med procedurene vedr. flytning på Commons, men finder det ret frustrerende at blive omdirigeret til Category:Mulnæs når man prøver at oprette Category:Mols. - Nico (talk) 09:05, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hej. Det er noget tid siden, men som jeg lige husker det på stående fod, så er Skødshoved kun en pynt på halvøen Mulnæs. Mulnæs er simpelthen navnet for halvøen øst for halvøen Helgenæs. Vi er så vandt til at tale om Skødshoved, fordi den er et ret synligt "hoved" i Aarhusbugten, men selve "næs"-set som Skødshoved er en lille del af hedder Mulnæs. Det fremgår blandt andet i navnene "hoved" og "næs".

Jeg har aldrig omdirigeret hele Mols til Mulnæs, det har du fået galt fat i. Jeg omdirigerede derimod Skødshoved til Mulnæs, fordi Mulnæs - som forklaret - er metakategorien. Vi kan eventuelt danne Skødshoved som en underkategori af Mulnæs, men det mener jeg er for meget af det gode. Så stor er Mulnæs trods alt heller ikke at der skulle være behov for sådan en ekstra underkategori.

Jeg har generelt ladet mig lede af geografisk korekthed og ikke hvad der er mest brugt i folkemunde, eller popper mest frem ved google opslag. Fordi det er selve geografien, placeringen som har været det centrale. Af én eller anden grund er vi i Danmark (generelt set) helt utroligt dårlige til geografi; også når det gælder vores eget land. Jo mere jeg har arbejdet med det, jo mere overrasket er jeg blevet over denne faglige blindhed i vores nuværende kultur. Et slående eksempel er at der kun meget sjældent vises kort når sted-specifikke begivenheder beskrives i medierne. Prøv selv at se efter. Det er meget mærkeligt at opleve, når man lige får øje på problemet. Og det er radikalt anderledes end hvad man eksempelvis finder i den engelske kultur, især den amerikanske, som jo er en dominerende kultur internationalt. Dér har vi åbenbart meget at lære. Nå, det var lidt ekstra, for at sætte problemet i perspektiv.

RhinoMind (talk) 13:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

En anden grund til at bruge ordet Mulnæs, var muligvis at lade det omfatte alle de mange halvøer i Syddjurs. "Mols" er ikke et særligt veldefineret begreb og det er muligvis derfor jeg undgik det. Blandt andet omfatter Mols sjældent Helgenæs, af uvisse årsager. Mens Mulnæs kunne omfatte alle de "næs" der stikker ud på Syddjurs. Men det er svært at gå videre med Mulnæs ordet så længe jeg ikke kan levere kilder på det. Mols er derimod ikke særligt veldefineret og et vagt geografisk begreb, uanset dets popularitet i daglig sproget. RhinoMind (talk) 14:08, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Opfølgning Her er lidt referencer til en start: Mols Hoved. Andre "hoveder" på Mulnæs udover Skødshoved, er Mols Hoved, Drejet Øhoved og Tved Øhoved. "Hovederne" er alle en del af en lille halvø, et "næs". Jeg har ikke fundet kilde på navnet Mulnæs endnu, men kan se at næsset ofte omtales som "halvøen", "Tved-halvøen" eller "Tvedhalvøen". Sikkert fordi Tved Sogn omfatter halvøen/næsset. Udviklings- og bevaringsplan for landsbyen Tved, Dejret - Kulturmiljøer i Århus Amt, Mols Hoved

Ændringer Jeg har nu oprettet kategorien Tvedhalvøen, med udgangspunkt i ovenstående referencer. Indtil videre har jeg omdirigeret Mulnæs til hele Mols og vender så tilbage hvis der dukker flere kilder op, mht til Mulnæs. RhinoMind (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Jeg er stadig forvirret. det er OK med Tvedhalvøen, men du siger Mulnæs er simpelthen navnet for halvøen øst for halvøen Helgenæs. og at du lader dig lede af geografisk korekthed samtidig med at Mulnæs ikke findes på hverken nye eller gamle kort, eller i en tekstsøgning. ... men la' nu det være, det ser rimeligt ud som det er nu. - Nico (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Altså med den kommentar kan jeg jo ikke "la' det nu være". Som jeg tydeligt skrev er det lang tid siden og jeg var/er ikke lige i stand til at finde kilden på Mulnæs frem. Fakta er at Mols ikke er et særligt veldefineret geografisk begreb. Mols omfatter ikke hele det samlede Syddjurske "næs" med de tre halvøer Hasnæs, Helgenæs og hvad jeg nu har introduceret som Tvedhalvøen. Spørgsmålet er så om Mulnæs gøre det? Og om Mulnæs egentligt ikke blot var et andet "næs" navn for Tvedhalvøen. Det ville være rart at få afklaret og jeg skal nok vende tilbage med kilde hvis muligt. Du må også gerne hjælpe, eventuelt med et bedre navn. Mols er fint, det bruges jo konstant i daglig tale, men når vi taler geografi, ja så er det ikke nogen velfunderet kategori. Problemet er ikke løst. Læs hvad jeg skriver, så er der ikke nogen grund til sure miner. RhinoMind (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ingen sure miner her, jeg mener bare ikke det giver nogen mening at bruge, eller at lede efter kilder til et stednavn der ikke bruges nogen steder, - det kan da højest være som en historisk kuriositet i en artiklerne, men ikke som kategori. Som jeg skrev ovenfor, synes jeg Tvedhalvøen er en ok løsning på et, som du selv siger, ikke klart defineret område. Tvedhaløen bruges også i flere artikler om området. - Nico (talk) 15:31, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hej. Ja, men hvad stiller vi så op med den store halvø som består af de tre halvøer Tvedhalvøen, Helgenæs og Hasnæs? Den er også en halvø, men Mols omfatter normalt kun Tvedhalvøen og Hasnæs samt lidt af fastlandet i Syddjurs. Det har desværre stadig den effekt at Mols ikke rigtig er et geografisk brugbart navn. Men hvad vi så skal bruge, det er stadig et åbent spørgsmål. Inden vi finder en løsning på det, kunne det være godt hvis vi specificerede hvad der menes med Mols som Wikicommons kategori. Hvis vi altså har et valg mht det. Der er to opgaver her at kaste sig over. Men selvfølgelig kun når der er tid og det er sjovt at arbejde med. RhinoMind (talk) 15:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Request

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

In File:Dubbing films in Europe1.png and File:Dubbing in Europe 1.png, could you translate this new legend into Danish?

Belgium: The Flemish speaking region occasionally produces its own dialect dubbing versions, otherwise solely subtitles. The French speaking region of Wallonia and the German speaking region of East Belgium use exclusively a full-cast dubbing, both for films and for TV series.

Yours sincerely, A2D2 (talk) 01:10, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ah, yes, of course. Thanks for the trust and notice. I'll readily translate them to Danish as well.

However, most material with English texts are generally not translated to Danish, as Danish is usually regarded as such a small language. Only when the subject is directly related to Denmark and Danish culture is it considered normally. Not a policy of mine, but that is just my general perception. RhinoMind (talk) 06:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Done! I found that the legend was already translated, and in a good quality. I copy-edited a few things, however. RhinoMind (talk) 07:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Western European broadleaf forests

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi RhinoMind, I just noticed that you have created Category:Western European broadleaf forests and filled it in a way that contradicts the rules against over-categorization: You placed many pictures in the category that are already included in the subcategories like Category:Black Forest. It seems like, doing this, you were trying to create a gallery page by categorizing pictures. But that's not the way galleries or categories are supposed to work. You could instead create a gallery page and place it within the category. See the respective guidelines Commons:Galleries and Commons:Categories for more information. Regards, --Sitacuisses (talk) 07:01, 13 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi RhinoMind,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:15, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi RhinoMind,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi RhinoMind,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:Co-housing

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Co-housing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Themightyquill (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Category:Waterfalls in Taiwan

Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Propaganda? Either way, I didn't see anything wrong with my edit. Did I miss something or did you make a mistake? If you believe that there was a problem with my edit, please open a discussion at COM:HD.--Kai3952 (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Kai3952: Well, I haven't been working with categories involving Taiwan before, but was very perplexed to see the island was categorized as a country. That's all. Now I know a few people wants to push for Taiwan being recognized as a country, but they are very few as almost everybody - including Taiwan itself -, does not categorise Taiwan as a country, but a selfgoverning part of China.

Do you happen to know why Taiwan have been categorised as a country on WikiCommons? And why did you revert my changes as vandalism? RhinoMind (talk) 15:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Because you didn't look carefully at what I was doing. If the issue you care about is "does not categorise Taiwan as a country, but a selfgoverning part of China", I strongly suggest that you discuss it with the community. It means that there are a very large number of subcategories under "Category:Taiwan". I'd like to kindly remind you to be careful, because of the people will spend time revising, Taiwanese users will revise from "China" to "Taiwan", Chinese users will revise from "Taiwan" to "China", this issue is both annoying and troublesome.--Kai3952 (talk) 18:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Kai3952: Yeah, I guess its one of those politically infested subjects, where facts are impossible to implement. It's just strange how Taiwan got categorized as a country in the first place. Like really strange. RhinoMind (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

And ... oh yes, I paid attention. You reinstalled Taiwan as a country. Which it isn't. By no ones standard. RhinoMind (talk) 20:10, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

This is a complicated political issue that has been an unpleasant story to the Republic of China withdraws from the United Nations. Because most countries in the world that follow the "One China" policy agree that there is only one state called China. Taiwan (the Republic of China) has never been ruled by the People's Republic of China, nor has the Chinese government deployed any government functionaries or armed forces here, but they claimed that Taiwan is a part of China. Obviously, Taiwan is neither a part of China, nor an independent sovereign state.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:35, 29 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Kai3952: Sure, and thanks for the details. But Taiwan is still not a country. A country and a state are two very different things. I don't understand how Taiwan ended up in the country category here on WikiCommons. It is really odd. It's like saying Hawaii is a country, or the Falklands is a country, or Tibet is a country. This is not about disrespecting anybody, or disrespecting history, it's just about reflecting reality. RhinoMind (talk) 12:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please don't argue with me; I am just "answering" your question. I know that Taiwan should not be placed in category "by country", but I must do that. Although this is not perfect, I think the current way is the best way to ensure that the classification tree is much more manageable. I have to emphasize again that if you disagree with my edit, please discuss it with the community. In retrospect, my workload is always huge, so I don't have much time to discuss how to solve this issue (which means that finding the best solution is time consuming). I would really prefer that you do NOT ping me to reply.--Kai3952 (talk) 21:00, 30 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Alf Tolboe Jensen

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Kan du finde den mindeplade i Musikhusparken, der er nævnt i da:Alf Tolboe Jensen? --Hjart (talk) 07:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hej. Den kender jeg godt nok ikke. Og havde aldrig hørt om ham Alf der før. Jeg kikker lige efter den ved lejlighed og tager et billede hvis jeg finder den. Tak for tippet!

Bare kom med flere foto-forslag. Det er ikke sikkert jeg kan/vil/har tid til at løse dem, men det er altid sjovt at prøve. RhinoMind (talk) 14:22, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Kuvert cake

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Do you by any chance have a recipt for the 'kuvert' cake?

I had it when I want to an 'efterskole' by the Danish/German border and it's been my favourite cake ever since. I would love to learn to make it for real instead of just guessing. 84.238.84.52 21:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello! And thanks for asking. I have been putting up several images of Danish cakes, including Kuvert cake. If you haven't seen it already, I created a whole category for them here on Wikicommons, take a look here:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Kuverter_(cake)

In the text-space for one of the images, I included a short description of what Kuverter (or Kuvert cake) consists of. Here goes:

"They consist of a square of marzipan, wrapped around a filling of sponge cake and whipped butter-cream. The cake is then sealed with dark chocolate. The flavouring of the butter-cream varies."

The Kuvert cake in the photos I uploaded was flavoured with strawberry. As I understands it, there are five steps in making your own Kuvert cakes:

1. Bake (or buy) a good quality flat sponge cake (it is the same kind of cake you use as layers in layer-cakes).

2. Make butter-cream and flavour it with your favourite flavour. Fruits used for jams are preferred, but you can choose whatever you like. Maybe you could use a good quality jam instead of fresh fruit? I think it would make the flavour more intense. You could also smear a layer of jam on the sponge cake, before you spread the butter-cream.

3. Roll out a thin layer of good quality marzipan (with a high percentage of almonds and less sweet). Or make your own marzipan.

4. Melt some dark chocolate.

5. Build the cake with marzipan, sponge cake and butter-cream. Fold it. and dip in dark chocolate. Put in the refrigerator until the chocolate has hardened.

Enjoy!

If I find a proper recipe from a patisserie on-line, I will come back and share it here. RhinoMind (talk) 20:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic