Moonik

Moonik is taking a wikibreak Until the porno content is removed from Commons.

No to Pornography on Commons Non à la Pornographie sur Commons .

1. 1. JKadavoor Jee 08:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Archives /Archives 2011-2012

Happy new year 2013

...for all visitors of this page happy new year 2013! --Moonik (talk) 04:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro station entrance (édicule Guimard) Porte Dauphine Paris 16e 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metro station entrance (édicule Guimard) Porte Dauphine Paris 16e 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc du Château de la Malmaison 007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good light. --NorbertNagel 13:54, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rueil-Malmaison Parc de Bois-Préau 008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 20:17, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

La gare

J'ai modifié la syntaxe du scope. En écrivant comme çà tu pointe sur la galerie. J'y ai mis ton image. C'est plus "élégant", même si çà ne dispense pas d'aller voir la catégorie. Mais surtout le Bot va, par la suite, labelliser ton image dans la galerie. C'est merveilleux! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:41, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cupola of Galeries Lafayette Haussmann Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. J'aime beaucoup la présence de la jeune fille à droite. --Vassil 17:47, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Bécon Courbevoie 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Bécon Courbevoie 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:31, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Galeries Lafayette Haussmann Paris 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 16:56, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Views from Galeries Lafayette Haussmann, Paris 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 13:49, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare de Paris-Saint-Lazare 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:40, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc de Saint-Cloud 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --JLPC 15:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cupola of Galeries Lafayette Haussmann Paris 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Views from Galeries Lafayette Haussmann, Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit of vignetting (as the other image). Too much sky IMO, but it's only my personal opinion--Lmbuga 13:54, 5 January 2013 (UTC)  Done --Moonik 09:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC). Thanks. I like ir. Good image--Lmbuga 21:01, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gare de Paris-Saint-Lazare (south facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

•  Oppose Needs information regarding the architect and year of construction on the file description or parent category. This is necessary to verify the copyright status, since France does not have Freedom of Panorama. cmadler (talk) 15:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment There are already the category 19th century train stations.--Paris 16 (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
  • That is not sufficient. A late-19th century French building is still be under copyright if the architect lived into 1943 (70 years pma from 1943 runs until 1/1/2014). This is not simply an academic issue; we just had a VI nomination of an 1896 building for which the architect died in 1942, meaning it just entered the public domain a week ago! cmadler (talk) 14:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
• The architect is Juste Lisch and he died in 1910.--Paris 16 (talk) 23:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support now. I added that information to the description of the category, and also to the relevant en-wp article. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 14:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 07:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cupola of Galeries Lafayette Haussmann Paris 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Feels a bit tilted, but ok I think. --Mattbuck 00:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of the Doge's Palace (Venice) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Views from the Campanile of St. Mark's Basilica 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments composition is not the best, there is some distortion in the lower domes, however, ok for me --The Photographer 17:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)--The Photographer 17:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of the Doge's Palace (Venice) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte San Domenego (Venice) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ponte San Domenego (Venice) 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine du Cirque Paris 8e 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boucherie de la Fontaine de Mars, 112 rue Saint-Dominique Paris 7e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:42, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort San Andrea on Vignole, Venecia 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:32, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fort San Andrea on Vignole, Venecia 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 19:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chiesa della Pietà, Venice 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello from Bacino di San Marco, Venice 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giudecca from the Church of San Giorgio Maggiore 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:09, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Belvédère du Petit Trianon, Versailles 006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks nice SkywalkerPL 20:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dogana da mar, Venice 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dogana da mar, Venice 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:00, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiosque a musique aux Champs-Élysées.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Crop? SkywalkerPL 20:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC)  Support Fine with me. --Iifar 08:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallace Fountain in Rueil-Malmaison 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:16, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wallace Fountain in Rueil-Malmaison 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Isn't it tilted cw? Poco a poco 19:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)  Done Not realy for me, but I tried to fix it anywere --Moonik 08:51, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

roofs of Philibert de l'orme

Bonjour Moonik, je viens de voir que vous avez eu la bonne idée de créer une catégorie pour les toits à la Philibert de l'Orme, et que vous y avez mis deux de mes photos. Cela tombe bien car j'ai l'intention de photographier tous ceux que je vais pouvoir trouver dans le Calvados.

Mais j'ai un ami Anglais qui m'a dit que la formulation que vous avez adoptée, bien que grammaticalement correcte, ne convient pas vraiment à ce que l'on veut exprimer.Il suggère de la remplacer par "Philibert de l'Orme roofs".Acceptez-vous de vous en charger ou préférez-vous que je le fasse? (tout simplement en vidant"roofs of Philibert de l'Orme" après avoir créé "Philibert de l'Orme roofs", je pense. La première serait délitée ensuite par un robot. Je pense aussi qu'il serait mieux pour la visibilité de la catégorie de ne mettre qu'une seule photo par édifice dans une catégorie comme celle-là, même si on en met plusieurs prises sous différents angles dans la ville d'origine (comme je l'ai fait pour la maison à St Aubin-sur-Mer) Il est en effet probable que je mettrai au moins deux photos à chaque fois de chaque toiture , mais je souhaite n'en mettre qu'une dans la catégorie: toits à la Philibert de l'Orme.

Bravo pour vos jolies photos, j'aime beaucoup , en particulier, les balcons ds galeries Lafayette. Bonne continuation très cordialement Pimprenel (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)pimprenel

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ca' Giustinian and Palazzo Bauer in Venice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Górnii Garonnii ?

Bonjour, serait-ce par hasard correct? Ou bien est-ce un horrible barbarisme ? J'ai inventé ça à partir de Tarn i Garonnii pour faire Architektura XVIII wieku w Górnii Garonnii. - Olybrius (talk) 21:11, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

(Mouais, ç'aurait été trop beau...) Merci de ces explications ; je vais de ce pas corriger mes affreux bidouillages. - Olybrius (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riva degli Schiavoni, Venice 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportQI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 16:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Crozat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perspective distortion SkywalkerPL 20:31, 19 January 2013 (UTC) Perspective fixed, but it seems rather red to me. Mattbuck 15:26, 21 January 2013 (UTC)  Done Red cast fixed. --Moonik 16:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC) I'm not entirely convinced, but acceptable. Mattbuck 04:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zattere in Venice, Italy 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction on left side improvable Poco a poco 15:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks. --Moonik 15:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rio di San Lorenzo, Venice 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:59, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	For lots of beautiful images of Paris contributed do Commons. Tupungato (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Memorial of Fighting France, Suresnes 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Rjcastillo 13:55, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Catégorie Valleys of Hautes-Pyrénées

Bonjour Je profite de ce que vous parlez français. Je vois que vous travaillez en ce moment sur la catégorie citée. Ce ne sera pas du luxe ! Pour ma part, je n'en suis pas vraiment capable ... J'ai fini par réussir à ajouter une photo sur Juncalas, village du Castelloubon, vallée adjacente, plus exactement affluente de celle du Lavedan dans les Hautes-Pyrénées (Lavedan = vallée de Lourdes à Argelès et Pierrefitte-Nestalas). Ces catégories sont inexistantes. Je vois aussi que la vallée de Lesponne existe en catégorie, mais n'est pas rattachée aux vallées des Hautes-Pyrénées alors qu'elle en fait partie. Si on a créé une catégorie "Vallées des Hautes-Pyrénées", pourquoi pas une catégorie "Vallées des Pyrénées-Atlantiques", avec les vallées d'Ossau et d'Aspe qui existent en catégories ? Tout cela est bien compliqué n'est-ce pas ? Je serais heureuse de vous aider, modestement, mais je ne veux pas ajouter à la confusion. Toutefois, je suis intéressée par vos commentaires et suggestions éventuels. A bientôt peut-être. Bon courage. --ChristianeB (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Paris from Mont-Valérien, Suresnes 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rueil-Malmaison Église Saint-Pierre-Saint-Paul 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:48, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of the Süleymaniye Mosque in Istanbul, Turkey 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of noise in the sky, but good to go --Poco a poco 18:33, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

sous catégorie Miliaria dans Milestones

Bonjour Moonik, je me rend compte que la catégorie Milestones regroupe toutes les bornes routières. Saurais-tu créer une sous-catégorie Miliaria dans toute l'arborescence Milestones pour les bornes milliaires romaines ? Merci d'avance (et pour le travail réalisé par ici). Piero (talk) 11:42, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Piero,

Merci pour ton message. Je regarde qu'est ce que je peux faire dans ce domaine. Cordialement --Moonik (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Déjà un merci pour ta réponse. N'hésite pas à me demander des précision, si c'est nécessaire (hélas, je ne maîtrise pas assez le Gadget-Cat-a-lot, ni la structure de l'arborescence pour le faire). Amicalement. Piero (talk) 14:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

J'observe ton travail impeccable avec réjouissance. Une question, pendant que tu es en plein dedans : est-il possible de faire aussi une sous catégorie Category:Monuments historiques in xxx (miliaria) à Category:Monuments historiques in xxx (milestones) ? Piero (talk) 19:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC) PS : je ne sais pas si il existe d'autres bornes que des milliaires, classés ou inscrits au MH. Si c'est le cas, pourquoi garder Category:Monuments historiques in xxx (milestones) ?

C'est un peu plus délicat de créer les Monuments historiques du type miliaria par département. On m'avait déjà demandé de ne pas créer les monuments historiques par type et par département (intersection) donc on devrait rester au niveau de la France pour les types des monuments comme milestones ou miliaria. Par ailleurs, les milestones comme monuments historiques ne sont pas assez nombreux pour les fragmenter d'avantage. En plus, dans cette catégorie existent bien d'autre types des milestonesque des miliaria, par exemple les bornes dans l'Essonne. A mon avis, il vaut mieux aujourd'hui rester à ce niveau de détails et attendre qu'il a plus des photos des bornes milliaires dans nos départements. Mes amitiés --Moonik (talk) 19:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Merci infiniment Moonik, et bravo pour ce travail remarquable et généreusement efficace. Je n'oublie pas ton français impeccable, et ta connaissance administrative de la France.

Je ne voudrais pas te contrarier, mais, sauf si tu t'y oppose formellement (je te dois bien ça), je me permettrais de créer ponctuellement ces sous catégories dont je te parlais et qui me semblent pertinentes (affin d'éviter toutes confusions entres les bornes routières médiévales ou modernes et celles datant de l'Empire romain). Nous verrons bien si cela fait débat.

Bonne continuation et accepte encore mes remerciements respectueux. Piero (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Bonsoir Piero, grands merci pour toutes tes appréciations de mon travail et le barnstar. Pour ton initiative de création des monuments historiques du type miliaria je ne suis absolument pas la personne qui va s'opposer. On vera ce que diront les autres à ce sujet. De mon côte je termine bientôt de répartir par département les dernières miliaria qui restent en France. Bon courage et bon travail pour toi. --Moonik (talk) 16:53, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bacino di San Marco in Venice 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very sharp but nice colours. --JLPC 17:56, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Giorgio Maggiore Island (Venice) 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful --Moroder 09:29, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Canal Grande in Venice 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A stiching problem, easy to fix (see note). --JLPC 17:56, 2 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks, stitching error fixed. --Moonik 08:05, 3 March 2013 (UTC) Good now. --JLPC 10:01, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gare des Invalides, Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:15, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
West facade of Gare des Invalides in Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Stunning ! Best in scope and... no problem of FoP ! :)--Jebulon (talk) 16:38, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 01:13, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont Alexandre III seen from the Pont des Invalides 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:12, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! American Cemetery and Memorial in Suresnes 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 10:33, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Interiors of churches

Sorry for the hassle. Might ask on COM:BWR to change the navigation prefixes for the departements and regions. --Foroa (talk) 18:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine des Fleuves, Place de la Concorde, Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting, nice motive --The Photographer 17:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine des Fleuves, Place de la Concorde, Paris 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not 100% convinced about the crop, but good overall --Poco a poco 12:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade of Palais du Luxembourg, Paris 5th 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:32, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orangerie du Jardin du Luxembourg, Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Disortion/tilt. Otherwise good. --ArildV 11:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Fixed. --Moonik 12:37, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Ok now.--ArildV 10:29, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Orangerie du Jardin du Luxembourg, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Maybe it would be good to add (exterior) :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:25, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment you're right, I added (exterior) to the scope. --Moonik (talk) 15:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade of Palais du Luxembourg, Paris 6th 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect but good enough --Poco a poco 20:05, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Towpath of Bouziès.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment But unfortunately not geocoded --Llez (talk) 07:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

•  Done Geolocation done. --Moonik (talk) 14:53, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fontaine de Léda in Paris.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be useful to add: Paris in the scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

•  Done --Moonik (talk) 06:36, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine de Médicis Paris 6th 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument à Emmanuel Frémiet by Henri Greber in Jardin des Plantes, Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:45, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia liliiflora 'Nigra' in Jardin des Plantes, Paris 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:44, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle Sainte-Ursule de la Sorbonne, Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia liliiflora 'Nigra' in Jardin des Plantes, Paris 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:50, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Hôtel de Gramont / Crozat

Bonjour, on en avait déjà peut-être parlé mais je ne m'en souviens plus... l'hôtel de Gramont et l'hôtel de Crozat, c'est pas la même chose ? En tout cas, la notice Mérimée dit que si [1]. --Zolo (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Bonjour Zolo, En faite, les deux anciens hôtels particuliers : Hôtel de Gramont situé au 15 place Vendôme et Hôtel de Crozat situé au 17 Place Vendôme, qui étaient séparés à l'origine en été réunis pour former Hôtel Ritz. La fiche Mérimée concerne les deux hôtels à la fois, mais ce sont bien deux bâtiments distincts. --Moonik (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Ah oui c'est vrai désolé (et puis "anciens hôtels au pluriel"...). Merci ! --Zolo (talk) 14:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Besoin d'aide en langue polonaise

Bonjour Moonik.

Il y a une question à propos d'une catégorie en langue polonaise qui laisse perplexe les participants au bistro francophone.

Peut-être pourrais-tu être très utile, dans cette circonstance ?

Merci d'avance.--Jebulon (talk) 17:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malus spectabilis in the Jardin des Plantes, Paris 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malus toringo in the Jardin des Plantes of Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:53, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus speciosa in the Jardin des Plantes 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia stellata in the Jardin de Plantes de Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:00, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prunus Sato-Zakura 'Shirotae' in the Jardin des Plantes, Paris 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 13:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia Suffruticosa 'Shin Kamata' in the Jardin de Bagatelle, Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platanus × hispanica in the Jardin des Plantes de Paris 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Selbymay 08:43, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clematis 'Apple Blossom' in the Jardin des Plantes de Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI in my eyes. --Malchen53 22:31, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clematis 'Apple Blossom' in the Jardin des Plantes de Paris 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe a little bit oversharpened but QI for me. --JLPC 18:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wszechświat z klocków LEGO, czyli o tym co to jest i jak sobie zrobić Mechanizm z Antykithiry

Category:Wszechświat z klocków LEGO, czyli o tym co to jest i jak sobie zrobić Mechanizm z Antykithiry

Zgadza się, jest to tytuł tego wystąpienia z którego pochodzą zdjęcia. Myślę że nazwa kategorii powinna zostać w języku kraju w którym dzieje się wydarzenie fotografowane i w pełnym oryginalnym brzmieniu. Czy są jakieś ogolnokommonsowe ustalenia które by zabraniały zostawienia tego po polsku? Twoją propozycję dodam jako opis kategorii. Marek Mazurkiewicz (talk) 12:44, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bay of Balos, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goat at the Kissamos Gulf in Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well done --Rjcastillo 14:12, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Kissamos in Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Rjcastillo 13:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Kissamos in Crete, Greece 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some oversatured and oversharpen, but ok --The Photographer 12:10, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panoramics of Rethymno in Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --Rjcastillo 14:14, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Celebrity Reflection cruise ship in Santorini, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Christian Ferrer 11:46, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bay of Balos, Crete 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:15, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agios Titos in Heraklion, Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Goodd Quality --Rjcastillo 19:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agia Galini harbour in Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agia Galini harbour in Crete, Greece 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI IMO--Lmbuga 09:44, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaches of Agia Galini, Crete, Greece 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too much foreground IMO but good --Poco a poco 17:38, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Venetian fortress, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very well. --Florstein 16:47, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heraklion old harbour in Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heraklion old harbour in Crete, Greece 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff of the Matala Bay, Crete, Greece 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 14:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff of the Matala Bay, Crete, Greece 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI for me--Lmbuga 17:15, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff of the Matala Bay, Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality- I like the light and sky. --NorbertNagel 12:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venetian Fortress of Koules in Heraklion, Crete 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Florstein 07:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A stitching problem, probably fixable (see note, please). --JLPC 16:59, 17 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Stitching error fixed. --Moonik 18:52, 17 May 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, I presume my note wasn't at the right place. I've tried a new one : the beach and the water are still cut in two parts. --JLPC 22:19, 17 May 2013 (UTC) Probably it was a cache problem to display a new version. Is it OK now? --Moonik 05:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)  Done New attempt to download the good file. --Moonik 14:16, 19 May 2013 (UTC) QI now. Sorry for the delay. --JLPC 08:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris germanica 'Best Bet' 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 10:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iris germanica 'Best Bet' 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 10:46, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 15:24, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goat at the Kissamos Gulf in Crete 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good now. --Nino Verde 18:59, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Rjcastillo 14:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of Agia Irini in Gramvousa Peninsule (Kissamos), Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heraklion old harbour in Crete, Greece 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Phalacrocorax carbo in the port of Chania, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Minoan ruins in Chania, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments quality ok --Arcalino 06:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oia, Ammoudi harbour, Santorini, Greece 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, even if there are some blown whites and I would prefer a crop at bottom because of the blurred stones --Carschten 16:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harbour of Rethymno, Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania lighthouse in Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and composition.--ArildV 10:00, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ekklisia Ioannis Prodromos in Kissamos, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northwest Portico Lustral Basin in the Knossos Palace, Crete 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 14:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapel of St. Catherine in Rethymno, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stepro 10:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulf of Kissamos in Crete, Greece 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Firkas Fortress in Chania, Crete 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knossos pithoi pottery, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agia Galini harbour in Crete, Greece 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 10:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rethymno with harbour in Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Florstein 07:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Athinios Port in Santorini, Greece 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Athinios Port in Santorini, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:45, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Northwest Portico Lustral Basin in the Knossos Palace, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Küçük Hasan Pasha Mosque in Chania, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Nino Verde 15:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agia Galini harbour in Crete, Greece 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:12, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venetian Fortress of Koules in Heraklion, Crete 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality--Lmbuga 08:06, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agia Galini harbour in Crete, Greece 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gulf of Kissamos in Crete, Greece 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs tilt correction on the horizon --A.Savin 10:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Tilt fixed. --Moonik 11:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Yes, but now it's leaning to both sides, whereas it should be straight imo --A.Savin 19:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)  Info It can't be right because it's not just the sea in front, but the edge of a round bay, whose shores are approaching us, which gives this leaning effect. --Moonik 05:17, 1 June 2013 (UTC)  Support It's not tilted anymore. The three masts on the distant hills are vertical. So overall QI for me. --Dirtsc 15:24, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Arts in Paris 6th 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:56, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse-drawn carts in Chania, Creete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:37, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania Old Harbour in Crete, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania Old Harbour in Crete, Greece 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 12:28, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clematis 'Margaret Hunt' 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 08:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coasts of the Aegean Sea in Heraklion, Crete 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coasts of the Aegean Sea in Heraklion, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Houses in Heraklion, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 07:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heraklion arsenal in Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 07:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grand Staircase in Knossos, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain in Chania, Crete 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It needs a tilt Poco a poco 11:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Tilt fixed --Moonik 12:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! City wall in Chania, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 10:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Küçük Hasan Pasha Mosque in Chania, Crete 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:51, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Küçük Hasan Pasha Mosque in Chania, Crete 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont des Arts in Paris 6th 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO it need perspective correction, look at the left of the bulding in background --Christian Ferrer 07:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Perspective error fixed. --Moonik 07:34, 9 June 2013 (UTC)  Support Good --Christian Ferrer 18:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heraklion old harbour in Crete, Greece 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks CW tilted. --Tuxyso 14:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)  Done tilt fixed. --Moonik 16:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC) Looks better now. --Tuxyso 06:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beach of Matala, Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:52, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heraklion old harbour in Crete, Greece 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:29, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Rethymno in Crete 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knossos north entrance, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 15:33, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agia Galini harbour in Crete, Greece 006.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 08:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Platanias near Rethymno, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 08:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harbour of Rethymno, Crete, Greece 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice atmosphere. --JLPC 17:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fortezza in Rethymno, Crete 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chania Old Harbour in Crete, Greece 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can live with that, but it is not my taste --Poco a poco 22:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oia in Santorini, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Promontory of Akrotiri on Santorini Island, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 15:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santorini lighthouse, Greece 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, maybe it needs a slight ccw tilt --Poco a poco 14:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)  Done --Moonik 07:05, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 007.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port of Plakias in Crete, Greece 008.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cliff of the Matala Bay, Crete, Greece 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Port Debilly in Paris 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 20:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Fountains of Trocadero in Paris 001.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountains of Trocadero in Paris 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountains of Trocadero in Paris 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. May be a bit more sharpness can make this image better --Nino Verde 15:01, 28 June 2013 (UTC) Sorry, it needs perspective correction (see notes)--Lmbuga 02:47, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Comment It is impossible to make the lines straight, the Palais de Chaillot building is curved and the esplanade fall down from the high of the Trocadero square to the Seine river. Look other photos in these categories Jardins du Trocadéro. I think to make everything stright you should rebuild the whole place. --Moonik 05:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Comment Sorry, I am agree with Lmbuga, I've try on my PC and corrected it, if you ask me, I can uploaded it --Christian Ferrer 17:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)  Done I finally saw my mistake on the tilted street lights and upload a new file. Excuse me Lmbuga et merci Christian pour ta remarque. --Moonik 19:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC) The new version is very good, thanks. Sorry for the inconvenience caused--Lmbuga 19:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle Debilly in Paris 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:51, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passerelle Debilly in Paris 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Onam greetings!

Have a nice Onam tomorrow! JKadavoor Jee 17:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

OnaSadya

"Happy Diwali!"

While Diwali is popularly known as the "festival of lights", the most significant spiritual meaning behind it is "the awareness of the inner light". It is the belief that there is something beyond the physical body and mind which is pure, infinite, and eternal, called the Atman. The celebration of Diwali as the "victory of good over evil” refers to the light of higher knowledge dispelling all ignorance, the ignorance that masks one's true nature, not as the body, but as the unchanging, infinite, immanent and transcendent reality. With this awakening come compassion and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge). This brings Satcitananda (joy or peace). Just as we celebrate the birth of our physical being, Diwali is the celebration of this Inner Light. While the story behind Diwali and the manner of celebration varies from region to, the essence is the same – to rejoice in the Inner Light! And this year Diwali and All Souls' Day come together to fully defeat the Evil! "Happy Diwali!" – JKadavoor Jee 06:16, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

I also wish you a very very happy and prosperous diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:25, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Tu nous manques !

Chère Moonik,
Merci beaucoup pour tes félicitations et encouragements ! J'ai eu plaisir à participer à WLM2013 et je suis très contente d'avoir une photo lauréate. Penses-tu revenir un jour sur Commons ? Je l'espère, car tu nous manques, et tes belles photos aussi. Bien amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Graincourt ou Graincourt ?

Bonjour,

La photo File:Bundesarchiv Bild 104-0944, Frankreich, Graincourt, Kirchenruine.jpg représente-t-elle l'église du hameau de Graincourt dans la commune de Category:Derchigny ou celle de la commune de Category:Graincourt-lès-Havrincourt ? La catégorisation indique la première mais l'utilisation sur les Wikipédia indique la seconde… Il me semble que c'est plutôt la seconde mais j'ai un doute…

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fontaine du Square Suzanne Buisson Paris 18e.jpg

Yours sincerely, Natuur12 (talk) 14:11, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Commons Photo Challenge January 2014

Thank-you for participating in Commons:Photo challenge! Come to the talk page to discuss and help organise this new project.

The December 2013 themes will close for submissions this weekend and be ready for voting from Monday 6th January: Coloured light and Silhouette.

For January 2014 there are two themes: A bunch of stuff and January. I hope you are keen to participate. Please read the theme descriptions for full submission rules on each theme. -- Colin (talk)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Moonik⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Moonik,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Ruins_of_castles_in_Israel

Ruins of castles in Israel has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Danny lost (talk) 23:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Farewell?

Hi Moonik, I notice you are taking an extended wikibreak. Best wishes for whatever you have moved on to, and thank you for your great pictures and huge contributions to Commons. --99of9 (talk) 02:41, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

@99of9: I hope Moonik will come back. I'm trying my best; he has many very wonderful works that I see in Flickr. It is pity we are losing serious contributors for the sake of some PORN. :( Jee 04:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

@99of9: This is not a farewell. I still hope the Wikipedia Porn portal, FP porn photos and other images related to sex that have no educational value will finally disappear from Commons. And there, I could proudly say that I attribute to the encyclopedia Wikipedia without shame.

Jee, thank you for your much appreciated support. --Moonik (talk) 12:08, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boulangerie 64 rue Saint-Dominique Paris 7e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 09:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cloister of Val-de-Grâce in Paris 5th 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Château_de_Merlemont

Château de Merlemont has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

2A01:E35:8AAC:CDC0:DCD7:9BE9:2661:C65F 23:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiffel Tower, Paris 7th 011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:16, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eiffel Tower, Paris 7th 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Fountains of Trocadero in Paris 001.jpg

File:Fountains of Trocadero in Paris 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ras67 (talk) 01:39, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Suresnes - Écluse de Suresnes 001 crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 14:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montmartre Maison Rose 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction, the right side is leaning in considerably. Disturbing elements at the bottom, see note. --Cccefalon 09:04, 10 March 2015 (UTC) Thank Cccefalon, but the pink house is not straight.--Paris 16 Might be, but the window and door frames need to be rectilinear. If not, they cannot get closed. --Cccefalon 10:16, 10 March 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank Cccefalon!--Paris 16 07:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC) Now it works! Good quality --Cccefalon 10:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Morosini Fountain in Heracleion, Crete island, Greece 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 09:36, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2015

Hello, You receive this message because we noticed your contributions relating to the Moroccan natural heritage. We would welcome you to participate in the contest Wiki Loves Earth, which aims to encourage the development of natural protected areas throughout the Wikimedia projects (mainly Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons media encyclopedia). The contest runs from 1 to 31 May 2015 and is open to all. Prizes will be awarded at the end. A question, a problem? Do not hesitate to leave a message on the discussion page of the event. See you soon, Reda benkhadra (d · c) For more details | Contact

Panneaux Histoire de Paris

Bonjour ! J'ai dû supprimer ta photo File:Montmartre Lapin Agile 001.JPG, qui représentait un panneau Histoire de Paris (pelle Starck). À la fois le texte et le design sont protégés par le droit d'auteur, et nous n'avons pas de liberté de panorama en France. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Former_town_hall_of_Choisy-le-Roi

Former town hall of Choisy-le-Roi has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jwh (talk) 19:39, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Quai aux Fleurs Paris 4e 002.JPG

File:Quai aux Fleurs Paris 4e 002.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Scoopfinder^(d) 14:23, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Unidentified_patron_saint_churches

Category:Unidentified_patron_saint_churches has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 08:47, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Other_churches_in_France_by_patron_saint

Category:Other_churches_in_France_by_patron_saint has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Auntof6 (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Folie_Saint-James_Temple.jpg

Dear Moonik, I am a Prof. in Architecture and I am currently redacting a book titled “History of Interior Design and Furniture” and it will be published in Turkish edition. I would like to use your image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Folie_Saint-James_Temple.jpg. At the end of the book, the name of the beholder of the image is noted in ‘Picture Credits.’ Do you prefer us to use your nickname in Wikipedia or we can note your proper name if you prefer.

Best regards, Mustafa Demirkan [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serhatakbak (talk • contribs) 12:05, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Category:Cities_and_villages_in_Greece_by_regional_unit

Category:Cities_and_villages_in_Greece_by_regional_unit has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 21:44, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments France 2019

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est de retour et ouvert jusqu'à 31 septembre ! Déjà 8310 photos ont été importés cette année, vous aussi rejoignez le concours !

Le concours concerne tous les monuments présents dans la base Mérimée (qu'ils soient classés, inscrits ou simplement classés). De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la chapelle au coin de la rue aux mégalithes en forêt, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Où que vous soyez il y a des monuments autour de chez vous. Enfin, vous pouvez mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments. Pour information, le règlement est disponible sur le site du concours. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international sélectionnera ensuite des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France les années précédentes. Si vous avez déjà ou si ne pouvez pas participer au concours cette année, faites passer le message autour de vous pour que de nouveaux et nouvelles photographes rejoignent l'aventure !

Bonne journée,

Sarah Krichen WMFr et Nicolas Vigneron, pour l'équipe de Wiki Loves Monuments France, 14:51, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Former_railway_lines_in_Rhône-Alpes

Former railway lines in Rhône-Alpes has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fr.Latreille (talk) 22:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Cloud maison 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Antechamber of the Emperor at Grand Trianon 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of Institut de France 003.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd probably recommend a crop with less sky, but this seems good enough. -- Liberaler Humanist 23:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de La Fare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support A bit too heavy on denoise, but still a QI. --C messier 13:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of Église du Val-de-Grâce 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Palais, Paris 8th 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of Institut de France 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of Institut de France 011.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of Église du Val-de-Grâce 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 20:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of Institut de France 009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Courtyard of Institut de France 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Facade of Palais du Luxembourg, Paris 5th 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 02:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parc Monceau Grille d'entrée 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 14:42, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vase in the chamber of Empress Josephine at Grand Trianon 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Interior of Église du Val-de-Grâce 026.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pavillon d'entrée du Bois de Boulogne 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 04:28, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pantheon of Paris 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locronan house 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cour Napoléon du Palais du Louvre 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel de Chenizot Paris 4e 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior facade of the Hôtel de Bourvallais 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Palais Paris 8e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Michael32710 13:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gloriette de la grotte aux quatre vents, Parc de Bagatelle, Paris 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:50, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin des Tourneroches Saint-Cloud 004.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:05, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin des Tourneroches Saint-Cloud 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:34, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée Paul Belmondo à Boulogne-Billancourt 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 20:51, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pagode Parc de Bagatelle avec Mirror japonais Paris 16e cropped.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Although a tad dark, relatively minor and normal. --SHB2000 04:19, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exterior of the cloister of Val-de-Grâce 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rueil-Malmaison Château de Bois-Préau 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint-Cloud maison 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:32, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Grand bassin octogonal Jardin des Tuileries 003.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Back facade of Palais Bourbon, Paris 7th 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:18, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

le quec ou sartrouville

Bonjour, à propos de la photo https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Le_Pecq_bords_de_Seine_002.JPG êtes vous sur qu'il s'agisse du Pecq ? Les coordonnes de la prise de photo (et ma connaissance des lieux) indique plutot sartrouville).

Cordialement Silanoc (talk) 08:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Malmaison - southwest garden side 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Malmaison - southwest garden side 002.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:09, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Château de Malmaison - southwest garden side 001.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC)