User talk:Moheen/Archive 2017

Archives 2013-14 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021-22 2023

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elizabeth Russell.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 10:47, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shyama.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope. lNeverCry 10:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chiaki Morita.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful. lNeverCry 21:54, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:Eching Beching, Rural Games of Bangladesh (9960817503).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eching Beching.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question - I don't have the expertise to judge whether this is more valuable than File:Eching Beching, Childhood Games (9961647606).jpg or not. Please discuss. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Usually rules of the game is to jump to the other side without a touch of the partner's hands. And this thing is more clear with the other one. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 06:58, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Question You mean it's clearer in this one, no? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 08:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - Yes, It's more clearer in this scope. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 09:07, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

• Then I  Support on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your help in understanding commons procedures!

		The Good Heart Barnstar
		ধন্যবাদ for helping me --Kritzolina (talk) 11:07, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

@Kritzolina: Vielen Dank! :p ~ Moheen ^(talk) 11:53, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait photographs of Raja Ravi Varma.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jennifer Aaker.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 22:50, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ida Aalberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:57, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bonnie and Clyde.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:14, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Edie Adams.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:58, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nabaratna Temple (front passage).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:01, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nandini Ghosal performing Odissi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful and beautiful -- Kritzolina (talk) 10:17, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christine Huber.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Archaeological Museum, Purana Qila (entrance).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hemchandra Bandyopadhyay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:43, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tilottama Majumdar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

 Support Best in the scope —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 07:04, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 17:39, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle (2), 160906, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landgericht Berlin, Littenstraße, Eingangshalle (2), 160906, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Els Moors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: Per your comment here I nominate this one for MVI. Thanks!
•  Support - Most valuable, in my opinion. As mentioned vis-a-vis the other photo, more of her face is in sunlight in this one and she has a nicer expression. Should the status be "discussed"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment When there is at least one Support but no Oppose then status can be replace as Support. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 13:26, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks. Done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:27, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support--Tiven2240 (talk) 12:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Els Moors 2016 02.jpg: -1
2. Els Moors 2016 01.jpg:  2 <--
=>
File:Els Moors 2016 02.jpg: Declined.
File:Els Moors 2016 01.jpg: Promoted. <--

--DeFacto (talk). 18:18, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

POTD on 2017-04-26

Hello Moheen, you've added a picture of Stephen Hawking for POTD on 2017-04-26. I'd like to ask you if it was possible to replace it with this picture of the "Deutsches Historisches Museum", Berlin which you can find here and which I've first nominated for 2018-04-26. The reason for my request is that the museum was built by the architect Ieoh Ming Pei who was born on 1917-04-26 so that 2017-04-26 will be his hundredth (!) birthday. Best regards, --Code (talk) 05:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Code: It was just a date when it was taken. Yes, you can replace it. ~ Moheen ^(talk) 09:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

 Done Thank you. --Code (talk) 06:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

You are welcome! ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:43, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Endoresement?

Hi - I had a message but cannot read it and cannot find your e-mail. 19:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Here is the link. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Rename

Sorry but I'm original uploader and I make mistake to translate them before so I make them back to original languages. Commons is multilingual there's no reason to favor English over other languages, so hope you not make force them fix at mistake titles since original uploader saw and many others of my already be rename. Tnt1984 (talk) 13:41, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

@Tnt1984: I just make you conscious about it. And I already fixed it. Welcome! ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your help. Sorry for my bad English.Tnt1984 (talk) 13:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Botanical Garden and Eco-Park, Sitakunda, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zilla Shilpakala Academy, Chittagong, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
DC's bungalow, DC Hill, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:43, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Kritzolina (talk) 08:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Govinda Gunalanker Hostel, entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittagong University Museum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office of the General Manager of Bangladesh Railway (front).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:44, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engagement gifts basket (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:57, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seven badges on Swaran (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

---

An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Moheen, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin ^webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

odder (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations! --Kritzolina (talk) 19:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

@Odder: @Kritzolina: Thank you both! :) ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:33, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Yikes, I didn't see you crossing the finish line! Congrats! Enjoy!! --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 15:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@Hedwig in Washington: Thanks! :) ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:55, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Melania Trump Official White House Portrait.jpg

Could you restore this for a full discussion? I'm on the fence about deletion, but I don't think it was appropriate for speedy deletion. Photos from non-White House photographers have been retained in the past where the White House said there was no restriction on their publication (e.g. File:Obama family portrait in the Green Room.jpg). I think that posting a photo to whitehouse.gov should be comparable given the whitehouse.gov copyright policy. Thanks, Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Calliopejen1:  Done. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:46, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! It's now at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Melania Trump Official White House Portrait.jpg if you have an opinion one way or the other. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:59, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abdul Karim Sahitya Bisharad (1871-1953).svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikivoyage-Logo-v3-bn.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 20:30, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Patenga sea beach (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Motorboats in Patenga (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Acceptable quality, nicely done. Juliancolton 17:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangladeshi Boat at Patenga sea beach (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sharpness could be better but IMO still OK. However the image is tilted (check horizon), could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 07:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)  Done. Thanks! --Moheen Reeyad 08:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Yann 11:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangladeshi Boat at Patenga sea beach (05).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The sharpness could be better but IMO still OK. However the image is tilted (check horizon), could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 07:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)  Done. Thanks! --Moheen Reeyad 08:30, 31 March 2017 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Yann 11:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Copyright violation on my uploaded file(s)

Hello.

I noticed you have recently deleted the File:Limón - Monument to the Development of the Limón Province - African American mother with her child.jpg, stating "copyright violation" as the reason to do so.

While I admit I am frustrated by my precarious knowledge on how the laws regarding copyright are applied (and by the sort of absurd rules of those; for example, as to how a picture of a sculpture can affect its author in any way), I checked some documents provided by Costa Rican institutions regarding this subject, and indeed such sculpture needs authorization by its creator in order to be reproduced in any way.

I am very sorry for this situation, I have been struggling to tell the difference on why some sculptures and buildings, all being copyrighted, are here on Wikimedia Commons. How can I tell which one can be here and which one cannot now goes beyond my knowledge. So, I suggest you to delete all the uploads I have done of the sculpture, as you previously stated as copyright violation:

File:Limón - Monument to the Development of the Limón Province - Indigenous man.jpg
File:Limón - Monument to the Development of the Limón Province - A man reading a book.jpg
File:Limón - Monument to the Development of the Limón Province - African American people.jpg
File:Limón - Monument to the Development of the Limón Province.jpg

...and these sculptures may be copyrighted as well
File:Limón - Turtles sculpture.jpg
File:Limón - Monkey sculpture.jpg
File:Limón - Obelisk.jpg

...so may be these buildings, I am not sure
File:Limón - Balvanero Vargas park pavilion.jpg
File:Limón - Catedral.jpg
File:Limón - Abandoned amphitheater.jpg
File:Limón - Oficina de Correos.jpg
File:Limón - Banco de Costa Rica.jpg

I do this because I want to be sure that none of my uploads go against Wikimedia policies and because of that I want them reviewed to see if they can stay here. --AndSalx95 (talk) 05:50, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@AndSalx95: Yes, Copyright law allows photographs and pictures made from statues, monuments and other works acquired by the authorities, but it doesn't allow commercial use. So, it will be better start a COM:DR discussion. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:09, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

I requested the deletion to the files regarding the Monument to the development of the province, as you already showed it was copyrighted. Not sure about the rest, though, since the link you provided leads me to a 404 error. --AndSalx95 (talk) 22:13, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@AndSalx95: Opps! There are another link. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:04, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Athens School of Fine Arts (emblem).svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. SVG images are exempt from the minimum 2 Mpx rule. --Peulle 14:46, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiki Loves Butterfly logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

apples and oranges?

How comes you upload screenshots yourself to commons but delete others? Is there something I don't see? --Rabenkind (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

@Rabenkind: Oh! I almost forgot, that was old upload. I already marked that. Thanks for mention. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:47, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Regarding Deletion of File:CodeCarbonScreenshot.png

Hello,

Recently (13:18, 5 April 2017), I found that you had deleted this image File:CodeCarbonScreenshot.png I uploaded for copyright violation. I wanted to notify you that I am the developer and the creator of the image and the game presented on the Code Carbon page.

If there is anything I can do to prove that I am Kon Aoki, one of the main developer of the game and the designer who created that image, I am happy to respond and help. Therefore, it would be wonderful if it could be added back.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siberowl (talk • contribs) 10:28, April 6, 2017‎ (UTC)

@Siberowl: Hello, thanks for your inquiry. Screenshot must be uploaded to Commons with all content is under a free license or in the public domain. Your uploaded file did not prove that is your own work. In that case COM:SS might be helpful. You are welcome to use {{OTRS pending}} template after sending an email to [email protected] which contains permission from the original copyright holder(s). ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 06:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! জাতীয় শিক্ষাক্রম ও পাঠ্যপুস্তক বোর্ড-এর লোগো.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Basotxerri 15:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amar Sonar Bangla Music.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Basotxerri 15:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Government Seal of Bangladesh.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Basotxerri 15:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roundel of Bangladesh.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Basotxerri 15:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wikimedia Bangladesh logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Basotxerri 15:02, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CD-RECORDABLE logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Size requirement does not apply. --Peulle 07:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Indian Institute of Science logo.svg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indian Institute of Science logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Size requirement does not apply. --Peulle 07:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Hypnomys by L.Meslin.png

Did you read it before deleting File:Hypnomys by L.Meslin.png? Jacek555 (talk) 19:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jacek555: Unintentional mistakes.  Done Restored for the current discussion. Thanks for notifying. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logo des Gerbers.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordisk Familjebåt, NF.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundazed Records logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thanhouser Company logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK: size requirement does not apply to .SVG files. --Peulle 21:01, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! W wordmark 16 bn.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:16, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangladeshi four years old girl smiling (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question - Where's the personality warning? -- Ikan Kekek 12:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)  Done --Moheen Reeyad 20:47, April 6, 2017‎ (UTC)  Support - Adequate quality, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek 20:24, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postbox at Chittagong University Sub Post Office (02).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 14:58, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

No source to deletion request

What was the point of switching files like File:No Comando.png from the no source tag to a normal deletion request? Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Shahbag Square (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK4QI, coud be sharper though. NB: no need to attribute yourself --A.Savin 12:18, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agrabad Deba, aerial view, west.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:19, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hotel Agrabad, south axis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Office and training building, Zilla Shilpakala Academy, Chittagong, north exposure, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chittagong University Sub Post Office.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good and useful. Yann (talk) 22:08, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Govinda Gunalanker Hostel at University of Chittagong (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 18:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Photographs of Sri Chinmoy, 1980s.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Zamor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 19:57, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Category naming

Hi there, with this edit, you moved "Organisations of New Zealand" to "Organizations of New Zealand", that is you replaced New Zealand spelling with its American equivalent. Since I create a lot of categories on Commons, but don't really know much of the relevant policy and could also not find anything that outlines what to do, could you please point me to where I can read up on category naming conventions? Much appreciated. Schwede66 07:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Schwede66: Thanks for your question. Here, in commons, the main category also spelled in American form Category:Organizations. See also: COM:REDCAT. And sorry for late reply. :) ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keane Bridge, south-north axis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 17:35, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Keane Bridge, north entrance.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:41, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 17:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Straddle carriers in Port of Chittagong, at work.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ivanhercaz (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sikander Lodi's Tomb Wall Mosque, Central Mihrab.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Piazza Venezia

Why do you mess up with things you seem to know little about? You must not mislead other Wikicommoners. -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 13:01, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

Why have you deleted photo?

Why have you deleted photo of Asrahs-main_building-Fahad.jpg?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by FAHAD CARE (talk • contribs) 12:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@FAHAD CARE: See here. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:20, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

On deletion of file: "Per bruixa i metzinera la cacera de bruixes a catalunya.jpg"

Hey,

I am new on Wikipedia/Wikimedia commons. I'd just uploaded this picture to link to a wikipedia page that I was editing. I'd like to know why it has been deleted.

Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elgatgroc (talk • contribs) 13:39, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

@Elgatgroc: This file was Copyvio from external source. See COM:L. Thanks. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 13:44, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Scope DRs

Whoa, wait a sec, is "out of scope" now one of the reasons for speedy deletion? ★ Poké⁹⁵ 08:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

@Pokéfan95: Issues are might be depends on COM:PS. Can you specify where you feel it was irrelevant? ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:35, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

One example of a DR that should not be speedily closed for being out of scope (without an educational purpose) is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steve Weingroff.jpg. Although it is out of scope today, it may not be the case tomorrow. The image may be used on Wikipedia, but there was no file usage, so that's why I filed a DR. Such DRs like this should not be speedily closed, unless it is a copyvio or is inappropriate per COM:CSD. Thanks, ★ Poké⁹⁵ 04:23, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Deshnetri Begum Khaleda Zia Hall, University of Chittagong, north exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:26, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Teachers' dormitory, University of Chittagong.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:14, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raja-Kunjo, Museum of Rajas', north exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - Too general a scope in my opinion. Please give a specific scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Maybe put "entrance"; But for me the scope is not bad. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Raja-Kunjo, Museum of Rajas' to Raja-Kunjo, Museum of Rajas', north exposure ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Ok for, me Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:45, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support per Archaeodontosaurus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:50, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Screenshot_El_Marino_digital_12_mayo_2015.jpg

Hi Moheen, the picture you have deleted was uploaded by the copyright owner, so I urge you to restore it. --201.215.141.30 15:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, FYI, this file was copyvio screenshot. See COM:L. Thanks. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Moheen, it was no copyvio, the image was uploaded by the website owner... it's his copyright!! --201.215.141.30 15:59, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

OK, I think, now you should ask about that through the COM:VP. Regards. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Instead of just going and deleting it with no previous warning, you should have read it was indeed uploaded by the owner. You should restore it. --201.215.141.30 16:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@Lomita: @Yann: --201.215.141.30 16:24, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

You should know that, I was resorted (see history) that once, and after a while it was deleted again for the same perpose. Regards. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, We would need the source and permission for each of the images, but this is probably out of scope. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

@Yann: it was used in a sco.wikipedia article, so not out of scope. Please allow for a DR, at least. --201.215.141.30 16:38, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Chittagong (north-west axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dean's building, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Chittagong (north exposure).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:32, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Valued image removal

You removed the valued image tag from the File:Peary Chand Mitra.jpg while renaming it. Also deleted the nomination and discussion page. Link - Mar11 (talk) 08:34, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@Mar11: Fixed see File:Peary Chand Mitra (1814-1883).jpg. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:48, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Good to see. - Mar11 (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Dyasmin (3711971706).jpg

File:Dyasmin (3711971706).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 12:08, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shahjalal Hall, University of Chittagong (entrance).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences Mosque (front).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Unique in scope, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Administrative building, Institute of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, CU (north-west axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Kotka Beach, Sundarban.jpg

I don't get why have you speedy deleted this file. Even if actually it is outside the contest scope, it is not a reason for speedy deletion. The file should go through regular deletion process or just be excluded from the contest. --jdx ^Re: 08:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Jdx: You do not think it's a personal picture with a person standing? ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:07, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

For sure it isn't a classic selfie; face of the man is invisible. On the other hand it isn't a good photo for the contest due to this standing person. Either way, it does not qualify for speedy deletion. --jdx ^Re: 03:15, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Yeh, right. I restored that for COM:DR. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 04:25, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agrabad Mohila College (front).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 18:57, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Pierre Yves Gomez2.jpg

Hi,

I noticed you deleted this file dispites two resotrations. (Likely an oversight.) I just want too inform you that I have undeleted the file so this can be discussed via a DR. The person who nominated this file for speedy deletion acted a bit dishonest. Natuur12 (talk) 19:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

Delete

I had made a deletion request and I have noticed that you have deleted the images. But I seen you have forgotten to delete this image please delete this image asap --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 05:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

 Done ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 06:58, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion of Alnatura logos

Hi! Thanks for deleting File:Alnatura logo.png. Can you please take a look at File:Alnatura.svg, too? It's exactly the same. (I am trying to consolidate multiple logo uploads by another user.) Thanks for your help. --Kleinkleckersdorf (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, this was a mistake. --Kleinkleckersdorf (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

In generally in that case SVG is OK. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

File:MacKenzie Meehan (16202249986).jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mackenzie Meehan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 12:51, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Face of the Lion, Museum of Rajas'.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, but why isn't it called "face of the lion"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment The scope is not acceptable I suggest to add the place: Museum of Rajas' --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Face of the Lion to Face of the Lion, Museum of Rajas' ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

• @Archaeodontosaurus: You are right. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:41, 25 April 2017 (UTC)7
•  Support Perfect now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - I maintain my vote above and like this scope better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk class="signature-talk">talk) 20:57, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 13:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Entrance to Mercat de la Boqueria, shield.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:47, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - What does "escut" mean? Changed to "discussed" pending an answer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:29, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Escut Is the Catalan term for shield .It would be good to replace him. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

• Moheen, are you OK with substituting the English word "shield"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

• ----

Scope changed from Entrance to Mercat de la Boqueria, escut to Entrance to Mercat de la Boqueria, shield ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:43, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Comment I think it's better now! @Archaeodontosaurus: @Ikan Kekek: ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 07:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support OK for me. I hope you have eaten there is that you must eat in Barcelona.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Thanks. Looks to be best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:15, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agnes Nestor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 15:24, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:The meeting point of three roads One from Kotli Sattian, other from Patriata Top and another from Murree.jpg

Hi, you deleted the image but you stated "kept". Is it by mistake? --Saqib (talk) 14:08, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

@Saqib: Fixed. That was a mistake! Thanks for letting me know. Regards. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:34, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (north exposure, front).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 20:25, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mozeza Ashraf Monalisa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:27, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Alia Bhatt (03).jpg

File deletion warning

File:Alia Bhatt (03).jpg has been marked as violating policy, because it is considered unfree. This file has been, or will be soon deleted. The file is licensed under a license that does not permit unlimited redistribution, commercial use or the creation of derivative works. Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository, which means that unlimited redistribution, commercial use and the creation of derivative work must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for more information. If you want to ask permission from the author of the file, please do so using a template from Commons:Email templates. For images, you may find it useful to read Commons:Image casebook.

Images from Bollywood Hungama are only freely licensed if they are photos of a Bollywood party or event that were taken by a Bollywood Hungama photographer. This does not seem to be the case for this image which can be found in the Celeb Photos section of the website and is not credited to any photographer. De728631 (talk) 15:08, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

This applies also to the following files:

• File:Alia Bhatt’s connection with The Jack Rabbit.jpg
• File:Alia Bhatt’s Easter sweets binge session.jpg
• File:Angela Krislinzki (01).jpg
• File:Ayesha Kapur at thr promotional event of film Sikandar (12).jpg
• File:Deepika Padukone honoured with Entertainment Leader of the Year award in 2017.jpg
• File:Nidhhi Agerwal (08).jpg
• File:Shravanthi Sainath in 2016 (01).jpg
• File:Siddharth Kannan.jpg

De728631 (talk) 15:45, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

I would like to ask you to please do not delete or include in the delete discussions the files about 'my own country'. My country is one more micronation, like Liberland or Sealand (which are not real either, but nevertheless their archives, like shields, for example, are not erased, but those micronations have the same officiality as mine, so I ask you to Please do not delete or include it in delete discussions. Thank you in advance. Sincerely Deivid22 Gamer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deivid22 Gamer (talk • contribs) 09:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Locator-tool has been added to the gadgets

You can remove the importScript('User:Simon04/Gadget-locator-tool.js'); entry in common.js and enable it in your gadget preferences. – Simon04 (talk) 09:51, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Moheen Reeyad, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Template:Potd/2017-08-15

May I please know the reason, why you changed the POTD for this day without even asking me for approval? --A.Savin 17:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Hey @A.Savin: , I am just gonna let you! This is a vintage map of India, so it might look good for putting in 15th August cause of the country independence day. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:49, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Then I kindly request you to restore my POTD and to put your map on 2019-08-15, or you can ask Poco to free 2018-08-15 for you. There is really no reason to prefer the map for this data, especially without prior discussion. --A.Savin 17:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Oh! I have no problem to restore that. Thanks. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Would you please return all the templates to previous state? --A.Savin 18:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Did the rest for you. Really sorry to see this kind of ignorant behaviour. Please stay away from my pictures in future. --A.Savin 20:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

What do you mean Savin? It's a simple matter that I already restored all the templates. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:43, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Moheen, POTDs are translated months ago; so it is not good to change recent ones. As Alex suggested, you can ask Poco for the next year on August 15 or A.Savin on January 26. Most important; don't change without OP's permission. Jee 02:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletions

Hi, "Out of scope" is not a valid reason for a speedy deletion. Please create regular DRs. Thanks, Yann (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

OK and thanks for making replacement. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

merged DR

Hi Moheen, IMO it's not so good to just add the DRs for Category:Meta luu- The Grand Orthodox of Ort Art to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue d'Alfred Hitchcock (Dinard).jpg, as the latter is about freedom-of-panorama. I would recommend to create a separate DR for your request.--Túrelio (talk) 20:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Azim Khan's Tomb, Plaque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Central Shaheed Minar, Sylhet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:15, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mahara Bhaban (west-east axis).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 08:55, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
World Peace Pagoda (south entrance).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:54, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello

Hi, you closed Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Virajmishra as deleted. But you did not notice this edit of user where he removed two pics. You may want to remove that also.--Hindust@ni^{क्या करें? बातें!} 19:39, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

@हिंदुस्थान वासी:  Done. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:00, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

GQ

Dear Moheen Reeyad! Can u upload photo of Jackie Shroff in GQ Best Dressed Men 2017 or GQ Awards 2014 from Bollywood Hungama? Thank u! --217.66.157.3 08:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shadhinata Complex Revolving Tower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful, by far best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tile mural, Nazrul Square.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Only photo of the full mural on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:08, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:38, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tsisson97

Just an FYI you missed one of the images. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

@Mattbuck: Opps! :) ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 11:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Recent deletion

You hastily deleted File:AMA Lessig and Wales 11899764 878342075584040 5481160341912772669 n.png.jpg before I even had an opprotunity to reply. The image itself had a right-hand watermark crediting/ identifying it as the CC 2.0 work of Joi Ito. There was not a licensing problem warranting such swift deletion.SecretName101 (talk) 20:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

@SecretName101: The File was copied from facebook and the initial author mentioned 'Lawrence Lessig presidential campaign, 2016'; that represents the file was a clear Copyright violation. You are welcome to upload an original version with an OTRS permission from the original author. ~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Uploads from David Stang

ich denke nicht, dass es copyvios waren. Liebe Grüße, Hystrix (talk) 20:21, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Hystrix: Welches, können Sie diesen Link, bitte? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:29, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

[1] and [2] Hystrix (talk) 20:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Hystrix: Meine Entschuldigung. Dank für Ihr Sorge. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:50, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Elephant statue (face), Butterfly Park Bangladesh.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - I'm supporting this nomination because it's useful and the only photo in scope, but I think you could take a photo that illustrates this subject better, for example by not cropping out part of one of the tusks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleted file orth_1.jpg

Hi Moheen,

While trying to sketch a new Wikipedia page for a music band from my hometown, I accidentally ended up publishing it and several issues rose up, the deletion of this picture among them (on Aug, 5th) by you. I finally learnt how to use my workshop to that end and have been doing it since then, but when I try to properly upload the picture again -now properly licensed to be used in Commons- it won't let me because all the previous messing. Could you please help me with this matter?

Thanks so much and sorry for all the inconveniences.

Gabriel

Lacadena (talk) 10:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

@Lacadena: COM:Licensing can help you for the basic licensing rules, and OTRS can help you to publish files with appropriate legal permission which are created by others. Cheers! ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:18, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Jackie Shroff at the GQ Awards

Dear Moheen Reeyad! Can u find and upload photos of Jackie Shroff in GQ Best Dressed Men 2017 or GQ Awards 2014, or from last party in Mumbai from Bollywood Hungama? Thank u! --89.110.22.127 15:06, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

 Done File:Jackie Shroff at the GQ Best Dressed Awards 2017 (10).jpg ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 17:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Please close Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Quan_Zhi_Fa_Shi.jpg

Hi, thanks for deleting File:Quan_Zhi_Fa_Shi.jpg, but I created Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Quan_Zhi_Fa_Shi.jpg by accident before, so please close this deletion request. Thank you. --dqwyy (talk) _{from zhWiki} 15:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

@Dqwyy:  Done ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:19, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

 Thank you. --dqwyy (talk) _{from zhwiki} 15:20, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Deleted photo

Hey Moheen Reeyad, why did you delete the File:RubénGiustinianiPerfil.jpg from Ruben Giustiniani's page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by IgualdadyParticipación (talk • contribs) 20:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

@IgualdadyParticipación: It was Copyright violation, tagged by Secondarywaltz. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:58, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Not sure if I'm wrong

Hello, I see you deleted File:Bill_Elvis_Paul.jpg, I've been having a conversation on EN-WP here and I'm having seconds thoughts about the information I gave the user. Am I incorrect or just confused ? - FlightTime (open channel) 20:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shivshakti Sachdev.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:33, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Jackie Shroff

Dear Moheen Reeyad! Can u find and upload photos of Jackie Shroff from parties from Bollywood Hungama of Times of India photogallery? Thank u! --92.100.195.179 18:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Nusrat Faria Mazhar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info In my opinion too much makeup to see her real "face".  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Best portrait of her  — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 21:05, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. DeFacto (talk). 18:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Category:Valued images of women

Hi, Please do not remove this category. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

@Yann: Per COM:OVERCAT. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:17, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, but no. It is easy to use Catscan to intersect categories, but it is impossible to browse all categories for finding all valued images of women. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks! ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:23, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Location Nagorno-Karabakh en.png vs File:Location Artsakh en.png

Hi! This rename was very controversal. This territory the place of the long-standing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan. See en:Nagorno-Karabakh for more details. "Artsakh" name is modern Azerbaijan name for this territory, but it is not controlled by Azerbaijan. Please revert this rename and improve categorization. In my opinion, these files and category should be protected from renaming (after improving last actions). For Artsakh may be created another set of maps - besides, the territorial boundaries of Karabakh and Artsakh are somewhat different (everything is complicated there).--Kaganer (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

@Kaganer:  Done Thanks for the concern. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 06:32, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bidya Sinha Saha Mim, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very problematic photo. I'm supporting it as useful, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment What kind of problem? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 15:36, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

• Overexposed or maybe overlit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment This is a really poor quality image. An often-photographed actress deserves better. Charles (talk) 07:43, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

• Charles, feel free to oppose on that basis if you like. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:16, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Kareena_Kapoor_by_year

Kareena Kapoor by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

154.146.177.168 17:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Apu Biswas, portrait.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:30, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

বিষয়শ্রেণী

ভাই, যেগুলো প্রত্নতাত্ত্বিক স্থাপনা হিসেবে নথিভূক্ত না সেগুলো জেলার প্রত্নতত্ত্বের বিষয়শ্রেণীতে থাকবে না। সেগুলোর জন্য বিষয়শ্রেণী আলাদা। এই উদাহরণ দেখলেই বুঝতে পারবেন। ~ Nahid ^Talk 17:28, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

ঠিক আছে। ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:53, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Ayesha Takia

Dear Moheen Reeyad! Can you fidn and upload photo of Ayesha Takia in 2017? I want see in wikipedia, how is she changed after cinema? Thank u! --78.37.250.224 16:54, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Ticket#2017090610016022

Hello, Moheen. My name is BON LUI. Would you help to look over my OTRS photo? Thank you! -- BON LUI (talk) 23:59, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

{{FoP-UK}} on File:A Stormy Night in Capel Curig (19963421572).jpg

You added {{FoP-UK}} to File:A Stormy Night in Capel Curig (19963421572).jpg, but as far as I can see nothing depicted in that photo (tree, clouds, rocks) could be subject to copyright anyway. Is there something I'm missing that means that freedom of panorama is relevant here? --bjh21 (talk) 23:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Fixed ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:31, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Makkah Madina Trade Centre, sorth-east exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support North-east view i suppose !? I see two same shots. --Mile (talk) 17:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Ayesha Takia

Dear Moheen Reeyad! Can you find and upload photo of Ayesha Takia 2017? If you find this photo, i will be grateful! Thank u! --95.55.99.147 12:46, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Disha Patani promotes M.S. Dhoni – The Untold Story (05).jpg

File:Disha Patani promotes M.S. Dhoni – The Untold Story (05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2405:204:E082:8D20:6644:73A2:937D:8C05 07:03, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Category:Culture_of_Bangladesh_by_location

Category:Culture_of_Bangladesh_by_location has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afifa Afrin (talk) 14:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bell tower, Church of the Immaculate Conception, Chittagong, north-west axis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:22, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Zunaid Ahmed Palak.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of the Immaculate Conception, Chittagong, front, west exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hoseni Dalan, south exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:24, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shapla Square.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment I would change the scope to Shapla Square (without aerial view). -- Capricorn4049 (talk) 17:34, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful. -- Afifa Afrin (talk) 19:05, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose for now, as I would insist on the scope change Capricorn4049 requests. This quite obviously is not an aerial view, but a view from a building. Indeed, we seem to see a blurry window sill in the lower left corner that damages the quality of the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:32, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from Shapla Square, aerial view to Shapla Square ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Info @Capricorn4049: @Afifa Afrin: @Ikan Kekek: ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 20:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Best in (new) scope --Capricorn4049 (talk) 20:23, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
• I  Support too. Thanks for changing the scope, Moheen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Jurors for WikiScienceCompetition 2017

Hi, sorry to bother you. I am helping to organize the Wiki Science Competition, I don't know if you see my messages on various village pumps.

I see from a petscan query that you are wikimedian but also a good photographer. Would you like to join as a juror? I have gathered almost all the various academic profiles necessary, some of them are also photographer in their free time, but I need someone more into that aspect. Plus, there is always some missing country. I have nobody from Bangladesh, for example.

We are thinking of adding two additional main jurors, but this depend on the final arrangement and profiles. So, in principle is a second-level juror.

But we can keep your name for next time, with pleasure!

We start in few weeks, but international jurors work later, from January 2018.

In any case I hope you can spread the news around. Let me know.--Alexmar983 (talk) 07:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Mimsy Farmer.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Can you please explain what on this black-and-white picture is better than on this picture? --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment This portrait is good quality with resolution than other. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 05:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support I agree, quality is better --Capricorn4049 (talk) 10:11, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Best in scope. IMO no contest with the poor-quality color photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:14, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:25, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chuna Khola Mosque, north exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support scope makes sense and picture is best in scope --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radisson Blu Chittagong Bay View, south exposure, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Garlic-Chicken balls, cooked.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Useful scope and picture --Capricorn4049 (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not a useful scope. Charles (talk) 10:36, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Question - Why not? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

• Because there is no accepted norm for what Garlic-Chicken balls look like and we shouldn't pretend there is. This particular out-of focus image, for instance, shows some green bits. And can you see the garlic?! Charles (talk) 16:22, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:27, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Folk Art and Craft Museum, Sonargaon, south exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Clearly best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support I think this one is the better of the two.--Peulle (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Folk Art and Craft Museum, Sonargaon.jpg: -2 (current VI within same scope)
2. Sonargaon Folk Art and Craft Museum (31000427270).jpg:  3 <--
=>
File:Folk Art and Craft Museum, Sonargaon.jpg: Declined and demoted to VI-former.
File:Sonargaon Folk Art and Craft Museum (31000427270).jpg: Promoted. <--

---- DeFacto (talk). 17:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

File:The Miller Blues Band San Francisco - Jan. 10, Tues.-Jan. 15, Sun. - Matrix - Fillmore near Lombard.jpg

File:The Miller Blues Band San Francisco - Jan. 10, Tues.-Jan. 15, Sun. - Matrix - Fillmore near Lombard.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Passageway in Ruplal House.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:23, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Pauline Markham.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Try vio-violet a new Lundborg perfume (2015646922).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Try vio-violet a new Lundborg perfume (2015646922).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Night (2011645906).jpg

File:Night (2011645906).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2405:204:E287:B29B:F4DF:A6D8:63C8:9ACE 16:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

About your deletion fo Gülse_Birsel.jpg

Hi,

Could you please tell how did Gülse_Birsel.jpg violated a copyright?--❣Paseyn ^msg 18:46, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

You may click more and inspect the pop-up, it's CC-BY. https://vimeo.com/166229748 --❣Paseyn ^msg 18:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the restore, but the first version (year 2008) of the image is unrelated to the others and probably a copyright violation. Could you please take a look at it? Thanks. --❣Paseyn ^msg 20:55, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart (26830468653).jpg

I started a mass deletion request for all interiors of the Stuttgart Stadtbibliothek as they are all unfree h-stt !? 16:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bangladeshi woman celebrating Pohela Boishakh festival (13915503209).jpg

And also:

• File:Little butterfly (19698465884).jpg
• File:Pahela Baishakh costumes (8693805564).jpg
• File:Pohela Falgun (16623454072).jpg

Yours sincerely, Afifa Afrin (talk) 19:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plaque at Entrance of Chittagong War Cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajshahi silk fibers, Sopura Silk Mills Limited.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:35, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portrait of Armin Steigenberger.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope.--Peulle (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:21, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coconuts for sale, Puthia (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Basotxerri 16:48, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kalai Ruti making beside Shyama Sarobar, Puthia (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 15:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Please Remove My Picture

Hi, Can you please remove my picture? This Picture. JomaIran^گفتگو 11:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

@JomaIran:  Done. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 12:14, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! JomaIran^گفتگو 12:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shireeshtala, south-west exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:04, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Shireeshtala, west exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Question - I'm confused about what Shireeshtala is. w:Central Railway Building doesn't explain, and neither does your file description. I gather Shireeshtala is somehow associated with the Central Railway Building, but I don't understand how. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment @Ikan Kekek: I've added a short description. And thanks for your concern. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 10:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you. I copy edited your file description a bit, so please check it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:05, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unidentified ceiling in Panam Nagar (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could have been sharper and more contrasted. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 06:31, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sylhet Railway Station, front exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:16, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Artist Rashid Choudhury Art Gallery, front exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 22:17, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rajshahi silk fabric, Sopura Silk Mills Ltd (01).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I really love how the colour shows in all its nuances. --Kritzolina 19:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kalai Ruti, baking.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
• @Moheen Reeyad: Could you fix the undefined link of the image, please? --Basotxerri (talk) 19:26, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment Think it's fixed now, am I right? ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 19:45, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 21:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chittagong University Railway station (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chittagong University Railway station (04).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rajshahi silk fabric, dyed.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support I favour this one, since it shows the cloth both hanging and in a bundle, whereas the other one only shows it hanging.--Peulle (talk) 11:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Scores: 
1. Rajshahi silk fabric, Sopura Silk Mills Ltd (01).jpg:  1 <--
2. Rajshahi silk fabric, Sopura Silk Mills Ltd (02).jpg: -1 
=>
File:Rajshahi silk fabric, Sopura Silk Mills Ltd (01).jpg: Promoted. <--
File:Rajshahi silk fabric, Sopura Silk Mills Ltd (02).jpg: Declined.

---- DeFacto (talk). 17:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agrabad Deba, north exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 16:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2018! ;)

			* Happy Holidays 2018, Moheen! *
			Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Art gallery building, Zilla Shilpakala Academy, Chittagong, north exposure, front.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Auditorium, Zilla Shilpakala Academy, Chittagong, west front exposure.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cemetery Register, Chittagong War Cemetery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Useful and Used -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 07:09, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:18, 27 December 2017 (UTC)