User talk:MatthiasKabel/archiv

Old user talk until 2009

Corinthian Helmet

Hello Matthias. My name is John Harper. I'm working on a book project about ancient Greece, and I'd love to use your Corinthian helmet photo. Can you provide the image in a higher-resolution format? The original full-res photo file would be ideal. You can contact me at oneseven(at)gmail(dot)com. Thanks a lot. - July 10, 2006.

[[:Category::Roman Legion]] images

Please add these images in Category:Weapons or its subdirectories also where other user will expect to find such kind of images.

Note that your category name contains extra :. Good idea to include [[:Category::Roman Legion]] (or renamed one) into other category(s).

You could use {{GFDL-self}} tag for your images.

EugeneZelenko 14:29, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm changing it. The additional categories will be done later, I've to check them first. MatthiasKabel 14:50, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Autor

Hallo Matthias, wenn Du das Foto von der römischen Statue selbst geschossen hast, schreibe das bitte ausdrücklich dazu. Nur "Photo taken at ..." ohne ein "by" reicht eigentlich nicht aus für die Lizenz. Du kannst entweder "Photo taken by User:MatthiasKabel" oder "Photo taken by uploader" oder "Photo by Matthias Kabel" oder ähnliches dazu schreiben. Selbst nur "Own photo" wäre besser als das, da jetzt die Quelle fehlt und das Bild eigentlich gelöscht werden müsste. Das gilt natürlich für alle Fotos, nicht nur für dieses. Vielen Dank. --AndreasPraefcke 21:40, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Oops, das stand in der Lizenz? Hab ich glatt übersehen, sorry. Ich würd zur Sicherheit auf jeden Fall noch irgendwo den Autor dazuschreiben, da das schnell unübesichtlich wird, sobald mal ein anderer das Bild woanders hochlädt und das dann in der Beschreibung nicht steht. --AndreasPraefcke 22:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Terracotta figurines

Hi! Nice photos of terracotta figurines (e.g. Image:Terrakottastatue of young girl greece 3 century bC.jpg or Image:Terrakota Statue eines Makedoniers 3 Jhdt v Chr.jpg). Do you have more information about them, such as the museum they are stored in, the region of Greece they come from, etc.? Thanks in advance, Jastrow 09:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Salzburg Schloss Mirabell Zwergerlgarten Zwerg 17.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Salzburg Schloss Mirabell Zwergerlgarten Zwerg 17.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}}to release it under the GFDL or{{PD-self}}to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 14:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Image:Roman diatretglas.jpg

I have nominated this image for Commons:Quality Images. If you know of other images that meet the guidelines then please nominate them at Commons:Quality images candidates. Cheers, -- Infrogmation 14:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Ulan

Hallo Matthias, hast du den Panzer damals zufällig auch komplett? Das Bild, welches bisher bei ASCOD stand, musste nämlich entfernt werden. Vielen Dank im Voraus, --Flominator 14:02, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Ja, sind beide eingebaut MatthiasKabel 14:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Das nenne ich Service - vielen Dank! --Flominator 15:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Wikibooks povray while creating a helix.png and other

Please add license tags to all your images ({{GFDL-self}} in your case).

Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate category and optionally place the images on topic pages (galleries), or do both (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you.

EugeneZelenko 17:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

There is a license tag in the image description Permission: GFDL there is also a category. Where is the problem? MatthiasKabel 16:08, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Your equipment

Hi! May I know what lenses you currently use for your pictures, and specifically for this one? The picture itself is good but the noise could be reduced and there may be some distorsion due to the use of a wideangle. I own a copy of DXO, a software designed to correct these two problems, and I'd like to run your picture through it. Problem is the soft is camera- and lens-dependent. I know about yout camera thanks to EXIF data, but I still need to know which lens you used. Thanks in advance, Jastrow 16:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Camera: Canon 350 D , or digital rebell, this lens is a Sigma 20 mm 1.8 DG EX, thanks for the question, I like your pictures. MatthiasKabel 08:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Rats, the lens is not supported yet. Still, I'll try the noise reduction and white balance. Nice pictures from Lecce btw, I see we both went to Italy for our last holidays :-) Jastrow 17:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Franziskanerkirche Salzburg Gewölbe.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franziskanerkirche Salzburg Gewölbe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--Pko 14:38, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Boxer of quirinal.jpg

Hi! Would you have more information about this sculpture? The “original” is stored in the palazzo Massimo alle Terme and there's an article written about it on the French-speaking Wikipedia. Jastrow 12:38, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

There also an article in hebrew, german and a stub in english. I've added the interwiki links, except in hebrew. MatthiasKabel 17:11, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:Swarovski crystal glass bears.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Swarovski crystal glass bears.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Jkelly 18:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

A number of other images in Category:Swarovski also appear to be derivative works. Jkelly 19:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Swarovski crystal glass unicorn.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Swarovski crystal glass unicorn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Swarovski crystal world 3.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Swarovski crystal world 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Swarovski crystal world 4.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Swarovski crystal world 4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Swarovski crystal world1.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Swarovski crystal world1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Swarovski crystal world2.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Swarovski crystal world2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

This is an automated message from BryanBot. 14:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Bunte Götter

No problem, you can go ahead. You should note also that there is an ongoing discussion about their copyright status : so it may be wise to wait a little to see if they are not going to be removed ! Μαρσύας? 19:02, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Glyptothek

Hi,

I noticed you took several pictures in the Glyptothek, of very good quality. I was myself in Munich on February, and I did quite a bit work on this museum. Still, there are missing photos, or photos needing to be improved. I was wondering if you could help, by filling the gaps.

Also eine Frage, daß mich nicht in Ruhe lässt: was is »Hochtoupierte«? Ich kann es nicht finden in meinen Worterbuch, so habe ich eine schlecht Übersetzung geschrieben: « coiffures hautes », “raised hairstyles” (das betreffende Bild).

Tchüß. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 20:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

My dictionary says teased, but I will ask around (I've relatives in the USA) Admirable work your inventory, I live now in Salzburg, but I will take your list at my next trip to Munich and try to complete it. MatthiasKabel 20:15, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

OK, danke. Jetzt muß ich die Antikensammlungen anfangen! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 20:36, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Ach was! Danke trotzdem! Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 13:44, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Museums

Hallo,

Jastrow und ich haben diese Projekt anfangen, um die Probleme und die Lösungen zu teilen, für die Leuten, die um die Museen arbeiten. Als du in diesem Fall bist, wirst du vielleicht interessiert. Es ist keine offizielle Einführung, im Augenblick warten wir besonders Kommentare ab. Bibi Saint-Pol (sprechen) 12:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Gutsy Gibbon Wallpaper

Hi,

I have made a wallpaper for Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon using as a source [your picture]. The wallpaper in various sizes can be found on [Gnome-Look.org]. I released it under your same multi-license (GFDL and Creative Commons CC-BY 2.5). I hope you like it.

Best regards,

Iñigo Alonso (inigoalonso AT inigoalonso DOT com) 18:23, 4 November 2007

Image:Poseidon Of Cape Artemision.jpg

Hallo Matthias, gerade sehe ich, Du hast mein Bild bearbeitet. Gut gefällt mir, daß man die Textur der Bronze noch besser sieht. Meine Version war wohl etwas zu dunkel. Die Farben der Wände sind mir aber fast etwas zu knallig und links sind die Lichter ausgefressen. Ich hab' an dem Photo schon ewig rumgemacht, aber das waren damals ganz schlechte Aufnahmebedingungen, ohne Blitz mit angehaltenem Atem und das Fenster links oben hinter der Figur versteckt.. Schönen Gruß, --AM 13:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Peripteros-Plan-Naos-bjs.svg

---

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 09:24, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:1664 - Salzburg - Festung Hohensalzburg - Maschinengewehr M42.JPG

Hi, I've delete the category "Festung Hohensalzburg" from the mentioned image. The gun is indeed in the fortress, but nobody expect photos of individual modern guns when looking for pictures of the fortress. Perhaps we can create a category "Museum in the Festung Hoshensalzburg" or "Rainermuseum in Hohensalzburg" and cat all these images with the new category. MatthiasKabel 15:31, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

I was actually thinking of doing that very same thing, but laziness got the best of me. I've broken up the category into exterior, interior, and within the latter: museum. Danke! --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 18:14, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Roman pugios

Thank you for posting up pictures of Roman pugios and their sheaths. I notice though that some of the images are of incorrect reconstructions and some of the dating is wrong.

There is no evidence for any genuine Roman dagger sheath having had brass or other copper-alloy plates attached to it. The widespread misconception that these existed is due to a photograph which appeared in a book by Dan Peterson (The Roman Legions Recreated in Colour Photographs. The reconstructed sheath in that photograph was based on a line drawing of a sheath from Kempton which was actually an iron sheath decorated with inlaid silver and decorative rivets. The reconstructor mistood the silver inlaid borders of the decorative fields in the drawing for the edges of plates and mistakenly made his reproduction with rivetted-on brass plates. Therefore any reproduction Roman sheath you see with these added brass plates is incorrect and should not be featured.

As to the dating, to date the only daggers which have been found in second century contexts are the grip plate of a handle from Bar Hill in Scotland and a dagger from Buciumi. There is also a sculpture showing a soldier with a dagger dating to early in the second century AD. Most of those you feature as second century daggers are actually deifitely first century daggers and sheaths, including those form Carnuntum.

Paul Geddes (AKA Crispvs on Roman Army Talk)

Thanks for your hint. I've checked my photos, they were taken in the museum of Carnuntum and the description of the museum said middle of 1. century to end of 2.century. (I've taken photos of the description also) MatthiasKabel 21:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Provacator

Hello. Please, say in English, what I see in this photo: Image:Provacator 01.jpg. Is this a winner of some tournament? Thank you. --AKA MBG 18:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Done MatthiasKabel 11:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I have used it in Russian Wiktionary: wikt:ru:пальмовая ветвь and wikt:ru:пальмовый. --AKA MBG (talk) 20:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Grabstein Titus Calidius Carnuntum.jpg

Dieser Grabstein befindet sich in der Antikensammlung des Kunsthistorischen Museums. Du hast den Stein - für das Bild - rot eingefärbt. Er ist im Original aus weißem Leithakalkstein. Ich möchte das Bild für "meinen" Artikel Kaisersteinbruch, Steinbrüche, verwenden. Darf ich es farblich bearbeiten? Freundliche Grüße von Helmuth Furch 16:40, 19. Juli 2008 (UTC)

Hallo, ich habe den Stein so wie abgebildet im Museum in Carnuntum fotografiert. Da stand nichts von einer Einfärbung. Wenn das Original aber weiß ist, dann bitte ich um eine Korrektur. MatthiasKabel (talk) 08:15, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cebus apella 01.jpg

Hello. I have a question on the above photo of yours. Could you specify the (sub)species name?; I mean I wonder whether this monkey is Cebus apella apella or C. a. libidinosus, or even another subspecies of C. apella. The reason I propose such a question is because C. a. libidinosus, C. a. nigritus, and C. a. xanthosternos are now distinct species from C. a. apella in most cases, and are frequently classified as C. libidinosus, C. nigritus, and C. xanthosternos, respectively; and because they are sometimes difficult for non-morphologists to distinguish based on their morphological features, due to their varied anatomy. Thank you. 122.130.50.32 03:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Hm, I had a look on the website of the zoo. Nothing more than in the description of the image. I will ask at my next visit. (Nothing planed rught now) MatthiasKabel (talk) 07:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your response to me. If you would have an opportunity to get such information (of course, I never intend to bother you to visit it again!), I would be happy if you would let me know it. I am Shaz in the Wikipedia Japanese. (I should add that the place the monkey was from would have the same signigicanse as her/his (sub)species name. We could probably tell what is her/his (sub)species name on the basis of such information.) Thank you. 119.238.57.41 03:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC) (=122.130.50.32 in the above)

The picture was taken in the zoo of Salzburg, Austria. I should visit it again, because I have new telephoto lens. ;-) MatthiasKabel (talk) 11:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chariot_terma_Staatliche_Antikensammlungen_1452.jpg

Was heißt hier bitte "Terma"? --WernerPopken (talk) 13:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Your help with Category:Römermuseum

hi there,

I see that you have uploaded some images like here Image:Jupiter dolichenus statuette Carnuntum.jpg where you removed the background. Very nice work. Do you think you could help out with some images here Category:Römermuseum? For example Image:Vindobona Hoher Markt-142.JPG, Image:Vindobona Hoher Markt-17.JPG, etc. Thank alot! Gryffindor (talk) 15:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Sure, but there seems a lot of work to do. I started withImage:Vindobona_Hoher_Markt-90.JPG, but some of the pictures are very noisy and some are out of focus. I will have a look and start with best pictures. MatthiasKabel (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I'll have to see what other name can be used, because the museum's name is not "Römermuseum Vindobona", I'll check. Gryffindor (talk) 19:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Perhaps "Römermuseum Wien" or "Römermuseum Vienna" od "Museum Wien Römermuseum", the last one would be the closest for the official name because it's part of "Museum Wien". MatthiasKabel (talk) 19:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Hm, probably something like that. Can you tell me what programme you use for your work? Maybe I can also familiarise myself with it. Gryffindor (talk) 19:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

For RAW workflow bibble from www.bibblelabs.com, but if I have a look at your picture there will be no need for this program. So, for editing gimp en:GIMP, it's a free software available for windows, linux and Mac OS. Main disadvantage is no 16bit editing, but is no issue if you get jpg from your camera. There are many tutorials on the web, a very good video podcast http://meetthegimp.org (english, but strong german accent). For cleaning up noise there is a very nice plugin greycstoration, noiseninja works also very well but it's not free. To clean up the background I use the magic wand or color picker to remove the most of the background after that I use a eraser with very smooth edges and "draw" the contour in a way that the edge is smooth after then I fill the background with the desired color. MatthiasKabel (talk) 08:19, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi there, I have been working with GIMP just like you advised me, however some tricks I still don't know. Do you think you could help improve these images here Image:Vindobona Hoher Markt-100.JPG, Image:Vindobona Hoher Markt-101.JPG, Image:Vindobona Hoher Markt-142.JPG, Image:Vindobona Hoher Markt-89.JPG? thanks. Gryffindor (talk) 01:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi MatthiasKabel, do you think you could help with this image Image:Vindobona Hoher Markt-142.JPG please? I'll leave you alone after that, thanks alot. Gryffindor (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Römische Öllampen

Hallo, du hattest Januar 2007 mehrere Bilder römischer Öllampen eingestellt. Kannst du dazu bitte ergänzen, wo du die Bilder gemacht hast? Wäre dir sehr verbunden. Danke. Marcus Cyron (talk) 21:14, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

erledigt MatthiasKabel (talk) 16:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Danke :) Marcus Cyron (talk) 22:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Am liebsten würde ich dich als Fotografen für meine Museumsbesuche mitnehmen. Mit meiner Hobbyknipse wird das meist im besten Falle mittelmäßige Qualität. Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Danke, das Objektiv ist ganz nett. MatthiasKabel (talk) 16:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, MatthiasKabel!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Tower Bridge southern tower and new buildings.jpg is uncategorized since 15 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:10, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
• Image:Paulus on Piazza San Pietro at night.jpg is uncategorized since 19 April 2009.
• Image:Großglockner Hochalpenstraße Fuscher Törl.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Elias cathedral Yaroslavl 05.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:View from Rialto bridge to southwest.jpg was uncategorized on 17 October 2009.
• Image:Panthera onca zoo Salzburg 2009 15.jpg was uncategorized on 26 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

RE: File:Untersberg panoramic view winter.jpg

Hi, Thank you very much for uploading this nice panorama, actually I nominated it 20 minutes after your final upload, by the way can you please add Geocode to your image, also you can vote if you like :), Thanks for your comment   ■ MMXX^talk  12:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

File:Girls enjoying cotton candy.jpg

File:Girls enjoying cotton candy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Lyzzy (talk) 11:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Bella Citta Roma

Superb photos.Many many thanks.Robert aka Notafly (talk) 08:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token 820c91a6b3595c67b538c135755ad8ce

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaisbergrennen 2009 Bergfahrt 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Commonist licenses

Dear MatthiasKabel,

As you might know Wikimedia is currently migrating from the GFDL to cc-by-sa-3.0. Wikimedia Commons is also migrating and we're down to less than 1500 files (started with about 1,8M files). Unfortunatly this number keeps growing because Commonist contains outdated license templates. You appear to be running Commonist, could you please change the following lines in your license.txt? You can also copy a new licenses.txt from here.

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} should be changed to {{Self|GFDL|Cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}

{{self2|GFDL|cc-by-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|GFDL|cc-by-3.0}}

{{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} should be changed to {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}

Can I also fix the images you have already uploaded by adding {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}}?

Thank you very much,--MGA73 (talk) 19:33, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem, I will fix it before the next commonist upload. You can change an image uploaded by me to {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} 11:07, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. The images should be fixed now. --MGA73 (talk) 19:59, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Noticed you uploaded some new images for us. Great! However license is not changed - example File:Panthera onca zoo Salzburg 2009 10.jpg. Was that the plan? --MGA73 (talk) 19:16, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:Vortex-street-1.jpg, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vortex-street-1.jpg. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)