Wikimedia Commons

Marcela

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Castillo blanco in topic File tagging File:Vantaa-kartta.png
Learn more about this page

My English is very bad! Please contact me only in English, if you don't speak German, Spanish or Czech.

Wergkeugkiste

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Ralf! Schoen, dass Du es nochmal mit Commons versuchst. War die (ueberfaellige) Reichstagsflaggenbildloeschung der Anlass?

Darf ich eine kleine Aendeung Deiner Toolbox vorschlagen? Hier ist seit iniger Zeit das Template {{Information}} Standard (mit Blick auf standardisierung und automatische Vorlagenauswertung). Eine moegliche Version wuerde so aussehen (Lizenz muesstest Du natuerlich Deinen Wuenschen anpassen, ich hab einfach meine eigene Vorlage genommen). 

{{Information
|Description={{de|}} {{en| }}
|Source=Own work
|Date=
|Author=Ralf Roletschek ([[User:Marcela]])
|Permission=See license
|other_versions=
}}

== Kamera ==
### LÖSCHEN NICHT VERGESSEN ###
*Canon EOS 5 mit Billigzoom
*Canon EOS 1Ds
*EXA Rheinmetall (Baujahr 1952) mit Meyer Optik Görlitz 3,5/35
*Pentacon SIX (6x6) mit Fisheye Arsat 30 mm
*Ricoh RDC-i500
[[Category:Rr-unsortiert]]
[[Category:Rr-objects]]
[[Category:Rr-towns]]
[[Category:Rr-natur]]
[[Category:Rr-persons]]
[[Category:Rr-bicycles]]
[[Category:Rr-stammtisch]]

== Licensing ==
### LÖSCHEN NICHT VERGESSEN ###
{{self|GFDL|author=I, [[User:Marcela|Ralf Roletschek]]}}
gemeinfrei mangels Schöpfungshöhe: {{PD-ineligible}}
Hihi, überall wird man beobachtet... Die Reichstagsbilder waren der Anlaß, der Grund aber sind zwei Frauen, eine hat mich überredet, die andere überzeugt und mit echt finnischer Lakritz bestochen :) Mit den Vorlagen hier muß ich mich erst beschäftigen, du kannst da gerne drin rumändern. --Marcela 15:21, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ /−

Hello Marcela!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 10:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply


Behalten oder können weg?

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Ralf, bist du an diesen alten Bildern File:02-06-06.jpg, File:02-06-041.jpg, File:02-06-03.jpg, File:02-06-01.jpg und File:02-06-02.jpg noch interessiert? Sie wurden wegen nicht-Nutzung speedy-markiert (nicht von mir). --Túrelio (talk) 22:17, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seit wann ist Nicht-Nutzung ein Löschgrund? Das trifft doch auf ca. 99% der Bilder hier zu? Sind Stammtischbilder aus Berlin. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 21:54, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ist es per se nicht und, wie bereits geschrieben, habe nicht ich sie getagt, sondern nur getagt vorgefunden. Allerdings waren die Dateien auch völlig unkategorisiert bevor User:Cholo Aleman sie entdeckt hat. --Túrelio (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ich verstehe schon. Und ich mache dir keinerlei Vorwurf, falsch das falsch rübergekommen ist. Von mir schwirren hier etwa 5000 Bilder rum, die nicht verwendet werden. Komisch, in der Mediensammelstelle wrd Unverwendetes gelöscht, auf .de ist das kein Löschgrund. Wo sollen denn Bilder sonst gesammelt werden wenn nicht hier? --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 10:30, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Momentan sind einige (anscheinend) Neue unterwegs und durchforsten den Bestand auf Bilder, die nach ihrer Meinung gelöscht werden könnten und taggen sie entsprechend. Häufig war deren Einschätzung schon richtig, weil zu dem "unbenutzt" dann noch "unbenutzbar" hinzukam, also so Bilder per Handy, von der Freundin/Freund oder wohl irgendwann mal für die eigene Userseite gedacht, aber nichtmal dafür benutzt. Deine hierbei erfassten Bilder, die ja alle schon recht alt waren, machten auf mich im ersten Moment etwas den Eindruck, die hat er mal irgendwann hochgeladen, dann aber eher vergessen. Um diesen ersten Eindruck zu bestätigen oder zu widerlegen, hab ich halt nachgefragt. Inzwischen sind sie ja sogar kategorisiert ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 10:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ich wollte mal in Wikiversity was zur Entwicklung der Digitalfotografie schreiben, habe es aufgegeben, weil ich nicht ausreichendes Materal aus den ersten Jahren gefunden habe. Da hätte es ein schlechtes Handy-Bild der Freundin auch getan. Wenn das sauber lizensiert ist, gibts doch keinen Grund, es zu löscchen. Es gibt nicht nur die Wikipedia, wo die Bilder möglichst exzellent sein müssen. Schon seit Jahren suche ich händeringend ein Originalfoto aus dem Jenoptik-Keks, dabei ist mir das Motv völlig schnuppe. Das Löschen ist destruktiv, auf .de gibts sowas nicht. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 11:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Was ist denn ein Jenoptik-Keks? --Túrelio (talk) 13:03, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Das ist sowas wie das Urmodell der bezahlbaren Digitlkameras, JD-11 oder so ähnlich, wie ie hieß, weiß ich nicht mehr genau. Sie hatte so , Auslöseverzögerung ziemlich genau die Größe eiines Kekses, fast quadratisch - nur dicker. Sagenhaft hoher Stromverbrauch, 640x480, Auslöseverzögerung mehrere Sekunden und abgrundschlechte Qualität selbst unter optimalen Bedingungen. Ich wwürde gern mal das Rauschverhalten mit heutigen Kameras vergleichen, bei 800% Vergrößerung ist das Motiv unwichtig. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 15:35, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Michaelpolanyi1-2.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michaelpolanyi1-2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Michaelpolanyi1-2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

–Tryphon☂ 13:29, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Forssmann-bueste.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:Forssmann-bueste.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Masur (talk) 07:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please help replace this outdated license

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:51, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


Hallo Ralf, kannst du bestätigen oder abnicken? --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Natürlich liegt eine Bestätigung vor, daß die Bilder veröffentlicht werden dürfen. --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 08:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Ist das rechts File:Wikimania2010Events0277.TIF nicht ...? --Túrelio (talk) 22:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:SecretaireVersailles.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
File:SecretaireVersailles.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Kelly (talk) 01:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Foto von Henri Desgrange

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Rolf, bei dem Bild von Desgrange steht einerseits 1892, andererseits in der Beschreibung, dass es von 1932 stammt. Was ist zutreffend? --Bernardoni (talk) 00:27, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Barnis.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Barnis.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Missvain (talk) 03:42, 17 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Aktfoto

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Ralf, ich würde mit obigen Bild gerne meine Wohnung etwas verschönern. Leider ist es zu klein, um es auf Postergröße drucken und rahmen zu lassen. Hast du davon auch eine hochauflösendere Version?

Liebe Grüße, Christian Paulus aka --Knut.C (talk) 13:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Nobel-medizin-forssmann.jpg

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Ralf,
wie du weisst, arbeite ich weiter an dem Artikel zu Forßmann - darin eingebunden auch dieses Bild von dir. Gibt es eine Möglcihkeit, die Spiegelungen zu reduzieren oder zu entfernen, ohne die Urkunde zu "beschädigen"? Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:15, 23 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Miss Arschgeweih 2006

edit
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Ralf,

im Artikel Arschgeweih findet sich dein Bild mit der Unterschrift "Miss Arschgeweih 2006". Beim Recherchieren dazu glaube ich herausgefunden haben, dass es Dutzende Miss Arschgeweih 2006 in Deutschland gab. U.a. von Jägermeister oder anderen Kneipen und Convents. Auf welchen Contest bezieht sch dein Bild - und kannst du die Information noch ergänzen? Vergleiche es mit einer Weinkönigin - da gbt es auch Dutzende in jedem Jahr in Deutschland - aber man sollte dann dazu schreiben welche Weinköniging (z.B. Baden, Mosel usw.) DIE Weinkönigign gibt es nämlich nicht, sicherlich genau so wenig wie DIE Miss Arschgeeih. Alberich21 (WP Deutschland) 88.69.213.107 10:54, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Das war Jägermeister im Awerk von Eberswalde. --Ralf Roleček 10:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 12:04, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Vantaa-kartta.png

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Vantaa-kartta.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vantaa-kartta.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Castillo blanco (talk) 05:50, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Marcela&oldid=432932467"