User talk:MagentaGreen/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

File:Lignum vitae in paradiso (text).jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deletion request probably for personal reasons

File:Lignum vitae in paradiso (text).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

MaxxL - talk 14:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Lignum vitae in paradiso.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deletion request probably for personal reasons

File:Lignum vitae in paradiso.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

MaxxL - talk 14:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

To-do-Liste

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo MG,
da ich jetzt weg muss, bitte ich Dich, kannst Du bei File:Bulgaria stadium Allianz.jpg das Datum entfernen, erforderlichenfalls an den Feinreglern drehen? ~~Fällt Dir ein guter Name dafür ein? Ich hielt es erst für ein Fußballstadion, fand nun aber andere Bilder, die sagen, es ist ein Sport-, Kultur- und Kongresszentrum.~~ --Tommes 21:56, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Could you lend a hand if you have time?

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi MagentaGreen, could you take a look at ths thread at the graphic lab: Commons:Graphic_Lab/Photography_workshop#Remove_glare.2Foverexposure_from_face_on_two_full-length_outdoor_photos? It's been there for two weeks but no one has assisted. i think it's a pretty standard request. Thanks very much, I appreciate it! Softlavender (talk) 09:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Image issue

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, could you add a background to your Planet Nine image, which is plain black and reduce it to 1 layer? See related discussion, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk#SVG_image_only_shows_background_in_detail_view.2C_bug.3F Thanks Prokaryotes (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

@Prokaryotes, I'm no longer active in this matter. Please contact Karl432

Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Michele Bravi Sofia Viscardi B.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deleted: In favor of higher quality versions

File:Michele Bravi Sofia Viscardi B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

XanonymusX (talk) 22:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Michele Bravi B.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deleted: In favor of higher quality versions

File:Michele Bravi B.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

XanonymusX (talk) 22:54, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Question

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hello there. Thank you for your help in clearing those photos. I wanted to know what program are you using to clean such photos? Thank you--باسم (talk) 14:57, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi @باسم, I use Photoshop. But Gimp is a good alternative and free! MagentaGreen (talk) 15:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, i'll look in to it

--باسم (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Deleted: per COM:PRP

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:٢ الشيخ حسين علي أبو سنينه.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:43, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Small text== Notification about possible deletion ==

Deleted: per nomination, caused by a fraud attempt of User:Icke Büns

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Commodore Amiga 1500 (gradient bg).jpg

And also:

File:Commodore Amiga 2500 (gradient background).jpg

Yours sincerely, Ubcule (talk) 14:55, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

To clarify; I transferred your updated version of these to a separate filename since they were significantly different from the original.

*After* I'd done that I came across evidence that the original uploader had ripped them off another site; see the deletion request for details.

Sorry that your effort was wasted with this, it's not your fault. But the source image was an obvious ripoff and I couldn't in good conscience leave it there. :-( Ubcule (talk) 15:01, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jesus-NtraSradeFatima-StaMargarita-BasilicadelaPiedad-BsAs-Argentina-may2016 B.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good for me. --Rbrechko 12:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Deine SVG-Dateien

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo MagentaGreen, du bereicherst Wikipedia mit vielen wertvollen Bildern; deine SVGs sind hervorragend gezeichnet. Du bemühst dich auch um gute Beschreibung und Kategorisierung - eine Kleinigkeit liesse sich noch verbessern:
Die Einordnung in die total überfrachtete Kategorie Valid SVG ist nicht so arg hilfreich. Anzustreben ist IMHO die Kategorisierung in eine sinnvolle Subkategorie, zB Valid SVG created with Inkscape:CoA oder ggf. Valid SVG created with Adobe Illustrator:Maps, die nicht so hoffungslos überfüllt sind. Um das zu erleichtern habe ich Vorlagen erstellt, siehe auch den Aufruf in zB deinem Wappen Flensburg 2.svg. Allerdings kann ich nicht sehen, womit die Bilder erstellt worden sind - vielleicht Inkscape-Hand? Als Verlegenheitslösung habe ich "Other tools" genommen, wie bei North Sea Currents.svg.
Es würde mich freuen, wenn ich dich überzeugen und zu detaillierterer Kategorisierung "bekehren" konnte! Mfg sarang♥사랑 07:03, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Das Eisenbahnunglück bei Remscheid

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ganz herzlichen Dank für die exzellente Bearbeitung von File:Das Eisenbahnunglück bei Remscheid (Sepia).jpg. Ich hatte mir nicht vorgestellt, dass das Ergebnis so zufriedenstellend sein würde. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Czech Weichai.jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deleted: per nomination

File:Czech Weichai.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Miniapolis 13:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HabHotelInmigrantes-jul2016 (retocado).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:14, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Geological time spiral

Latest comment: 8 years ago19 comments2 people in discussion

Hello MagentaGreen,

Do you think it will be possible for you to do the french version for the Geological time spiral ? [1] Regards, --Markov (talk) 10:34, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Sorry @Markov, my computer was broken - total loss! I'm now online back, but until all is running well, it may take a while before I can take care of edits again. Maybe in a week - Thank you for your understanding. MagentaGreen (talk) 11:46, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

No problem ! I hope you don't lose personal files on your computer.. there's no hurry. Thank you very much ! --Markov (talk) 17:24, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Markov, I just wanted to report again. In the meantime I was unable to solve the problems with my software. In addition, very unpleasant things on the German WP have happened and I do not know if I even want to participate in the project further. Maybe you should look for another editor. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 20:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Aïe ! I gonna wait few weeks. You'll tell me if you give up totally the project. And if you leave, maybe there is an intermediate file you can send to me (I could give it to someone else and maybe for him the work will be shorter than starting from 0). --Markov (talk) 21:51, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Hello ! Do you think you can finish the work on the geological time spiral ? Regards, --Markov (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Markov, please excuse me, I've displaced this a little bit. Your request woke me up and I'll continue to work.

Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 10:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Geological time spiral (fr).jpg

Hello again @Markov! You wrote, I should keep terms as „Époque“ and „Ère“, but there is one big problem as you can see in the preview at the arrow. The words are just too long! I don't know how to solve this. Is there no solution like in German?

MagentaGreen (talk) 14:11, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi ! thanks ! You mean it's too long to write "Époque Oligocène" ? Are there other terms too long ? --Markov (talk) 16:28, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

@Markov: Well, so exactly I do not know yet, but I don't like different font sizes for stylistic reasons too. I would suggest to make possibly necessary additions (like era etc.) in the article text itself. Would that be a possibility?

MagentaGreen (talk) 16:55, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

If possible I appreciate if the reader can see difference for era and epoch. You can write "Époque ..." if there is enough place, and just "Ép. ..." or "É. ..." if the box is too small ? Tell me if it fit.--Markov (talk) 18:56, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

@Markov: Another approach would be to distinguish it in color. Tell me what you prefer. Tomorrow more, but now I wish both of us a good night. Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

I think it's important to make appear the term ÈRE for era, but you can just pick another color for Époque to distinguish them from Période. In fact I don't see exactly how the result will be.--Markov (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

┌─────────────────────┘
Hi @Markov, the idea of using color but wasn't as good as I thought. But I have tried to achieve the best without Illustrator. The next version of Inkscape will probably also support gradient mesh, then it will be easier. If there are no mistakes, I will upload the file in the JPEG format.
Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 15:55, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks ! there are few mistakes, I finish to check. --Markov (talk) 17:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

"Formation de la Terre, il y a..." and not "Le Big Bang, il y a..."

"-1 milliard d'années" (without 's' on milliard)

Can you write the four first texts a little bigger ?

Forgot "Époque Paléocène" between -66 and -56 (not to confuse with PALÉOGÈNE)

Could you tell me if it's better,more beautiful, to write É. Holocène and É. Pléistocène (without the 'p'), or to write the two terms without abbreviation but on two lines ?--Markov (talk) 18:50, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, did you achieve the french version ?--Markov (talk) 23:05, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

@Markov: Last week I had a little accident and was unable to write back. Now I hope that everything meets your satisfaction.

Regards, MagentaGreen (talk) 14:58, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

It's perfect ! Great job, really ! Thank you very much ! --Markov (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Einladung zur Teilnahme an Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo MagentaGreen!

Du erhältst diese Nachricht, weil du bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 teilgenommen hast.

Auch in diesem Jahr beteiligt sich Deutschland wieder am internationalen Fotowettbewerb rund um Bau- und Kulturdenkmale. Bisher wurden bereits mehr als 18.000 Bilder hochgeladen – und wir würden uns sehr über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Noch bis zum 30. September 2016 kannst Du Deine Bilder hochladen. Alles Wissenswerte erfährst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Außerdem möchten wir Dich einladen, ab 12. September 2016 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese sichtet und bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Oktober tagt, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 in Deutschland.

Für Rückfragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite oder unter info wikilovesmonuments.de zur Verfügung.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams
(DCB, 18:47, 8 September 2016 (UTC))

File:Kim Phuc (Trang Bang, Vietnam 1972 ).jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Kim Phuc (Trang Bang, Vietnam 1972 ).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

--sasha (krassotkin) 08:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Nick Ut (AP staff photographer 1970).jpg

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Nick Ut (AP staff photographer 1970).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Elisfkc (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Crispin

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Moin. Vor einiger Zeit bin ich auf die vier https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Corpus_Mittelalter_Schleswig-Holstein_Vol._1Nr._050 gestoßen, hatte sie aus dem Dunkel ins Licht gebracht. Da dies missfallen hatte, hatte ich dies gerade zu revidieren. Da ich von deinem Können einst schwer beeindruckt war, fragte ich mich, ob du einmal einen Blick auf die vier Bilder werfen könntest. Vielleicht lassen sie sich verbessern.--1970gemini 21:16, 9. Okt. 2016 (CEST)

Hi @1970gemini, viel wird man bei der Qualität nicht rausholen können. Ich werde aber versuchen, etwas an der Schärfe zu drehen. Dein Einverständnis vorausgesetzt, werde ich die Ergebnisse ausnahmsweise direkt drüberladen; trotzdem wird das aber wohl 1-2 Tage dauern. Gruß, MagentaGreen (talk) 08:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

@1970gemini: Die Änderungen waren jetzt doch zu umfassend, da wollte ich die Originale nicht überschreiben. Bist Du mit dem Ergebnis einigermaßen zufrieden? MagentaGreen (talk) 11:24, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Zufrieden? Ich bekomme das Kinn vor Begeisterung gar nicht mehr hoch.--1970gemini 15:21, 11. Okt. 2016 (CEST)