Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Módis Ágnes Vadszederke!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | /−

Archive

Autopatrol given

edit
 

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 21:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Gratulálok! További jó munkát kívánok. Üdv:Tamba52 (talk) 07:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Péter Vasvári 2011.jpg

edit
 
File:Péter Vasvári 2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pallerti (talk) 17:01, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Vasvári Péter kép

edit

Szia, bocs a fenti sablonüzenetért, bot küldte, mert véletlenül törlés sablont tettem a képre. A képet kicseréltem az új változatra, illetve a cikkekben is frissítettem a linkeket. --Pallerti (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Miklos Vamos.JPG

edit
 
File:Miklos Vamos.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 23:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:MullerPeter.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:MullerPeter.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:MullerPeter.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Pallerti (talk) 10:59, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Információkérés folyamatban.   Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 17:14, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

A weboldal tulajdonosa szerint, a kép szabadon felhasználható sajtófotó, melynek szerzője ismeretlen.   Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 21:11, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nekem nem tiszta, hogy ki adta az engedélyt a szabad felhasználásra, ha a szerző (aki ezt az engedélyt megadhatná) ismeretlen. --Pallerti (talk) 21:18, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
A honlapok impresszuma meghatározhatja, hogy a honlapon található képeket miként kezelhetjük. A 2007-es állapot szerint nem volt akadálya, hogy a képet feltöltsük a commonsra. A mostani helyzet szerint viszont engedélyt kell kérni rá. Levelet váltottam a honlap főszerkesztőjével, hogy ad-e engedélyt a szabad felhasználásra, és ő ennek kapcsán kijelentette, hogy a kép nem az ő tulajdona, tehát nem adhat. Ő is felhasználta a saját oldalán, mint szabadon felhasználható sajtófotót. Mivel nincs odaírva, hogy ki készítette a képet, ezért a szerzője ismeretlen. A kép leírólapján ezért pontosítottam a kép jelenlegi felhasználási helyét és a johannes név helyett beírtam ismeretlen.   Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 23:21, 25 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:ModisAgnesVadszederke.jpg

edit
 
File:ModisAgnesVadszederke.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 19:09, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Mikoczy Ribarszki.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mikoczy Ribarszki.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 05:22, 1 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Hungarikusz Firkász: engedélyező bélyeg ismételten kirakva.   Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 15:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ismételt kirakásról csak akkor lehet(ne) beszélni, ha egyszer már kint lett volna a sablon. Azonban megnéztem a laptörtenetet és jól látható, hogy most került ki először a sablon. Egyébként ha már kint lett, csak valamiért lekerült volna róla, akkoe egyszerűen csak visszateszem, de sajnos -- mint mondottam volt -- eddig nem volt rá kitéve a sablon. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 16:07, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Kovesligethy rado szobor bp 2007 rn.JPG

edit
 
File:Kovesligethy rado szobor bp 2007 rn.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 12:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Regasterios: nyugodtan töröld ki, a szerzőt nem érdekli a kép sorsa.   Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 15:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Detre laszlo szobor bp 2007 rn.JPG

edit
 
File:Detre laszlo szobor bp 2007 rn.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Regasterios (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Regasterios: nyugodtan töröld ki, a szerzőt nem érdekli a kép sorsa.   Módis Ágnes VadszederkeMágika 15:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

File:Laszlo Kiss CV QRCode.png

edit
 
File:Laszlo Kiss CV QRCode.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Xia (talk) 13:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply