Kosun

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kosun!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 12 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ /−

Hello, Kosun!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Image:Полуостров Тарханкут.L36-21.jpg was uncategorized on 21 August 2009.
Image:Провинция Тогдер .jpg was uncategorized on 30 August 2009.
Image:Долина р.Альма.JPG was uncategorized on 3 September 2009.
Image:Шри Ланка. Негомбо. Рыбацкая лодка.JPG was uncategorized on 1 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Arabatskaya strelka 1.JPG was uncategorized on 19 August 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Church Audzhikoy.JPG was uncategorized on 15 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Image:Roads R-29 17.JPG was uncategorized on 17 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Biyasala4.JPG was uncategorized on 14 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:24, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Rechnoe 5.JPG was uncategorized on 14 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 17:14, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Zurichtal.jpg was uncategorized on 31 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:23, 1 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Полуостров Тарханкут.L36-21.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Полуостров Тарханкут.L36-21.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

--Insider (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Kashtany 6.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:41, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Otesh-Eli 1.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:55, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Ternovka 8.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:00, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Aviatsionnaja 5.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:56, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Marshal Meretskov street 3.JPG

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 13:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

категории, немного пояснений

Latest comment: 11 years ago11 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый вечер,

вот это [1] - неправильно. В категории возможны и фотографии путей за пределами станций. Соответственно и вот это [2] нельзя удалять. Откачено.

если вы создаёте новую категорию и с изображений удаляйте ставшие лишними [3], не забывайте добавлять их в новую категорию. Почему вы это в случае с Гражданской не сделали, мне не понятно. [4]

любая категории населённого пункта МО подлежит и проставлению в категории Settlements in Moscow Oblast [5], что, по-моему, логично.

--A.Savin 19:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

А по-моему - нет. Низшая категория включается в высшую - это логично. А в низшую и высшую - нет смысла. Ваши доводы не убедительны, не стоит плодить сущности.--kosun (talk) 03:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Что-то не понял, чтО для вас не имеет смысла. Можете пояснить? --A.Savin 10:09, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Включение во все категории. Должно быть в одной, которая включается в высшую: села в сельсовет, тот в район, район в область, например... Иначе каша получится, в которой ничего не найдёшь. --kosun (talk) 17:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Вот только район это район, а посёлок это посёлок. Поэтому Istrinsky District отнюдь не подкатегория Settlements in MO и ваша аргументация несостоятельна. Если бы существовала категория Settlements in Istrinsky District - тогда да. --A.Savin 17:37, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

И деревни, и сёла, и посёлки входят в сельские поселения. А они в район. Ладно, мы на разных языках говорим. --kosun (talk) 17:46, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

P.S. Кстати, Высоково — деревня. --kosun (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

На разных или не на разных, но право безвозмездно удалять нужные категории, как вы делали это с Гражданской и Стрешневым, это вам не даёт. Ещё раз такое увижу - буду расценивать как вандализм, со всеми вытекающими. А что касаемо района, то в категорию Istrinsky District (или любого другого района) могут входить фотографии, к примеру, церквей, улиц или озёр на его территории. То есть, категория Istrinsky District - это чисто по местонахождению объекта, в независимости от того, что за объект. А вот Settlements (или Villages, тут уж как хотите) - действительно только для категорий населённых пунктов, то есть, в отличие от Istrinsky, не по местонахождению, а по сути. Так что прошу создавать или изменять категории только в соответствии со здешней практикой и не создавать лишней работы другим участникам. Если что не понятно - обращайтесь ко мне за помощью, или просто оставляйте {{Uncategorized}} при загрузке файлов, рано или поздно это исправят. --A.Savin 18:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Угрожать только не надо.--kosun (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
лол, похоже, что вы мои разъяснения прекрасно поняли. Ваш вклад под наблюдением, повторяться нет смысла. Гудбай --A.Savin 18:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

А кто Вы такой, чтоб за мной наблюдать?--kosun (talk) 19:16, 3 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Gravornovo

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Hi! I created at the same time Category:Gravornovo (Istra district) and moved your files to this category. Is that okay for you? If yes, I´ll delete Category:Gravornovo. Gunnex (talk) 18:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Well, in the meantime I tagged Category:Gravornovo with speedy delete. Gunnex (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why do you want to delete a category with a simpler name and to keep a category with a longer name? --Michgrig (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Michgrig! Well, the longer name is not the problem. Category:Gravornovo (Istra district) specifies IMHO better the context as it might be that something else in named "Gravornovo" (which may create confusion). Of course I checked Category:Istrinsky District and I noticed that the most categories are configured in a similar way. But I do not oppose if you want to keep Category:Gravornovo --> it was nearly a simultaneous creation of both categories :-). Just give me a sign and I´ll move back the files... Gunnex (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I do know that names that can be ambiguous must contain additional words in parentheses, even if there is only one article/category with the same name at the moment. The thing is that Gravornovo is not a common name and it's very-very unlikely there is another place bearing this name. Therefore, it would be better if you restored Category:Gravornovo, moved files to it and sent your category for deletion. Thanks --Michgrig (talk) 07:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Done. --Gunnex (talk) 08:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Church Eremeevo

Latest comment: 10 years ago9 comments2 people in discussion

Послушайте, я уже к вам неоднократно обращался, чтобы вы либо работали с категориями в соответствии с правилами Викисклада, либо предоставляли это делать тому, кто в этом разбирается. Вы упорно всех игнорируете. У категории на Викискладе не может быть названия "Church Eremeevo", потому что это откровенно неграмотно. Здесь не может быть по той же причине категории "Troitskaya Istrinsky District". Правильные названия - "Church of the Ascension of Christ in Eremeevo" и "Troitskaya, Istrinsky District" (или "Troitskaya (Istrinsky District)"). Среди создаваемых вами категорий таких случаев пруд пруди, и это уже попахивает откровенным вредительством. Так что пусть это будет последним предупреждением. Я сейчас всё исправлю, но впредь на такие акции буду накладывать временные блокировки. --A.Savin 14:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Вы отбиваете охоту работать: наматываешь сотни километров (пешком), тратишь кучу денег, чтоб снять деревни, до которых никому дела нет, а за это санкциями угрожают. Не владею я английским, чтобы понять, что требуется. Не нравится, правьте, только в статьях тоже исправляйте - я иллюстрации к написанным статьям делаю. Ну и замечания постараюсь учесть - что там гугл-переводчик выдаст. Вот здесь (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Церковь_Троицы_Живоначальной_в_Троицком_(каменная) какую категорию надо ставить? --kosun (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Не знаю, что за нравы у вас там в русской ВП, но здесь санкций за иллюстрирование статей не бывает. А вот за упорное создание неверных категорий - бывают. --A.Savin 15:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Вы сами же на вопрос и ответили. Значит, с английским у вас на самом деле не так всё безнадёжно? Вот только каменная Троицкая церковь наверняка есть не только в Истринском дистрикте. Исправляю. Вообще для категорий здесь нужен не столько английский язык, сколько здравый смысл. Обожаю товарищей, много лет воображающих, что-де за них всё сделают и здравый смысл им на фиг не нужен. --A.Savin 15:46, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Дело в том, что каменная - своего рода официальное название (http://temples.ru/tree.php?ID=1084) - рядом такая же, но деревянная.--kosun (talk) 16:23, 24 November 2013 (UTC) А с английским - объясниться, может, смогу, читать -совсем плохо, писать - никак. --kosun (talk) 16:28, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Просто добавляем wooden в название и получается Wooden Trinity Church (Troitskoe, Istrinsky District). Всё остальное не оправдание, вы уже создавали категории с верными названиями (Dukhanino (Istrinsky District) и др.), отклоняться от всепринятой нормы и отбрасывать скобки там, где они нужны, нет смысла. Есть и такая штука, как список наблюдения, по которому вы имели/имеете возможность следить, если какая категория оказалась неправильной и ваши файлы были перемещены, а потом создавать новые уже с учётом ошибок. Есть возможность обратиться ко мне или в форум за помощью. Да в конце концов, есть возможность просто загружать файлы без категорий, они оседают в Category:Media needing categories, их рано или поздно обнаружат и поправят. Никто вам теперь уже не поверит, если вы станете создавать категории а-ля Church Pupkino и потом отмазываться тотальным незнанием английского. --A.Savin 16:43, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ну, с сёлами просто, насчёт скобок - учту. Слова "wooden" гугл мне не выдавал и конструкцию Wooden Trinity Church я создать не мог никак, так что это не ко мне. А файлы без категорий - это вы за мной следите, сделаете, а мне самому сколько встречалось - годами лежат, за деревнями не следит никто, проверено.--kosun (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:Church St. Nicholas (Mansurovo) - в ссылке на базу данных ОКН речь идёт о некоей деревне Петрово. И вообще-то "Church of St. Nicholas". --A.Savin 20:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Это одно и то же. Название - такое гугл выдал. --kosun (talk) 04:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kizilovka

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kizilovka has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ /−

Mevo (talk) 14:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Хамовники

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Добавление сразу в несколько созданных вами категорий улиц района Арбат еще и в категорию Хамовники, при том что все эти улицы никогда и в жизни на территории этого района расположены не были, заставляет меня в энный раз диву даваться вашему раздолбайству. Постоянно обращаться к вам с просьбами наконец-то усвоить правила категоризации больше нет ни желания, ни толку. Еще одна подобная акция = блокировка. С меня хватит. --A.Savin 20:27, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Повежливей можно? Категрию я просто скопировал отсюда [6], если неверно - не моя работа. Категорию Beliy Rast Railway Station в Beliy Rast вы зря добавили - это довольно удалённые объекты[7], общее только название.--kosun (talk) 09:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Это как в том старом анекдоте про алкаша, который бутылку ищет под фонарем только потолму, что там-де светлее. Иными словами, надо не тупо копировать всё на свете, а еще и головой при этом думать; а ежели это не помогает - заглянуть в викистатью. Всё, дискуссия завершена. --A.Savin 09:45, 29 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

You have been blocked for a duration of 14 days

Latest comment: 10 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 14 days for the following reason: Vandalism: repeated mass creation of wrong named categories (or such with wrong overcats, wrong coords,...), after several appeals and warnings.

If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

العربية ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ Gaeilge ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ suomi ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ বাংলা ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

Всё, после просмотра ваших новых катиегорий последних дней вы мне выбора не оставили. --A.Savin 17:49, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Предоставьте, пожалуйста, диффы, приведшие к блокировке --Michgrig (talk) 13:01, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Заведомо неверные координаты в как минимум шести-семи категориях напр. [8] [9] и др. Заведомо неверные наименования для новых категорий периодически за последние месяцы [10], заведомо неверные материнские категории [11] [12] и др. Игнорирование всех моих просьб по этому поводу на данной СО в течение последних месяцев. --A.Savin 15:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

За последние два приведенных пункта уже было предупреждение, поэтому из рассмотрения выкидываем (за одну и ту же провинность два раза не наказывают). Ссылка на удаленный вклад лично мне недоступна, поэтому прошу привести эти некорректные названия в явном виде. --Michgrig (talk) 09:09, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Все категории, которые мне приходилось создавать заново, я физически не могу перечислить. Вот несколько примеров:

Category:Church of the Annunciation (Blgoveshchenye), Category:Demetrios of Soluneia (Dubrovo), Category:Academica Alexandrova, Category:Khutopki, Category:Fifth lane Ostankinskiy.

Насчет предупреждения позволю себе не согласиться. Если вандализм систематический, то блокировка налагается за все нарушения, а не только за последнее действие. --A.Savin 14:08, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Коллеги, я ознакомился с долгой историей ваших препирательств :) Простите, что только сейчас. Могу сказать две вещи: 1) мне кажется, что блокировка на две недели - это многовато; за таким действием больше эмоций, чем терапии. С другой стороны, я могу понять Александа и его раздражение, когда из раза в раз повторяются одни и те же огрехи. Всё что могу рекомендовать - быть внимательнее и лишний раз не спешить. На самом деле, здесь никто никому не враг, и ошибки - это тоже нормально. Просто старайтесь не наступать на грабли через раз. Тогда никто не будет прибегать к блокировкам. Понимаю, что всё общие слова, но ничего более по существу не могу сказать :) --Gruznov (talk) 12:22, 29 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ashlama-Dere

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Kosun, can you help me with understanding what "Ashlama-Dere" is? Is it the specific mountain visible on these images, or the valley between the mountains? is there a Wikipedia article about it which we can link?

And when you change the category like this [13], is "Views from Çufut Qale" wrong? Holger1959 (talk) 10:16, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The valley between the mountains. Crimean Tatar language Dere = ravine, valley. I do not know English, I use the Google-translator.--kosun (talk) 17:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Kamyshly

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день. Сегодня упорядочивала фотографии Севастопольского городского совета и наткнулась на 6 файлов, лежащих в категории Category:Kamyshly. В их описании указано, что это фотографии с. Дальнее, расположенного по соседству с с. Камышлы. Я перенесла их в категорию Category:Dalnee, но червячок сомнения меня всё же грызет). Подскажите, пожалуйста, если Вы помните, какое это на самом деле село?.Большое человеческое спасибо. С уважением, Stuchka (talk) 15:51, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

И еще вопрос по категории Category:Povorotnoe, файлы, находящиеся в ней носят название села Фруктовое, расположенного недалече, а в описании указано, что это с. Поворотное. Если это Поворотное, стоит переименовать? Stuchka (talk) 17:50, 15 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

М-да, в описании ошибка, это Камышлы, исправлю и файлы надо бы назад, в пустую категорию. Дальнее ещё не снимал, надо заняться как-то. А названия в Category:Povorotnoe, если хотите меняйте, значения не имеет хоть горшком назови... kosun (talk) 19:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

И опять - категории

Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Вы так ничему и не научились за все время. Создаете категорию с дебильным именем "Church Flotskoe", хотя перкрасно знаете, что по-английски это называется "Church of Saints Constantine and Helena", т.к. сами же и добавили эту категорию. Координаты - показывают на голое поле, а не на церковь. Мне некогда и неохота каждый раз за вами вылизывать. Кроме меня, этим не занимается никто. Вот то есть действительно, НИКТО. Сыграй я вдруг скоропостижно в ящик, вообще на все века некому будет ваш мусор подметать. Если я хоть еще раз подобное увижу, то блокировка будет уже на три месяца. Ябедничать можете потом кому угодно, хоть админам русской вики, хоть самому Ути-Пути. Ваши откровенно халтурные правки на Викискладе нежелательны. --A.Savin 22:18, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Переименую. --195.128.182.22 07:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Какое "переименую", если я это уже вчера вечером сделал? И кто вы вообще? Аргументов по существу, как всегда, не густо... --A.Savin 08:54, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Я — пишу статьи в википедию и , по возможности, стараюсь их иллюстрировать. kosun (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

За википедию я не отвечаю. Если чего, то пусть тамошние админы с вами разбираются. А вот халтуру и вредительство на Викискладе мне терпеть надоело. То, что простительно новичку, в вашем случае приведет к бану. --A.Savin 21:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Фотографии Орловки

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день!

Вы удалили из Orlovka несколько изображений, потому что на них изображено не непосредственно само село. Административно орловский пляж и прилегающие к нему территории могут не входить в состав села (хотя эти данные надо уточнить, может, это не так). Тем не менее кроме понимания Орловки в строго административных границах села существует понимание местности Орловка. В частности, пляж называется пляжем села Орловка, пансионаты у пляжа пишут, что находятся в Орловке (у пансионата "Звездный берег" адрес п.Орловка, Качинское шоссе, 33). Поэтому я считаю неправильным такое удаление категорий.--Юровский Александр (talk) 10:53, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Статья о селе, если будут АИ, что пляж и коттеджный посёлок относятся к Орловке, можно сделать в категории села отдельную категорию и соответствующе назвать. А пансионаты пишут - название на слуху, не писать же им пос. Осипенко, кто о нём знает, хотя он гораздо ближе. --kosun (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Category:Amurske

Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Доброго дня,

Чи могли б ви пояснити, будь ласка, чому ви вилучаєте категорії з цієї та інших категорій? Така схема категоризації притаманна для всіх категорій сіл України, можете, наприклад, подивитися будь-яку підкатегорію Category:Villages in Ukraine by name або категорію будь-якого іншого українського регіону, наприклад, Category:Villages in Donetsk Oblast або Category:Villages in Lviv Oblast. Прибирання вами категорій призводть того, що Category:Amurske повністю випадає з дерева категорій Category:Villages in Ukraine, тож, будь ласка, поясніть ваше бачення цього дерева. Дякую — NickK (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Приветствую. Получается дублирование категорий. Село входит в Category:Populated places in Ukraine by region, которая, через [14] и [15] включена в Category:Populated places in Ukraine by region. То древо параллельное. Впрочем, если очень хочется, можете оставить, разгребать и упорядочивать всё нет ни времени, ни желания. --kosun (talk) 16:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Добрый день. Есть два параллельных дерева: одно по административному делению независимо от статуса (Category:Populated places in Ukraine → Category:Populated places in Ukraine by region → Category:Populated places in Crimea → Category:Populated places in Crimea by raion → Category:Populated places in Krasnogvardeysky Raion), а второе по статусу (Category:Populated places in Ukraine → Category:Villages in Ukraine → Category:Villages in Ukraine by region → Category:Villages in Crimea). Аналогично сделаны все остальные регионы Украины. Я не настаиваю на том, чтобы вы упорядочивали, но, пожалуйста, хотя бы не убирайте категории из второго дерева, когда они уже проставлены. Спасибо — NickK (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
Пусть будут. --kosun (talk) 18:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Tavrida 5 plot 1.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

File:Tavrida 5 plot 1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: https://crimea.ria.ru/society/20171229/1113334008.html

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Mitte27 (talk) 18:47, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

ОК. Купился на ложную лицензию. --kosun (talk) 06:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Help:VisualFileChange.js

Latest comment: 6 years ago10 comments2 people in discussion

Подключите пока гаджет в настройках, зайдите на страницу своего вклада и запустите его по ссылке в левом меню Perform batch task. Что будет непонятно, покажу на скриншотах. Sealle (talk) 08:21, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Загрузил 4 штуки [16], дальше всё на инглиш… --kosun (talk) 18:24, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Тут всё по порядку. Sealle (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Что-то недоделываю, или недопонимаю [17]. --kosun (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Не телепат, без конкретики не догадаюсь, что именно не получается. Sealle (talk) 18:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Виноват, не глянул, что ссылка куда надо не ведёт. Вроде всё делал по инструкции, а не сработало - детальки какие-то, видимо. Подумаю, куда скрин прицепить (никогда не занимался). --kosun (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Дошёл до этого [18], а кнопка не кликается. --kosun (talk) 19:20, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Один лишний клик помешал. Судя по розовому фону, зачем-то нажали на /R/ в первой строке и превратили поиск текста в поиск регулярного выражения. Надо нажать туда же ещё раз, чтобы розовый фон пропал. Sealle (talk) 20:01, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Одна попытка в двое суток — не самый эффективный способ разобраться. Sealle (talk) 08:52, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

приболел, мозги напрягать не хочется. Всё посерело [19], но не сработало. --kosun (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Форос

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

По поводу этой правки. По карте левая часть залива на фото - Форос. --Butko (talk) 17:23, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Я вижу трёх молодых людей на краю скалы. Уверен, другие тоже. И кусочек чего-то на заднем плане. Вы админ, Вам виднее, но я подобное грузить бы вообще не стал. --kosun (talk) 18:09, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Aleksandr Elisov.jpg

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Aleksandr Elisov.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Aleksandr Elisov.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:05, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

wikimapia

Latest comment: 2 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Приветствую! Пожалуйста, в источнике указывайте не ссылку на фото, а на страницу, где фото расположено (пример). Спасибо. --Mitte27 (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Здравствуйте, прошу не игнорировать данную просьбу. --Mitte27 (talk) 19:48, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
- Понял, так даже проще. Только у фото бывают разные авторы, как быть? --kosun (talk) 17:12, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
  - kosun, что вы имеете ввиду? --Mitte27 (talk) 05:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
    - Да ладно, разобрался. --kosun (talk) 06:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Catherine Mile Uchkuevka.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Catherine Mile Uchkuevka.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Catherine Mile Uchkuevka.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Sahargolov 4.JPG

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sahargolov 4.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sahargolov 4.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Shturmovoe 2.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Shturmovoe 2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Shturmovoe 2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Novoulanovka.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Novoulanovka.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Novoulanovka.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:22, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Snilya riwer.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Snilya riwer.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Snilya riwer.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Sahargolov 5.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sahargolov 5.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sahargolov 5.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Sahargolov 2.JPG

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Sahargolov 2.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Sahargolov 2.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Vozrozhdeie 1.JPG

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vozrozhdeie 1.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Vozrozhdeie 1.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 08:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Северо-Крымский канал.JPG

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Северо-Крымский канал.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Северо-Крымский канал.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mitte27 (talk) 06:53, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Когда грузил этот файл и те, что выше, спрашивал на форуме АП: можно ли брать из Крымологии - ответили можно. Теперь нельзя? kosun (talk) 09:07, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Названия районов

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Добрый день. Название районов и населённых пунктов на Викискладе берётся из Английской Википедии. См. en:Nyzhniohirskyi_Raion. Пожалуйста, не нужно заниматься переименованиями. Спасибо. Mitte27 (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ссылку на пункт правил можно? --kosun (talk) 04:26, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Балкон санатории.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Балкон санатории.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Балкон санатории.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:05, 31 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Churuk-Su 1.JPG

Latest comment: 10 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Churuk-Su 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Yann (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

about wikimapia uploads...

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

please give me information about license of photos you have uploaded. are they really free licensed? in original links, there is no proof for free license.... but since you uploaded so much photos(about 16 thousand!) this is so much hard work for me. please give information about this before opening deletion request. thanks. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 07:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

ok, there is no problem about your wikimapia uploads. sorry for disturbance. https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&oldid=881575688#are_images_from_wikimapia_free_licensed? modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 16:19, 5 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Website glitch

Latest comment: 13 days ago3 comments2 people in discussion

While looking up a photo of Tamaraxonim I discovered a glitch in the website russiainphoto.ru, a website which you have uploaded photo(s) from. The link of a photo from the search results will change over time to different photos, meaning that the link in the photo is often to a different one after is it uploaded. Please take care to post the stable link in the source part instead of the unstable search results link. Trying to fix these problems is going to take a very long time for me, so please self-correct if you can. (ex use https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/21083/ for File:Петросян Тамара Артемовна.jpg instead of https://russiainphoto.ru/search/photo/?author_ids=319&index=7&page=1&paginate_page=1) - HistoryofUzbekistan (talk) 13:59, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Не понимаю. --kosun (talk) 15:46, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply
- Links starting with https://russiainphoto.ru/search/ are bad, links starting with https://russiainphoto.ru/photos/ are good. - HistoryofUzbekistan (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic