User talk:Kallerna/2015-2019

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page.

De-adminship warning

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Kallerna/2015-2019, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2015 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Työn sankari -patsas Monchegorskissa.jpg

Yours sincerely, Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Caption question

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, do you know which breed of dog is shown in this photo that you uploaded? Thanks, --Pine^✉ 17:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Nova Scotia Duck Tolling Retriever, as it is categorized. —kallerna™ 09:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Hallgrimskirkja interior 2016.jpg

Yours sincerely, Themightyquill (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Hippocrates' statue 1.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Hippocrates' statue 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

—Ah3kal (Talk) 15:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

File:Hippocrates' statue 2.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Hippocrates' statue 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

—Ah3kal (Talk) 15:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Dubai Miracle Gardens.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Copyright and use of images

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Moro Kallerna,

We would like to use this image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Pursilahdenranta,_kerrostalo.jpg in an ecommerce website as part of front page illustrations (we need an image of an apartment building). How would you like to be attributed?

Regards Tero Lahtinen — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 178.55.109.254 (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Kallerna,

I'm contacting you about the use of your images in my website (www.dixon.es).

I've got to admit that the different copyright and licensing agreements under which fotos are made available via Wikicommons seem a bit of a labyrinth to me, hence my contacting you directly.

If you have a look at the website you'll see that I've added a copy of your foto https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=11459341 to a slider on the home page.

I'm not a programmer, and fighting with websites is a real trial for me. However, I've got this far, and I'd like to know how you'd like me to proceed with a credit (assuming that you're ok about my using the foto in the first place, of course).

I did initially add a credit to the foto itself, but it looked really poor in the standard slider that I've used, so I removed it and added a "Credits" link on the main menu, with intention of listing all the fotos that I've used along with the corresponding credit and link.

So, before I go ahead, I'd like to have your feedback about the idea, and of course about the use of your foto.

Look forward to hearing from you

--Sattamassagassa (talk) 13:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

No problem, just use the photo the way you want. —kallerna™ 18:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Dubai Marina The Beach.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Dubai Marina The Beach.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Saqib (talk) 08:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:LuckyShoe Monument 1.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 09:30, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

AnikKhan.jpg

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello,

I am in the process of having the picture in question reviewed as I have obtained permission from the photographer. I went to place the {{OTRS pending}} tag in the talk page and noticed it was gone. Could you undo this by chance?

Study aide (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 closes on December, the 15th

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started

It is a world event.
The upload phase in Asian, American and European countries without juries ends on December 15th.
Here you can find more details.

This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).

#WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017

Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:27, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Niisku.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Niisku.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

AyaanLamar (talk) 13:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.

Dear Kallerna,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.

In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.

Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Korpisoturi.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Korpisoturi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Ju Ta 03:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bolivia 12.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bolivia 12.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter Island 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good but could you add a cat about horses (hint: icelandic horses) --Poco a poco 20:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro de Atacama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 12:36, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! San Pedro de Atacama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:36, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 18:15, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sol de Mañana 2018 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Fischer.H 18:20, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:18, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Question - What accounts for the weird purple color in the water? -- Ikan Kekek 17:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
According to enwiki it "is caused by red sediments and pigmentation of some algae". --MB-one 19:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek 09:32, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siilinjärvi Särkijärvi pit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chuquicamata 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 17:48, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kogelbaai from Dappat se gat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 16:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 05:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shark cage diving Gaansbai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter Island 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality but please add geo coordinates --Podzemnik 21:51, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vicugna vicugna Salar de Chalviri.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulders Beach 2019 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

Kuva

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hei Kallerna! Kuvan käyttöoikeudesta tahtoisin kysyä. Kuva koskee https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tikanheitto#/media/File:Tikkataulu.JPG

Saako käyttää jaettavaan materiaaliin? Singe -levyn kansi. Entä saako muokata? [email protected] — Preceding unsigned comment added by PoopiUtti (talk • contribs) 09:47, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 16:51, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatra Rysy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hevoset kesälaitumella 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Copenhagen airport from air.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec path 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 19:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morskie Oko 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hikers in Czarny Staw Gąsienicowy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:53, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frozen Morskie Oko 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:30, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kościelec view 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kościelec view 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FSCBot (talk) 18:05, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:34, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Armenak Margarian 14:40, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The nebula in the distance makes the image more mysterious :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvøroyri from Smyril 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:42, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvøroyri from Smyril 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 08:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hvannhagi 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support great qulaity.--Chianti 16:20, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 14:25, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sumba sheeps 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Is this also at FPC? I'd support. --Smial 10:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vágur 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Composition seems a bit vague to me, but quality is OK and the sun spot makes it a good image ;–). --Aristeas 09:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hvannhagi 9.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hvannhagi 9.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:05, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:25, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:26, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:03, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Suðuroy 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sumba sheeps 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:42, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Sumba sheeps 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sumba sheeps 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Kallerna/2015-2019,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:03, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Kallerna/2015-2019,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skúvoy helicopter 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carschten 11:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sandur aerial 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:32, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalsoy road 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carschten 11:45, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Funningsfjordur 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 05:53, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

File:Kópakonan.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kópakonan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 05:49, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalsoy Kunoy view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eidiskollur 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eidiskollur 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:43, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saksun 2019 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 15:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oyrarbakki 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:46, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tjornuvik from Eidiskollur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality, but the geolocation would be great. --Tournasol7 06:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 08:27, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sørvágsvatn 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohlerBremen 08:26, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Kallerna/2015-2019,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lopin kairasydänarkisto 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:40, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 04:32, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passo Cibiana 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 04:32, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Antelao 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 10:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Antelao 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Antelao 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 12:56, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passo Cibiana 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passo Cibiana 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:20, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:04, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:56, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:07, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:17, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:42, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 05:28, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:57, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ercé 06:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sørvágsvatn 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. The view is amazing actually --Podzemnik 03:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passo Cibiana 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 03:04, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Messner Mountain Museum Dolomites.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago di Sorapis 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago di Sorapis 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago10 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadini di Misurina panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cima di Terrarossa view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:27, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rifugio Lavaredo panorama edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:26, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:25, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tre Cime cows 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 11:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valle di Cadore 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 13:15, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tre Cime cows 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 11:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago di Lavaredo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 11:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 13.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 13.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Cristallo Lago di Sorapis hike.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:39, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monte Antelao 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality --Domob 12:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modeon del Montasio 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:37, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tre Cime cows 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:38, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Modeon del Montasio 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Rifugio Locatelli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punta dei Tre Scarperi panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Nice --Podzemnik 05:29, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tri Cime panorama 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:59, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tri Cime panorama 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lago di Sorapis 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 12:01, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpine ibex Cima di Terrarossa 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:06, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpine ibex Cima di Terrarossa 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpine ibex Cima di Terrarossa 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:05, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parco Naturale Tre Cime horses 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:18, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments6 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punta dei Tre Scarperi 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:45, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Punta dei Tre Scarperi 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parco naturale Tre Cime 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:54, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadini di Misurina Lavaredo 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:54, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:54, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Axel Tschentscher 15:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parco Naturale Tre Cime horses 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Lighten the shadows just a little and see if you like it even better. --GRDN711 01:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadini di Misurina Lavaredo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:01, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parco naturale Tre Cime 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rifugio Lavaredo panorama crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 08:49, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cibiana di Cadore 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 10:27, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulders Beach 2019 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulders Beach 2019 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:41, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapmans Peak Drive 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 08:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isla Incahuasi Uyuni 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:27, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atlantic Airways AgustaWestland AW139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:09, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpine ibex Cima di Terrarossa 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Not bad! --Moroder 08:45, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago13 comments6 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baboon @ Steenbras River Gorge 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:06, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View from the Rocks Cape Town 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:05, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter Island 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:06, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sol de Mañana 2018 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolivia 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 16:06, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Get tag would be very useful --Podzemnik 04:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Added. --Kallerna 18:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Support Perfecto --Podzemnik 04:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadini di Misurina Lavaredo 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Get tag would be useful --Podzemnik 04:22, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Support Good quality. Geotag not mandatory. --Axel Tschentscher 05:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
Added. --Kallerna 18:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Support Yeah it is not mandatory but I think users should be encouraged to add it. I'd love QI to set up good examples for others, especially new users --Podzemnik 04:36, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karim Z. Yskowicz & Tarja Halonen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:59, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cima di Terrarossa hike 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments6 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cima di Terrarossa hike 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec path 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 07:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kościelec view 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --EV Raudtee 16:07, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpine ibex Cima di Terrarossa 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lama glama Laguna Colorada 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:15, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ /−

Affected:

File:Dubai Marina The Beach.jpg

And also:

File:Dubai Marina The Observatory.jpg

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:11, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mangart 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Parco Naturale Tre Cime horses 3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parco Naturale Tre Cime horses 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Jukka Ketomäki 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rally Finland 2010 - EK 1 - Sebastien Ogier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not bad. But a longer exposure time would have given the picture more dynamic. -- Spurzem 14:03, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Nicholai Georgiu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support a lot of nothing in the image, but good quality --Carschten 20:24, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uncia uncia Ähtäri 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rally Finland 2010 - shakedown - Henning Solberg 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 10:27, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago9 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section microscopy Siilinjärvi R616 1820 apatite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section microscopy Siilinjärvi H10 phlogopite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-105.90.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:10, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-120.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-131.20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 00:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ähtärin karhut 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
looks overall too greenish to me, doesn't it? --Carschten 00:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
White balance adjusted. --Kallerna 05:37, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Support Thanks, much better! The crop at the top could be better, but good enough for QI to me. --Carschten 22:50, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R301-61.70.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really nice. -- Ikan Kekek 09:31, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-116.75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great composition, possible FP. -- Ikan Kekek 09:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-42.60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, interesting. -- Ikan Kekek 09:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R625-110.80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Less colorful than .75.jpg but also a possible FP, in terms of composition (whether anyone will object to a lack of pinpoint focus anywhere, I don't know). -- Ikan Kekek 09:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi 501-M3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi H2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi H10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Best composition of this group, a possible FP like some of the photos you submitted the other day - you might want to select whichever one you like best and nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R625-122.05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi H16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:27, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uncia uncia Ähtäri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Sharp on the head. --Axel Tschentscher 12:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-136.45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sample Siilinjärvi R625 (110.80).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section microscopy Siilinjärvi R216 10840 carbonate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 22:03, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-63.35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek 04:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section microscopy Siilinjärvi 501M3 etched.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 07:34, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R625-153.25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:00, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Kaknästornet 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-105.90 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-105.90.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-105.90 edit.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thin section scan crossed polarizers Siilinjärvi R636-105.90.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sample Siilinjärvi R636 (131.20).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 12:01, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sample Siilinjärvi R301 (61.70).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 13:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulders Beach 2019 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Milan Bališin 19:22, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Faloria Cortina d'Ampezzo 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Roy17 21:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalymnos sponges 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tomer T 15:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalymnos sponges 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tomer T 15:00, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sample Siilinjärvi H2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:33, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cadini di Misurina Lavaredo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:25, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auschwitz shoes 2019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 21:53, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sol de Mañana 2018 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:47, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment - Very good. Possibly a dust spot because there's one even darker spot in the darker red area. I trust your judgment on whether it is or not. -- Ikan Kekek 09:10, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Definitely a dust spot. I'll fix it. --Kallerna 13:46, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sol de Mañana 2018 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter Island 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. -- Ikan Kekek 11:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Easter Island 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 11:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Latest comment: 5 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tvøroyri from Smyril 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice and interesting, espec. with the rock formations! Quality deteriorates a little bit at left/right border, but IMHO OK. But I would suggest a bit of perspective correction: the buildings are leaning in (esp. at the left). --Aristeas 14:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't know how to do that. --Kallerna 09:12, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
@Kallerna: No problem, I can do it for you. Have you got a RAW (*.ARW) file for this photo, or the *.JPG only? I would prefer to edit the *.ARW file, if possible. --Aristeas 13:21, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks! I have uploaded the original photo without any modifications, see the file. --Kallerna 13:35, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you! I will look into it today … --Aristeas 08:31, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry, I was delayed, but will do this soon. --Aristeas 11:14, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Sorry for the long delay! While editing the file, I learned that perspective correction is not as simple (and also not as necessary) here as I thought first. When I wrote my review, I took some street lamp posts for orientation, but now I saw some of them are leaning ;-). You did quite a good job with your original image improvements (as present in the 1st upload). Nevertheless, because I was already at work, I finished my version. Please take a look at it. If you like it, we can keep it. Else, just reset to your first (edited) upload, and I would promote that version, because the perspective issues (which I mentioned above) are really minor. Best regards, --Aristeas 20:52, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, your version is ok. --Kallerna 05:44, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Support OK; at least the perspective should now be fine (all verticals vertical). --Aristeas 07:50, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 December 2019 (UTC)