Jewido

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jewido!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Rone Sjöhistorisk museet Fo217681.jpg

File:Rone Sjöhistorisk museet Fo217681.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

De728631 (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kurt Sjöhistoriska museet Fo171321AB.jpg

Copyright status: File:Kurt Sjöhistoriska museet Fo171321AB.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Kurt Sjöhistoriska museet Fo171321AB.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Lori Dreyer Sjöhistoriska museet Fo170989AB.jpg
• File:Lori Dreyer Sjöhistoriska museet Fo170989AB 2.jpg

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:08, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Template:IMO

Moin Jewido, wenn in einer IMO-Kategorie diese Vorlage verwendet wird, dann ist die Kategorie automatisch in der Category:Ships by IMO number gelistet, es bedarf keiner zusätzlichen Kategorisierung (siehe z. B. Category:IMO 9320049). Beste Grüße --Ein Dahmer (talk) 12:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Moin Ein Dahmer, besten Dank für den Tipp! Das spart etwas Arbeit und Zeit. Viele Grüße --Jewido (talk) 12:20, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Kategorie-Zuordnung

Hallo Jewido, wenn Du hier bei vielen Schiffsfotos die Kategorie "Built at (Werft XY)" hinzufügst, ist das schön! Aber warum verschiebst Du am laufenden Band die Zuordnung "Category:Ships built in JJJJ" von der Kategorie "Schiffname"-Seite zu der Kategorie "ENI"-Seite? Wo ist diese Zuordnung vereinbart??? Grüße--Rennboot (talk) 10:21, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Moin Rennboot, ich mische mich da mal ein. Wir sind uns doch darüber einig, dass ein Schiff nur einmal gebaut werden kann. Demzufolge müssen Bauwerft und Baujahr in eine gemeinsame Kategorie. Da Schiffe oft den Namen wechseln, ihre Schiffsnummer aber behalten, ist es sinnvoll, nur die IMO/ENI-Kategorie entsprechend zu kategorisieren. Leider hat man zu Beginn der Kategorisierung nicht so sehr darauf geachtet und aus diesem Grund existieren viele Überkategorisierungen. Ein kleiner Kreis von Benutzern räumt da jetzt auf, und Jewido gehört dankenswerterweise dazu. Gruß von der Küste --Ein Dahmer (talk) 13:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Moin Rennboot, unser netter Kollege Ein Dahmer hat die Gründe für mein Vorgehen bereits treffend genannt. Die Verschiebung der Kategorien Baujahr und Bauwerft in die jeweils übergeordnete ENI-Kategorie oder IMO-Kategorie des Schiffs verhindert Doppel- und Mehrfachkategorierungen. Wenn das Schiff unbenannt wird/wurde, ändert sich zwar der Schiffsname, nicht aber die ENI-Nummer oder IMO-Nummer, ebenso wenig die Bauwerft oder das Baujahr. Ein Beispiel: Das Schiff mit der ENI 07001502 fuhr bislang unter den Namen Piz Lunghin (ship, 1987) und Fortuna (ship, 1987). Es macht wenig Sinn, die Kategorie "Ships built in 1987" in alle drei Kategorien zu setzen und damit dasselbe Schiff dreimal in der Unterkategorie (built in 1987) erscheinen zu lassen. Viele Grüße von der Nordseeküste --Jewido (talk) 18:09, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Ships built at Schulte & Müller Schiffswerft, Haren (Ems)

Moin, das habe ich durch Anlegen der richtigen Kategorie (Category:Schulte & Müller Schiffswerft, Haren (Ems)) korrigiert. Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 14:06, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:IMO 9194309

Moin, wie kommst du darauf, dass, wie von dir kategorisiert, dieses Schiff bei der Schlömer Werft in Oldersum gebaut wurde? Erstens spricht die gleichzeitige Category:Ships built in Romania dagegen. Zweitens war die Schlömer Werft Ende 1996 von Oldersum nach Leer umgezogen. Das 1999 gebaute Schiff wäre demnach in Leer und nicht in Oldersum gebaut worden, wenn es denn überhaupt von der Schlömer Werft gebaut wurde. Kannst du das bitte nochmal überprüfenn? Gruß, -- Ies (talk) 10:56, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Moin Ies, das Schiff ist die ehemalige Moseldiep, die als Schlömer-Baunummer 603 entstanden ist. Der Kasko wurde aus Rumänien von der Werft Severnav (dortige Baunummer 610007) zugeliefert, die Endfertigung und Ausrüstung des Schiffs erfolgte bei Schlömer. Bezüglich des Standortes hast du natürlich recht, 1999 war die Schlömer-Werft nicht mehr in Oldersum sondern in Leer ansässig. Viele Grüße --Jewido (talk) 17:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Moving cats to IMO

How is deleting cats attached to specific ships, and attaching them to the ship's IMO cat remotely helpful. See here. You are unwittingly hiding search criteria from finding the ship itself. IMO 6807527 is not helpful to human beings whereas Caribia (ship, 1933) is. People search for the ship not the IMO number. Your making the IMO number superior to the ship name, when that's not how people think.. Transferring cats to Wikidata, is another way of impeding search.

We are in danger of catting as a means to itself, rather than catting in order to facilitate or improve search. Cats moved over to Wikidata or in this case IMO numbers have impeded search not helped it. Broichmore (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Deleting my cat

Why did you delete my cat of 13 March 2020? Broichmore (talk) 14:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Moin Broichmore, the photo shows the two ships "Mozart" and "Penag". The "Parma" is not visible in this photo - not even a small part of this ship. Ship categories are object categories. If a category is added, then the object should also be visible in the photo. It may be that this photo was taken by someone on board the "Parma", but unfortunately the "Parma" (object) itself is not visible. If you disagree, then add the category again. Regards --Jewido (talk) 19:09, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

So your saying the photo is not a part of the story of the Parma?

That the creators intent when he named the image is of no consequence?

That Category:Panoramic views from the Tour Montparnasse is an invalid category because no part of the Tour Montparnasse is in sight of the photos? Broichmore (talk) 19:27, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Wie oben bereits gesagt: Wenn du anderer Meinung bist, dann ergänze die Kategorie doch einfach wieder. Und natürlich ist die Category:Panoramic views from the Tour Montparnasse keine ungültige Kategorie. Der Name dieser Kategorie macht doch deutlich, dass hier allein um den Ausblick vom Tour Montparnasse geht. Viele Grüße --Jewido (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Normally when I see a marginal cat like that, I leave it alone. Someone made a judgement call. I only delete unquestionably wrong cats. Of course having gone to the trouble in the first place of putting it there, I will go back and put it in again. Cheers! Broichmore (talk) 11:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Schiffsklassen

Moin Jewido, vielen Dank für deine ganzen Beiträge und vor allem Beseitigungen von Überkatekorisierungen. Bezüglich der Kategorien Ships built at ... verstehe ich die Kategorie so, dass einzelne Schiffe und nicht Schiffsklassen dort kategorisiert sein sollten. Leider gibt es da einen Wildwuchs und ich denke, dass wir diesen nicht unterstützen sollten, oder? Noch eine schöne Adventszeit wünscht dir --Ein Dahmer (talk) 20:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Moin Ein Dahmer, ich hätte kein Problem damit, bei den Schiffsklassen wie oben genannt vorzugehen. Insbesondere, wenn die Schiffsklasse auf verschiedenen Werften gebaut oder die Kaskos von mehreren Werft zugeliefert wurden, gibt es ein ziemliches Kuddel-Muddel bei den Kategorien. Bei den Kategorien der Sietas-Typen bin ich damals ähnlich vorgegangen, weil die Typen 81, 95 usw. nicht nur in Neuenfelde sowie auch auf der Norderwerft gebaut worden sind. Viele Grüße vom NOK und ebenfalls besten Dank für deine fleißige Mitarbeit hier auf Commons. --Jewido (talk) 18:46, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Moin Jewido, komme heute aus meiner Wikipause zurück und lese deinen Dank für die fleißige Mitarbeit: Den gebe ich 1:1 zurück! Ich wünsche dir einen guten Start in das Neue Jahr und bleib gesund, damit wir hier weiter gemeinsam „rocken“ können. --Ein Dahmer (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Help:Gadget-HotCat

Moin Jewido, kennst du eigentlich dieses Werkzeug? Deine Änderungen werden damit im Detail angezeigt und andere Benutzer müssen danach nicht mehr unbedingt die Versionsgeschichte aufrufen. Beste Grüße --Ein Dahmer (talk) 20:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:La Paloma 3 2023-04-16 JDohrn.jpg

Copyright status: File:La Paloma 3 2023-04-16 JDohrn.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:La Paloma 3 2023-04-16 JDohrn.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Category:Lady M class ships

Is this intended to be anything more than a disambiguation? - Jmabel ! talk 00:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)