Jarry1250
Tip: Categorizing images
edit
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:CRGS circa 1920.jpg is uncategorized since 1 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:CRGS pre1908.jpg is uncategorized since 1 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:CRGS 1905.jpg is uncategorized since 1 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- Image:AWB-Fronds.png is uncategorized since 9 June 2009.
- Image:RFA average bytes with numbers.png is uncategorized since 23 June 2009.
- Image:Polo's journey.svg is uncategorized since 9 July 2009.
- Image:Ventnor sea defences.png was uncategorized on 15 August 2009.
- Image:Espirito Santo Bank.jpg was uncategorized on 28 September 2009.
- Image:The Signpost Tech Report visitor numbers.png was uncategorized on 1 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- Image:The Signpost combined viewer numbers (reduced).png was uncategorized on 1 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:22, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
User:WikiProjectSpain
editDon't worry: I'm on it: COM:AN#WikiProjectSpain_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29 - Just want to discuss it a little bit first. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:01, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
editYour image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Falaise Pocket map.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Screenshot licensing
editHi, I've updated the screenshot license, to only keep the GPL license. The action of take this screenshot doesn't seem to be copyright eligible, as it's a trivial work, and furthermore, you can't relicense the screenshot content just taking it. --Dereckson (talk) 00:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification. --Dereckson (talk) 00:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
TUSC token 2afa4f7d56723f6ecffefe9fa2d41f07
editI am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Files you uploaded may be deleted
editThe files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 02:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Geocoding tool
editWould it be possible to modify your geocoding tool to take a username and "all images newer than" date rather than a category? --Carnildo (talk) 21:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the tool (and as a programmer, I certainly don't mind dates in the 20100105 format), but I'm experiencing three problems:
- If I specify "Carnildo" as the username and "20090101" (or any other date), the page times out while loading.
- If I specify "Carnildo" as the username, and don't specify a date, the page loads quickly, but gives images uploaded by User:Conversion script, starting with File:Blick über Funchal.jpg.
- For the image File:Blick über Funchal.jpg, the image isn't displayed on the page, and the page source contains <img src="" /> where the image should be.
- --Carnildo (talk) 21:31, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Geocoding tool (2)
editHello,
I just discovered your tool: it sure can be very handy. Some issues I came across :
- I checked for names with accents, spaces... It breaks with Category:Église de la Trinité d'Angers (my guess is « ' ») and Category:Monuments historiques in Rennes (no guess). I'm trying with more, but it seems broken right now (I will try again later)
- If it finds nothing (user mistyped the category or tool fails, as above), there is no box to prompt for a new search. An error message along the lines of « Sorry, category does not exist » would be nice too.
I hope this helps :-) Jean-Fred (talk) 20:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
OTRS (obviously)
editHey Stifle, your en userpage says you're busy in RL, so no rush. What was the difference between File:Jean-Paul Rodrigue.jpg and File:Stages of a bubble.png? Is there anything I can do? Jarry1250 (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
- The permission is from Mr. Rodrigue himself, which is fine for the second image, but we need the actual photographer's permission for the first image. Stifle (talk) 16:14, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Autopatrol
editHello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no affect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. –Juliancolton | Talk 21:29, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Re: File:Grandes_armes_du_Royaume_de_Naples2.svg
editSome of them, yes. Some gradients and color on the Order hanging from the shield were broken. But I also added one black field in top right corner of the shield and some fish scales on mermaids' tails. Best reagrds and thanks for your support:) Avalokitesvara (talk) 15:36, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
|
File:Ford Comuta electric car.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
SVGTranslate
editHi Jarry. You might be interested in the request on Template talk:Translation possible#Inactivity of Nikola: SVG translate needs of a new programmer please !. --Leyo 19:46, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Jarry,
- Thanks for your help to secure this code by hosting it.
- If you do so please update the associate template's link toward the new location.
- Find a programmer is secondary, just, if you find someone suitable, notice him this need. ;) Yug (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
- @Jarry1250, Leyo, and Yug: : I would like to take care about SVG-translate[1][2], and try to make it work again. — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 11:51, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
the extension is too complicated for me to be able to get to production-grade by myself.) The source code for svgtranslate is here. The main bug seems to be this one, which involves oAuth. Last time I looked it really wasn't obvious to me how to fix it though :( Maybe I'll take another look soon. Jarry1250 (talk) 13:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
Talkback
editHello, Jarry1250. You have new messages at Multichill's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
svgcheck
editHi Jarry, thanks for your very helpful svgcheck tool. I used the stable version on the oldest file version of File:Pravo-logo ca. 1995.svg and it showed no errors and displays it correctly. However, Commons did not. We guess it may be because the original uses CMYK (at least the author said it does). Can you include a check in your tool for this problem? Hope you have nice holidays! :) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:57, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hallo, I have lately found that CMYK is not the problem, but probably version of Adobe Illustrator, see File:PČR seal CMYK.svg. Regards, --Gumruch (talk) 10:08, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and apologies for the delay. I have now looked at the issue again, and pinpointed the error - the use of custom entity references in the Doctype specification. Which is a stupid idea all around.
- I shall add it to svgcheck shortly. Regards, Jarry1250 (talk) 12:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:22, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 22:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Bot approved. Have a nice day! --99of9 (talk) 02:24, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jarry1250 (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
File:Zeppelin bombing plaque 2005.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 00:04, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year voting round 1 open
editDear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:
- Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 0000 [UTC].
- This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
- Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.
To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year
Copyright status: File:Map of Hoare-Laval Pact.jpg
editThis media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Map of Hoare-Laval Pact.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
File:Adam Posen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
russavia (talk) 11:43, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.Dear Jarry1250, Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, |
Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!Dear Jarry1250, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, |
wmflabs' SVGcheck...
edit... cannot correctly render non Western fonts. At least yours on toolserver can. Just so you know. -- Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 04:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
editPicture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
editRound 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
edit- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Jarry1250⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
editPicture of the Year 2013 Results
edit- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Jarry1250,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Bot de-flagging notification
editHi Jarry1250, I'm writing to you because your bot File Upload Bot (Jarry1250) (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity for a period longer than two years. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 2#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a month from now (10 May 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 13:25, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Commons bot inactivity
editHello! Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 4 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can rerequest the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:36, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
Your VFC installation method is deprecated
editHello Jarry1250, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello.
The files File:Standard time zones of the world.png and File:DEC31 World Time Zones.png which were last uploaded on 19 September 2016 and 19 October 2017 respecitvely and have not been updated since, need to be updated to reflect the latest changes as of November 2017, because both Sudan and Namibia have changed their time zone to UTC 2 on 1 November and on 8 August 2017 respectively (and Namibia also abolished DST), and Northern Cyprus reverted back to UTC 2 (and uses DST again) on 29 October 2017.
Thank you.
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
editYou are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Jarry1250,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
editDear Jarry1250,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again!
editHi
You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.
You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.
Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Monopolistically competitive market diagrams has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Notification about possible deletion
editSome contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Genericusername57 (talk) 18:46, 22 October 2023 (UTC)