User talk:Jacek Halicki/Archive23

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Biała Lądecka, in Krosnowice.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krosnowice, train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 06:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krosnowice, former Bobo Cotton Industries.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 14:21, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, cmentarz komunalny, krzyż pokutny 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:46, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 6, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:07, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 7, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, and I find the quality good. -- Ikan Kekek 10:22, 13 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krosnowice, library.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:59, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Hipermarket E.Leclerc w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 08:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 9, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 7, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:22, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 7, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:56, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 7, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Okay, imo the P100 images are really just about QI --DXR 08:37, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 7, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 09:19, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 8, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 09:24, 14 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 10, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:07, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 10, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 13, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:15, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 13, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:17, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 13, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lądek Zdrój, Rynek 10, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The crop is tight on both sides... but good quality to me. --Cayambe 09:16, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mariańska.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Chełmońskiego 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:38, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Malczewskiego 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Dąbrówki 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:37, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, pomnik św. Franciszka z Asyżu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:13, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Jagiełły 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:21, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, pl. Jagiełły 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 1 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality; the perspectives seem correct, the buildings are not entirely straight. Some improvements can be made by cloning out the spots from birds in the sky. --Peulle 07:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 1 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 07:27, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 1 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 1 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 1 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:58, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Grottgera 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Interesting shot; those conditions on the right are caused by morning mist, is that correct? Judging from the left side, though, the image could use some denoising.--Peulle 07:54, 18 May 2017 (UTC)@Peulle:  Done --Jacek Halicki 10:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC) Support OK.--Peulle 13:02, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 1 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 1 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:11, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 2 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 08:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 2 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 2 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:32, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 2 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 2 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 3 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 11:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 3 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 3 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
1 Market Square in Wałbrzych, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Market Square in Wałbrzych, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:40, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:35, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
2 Market Square in Wałbrzych, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful and very good! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:48, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Wałbrzych, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
3 Market Square in Wałbrzych, heads of pilasters.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Very good, useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Zoppo59 (talk) 16:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 3 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 06:13, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 3 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 9 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 17 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 17 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --DXR 07:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 18 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 18 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 21 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:56, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 21 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:31, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wałbrzych, Rynek 22 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:58, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
17 Market Square in Wałbrzych, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
18 Market Square in Wałbrzych, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Market Square in Wałbrzych, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:19, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
21 Market Square in Wałbrzych, medaillons.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 06:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
22 Market Square in Wałbrzych,.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 06:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 21:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Market Square in Wałbrzych, facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 21:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
23 Market Square in Wałbrzych, anchor.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, Bożków Palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, franciscan monastery in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, basilica of the Visitation in Wambierzyce.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, church of the Assumption in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 12:58, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, katedra w Pizie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good. --Rbrechko 09:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, klasztor franciszkanów w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, kościół w Wambierzycach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, kościół Wniebowzięcia NMP w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, Most Zwierzyniecki we Wrocławiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, ratusz staromiejski w Pradze.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 10:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, ratusz w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 11:18, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, ratusz w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, ratusz w Kłodzku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, Zwierzyniecki Bridge in Wrocław.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, Old Town Hall in Prague.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, Town Hall in Wrocław.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, market square in Kłodzko.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, Statue of Liberty in New York.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support, useful and best in scope. DeFacto (talk). 06:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, ratusz we Wrocławiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, rynek w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, Statua Wolności w Nowym Yorku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check for copyright. Is it allowed to take such photographs in Poland? --XRay 10:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC) Done--Jacek Halicki 11:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, wiadukt w Lewinie Kłodzkim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check for copyright. Is it allowed to take such photographs in Poland? --XRay 10:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, wieża ciśnień we Wrocławiu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But please check for copyright. Is it allowed to take such photographs in Poland? --XRay 10:00, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Minieuroland w Kłodzku, Łuk Triumfalny w Paryżu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Targi Staroci w Kłodzku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Targi Staroci w Kłodzku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Targi Staroci w Kłodzku 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Targi Staroci w Kłodzku 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 08:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, muzeum, targi staroci 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Do they sell old analog manual focus lenses there? Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC) There they sell everything --Jacek Halicki 21:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Jasna, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:01, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Państwowa Szkoła Muzyczna w Kłodzku 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 07:48, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Krakusa 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Kusocińskiego 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:49, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 08:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Mickiewicza, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 07:48, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Sośnina, Wzgórza Rogówki, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:35, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom Skowronki w Radochowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Izba regionalna w Radochowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:07, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 7.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2016 Pałac w Wojanowie 7.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Izba regionalna w Radochowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawny przystanek kolejowy w Trzebieszowicach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:19, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Romanowo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Sosenka, Góry Złote, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Piotrówka, Krowiarki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 32 w Romanowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 06:39, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 32 w Romanowie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:47, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Słupiec, Krowiarki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:30, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Grodowa, Krowiarki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Biała Lądecka w Ołdrzychowicach Kłodzkich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very bright, but not quite too bright in my opinion. Good quality IMO and a nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Sędzisz, Krowiarki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:00, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dwór w Konradowie 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:24, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom Romanowo 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Thanks --Moroder 22:12, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 26 w Zabłociu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kapliczka w Zabłociu 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kapliczka w Zabłociu 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Linia kolejowa nr 322 w Zabłociu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 06:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Remiza OSP w Zabłociu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:00, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Czarna Góra, Masyw Śnieżnika, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Surowiec drzewny w Romanowie.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Biblioteka w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:32, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Kolejowa 185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:12, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Kolejowa 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Nysa Kłodzka w Zabłociu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I'd like to recommend to clone away the dustspot-like (?) bird in the sky at left. --Cayambe 12:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kościół Katarzyny Aleksandryjskiej w Kątach Bystrzyckich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Manfred Kuzel 08:30, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 14 w Kątach Bystrzyckich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Tournasol7 12:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 22 w Kątach Bystrzyckich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 23 w Kątach Bystrzyckich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:54, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Bystrzyca Kłodzka, ul. Kolejowa 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 09:10, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawne Bystrzyckie Zakłady Przemysłu Zapałczanego 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dawne Bystrzyckie Zakłady Przemysłu Zapałczanego 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Domy w Bystrzycy-Kolonii.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Komisariat policji w Bystrzycy Kłodzkiej.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Stacja kolejowa Bystrzyca Kłodzka Przedmieście 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 19 w Mielniku 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 19 w Mielniku 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 20 w Mielniku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Przełęcz Mielnicka, Krowiarki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 08:22, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, overpass in Lewin Kłodzki.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:23, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, water tower in Wrocław.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Minieuroland in Kłodzko, Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:24, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wayside chapel in Marcinów, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wzgórza Rogówki, Sośnina, exposure from NW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dom nr 24 w Kątach Bystrzyckich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wyższa Szkoła Zarządzania, Wydział Turystyki w Kłodzku.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:03, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Droga krajowa nr 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kamieniołom w Krowiarkach, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Krosnowice, dawne Zakłady Przemysłu Bawełnianego Bobo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:27, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapniarka, Krowiarki, Sudety 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:00, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapniarka, Krowiarki, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:32, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Sośnina, Wzgórza Rogówki, Sudety 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 08:44, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dębowa, Krowiarki, Sudety.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.  Question Is it a crop? Your camera offers 6000x4000. --Milseburg 10:04, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Trzebieszowice, train station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Konradów, exposure from W.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manor in Konradów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kąty Bystrzyckie, Alchemical forge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:08, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Grodowa, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --  — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Radochów, regional chamber.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:29, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:24, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanowo mine, exposure from E.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:30, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanowo mine, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Hi Jacek, why do you think this image is the most valued image in this category, because there are some more images taken by yourself with a wider range of view from south on this mine.--Zoppo59 (talk) 14:24, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

  This is the only one photo showing the dust floating over the whole plant.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:17, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

  Yes sure, but maybe it would be better to describe the scope more specific, because the view on the plant is very close in difference to this, e.g. something like "view to the entrance" or "Plant during production and dust immission". But Please know, that I am often in trouble while building the correct scope for my own images, so I feel not sure. Perhaps this should be judged by an more experienced user. --Zoppo59 (talk) 06:30, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

  In my opinion, this scope is OK. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support --Zoppo59 (talk) 19:44, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanowo mine, exposure from SW.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:49, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:25, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Kamiennik, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:50, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 5, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 5, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 5, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 7, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Zakład wapienniczy Dolmin w Żelaźnie 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:47, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James church cemetery in Krosnowice, gravestone of Ignaz Reimann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 21:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Saint James church cemetery in Krosnowice, gravestone of Caroline Reimann.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 21:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Romanowska Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Żeleźniak, exposure from NE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:16, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 9, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 9, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 9, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 09:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 11, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kłodzko, Matejki 11, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:36, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Radochowie 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:53, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Morcinka 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Morcinka 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality although quite small. Is this a crop? --Code 08:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, pomnik poległych żołnierzy Armii Czerwonej.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality although I'd prefer a little bit more contrast. --Code 08:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Llez (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
11 Matejki Street in Kłodzko, keystone in portal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Okrzei Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, entrance to the library.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

• A little geocoding, can be ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
  

   Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:21, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:09, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:26, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kolejowa Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, house number 30.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

A little geocoding, can be there too ... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

 Done --Jacek Halicki (talk) 08:25, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sienkiewicza Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, former Bystrzyckie Plants of the Match Industry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul.Ostatnia.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 20:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Piastowska, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of St. Nicholas in Radochów, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment - File:2015 Kościół św. Mikołaja w Radochowie 01.jpg is in the same scope, except that it's a winter view. Should the scope for this photo be specified as a spring view? And then the next question is whether views of this church in at least the distinguishable seasons (spring/summer, fall and winter) could all be valuable. Maybe, but what do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

  In my opinion, in these cases, there are two scopes: winter and non-winter, without different seasons.--Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - OK with me. Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:22, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Połabska 5, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Połabska 5, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:25, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Ptasia, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Ptasia, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 11:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Cees-Pol, 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:05, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Okrzei 20 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not bad but shouldn't there be a category for the type of subject?--Peulle 11:01, 20 June 2017 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 21:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC) OK now. --Peulle 20:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Romanowo, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Piotrówka stream.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Question No votes, comments or annotation? --Jacek Halicki (talk) 07:31, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - OK, I'm not sure every little stream is notable enough for a VI, but I guess if this one merits a Wikipedia article, it's useful as the seemingly sole photo of this stream on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:54, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mielnik, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, house number 19.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Dębowa, exposure from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
John of Nepomuk statue in Żelazno.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, quarry.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zabłocie (powiat kłodzki), chapel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support - Useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:57, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dysk SSD Plextor M8Pe(Y) 256GB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PetarM 07:14, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Dysk SSD ADATA SX900 128GB.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Połabska 5, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:41, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Ptasia, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:27, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Nikon Coolpix P520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PetarM 07:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Słowackiego Street in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, police station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Railway line 322 (Poland), in Zabłocie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nysa Kłodzka, in Zabłocie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Krowiarki, Mielnicka Pass.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:33, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, houses in Bystrzyca-Kolonia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Ptasia, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:39, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Półwiejska, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:05, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Półwiejska, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 10:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, Cees-Pol, 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Reja, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The shadow is a bit disturbing, but QI anyway --Cayambe 11:07, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Wapniarka, Krowiarki, Sudety 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.  Question I want to ask again if it is a crop, since your camera offers a higher resolution. --Milseburg 13:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC) @Milseburg: Yes, it's crop. --Jacek Halicki 21:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC)} I think the original size wouldn´t be worse.--Milseburg 11:53, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, fire station, exposure from SE.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Bystrzyca Kłodzka, fire station, exposure from N.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 19:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nikon Coolpix P520.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plextor, M8Pe(Y) solid-state drive.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
ADATA Technology, SX900 solid-state drive.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:05, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Reymonta, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Spadzista 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Spadzista 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:05, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Spadzista 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 12:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Spółdzielcza, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Tetmajera 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, kamień Napoleona 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, budynek straży pożarnej 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please add a English description.--ArildV 08:47, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Walecznych, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Wodna 1 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 12:28, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Św. Wojciecha 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Tournasol7 12:31, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Zakład General Electric w Kłodzku.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Zamiejska, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:23, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Kłodzko, ul. Zawiszy Czarnego, gimnazjum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There are two dust spots (birds?) above the lamp on the right side --Llez 09:54, 26 June 2017 (UTC) Done --Jacek Halicki 09:59, 26 June 2017 (UTC)  Support OK now --Llez 10:26, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Odbiornik radiowy Światowid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:50, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Śląska, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:02, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing and extraordinary bridge! Unique! Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:52, 28 June 2017 (UTC) Agree! I would support this at FPC. --W.carter 15:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój, most św. Jana 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Most św. Jana w Lądku-Zdroju 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Orłowcu 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Radochowie 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:55, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 07:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:49, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:59, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 08:22, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kłodzko, ul. Spółdzielcza, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK. --C messier 13:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Lądek-Zdrój ul. Spacerowa 10 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Bartłomieja w Skrzynce, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:09, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Dwór w Trzebieszowicach, mur oporowy 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:08, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:10, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Dzwonnica w Dańczowie, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:07, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Kaplica w Jerzykowicach Małych 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Contrast could be improved. --XRay 09:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Domaszków, ul. Międzyleska 18 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. IMO the main subject is the tree. --XRay 09:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Rynek w Międzylesiu, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 12, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:50, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. The cars are disturbing. Minor CAs at the antennas. --XRay 09:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:18, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:21, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 13, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:20, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 14, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:54, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 14, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 14, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. PumpkinSky 10:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)  Comment But please add "windows" or something to the descriptions. :) --Peulle 11:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 15, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 16, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 16, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:44, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Międzylesiu, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:01, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2017 Kaplica domkowa w Marcinowie 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition and good quality -- Spurzem 07:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Międzylesiu, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Międzylesiu, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Międzylesiu, 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:06, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Międzylesie, pl. Wolności 14, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:04, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Młynów i Ławica.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zameczek w Opolnicy 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Międzylesiu, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Międzylesiu, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:44, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Barbary w Międzylesiu, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:19, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Sukiennice w Międzylesiu, 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, kościół śś. Piotra i Pawła 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:30, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:01, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, park przy pałacu 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:24, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 15.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:10, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:18, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 11:19, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2016 Zameczek w Opolnicy 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the criss-cross created by the tree branches and the castle pretty visible inspite of that. Offers a different perspective from the other images of the place we have on Commons. --Rahul Bott 09:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 19.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 16.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 20.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 22.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

File:Tran Anh Phuong.jpg

File:Tran Anh Phuong.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

El Grafo (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:50, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:27, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 08:45, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:36, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:46, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very sharp photo, good perspective but main object is completely shadowed. However quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:34, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:13, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 44.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 45.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pałac 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pomnik Heinricha Bendera 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:35, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Bożkowie 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Bożkowie 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Bożkowie 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 08:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pomnik Heinricha Bendera 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Bożków, pomnik Heinricha Bendera 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 09:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Czerwieńczyce, kościół św. Bartłomieja 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2015 Leśniczówka w Bożkowie 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 10:22, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:38, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:49, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2014 Kościół św. Marcina w Dzikowcu, 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 12:34, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2017 (UTC)