User talk:George Chernilevsky/Archive/Archive 2015 2

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive M62-1342 2014 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cichlidae fish 2008 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 23:01, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive VL80K-736 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:37, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive ChME3-4229 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive M62-1342 2014 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:19, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ZiL-130 truck 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 22:32, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraneetroplus synspilus 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astronotus ocellatus 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:59, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paraneetroplus synspilus (redhead cichlid, quetzel cichlid, firehead cichlid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Hi George, you forgot the geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

• A studio shot, geocode not needed -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:18, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cichlasoma trimaculatum (Trimac cichlid).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Hi George, you forgot the geocoding --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

• A studio shot, geocode not needed -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:22, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astronotus ocellatus 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astronotus ocellatus 2015 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:36, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Locomotive VL80K-549 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 16:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paraneetroplus synspilus 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eriphia verrucosa (warty crab, yellow crab), frontal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 23:17, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eriphia verrucosa (warty crab, yellow crab), dorsal view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eriphia verrucosa (warty crab, yellow crab), male ventral view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
 Oppose I do not think a live animal should be deliberately turned on its back to be photographed. Should not be VI. --Charles (talk) 06:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

• Alive and turned by me for this photo. You can see other photos in category --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: This image is very didactic. This moral judgment can not be a criterion of judgment for a Vote in VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:17, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

•  Support Good. Yann (talk) 20:16, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment A didactic image would be taken of a dead specimen. I realize we can all have different opinions on cruelty to animals. --Charles (talk) 22:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
    • It is rather a cruelty in relation to the photographer . This crab wounded my hands with claws to bleeds during a photo-session. A few seconds later after this photo this crab was turned over to a natural pose. An old Eriphia verrucosa is able to crush bones in fingers of a human. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:26, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Do I understand you correctly, Charlesjsharp, it would have been more humane to kill the crab before taking the picture??? --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:24, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment You certainly do not understand me correctly. --Charles (talk) 15:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:49, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment I want to say that I assume the good faith of George Chernilevsky when he says he has not hurt the animal and that he was unhurt, though I have even much more respect for animals that for many of my fellow humans, thus I appreciate the concern of Charlesjsharp, and animals and plants must be handled as little as possible, or else with more care and respect as possible. -- Christian Ferrer 11:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
• I have a proof that this crab remained alive . Just compare Eriphia_verrucosa_male_2009_G2.jpg and Eriphia_verrucosa_male_2009_G5.jpg EXIF timestamp. A dead crab typically has own eyes which fell down. Here Eriphia_verrucosa_male_2009_G5.jpg eyes are directed up, this is alive animal. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
• Thank you for pictures, proof and to have this animal treated with the respect it deserves, 3 minutes after he looks healthy indeed. Cute crab and gentleman George. :) -- Christian Ferrer 17:24, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syringa vulgaris 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:49, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilac bouquet 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

MVR in VI

Hello! Could you do something with broken section of VI - Most Valued Reviews? This part of VI is not working for a long time. I wrote some time ago a message to User Dschwan but he didn't reply. 8 images waiting for promotion and now I added another MVR. We should do something with that... I wrote about this issue to other administrator (Poco a poco) but without result. Mayby you can help? Halavar (talk) 14:58, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello, my friend!

Probably fixed.

With best regards, George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:59, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Yes, looks good. Finally VICbot started to move there. Thank you very much! --Halavar (talk) 08:28, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint John the Evangelist in Vinnytsya, view from West.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Llez (talk) 20:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:00, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Christian Ferrer 17:45, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii bud 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod pond 2013 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Code 08:33, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod pond 2013 G7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 04:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod pond 2013 G6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Excellent masking job ! (I'm kidding) Seriously: very impressive, lovely view and excellent achievement.--Jebulon 17:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod pond 2013 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod pond 2013 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:51, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod pond 2013 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod pond 2013 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paeonia rockii (Rock's tree peony), unripe fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Paeonia rockii (Rock's tree peony), bud.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ 20:33, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:06, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:57, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:59, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paeonia rockii bud 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hieracium pilosella 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lupinus polyphyllus UA 2015 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:00, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Brazil ♥ Ukraine

♥ Two countries. One love. ♥ 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Visit Brazil someday!

Hello, George Chernilevsky! I recommend you visit Brazil. This vast country is home to unique natural life. It is abundant in splendid landscapes. Visit Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Brasília and many other cities! Visit Brazil someday! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:30, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks, my friend! --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:02, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

With a stop in Paris first, of course 🇫🇷👋🏻--Jebulon (talk) 22:12, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

Of course -- 17:32, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Komargorod pond 2013 G3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Komargorod pond 2013 G3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komargorod Church 2013 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Church of the Intercession Otchenashevka 2013 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lacerta agilis argus, (Sand lizard ssp. argus), female.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:32, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Snowy road Sosonka 2013 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Snowy road Sosonka 2013 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cattle Komargorod 2013 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:25, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnolia liliiflora 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and exquisite light. Concerning all the common names it reminds me of the Danish saying "Kært barn har mange navne";) --Slaunger 19:37, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laetiporus sulphureus 2012 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laetiporus sulphureus 2012 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:43, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Rapana venosa

file:Rapana venosa MHNT.jpg Picture of the day on February 17, 2016. Is it you who chose the date? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:46, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

• Yes --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
  • Merci Georges You really are amazing! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
    • -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:20, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lacerta agilis female 2013 G1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lacerta agilis female 2013 G1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brassica oleracea 2011 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:49, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufo bufo 2015 G3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:56, 23 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufo bufo 2015 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bufo bufo 2015 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:34, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in bucket 2013 G1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good ...quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:36, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edible fungi in bucket 2013 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Xerocomellus chrysenteron, Edible fungi in basket 2013 G2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Resolution, depth of field, and exposure are fine. Fill-flash was used effectively to emphasize subject. --Wsiegmund 15:31, 25 June 2015 (UTC)