GayTenn

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GayTenn!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Native American Tribal Jurisdiction Same-Sex Marriage Map

I really like the map you created (Same-sex unions by US counties and cities.) Do you think it would be possibly to make a similar map for Native American Tribal Jurisdictions? That would be very helpful! Tribes would be broken up into three categories: Tribes that legalized same-sex marriage, Tribes that outlawed same-sex marriage, and tribes that have no law permitting nor prohibiting same-sex marriage. So uh, if you could make one that would be great and if not.. I understand.

Thank you, --Prcc27 (talk) 06:21, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Please rename image.

Could you please move US Attorney Generals Supporting SSM.svg to US Attorneys Generals Supporting SSM.svg. The proper plural of Attorney General is Attorneys General. Like Court Martial, the noun (which is first) is pluralized, not the adjective).Naraht (talk) 19:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Please

Revert Utah to U.S. baby blue and color Nicaragua beige (reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:World_homosexuality_laws.svg#Nicaragua_should_be_beige ). People are coloring Mozambique yellow again because they are reverting the whole of your edit rather than specifically removing Utah. Srtª PiriLimPomPom (talk) 01:59, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

US counties and cities with sexual orientation and gender identity protection.svg changes?

Greetings - I was curious if you could explain why you removed Union Township, Branch County, Michigan from the File:US counties and cities with sexual orientation and gender identity protection.svg map and what Michigan city in Cass County has an ordinance? You mentioned it was a border issue - are you implying that a part of South Bend, Indiana borders or is in Cass County? This file helps illustrate that it does not border or enter Cass County. --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 07:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for re-adding Branch County - but why keep Cass County? -Varnent (talk)^(COI) 03:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Please stop reverting

Again, please stop reverting without discussing first. That map was intentionally made (by me) to be made for counties and cities ONLY. The national map and the article itself covers that there are statewide protections (which are disputed anyway btw). This map is meant to cover local, not state, laws. You are welcome to create another map, but the legend and elsewhere clearly states these are cities and counties with coverage. What you are doing implies that public employees of any random county is covered - which is false. --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 15:46, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

The executive order is for public employees of the state government - and does not cover county or city employees - hence the reason to have county and cities mapped out separately. --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 15:50, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Seriously - what is the deal? --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 05:41, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Again - please stop making the Michigan map wrong. --Varnent (talk)^(COI) 05:54, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Michigan counties townships and cities with sexual orientation and gender identity protection.svg

File:Michigan counties townships and cities with sexual orientation and gender identity protection.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Varnent (talk)^(COI) 18:20, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Kentucky needs to be added as recognizing ssm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Same-sex_unions_by_US_counties_and_cities.svg --Prcc27 (talk) 05:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Same-sex unions by US counties and Cities

Wisconsin needs to be added as having ssm. For now. --Prcc27 (talk) 07:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Constitutional bans on same-sex unions types US.svg

File:Constitutional bans on same-sex unions types US.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Revent^talk 07:45, 23 August 2016 (UTC)