Gamaliel

File:David Wiley circa 1768- 1813.jpg

hi, nice upload. you might want to consider using commons:pattypan, which allows upload with artwork template. cheers. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:05, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Turcicorum tyrannorum Ioanni Campani (1597).jpg

Hi, please don't use {{Missing source}} if there is clearly not a copyright issue. Instead, you could add an information template if you wish and fill in {{unknown|source}} in the 'source' field. Jcb (talk) 21:50, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the suggestion. Gamaliel (talk) 22:17, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Ecgwynn.jpg

Regarding File:Ecgwynn.jpg, are you sure it depicts en:Ecgwynn and not en:Eadgifu of Kent? Archaeologia Cantiana, Vol. 36, 1923, The Picture of Queen Ediva in Canterbury Cathedral by C. Eveleigh Woodruff, M.A. (1855–1948) would suggest not. Greenshed (talk) 19:53, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

@Greenshed: I have no idea, I have zero knowledge of that era, I just relied on the museum's attribution: https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/portrait/mw123250/Ecgwynn-consort-to-King-Edward-the-Elder. If they're wrong, I do know that they are receptive to corrections using the comment box at the bottom of the page; about a year ago I sent them a correction to an attribution on a different image and they fixed it. Gamaliel (talk) 14:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Foxglove (Fingerhut) Albert Renger-Patzsch.jpg

File:Foxglove (Fingerhut) Albert Renger-Patzsch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mutter Erde (talk) 08:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

J. Merigot

Hi Gamaliel, could you please renamed this Commons category as "James Merigot" ? In fact this artist is Jacques-François II Mérigot, as spelled in french, but James will be fine. Thanks, --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

@Marc-AntoineV: Done! I've also merged the duplicate Wikidata items. Gamaliel (talk) 20:32, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Category:The_North_Face_Wikipedia_advertising_campaign

Category:The_North_Face_Wikipedia_advertising_campaign has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Fæ (talk) 10:16, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Lottie Wilson Jackson image

Hi Gamaliel, I uploaded a cleaned-up version of the image of Lottie Wilson Jackson. Both the photo you added and the revised one are in the commons under the category Lottie Wilson Jackson. I put the revised image in her profile. If you think the one with the caption is better, let me know and I will put it back. Best, WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:58, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

The new version looks great! Nice work. Gamaliel (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Looking for "Mormonism" alligator image (While the Watchman Sleeps

Hi Gamaliel, I saw your 1898 image you uploaded from artist Charles Nelan, with the "Mormonism" Aligator entering the US Congress, titled, "While the Watchman Sleeps." I've been trying to find the source for this, since it's for a project I'm working on. I see it's from the Ohio State archive, but I'm looking for what newspaper/date it's from. My guess is the New York Herald? Thanks greatly in advance if you are able to help me locate it. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kondorman (talk • contribs)

@Kondorman: Regarding File:Anti-Mormon_cartoon.jpeg I'm afraid I couldn't tell you. This is one of many cartoons in scrapbooks that people made over the years and then ended up in the collections of the Billy Ireland Cartoon Library & Museum. Most of the images lack context - who created them, what newspaper they are from, etc. The folks at Billy Ireland are really helpful and they might be able to give you more info about this particular scrapbook. Gamaliel (talk) 18:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Angelo da Clareno.jpg

With all due respect, I don't think that is a picture of Angelo da Clareno, but rather Agnellus of Pisa, for the following reasons:

• "B" apparently indicates "Blessed"; Angelo isn't, but Agnellus is;
• its source, the File:Certamen seraphicum provinciae angliae pro sancta dei ecclesia, refers to the "English Province"; all the others depicted appear to be members of the English Province of Franciscans, -which Agnellus founded, but Angelo was nowhere near;
• although the "g" and "n" are reversed (Agnellus is not a common name), the caption "Proto Min Anglie" suggests it refers to the First Minorite in England -which was Agnellus in 1224.
• I would not have noticed, except it appears that the chaplain's dept. at Notre Dame considers it Agnellus [1] ---I have amended the caption and categories, but not the File name, lest it somehow cause havoc. With all sincere wishes for a Happy New Year.. Manannan67 (talk) 05:15, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

@Manannan67: I don't know enough about the subject to know whether or not you are correct, but it certainly sounds convincing to me. The attribution is from the UK National Portrait Gallery [2]. They may be wrong, certainly, and when they are I know they are open to corrections because they corrected an attribution on another piece after I sent them a comment. If you scroll to the bottom of that page you can see the comment form. Gamaliel (talk) 15:42, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Just heard back from the National Portrait Gallery. "This print is part of our ‘Fleming’s Granger’, a collection of approximately 11,000 prints arranged and interfiled by Dr William Fleming to extra-illustrate a disbound copy of Reverend James Granger’s ‘A Biographical History of England from Egbert the Great to the Revolution’ (1st edicition, 1769) and ‘Noble’s Continuation’ (1806). Thank you for your suggestion that the sitter on the centre left is Agnellus of Pisa, not Angelo da Clareno. Such misattributions are not uncommon in Granger and your suggestion seems sensible. I have updated our catalogue accordingly." -Thank you for the link to contact them. Manannan67 (talk) 14:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

@Manannan67: That is great news! I'm glad they responded, and so quickly. I will update the filename accordingly. Gamaliel (talk) 18:07, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

File:Dr. Jerome Corsi, -Qanon Analysis, Hagmann Report.webm

File:Dr. Jerome Corsi, -Qanon Analysis, Hagmann Report.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eatcha (talk) 10:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Library Bookmobiles - From Wagons to Buses.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license and license-.

Hi Gamaliel, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

mw.loader.load('//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

mw.loader.load('//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Majora/LicenseReview.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Important: thou shalt not review thy own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 13:09, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

image

• @Gamaliel: Please approve this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hugo_López-Gattel.jpg --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 23:18, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

• @Gamaliel: Please--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 23:19, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
• @Gamaliel: Please--Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 00:41, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Susie Jim Billie collecting medicinal plants and herbs- Big Cypress Seminole Indian Reservation, Florida.jpg

Please fix the license on File:Susie Jim Billie collecting medicinal plants and herbs- Big Cypress Seminole Indian Reservation, Florida.jpg. {{Pd-user}} is not for use with files from external sources. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:59, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

I have learned a thing, thank you

Thanks for adding the image to the Emma Osterman Elmer page. I just got Ancestry.com access and did not know that passport photos would be there. This is great news! 2601:181:8200:50C0:7955:EECD:4B28:41F5 20:48, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Margaret Mann University of Michigan.jpg

Hi Gamaliel. I have a couple of questions about this file's licensing. The licensing does reflect that of the source given for the file, so at first glance it seems OK. According to the file's description, the date the photo was taken as well as the person who took the photo are unknown. The subject of the photo en:Margaret Mann (librarian) died in 1960 and the photo looks to have been taken fairly late in her life. The source website states that the photo was added/updated on September 15, 2017, and that it belong to a collection of photos created by the University of Michigan, but it doesn't state really anything more about the photo's provenance. Is this really OK as licensed? Is it OK to assume though that the source's licensing is correct, and not a case of unintentional COM:LL?

Please understand that I'm asking you about this since you uploaded the file; not because I think you did something wrong, but just because I trying to get a better grasp of file copyright licensing. Since you're an admin as well as a license reviewer perhaps there's something about the file that I'm missing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

@Marchjuly: Hello! Nothing wrong with what you're asking, I don't take any offense at all. Even though the photographer is unknown, it's not surprising that the University of Michigan owns the copyright through work-for-hire, since Mann was a faculty member there for about 12 years. Because of that I'm inclined to take the website at its word, though I have no objection if you investigate further or raise this issue elsewhere. Gamaliel (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

That sounds reasonable to me. I only stumbled upon the file by chance; for some it was on my watchlist, and it showed up again when it was edited yesterday by a bot. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Richard Stockton, Class of 1779 (1764-1828).png

File:Richard Stockton, Class of 1779 (1764-1828).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CzarJobKhaya (talk) 21:45, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

File:Richard Stockton, Class of 1779 (1764-1828) (cropped).png

File:Richard Stockton, Class of 1779 (1764-1828) (cropped).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

CzarJobKhaya (talk) 21:50, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Page family of Virginia

Hello. Just FYI I am planning to soon upload high quality page scans from Genealogy of the Page family in Virginia (1893), derived from the original .jp2 files. Much higher quality than PDF grabs. So no need to upload crops like File:Mary Mann Page (page 71 crop).jpg. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 00:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Animalparty: Thank you! I was disappointed I couldn't find a good JP2 of that book. I'll hold off on cropping more out of it. Gamaliel (talk) 00:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

No problem! For Internet Archive scans (e.g. here) I often download the Single Page Processed JP2 Zip folder, and then convert individual files to .jpg using IrfanView, a free image editing program that's good for bulk changes like cropping, desaturating, file-type conversion, etc. --Animalparty (talk) 00:25, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

I usually take the lazy way and use the IA uploader but it doesn't retrieve the JP2 files about a third or fourth of the time for some reason. Good to have a backup plan now. Gamaliel (talk) 00:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Animalparty: I downloaded Irfanview and tried your method for some images here, and it worked great. A bit time consuming, but I imagine that it will speed up once I get used to the workflow. Gamaliel (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Crops

Hello, Gamaliel. Perhaps you are not aware, but when you create a crop, automatically the description of the source copies to the crop's file page, and the same counts for the Categories of the original. This means that f.i. File:Alys Pearsall Smith (cropped).jpg still has the description that mentions all persons in the original. Even worse is that all the categories, belonging to six different persons, are also still attached to the crop. Perhaps you can pay a little bit more attention to those details, because letting it go unchanged leaves a mess. Greeting, Eissink (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2021 (UTC).

I'm aware of it, I just forgot to check this time. Thanks for letting me know, I'll clean it up. Gamaliel (talk) 00:48, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Category:Judge Advocates General of the United States Army

Hi, I noticed that you created the categories [[Judge Advocates General of the United States Army]] and [[Judge Advocate General of the United States Army]] a few years ago with the plural category redirecting to the singular category. Shouldn't that be the other way around, like with [[Presidents of the United States]] and [[President of the United States]], or with [[Judge Advocates General of the United States Navy]] (though [[Judge Advocate General of the United States Navy]] doesn't exist)? --wqnvlz (talk | contribs) 15:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Sounds right to me. I've redirected the categories, and later today or tomorrow I'll fire up AWB and correct all the pages that point to the singular. Gamaliel (talk) 15:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

PLEASE DELETE THIS 3 IMAGES It's obvious Copyright violation!!!

• File:อแมนด้า ชาลิสา ออบดัม Miss Universe Thailand 2020.jpg
• File:Miss universe thailand 2020 รวม.jpg
• File:Menuid 3 201821955.jpg

PLEASE DELETE THIS 3 IMAGES It's obvious Copyright violation!!! and block this violator Sirika karipoon! this images was not a free commons images at all!! It was uploaded so many years/weeks before he uploaded on commons.wikimedia.org.

• 1st image: it was published on https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/news/detail/901964 (https://image.bangkokbiznews.com/kt/media/image/fileupload1/source/160234895093.jpg?1602348951905) with more bigger resolution on October 10, 2020.
• 2nd image: it was published on https://thaiphotos.net/miss-universe-thailand-2020-final-competition-446160.html , https://thaicatwalk.com/archives/82801 and also the same with (same expression, same eye contact and pose) with the cropped version on https://image.bangkokbiznews.com/kt/media/image/fileupload1/source/160234900482.jpg?1602349006896 it appears with more bigger resolution on October 10, 2020.
• 3rd image: it was published on http://www.mediavision1994.com/Services?p=30 (http://www.mediavision1994.com/Services?p=30) more bigger resolution on January 28, 2018.

please delete all of this images and block the violator.--180.253.163.254 17:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry I'm not an administrator here, I can't do any of those things. Please post this on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Gamaliel (talk) 17:33, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

File:TedxWindyCity-5 (8504935872) (cropped).jpg

File:TedxWindyCity-5 (8504935872) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 Mysterymanblue  03:17, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

OpenRefine and Structured Data on Commons: community meetup, February 22

OpenRefine logo

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about Structured Data on Commons (SDC) functionalities in OpenRefine.

The OpenRefine team has made quite a bit of progress in the past months. We warmly invite you to a meetup with updates and a first demo of the newly developed SDC editing functionalities in OpenRefine. Bring your questions!

• When? Tuesday, February 22, at 15:00-17:00 UTC (check the time in your timezone).
• For whom? For anyone who is curious about the current status of SDC support in OpenRefine!
• Where? Online, via Zoom. The event's info page has the link.
• The meeting will be recorded and the recording will be published to Wikimedia Commons afterwards.

Check the event page for more info. With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 14:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

OpenRefine and SDC updates: user survey and monthly office hours

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for updates about the Structured Data on Commons (SDC) features that are currently developed for OpenRefine.

Short survey for SDC features in OpenRefine

OpenRefine is running a short survey to learn about user needs and expectations for its new SDC features. If you upload files to Wikimedia Commons and/or edit structured data there, please help by filling in this survey!

Monthly OpenRefine and Wikimedia office hours

OpenRefine's community meetup of February 22 was very well attended. You can see its recording, slides and notes here. The team now hosts monthly, informal office hours for Wikimedians (online, via Zoom). Upcoming office hours are:

• Tuesday, April 19, 2022 at 4PM UTC (how late is this in my timezone?)
• Tuesday, May 24, 2022 at 8AM UTC (how late is this in my timezone?)
• Tuesday, June 21, 2022 at 4PM UTC (how late is this in my timezone?)

The Zoom link of the next office hour will be posted on OpenRefine's info page on Wikimedia Commons. Please drop by and say hi!

All the best! SFauconnier (talk) 14:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Ida Waugh (d. 1919), Portrait of William Worthington Haly (c. 1805-1851).jpg

Hello Gamaliel, the dates in the description seem somehow odd, date: 1839, Ida Waugh: 1846–1919. She must have been 7 years old then. That was imo very, very young Cheers. Lotje (talk) 06:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Ha! Good eye. I think that's a typo in the source. I zoomed in on the signature but I can't see the date on the canvas. Gamaliel (talk) 13:17, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi Gamaliel, to me that looks like 1851, but that would be the year of his death? Lotje (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Countess of Euston - John Hoppner .jpg

Hi can you check for a specfic artist, engraver or illustrator credit, and update the file description page accordingly? {{Book}} is intended to be used for entire documents such as books or manuscripts, and it's use on a single image is misleading. A template like {{Artwork}} would be more appropriate.

It would also be appreciated if you could check for other 'extracted' images you uploaded, which may be using the {{Book}} template in error.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:52, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Dr. Ada Rebecca Thomas (page 271 crop).jpg

Hi can you check for a specfic artist, engraver or illustrator credit, and update the file description page accordingly? {{Book}} is intended to be used for entire documents such as books or manuscripts, and it's use on a single image is misleading. A template like {{Photograph}} would be more appropriate.

It would also be appreciated if you could check for other 'extracted' images you uploaded, which may be using the {{Book}} template in error.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:00, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Mrs. Daniel Webster (Grace Fletcher) - Gilbert Stuart.jpg

Hi can you check for a specfic artist, engraver or illustrator credit, and update the file description page accordingly? {{Book}} is intended to be used for entire documents such as books or manuscripts, and it's use on a single image is misleading. A template like {{Artwork}} would be more appropriate.

It would also be appreciated if you could check for other 'extracted' images you uploaded, which may be using the {{Book}} template in error.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Ritratti de pittori scultori e architetti.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Ritratti de pittori scultori e architetti.pdf, Don't forget to add a completed {{Book}} template on the file description page for your upload! It helps in providing additional catalog data on Commons, as well as on other projects. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

And File:Last hours of Christian women.pdf ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Image from page 96 of "100 years exploring life, 1888-1988 - the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole" (1989).jpg

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:The Boston Globe

Hello Gamaliel guess this and the other ones were minor errorS? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 14:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

ː̼@Lotje: What a strange error. I wish I could explain it but it was so long ago I don't remember. Thanks for catching it.Gamaliel (talk) 14:19, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Y're very welcome Gamaliel Lotje (talk) 14:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Careful

The author of a book isn't necessarily the creator of all the illustrations in it - thus, for instance, Sarah Josepha Hale shouldn't have been credited as the creator of the many images you uploaded which were sourced to her book Woman's Record, Or, Sketches of All Distinguished Women: From the Creation to A.D. 1854 : Arranged in Four Eras : with Selections from Female Writers of Every Age. Those were uploaded in 2019, but I only just now found and fixed them.

Similarly (and much more recently - earlier this month, in fact), Enrico Giannelli shouldn't be credited as the creator of the many images you uploaded that were sourced to his book Artisti napoletani viventi : pittori, scultori ed architetti : opere da loro esposte, vendute e premii ottenuti in esposizioni nazionali ed internazionali.

{{Author|unknown}} is annoying, but wrong information is worse. DS (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Antoine de Jussieu - Fresque des Lyonnais 4 (cropped).jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Antoine de Jussieu - Fresque des Lyonnais 4 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Antoine de Jussieu - Fresque des Lyonnais 4 (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

--Benoît (d) 12:32, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Madroño a West American journal of botany v6.djvu

Copyright Status: In Copyright. The volume was published in 1941—1942, not in 1916. --Geohakkeri (talk) 20:31, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Madroño a West American journal of botany v6.djvu

File:Madroño a West American journal of botany v6.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 21:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

File:University of Maryland, 1807-1907.djvu

Hi, Going randomly through, I don't see any issue. Are you sure you want to delete it? Yann (talk) 16:42, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

ːVery strange, when I last looked at it, it was an empty file, and now it looks fine. Not sure what's going on, but I will remove the SD tag. Thanks for taking a look. ̴̴