dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  /−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the   Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 08:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)



беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  eesti  français  italiano  മലയാളം  Nederlands  русский  slovenčina  српски (ћирилица)  srpski (latinica)  svenska  Tagalog  українська  /−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Ferran Mir,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 04:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Grave of James Stirling (1692-1770), detail.jpg

edit

Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  magyar  日本語  македонски  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  русский  svenska  /−


 
Thank you for uploading images from Wikipedia to Commons. However, the file you uploaded, File:Grave of James Stirling (1692-1770), detail.jpg appears to be a scaled down version of the version on Wikipedia. Please reupload the full version of the image. You can then tag the scaled down version with {{duplicate}} to have it deleted. Consider using CommonsHelper to provide the correct image description and licensing tags. Thank you,

Stefan4 (talk) 23:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:Naonobu Ajima.jpg

edit

This media has been deleted JuTa 19:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

This media may be deleted. Thanks for uploading File:Naonobu Ajima1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:50, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Magog the Ogre: Hi: I do'nt understand anythink. Today I have received an email from [email protected] (Ticket#2015050610021198) stating: Dear Ferran Mir, The permission state is fine, but your statement to him is problematic. Perhaps you missed the closing sentence: I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. In other words, he cannot withdraw the permission, once given. Yours sincerely, Stephen Philbrick.
Please, delete the file: the process to obtain permission is too much complex for me and I do'nt want to follow. Thanks.--Ferran Mir (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
  Done you may want to review Commons:Model d'autorització. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:26, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Christoff Rudolff.jpeg

edit

Actually, this is Niccolo Tartaglia depicted. --Xunks (talk) 10:13, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Xunks: , you are right. I do not remember why I have uploaded this pic. Please, feel free to erase totally. Thanks.--Ferran Mir (talk) 10:43, 4 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:Charles Briot.jpg

edit
 
File:Charles Briot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Twanes (talk) 19:43, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Hilda Hudson.jpg

edit
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  /−
 
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Hilda Hudson.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT ([email protected]). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hilda Hudson.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

--Geohakkeri (talk) 14:30, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Geohakkeri: , the photo is dated 1915, more than one hundred years ago! I do not think that it exist any copyright still valid. Of course, you can do as you consider more correct. The file was uploaded three years ago and nobody has objected so far.--Ferran Mir (talk) 14:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Okay, but at least the license template should be changed to some kind of PD template. --Geohakkeri (talk) 15:01, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Geohakkeri: , May be: {{pd-old-100-1923}}?--Ferran Mir (talk) 15:14, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
In order to use that, we should know the death year of the photographer. --Geohakkeri (talk) 15:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Geohakkeri: I do not know even the name of the photographer! Ferran Mir (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
See en:File:Hilda_Phoebe_Hudson.jpeg. The English Wikipedia considers the copyright to be still valid. --Geohakkeri (talk) 15:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Geohakkeri: That's true. Feel free to delete the file.--Ferran Mir (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply